Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Proximal Humerus Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Proximal Humerus Fractures

Comprehensive guide to proximal humerus fractures - Neer classification, blood supply, surgical decision-making, and PROFHER evidence for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2024-12-14
High Yield Overview

PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURES - NEER CLASSIFICATION

Four-Part Concept | Blood Supply Critical | PROFHER Shapes Treatment

4-5%Of all fractures
85%Minimally displaced (non-op)
15-35%AVN in 4-part fractures
1cm/45°Neer displacement criteria

NEER CLASSIFICATION

1-Part
PatternNo significant displacement
TreatmentNon-operative
2-Part
PatternOne fragment displaced
TreatmentConsider fixation
3-Part
PatternTwo fragments displaced
TreatmentORIF or arthroplasty
4-Part
PatternThree fragments displaced
TreatmentArthroplasty often

Critical Must-Knows

  • Neer classification based on 4 parts: head, greater tuberosity, lesser tuberosity, shaft
  • Displacement criteria: greater than 1cm translation or over 45° angulation
  • Arcuate artery (from anterior circumflex) is main blood supply to head - at risk in displaced fractures
  • PROFHER trial: No difference between operative and non-operative treatment at 2 years
  • 85% are minimally displaced and treated non-operatively with good outcomes

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Greater tuberosity displacement greater than 5mm in active patients warrants surgery
  • "
    Elderly 4-part fracture = reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is gold standard
  • "
    Valgus-impacted 4-part fractures have better blood supply - may be fixable
  • "
    Axillary nerve at risk - assess deltoid and lateral shoulder sensation

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

AP X-ray showing two-part proximal humerus fracture with surgical neck displacement
Click to expand
AP radiograph demonstrating a two-part surgical neck fracture of the proximal humerus with proximal and lateral displacement of the distal fragment. Note how the distal fragment displaces beyond the lateral cortex of the proximal fragment - this displacement pattern occurs due to pectoralis major pull.Credit: Berghs BM et al., Int J Shoulder Surg (PMC4772417) - CC-BY
Neer 4-part classification diagram showing the four anatomic segments
Click to expand
Neer's four-part classification conceptualized: (1) humeral head dome, (2) lesser tuberosity, (3) greater tuberosity, (4) diaphysis/shaft. A 'part' is displaced when separated by more than 1cm translation or more than 45 degrees angulation. Count displaced parts, not fracture lines.Credit: da Graça E et al., Acta Ortop Bras (PMC3862012) - CC-BY
CT coronal view showing valgus impacted proximal humerus fracture with plate fixation
Click to expand
CT coronal plane showing a valgus-impacted proximal humerus fracture after plate fixation. The greater tuberosity is positioned just beneath the acromion undersurface - this demonstrates why valgus-impacted fractures have better blood supply (head tilted into metaphysis preserving arcuate artery).Credit: Sano H et al., Case Rep Orthop (PMC4427088) - CC-BY
Coronal CT showing bilateral four-part proximal humerus fractures
Click to expand
Coronal CT of both shoulders demonstrating BILATERAL four-part proximal humerus fractures - an exceptionally rare presentation. Both humeral heads show severe comminution with separated greater and lesser tuberosities. Bilateral fractures may occur with seizures (bilateral simultaneous muscle contraction) or high-energy trauma. This case illustrates the importance of bilateral imaging when clinical suspicion exists.Credit: Ellanti P et al. - Case Rep Orthop (CC-BY 4.0)
5-panel surgical neck fracture treated with external fixation
Click to expand
5-panel (a-e) two-part surgical neck fracture treated with Joshi's External Stabilizing System (JESS): (a-b) Pre-operative AP and axillary views showing displaced surgical neck fracture; (c) Post-operative view with external fixator in place; (d-e) Final healed fracture at follow-up. External fixation is an alternative in resource-limited settings or for patients unable to tolerate internal fixation.Credit: Gupta AK et al. - Indian J Orthop (CC-BY 4.0)

Critical Proximal Humerus Fracture Exam Points

Blood Supply

Arcuate artery is terminal branch of anterior circumflex humeral artery. Enters at bicipital groove, runs in spiral to head. Disrupted in displaced fractures = AVN risk.

Neer Criteria

greater than 1cm displacement or over 45° angulation defines a displaced part. Count displaced parts, not fracture lines. 85% are 1-part (non-displaced).

PROFHER Evidence

Landmark UK trial: No functional difference at 2 years between surgical and non-surgical treatment for displaced fractures. Changed practice significantly.

Nerve at Risk

Axillary nerve runs 5-7cm below acromion. Test deltoid contraction and regimental badge sensation. At risk with anterior dislocation and surgery.

Quick Decision Guide

Patient ProfileFracture PatternKey ConsiderationTreatment
Any age1-part (non-displaced)85% of all proximal humerus fracturesSling, early ROM at 2 weeks
Young, active2-part surgical neckgreater than 1cm displacement or over 45° angulationORIF with plate or nails
Active patient2-part GT displacement greater than 5mmAffects rotator cuff functionORIF with screws/suture
Young (less than 65), good bone3-part or valgus-impacted 4-partHead viability more likelyORIF if reducible
Elderly (greater than 70)Displaced 3-part or 4-partHigh AVN risk, poor bone qualityReverse shoulder arthroplasty
Elderly, low demandAny displaced patternPROFHER supports non-opConsider non-operative
Mnemonic

HGLSNeer Four-Part Classification

H
Head (articular segment)
Main blood supply concern - AVN risk
G
Greater tuberosity
Supraspinatus and infraspinatus attach here
L
Lesser tuberosity
Subscapularis attachment
S
Shaft
Pectoralis major attaches, displaces shaft medially

Memory Hook:HGLS: Head Gets Less blood Supply when parts are displaced - count the separated parts!

Mnemonic

AAPAProximal Humerus Blood Supply

A
Anterior circumflex humeral artery
Gives rise to arcuate artery - main supply
A
Arcuate artery
Terminal vessel, enters at bicipital groove
P
Posterior circumflex humeral artery
Minor contribution, runs with axillary nerve
A
AVN if disrupted
15-35% in 4-part fractures, 3-14% in 3-part

Memory Hook:AAPA: Anterior gives Arcuate - Posterior helper - AVN if Absent!

Mnemonic

DRAGSSurgical Indications

D
Displacement greater than 1cm or 45 degrees
Neer criteria for displaced part
R
Rotator cuff compromise
GT displaced greater than 5mm affects function
A
Active young patient
Higher functional demands
G
Good bone quality
Needed for stable fixation
S
Shaft translation greater than 100%
Unable to reduce closed

Memory Hook:DRAGS: Displaced fractures DRAG young active patients to surgery if bone is good!

Mnemonic

MANSComplications

M
Malunion
Most common - especially GT malunion causing impingement
A
AVN (Avascular necrosis)
15-35% in 4-part, depends on head vascularity
N
Nerve injury (axillary)
5-7cm below acromion, test before surgery
S
Stiffness
Common post non-op and operative - early ROM key

Memory Hook:MANS: Malunion and AVN are the main concerns, Nerve injury and Stiffness complete the picture!

Overview and Epidemiology

Clinical Significance

Proximal humerus fractures are the third most common fracture in the elderly (after hip and distal radius). The PROFHER trial has fundamentally changed treatment approach - the majority can be treated non-operatively with equivalent outcomes to surgery.

Demographics

  • Bimodal distribution: young males (high-energy), elderly females (low-energy)
  • Peak incidence: 60-90 years
  • Female predominance increases with age
  • Strongly associated with osteoporosis

Mechanism

  • Low-energy fall onto outstretched hand (elderly) - 80%
  • High-energy trauma (young) - MVA, sports
  • Pathological fractures in metastatic disease
  • Associated injuries: rotator cuff, brachial plexus

Anatomy and Blood Supply

Blood Supply is Exam Critical

The arcuate artery (ascending branch of anterior circumflex humeral artery) provides the main blood supply to the humeral head. It enters the bone at the intertubercular groove and runs superiorly. Disruption leads to AVN - risk increases with displacement and number of parts.

Key Vascular Anatomy

VesselOriginCourseClinical Significance
Anterior circumflex humeralAxillary arteryWraps anterior to surgical neckGives arcuate artery - main supply
Arcuate arteryAnterolateral ascending branchEnters bicipital groove, spirals to headTerminal vessel - no collaterals
Posterior circumflex humeralAxillary arteryThrough quadrangular space with axillary nerveMinor head supply, greater tuberosity supply
Axillary arterySubclavian continuationBehind pectoralis minorAt risk in fracture-dislocations

Four Parts of Proximal Humerus

  • Articular segment (Head): Blood supply concern
  • Greater tuberosity: Supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor attach
  • Lesser tuberosity: Subscapularis attachment
  • Shaft: Pectoralis major, deltoid, latissimus attach

Muscle Forces

  • Supraspinatus: Pulls GT superiorly
  • Pectoralis major: Pulls shaft medially
  • Subscapularis: Internally rotates LT
  • Deltoid: May displace shaft laterally

Exam Trap: Axillary Nerve

The axillary nerve exits the quadrangular space and wraps around the surgical neck 5-7cm below the acromion. Always document deltoid function and regimental badge sensation. Incidence of injury is 5-10% in fractures, higher with dislocations.

Classification Systems

Neer Classification (1970)

Based on 4 anatomical segments and displacement criteria.

PartsDescriptionBlood SupplyTreatment Tendency
1-PartNo fragment meets displacement criteriaIntactNon-operative
2-PartOne fragment displaced (usually surgical neck or GT)Usually preservedORIF if indicated
3-PartTwo fragments displaced (head + one tuberosity attached)At riskORIF or arthroplasty
4-PartAll fragments separated (head isolated)High AVN riskArthroplasty preferred

Key Point

Count displaced parts, not fracture lines. A fracture can have multiple lines but if only one segment is displaced greater than 1cm or over 45°, it is a 2-part fracture. The head-split pattern and anatomic neck fractures have highest AVN risk.

AO/OTA Classification (11-A/B/C)

TypeDescriptionSubgroups
11-AUnifocal extra-articularA1: Tuberosity, A2: Impacted metaphyseal, A3: Non-impacted metaphyseal
11-BBifocal extra-articularB1: With metaphyseal impaction, B2: Without impaction, B3: With glenohumeral dislocation
11-CArticularC1: Slight displacement, C2: Marked displacement, C3: With dislocation

AO vs Neer

AO classification is more comprehensive but Neer is more commonly used clinically and in the orthopaedic exam. Be familiar with both but focus on Neer for treatment decision-making.

Special Fracture Patterns

PatternFeaturesPrognosisTreatment
Valgus-impacted 4-partHead tilted into valgus, tuberosities attached mediallyBetter blood supply preservedORIF often possible
Head-splittingSagittal or coronal head fracturePoor - high AVNArthroplasty
Anatomic neckFracture at articular marginVery high AVN riskArthroplasty
Fracture-dislocationAny pattern with dislocationVascular injury riskUrgent reduction, then treat fracture

Valgus-Impacted Pattern

Valgus-impacted 4-part fractures have the medial hinge (periosteum and vessels) intact, preserving blood supply to the head. These may be suitable for ORIF even though they are technically 4-part fractures. Look for the characteristic valgus tilt of the head with impaction into the metaphysis.

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Mechanism: FOOSH (low-energy), MVA (high-energy)
  • Arm position: Held adducted, supported by other hand
  • Pre-injury function: Activity level, dominant hand
  • Comorbidities: Osteoporosis, diabetes, rotator cuff disease

Examination

  • Look: Swelling, ecchymosis (tracks to chest/arm), deformity
  • Feel: Crepitus, localized tenderness
  • Move: Severely limited by pain
  • Neurovascular: Axillary nerve, brachial plexus, pulses

Mandatory Neurovascular Exam

Axillary nerve assessment is mandatory: Test deltoid contraction (arm abduction against resistance) and sensation over regimental badge area (lateral arm). Document before and after any manipulation or surgery.

Neurovascular Testing

StructureHow to TestPositive FindingInjury Rate
Axillary nerveDeltoid contraction, regimental badge sensationWeak abduction, numbness lateral arm5-10% in fractures, higher with dislocation
Brachial plexusMotor and sensory exam all distributionsVariable deficits multiple nervesRare in isolated fractures
Axillary arteryRadial pulse, capillary refill, DopplerAbsent pulse, cool pale handRare - fracture-dislocation risk
Musculocutaneous nerveElbow flexion (biceps), lateral forearm sensationWeak flexion, numbnessRare

Associated Injuries

In high-energy trauma, assess for ipsilateral clavicle fracture (floating shoulder), scapula fracture, rib fractures, and pulmonary injury. In elderly low-energy falls, consider other fragility fractures and need for bone health assessment.

Investigations

Imaging Protocol

First LinePlain Radiographs - Trauma Series

Three views essential: True AP (Grashey), Scapular Y (Lateral), Axillary. These form the trauma series and allow assessment of all four parts and dislocation status.

If Axillary LimitedVelpeau View

Modified axillary view taken with patient leaning back over cassette - avoids need to abduct arm. Useful in acute trauma with limited mobility.

Surgical PlanningCT Scan

Recommended for all operative cases. 3D reconstructions help understand fracture pattern, articular involvement, head viability. Essential for 3-part and 4-part fractures.

OptionalMRI

Rarely indicated acutely. May help assess rotator cuff in subacute phase or evaluate blood supply to head (contrast enhancement).

Radiographic Views

ViewTechniqueWhat It ShowsKey Assessment
True AP (Grashey)40° oblique to cassetteGlenohumeral joint spaceHead location, displacement, dislocation
Scapular Y90° to GrasheyLateral view of scapulaAP displacement, dislocation direction
AxillaryBeam through axillaGlenoid and head relationshipDislocation, GT/LT displacement
VelpeauPatient leaning backModified axillaryWhen axillary not possible

CT Scan Indications

Always get CT for: 3-part and 4-part fractures, head-split patterns, fracture-dislocations, pre-operative planning. CT with 3D reconstruction is superior for understanding complex patterns and identifying head viability in valgus-impacted fractures.

4-panel series showing proximal humerus fracture with 3D CT and hemiarthroplasty outcome
Click to expand
Complex proximal humerus fracture management: (a) Pre-operative AP radiograph showing displaced 4-part fracture pattern. (b) 3D CT reconstruction demonstrating the fracture configuration with tuberosity displacement - essential for surgical planning. (c-d) Post-operative AP and axillary views showing hemiarthroplasty with well-positioned prosthesis and healed tuberosity attachments. This represents the treatment pathway for unreconstructable 4-part fractures in active elderly patients.Credit: Open-i/PMC - CC BY 4.0
Pre-operative AP and lateral radiographs of displaced proximal humerus fracture
Click to expand
Pre-operative trauma series demonstrating displaced proximal humerus fracture: (a) AP view showing fracture through the surgical neck with varus angulation of the humeral head. (b) Lateral (scapular Y) view confirming the displacement pattern. These two orthogonal views are essential components of the trauma series, though the axillary view would complete the assessment for surgical planning.Credit: Open-i/PMC - CC BY 4.0

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
proximal humerus fractures management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for proximal humerus fracturesCredit: OrthoVellum

Non-Operative Management

Indications:

  • 1-part (minimally displaced) fractures - 85% of all cases
  • Elderly low-demand patients with displaced fractures (PROFHER evidence)
  • Significant medical comorbidities precluding surgery
  • Head-split or severely comminuted fractures in non-surgical candidates

Non-Operative Protocol

ImmobilizationWeek 0-2

Collar and cuff or sling. Pendulum exercises begin immediately. Elbow, wrist, hand ROM.

Protected MotionWeek 2-6

Begin passive and active-assisted shoulder ROM. Supine exercises initially. X-ray at 2 weeks.

Active ROMWeek 6-12

Progress to active ROM and strengthening. Most fractures clinically healed by 6-8 weeks.

Rehabilitation3-6 months

Full strengthening program. Return to activities as tolerated. Some stiffness may persist.

PROFHER Impact

The PROFHER trial showed no difference in functional outcomes between surgical and non-surgical treatment for displaced proximal humerus fractures at 2 years. This has shifted practice toward more conservative management, especially in elderly patients.

Indications for Surgery

IndicationRationalePreferred Treatment
2-part surgical neck, younggreater than 1cm displacement, functional demandORIF plate or IMN
2-part GT greater than 5mm displacementAffects rotator cuff functionORIF screws or suture fixation
3-part, young/activeFunctional demand, acceptable boneORIF plate
Valgus-impacted 4-partBlood supply may be preservedORIF if medial hinge intact
Displaced 3-part, elderlyPoor bone, high AVN riskRSA or hemiarthroplasty
4-part, elderlyHead non-viableReverse shoulder arthroplasty
Head-split fractureHead not salvageableRSA
Fracture-dislocationJoint congruity neededUrgent reduction then definitive

Age Considerations

Age 65-70 is often the threshold between ORIF and arthroplasty. However, physiological age, activity level, bone quality, and fracture pattern are more important than chronological age. RSA has largely replaced hemiarthroplasty due to better functional outcomes.

Surgical Technique

ORIF with Locking Plate - Comprehensive Technique:

Consent Points

  • Infection: 1-2% superficial, 0.5% deep
  • Axillary nerve injury: 5-10% (document preop status)
  • AVN: 3-14% (3-part), 15-35% (4-part)
  • Screw penetration: 14% - may need removal
  • Hardware failure/reoperation: 10-15%
  • Stiffness: Very common - physio critical

Equipment Checklist

  • Proximal humerus locking plate (system of choice)
  • Locking and cortical screws - multiple lengths
  • K-wires: 1.6mm and 2.0mm for temporary fixation
  • Heavy sutures: No. 2 or 5 FiberWire/Ethibond
  • Bone hook and elevator for reduction
  • C-arm positioned from contralateral side

Patient Positioning:

Setup Checklist

Step 1Beach Chair Position

30-45° trunk elevation. Head secured in padded headrest. Body shifted toward operative edge of table. Arm freely draped on arm board or mayo stand.

Step 2Brachial Plexus Protection

Avoid excessive lateral neck flexion - stretches plexus. Head in neutral rotation, supported centrally.

Step 3C-arm Access

C-arm enters from contralateral side. Confirm AP, axillary, and Velpeau views achievable. Test imaging BEFORE draping.

Step 4Prep and Drape

Prep from nipple to neck, axilla to midline posteriorly. Free drape arm to allow full manipulation.

Positioning Pearl

Blood pressure can drop significantly in beach chair position (cerebral hypoperfusion). Keep MAP above 70mmHg, and avoid sudden position changes.

Deltopectoral Approach:

Step-by-Step Approach

Step 1Skin Incision

Landmarks: Coracoid process proximally, deltoid insertion distally. Length: 12-15cm incision from coracoid along deltopectoral groove.

Step 2Identify Cephalic Vein

The cephalic vein runs in the deltopectoral groove. Take the vein laterally with deltoid - protects vein and is more anatomical.

Step 3Develop Interval

Split between deltoid (lateral) and pectoralis major (medial). Do not cross more than 4cm distal to acromion (axillary nerve).

Step 4Identify Fracture

Biceps tendon is key landmark between tuberosities. Place stay sutures in rotator cuff for manipulation.

Step 5Expose Fragments

Retract deltoid laterally. Identify all fragments systematically. Tag rotator cuff tendons with heavy sutures.

Reduction and Fixation Steps:

Fixation Steps

Step 1Reduce Head to Shaft

Use bone hook in medullary canal of shaft, lever reduction to head. Provisional K-wire from lateral cortex into head.

Step 2Reduce Tuberosities

Use sutures through rotator cuff to manipulate tuberosities. GT should sit 5-8mm below articular surface. Temporary K-wire fixation.

Step 3Apply Locking Plate

Position 5-8mm below GT tip. Calcar screw first - supports medial column. Centered on lateral humerus.

Step 4Insert Screws

Subchondral screw placement (3-5mm from articular surface). Minimum 5 locking screws in head. Check with AP, axillary, and Velpeau views.

Step 5Tuberosity Augmentation

Pass heavy sutures through rotator cuff tendons. Tie around plate or through plate holes. Creates tension-band effect.

Do's

  • Calcar screw first - prevents varus collapse
  • 5-8mm below GT - plate position critical
  • Subchondral screws for best purchase
  • Check ALL fluoroscopy views
  • Tag all tendons early

Don'ts

  • Don't plate too high - causes impingement
  • Don't place screws too long - articular penetration
  • Don't ignore medial column
  • Don't forget tuberosity sutures
  • Don't accept varus reduction

Intraoperative Troubleshooting:

ProblemLikely CauseSolution
Can't reduce head to shaftSoft tissue interpositionOpen release, clear haematoma, release capsule
Varus collapse after fixationInadequate medial supportAdd calcar screw, consider allograft strut
Screw penetrationScrews too longMeasure carefully, replace with shorter screw
GT won't reduceRetracted by supraspinatusRelease superior capsule, mobilize with sutures
Poor bone qualityOsteoporosisUse locking screws, augment with cement, consider arthroplasty

When to Abort to Arthroplasty

If intraoperative findings reveal severe osteoporosis precluding fixation, head fragmentation during reduction, or extensive articular damage, be prepared to convert to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Always consent patients for this possibility.

Arthroplasty Options

RSA is Now Preferred

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has largely replaced hemiarthroplasty for fractures. RSA provides reliable pain relief and function regardless of tuberosity healing, while hemiarthroplasty outcomes depend heavily on tuberosity healing.

Arthroplasty Comparison

OptionIndicationsProsCons
HemiarthroplastyYoung patient, good rotator cuff, good bonePreserves native glenoid, revision possibleOutcomes depend on tuberosity healing, unpredictable
Reverse SA (RSA)Elderly, rotator cuff deficient, 4-part fracturesReliable outcomes, less dependent on tuberositiesGlenoid revision difficult, scapular notching
Total shoulderFracture with pre-existing OA (rare)Address arthritis simultaneouslyComplex surgery, rarely indicated acutely

Tuberosity Reconstruction

In both hemiarthroplasty and RSA, tuberosity reconstruction is critical. Tuberosities should be fixed around the prosthesis using heavy non-absorbable sutures in a tension-band configuration. Tuberosity malunion or non-union is the most common cause of poor outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty for fracture.

2-panel comparison of comminuted proximal humerus fracture treated with hemiarthroplasty
Click to expand
2-panel (A-B) comparison: (A) Post-operative AP radiograph showing hemiarthroplasty with prosthetic humeral head in situ - note cemented stem and prosthetic head replacing fractured segments. (B) Pre-operative radiograph demonstrating severely comminuted 4-part proximal humerus fracture pattern that required arthroplasty. Hemiarthroplasty outcomes depend heavily on tuberosity healing and reattachment.Credit: Open-i / NIH - PMC3800381 (CC-BY 4.0)
2-panel comparison of comminuted proximal humerus fracture treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Click to expand
2-panel (A-B) comparison: (A) Pre-operative radiograph showing severely comminuted proximal humerus fracture with head-split pattern - note multiple fragments and humeral head involvement. (B) Post-operative radiograph demonstrating reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with characteristic reversed ball-on-socket configuration (ball on glenoid, cup on humerus). RSA provides predictable outcomes regardless of tuberosity healing by relying on deltoid function rather than rotator cuff.Credit: Open-i / NIH - PMC4004637 (CC-BY 4.0)

Complications

Complications and Management

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
AVN15-35% (4-part)Displacement, head vascularityClose monitoring, arthroplasty if symptomatic
MalunionMost commonNon-op treatment, inadequate reductionOsteotomy if symptomatic, prevention key
Nonunion5-10%Surgical neck fx, osteoporosis, smokingBone graft and fixation or arthroplasty
StiffnessCommonProlonged immobilization, adhesive capsulitisPrevention with early ROM, may need MUA or release
Axillary nerve injury5-10%Dislocation, surgical approachMost recover - observe 3-6 months
Subacromial impingementVariablePlate or GT malpositionHardware removal, tuberosity osteotomy
Screw penetrationVariableTechnical errorRemove offending screws

AVN Risk Factors

AVN risk correlates with head ischemia: anatomic neck fractures (highest risk), head-split fractures, 4-part fractures (15-35%), 3-part fractures (3-14%). Valgus-impacted patterns have lower risk due to preserved medial soft tissue hinge.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

ORIF Rehabilitation Protocol

ProtectionWeek 0-2

Sling immobilization. Elbow, wrist, hand ROM. Pendulum exercises.

Passive ROMWeek 2-6

Begin passive and active-assisted ROM. Forward flexion in supine, ER to neutral.

Active ROMWeek 6-12

Active ROM in all planes. X-ray confirmation of healing. Discontinue sling.

Strengthening12+ weeks

Progressive rotator cuff and deltoid strengthening. Return to activities 3-6 months.

RSA Rehabilitation Protocol

ProtectionWeek 0-2

Sling with abduction pillow if used. Elbow, wrist, hand exercises. Pendulums.

Early MotionWeek 2-6

Passive forward flexion. Active-assisted exercises as tuberosity healing progresses.

Active ROMWeek 6-12

Progress to active ROM. Focus on deltoid activation for RSA.

Strengthening3-6 months

Gradual strengthening. RSA allows earlier active motion than hemiarthroplasty.

RSA Advantage

With RSA, deltoid becomes the primary elevator rather than rotator cuff. This allows earlier active motion and more predictable outcomes compared to hemiarthroplasty where tuberosity healing determines function.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Expected Outcomes by Treatment

TreatmentShoulder FunctionComplicationsNotes
Non-operative (1-part)Good to excellentMinimal85% of fractures, reliable outcomes
Non-operative (displaced)ModerateStiffness, malunionPROFHER supports in elderly
ORIFVariableHardware issues, AVNBest in young with good bone
HemiarthroplastyUnpredictableTuberosity dependentFalling out of favor
RSAReliableScapular notchingCurrent gold standard for 4-part elderly

Prognostic Factors

Key factors affecting outcome: Age (older = more stiffness), Initial displacement (correlates with soft tissue injury), Bone quality, Patient activity level, and Tuberosity healing (for arthroplasty). Function at 1-2 years is best predictor of long-term outcome.

Evidence Base

PROFHER Trial

I
📚 Handoll et al.
Key Findings:
  • RCT of 250 patients: No significant difference in functional outcomes (Oxford Shoulder Score) at 2 years between surgical and non-surgical treatment for displaced proximal humerus fractures. Cost-effectiveness favored non-operative treatment.
Clinical Implication: Landmark trial that shifted practice toward non-operative management in older patients. Surgery shows no benefit over conservative treatment.
Source: JAMA 2015;313(10):1037-1047

RSA vs Hemiarthroplasty

II
📚 Ferrel et al. (Systematic Review)
Key Findings:
  • RSA provides better active forward flexion (130° vs 100°) and lower revision rates (3% vs 10%) compared to hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures. Tuberosity healing less critical for function with RSA.
Clinical Implication: RSA is now preferred over hemiarthroplasty for elderly patients with displaced 3-part and 4-part fractures.
Source: JBJS Am. 2020;102(12):1068-1077

Neer Classification Reliability

III
📚 Sidor et al.
Key Findings:
  • Inter-observer reliability of Neer classification is only moderate (kappa 0.5-0.6). Adding CT improves reliability but still imperfect.
Clinical Implication: Classification should guide but not dictate treatment. Consider the whole patient, not just the radiographic pattern.
Source: JBJS Am. 1993;75(12):1745-1750

Locking Plate Complications

IV
📚 Sudkamp et al.
Key Findings:
  • Prospective multicenter study of 187 patients. 34% complication rate: screw perforation (14%), AVN (8%), impingement (6%). Calcar screw use reduced complications.
Clinical Implication: Technical factors critical: plate position 5-8mm below GT, calcar screw improves stability, check fluoroscopy for screw penetration.
Source: JBJS Am. 2009;91(6):1320-1328

Australian Registry Data

III
📚 AOANJRR
Key Findings:
  • Shoulder arthroplasty for fracture: RSA has lower revision rates than hemiarthroplasty at all time points. 5-year revision rate RSA 4.2% vs hemiarthroplasty 7.8%.
Clinical Implication: Australian data supports RSA as preferred arthroplasty option for shoulder fractures.
Source: Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry 2023

Viva Scenarios

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Elderly Low-Energy Fall

EXAMINER

"A 75-year-old woman presents after a fall at home. She has pain and inability to move her left shoulder. X-rays show a displaced 4-part proximal humerus fracture with the head in valgus position. She is otherwise healthy and independent with ADLs."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Thank you. This is a **4-part proximal humerus fracture** in an elderly patient - a common and important scenario. **Assessment:** I would take a focused history including mechanism, hand dominance, functional demands, and medical comorbidities. Examination must include **axillary nerve testing** (regimental badge sensation, deltoid function) as injury is common with proximal humerus fractures. **Radiographic Interpretation:** This is a Neer 4-part fracture with **valgus impaction** - an important distinction. The valgus-impacted pattern typically preserves the medial periosteal hinge and blood supply through the posterior circumflex humeral artery, giving a lower AVN risk than other 4-part patterns. **Treatment Discussion:** The **PROFHER trial** showed no significant difference between operative and non-operative treatment for proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients at 2 years. However, this was a heterogeneous population. For this **75-year-old healthy, active, independent patient**, I would discuss two main options: 1. **Non-operative treatment** - sling, early pendular exercises, physiotherapy. Acceptable outcomes in many elderly patients. 2. **Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA)** - my preference for active elderly with displaced 4-part fractures. RSA provides reliable pain relief and function independent of rotator cuff healing or tuberosity union. I would **not recommend hemiarthroplasty** as RSA has shown superior functional outcomes in this population, particularly for fracture patterns.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Systematic assessment: history, examination, neurovascular status
Interpret X-rays - identify 4-part pattern with valgus impaction
Discuss that valgus-impacted pattern may preserve blood supply
Treatment options: non-operative (PROFHER) vs RSA (current preference for active elderly)
If surgery - RSA preferred over hemiarthroplasty due to reliable outcomes
COMMON TRAPS
✗Failing to assess axillary nerve preoperatively
✗Recommending hemiarthroplasty - RSA preferred now
✗Not considering non-operative based on PROFHER evidence
✗Missing that valgus impaction may allow ORIF consideration
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if she had a head-split component?"
"How would you manage if she had severe osteoporosis?"
"What is your post-operative protocol after RSA?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Young Active Patient

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old competitive recreational tennis player falls during a match. He has a displaced 3-part fracture (greater tuberosity and surgical neck displaced) with moderate osteopenia. He is very keen to return to sport."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Thank you. This is a **displaced 3-part proximal humerus fracture** in a young, active patient with high functional demands. **Key Considerations:** At 45 years old with sporting aspirations, this patient requires **head-preserving surgery**. ORIF is my preferred treatment - arthroplasty would be a last resort in this age group. **Preoperative Planning:** I would obtain a **CT scan** to fully characterize the fracture pattern, assess bone quality, and plan my approach. The described pattern involves the greater tuberosity and surgical neck with moderate osteopenia. **Surgical Technique:** I would use a **deltopectoral approach** for optimal exposure and control: - Position beach chair with arm table - Identify and protect cephalic vein laterally - Identify biceps tendon as landmark for tuberosities - Reduce the shaft to the head first, addressing any medial comminution - **Calcar screw** is essential - placed inferomedially to support the medial column - **Locking plate** positioned below the greater tuberosity tip (5-8mm) to avoid impingement - **Heavy non-absorbable sutures** through the rotator cuff/tuberosity attached to the plate for tuberosity reduction and supplementary fixation **Technical Pearls:** - Tuberosity reduction is critical for rotator cuff function and return to sport - Multiple locking screws into the head fragment in divergent pattern - Avoid varus malreduction - maintain or slightly valgus reduce I would counsel him that return to competitive tennis is possible but typically takes 6-12 months with dedicated rehabilitation.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Young active patient - higher functional demands
3-part fracture - ORIF is appropriate if fixation achievable
Deltopectoral approach, locking plate fixation
Tuberosity repair with sutures critical for rotator cuff function
Discuss calcar screw and adequate locking screws into head
COMMON TRAPS
✗Jumping straight to arthroplasty in a 45-year-old
✗Underappreciating the importance of tuberosity reduction
✗Plate too high causing impingement
✗Not getting CT for surgical planning
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if fixation failed at 6 weeks?"
"How would you counsel him about return to tennis?"
"What is your approach if he develops AVN at 1 year?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Fracture-Dislocation

EXAMINER

"A 60-year-old presents after high-speed MVA. On examination, the shoulder is squared-off with absent axillary nerve function. X-rays show a 3-part fracture-dislocation with the head posteriorly dislocated. CT confirms significant glenoid bone loss from a Hill-Sachs reverse lesion."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Thank you. This is a **high-energy fracture-dislocation** requiring urgent management. Let me address this systematically. **Immediate Priorities:** First, this is an **MVA patient** - I would follow **ATLS principles** and ensure the full primary and secondary survey is complete. Other injuries must be excluded before focusing on the shoulder. **Documentation:** The **axillary nerve deficit must be clearly documented** before any intervention. I would record motor function (deltoid, teres minor) and sensation (regimental badge area). This is critical medico-legally and for prognostication. **Urgent Reduction:** A **posterior fracture-dislocation is an emergency**. There is risk of neurovascular compromise and pressure necrosis of the humeral head. I would proceed to urgent closed reduction under sedation or general anesthesia with muscle relaxation. The dislocated head puts the axillary vessels at risk. **Post-Reduction CT:** After successful reduction, a **CT scan is essential** for surgical planning. This will delineate: - Exact fracture pattern - Glenoid bone loss (you mention significant loss with reverse Hill-Sachs) - Head viability assessment **Definitive Management:** For a 60-year-old with a 3-part fracture-dislocation and significant glenoid bone loss, my preference would be **reverse shoulder arthroplasty**. The glenoid bone loss may require bone grafting or a larger glenoid baseplate depending on defect location and size. **Axillary Nerve:** Axillary nerve injury in this setting is typically a **neurapraxia or axonotmesis** from traction. Most recover by 6 months. I would counsel the patient about prognosis and arrange EMG at 6 weeks if no clinical recovery.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Emergency assessment - this is high-energy trauma, ATLS principles
Document axillary nerve deficit before any intervention
Urgent closed reduction under sedation or GA - vascular compromise risk
CT after reduction for definitive planning
Definitive treatment depends on fracture pattern and glenoid bone loss
COMMON TRAPS
✗Forgetting to document neurovascular status before reduction
✗Delaying reduction - vascular compromise with posterior dislocation
✗Not getting full trauma workup before focusing on shoulder
✗Failing to consider glenoid bone loss in surgical planning
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if closed reduction fails?"
"How do you address the glenoid bone loss?"
"What is prognosis for axillary nerve recovery?"

MCQ Practice Points

Blood Supply Question

Q: What is the main blood supply to the humeral head? A: The arcuate artery (ascending branch of the anterior circumflex humeral artery) provides 80% of blood supply. It enters at the intertubercular groove and is at risk in displaced fractures.

Classification Question

Q: In Neer classification, what defines a 'displaced part'? A: greater than 1cm translation or over 45° angulation. Count displaced parts (not fracture lines) - there are 4 anatomical parts: head, greater tuberosity, lesser tuberosity, and shaft.

AVN Risk Question

Q: What is the AVN rate in 4-part proximal humerus fractures? A: 15-35% for 4-part fractures, 3-14% for 3-part fractures. Valgus-impacted 4-part fractures have lower AVN risk due to preserved medial hinge.

PROFHER Trial Question

Q: What did the PROFHER trial demonstrate? A: No significant difference in functional outcomes (Oxford Shoulder Score) at 2 years between surgical and non-operative treatment for displaced proximal humerus fractures. Cost-effectiveness favored non-operative treatment.

Nerve at Risk Question

Q: Which nerve is most commonly injured in proximal humerus fractures? A: Axillary nerve (5-10% incidence). It wraps around the surgical neck 5-7cm below the acromion. Test deltoid contraction and regimental badge sensation.

Arthroplasty Question

Q: For a 75-year-old with a displaced 4-part fracture, what is the preferred arthroplasty option? A: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). RSA provides more reliable outcomes than hemiarthroplasty because function is less dependent on tuberosity healing.

Australian Context

AOANJRR Data

  • Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry
  • RSA revision rates lower than hemiarthroplasty for fracture
  • Valuable resource for discussing outcomes with patients
  • Shoulder arthroplasty data increasingly comprehensive

PBS and Medications

  • Bone health assessment for fragility fractures
  • PBS-listed bisphosphonates and denosumab
  • Vitamin D and calcium supplementation
  • Orthogeriatric model for hip fractures extending to shoulder

Fragility Fracture Assessment

Any proximal humerus fracture from a low-energy mechanism in a patient over 50 should trigger bone health assessment. This includes DEXA scan, vitamin D levels, and consideration of anti-resorptive therapy. Follow Australian guidelines for secondary fracture prevention.

PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURES

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Anatomy

  • •4 parts: Head, Greater tuberosity, Lesser tuberosity, Shaft
  • •Arcuate artery (from anterior circumflex) = main blood supply
  • •Axillary nerve 5-7cm below acromion - test deltoid and sensation
  • •Pectoralis major displaces shaft medially

Neer Classification

  • •Count DISPLACED parts (greater than 1cm or over 45°)
  • •1-part = non-displaced = 85% of fractures = non-op
  • •2-part = one displaced segment = consider ORIF if young/active
  • •3-part = two displaced = ORIF vs arthroplasty
  • •4-part = all separated = RSA in elderly

Treatment Algorithm

  • •1-part: Sling and early ROM - excellent outcomes
  • •2-part GT greater than 5mm: ORIF in active patients
  • •2-part surgical neck: ORIF if young, consider non-op if elderly
  • •3-part: ORIF if good bone and young, RSA if elderly
  • •4-part: RSA preferred over hemiarthroplasty in elderly

Surgical Pearls

  • •Deltopectoral approach - cephalic vein laterally
  • •Plate 5-8mm below GT tip to avoid impingement
  • •Calcar screw improves stability
  • •Check screw penetration with fluoroscopy AP, axillary, Velpeau views
  • •Tuberosity repair with heavy sutures critical for function

Complications

  • •AVN: 15-35% in 4-part, 3-14% in 3-part
  • •Malunion: Most common complication overall
  • •Stiffness: Early ROM prevents adhesive capsulitis
  • •Axillary nerve injury: Document before surgery, most recover
Quick Stats
Reading Time119 min
Related Topics

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures