Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Medial Collateral Ligament Injuries

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Medial Collateral Ligament Injuries

Comprehensive exam-ready guide to MCL injuries - grading, non-operative vs surgery, combined injuries

complete
Updated: 2025-12-17
High Yield Overview

MEDIAL COLLATERAL LIGAMENT INJURIES

Valgus Stress | Grade I-III | Usually Conservative | Combined ACL

MostCommon knee ligament injury
90%+Heal non-operatively
sMCLPrimary stabilizer
ACLMost common associated

MCL GRADING (Valgus Stress)

Grade I
PatternTenderness, no laxity
TreatmentSprain, fibers intact
Grade II
PatternLaxity with endpoint
TreatmentPartial tear
Grade III
PatternLaxity without endpoint
TreatmentComplete tear

Critical Must-Knows

  • sMCL is PRIMARY restraint to valgus at 30 degrees
  • Most MCL injuries heal conservatively (90%+)
  • Combined MCL/ACL: treat ACL, MCL heals with rehab
  • Surgery indicated: chronic instability, Grade III with ACL, multiligament
  • Test at 30 degrees flexion to isolate MCL

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Test at 0 degrees: posteromedial corner involvement if unstable
  • "
    Stener lesion equivalent: sMCL displaces over pes anserinus
  • "
    sMCL originates 5cm proximal to joint line
  • "
    dMCL is part of posteromedial capsule

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

T2 sag image demonstrates  fluid signal extending partially through the tibial attachment of the PCL consistent with a partial thickness tear of the PCL at tibial attachment.
Click to expand
T2 sag image demonstrates fluid signal extending partially through the tibial attachment of the PCL consistent with a partial thickness tear of the PCredit: USU Teaching File MUTF et al. via MedPix via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
T2 sag image demonstrates a partial thickness tear of the PCL at tibial attachment.
Click to expand
T2 sag image demonstrates a partial thickness tear of the PCL at tibial attachment.Credit: USU Teaching File MUTF et al. via MedPix via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
T1 Cor image demonstrates low signal intensity in the posterior aspect of the lateral tibial plateau and lateral femoral condyle representing bone marrow edeam and an impaction fracture of the tibiaol
Click to expand
T1 Cor image demonstrates low signal intensity in the posterior aspect of the lateral tibial plateau and lateral femoral condyle representing bone marCredit: USU Teaching File MUTF et al. via MedPix via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
T1 Sag iamge demonstrates intermediate signal extending to the undersurface of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus representing a horizontal cleavage tear of the medial meniscus.
Click to expand
T1 Sag iamge demonstrates intermediate signal extending to the undersurface of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus representing a horizontal cleCredit: USU Teaching File MUTF et al. via MedPix via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Exam Concepts

Conservative First

90%+ of MCL injuries heal without surgery. Even Grade III isolated MCL usually heals. Functional bracing and early ROM is key.

Test at 30 Degrees

Valgus stress at 30 degrees isolates the MCL. At 0 degrees, posteromedial corner and cruciates also contribute. Compare sides.

Combined MCL/ACL

Address ACL surgically, MCL usually heals. Exception: Grade III MCL with valgus laxity at 0 degrees may need MCL surgery at same time.

Surgical Indications

Surgery for: chronic instability, failed conservative, multiligament injury, Stener equivalent with MCL trapped.

MCL Injury Treatment Guide

GradeLaxityEndpointTreatment
Grade INoneFirmFunctional brace, early ROM
Grade II1-5mm increasedPresentHinged brace 4-6 weeks, rehab
Grade III Isolated5-10mm increasedAbsentHinged brace 6-8 weeks, usually heals
Grade III + ACLSignificantAbsentACL reconstruction, MCL usually heals (may need repair)
Mnemonic

VALMCL Injury Mechanism

V
Valgus
Force pushing knee inward
A
Applied laterally
Blow to lateral knee
L
Ligament stretches medially
MCL fails tensile load

Memory Hook:VAL-gus stress causes MCL injury!

Mnemonic

TWOMCL Examination

T
Thirty degrees
Isolates MCL from cruciates
W
Wide open
Compare to contralateral side
O
Zero degrees
Checks posteromedial corner too

Memory Hook:Test at TWO positions - 30 and 0 degrees!

Mnemonic

SDPLayers of Medial Knee

S
Superficial
Sartorius, gracilis, STJ
D
Deep to superficial
sMCL layer
P
Proper capsule
dMCL, posteromedial capsule

Memory Hook:SDP - Warren layers of the medial knee!

Overview and Epidemiology

MCL Healing Capacity

MCL has excellent healing capacity due to extraarticular location and good blood supply. Even Grade III tears usually heal with bracing and rehabilitation. This differentiates it from ACL/PCL.

Epidemiology

  • Most common knee ligament injury
  • Contact sports: football, rugby, hockey
  • Skiing (combined ACL/MCL common)
  • Males greater than females
  • Often combined injuries

Mechanism

  • Valgus stress: Most common
  • Contact: Blow to lateral knee
  • Non-contact: Cutting, pivoting
  • External rotation: May also injure
  • Combined ACL: Common mechanism

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

MCL Complex Anatomy

Superficial MCL (sMCL):

  • Primary valgus restraint
  • Origin: Medial femoral epicondyle (5cm proximal to joint)
  • Insertion: Proximal medial tibia (5-7cm distal to joint)
  • Two attachment sites: proximal soft tissue, distal firmly on tibia

Deep MCL (dMCL):

  • Part of posteromedial capsule
  • Meniscofemoral and meniscotibial ligaments
  • Attaches to medial meniscus

These are the key anatomical facts for the exam.

MCL Function

Primary restraint: Valgus stress (78% at 25 degrees flexion).

Secondary restraint: External rotation.

At 0 degrees extension, posteromedial capsule and cruciates also contribute - so valgus laxity at 0 degrees indicates more extensive injury.

sMCL is tightest in flexion, provides most restraint at 30 degrees.

Three Layers of Medial Knee

Layer 1: Sartorius fascia, investing fascia.

Layer 2: Superficial MCL, posterior oblique ligament.

Layer 3: Joint capsule, deep MCL.

Understanding these layers is important for surgical exposures.

Valgus at 0 Degrees = More Severe

Valgus laxity at 0 degrees extension indicates injury to posteromedial corner and possibly cruciates in addition to MCL. This is a more severe injury pattern requiring careful evaluation.

Classification Systems

MCL Injury Grading

GradePathologyExaminationLaxity
IFiber stretch, intactTender, firm endpoint0-5mm, no increase
IIPartial tearLax with endpoint5-10mm increased
IIIComplete ruptureLax without endpointGreater than 10mm increased

Compare to contralateral side - absolute values vary between individuals.

Tear Location

Femoral origin: Most common. May avulse bone.

Mid-substance: Less common.

Tibial insertion: Stener equivalent if sMCL retracts over pes.

Location affects healing and may influence surgical approach.

Associated Injuries

O Donoghue triad: MCL + ACL + medial meniscus (classic, actually ACL + lateral meniscus more common).

MCL + ACL: Very common. Address ACL, MCL usually heals.

MCL + PCL: Less common, more severe.

Multiligament: Dislocation pattern.

Always assess for associated injuries.

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Mechanism: Valgus blow, contact
  • Pain: Medial knee, at time of injury
  • Swelling: Often localized medial
  • Instability: Giving way with valgus
  • Associated injuries: Pop (ACL), locking (meniscus)

Examination

  • Tenderness: Along MCL course
  • Valgus stress 30 degrees: Isolates MCL
  • Valgus stress 0 degrees: PMC involved if lax
  • ACL tests: Lachman, pivot shift
  • Meniscus: McMurray, joint line

Valgus Stress Test Technique

Patient supine. At 30 degrees flexion, stabilize thigh, apply valgus force to ankle. Compare opening and endpoint to contralateral side. Repeat at 0 degrees - laxity here indicates posteromedial corner injury.

Key Clinical Pearls

Palpate the MCL: Tenderness along course helps identify injury location - femoral, mid-substance, or tibial.

Check ACL: Always perform Lachman and pivot shift. Combined injuries are common.

Investigations

MRI Assessment

Sensitivity: Excellent for MCL injuries.

Findings: Edema surrounding MCL, discontinuity, thickening.

Tear location: Femoral, mid-substance, tibial.

Associated injuries: ACL, meniscus, cartilage, bone bruise.

MRI not always required for isolated MCL but helps define Grade III and associated injuries.

Plain Radiographs

Usually normal in pure MCL injury.

Avulsion: Pellegrini-Stieda lesion (calcification at femoral attachment - chronic).

Stress views: Can document valgus laxity.

Associated fractures: Rule out tibial plateau, femur.

Standard assessment to rule out bony injury.

Stress Radiography

Quantifies valgus laxity for documentation.

Useful for: Chronic cases, medicolegal, research.

Side-to-side difference measured in degrees or mm of opening.

Not commonly required in clinical practice.

Pellegrini-Stieda Lesion

Pellegrini-Stieda lesion = calcification at MCL femoral origin. Represents chronic MCL injury with calcification of hematoma. Visible on X-ray. May be asymptomatic.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
mcl injuries management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for mcl injuriesCredit: OrthoVellum

MCL Injury Management

Treatment Pathway

AcuteInitial Assessment

RICE, brace in extension. Examine for associated injuries. Consider MRI if Grade III or associated injury suspected.

Isolated I-IIConservative

Hinged brace allowing ROM. Early physiotherapy. Weight bearing as tolerated. Return to sport 2-6 weeks.

Isolated IIIConservative

Hinged brace 6-8 weeks. Protected weight bearing initially. Supervised rehabilitation. Most heal.

CombinedAddress Associated

ACL reconstruction if indicated. MCL usually heals during ACL recovery. Surgery if Grade III with laxity at 0 degrees.

Non-Operative Protocol

Grade I:

  • Functional brace
  • Early ROM
  • Return to sport: 1-2 weeks

Grade II:

  • Hinged brace 4-6 weeks
  • Progressive ROM and strengthening
  • Return to sport: 4-6 weeks

Grade III:

  • Hinged brace 6-8 weeks
  • Initial protected weight bearing
  • Return to sport: 8-12 weeks

Excellent healing rates with conservative treatment.

Surgical Indications

Primary repair indications:

  • Stener equivalent (MCL trapped)
  • Bony avulsion with displacement
  • Multiligament injury

Reconstruction indications:

  • Chronic instability despite rehab
  • Failed conservative treatment
  • Combined with other ligament surgery if Grade III at 0 degrees

Surgery is uncommon for isolated MCL injuries.

Surgical Technique

MCL Repair Techniques

Acute femoral avulsion: Suture anchors or bone tunnels to restore origin.

Acute tibial avulsion: Screw with soft tissue washer.

Mid-substance tear: Primary repair with non-absorbable sutures if acute.

Augmentation with graft may be added for severe injuries.

MCL Reconstruction

Graft options:

  • Hamstring autograft (semitendinosus)
  • Allograft (Achilles, tibialis anterior)

Technique:

  • Isometric femoral and tibial tunnel placement
  • Tensioning at 20-30 degrees flexion
  • Fix with interference screws or suture buttons

Anatomic reconstruction restores valgus stability.

Combined ACL/MCL Surgery

Approach:

  • Most Grade III MCL heals with ACL reconstruction alone
  • Address MCL surgically if valgus lax at 0 degrees

Sequence:

  • ACL reconstructed first
  • MCL repaired/augmented if needed
  • Tension MCL with knee in slight flexion

Postoperative rehab is modified to protect both reconstructions.

Avoid Overtensioning MCL

When repairing or reconstructing MCL, avoid overtensioning which leads to loss of flexion and lateral compartment overload. Tension at 20-30 degrees flexion with slight valgus.

Complications

ComplicationCausePreventionManagement
StiffnessProlonged immobilizationEarly ROMPhysiotherapy, MUA if severe
Chronic laxityInadequate healingAppropriate bracing durationLate reconstruction
CalcificationHematomaEarly ROM, avoid NSAIDs acutelyUsually asymptomatic
Saphenous nerveSurgeryCareful dissectionNeuroma management

Stiffness Prevention

Early ROM is key to preventing stiffness. Even Grade III injuries benefit from hinged bracing allowing motion rather than cast immobilization. Stiffness is the enemy.

Postoperative Care

Rehabilitation Protocol

Week 0-2Protection

Hinged brace locked initially. Toe touch weight bearing. Quad sets, SLR.

Week 2-6ROM

Progressive ROM in brace. Increase weight bearing. Gentle strengthening.

Week 6-12Strengthening

Full ROM. Progressive resistance. Proprioception. Wean brace.

Month 3-6Return to Sport

Sport-specific training. Functional testing. Full return when stable.

Conservative vs Surgical Rehab

Conservative: Faster progression, early ROM encouraged. Surgical (reconstruction): More protected initially, similar final timeline. Both aim for full ROM and strength before return to sport.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Outcomes by Grade

Grade I: Excellent outcomes. Return to sport 1-2 weeks. Minimal long-term sequelae.

Grade II: Good outcomes. Return to sport 4-6 weeks. Bracing during sport initially helpful.

Grade III Isolated: Most heal with bracing. Some chronic laxity may persist but often asymptomatic.

Combined Injuries: Outcomes depend on addressing all pathology. ACL reconstruction with MCL healing typical.

Evidence Base and Key Studies

Non-Operative Treatment of MCL

4
Fetto JF, Marshall JL • JBJS (1978)
Key Findings:
  • Classic study of conservative MCL treatment
  • Functional bracing with early ROM
  • Excellent outcomes for isolated injuries
  • Established conservative approach
Clinical Implication: Isolated MCL injuries heal well with functional treatment.
Limitation: Old study, no comparative group.

Combined ACL/MCL Injury Management

2
Halinen J et al. • JBJS Br (2006)
Key Findings:
  • RCT: ACL reconstruction + MCL surgery vs ACL alone
  • No difference in outcomes
  • MCL heals with ACL reconstruction
  • Avoid MCL surgery in most combined
Clinical Implication: ACL reconstruction alone sufficient for most combined ACL/MCL injuries.
Limitation: Small numbers.

MCL Reconstruction Outcomes

4
Kim SJ et al. • AJSM (2008)
Key Findings:
  • MCL reconstruction for chronic instability
  • 85% good/excellent outcomes
  • Restored valgus stability
  • Low complication rate
Clinical Implication: Reconstruction effective for chronic MCL instability.
Limitation: Case series, no comparison.

Grade III MCL Natural History

4
Reider B et al. • AJSM (1994)
Key Findings:
  • Isolated Grade III MCL treated conservatively
  • High rate of healing
  • Some residual laxity but not symptomatic
  • Good functional outcomes
Clinical Implication: Even Grade III isolated MCL can heal conservatively.
Limitation: Observational.

MCL Healing Biology

5
Frank C et al. • Clin Orthop (1983)
Key Findings:
  • MCL has extraarticular location
  • Good blood supply
  • Scar formation leads to healing
  • Differs from intraarticular ACL
Clinical Implication: MCL biology supports conservative treatment approach.
Limitation: Basic science study.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Contact Sports Injury

EXAMINER

"A 22-year-old rugby player sustains a valgus blow to his knee during a tackle. He has medial knee pain and swelling. Examination shows Grade II laxity at 30 degrees with a firm endpoint. Lachman is negative. How would you manage this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is an isolated Grade II MCL injury from a classic valgus mechanism. The negative Lachman is reassuring that the ACL is intact, and the firm endpoint indicates partial rather than complete tear. My management would be conservative. I would provide a hinged knee brace allowing ROM while preventing valgus stress. He can weight bear as tolerated with crutches initially for comfort. Early physiotherapy focusing on ROM, quadriceps strengthening, and proprioception would begin within the first week. I would see him at 2 weeks to reassess stability and progress rehabilitation. Most Grade II MCL injuries heal well with return to sport at 4-6 weeks. He may benefit from a protective brace during rugby for the remainder of the season. I would not routinely order MRI for an isolated Grade II MCL with negative ACL examination unless there were concerns about meniscal injury or slow progress.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Isolated Grade II MCL injury
Conservative management appropriate
Hinged brace allowing ROM
Early physiotherapy
Return to sport 4-6 weeks
COMMON TRAPS
✗Immobilizing in a cast (causes stiffness)
✗Rushing to MRI for obvious clinical diagnosis
✗Delaying ROM
✗Missing associated ACL injury
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if Lachman was positive?"
"When would you get an MRI?"
"How do you grade MCL injuries?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Combined ACL/MCL Injury

EXAMINER

"A 28-year-old skier with a twisting fall presents with a swollen knee. Examination shows Grade III MCL laxity and positive Lachman with pivot shift. MRI confirms ACL rupture and Grade III MCL tear. What is your treatment plan?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a combined ACL and Grade III MCL injury, a common pattern in skiing accidents. My approach would be to address the ACL surgically while allowing the MCL to heal conservatively. Initially, I would brace the knee in extension for 2-3 weeks to allow early MCL healing and recovery of ROM. Once the swelling settles and ROM returns (particularly full extension), I would proceed with ACL reconstruction, typically at 4-6 weeks. During the ACL recovery period, the MCL will continue to heal. I would not routinely repair or reconstruct the MCL in this scenario because the evidence shows that isolated ACL reconstruction with MCL conservative treatment produces equivalent outcomes to combined surgery. The exception would be if she had persistent valgus laxity at 0 degrees extension at the time of ACL surgery, which might indicate a posteromedial corner injury requiring surgical attention. Her ACL rehabilitation would proceed as standard, with the MCL expected to be healed by the time of return to sport.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Common combined injury pattern
ACL reconstruction, MCL heals conservatively
Allow MCL healing before ACL surgery
Evidence supports this approach
Exception if laxity at 0 degrees
COMMON TRAPS
✗Operating on both ligaments
✗Immediate ACL surgery before MCL settles
✗Not recognizing the combined pattern
✗Missing posteromedial corner involvement
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What evidence supports conservative MCL treatment?"
"When would you surgically address the MCL?"
"How is the rehabilitation modified?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Chronic MCL Instability

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old presents with ongoing medial knee instability 6 months after an MCL injury that was treated conservatively. He has failed prolonged rehabilitation. Valgus stress shows Grade II laxity at 30 degrees. What would you recommend?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is chronic MCL instability that has failed conservative treatment. Before recommending surgery, I would ensure that rehabilitation has been adequate - specifically that he has regained full quadriceps and hamstring strength, as dynamic stabilizers can compensate for some ligamentous laxity. I would also clarify his functional demands and the specific activities that cause instability. If he has truly failed appropriate rehabilitation (3-6 months of targeted physiotherapy), has ongoing symptomatic instability affecting his work or sport, and the laxity is documented on examination, I would offer MCL reconstruction. I would use an autograft (semitendinosus) or allograft for anatomic reconstruction of the superficial MCL. The technique involves identifying the femoral and tibial insertions of the sMCL and placing isometric tunnels. The graft is passed and fixed with interference screws or suture buttons with the knee at 20-30 degrees flexion and slight valgus load. Postoperatively, he would be in a hinged brace for 6 weeks with progressive ROM and strengthening, returning to sport at 4-6 months.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Chronic MCL instability after failed conservative
Ensure adequate rehabilitation trial
MCL reconstruction for persistent instability
Autograft or allograft options
Anatomic reconstruction technique
COMMON TRAPS
✗Operating before adequate rehab trial
✗Repairing instead of reconstructing chronic injury
✗Overtensioning the graft
✗Not addressing associated pathology
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What graft would you use?"
"How do you tension the graft?"
"What other structures would you check?"

MCQ Practice Points

Primary MCL Function

Q: What is the primary function of the sMCL? A: Restraint to valgus stress - provides 78% of valgus restraint at 25 degrees flexion.

Why Test at 30 Degrees

Q: Why test MCL at 30 degrees flexion? A: Isolates the MCL. At 0 degrees, posteromedial capsule and cruciates also contribute. Laxity at 0 degrees indicates more severe injury.

MCL Healing

Q: Why does MCL heal better than ACL? A: Extraarticular location and good blood supply. Not bathed in synovial fluid. Forms healing scar tissue.

Combined ACL/MCL

Q: How should combined ACL/MCL injury be treated? A: ACL reconstruction, MCL heals conservatively. Exception is Grade III MCL with laxity at 0 degrees may need surgical MCL.

Pellegrini-Stieda

Q: What is Pellegrini-Stieda lesion? A: Calcification at MCL femoral origin from chronic injury with hematoma calcification. Visible on X-ray.

Stener Equivalent

Q: What is the MCL Stener equivalent? A: sMCL displaces over pes anserinus preventing healing. Indication for surgical reduction.

Australian Context

Clinical Practice

  • Common contact sports injury
  • Conservative treatment standard
  • Functional bracing widely used
  • Combined ACL/MCL protocol established
  • Reconstruction rarely needed

Funding and Access

  • Braces available/subsidized
  • Physiotherapy accessible
  • Return to sport protocols clear
  • Sports medicine specialists manage

Orthopaedic Exam Relevance

MCL injuries are common viva topics. Know the conservative treatment algorithm, when NOT to operate, and how to manage combined injuries. Also know the anatomy and grading system.

MEDIAL COLLATERAL LIGAMENT INJURIES

High-Yield Exam Summary

Grading (Valgus at 30 degrees)

  • •Grade I: Tender, firm endpoint, no laxity
  • •Grade II: Laxity with endpoint
  • •Grade III: Laxity without endpoint
  • •Compare to contralateral side

Examination Key Points

  • •Test at 30 degrees: Isolates MCL
  • •Test at 0 degrees: PMC if unstable here
  • •Always check ACL (Lachman, pivot)
  • •Palpate along MCL course

Treatment Algorithm

  • •Grade I-II: Conservative (90%+ heal)
  • •Grade III isolated: Usually conservative
  • •Combined ACL/MCL: ACL surgery, MCL heals
  • •Surgery: chronic instability, Stener, multilig

Anatomy Pearls

  • •sMCL: primary valgus restraint
  • •Origin 5cm proximal to joint line
  • •dMCL: part of posteromedial capsule
  • •Warren layers: 3 layers medial knee

Return to Sport

  • •Grade I: 1-2 weeks
  • •Grade II: 4-6 weeks
  • •Grade III: 8-12 weeks
  • •Protective brace may help initially
Quick Stats
Reading Time64 min
Related Topics

AC Joint Injuries in Athletes

Achilles Tendinopathy

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Anterior Shoulder Instability