Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Patellofemoral Instability

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Patellofemoral Instability

Comprehensive exam-ready guide to patellofemoral instability - MPFL reconstruction, trochlear dysplasia, tibial tubercle osteotomy

complete
Updated: 2025-12-17
High Yield Overview

PATELLOFEMORAL INSTABILITY

MPFL | Trochlear Dysplasia | TT-TG Distance | Surgical Options

MPFLPrimary restraint (50-60%)
20mmTT-TG threshold
DejourDysplasia classification
50%Recurrence after 1st dislocation

DEJOUR TROCHLEAR DYSPLASIA

Type A
PatternShallow trochlea, crossing sign
TreatmentSoft tissue +/- bony
Type B
PatternFlat trochlea, supratrochlear spur
TreatmentLikely bony procedure
Type C
PatternAsymmetric facets, double contour
TreatmentBony procedure required
Type D
PatternCliff pattern, vertical facet
TreatmentTrochleoplasty considered

Critical Must-Knows

  • MPFL is the PRIMARY soft tissue restraint to lateral patellar translation (50-60%)
  • MPFL ruptures in almost ALL acute patellar dislocations
  • TT-TG greater than 20mm indicates lateral malalignment needing tibial tubercle osteotomy
  • Trochlear dysplasia is the most common anatomical risk factor
  • First-time dislocators: conservative unless loose body or osteochondral fragment

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    MPFL attaches just distal to adductor tubercle on femur
  • "
    Patella alta (Insall-Salvati greater than 1.2) increases instability
  • "
    Recurrence rate 50% after first dislocation, 80% after second
  • "
    Combined procedures often needed for significant anatomical abnormalities

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

(a) Intraoperative findings illustrating dislocation of rotating hinge stem. (b) Intraoperative opening of the flexion gap causing dislocation.
Click to expand
(a) Intraoperative findings illustrating dislocation of rotating hinge stem. (b) Intraoperative opening of the flexion gap causing dislocation.Credit: Manzano G et al. via Case Rep Orthop via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Bisect offset. (A) Patellar and trochlear computed tomography images were different. The trochlear bisect line was drawn on the slice with the best trochlear profile. (B) The trochlear bisect line was
Click to expand
Bisect offset. (A) Patellar and trochlear computed tomography images were different. The trochlear bisect line was drawn on the slice with the best trCredit: Open-i / NIH via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
The Schottle's point at the center of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). Two lines perpendiculars to line 1 are drawn, intersecting the contact point of the medial condyle and the posterior co
Click to expand
The Schottle's point at the center of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). Two lines perpendiculars to line 1 are drawn, intersecting the contacCredit: Kyung HS et al. via Knee Surg Relat Res via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Exam Concepts

MPFL is KEY

MPFL provides 50-60% of restraint to lateral patellar translation in the first 30° of flexion. It ruptures in almost all acute dislocations and is the target of surgical reconstruction.

Anatomical Risk Factors

Must assess ALL factors: Trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, increased TT-TG distance, femoral anteversion, genu valgum, rotational malalignment. Failure to address leads to recurrence.

TT-TG Distance

Normal is less than 20mm. Greater than 20mm = pathological lateral offset. Indicates need for tibial tubercle osteotomy (medialization +/- distalization) in addition to MPFL reconstruction.

First Dislocation Management

Most first-time dislocators: conservative treatment. Surgery indicated for: osteochondral loose body, large chondral/MPFL avulsion, recurrent instability, or high-risk anatomy.

Quick Decision Guide

Clinical ScenarioKey FactorTreatmentAdditional Procedures
First dislocationNo loose bodyConservative 6 weeksNone usually
First dislocationOsteochondral fragmentSurgery - fix fragment + MPFLAddress fragment
Recurrent instabilityNormal anatomyMPFL reconstructionMay be sufficient alone
Recurrent instabilityTT-TG greater than 20mmMPFL + tibial tubercle osteotomyMedialization required
Recurrent instabilitySevere dysplasia (B-D)MPFL + consider trochleoplastyBony correction needed
Mnemonic

PATELLAAnatomical Risk Factors

P
Patella alta
Insall-Salvati greater than 1.2
A
Anteversion
Femoral anteversion increases Q angle
T
Trochlear dysplasia
Dejour classification A-D
E
Excessive TT-TG
Greater than 20mm = pathological
L
Ligament laxity
Generalized hypermobility
L
Lateral tilt
Patella tilts laterally
A
Alignment (valgus)
Genu valgum increases lateral vector

Memory Hook:The PATELLA itself tells you all the risk factors!

Mnemonic

SAFEMPFL Femoral Attachment

S
Schoettle point
Radiographic landmark for femoral tunnel
A
Adductor tubercle
Just distal and anterior to this
F
Femoral origin
Between adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle
E
Essential for isometry
Correct placement prevents graft failure

Memory Hook:SAFE femoral tunnel placement is essential for MPFL reconstruction!

Mnemonic

FLAPIndications for Surgery After First Dislocation

F
Fragment
Osteochondral loose body needs fixation or removal
L
Large MPFL avulsion
Bony avulsion requiring fixation
A
Anatomical abnormality
High-risk anatomy predicting recurrence
P
Professional athlete
May consider early stabilization

Memory Hook:Fix the FLAP - surgical indications after first dislocation!

Overview and Epidemiology

Recurrence Risk

First dislocation: 50% recurrence risk. Second dislocation: 80%+ recurrence risk. This dramatic increase after second dislocation justifies earlier surgical intervention in recurrent cases. Anatomical risk factors predict higher recurrence.

Epidemiology

  • Incidence: 7-77 per 100,000/year
  • Peak age: 15-19 years (adolescents)
  • Females greater than males in some studies
  • Often during sports/pivoting activities
  • Strong association with anatomical abnormalities

Mechanism

  • Twisting on planted foot with knee flexed
  • Valgus force with external rotation
  • Direct blow to medial patella (rare)
  • May occur with minimal trauma if dysplastic
  • MPFL ruptures in essentially all cases

Pathophysiology and Anatomy

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament

Primary restraint: Provides 50-60% of restraint to lateral patellar translation in first 30° of flexion.

Femoral attachment: Between adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle (Schoettle point).

Patellar attachment: Proximal 2/3 of medial patella border, blends with VMO.

Length: Approximately 55mm.

Function: Most important in early flexion (0-30°) when patella not yet in trochlea.

Trochlear Anatomy

Normal trochlea: Concave groove that accepts patella during flexion.

Trochlear dysplasia: Flat or convex trochlea - patella has no bony constraint.

Engagement: Patella engages trochlea by 20-30° of flexion.

Sulcus angle: Angle between trochlear facets. Normal less than 145°.

Lateral trochlear inclination: Angle of lateral facet. Low angle = dysplasia.

Alignment Factors

TT-TG distance: Tibial tubercle to trochlear groove distance on CT/MRI. Normal less than 20mm.

Patella alta: High-riding patella (Insall-Salvati greater than 1.2). Delays engagement.

Q angle: Quadriceps vector. Increased with valgus/femoral anteversion.

Femoral anteversion: Internal rotation of femur increases lateral patellar vector.

MPFL Femoral Tunnel Placement

Correct femoral tunnel placement is CRITICAL for MPFL reconstruction. The Schoettle point is just distal and anterior to the adductor tubercle, between the posterior cortex of the medial femoral condyle and the posterior edge of Blumensaat line. Malposition leads to graft failure or patellofemoral overload.

Classification Systems

Dejour Trochlear Dysplasia Classification

TypeRadiograph/CT FindingTrochlear MorphologySurgical Implication
ACrossing sign onlyShallow trochleaMPFL may suffice
BCrossing sign + supratrochlear spurFlat trochleaConsider bony procedure
CCrossing sign + double contourAsymmetric facetsBony procedure likely needed
DAll above + cliff patternConvex trochleaTrochleoplasty may be needed

Crossing sign: Trochlear groove crosses anterior femoral cortex on lateral radiograph (most sensitive finding).

Key Measurements

TT-TG distance: Measured on axial CT or MRI. Normal less than 20mm. Greater than 20mm = pathological.

Patella alta (Insall-Salvati): Patellar tendon length divided by patellar length. Greater than 1.2 = alta. Greater than 1.4 = severe.

Caton-Deschamps index: Distance from inferior patellar articular surface to tibial plateau divided by patellar articular surface length. Greater than 1.2 = alta.

Sulcus angle: Angle between trochlear facets. Greater than 145° = dysplasia.

Lateral trochlear inclination: Less than 11° indicates dysplasia.

MPFL Rupture Location

Femoral side: Most common (50-65%). Often bony avulsion.

Patellar side: Less common. May be avulsion from proximal patella.

Mid-substance: Least common.

Combined: Can have multiple tear sites.

MRI determines tear pattern for surgical planning.

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Mechanism: Twisting, pivoting injury
  • Sensation: Often describe patella moving laterally
  • Spontaneous reduction: Usually reduces on extension
  • Swelling: Immediate hemarthrosis common
  • Previous dislocations: Recurrence history

Examination

  • Effusion: Hemarthrosis if acute
  • Apprehension test: Positive with lateral pressure
  • J-sign: Lateral tracking in terminal extension
  • Q-angle: Increased suggests malalignment
  • Generalized laxity: Beighton score

Apprehension Test

With the knee in 30° flexion, apply lateral force to the patella. Positive test: patient resists or shows apprehension (fear of dislocation). This is the most reliable clinical sign of patellofemoral instability.

Examination Checklist

Alignment: Valgus, femoral anteversion, tibial torsion.

Patella tracking: J-sign, lateral tilt, subluxation.

Ligament laxity: Beighton score for generalized hypermobility.

Contralateral knee: Often bilateral predisposition.

Investigations

Standard Views

AP weight-bearing: Valgus alignment assessment.

Lateral: Trochlear dysplasia (crossing sign, supratrochlear spur), patella alta (Insall-Salvati).

Skyline/Merchant: Patellar tilt, subluxation, trochlear morphology.

Long leg alignment: If considering osteotomy for valgus.

Key radiograph findings: Crossing sign on lateral is most sensitive for dysplasia.

MRI Assessment

MPFL tear: Location (femoral, patellar, mid-substance) and extent.

Osteochondral injury: Medial patella, lateral femoral condyle (kissing contusion).

Loose bodies: Cartilage/bone fragments in joint.

Trochlear morphology: Dysplasia assessment.

Edema pattern: Medial patellar and lateral condyle edema classic for acute dislocation.

CT Measurements

TT-TG distance: Most accurate on axial CT. Measure from deepest point of trochlear groove to tibial tubercle.

TT-PCL distance: Alternative measurement less affected by trochlear dysplasia.

Rotational profile: Femoral anteversion, tibial torsion.

Trochlear morphology: 3D reconstruction helpful for surgical planning.

Classic MRI Findings

Acute patellar dislocation MRI: MPFL tear (usually femoral side), bone marrow edema medial patella AND lateral femoral condyle (kissing contusion pattern), possible osteochondral fragment, hemarthrosis. This pattern is pathognomonic.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Patellofemoral instability management algorithm flowchart
Click to expand
Management algorithm: First dislocation without osteochondral fragment - physiotherapy. Recurrent dislocation or TT-TG greater than 20mm or trochlear dysplasia - MPFL reconstruction ± tibial tubercle osteotomy. Severe dysplasia - consider trochleoplasty.Credit: OrthoVellum

First-Time Patellar Dislocation

Management Pathway

AcuteReduction and Assessment

Usually self-reduces with knee extension. Aspiration if tense effusion. Radiographs to rule out fracture/loose body. MRI to assess MPFL and osteochondral injury.

ConservativeNon-Operative Management

If no loose body: brace in extension 2-4 weeks, then progressive ROM and quadriceps strengthening. Full recovery 6-12 weeks. 50% recurrence risk with conservative treatment.

SurgicalSurgical Indications

Osteochondral loose body (fix or remove), large bony MPFL avulsion, high-risk anatomy, or professional athlete may warrant early MPFL repair or reconstruction.

Conservative treatment is appropriate for most first-time dislocators without loose bodies.

Recurrent Patellar Instability

Surgical Decision-Making

AssessmentAnatomical Evaluation

CT for TT-TG, MRI for soft tissue, radiographs for dysplasia. Identify ALL anatomical risk factors before surgery.

Soft TissueMPFL Reconstruction

Standard procedure for recurrent instability. Address lateral retinacular tightness if present. May be sufficient alone if anatomy is favorable.

BonyAdditional Bony Procedures

TT-TG greater than 20mm: tibial tubercle osteotomy (medialization). Patella alta: distalization. Severe dysplasia: consider trochleoplasty.

Procedure Selection Algorithm

TT-TG less than 20mm, no dysplasia: MPFL reconstruction alone.

TT-TG greater than 20mm: MPFL reconstruction + tibial tubercle medialization.

Patella alta: MPFL reconstruction + tibial tubercle distalization (or combined with medialization).

Severe dysplasia (Dejour B-D): MPFL reconstruction + consider trochleoplasty (controversial, technically demanding).

Combined abnormalities: May need MPFL + TTO + other procedures.

Surgical Technique

MPFL Reconstruction Technique

Surgical Steps

Step 1Graft Harvest

Gracilis or semitendinosus autograft (most common). Allograft option. Quadriceps tendon strip gaining popularity.

Step 2Patellar Fixation

Two tunnels in proximal 2/3 of medial patella. Suture anchors or interference screws. Avoid full-thickness tunnels.

Step 3Femoral Tunnel

Schoettle point: between adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle. Fluoroscopy to confirm (intersection of posterior femoral cortex and Blumensaat line).

Step 4Graft Tensioning

Tension with knee at 30-60° flexion. Avoid overtensioning (causes PF overload). Confirm full flexion and patella tracking before final fixation.

Femoral Tunnel Position

Correct femoral tunnel placement is THE most important technical factor. The Schoettle point on fluoroscopy: where the posterior femoral cortex line meets the posterior extent of Blumensaat line. Anterior or distal malposition causes graft failure or patellofemoral overload.

Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy (TTO)

Indications: TT-TG greater than 20mm, patella alta, lateral patellar facet overload.

Medialization: For TT-TG greater than 20mm. Reduces Q-angle.

Distalization (Maquet): For patella alta. Engages patella earlier.

Anteromedialization (Fulkerson): Combined approach for lateral facet OA with malalignment.

Technique: Oblique osteotomy, shift tubercle medially/distally, fix with screws; protect weight-bearing 6 weeks.

Trochleoplasty (for Severe Dysplasia)

Indication: Dejour Type B-D dysplasia with convex or flat trochlea.

Sulcus deepening: Create concave groove by removing subchondral bone and impacting cartilage into deepened sulcus.

Technique: Technically demanding. Risk of cartilage damage and arthrofibrosis.

Outcomes: Improving in literature but remains controversial. Reserved for severe dysplasia.

Alternative: Some prefer lateral facet elevation or recession procedures.

Avoid Overtensioning MPFL

Overtensioning the MPFL graft leads to increased patellofemoral contact pressures and accelerated cartilage wear. Tension with knee in 30-60° flexion, ensure patella can still translate one quadrant laterally, and confirm full flexion before final fixation.

Complications

ComplicationCausePreventionManagement
Recurrent instabilityMissed anatomical factor, tunnel malpositionAddress all risk factors, correct tunnel placementRevision surgery addressing missed factors
Patellofemoral pain/OAOvertensioned graft, tunnel malpositionProper tensioning, correct tunnel positionGraft release, revision if severe
StiffnessOvertensioning, prolonged immobilizationEarly ROM, proper tensioningPhysical therapy, MUA if needed
Patellar fractureFull-thickness patellar tunnelsPartial thickness tunnels or anchorsORIF
Graft failureTunnel malposition, early return to sportCorrect technique, appropriate rehabRevision reconstruction

Most Common Cause of Failure

Femoral tunnel malposition is the most common cause of MPFL reconstruction failure. Anterior or distal placement changes graft isometry, leading to graft laxity in flexion or patellofemoral overload. Always confirm Schoettle point with intraoperative fluoroscopy.

Postoperative Care

Rehabilitation Protocol

Week 0-2Protection Phase

Brace locked in extension for ambulation. ROM exercises 0-90° out of brace. WBAT with crutches. CPM if available.

Week 2-6Early Motion

Progressive ROM to full. Unlock brace. Wean crutches. Quadriceps strengthening, VMO focus. No resisted knee extension 0-45°.

Week 6-12Strengthening

Full weight-bearing, no brace. Progressive closed chain strengthening. Stationary bike, pool exercises.

Month 3-6Sport-Specific

Running at 3-4 months if strength adequate. Sport-specific training. Full return 6-9 months.

Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy Modifications

If TTO performed: protected weight-bearing for 6-8 weeks until osteotomy healed. Confirm radiographic healing before advancing to full weight-bearing. May delay return to sport.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Prognostic Factors

Good prognosis:

  • Isolated MPFL rupture without dysplasia
  • Normal TT-TG distance
  • First or second dislocation
  • Compliance with rehabilitation
  • Correct surgical technique

Poor prognosis:

  • Severe trochlear dysplasia (Dejour C-D)
  • Multiple dislocations with cartilage damage
  • Uncorrected anatomical abnormalities
  • Generalized ligamentous laxity
  • Tunnel malposition

Evidence Base and Key Studies

Natural History of First Dislocation

4
Fithian DC et al. • Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective study of 189 first-time dislocations
  • 17% overall redislocation rate with conservative treatment
  • Younger patients (less than 15) had higher recurrence
  • No difference in outcomes between operative and non-operative initially
Clinical Implication: Conservative treatment is appropriate for most first-time dislocations.
Limitation: Observational study, selection bias possible.

MPFL Reconstruction Outcomes

2
Schneider DK et al. • Orthop J Sports Med (2016)
Key Findings:
  • Meta-analysis of 25 studies, 1130 knees
  • Redislocation rate 1.1% after MPFL reconstruction
  • Complications 10.5%, most were minor
  • High satisfaction and return to sport rates
Clinical Implication: MPFL reconstruction is highly effective for preventing recurrent instability.
Limitation: Heterogeneous studies, variable techniques.

Combined MPFL and TTO

4
Magnussen RA et al. • J Knee Surg (2012)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of combined procedures
  • 0-4.5% redislocation rate with combined approach
  • Better outcomes when addressing bony abnormalities
  • TTO reduces recurrence in patients with elevated TT-TG
Clinical Implication: Address anatomical abnormalities for best outcomes.
Limitation: Heterogeneous inclusion criteria.

Trochleoplasty Outcomes

4
Dejour D et al. • Am J Sports Med (2013)
Key Findings:
  • Sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty in 45 knees
  • 2% redislocation rate at 7-year follow-up
  • Significant improvement in functional scores
  • Complications included stiffness and cartilage damage
Clinical Implication: Trochleoplasty is effective for severe dysplasia but technically demanding.
Limitation: Single surgeon series, selection bias.

Schoettle Point Validation

3
Schoettle PB et al. • Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2007)
Key Findings:
  • Cadaveric study defining optimal femoral tunnel position
  • Intersection of posterior cortex and Blumensaat line on lateral fluoroscopy
  • 1mm proximal to medial epicondyle, 2.5mm posterior
  • Isometric point minimizes length change with flexion
Clinical Implication: Schoettle point is the reference for femoral tunnel placement.
Limitation: Cadaveric study, anatomical variation.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: First Patellar Dislocation

EXAMINER

"A 16-year-old netball player presents after her knee gave way while pivoting. She felt the patella move laterally and it reduced when she extended her knee. There is a moderate effusion. Radiographs show no fracture. How would you manage this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a typical first-time lateral patellar dislocation in a young athlete. My approach would begin with a thorough history and examination. I would assess for generalized ligamentous laxity (Beighton score), lower limb alignment, and perform the patellar apprehension test. Given the moderate effusion, I would aspirate the hemarthrosis for comfort and to assess for fat globules suggesting osteochondral injury. I would obtain an MRI to evaluate the MPFL tear pattern, assess for any osteochondral fragment (medial patella or lateral femoral condyle), and evaluate trochlear morphology. If the MRI shows no loose body or significant osteochondral injury, I would recommend conservative treatment: immobilization in a brace locked in extension for 2-4 weeks to allow MPFL healing, followed by progressive ROM and VMO-focused strengthening rehabilitation. I would counsel her about the approximately 50% recurrence risk with conservative treatment and that surgery (MPFL reconstruction) would be indicated if she has further dislocations. Return to sport would be at 6-12 weeks depending on quadriceps strength recovery.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Most first-time dislocations treated conservatively
MRI essential to rule out osteochondral injury
50% recurrence risk with conservative treatment
Aspirate hemarthrosis for diagnosis and comfort
VMO-focused rehabilitation is key
COMMON TRAPS
✗Rushing to surgery without MRI assessment
✗Missing an osteochondral fragment
✗Not counseling about recurrence risk
✗Not assessing for anatomical risk factors
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if MRI shows a 2cm osteochondral fragment in the joint?"
"What anatomical factors would make you consider early surgery?"
"What is the role of the MPFL?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Recurrent Instability

EXAMINER

"A 22-year-old woman has had 4 patellar dislocations in the past 2 years. Examination shows positive apprehension, no significant valgus. CT shows TT-TG of 24mm. Radiographs show Dejour Type A trochlear dysplasia. What would you recommend?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is recurrent patellar instability with multiple anatomical risk factors. Conservative treatment is no longer appropriate after multiple dislocations. My recommendation would be surgical stabilization with combined procedures. The TT-TG of 24mm is pathologically elevated (greater than 20mm threshold), indicating the need for tibial tubercle medialization in addition to soft tissue reconstruction. The Dejour Type A dysplasia (crossing sign only, shallow trochlea) is the mildest form and would not typically require trochleoplasty. My surgical plan would be MPFL reconstruction combined with tibial tubercle medialization. For MPFL, I would use gracilis or semitendinosus autograft, with careful attention to the femoral tunnel position at the Schoettle point. For the tibial tubercle osteotomy, I would perform an oblique osteotomy and medialize approximately 10mm to normalize the TT-TG to under 15mm, then fix with screws. Postoperatively, she would be weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) in a brace but with protected weight-bearing for 6 weeks for the osteotomy to heal. ROM would start immediately but no resisted extension in terminal range. Return to sport at 6-9 months.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
TT-TG greater than 20mm requires tibial tubercle medialization
MPFL reconstruction is standard for recurrent instability
Combined procedures for multiple anatomical abnormalities
Type A dysplasia usually does not require trochleoplasty
Osteotomy requires protected weight-bearing
COMMON TRAPS
✗Doing MPFL reconstruction alone without addressing TT-TG
✗Over-aggressive trochleoplasty for mild dysplasia
✗Not confirming femoral tunnel position intraoperatively
✗Allowing full weight-bearing too early after TTO
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you confirm correct femoral tunnel position?"
"What if TT-TG was 18mm?"
"What complications are specific to tibial tubercle osteotomy?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Failed MPFL Reconstruction

EXAMINER

"A 19-year-old male had MPFL reconstruction 18 months ago but has had 2 further dislocations since. Examination shows persistent apprehension. CT shows TT-TG of 16mm. Review of operative notes shows the femoral tunnel was placed at the medial epicondyle. What is your assessment?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is failed MPFL reconstruction, and the most likely cause is femoral tunnel malposition. The operative note describes the tunnel at the medial epicondyle, which is too anterior and distal. The correct position is the Schoettle point, which is between the adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle (approximately 1mm proximal to epicondyle, 2.5mm posterior). An anteriorly placed tunnel will cause graft laxity in flexion (when the native MPFL is taut) and overtightening in extension, leading to recurrent instability and potential patellofemoral overload. The TT-TG of 16mm is within normal limits, so tibial tubercle osteotomy is not indicated. My recommendation would be revision MPFL reconstruction with correct femoral tunnel placement. I would obtain CT to precisely map the existing tunnel and plan the new tunnel position at the anatomic Schoettle point. At surgery, I would harvest new graft (allograft if autografts exhausted), create a new femoral tunnel in the correct position (may need bone grafting of old tunnel if close), and fix into new tunnels. Intraoperative fluoroscopy is essential to confirm the Schoettle point. Postoperative rehabilitation would be similar to primary reconstruction with return to sport at 6-9 months.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Femoral tunnel malposition is most common cause of failure
Schoettle point is correct location (not medial epicondyle)
Anterior tunnel causes laxity in flexion
TT-TG is normal - no need for TTO
Revision requires correct tunnel placement
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not identifying the cause of failure
✗Adding TTO when TT-TG is normal
✗Placing new tunnel in same malpositioned location
✗Not using fluoroscopy for tunnel confirmation
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Where exactly is the Schoettle point on fluoroscopy?"
"What would you do if the old tunnel overlaps with correct position?"
"What graft would you use for revision?"

MCQ Practice Points

MPFL Function

Q: What percent of restraint to lateral patellar translation does the MPFL provide? A: 50-60% of restraint in the first 30° of flexion. It is the primary soft tissue restraint and ruptures in almost all acute dislocations.

TT-TG Threshold

Q: What TT-TG distance is considered pathological? A: Greater than 20mm. This indicates need for tibial tubercle medialization in addition to MPFL reconstruction.

Recurrence Rate

Q: What is the recurrence rate after a first patellar dislocation treated conservatively? A: Approximately 50%. After a second dislocation, the rate increases to 80%+.

MPFL Attachment

Q: Where does the MPFL attach on the femur? A: Between the adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle at the Schoettle point. This is just distal and anterior to the adductor tubercle.

Patella Alta

Q: What Insall-Salvati ratio indicates patella alta? A: Greater than 1.2. Normal is 0.8-1.2. Patella alta delays patellar engagement in the trochlea.

Dejour Classification

Q: What radiographic finding is common to all Dejour types of trochlear dysplasia? A: The crossing sign - where the trochlear groove line crosses the anterior femoral cortex on lateral radiograph.

Australian Context

Clinical Practice

  • MPFL reconstruction widely performed
  • Gracilis autograft most common
  • TTO for TT-TG greater than 20mm
  • Trochleoplasty at specialist centres only
  • Increasing use of fluoroscopy for tunnel placement

Funding and Access

  • Allografts may incur additional cost
  • Specialist referral for recurrent cases
  • Public system wait times variable
  • Private insurance covers most procedures

Orthopaedic Exam Relevance

Patellofemoral instability is a common viva topic. Know the MPFL anatomy, TT-TG threshold (20mm), Dejour classification, and be able to articulate a systematic approach to surgical planning addressing all anatomical abnormalities.

PATELLOFEMORAL INSTABILITY

High-Yield Exam Summary

MPFL Anatomy

  • •Primary restraint 50-60% (first 30° flexion)
  • •Femoral attachment: Schoettle point
  • •Between adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle
  • •Ruptures in almost all acute dislocations

Risk Factors (PATELLA)

  • •Patella alta (Insall-Salvati greater than 1.2)
  • •Anteversion (femoral)
  • •Trochlear dysplasia (Dejour A-D)
  • •Excessive TT-TG (greater than 20mm)

Measurements

  • •TT-TG: Normal less than 20mm
  • •Insall-Salvati: Normal 0.8-1.2
  • •Crossing sign: Trochlear dysplasia marker
  • •Sulcus angle: greater than 145° = dysplasia

Treatment Algorithm

  • •First dislocation no loose body: Conservative
  • •Recurrent, normal anatomy: MPFL reconstruction
  • •TT-TG greater than 20mm: MPFL + TTO medialization
  • •Patella alta: MPFL + TTO distalization

MPFL Reconstruction Keys

  • •Femoral tunnel at Schoettle point (CRITICAL)
  • •Tension at 30-60° flexion
  • •Avoid overtensioning
  • •Confirm full flexion before fixation

Prognosis

  • •50% recurrence after 1st dislocation
  • •80%+ recurrence after 2nd dislocation
  • •80-95% success with MPFL reconstruction
  • •Tunnel malposition = most common failure cause
Quick Stats
Reading Time79 min
Related Topics

AC Joint Injuries in Athletes

Achilles Tendinopathy

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Anterior Shoulder Instability