Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Acetabular Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Acetabular Fractures

Comprehensive guide to acetabular fractures - Judet-Letournel classification, column concept, surgical approaches for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2026-01-01
High Yield Overview

ACETABULAR FRACTURES

Column Concept | Judet-Letournel Classification | Approach Selection

2-3%Of all fractures
80%Associated with hip dislocation
70%Motor vehicle accidents
2mmAcceptable step-off

JUDET-LETOURNEL CLASSIFICATION

Elementary
Pattern5 patterns (single structure)
TreatmentPosterior wall, posterior column, anterior wall, anterior column, transverse
Associated
Pattern5 patterns (combined)
TreatmentBoth column, T-type, transverse + PW, PC + PW, AC + PHT

Critical Must-Knows

  • Two-column concept - anterior and posterior columns meet at iliac crest
  • 3 Judet views - AP, obturator oblique, iliac oblique
  • Dome concept - weight-bearing 10cm arc must be reduced
  • Approach dictated by column - KL for posterior, IL/Stoppa for anterior
  • Anatomic reduction (under 2mm step) = 80% good outcomes

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Both-column = 'spur sign' on obturator oblique
  • "
    Posterior wall = most common pattern
  • "
    Sciatic nerve at risk in posterior approaches
  • "
    Delay surgery 3-5 days to reduce blood loss

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

7-panel comprehensive case: (a) Pre-reduction AP showing bilateral posterior hip dislocations, (b) Post-reduction AP, (c-d) CT axial and sagittal, (e-g) Intraoperative Kocher-Langenbeck approach photo
Click to expand
7-panel comprehensive case: (a) Pre-reduction AP showing bilateral posterior hip dislocations, (b) Post-reduction AP, (c-d) CT axial and sagittal, (e-Credit: Keel MJ et al., Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg via Open-i (NIH) - PMC3495274 (CC-BY)
6-panel both-column fracture case: (a) AP pelvis with central dislocation, (b) Axial CT, (c) 3D CT reconstruction, (d) Surgical planning, (e) Post-op CT, (f) Final AP with plate fixation
Click to expand
6-panel both-column fracture case: (a) AP pelvis with central dislocation, (b) Axial CT, (c) 3D CT reconstruction, (d) Surgical planning, (e) Post-op Credit: Keel MJ et al., Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg via Open-i (NIH) - PMC3495274 (CC-BY)
2-panel posterior wall fracture: (a) AP hip X-ray with arrows showing subtle fracture line, (b) Axial CT clearly demonstrating posterior wall fragment
Click to expand
2-panel posterior wall fracture: (a) AP hip X-ray with arrows showing subtle fracture line, (b) Axial CT clearly demonstrating posterior wall fragmentCredit: Jarraya M et al., Radiol Res Pract via Open-i (NIH) - PMC3613077 (CC-BY)
Acetabular fracture case showing obturator oblique, AP pelvis, and iliac oblique radiographic views
Click to expand
Acetabular fracture demonstrating the three standard Judet radiographic views: obturator oblique (left), AP pelvis (center), and iliac oblique (right). These views are essential for accurate fracture classification.Credit: OrthoVellum

Critical Acetabular Fracture Points

Two-Column Concept

Anterior column: Pubis to iliac crest via pelvic brim. Posterior column: Ischium to iliac crest via greater sciatic notch. They meet at the iliac crest like an inverted Y.

Judet Views

Obturator oblique (45° toward injured hip): Shows anterior column and posterior wall. Iliac oblique (45° away): Shows posterior column and anterior wall.

Dome Concept

Weight-bearing dome = superior 10cm arc. Must be anatomically reduced. Peripheral fractures may be treated conservatively.

Approach Selection

Kocher-Langenbeck: Posterior column/wall. Ilioinguinal/Stoppa: Anterior column. Extended iliofemoral: Both columns (rarely used).

At a Glance: Quick Decision Guide

PatternApproachKey Structures at RiskPriority
Posterior wallKocher-LangenbeckSciatic nerveUrgent if dislocated
Posterior columnKocher-LangenbeckSciatic nerve, SGAUrgent
Anterior columnIlioinguinal/StoppaLFCN, femoral vesselsSemi-urgent
TransverseBased on displacementColumn-specificAssess dome
Both columnUsually ilioinguinalCorona mortis, LFCNComplex - delay OK
Mnemonic

PAPATElementary Patterns

P
Posterior wall
Most common elementary pattern
A
Anterior wall
Rare, pubic rami involvement
P
Posterior column
Ischiopubic segment
A
Anterior column
Iliopubic segment
T
Transverse
Divides acetabulum in half

Memory Hook:PAPAT - 5 elementary patterns, Posterior Wall is most common!

Mnemonic

BATTPAssociated Patterns

B
Both column
Both columns separated from axial skeleton
A
Anterior + PHT
Anterior column + posterior hemitransverse
T
T-type
Transverse + vertical inferior component
T
Transverse + PW
Transverse + posterior wall
P
PC + PW
Posterior column + posterior wall

Memory Hook:5 Associated patterns combine elements - Both Column is the hallmark!

Mnemonic

OAPJudet Views

O
Obturator oblique
45° toward injured hip - sees anterior column + posterior wall
A
AP pelvis
Standard view - both columns visible
P
Posterior/Iliac oblique
45° away - sees posterior column + anterior wall

Memory Hook:OAP - Obturator sees Anterior column, iliac oblique sees Posterior column

Mnemonic

SAFESciatic Nerve Protection

S
Somatosensory monitoring
Consider for prolonged cases
A
Avoid retraction
Minimize traction on nerve
F
Flex the knee
Reduces tension on sciatic
E
External rotation
Relaxes piriformis and nerve

Memory Hook:Keep the hip SAFE during posterior approaches!

Overview and Epidemiology

Why This Topic Matters

Acetabular fractures are complex injuries requiring detailed anatomical understanding. The Judet-Letournel classification is the gold standard and must be known for the exam. Approach selection is directly tied to fracture pattern.

Demographics

  • Young adults: High-energy MVA, falls from height
  • Elderly: Low-energy falls, osteoporotic bone
  • Male predominance: 3:1 ratio
  • Associated injuries: 80% have hip dislocation

Mechanism

  • Dashboard injury: Knee strikes dashboard, force through femur
  • Position determines pattern: Flexed hip = posterior wall
  • Lateral compression: Direct blow to trochanter
  • Force magnitude: Determines comminution

Historical Context

Judet and Letournel revolutionized acetabular surgery in the 1960s-1980s. Before their work, most acetabular fractures were treated non-operatively with poor results. Their classification and surgical approaches remain the foundation today.

Anatomy and Biomechanics

The Two-Column Concept

Column Anatomy

The acetabulum is supported by two columns that meet at the iliac crest like an inverted Y:

  • Anterior column: Anterior half of iliac wing + pelvic brim + superior pubic ramus
  • Posterior column: Posterior half of iliac wing + greater/lesser sciatic notches + ischial tuberosity + inferior pubic ramus

Key Anatomical Landmarks

Radiographic Landmarks

LandmarkLocationClinical Significance
Iliopectineal lineAnterior columnDisruption = anterior column fracture
Ilioischial linePosterior columnDisruption = posterior column fracture
Acetabular roof/domeSuperior 10cm arcWeight-bearing - must reduce
Anterior wallMedial curve on APAnterior wall outline
Posterior wallLateral curve on APPosterior wall outline
TeardropFloor of acetabular fossaMedial wall/quadrilateral plate

Neurovascular Anatomy

CT scan demonstrating acetabular column anatomy with fracture visualization
Click to expand
Axial CT demonstrating acetabular anatomy - essential for understanding the two-column concept and surgical planning. CT is mandatory for accurate fracture classification and identification of marginal impaction or loose bodies.Credit: Keel MJ et al., Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg - PMC3495274 (CC-BY)

Posterior Approach Dangers

  • Sciatic nerve: Courses 1cm inferior to piriformis
  • Superior gluteal artery: Above piriformis
  • Inferior gluteal artery: Below piriformis
  • Piriformis: Key landmark

Anterior Approach Dangers

  • Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve: Medial to ASIS
  • Femoral nerve/vessels: In iliac fossa
  • Corona mortis: Anastomosis on pubic ramus
  • External iliac vessels: Medial retraction risk

Corona Mortis

Corona mortis ("crown of death") is an aberrant obturator vessel crossing the superior pubic ramus. Present in 30-70% of patients. Must be identified and ligated during Stoppa or ilioinguinal approaches.

Classification Systems

Elementary Patterns (5)

Elementary Acetabular Fracture Patterns

PatternFrequencyKey FeatureApproach
Posterior wall25% (most common)Fragment from posterior rimKocher-Langenbeck
Posterior column4%Through greater sciatic notch to obturator foramenKocher-Langenbeck
Anterior wall2% (rare)Anterior rim fragmentIlioinguinal/Stoppa
Anterior column4%Through pelvic brimIlioinguinal/Stoppa
Transverse8%Divides acetabulum horizontallyBased on displacement

Posterior Wall - Most Common

Posterior wall fractures are the most common elementary pattern (~25%). They typically occur with dashboard injuries when the hip is flexed. The sciatic nerve is at risk in up to 30% of cases.

Associated Patterns (5)

Associated Acetabular Fracture Patterns

PatternFrequencyComponentsKey Feature
Both column23%Anterior + posterior columnSpur sign, no dome attached to axial skeleton
Transverse + PW20%Transverse + posterior wallCombined pattern, common
T-type7%Transverse + inferior verticalT-shaped on CT
Posterior column + PW5%Posterior column + wallCombined posterior injury
Anterior column + PHT6%Anterior column + posterior hemitransverseBoth columns fractured

Both-Column Fracture

Both-column fracture = Both columns separated from axial skeleton. The spur sign is pathognomonic - a segment of intact ilium visible on obturator oblique view "floating" above the acetabulum.

Both-column acetabular fracture case showing preoperative imaging and surgical fixation
Click to expand
Both-column acetabular fracture in a 67-year-old following bicycle accident: (a) AP pelvis showing central dislocation, (b) Axial CT demonstrating comminuted fracture, (c) 3D CT reconstruction showing fracture pattern, (d) Surgical planning, (e) Post-operative CT showing hardware, (f) Final AP radiograph with plate and screw fixation.Credit: Keel MJ et al., Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg - PMC3495274 (CC-BY)

CT Assessment

CT is mandatory for accurate classification and surgical planning.

CT Features by Pattern

PatternCT FindingKey Slice
Posterior wallPosterior rim fragmentAxial through dome
Posterior columnFracture through greater sciatic notchSagittal reconstruction
Both columnSpur sign, no intact domeCoronal reconstruction
TransverseHorizontal fracture lineAxial through dome
T-typeTransverse + inferior verticalCoronal reconstruction

3D CT reconstructions are invaluable for surgical planning and showing the fracture pattern.

Judet-Letournel classification showing all 10 acetabular fracture patterns
Click to expand
Judet-Letournel classification: 5 elementary patterns (top row: posterior wall, posterior column, anterior wall, anterior column, transverse) and 5 associated patterns (bottom row: both column, T-type, transverse + posterior wall, posterior column + posterior wall, anterior column + posterior hemitransverse).Credit: OrthoVellum

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Mechanism: Dashboard injury, fall from height, lateral blow
  • Position at impact: Determines fracture pattern
  • Associated injuries: Head, chest, abdomen, pelvis
  • Pre-injury function: Critical for decision-making

Examination

  • Inspection: Hip position (posterior dislocation = flexed, adducted, IR)
  • Palpation: Tenderness over greater trochanter
  • ROM: Limited and painful
  • Neurovascular: Sciatic nerve (dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, sensation)

Sciatic Nerve Assessment

30% of posterior wall/column fractures have sciatic nerve injury. Always document:

  • Peroneal division (more common): Ankle/toe dorsiflexion, foot eversion, sensation dorsal foot
  • Tibial division: Ankle/toe plantarflexion, sensation plantar foot Document BEFORE and AFTER reduction/surgery!

Associated Injuries

Associated Injuries to Exclude

InjuryIncidenceAssessment
Hip dislocationUp to 80%Hip position, urgent reduction
Sciatic nerve injury30% (posterior)Motor/sensory exam
Femoral head fracture10%CT scan
Knee ligament injuryDashboard mechanismExamine knee
Ipsilateral femur fracture10%Full femur X-ray

Investigations

Imaging Protocol

First LineAP Pelvis + Judet Views

AP Pelvis: Assess both columns, dome, teardrop. Obturator oblique (45° toward): Anterior column + posterior wall. Iliac oblique (45° away): Posterior column + anterior wall.

EssentialCT with 3D Reconstruction

Mandatory for all acetabular fractures. Defines fracture pattern, comminution, impaction, loose bodies. 3D reconstructions show pattern clearly. Subtract femoral head for better visualization.

If ConcernedMRI or CT Angiography

MRI: Labral injury, femoral head cartilage. CTA: If vascular injury suspected (rare).

Radiographic Lines

Six Lines on AP Pelvis

6 key lines to assess on AP pelvis:

  1. Iliopectineal line = anterior column
  2. Ilioischial line = posterior column
  3. Acetabular roof = dome
  4. Anterior wall = medial curve
  5. Posterior wall = lateral curve
  6. Teardrop = medial wall/quadrilateral plate
AP pelvis radiograph showing the 6 characteristic radiographic lines for acetabular fracture assessment
Click to expand
AP pelvis radiograph demonstrating the 6 key radiographic lines: iliopectineal line (anterior column), ilioischial line (posterior column), acetabular roof, anterior wall, posterior wall, and teardrop (quadrilateral plate).Credit: OrthoVellum
Comparison of iliac oblique and obturator oblique radiographic views with annotated anatomical lines
Click to expand
Judet oblique views: Obturator oblique (45° toward injured hip) shows anterior column and posterior wall. Iliac oblique (45° away) shows posterior column and anterior wall. Essential for complete acetabular fracture assessment.Credit: OrthoVellum
Posterior wall acetabular fracture on radiograph and CT
Click to expand
Posterior wall acetabular fracture in a 49-year-old woman: (a) AP hip radiograph with arrows indicating subtle fracture line through posterior acetabular wall, (b) Axial CT clearly demonstrating the posterior wall fragment - CT is essential for detecting these subtle injuries.Credit: Jarraya M et al., Radiol Res Pract - PMC3613077 (CC-BY)

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Acetabular fractures management algorithm flowchart
Click to expand
Treatment decision algorithm for acetabular fractures - from classification to approach selectionCredit: OrthoVellum

Indications for Non-operative Treatment

Non-operative Criteria

CriterionThresholdRationale
DisplacementLess than 2mmAcceptable articular congruity
Roof arcGreater than 45°Dome not involved in fracture
Both columnSecondary congruenceHead moves with medial fragment
Low anterior columnBelow sourcilNon-weight bearing area

Low anterior column fractures that exit below the weight-bearing dome may be treated non-operatively if stable.

Protocol: Traction (4-8 weeks) or touch-down weight bearing with close radiographic follow-up.

Operative Indications

  • Displacement greater than 2mm at weight-bearing dome
  • Hip instability
  • Incarcerated fragments
  • Associated femoral head fracture requiring fixation
  • Failed closed reduction of hip dislocation

Timing: 3-5 days delay reduces blood loss (allows clot organization). Exceptions: Open fracture, incarcerated fragments, irreducible dislocation.

Timing of Surgery

Optimal window: 3-10 days post-injury. Earlier = more bleeding. Later (over 3 weeks) = more difficult reduction due to callus. Meta-analysis shows lower blood loss and similar outcomes with 3-5 day delay.

Surgical Approach by Pattern

Approach Selection

PatternPrimary ApproachAlternative
Posterior wallKocher-Langenbeck—
Posterior columnKocher-Langenbeck—
Anterior wallIlioinguinal/Stoppa—
Anterior columnIlioinguinal/Stoppa—
TransverseBased on major displacementKL, IL, or combined
Both columnIlioinguinal/StoppaExtended iliofemoral (rare)
Transverse + PWKocher-LangenbeckCombined if needed
T-typeKocher-Langenbeck or ILBased on displacement
PC + PWKocher-Langenbeck—
AC + PHTIlioinguinal+/- KL for posterior

Surgical Technique

Complete acetabular fracture case from diagnosis to surgical treatment
Click to expand
Acetabular fracture management sequence in a 30-year-old patient with bilateral posterior hip dislocations: (a) Pre-reduction AP pelvis showing bilateral posterior dislocations, (b) Post-reduction AP, (c-d) CT axial and sagittal reconstructions showing posterior column fracture, (e-g) Intraoperative photographs demonstrating Kocher-Langenbeck approach with fracture visualization and reduction.Credit: Keel MJ et al., Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg - PMC3495274 (CC-BY)

Kocher-Langenbeck Approach

Indications: Posterior wall, posterior column, transverse with posterior displacement

Surgical Steps

PositionLateral or Prone

Lateral decubitus with hip flexed 20-30°, or prone with bolsters. Knee flexed to relax sciatic nerve.

IncisionCurvilinear

From PSIS curving over greater trochanter, extending distally along femoral shaft, or straight for Gibson approach.

DeepSplit Gluteus Maximus

Split gluteus maximus in line with fibers. Identify and protect sciatic nerve inferior to piriformis.

AccessShort External Rotators

Detach piriformis, obturator internus, gemelli from greater trochanter (leave quadratus femoris to protect MFCA). Capsulotomy to access joint.

FixationReduction and Plating

Reduce fragments under direct vision. Buttress plate for posterior wall (spring plate). Reconstruction plate for column.

Sciatic Nerve Protection

Knee flexion reduces tension on sciatic nerve. Limit hip flexion beyond 60°. External rotation relaxes piriformis. Use retractors carefully - avoid persistent traction.

Ilioinguinal Approach

Indications: Anterior column, anterior wall, both column fractures

Surgical Steps

PositionSupine

Supine on radiolucent table. Bump under ipsilateral buttock optional.

IncisionBikini Line

From iliac crest to pubic symphysis, following inguinal crease.

WindowsThree Windows

Lateral: Between iliacus and psoas. Middle: Between psoas and femoral vessels. Medial: Medial to vessels (for pubis).

ProtectionNeurovascular

Identify and protect: LFCN (lateral), femoral nerve (under iliacus), femoral vessels (middle window), corona mortis (ligate).

FixationPlate Fixation

Reconstruction plate along pelvic brim. Lag screws into column.

Modified Stoppa Approach

Indications: Anterior column, quadrilateral plate, both column (alternative to ilioinguinal)

Advantages: Single midline incision, direct visualization of quadrilateral plate, avoids LFCN

Surgical Steps

IncisionMidline or Pfannenstiel

Vertical midline or transverse Pfannenstiel incision.

ApproachPreperitoneal

Enter preperitoneal space (Retzius). Retract bladder medially.

AccessQuadrilateral Plate

Direct visualization of quadrilateral plate and pelvic brim.

FixationInfrapectineal Plate

Plate applied to medial aspect of pelvic brim ("infrapectineal plating").

Corona Mortis

Always identify and ligate the corona mortis (obturator vessels crossing pubic ramus). Uncontrolled bleeding can be catastrophic.

Complications

Complications Overview

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Post-traumatic arthritis20-30%Malreduction, cartilage damageTHA when mature
AVN femoral head5-10%Dislocation duration, posterior injuryCore decompression, THA
Heterotopic ossification20-50%Posterior approach, head injuryProphylaxis (indomethacin or XRT)
Sciatic nerve injury10-15%Posterior approach, retractionObservation, most recover
DVT/PEVariablePelvic surgery, immobilityThromboprophylaxis
Infection3-5%Open fracture, prolonged surgeryDebridement, antibiotics

Heterotopic Ossification (HO)

HO Prophylaxis

Brooker Grade III-IV HO occurs in 20-50% of posterior approaches. Prophylaxis options:

  • Indomethacin 25mg TDS for 6 weeks (most common)
  • Radiation therapy: Single fraction 700cGy within 72 hours Both reduce severe HO to under 5%.

Post-Traumatic Arthritis

The most significant long-term complication. Risk factors:

  • Articular step greater than 2mm
  • Femoral head cartilage damage
  • Delayed reduction of dislocation
  • Age at injury

THA after acetabular fracture is technically challenging with higher complication rates. Delay at least 3-6 months for fracture healing.

Postoperative Care

Postoperative Protocol

Day 0-1Immediate

DVT prophylaxis (mechanical + LMWH). Monitor sciatic nerve function. Drain management. Pain control.

Day 1-3Mobilization

Touch-down weight bearing (TDWB) with frame/crutches. PT for ROM and strengthening.

6 WeeksFollow-up

X-rays to assess healing. Continue TDWB. Remove sutures/staples.

10-12 WeeksProgress

Partial weight bearing if healing. Repeat X-rays. Continue PT.

12-16 WeeksFull Weight Bearing

Full weight bearing when radiographic union. Return to activities. Monitor for HO, arthritis.

HO Prophylaxis Protocol

  • Indomethacin 25mg TDS for 6 weeks (start within 48h)
  • Or single-dose radiation 700cGy within 72h post-op
  • Continue DVT prophylaxis for 4-6 weeks

Outcomes and Prognosis

Radiographic Outcomes

Outcome by Reduction Quality

ReductionGradeGood/Excellent Outcome
Anatomic (0-1mm)Excellent80-85%
Imperfect (2-3mm)Satisfactory65-75%
Poor (over 3mm)Poor40-50%

Functional Outcomes

Good Prognostic Factors

  • Anatomic reduction (under 2mm)
  • Simple fracture pattern
  • Short dislocation time (under 6 hours)
  • Young age
  • No femoral head damage

Poor Prognostic Factors

  • Articular comminution
  • Femoral head impaction (Gull sign)
  • Posterior dislocation over 12 hours
  • Age over 60
  • Both-column fractures (complex)

Matta Criteria

Matta's criteria for outcome assessment:

  • Excellent: No pain, normal ROM, no limp
  • Good: Mild pain with activity, slight limp
  • Fair: Moderate pain, limp, uses cane
  • Poor: Severe pain, marked limp, disability

Anatomic reduction = 80% excellent/good outcomes

Evidence Base

Reduction Quality and Outcome

Level IV
Matta JM • Clin Orthop Relat Res (1996)
Key Findings:
  • 810 acetabular fractures with mean 6-year follow-up. Anatomic reduction (0-1mm) achieved 83% excellent/good radiographic outcomes vs 68% for imperfect (2-3mm) and 50% for poor (over 3mm).
Clinical Implication: Anatomic reduction is the single most important factor for good outcome. Every effort should be made to achieve under 2mm displacement.

Timing of Surgery

Level IV
Mears DC et al • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2003)
Key Findings:
  • Surgery between 3-10 days post-injury had lower blood loss and similar outcomes compared to surgery within 48 hours.
Clinical Implication: Delay of 3-5 days allows clot organization and reduces blood loss without compromising outcome.

HO Prophylaxis

Level II
Burd TA et al • J Orthop Trauma (2003)
Key Findings:
  • Indomethacin 25mg TDS for 6 weeks reduced Brooker III-IV HO from 35% to 7%. COX-2 inhibitors were less effective.
Clinical Implication: Indomethacin remains the gold standard for HO prophylaxis after acetabular surgery.

Sciatic Nerve Recovery

Level IV
Letournel E, Judet R • Fractures of the Acetabulum (1993)
Key Findings:
  • 70% of sciatic nerve palsies associated with acetabular fractures showed significant recovery. Peroneal division had worse prognosis.
Clinical Implication: Most iatrogenic sciatic nerve injuries recover, but preoperative palsies have variable prognosis. Document function before and after surgery.

Both-Column Secondary Congruence

Level IV
Olson SA, Matta JM • Clin Orthop Relat Res (1993)
Key Findings:
  • Both-column fractures with 'secondary congruence' (femoral head remains congruent with medial acetabular fragment) can have acceptable non-operative outcomes.
Clinical Implication: In elderly or medical unfit patients, intact secondary congruence may allow non-operative treatment of both-column fractures.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Posterior Wall Fracture with Dislocation

EXAMINER

"28-year-old driver in MVA. X-ray shows posterior hip dislocation with posterior wall fracture. Sciatic nerve intact. How do you manage this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a posterior wall acetabular fracture with hip dislocation - a surgical emergency. My priorities are: First, urgent closed reduction under sedation in ED. Assess sciatic nerve before and after reduction. Obtain CT post-reduction to assess wall size, comminution, and incarcerated fragments. If wall fragment is greater than 40% or hip is unstable after reduction, I would proceed to surgical fixation via Kocher-Langenbeck approach. Timing would be 3-5 days if hip is stable in traction. If unstable, earlier surgery. Key technical points: knee flexion to protect sciatic nerve, spring plate for posterior wall, HO prophylaxis with indomethacin postoperatively.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Urgent closed reduction in ED
Document sciatic nerve before AND after
CT to assess wall size and stability
Kocher-Langenbeck approach
HO prophylaxis mandatory
COMMON TRAPS
✗Delaying reduction
✗Not documenting nerve function
✗Operating without CT
✗Forgetting HO prophylaxis
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What percentage of wall requires fixation?"
"How do you protect the sciatic nerve?"
"What is your HO prophylaxis protocol?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Both-Column Fracture

EXAMINER

"45-year-old fell from roof. CT shows both-column acetabular fracture with spur sign visible. No dislocation. How do you approach this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
A both-column fracture means both columns are separated from the axial skeleton - the spur sign confirms this. I would assess for secondary congruence - if the femoral head remains congruent with the medial fragment, non-operative treatment may be considered in select patients. However, in a 45-year-old with good function, operative treatment is preferred. My approach would be ilioinguinal or modified Stoppa, as this gives access to both columns from anterior. Timing would be 3-5 days post-injury. Key technical points: identify and ligate corona mortis, use three windows for ilioinguinal, plate along pelvic brim. If posterior column reduction is inadequate, may need to add limited Kocher-Langenbeck.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Both-column = spur sign pathognomonic
Assess for secondary congruence
Ilioinguinal or Stoppa approach
Ligate corona mortis
May need combined approach
COMMON TRAPS
✗Using posterior approach alone
✗Not ligating corona mortis
✗Operating too early (increased bleeding)
✗Missing secondary congruence option
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the spur sign?"
"Describe the three windows of ilioinguinal"
"What is secondary congruence?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Transverse + Posterior Wall

EXAMINER

"32-year-old motorcyclist with acetabular fracture. CT shows transverse pattern with associated posterior wall fragment. Which approach?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Transverse plus posterior wall is an associated pattern that combines a horizontal fracture dividing the acetabulum with a separate posterior wall fragment. My approach would be Kocher-Langenbeck as this gives direct access to both components - I can reduce the transverse fracture and buttress plate the posterior wall. The transverse component can often be reduced indirectly and fixed with lag screws through the posterior approach. Technical keys include protecting the sciatic nerve with knee flexion, detaching short external rotators for exposure, and using a spring plate for the posterior wall to prevent re-displacement. Weight bearing would be restricted for 10-12 weeks.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Kocher-Langenbeck for both components
Transverse can be reduced indirectly
Spring plate for posterior wall
Protect sciatic nerve
HO prophylaxis
COMMON TRAPS
✗Choosing anterior approach
✗Not addressing both components
✗Excessive sciatic nerve traction
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you reduce the transverse component?"
"What is a spring plate?"
"Weight bearing protocol?"

MCQ Practice Points

Classification Question

Q: What is the most common elementary acetabular fracture pattern?

A: Posterior wall - accounts for approximately 25% of all acetabular fractures. Typically caused by dashboard injury with hip in flexed position.

Radiographic Question

Q: Which radiographic line represents the anterior column on AP pelvis?

A: Iliopectineal line - the ilioischial line represents the posterior column. Remember: "Pectineal = Anterior, Ischial = Posterior"

Approach Question

Q: What approach is used for posterior column fractures?

A: Kocher-Langenbeck - this posterior approach gives direct access to posterior column and wall. The ilioinguinal/Stoppa is used for anterior column.

Classification Question

Q: What is pathognomonic for a both-column acetabular fracture?

A: Spur sign - a fragment of intact ilium "floating" above the acetabulum visible on obturator oblique view. Indicates both columns separated from axial skeleton.

Complication Question

Q: What is the most important factor for good outcome in acetabular fractures?

A: Anatomic reduction (under 2mm) - Matta's studies showed 83% excellent/good outcomes with anatomic reduction vs 50% with poor reduction greater than 3mm.

Technical Question

Q: What is the corona mortis?

A: Aberrant obturator vessel crossing the superior pubic ramus. Present in 30-70% of patients. Must be ligated during ilioinguinal/Stoppa approaches to prevent catastrophic hemorrhage.

Australian Context

Referral Patterns

  • Tertiary referral: Major trauma centers only
  • Subspecialist surgery: Pelvic/acetabular trained surgeons
  • Transfer protocols: Early transfer if complex pattern
  • AOA Pelvic SIG: Special interest group for education

Key Points for Australian Practice

  • Acetabular fractures should be managed at tertiary trauma centers
  • Preoperative CT is mandatory and usually done at referring hospital
  • 3D reconstructions aid in pattern recognition and planning
  • Subspecialty training beyond general orthopaedic fellowship recommended

ACETABULAR FRACTURES

High-Yield Exam Summary

Classification

  • •5 Elementary: PW, PC, AW, AC, Transverse
  • •5 Associated: Both-column, T-type, Trans+PW, PC+PW, AC+PHT
  • •Posterior wall = most common (25%)
  • •Both column = spur sign pathognomonic

Radiographic Lines

  • •Iliopectineal = anterior column
  • •Ilioischial = posterior column
  • •Obturator oblique: anterior column + posterior wall
  • •Iliac oblique: posterior column + anterior wall

Approach Selection

  • •Kocher-Langenbeck: Posterior wall/column
  • •Ilioinguinal/Stoppa: Anterior wall/column
  • •Extended iliofemoral: Both column (rare)
  • •Sciatic nerve at risk in KL approach

Key Numbers

  • •Under 2mm step = acceptable reduction
  • •Greater than 40% wall = needs fixation
  • •3-5 days delay = less blood loss
  • •80% good outcome with anatomic reduction

Complications

  • •HO: 20-50% (indomethacin prophylaxis)
  • •Sciatic nerve: 10-15%
  • •Post-traumatic arthritis: 20-30%
  • •Corona mortis: ligate in anterior approaches
Quick Stats
Reading Time95 min
Related Topics

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures

Anteroposterior Compression (APC) Pelvic Injuries