Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Olecranon Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Olecranon Fractures

Comprehensive guide to olecranon fractures - Mayo classification, tension band wiring, plate fixation, and surgical decision-making for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2024-12-14
High Yield Overview

OLECRANON FRACTURES - TRICEPS AVULSION INJURY

Extensor Mechanism Disruption | Tension Band Principle | Articular Involvement

10%Of elbow fractures
BimodalYoung trauma, elderly falls
2mmStep-off threshold for surgery
80%Hardware removal for TBW

MAYO CLASSIFICATION

Type I
PatternUndisplaced or minimally displaced
TreatmentConservative possible
Type II
PatternDisplaced, stable elbow
TreatmentTBW or plate fixation
Type III
PatternDisplaced, unstable elbow
TreatmentPlate fixation + additional stabilization

Critical Must-Knows

  • Triceps insertion - olecranon fractures disrupt the extensor mechanism
  • Articular fracture - olecranon forms proximal ulnohumeral articulation
  • Tension band principle - converts tensile forces to compressive forces at articular surface
  • Plate fixation preferred for comminuted and unstable patterns
  • Symptomatic hardware is common - discuss removal with patients

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Tension band only works for simple transverse or oblique fractures
  • "
    Comminution or oblique patterns require plate fixation
  • "
    Mayo Type III indicates elbow instability - more complex treatment
  • "
    Check for associated coronoid and radial head fractures (terrible triad)

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

olecranon-fractures imaging 1
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for olecranon-fracturesCredit: Open-i / NIH via PMC4653295 (CC-BY)
olecranon-fractures imaging 2
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for olecranon-fracturesCredit: Open-i / NIH via PMC4653295 (CC-BY)
olecranon-fractures imaging 3
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for olecranon-fracturesCredit: Open-i / NIH via PMC4653295 (CC-BY)
olecranon-fractures imaging 4
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for olecranon-fracturesCredit: Fujimori T et al., J Med Case Rep via PMC3470946 (CC-BY)
Mayo type II olecranon fracture with hook plate fixation
Click to expand
Six-panel radiographic series demonstrating surgical management of Mayo type II olecranon fracture: (a,b) Preoperative AP and lateral X-rays showing displaced fracture with loss of extensor mechanism continuity; (c,d) Postoperative views showing anatomic reduction with hook plate and screw fixation; (e,f) 24-month follow-up demonstrating complete bony union with restored elbow function.Credit: Zhang et al., J Orthop Surg Res (PMC11780780) - CC BY 4.0

Critical Olecranon Fracture Exam Points

Extensor Mechanism

The olecranon is the triceps insertion. Fractures disrupt active elbow extension. Patient cannot extend against gravity = functional test for complete disruption.

Tension Band Principle

Figure-of-8 wire converts tensile forces to compression at the articular surface. Only works for simple transverse/short oblique fractures. Comminution requires plate.

Plate Indications

Plate fixation preferred for: oblique fracture (greater than 30 degrees), comminuted, Monteggia variant, Mayo Type III, osteoporotic bone, trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations.

Hardware Issues

80% hardware removal with tension band wiring due to prominence. Pre-operative counseling essential. Plate fixation has lower but still significant removal rates (20-30%).

Quick Decision Guide

Fracture PatternMayo TypeTreatment
Undisplaced (less than 2mm)Type IConservative - cast/splint, early motion
Simple transverse, stable elbowType IIATension band wiring (TBW)
Comminuted, stable elbowType IIBPlate fixation
Displaced with elbow instabilityType IIIPlate fixation + address instability
Trans-olecranon fracture-dislocationComplexPlate fixation + restore ulnohumeral joint
Osteoporotic/elderly with comminutionVariableConsider plate or fragment excision + triceps repair
Mnemonic

MAYO - Classification Framework

M
Mechanism determines pattern
Direct blow vs fall on flexed elbow
A
Articular displacement
I = undisplaced, II/III = displaced
Y
Yes or no to instability
Type III = unstable elbow
O
Obliquity/comminution
A = non-comminuted, B = comminuted

Memory Hook:MAYO classification: displacement + stability + comminution guide treatment

Mnemonic

TBW - Tension Band Wiring Technique

T
Two parallel K-wires
Intramedullary placement preferred
B
Behind anterior cortex
K-wires should engage anterior cortex distally
W
Wire figure-of-8
Deep to triceps, superficial to K-wires

Memory Hook:TBW: Two wires Behind the cortex, Wire in figure-8

Post-operative AP and lateral X-rays showing tension band wire fixation for olecranon fracture
Click to expand
Post-operative AP and lateral radiographs demonstrating tension band wiring (TBW) for olecranon fracture. The construct consists of two parallel K-wires through the proximal ulna with a figure-of-8 wire dorsally, converting tensile forces from the triceps into compression across the fracture site. Note the anatomic reduction of the articular surface.Credit: Fujimori T et al., J Med Case Rep (PMC3470946) - CC-BY
Mnemonic

PLATE - When to Use Plate Fixation

P
Proximal ulna involved
Extension into shaft (Monteggia variant)
L
Long oblique fracture
Greater than 30 degrees obliquity
A
Articular comminution
Multiple fragments at joint
T
Trans-olecranon type
Fracture-dislocation patterns
E
Elderly with osteoporosis
Poor bone quality for TBW

Memory Hook:PLATE fixation for these specific indications

Mnemonic

2-30-80 Rule

2
2mm step-off
Threshold for surgical intervention
30
30 degree obliquity
More than 30 degrees = plate instead of TBW
80
80% hardware removal
Expected TBW removal rate for symptomatic hardware

Memory Hook:2mm triggers surgery, 30 degrees triggers plate, 80% need hardware out

Overview and Epidemiology

Olecranon fractures are common elbow injuries that disrupt the extensor mechanism and the ulnohumeral articulation. Understanding the biomechanics is essential for appropriate management.

Bimodal distribution:

  • Young adults (20-40): High-energy trauma (MVA, sports, falls from height)
  • Elderly (60+): Low-energy falls, osteoporotic bone

Mechanism of injury:

  • Direct blow - fall onto point of elbow (most common)
  • Indirect - fall on outstretched hand with triceps contraction (avulsion)
  • Combined - direct blow + muscle contraction

Functional Significance

The olecranon is the insertion of the triceps and forms the proximal ulnohumeral articulation. Fractures cause loss of active extension (extensor mechanism disruption) and articular incongruity (affecting elbow function).

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Bony anatomy:

  • Olecranon process - proximal ulna, forms posterior elbow prominence
  • Greater sigmoid notch (trochlear notch) - articular surface for trochlea
  • Coronoid process - anterior buttress, critical for stability
  • Subcutaneous position - minimal soft tissue coverage

Muscular attachments:

  • Triceps brachii - inserts on posterior olecranon tip
  • Anconeus - lateral to olecranon, dynamic stabilizer

Biomechanics:

Tension Band Principle

The triceps generates tensile forces on the posterior olecranon. The tension band (figure-of-8 wire) converts these to compressive forces at the articular surface. This requires intact anterior cortex to work as a compression hinge.

Key biomechanical concepts:

  • Triceps force: up to 3x body weight
  • Posterior tension, anterior compression during flexion
  • Tension band only works with intact anterior cortex
  • Comminution disrupts the hinge - plate fixation required

Neurovascular considerations:

  • Ulnar nerve - posterior to medial epicondyle, at risk with medial dissection
  • Subcutaneous position - easy access but high hardware prominence

Classification Systems

Mayo Classification (most widely used)

TypeDisplacementStabilitySubtype
IUndisplaced (less than 2mm)Stable-
IIDisplacedStableA = non-comminuted, B = comminuted
IIIDisplacedUnstableA = non-comminuted, B = comminuted

Stability Definition

Stable = intact ulnohumeral joint with no subluxation. Unstable = associated elbow instability, subluxation, or fracture-dislocation pattern. Type III requires addressing both fracture and instability.

Schatzker Classification (anatomic pattern)

TypeDescription
ATransverse simple
BTransverse impacted
COblique
DComminuted
EOblique-distal
FFracture with proximal ulna involvement

More descriptive of fracture morphology but Mayo more commonly used clinically.

Colton Classification (historical)

TypeDescription
1Undisplaced
2Avulsion
3Oblique from trochlear notch
4Comminuted

Less commonly used but may appear in older literature.

Special Pattern: Trans-olecranon Fracture-Dislocation

  • Fracture through olecranon with anterior dislocation of ulna
  • Different from Monteggia - fracture is more proximal
  • Coronoid usually intact (distinguishes from terrible triad)
  • Requires plate fixation to restore ulnohumeral joint
  • May have associated radial head injury

Recognition

Trans-olecranon fracture-dislocation may be missed if only looking at olecranon. Check ulnohumeral joint alignment on lateral X-ray. The ulna is dislocated anterior to the trochlea.

Clinical Presentation and Assessment

History:

  • Mechanism (direct blow, fall, sports)
  • Ability to extend elbow post-injury
  • Previous elbow problems
  • Hand dominance
  • Occupation and activity level

Physical examination:

Physical Examination Findings

FindingSignificanceAction
Palpable gap posteriorlyDisplaced fractureConfirms diagnosis
Cannot extend against gravityExtensor mechanism disruptionSurgical indication
Skin abrasion/lacerationOpen fracture or at riskAntibiotics if open, protect skin
Elbow instability on stressMayo Type III patternPlan for additional stabilization
Crepitus on flexionArticular involvementCT for surgical planning

Functional testing:

  • Active extension test: Patient attempts to extend elbow against gravity
  • Inability to extend = complete extensor mechanism disruption = surgical indication
  • Intact extension with minimal displacement may be treated conservatively

Neurovascular examination:

  • Ulnar nerve function (little finger sensation, FDI strength)
  • Median and radial nerve function
  • Vascular status

Skin Assessment

The olecranon is subcutaneous. Direct trauma often causes skin abrasion or laceration. Assess carefully for open injury. Even closed fractures may have compromised skin that affects surgical timing and approach.

Investigations

Radiographic assessment:

Standard views:

  • True lateral elbow - most important view
    • Shows fracture pattern, displacement, articular involvement
    • Assess ulnohumeral alignment
  • AP elbow - confirms fracture, shows medial/lateral extent
  • Oblique views - may help characterize pattern

Lateral View Key

The true lateral X-ray is essential. It shows fracture displacement, angulation, comminution, and most importantly ulnohumeral joint alignment. Anterior subluxation suggests Type III or trans-olecranon fracture-dislocation.

Lateral elbow radiograph showing displaced olecranon fracture
Click to expand
True lateral radiograph of the left elbow demonstrating a displaced olecranon fracture. Note the clear fracture line through the olecranon process with proximal displacement of the fragment due to triceps pull. The lateral view is the most important for assessing fracture pattern, displacement, and ulnohumeral joint alignment - anterior subluxation of the ulna would indicate a more complex injury pattern.Credit: Segaren N et al., Case Rep Surg (PMC3977122) - CC BY 4.0

CT imaging:

Indications:

  • Complex/comminuted fractures
  • Trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations
  • Associated coronoid or radial head fractures
  • Surgical planning for plate placement

What to assess:

  • Fracture pattern and comminution
  • Articular surface involvement
  • Coronoid integrity
  • Associated injuries

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for olecranon fractures
Click to expand
Treatment algorithm based on Mayo classification: non-displaced (cast), displaced stable (TBW or plate), displaced unstable (plate), and elderly/low-demand options.Credit: OrthoVellum

Conservative management criteria:

Conservative Treatment Criteria

CriterionRequirement
DisplacementLess than 2mm step-off
Extensor mechanismIntact (can extend against gravity)
StabilityNo elbow instability
Patient factorsLow-demand, compliant with restrictions

Protocol:

  • Posterior splint at 45-90 degrees flexion
  • Begin ROM exercises at 1-2 weeks
  • Avoid resisted extension for 6 weeks
  • Serial X-rays to monitor displacement

Watch for Displacement

Fractures treated conservatively must be monitored closely. Displacement can occur in first 2 weeks. Weekly X-rays initially, convert to surgery if displacement exceeds 2mm.

Indications for surgery:

  • Displacement greater than 2mm
  • Loss of extensor mechanism (unable to extend against gravity)
  • Elbow instability
  • Associated injuries (Monteggia, trans-olecranon fracture-dislocation)

These criteria guide the decision between conservative and operative management approaches.

Surgical Technique

Olecranon fracture hook plate fixation - multiplanar views
Click to expand
Six-panel radiographic series demonstrating hook plate fixation for Mayo type II olecranon fracture: (a,b) Preoperative AP and lateral views showing displaced fracture; (c,d) Postoperative radiographs with anatomic hook plate providing stable fixation along the posterior tension surface; (e,f) 24-month follow-up showing excellent bony union. Plate fixation is preferred for comminuted, oblique, or osteoporotic fractures.Credit: Zhang et al., J Orthop Surg Res (PMC11780780) - CC BY 4.0

Tension Band Wiring (TBW) - classic technique

Indications:

  • Simple transverse or short oblique fractures
  • Non-comminuted (Mayo IIA)
  • Intact anterior cortex

Technique:

  • Posterior longitudinal incision
  • Reduce fracture anatomically
  • Two parallel 1.6-2.0mm K-wires, intramedullary or bicortical
  • Figure-of-8 wire (1.0-1.2mm) deep to triceps, superficial to K-wires
  • Tighten wire to achieve compression
  • Bend and bury K-wire ends

Key points:

  • K-wires should engage anterior cortex distally
  • Wire must be posterior to K-wires (on tension side)
  • Check reduction with flexion-extension before final tightening

TBW Biomechanics

Tension band only works when the anterior cortex is intact to act as a compression hinge. With elbow flexion, tensile forces on posterior wire are converted to compression at the articular surface.

Plate Fixation - increasingly preferred

Indications:

  • Oblique fracture (greater than 30 degrees from transverse)
  • Comminuted fractures (Mayo IIB, IIIB)
  • Osteoporotic bone
  • Monteggia variants
  • Trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations
  • Mayo Type III (unstable)

Plate options:

  • Posterior contoured plate
  • Precontoured olecranon plates (3.5mm)
  • Locking plates for osteoporotic bone
  • Hook plate (captures proximal fragment)

Technique:

  • Posterior longitudinal incision
  • Reduce and provisionally fix articular surface
  • Apply plate to posterior surface
  • Proximal screws through triceps insertion
  • Intramedullary screw option for proximal fragment

Plate Advantages

Plate fixation provides more rigid fixation than TBW, especially in comminuted or oblique patterns. Hardware removal rates (20-30%) are lower than TBW (80%). Increasingly favored in modern practice.

Fragment Excision + Triceps Advancement

Indications:

  • Elderly, low-demand patients
  • Severe comminution not amenable to fixation
  • Fragment less than 50% of olecranon
  • No instability after excision

Contraindications:

  • Young, active patients
  • More than 50% of olecranon involved
  • Elbow instability after excision

Technique:

  • Excise comminuted fragments
  • Advance triceps to remaining ulna
  • Drill holes or suture anchors for attachment
  • Test stability through ROM

Stability Check

After excision, assess elbow stability through full ROM. If instability present, excision is contraindicated. Consider plate fixation instead or address instability with additional procedures.

Trans-olecranon Fracture-Dislocation:

  • Reduce ulnohumeral joint first
  • Plate fixation of olecranon
  • Assess and address radial head if injured
  • Coronoid usually intact - provides stability

Mayo Type III (Unstable):

  • Address olecranon with plate fixation
  • Repair lateral collateral ligament if deficient
  • Consider hinged external fixator for severe instability

Open Fractures:

  • I&D, antibiotics
  • May proceed with fixation if clean wound
  • Tension band avoided if soft tissue compromise

Complex patterns require individualized treatment plans based on injury severity and soft tissue status.

Complications

Tension band wiring complication - K-wire withdrawal
Click to expand
Two-panel radiographs demonstrating the most common complication of tension band wiring: (a) AP view showing K-wire backing out proximally with figure-8 wire still in place; (b) Lateral view confirming K-wire migration. Symptomatic hardware requiring removal occurs in approximately 80% of TBW cases - a key exam point supporting the trend toward plate fixation for appropriate fracture patterns.Credit: Zhang et al., J Orthop Surg Res (PMC11780780) - CC BY 4.0
Olecranon fracture nonunion after tension band wiring
Click to expand
Two-panel radiographs (AP and lateral) demonstrating delayed union or nonunion following tension band wiring for olecranon fracture: (a) AP view showing K-wires with figure-of-8 wire construct and persistent fracture lucency; (b) Lateral view confirming lack of complete healing at the fracture site. Nonunion (5-10% incidence) is managed with revision fixation, typically plate osteosynthesis with bone grafting.Credit: Beckmann N et al., Case Rep Med (PMC4651706) - CC BY 4.0

Complications of Olecranon Fracture Treatment

ComplicationIncidenceManagement
Symptomatic hardware80% TBW, 20-30% plateHardware removal after union
Elbow stiffness10-20%Physiotherapy, dynamic splinting, release if severe
Nonunion5-10%Revision fixation with bone graft
Infection2-5%Antibiotics, debridement, may need hardware removal
Post-traumatic arthritis5-15%Arthroplasty if severe and symptomatic
Ulnar neuropathy2-5%Usually neurapraxia, protect nerve intraoperatively
K-wire migration5-10% TBWBend ends, early removal if backing out

Hardware-related issues:

Hardware Counseling

Pre-operative counseling about hardware prominence is essential. The olecranon is subcutaneous with minimal soft tissue coverage. Most TBW patients require hardware removal. Plate fixation has lower but still significant removal rates.

Stiffness:

  • Common after elbow trauma
  • Goal: functional arc 30-130 degrees
  • Prevention: stable fixation, early motion
  • Treatment: physiotherapy, splinting, surgical release

Nonunion:

  • More common with inadequate fixation or infection
  • Treatment: revision with plate fixation and bone graft
  • May need triceps advancement if fragment excision required

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Post-fixation protocol:

Day 0-3
  • Posterior splint at 90 degrees
  • Elevation, ice
  • Finger motion encouraged
  • Wound check
Week 1-2
  • Begin active ROM
  • Splint between exercises if needed
  • No resisted extension
  • Gravity-assisted extension
Week 2-6
  • Progressive active ROM
  • Goal: full extension by 6 weeks
  • Continue avoiding resisted extension
  • May use dynamic splinting if stiff
Week 6-12
  • Begin gentle strengthening
  • Progressive loading
  • Functional activities
3-6 months
  • Full strengthening
  • Return to sport/work
  • Hardware removal if symptomatic (after union confirmed)

Key rehabilitation principles:

  • Early motion is essential
  • Avoid resisted extension until 6 weeks
  • Stable fixation permits aggressive ROM
  • Hardware prominence may limit motion (remove if symptomatic)

Outcomes and Prognosis

Outcomes by treatment:

TreatmentGood/ExcellentKey Points
TBW85-95%High hardware removal rate
Plate85-95%Lower hardware issues
Excision70-85%Reserved for elderly, selected cases
Conservative80-90%Only for truly undisplaced

Prognostic factors:

  • Fracture complexity (comminution worse)
  • Associated injuries (coronoid, radial head)
  • Quality of reduction
  • Patient compliance with rehabilitation
  • Bone quality

TBW vs Plate Outcomes

Functional outcomes are similar between TBW and plate fixation. The main difference is hardware-related complications - higher with TBW. Plate fixation is increasingly preferred, especially for comminuted patterns.

Evidence Base

Level I
📚 Duckworth et al. Meta-analysis
Key Findings:
  • No significant difference in functional outcomes between TBW and plate fixation. Plate fixation had lower re-operation rate (2% vs 22%) primarily due to less hardware removal.
Clinical Implication: Both techniques produce good outcomes. Plate fixation preferred when considering re-operation rates. Choice may depend on fracture pattern.
Source: Bone Joint J 2017

Level IV
📚 Netz et al. Long-term Follow-up
Key Findings:
  • Classic tension band wiring study. 96% good/excellent results at 2 years. 85% required hardware removal for prominence.
Clinical Implication: TBW produces reliable functional outcomes but symptomatic hardware is expected. Counsel patients pre-operatively.
Source: Acta Orthop Scand 1982

Level IV
📚 Hume and Wiss
Key Findings:
  • Plate fixation for olecranon fractures produced 92% good/excellent results. Particularly useful for comminuted and oblique patterns where TBW is biomechanically inferior.
Clinical Implication: Plate fixation is reliable and should be considered first-line for complex patterns.
Source: Clin Orthop 1992

Level IV
📚 Gartsman et al. Fragment Excision
Key Findings:
  • Excision of up to 50% of olecranon with triceps advancement produces acceptable results in elderly, low-demand patients. Beyond 50% risks instability.
Clinical Implication: Fragment excision is a valid option in selected elderly patients with severe comminution. Stability must be confirmed.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981

Level IV
📚 Ring et al. Trans-olecranon Fracture-Dislocation
Key Findings:
  • Trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations are distinct from Monteggia injuries. Plate fixation restoring ulnohumeral joint produces good outcomes.
Clinical Implication: Recognize trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations as distinct pattern requiring plate fixation and restoration of joint congruity.
Source: J Orthop Trauma 1997

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Simple Displaced Fracture

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old man falls directly onto his left elbow. X-rays show a displaced transverse olecranon fracture with 5mm of articular step-off. The elbow is stable on examination. Describe your management."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Thank you. This 35-year-old has a **displaced transverse olecranon fracture** with 5mm articular step-off - a clear surgical indication. **Classification:** This is a **Mayo Type IIA** fracture - displaced (more than 2mm), stable elbow, non-comminuted pattern. **Clinical Confirmation:** I would confirm the extensor mechanism disruption by asking the patient to extend the elbow against gravity. Inability to do so confirms triceps discontinuity and supports surgical indication. **Surgical Options:** For this simple transverse pattern, two options are appropriate: **Option 1: Tension Band Wiring (TBW)** - **Technique**: Two parallel 1.6mm K-wires placed either intramedullary or bicortically, engaging the **anterior cortex** distally - Figure-of-8 18-gauge wire placed through a drill hole in the ulna and around the K-wires - The wire must be on the **posterior (tension) surface** to convert tensile forces to compression - **Pros**: Simple, inexpensive, reliable for this pattern - **Cons**: 80% hardware removal rate due to prominence **Option 2: Plate Fixation** - Precontoured olecranon plate with proximal locking screws - Lower hardware removal rate - Better for comminuted patterns (though not needed here) **My Recommendation:** For this young man with a simple transverse pattern, either option is reasonable. I would discuss both, including the high hardware removal rate with TBW, and let him participate in the decision. **Postoperative:** Early active ROM when wounds permit. Avoid resisted extension for 6 weeks.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
This is a Mayo Type IIA fracture - displaced, stable, non-comminuted
5mm step-off is clearly surgical indication (threshold 2mm)
Cannot extend against gravity confirms extensor mechanism disruption
Both TBW and plate fixation are reasonable options
TBW technique: parallel K-wires (intramedullary or bicortical), figure-of-8 wire
K-wires should engage anterior cortex to work as tension band
Alternative: plate fixation - lower hardware complication rate
Post-op: early active ROM, avoid resisted extension 6 weeks
Counsel about 80% hardware removal rate with TBW
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not recognizing this as surgical indication
✗Describing incorrect TBW technique (wire must be on tension side)
✗Forgetting to counsel about hardware prominence
✗Using TBW for a comminuted fracture (wrong indication)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"If this were a comminuted fracture (Mayo IIB), would you still use tension band wiring?"
"What would you change?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Trans-Olecranon Fracture-Dislocation

EXAMINER

"A 72-year-old woman with osteoporosis falls and sustains a comminuted olecranon fracture. The lateral X-ray shows the ulna is anteriorly subluxated relative to the trochlea. How do you manage this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Thank you. This is a more complex injury than a simple olecranon fracture. The key finding is the **anterior subluxation of the ulna** - this indicates a **trans-olecranon fracture-dislocation**. **Recognition:** This is distinct from: - Simple olecranon fracture (no ulnohumeral subluxation) - Monteggia fracture-dislocation (ulnar fracture is more proximal in Monteggia) The anterior ulnar subluxation indicates disruption of the **ulnohumeral joint congruity** - this is an unstable injury pattern that must be addressed surgically. **Imaging:** I would obtain a **CT scan** to: - Assess the degree of olecranon comminution - Evaluate the coronoid for associated fracture - Check the radial head for associated injury - Plan the surgical approach and fixation **Management:** This requires **plate fixation** - tension band wiring is contraindicated for this complex pattern because: - TBW requires an intact anterior cortex as a hinge - The comminution and ulnohumeral subluxation preclude TBW biomechanics - TBW cannot restore ulnohumeral joint congruity **Surgical Goals:** 1. Reduce the ulnohumeral joint - restore articular congruity 2. Fix the olecranon with a precontoured **locking plate** (essential in osteoporotic bone) 3. Address any coronoid or radial head injuries 4. Achieve stable construct allowing early ROM **Postoperative:** Early motion once stable fixation is achieved is essential to prevent stiffness. Outcomes are generally good if ulnohumeral congruity is restored.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
This is a trans-olecranon fracture-dislocation, not simple olecranon fracture
Anterior ulnar subluxation indicates ulnohumeral joint disruption
Must distinguish from Monteggia (fracture more proximal in Monteggia)
CT scan helpful to assess comminution and pattern
Plate fixation required - TBW inadequate for this pattern
Surgical goals: reduce ulnohumeral joint, fix olecranon, restore stability
In osteoporotic bone, locking plate preferred
Check coronoid and radial head for associated injuries
Post-op: early motion once stable fixation achieved
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing the anterior subluxation - treating as simple olecranon fracture
✗Using tension band wiring for this complex pattern
✗Not getting CT for surgical planning
✗Forgetting to assess for associated injuries
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the elderly patient had severe articular comminution and was low-demand?"
"Would you consider fragment excision?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Hardware Complication

EXAMINER

"A patient returns 3 months after TBW for an olecranon fracture. They have united but have prominent hardware causing pain and skin irritation. The K-wire is backing out. What is your management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Thank you. This is a **very common complication** of tension band wiring - approximately **80% of patients** require hardware removal due to prominence. The migrating K-wire adds urgency to this case. **Assessment:** First, I need to confirm **fracture union** both clinically and radiographically before considering hardware removal: - **Clinically**: No tenderness at fracture site, full ROM, able to extend against resistance - **Radiographically**: Bridging callus, trabecular crossing on X-ray **Concerns with Migrating K-wire:** The backing out K-wire is concerning as it can: - Cause **skin perforation** and potential deep infection - Migrate into soft tissues causing injury - Indicate inadequate initial technique (wires not engaging anterior cortex) **Management:** If union is confirmed, I would proceed with **hardware removal**: **Surgical Technique:** 1. Same posterior approach through healed incision 2. Identify and remove the figure-of-8 wire 3. Remove both K-wires completely 4. Inspect the fracture site for union - if any concern, consider CT 5. Irrigate and close **Postoperative Care:** - **Protect from re-fracture**: Avoid heavy lifting for 6 weeks - Counsel about small risk of re-fracture through the residual wire holes - The K-wire holes weaken the bone temporarily until remodeling **Important Point:** If the K-wire is **threatening to perforate skin imminently**, this becomes more urgent to prevent converting to an open wound and potential septic complication.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
This is a common complication of TBW - 80% require hardware removal
First confirm union clinically and radiographically
Migrating K-wire is concerning - can cause soft tissue injury
Plan for hardware removal
Surgical technique: same posterior incision
Remove wire and K-wires completely
Check for any underlying nonunion or hardware failure
Protect from re-fracture - no heavy lifting for 6 weeks post-removal
Counsel: small risk of re-fracture through screw holes
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not confirming union before hardware removal
✗Leaving hardware in despite significant symptoms
✗Not warning about re-fracture risk after removal
✗Not addressing migrating K-wire urgently if threatening skin
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the X-ray showed nonunion at the olecranon?"
"How would your management change?"

MCQ Practice Points

Classification Question

Q: According to the Mayo classification, what defines a Type III olecranon fracture? A: Displaced fracture with elbow instability. Type I = undisplaced, Type II = displaced but stable, Type III = displaced and unstable. Subtype A = non-comminuted, B = comminuted.

Biomechanics Question

Q: How does tension band wiring work? A: The figure-of-8 wire converts tensile forces (from triceps pull) to compressive forces at the articular surface. This requires an intact anterior cortex to act as a fulcrum/hinge. With elbow flexion, compression increases at the fracture site.

Technique Question

Q: Where should the K-wires engage in tension band wiring? A: The K-wires should engage the anterior cortex of the ulna distally. This creates a more stable construct. Intramedullary placement with engagement of anterior cortex is preferred.

Indication Question

Q: When is plate fixation preferred over tension band wiring for olecranon fractures? A: Oblique fractures (greater than 30 degrees), comminuted fractures, osteoporotic bone, Monteggia variants, trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations, and Mayo Type III (unstable).

Complication Question

Q: What is the approximate rate of hardware removal after tension band wiring for olecranon fractures? A: 80%. Hardware prominence is very common due to the subcutaneous position of the olecranon. Plate fixation has lower removal rates (20-30%).

Australian Context

Epidemiology:

  • Common injury in falls, cycling, and contact sports
  • Bimodal distribution similar to international data
  • Increasing elderly population with osteoporotic fractures

Management considerations:

  • Day surgery often possible for straightforward fixation
  • Consideration of plate vs TBW may depend on resources
  • Hardware removal is a separate procedure

Rehabilitation:

  • Hand therapy referral standard practice
  • Occupational therapy for return to work/ADLs
  • WorkCover considerations for occupational injuries

Exam Context

Be prepared to discuss TBW versus plate fixation with indications for each. Understand that plate fixation is increasingly favored due to lower re-operation rates. Know the biomechanics of tension band principle.

OLECRANON FRACTURES

High-Yield Exam Summary

KEY CONCEPTS

  • •Triceps insertion - extensor mechanism disruption
  • •Articular fracture - affects ulnohumeral joint
  • •Subcutaneous - high hardware prominence
  • •2mm step-off threshold for surgery

MAYO CLASSIFICATION

  • •Type I: Undisplaced (less than 2mm)
  • •Type II: Displaced, stable (A = simple, B = comminuted)
  • •Type III: Displaced, unstable (A = simple, B = comminuted)
  • •Stability = ulnohumeral joint status

TBW INDICATIONS

  • •Simple transverse or short oblique fracture
  • •Non-comminuted (Mayo IIA)
  • •Intact anterior cortex (for tension band to work)
  • •Accept 80% hardware removal rate

PLATE INDICATIONS

  • •Oblique fracture (greater than 30 degrees)
  • •Comminuted (Mayo IIB, IIIB)
  • •Osteoporotic bone
  • •Trans-olecranon fracture-dislocation
  • •Mayo Type III (unstable)

TBW TECHNIQUE

  • •Two parallel K-wires (1.6-2.0mm)
  • •Intramedullary or bicortical - engage anterior cortex
  • •Figure-of-8 wire (1.0-1.2mm)
  • •Wire deep to triceps, superficial to K-wires
  • •Tension wire on posterior (tension) side

TRAPS AND PEARLS

  • •TBW only for simple patterns - plate for comminution
  • •Check for trans-olecranon subluxation on lateral
  • •80% TBW hardware removal - counsel pre-op
  • •Anterior cortex must be intact for TBW to work
  • •Early motion essential to prevent stiffness
Quick Stats
Reading Time90 min
Related Topics

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures