Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Scaphoid Nonunion

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Scaphoid Nonunion

Comprehensive guide to scaphoid nonunion - humpback deformity, SNAC wrist progression, vascularized bone graft, Herbert classification for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2024-12-16
High Yield Overview

SCAPHOID NONUNION - HUMPBACK DEFORMITY and SNAC WRIST

Retrograde Blood Supply | AVN Risk | Vascularized Bone Graft | SNAC Progression

5-15%Nonunion rate of scaphoid fractures
100%Progress to SNAC if untreated
45 degHumpback angle threshold
1,2 ICSRAGold standard VBG for AVN

HERBERT D CLASSIFICATION (NONUNION)

D1
PatternFibrous union - viable
TreatmentORIF, may not need graft
D2
PatternPseudarthrosis - mobile
TreatmentORIF + bone graft
D3
PatternSclerotic nonunion
TreatmentDebride + extensive graft
D4
PatternAVN of proximal pole
TreatmentVascularized bone graft

Critical Must-Knows

  • Retrograde blood supply - proximal pole at highest AVN risk (80% from dorsal scaphoid branch)
  • Humpback deformity - flexion through nonunion site creates dorsal angulation
  • DISI pattern develops - lunate extends as scaphoid flexes (carpal collapse)
  • 100% progress to SNAC wrist if untreated - arthritis is inevitable
  • VBG (1,2 ICSRA) indicated for AVN or failed previous fixation

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Lateral intrascaphoid angle greater than 45 degrees = significant humpback requiring wedge graft
  • "
    MRI with gadolinium assesses AVN - lack of enhancement means AVN, requires VBG
  • "
    Non-vascularized graft if viable proximal pole, VBG if AVN or failed surgery
  • "
    Union rates: 90-95% non-VBG viable bone, 80-90% VBG for AVN

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Fracture line evident through the scaphoid.
Click to expand
Fracture line evident through the scaphoid.Credit: Pape JP et al. via MedPix via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Fracture line evident through the scaphoid.
Click to expand
Fracture line evident through the scaphoid.Credit: Pape JP et al. via MedPix via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Scaphoid Nonunion Exam Points

Humpback Deformity

Nonunion allows flexion through fracture site creating dorsal angulation (convex dorsally like a humpback). Lateral intrascaphoid angle greater than 45 degrees is significant. Must correct with wedge graft for union.

AVN Assessment

MRI with gadolinium is gold standard - lack of proximal pole enhancement indicates AVN. Intraoperative punctate bleeding confirms vascularity. AVN requires vascularized bone graft.

1,2 ICSRA Graft

1,2 Intercompartmental Supraretinacular Artery pedicled graft from dorsal distal radius. Gold standard for AVN nonunion. Described by Zaidemberg 1991.

SNAC Wrist Progression

Untreated nonunion = 100% SNAC wrist. Arthritis progresses: Stage 1 radial styloid, Stage 2 scaphocapitate, Stage 3 capitolunate, Stage 4 pancarpal.

Quick Decision Guide - Scaphoid Nonunion

PresentationAssessmentTreatmentGraft Type
Fibrous union (D1)Minimal motion at nonunionORIF alone may sufficeCancellous graft if needed
Pseudarthrosis (D2)Mobile nonunion, viable boneORIF + bone graftIliac crest cancellous
Humpback, no AVNISA greater than 45 degrees, MRI signal intactCorrect deformity + fixCorticocancellous wedge
AVN proximal pole (D4)No MRI enhancement, no intraop bleedingVascularized bone graft1,2 ICSRA pedicled graft
Failed previous surgeryPrior nonunion repair failedRevision with VBGFree vascularized MFC graft
Mnemonic

RETROScaphoid Blood Supply

R
Radial artery
Main supply via dorsal scaphoid branch
E
Enters distally
Blood enters at dorsal ridge (waist level)
T
Travels proximally
Retrograde flow toward proximal pole
R
Risk to proximal
Proximal pole most vulnerable to AVN
O
Only 20%
Only 20-30% of proximal pole has direct supply

Memory Hook:Blood enters distally and runs RETRO (backwards) up the scaphoid - proximal pole is at highest risk!

Mnemonic

SNAPSNonunion Risk Factors

S
Smoking
Major modifiable risk factor for nonunion
N
NSAID use
Anti-inflammatories inhibit bone healing
A
AVN
Avascular necrosis prevents healing
P
Proximal pole
Poor blood supply location
S
Significant displacement
Displacement greater than 1mm increases nonunion

Memory Hook:SNAPS cause nonunion - especially Smoking and proximal pole location!

Mnemonic

VIABLESGraft Selection Algorithm

V
Vascularity
Check MRI/intraop bleeding - viable or AVN?
I
Intrascaphoid angle
Measure humpback - greater than 45 degrees needs wedge
A
Articulations check
Any arthritic changes (SNAC)?
B
Bone quality
Sclerosis, cystic changes?
L
Length of nonunion
Chronic more challenging
E
Earlier surgery?
Failed previous fixation = VBG
S
Select graft
Non-VBG vs VBG based on assessment

Memory Hook:Is the bone VIABLE? Use this checklist to decide if patient needs VBG or non-vascularized graft!

Mnemonic

RSC-PSNAC Wrist Stages

R
Radial styloid
Stage 1 - Radial styloid to scaphoid arthritis
S
Scaphocapitate
Stage 2 - Scaphoid to capitate arthritis added
C
Capitolunate
Stage 3 - Capitate to lunate arthritis added
P
Pancarpal
Stage 4 - Entire wrist arthritis

Memory Hook:SNAC progresses RSC-P: Radial styloid first, then Scaphocapitate, Capitolunate, finally Pancarpal!

Overview and Epidemiology

Definition: Scaphoid nonunion is failure of a scaphoid fracture to heal, typically defined as absence of radiographic union at 6 months despite treatment, or presence of an established nonunion pattern.

Incidence and Risk Factors:

  • 5-15% of all scaphoid fractures progress to nonunion
  • Higher rates in:
    • Proximal pole fractures (up to 30%)
    • Displaced fractures (greater than 1mm)
    • Delayed presentation (greater than 4 weeks)
    • Missed diagnosis
    • Smokers (2-3x increased risk)

Risk Factors

  • Proximal pole location - poor blood supply
  • Displacement greater than 1mm
  • Delayed treatment greater than 4 weeks
  • Smoking - major modifiable factor
  • NSAID use - inhibits healing
  • Initial AVN
  • Poor immobilization compliance

Natural History

  • 100% progress to SNAC wrist if untreated
  • Mean time to symptomatic SNAC: 5-10 years
  • Even asymptomatic nonunions deteriorate
  • Mack et al: 97% radioscaphoid arthritis within 10 years
  • Young patients especially vulnerable

Exam Pearl

Key exam point: Unlike other nonunions where the question is "will it cause problems?", scaphoid nonunion has a 100% certainty of progression to SNAC wrist arthritis. Treatment is almost always indicated.

Anatomy and Blood Supply

Scaphoid Anatomy:

  • Largest carpal bone in proximal row
  • Spans both carpal rows (proximal and distal)
  • 80% covered by articular cartilage - limits periosteal blood supply
  • Acts as kinematic link between carpal rows

Blood Supply (Critical for Exam):

Scaphoid Blood Supply

VesselContributionEntry PointArea Supplied
Dorsal scaphoid branch (radial artery)70-80%Dorsal ridge at waistMajority of bone via retrograde flow
Palmar branches (superficial palmar arch)20-30%Scaphoid tubercleDistal pole and tuberosity
Direct proximal supplyVariable (20%)VariableSmall portion proximal pole

Clinical Implications:

  • Retrograde flow = proximal pole at highest AVN risk
  • Waist fractures interrupt main blood supply to proximal pole
  • Proximal pole fractures have highest nonunion rate (up to 30%)
  • Only 20-30% of proximal pole has any direct blood supply

Proximal Pole Fractures

Proximal pole fractures have the highest nonunion and AVN rates (up to 30%) because they completely disrupt the retrograde blood supply from the main dorsal scaphoid branch. Always consider these high-risk injuries.

Pathophysiology of Nonunion

Humpback Deformity:

The scaphoid normally acts as a strut connecting the proximal and distal carpal rows. When nonunion develops:

  1. Loss of structural integrity at nonunion site
  2. Flexion force from scaphotrapezial ligament pulls distal fragment into flexion
  3. Dorsal angulation develops at nonunion site
  4. Dorsal convexity creates "humpback" appearance

Measuring Humpback:

  • Lateral intrascaphoid angle measured on lateral radiograph or sagittal CT
  • Lines drawn along proximal and distal pole axes
  • Normal: less than 35 degrees
  • Significant humpback: greater than 45 degrees
  • Must correct with wedge graft for successful union

DISI Pattern Development:

Normal Carpal Mechanics

  • Scaphoid links proximal and distal rows
  • Flexion tendency balanced by lunate
  • Lunate in neutral position
  • Normal scapholunate angle: 30-60 degrees

DISI in Nonunion

  • Scaphoid collapses into flexion
  • Lunate (attached to proximal fragment) extends
  • Dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI)
  • Scapholunate angle increases (greater than 60 degrees)
  • Leads to abnormal load distribution

Carpal Collapse Cascade

DISI pattern from scaphoid nonunion leads to abnormal carpal mechanics, altered load distribution, and ultimately SNAC wrist (Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse). This is the inevitable endpoint without treatment.

Classification Systems

Herbert Nonunion Classification (Type D):

TypeDescriptionCharacteristicsTreatment
D1Fibrous unionMinimal motion, may heal with prolonged immobilizationORIF, may not need graft
D2PseudarthrosisEstablished nonunion, mobile but viableORIF + bone graft
D3ScleroticDense sclerosis at nonunion marginsDebride + extensive graft
D4Avascular necrosisNo proximal pole vascularityVascularized bone graft

Exam Pearl

Herbert D classification is the exam standard. D4 (AVN) is the critical type - requires vascularized bone graft. D1-D3 may be treated with non-vascularized graft if bone is viable.

Nonunion by Fracture Location:

LocationNonunion RateAVN RiskTreatment Implications
Proximal pole20-30%High (30%+)Often requires VBG
Waist10-15%ModerateStandard graft if viable
Distal poleless than 5%LowUsually non-VBG sufficient

SNAC Wrist Staging (if arthritis present):

StageArthritis LocationSalvage Options
Stage 1Radial styloid to scaphoidRadial styloidectomy + nonunion repair
Stage 2+ ScaphocapitateScaphoid excision + 4-corner fusion
Stage 3+ Capitolunate4-corner fusion or PRC
Stage 4Pancarpal (including radiolunate)Total wrist fusion or arthroplasty

Exam Pearl

Key distinction: Radiolunate joint is preserved until Stage 4 in SNAC (vs Stage 3 in SLAC). This allows salvage procedures in earlier stages.

Clinical Assessment

History:

  • Often delayed presentation with chronic wrist pain
  • May have history of wrist injury (sometimes remote, forgotten)
  • Pain with gripping, loading wrist
  • Weakness, reduced grip strength
  • Decreased range of motion

Physical Examination:

Inspection

  • Swelling often minimal in chronic cases
  • Dorsal wrist fullness may be present
  • Compare with contralateral side
  • Assess overall wrist posture

Palpation

  • Anatomical snuffbox tenderness
  • Scaphoid tubercle tenderness (volar)
  • Dorsal scaphoid tenderness
  • Check for crepitus

Provocative Tests:

  • Scaphoid shift test (Watson test): Painful clunk with radial deviation
  • Thumb compression: Pain with axial load through thumb
  • Grip strength: Compare to contralateral side

Range of Motion:

  • Decreased wrist flexion/extension
  • Decreased radial deviation
  • May have relatively preserved ulnar deviation

Exam Pearl

Many scaphoid nonunions are "forgotten fractures" - patients may not recall injury. Always have high index of suspicion for nonunion in chronic wrist pain with snuffbox tenderness.

Investigations

Plain Radiographs:

Radiographic Views for Scaphoid Nonunion

ViewAssessmentKey Findings
PA wristOverall alignment, DISISignet ring sign, widened SL interval
Lateral wristHumpback measurement, DISIIntrascaphoid angle, SL angle greater than 60 degrees
Scaphoid PA (ulnar deviation, tube angled)Nonunion site detailGap, sclerosis, cystic changes
45 degree pronation obliqueScaphoid lengthAdditional nonunion detail

X-ray Findings in Nonunion:

  • Gap at fracture site
  • Sclerotic margins
  • Cystic changes
  • Bone resorption
  • Humpback deformity on lateral
  • DISI pattern (scapholunate angle greater than 60 degrees)
  • SNAC changes if advanced

CT Scan:

  • Gold standard for assessing bony union/nonunion
  • Sagittal reconstructions for humpback measurement
  • Identifies cystic changes, sclerosis
  • Essential for surgical planning
  • Assesses arthritic changes (SNAC staging)

MRI:

  • Essential for AVN assessment - determines graft choice
  • T1 sequences show marrow signal
  • Gadolinium enhancement confirms vascularity
  • No proximal pole enhancement = AVN = VBG required

MRI with Gadolinium

MRI with gadolinium is mandatory before scaphoid nonunion surgery to assess proximal pole vascularity. Lack of enhancement indicates AVN and mandates vascularized bone graft. Non-vascularized graft in AVN has high failure rate.

Bone Scan:

  • Less commonly used now
  • Decreased uptake suggests AVN
  • Non-specific

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
scaphoid nonunion management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for scaphoid nonunionCredit: OrthoVellum

Management Decision Tree

Goals of Treatment:

  1. Achieve union - primary goal
  2. Restore anatomy - correct humpback, length
  3. Prevent SNAC progression - all nonunions lead to arthritis
  4. Maintain/restore function - motion, grip strength

Assessment Steps:

  1. History and examination - symptom duration, prior treatment
  2. Plain radiographs (4 views) - confirm nonunion
  3. CT scan - nonunion detail, bone quality
  4. MRI with gadolinium - AVN assessment (critical)
  5. Check for SNAC changes - determines if salvage needed

Classification:

  • Herbert D type (D1-D4)
  • Location (proximal/waist/distal)
  • SNAC stage if arthritis present
  • Degree of humpback (ISA measurement)

Complete assessment guides appropriate treatment selection.

Bone Graft Selection Algorithm

Graft Selection Based on Vascularity:

  • Viable bone (D1-D3): Non-vascularized graft
  • AVN (D4): Vascularized bone graft (1,2 ICSRA)
  • Failed surgery + AVN: Free vascularized (MFC)
  • SNAC present: Salvage procedure

Surgical Steps:

  1. Debride nonunion to bleeding bone
  2. Correct humpback deformity
  3. Insert appropriate graft
  4. Fix with headless compression screw
  5. Immobilize 8-12 weeks

Indications for Surgery:

  • Virtually all symptomatic scaphoid nonunions
  • Asymptomatic nonunions in young patients (prevent SNAC)
  • Progressive arthritis changes

Graft selection is the most critical decision in scaphoid nonunion surgery.

Special Considerations

Relative Contraindications:

  • SNAC Stage 3-4 (salvage procedures indicated instead)
  • Severe comorbidities precluding surgery
  • Patient preference after informed discussion

SNAC Wrist Management:

  • SNAC 1: Radial styloidectomy + graft
  • SNAC 2: Scaphoid excision + 4-corner fusion
  • SNAC 3-4: Proximal row carpectomy or total wrist fusion

AVN Assessment:

  • MRI with gadolinium: contrast enhancement = viable
  • Lack of enhancement suggests AVN
  • Always confirm intraoperatively (punctate bleeding)

Failed Prior Surgery:

  • Consider free vascularized graft (MFC)
  • May need staged procedures
  • Higher risk of poor outcome

Careful patient selection and realistic expectations are essential.

Bone Graft Selection

Indications:

  • Viable proximal pole (MRI enhancement, intraop bleeding)
  • Herbert D1, D2, D3 with vascularity
  • Primary nonunion surgery

Types:

Graft TypeSourceIndication
CancellousDistal radius, iliac crestMinimal deformity, fill defect
CorticocancellousIliac crestModerate defect, some stability
Wedge (Fisk-Fernandez)Iliac crestHumpback correction
Russe inlayIliac crestClassic corticocancellous inlay

Technique Principles:

  • Debride sclerotic bone to punctate bleeding
  • Size graft to correct deformity
  • Pack cancellous around cortical strut
  • Fix with headless compression screw

Union Rates: 85-95% with appropriate patient selection

Indications:

  • AVN of proximal pole (no MRI enhancement)
  • Failed non-vascularized graft
  • Prolonged nonunion (greater than 5 years)
  • Very proximal fractures

1,2 ICSRA Graft (Zaidemberg):

  • Gold standard for AVN nonunion
  • Based on 1,2 intercompartmental supraretinacular artery
  • Pedicled from dorsal distal radius
  • Provides vascularized bone to revascularize proximal pole

Technique:

  • Dorsal approach to distal radius
  • Identify artery between 1st and 2nd compartments
  • Raise bone flap with pedicle
  • Insert into nonunion site, maintaining pedicle
  • Fix with K-wires or headless screw

Union Rates: 80-90% for AVN nonunion

Exam Pearl

The 1,2 ICSRA runs between the 1st (APL, EPB) and 2nd (ECRL, ECRB) extensor compartments in the supraretinacular (above the retinaculum) plane.

Indications:

  • Failed pedicled VBG
  • Multiple previous surgeries
  • Large defects
  • Salvage situations

Medial Femoral Condyle (MFC) Graft:

  • Free vascularized graft
  • Based on descending genicular artery
  • Requires microsurgical anastomosis
  • Provides large volume of vascularized bone

Advantages:

  • Large graft volume available
  • Cortical and cancellous bone
  • Reliable blood supply

Disadvantages:

  • Requires microsurgical expertise
  • Donor site morbidity
  • Longer operative time

Union Rates: 70-85% in salvage situations

Surgical Technique

Modified Russe Volar Approach

Indications:

  • Waist nonunions
  • Humpback deformity requiring correction
  • Non-vascularized bone graft

Steps:

  1. Incision: Longitudinal over scaphoid tubercle, between FCR and radial artery. Protect palmar cutaneous branch of median nerve.

  2. Exposure: Incise joint capsule, identify nonunion site. Wrist flexion improves access.

  3. Debridement: Remove fibrous tissue, debride sclerotic bone margins. Continue until punctate bleeding seen. Preserve periosteum where possible.

  4. Graft Insertion: Size wedge graft to correct humpback. Insert graft into prepared slot. Pack cancellous around. Confirm correction on fluoroscopy.

  5. Fixation: Headless compression screw (Acutrak, Herbert). Guidewire placement checked fluoroscopically. Screw should cross nonunion and engage proximal pole.

The volar approach provides excellent access for waist nonunions and humpback correction.

Dorsal Approach with 1,2 ICSRA Vascularized Graft

Indications:

  • Proximal pole nonunions
  • AVN (Herbert D4)
  • Failed prior surgery with questionable vascularity

Steps:

  1. Incision: Longitudinal dorsal wrist incision centered over Lister's tubercle. Protect sensory branches of radial nerve.

  2. Identify 1,2 ICSRA: Open retinaculum between 1st and 2nd compartments. Identify artery in supraretinacular plane. Trace proximally to confirm pedicle length.

  3. Raise Graft: Mark graft size on dorsal distal radius. Use osteotome to raise corticocancellous flap. Maintain vascular pedicle throughout.

  4. Prepare Nonunion: Open dorsal capsule, debride nonunion to punctate bleeding (or confirm AVN). Create slot for graft insertion.

  5. Insert and Fix: Rotate graft into nonunion site. Avoid kinking or tension on pedicle. Fix with K-wires or small headless screw. Confirm position and pedicle viability.

Dorsal approach with VBG is the gold standard for proximal pole AVN.

Critical Technical Points

Approach Selection:

Surgical Approaches for Scaphoid Nonunion

ApproachAdvantagesDisadvantagesBest Used For
Volar (Russe)Direct view, less AVN riskLimited proximal accessWaist nonunions, humpback
DorsalExcellent proximal access, VBGRisk to blood supplyProximal pole, AVN
CombinedComplete accessMore dissectionComplex nonunions

Key Principles:

  • Always confirm vascularity intraoperatively
  • Punctate bleeding from bone = viable
  • No bleeding despite debridement = AVN (convert to VBG)
  • Correct humpback deformity with structural graft
  • Use appropriate fixation (headless screws preferred)

Intraoperative Vascularity

Be prepared to switch graft type based on intraoperative findings. Even with negative MRI, confirm vascularity intraoperatively.

Complications

Complications of Scaphoid Nonunion Surgery

ComplicationIncidencePreventionManagement
Persistent nonunion5-20%Appropriate graft selection, techniqueRevision with VBG if AVN
AVN progressionVariableVBG for at-risk casesFree vascularized graft
SNAC progressionIf nonunion persistsAchieve unionSalvage procedure
Stiffness10-20%Early motion when healedPhysiotherapy
Hardware issues5-10%Appropriate screw sizingHardware removal if symptomatic
Donor site morbidity5-10%Minimize graft sizeSymptomatic treatment
Infectionless than 2%Sterile technique, prophylaxisAntibiotics, debridement

Persistent Nonunion Management:

  • Identify cause (inadequate graft, AVN, poor fixation, smoking)
  • Address modifiable factors
  • Revision with vascularized graft if non-VBG failed
  • Consider free vascularized (MFC) if pedicled VBG failed
  • If SNAC advanced, salvage procedures

SNAC Wrist Salvage:

  • If arthritis too advanced for nonunion repair:
    • Stage 1-2: Scaphoid excision + 4-corner fusion
    • Stage 2-3: Proximal row carpectomy (if capitolunate preserved)
    • Stage 3-4: Total wrist fusion or arthroplasty

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation Protocol

Weeks 0-8Immobilization Phase
  • Thumb spica cast or splint
  • Immobilize wrist and thumb IP joint
  • Allow finger motion
  • Serial radiographs at 4, 6, 8 weeks
  • No loading, gripping
Weeks 8-12Protected Motion
  • CT scan at 8 weeks to assess union
  • If signs of healing, transition to removable splint
  • Gentle active ROM exercises
  • Continue night splinting
  • No resistance activities
Weeks 12-16Strengthening
  • Progressive strengthening if union confirmed
  • Grip exercises, putty
  • Proprioception work
  • Gradually increase resistance
16+ WeeksReturn to Activity
  • Return to manual work when pain-free, strong
  • Contact sports delayed until 6 months
  • Monitor for complications

CT Monitoring:

  • Serial CT scans best for union assessment
  • Bridging trabeculae indicate healing
  • Complete bridging = union
  • May take 12+ weeks for VBG cases

Union Rates by Graft Type:

Expected Union Rates

Graft TypeIndicationUnion RateTime to Union
Non-vascularized (viable)D1-D3, no AVN85-95%8-12 weeks
Wedge graft (viable)Humpback correction85-95%10-14 weeks
1,2 ICSRA (AVN)D4, AVN80-90%12-16 weeks
Free MFC (salvage)Failed VBG70-85%14-20 weeks

Outcomes and Prognosis

Factors Affecting Outcome:

  • Vascularity - AVN has lower union rates
  • Time from injury - chronic worse than acute
  • Deformity correction - humpback must be addressed
  • Graft choice - appropriate graft selection critical
  • Smoking cessation - major modifiable factor

Functional Outcomes:

  • Most patients achieve pain relief with union
  • Grip strength 70-85% of contralateral
  • Range of motion 70-85% of contralateral
  • Return to work/sport in 4-6 months if union achieved

Exam Pearl

Exam key: Prognosis is excellent if union achieved - most patients return to normal function. The key is selecting the right graft (VBG for AVN) and correcting deformity (wedge graft for humpback).

Evidence Base

1,2 ICSRA Vascularized Bone Graft

IV
Zaidemberg C, Siebert JW, Angrigiani C • J Hand Surg Am (1991)
Key Findings:
  • Anatomic study defining 1,2 ICSRA
  • 11/11 patients achieved union
  • Average union time 11 weeks
  • Pedicled graft avoids microsurgery
Clinical Implication: This pedicled graft became the gold standard for scaphoid nonunion with AVN, avoiding the need for microsurgical expertise while providing vascularized bone

Natural History of Scaphoid Nonunion

IV
Mack GR, Bosse MJ, Gelberman RH, Yu E • J Hand Surg Am (1984)
Key Findings:
  • 46 patients with untreated nonunions
  • Mean follow-up 11.2 years
  • 97% developed radioscaphoid arthritis
  • 100% had abnormal wrist mechanics
Clinical Implication: All scaphoid nonunions should be treated to prevent inevitable SNAC wrist arthritis - observation is not appropriate management

Humpback Deformity and Outcomes

IV
Amadio PC, Berquist TH, Smith DK et al • J Hand Surg Am (1989)
Key Findings:
  • Measured intrascaphoid angle on lateral views
  • Normal angle less than 35 degrees
  • Greater than 45 degrees required wedge graft
  • Failure to correct led to persistent nonunion
Clinical Implication: Humpback deformity must be assessed and corrected with wedge graft for successful union

Non-vascularized vs Vascularized Grafts

IV
Merrell GA, Wolfe SW, Slade JF • J Hand Surg Am (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Non-vascularized: 85-95% union in viable bone
  • Vascularized: 80-90% union in AVN
  • AVN with non-VBG had much lower success (less than 60%)
  • Appropriate patient selection is key
Clinical Implication: Graft selection should be based on vascularity status - VBG for AVN, non-VBG for viable bone

Medial Femoral Condyle Free Vascularized Graft

IV
Jones DB Jr, Burger H, Bishop AT, Shin AY • J Hand Surg Am (2008)
Key Findings:
  • 24 patients with failed previous surgery
  • 88% achieved union
  • Large volume vascularized bone available
  • Requires microsurgical expertise
Clinical Implication: MFC graft is the preferred salvage option when pedicled VBG has failed or larger graft volume is needed

Viva Scenarios

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 1: Scaphoid Nonunion with AVN

EXAMINER

"A 28-year-old male presents with wrist pain 2 years after a fall. He recalls being told he fractured his wrist but didn't follow up after initial casting. CT shows a waist nonunion with humpback deformity (intrascaphoid angle 55 degrees). MRI shows no gadolinium enhancement of the proximal pole."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Thank you. This is a scaphoid nonunion with humpback deformity and avascular necrosis of the proximal pole - a Herbert D4 nonunion requiring vascularized bone graft.

Assessment summary: The humpback deformity (ISA 55 degrees, greater than 45 degree threshold) indicates significant collapse requiring correction. The lack of MRI enhancement confirms proximal pole AVN, which mandates a vascularized bone graft rather than a standard non-vascularized graft.

Classification: Herbert D4 (AVN nonunion) with significant humpback deformity.

Management: I would recommend surgical treatment with a 1,2 ICSRA vascularized bone graft via a dorsal approach. The key steps would be: (1) Expose the nonunion dorsally, (2) Identify and raise the 1,2 ICSRA pedicled graft from the dorsal distal radius, (3) Debride the nonunion site - I would expect no punctate bleeding confirming AVN, (4) Correct the humpback deformity, (5) Insert the vascularized graft maintaining pedicle integrity, (6) Fix with K-wires or a small headless screw.

Postoperative care: Thumb spica immobilization for 10-12 weeks minimum, serial CT scans to assess union. Expected union rate is 80-90% with VBG for AVN.

Rationale for VBG: Non-vascularized grafts in AVN have unacceptably low union rates (less than 60%). The 1,2 ICSRA graft provides vascularized bone to revascularize the proximal pole while avoiding the need for microsurgical anastomosis.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
AVN on MRI = VBG required (1,2 ICSRA)
Humpback greater than 45 degrees must be corrected
Non-VBG has unacceptable failure rate with AVN
Dorsal approach for VBG harvest and nonunion access
Union rate 80-90% with appropriate VBG
COMMON TRAPS
✗Using non-vascularized graft for AVN - high failure rate
✗Not measuring/correcting humpback deformity
✗Missing AVN on MRI leading to inappropriate graft choice
✗Volar approach when VBG needed (can't harvest 1,2 ICSRA)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if there is also SNAC Stage 2 arthritis?"
"What is your backup if intraop the nonunion looks viable?"
"What if the 1,2 ICSRA graft fails?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 2: Simple Scaphoid Nonunion - Viable Bone

EXAMINER

"A 22-year-old female presents with 1 year of wrist ache after a fall playing netball. She was initially treated in a cast for 6 weeks. CT shows a waist nonunion with minimal deformity (intrascaphoid angle 35 degrees). MRI shows normal proximal pole signal with good gadolinium enhancement."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Thank you. This is a scaphoid nonunion with viable proximal pole and minimal deformity - a Herbert D2/D3 nonunion suitable for non-vascularized bone grafting.

Assessment: The preserved MRI signal and gadolinium enhancement confirm the proximal pole is vascularized. The intrascaphoid angle of 35 degrees is within normal limits, so a wedge graft for deformity correction is not mandatory. This is a favorable situation for non-vascularized grafting.

Classification: Herbert D2 (pseudarthrosis) or D3 (sclerotic) based on CT appearance, with viable proximal pole.

Management: I would perform surgery via a volar approach (modified Russe). The steps would be: (1) Expose the nonunion through FCR/radial artery interval, (2) Debride the nonunion to punctate bleeding - I expect bleeding confirming vascularity, (3) Harvest cancellous or corticocancellous graft from the distal radius or iliac crest, (4) Insert graft into the prepared nonunion site, (5) Fix with a headless compression screw (e.g., Acutrak or Acutwist).

Postoperative: Thumb spica cast for 8-10 weeks, CT at 8 weeks to assess union. Expected union rate is 90-95% with viable bone and non-VBG.

Why non-VBG is appropriate: With confirmed vascularity on MRI and intraoperative punctate bleeding, a non-vascularized graft will incorporate successfully. VBG would be over-treatment and add unnecessary donor site morbidity.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
MRI enhancement = viable bone = non-VBG appropriate
Minimal humpback doesn't require wedge graft
Volar approach adequate for waist nonunion
Confirm vascularity with intraop bleeding
Union rate 90-95% with non-VBG in viable bone
COMMON TRAPS
✗Using VBG unnecessarily when bone is viable
✗Missing subtle humpback that needs correction
✗Inadequate debridement to bleeding bone
✗Poor screw placement not engaging proximal pole
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What screw would you use?"
"Where would you harvest graft?"
"What if intraop you find no punctate bleeding?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 3: Scaphoid Nonunion with SNAC Changes

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old manual laborer presents with progressive wrist pain and stiffness. Radiographs show a long-standing scaphoid nonunion with arthritic changes at the radial styloid and scaphocapitate joint. The capitolunate joint appears preserved."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Thank you. This patient has a scaphoid nonunion with established SNAC wrist - specifically SNAC Stage 2 with radial styloid and scaphocapitate arthritis, but preserved capitolunate joint.

Assessment: The presence of established SNAC changes indicates the nonunion is longstanding. The key finding is that the capitolunate joint is preserved, which opens salvage options. At Stage 2, simple nonunion repair is unlikely to address the existing arthritis.

Classification: SNAC Stage 2 - arthritis involves radial styloid-scaphoid and scaphoid-capitate articulations, with preserved capitolunate joint.

Management options: Given SNAC Stage 2, I would discuss two main options with the patient:

1. Scaphoid excision and 4-corner fusion (SLAC/SNAC procedure): This involves excising the scaphoid (the source of abnormal mechanics), and fusing the lunate, capitate, hamate, and triquetrum. This converts the wrist to a single functional unit while preserving the radiolunate articulation for motion. Expected motion is approximately 50% of normal, with good pain relief.

2. Proximal row carpectomy (PRC): This involves removing the scaphoid, lunate, and triquetrum, creating a new "joint" between the capitate head and lunate fossa of the radius. This requires an intact capitate head and lunate fossa, which would need to be confirmed on imaging. Simpler procedure but dependent on cartilage quality.

My preference for this manual laborer would be 4-corner fusion as it provides better grip strength and durability for heavy use.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
SNAC Stage 2 = radial styloid + scaphocapitate arthritis
Preserved capitolunate = salvage possible
4-corner fusion or PRC are the main options
Simple nonunion repair won't address established arthritis
4-corner fusion better for manual laborers (strength)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting nonunion repair when SNAC is established
✗Missing capitolunate arthritis that would change management
✗Not considering patient occupation in treatment choice
✗PRC in heavy laborer (may not tolerate loading)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the capitolunate joint was also arthritic?"
"How would you perform a 4-corner fusion?"
"What motion can patient expect after 4-corner fusion?"

MCQ Practice Points

Blood Supply Question

Q: What is the primary blood supply to the scaphoid and why is the proximal pole at risk for AVN?

A: The dorsal scaphoid branch of the radial artery provides 70-80% of the blood supply. It enters the scaphoid at the dorsal ridge (waist level) and supplies the bone via retrograde flow. The proximal pole receives only 20-30% of its supply directly, making it highly vulnerable to AVN when the waist is fractured.

Humpback Question

Q: What lateral intrascaphoid angle indicates significant humpback deformity requiring wedge graft correction?

A: A lateral intrascaphoid angle greater than 45 degrees indicates significant humpback deformity. Normal is less than 35 degrees. Angles between 35-45 degrees are borderline. Significant humpback must be corrected with a wedge graft (e.g., Fisk-Fernandez) to restore scaphoid length and allow union.

Graft Selection Question

Q: When is a vascularized bone graft indicated for scaphoid nonunion?

A: Vascularized bone graft (typically 1,2 ICSRA) is indicated for:

  1. AVN of the proximal pole (no MRI gadolinium enhancement)
  2. Failed previous non-vascularized graft
  3. Prolonged nonunion (greater than 5 years)

Non-vascularized graft in AVN has unacceptably low union rates (less than 60%). VBG achieves 80-90% union in AVN.

1,2 ICSRA Question

Q: Where is the 1,2 ICSRA located and how is it harvested?

A: The 1,2 ICSRA (1,2 Intercompartmental Supraretinacular Artery) runs between the 1st extensor compartment (APL, EPB) and the 2nd extensor compartment (ECRL, ECRB) in the supraretinacular plane (above the extensor retinaculum). It is harvested from the dorsal distal radius as a pedicled bone flap, maintaining the vascular pedicle for transfer to the scaphoid nonunion site.

SNAC Progression Question

Q: What is the sequence of joint involvement in SNAC wrist?

A: SNAC wrist progresses through 4 stages:

  • Stage 1: Radial styloid to scaphoid
  • Stage 2: + Scaphocapitate joint
  • Stage 3: + Capitolunate joint
  • Stage 4: Pancarpal (including radiolunate)

Key difference from SLAC: In SNAC, radiolunate is preserved until Stage 4, allowing salvage procedures (4-corner fusion, PRC) in earlier stages.

Natural History Question

Q: What percentage of untreated scaphoid nonunions develop arthritis?

A: 100% of untreated scaphoid nonunions will eventually develop SNAC wrist arthritis. Mack et al (1984) showed 97% had radioscaphoid arthritis within 10 years. This makes observation inappropriate - all symptomatic nonunions should be treated surgically.

Australian Context

Referral Pathways

  • Scaphoid nonunion should be referred to hand surgery units
  • VBG requires microsurgical capability
  • Complex cases may need tertiary hand surgery center
  • Early referral prevents SNAC progression

Australian Epidemiology

  • Scaphoid fractures common in young working males
  • Nonunion rate 5-10% even with appropriate treatment
  • Higher rates in agricultural/manual workers
  • Delayed presentation common in rural areas

Surgical Considerations

  • Rural/regional patients may need transfer
  • Smoking cessation support pre-op
  • CT and MRI availability varies by location
  • Allied health access for rehabilitation

Return to Work

  • Light duties: 8-12 weeks post-op
  • Manual work: 4-6 months if union achieved
  • WorkCover implications for delayed diagnosis
  • Occupational therapy for functional rehab

Medicolegal Considerations

Common litigation areas for scaphoid nonunion:

  1. Missed initial fracture - failure to diagnose acute scaphoid fracture leading to nonunion
  2. Delayed treatment - failure to refer established nonunion appropriately
  3. Inappropriate graft selection - using non-VBG when AVN present
  4. Inadequate informed consent - not discussing SNAC progression risk

Document thoroughly: imaging findings, vascularity assessment, graft rationale, and patient counseling about risks and alternatives.

SCAPHOID NONUNION

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Statistics

  • •5-15% nonunion rate (30% proximal pole)
  • •100% progress to SNAC wrist if untreated
  • •80% blood from dorsal scaphoid branch (retrograde)
  • •Only 20-30% of proximal pole has direct supply

Herbert D Classification

  • •D1: Fibrous union - ORIF, may not need graft
  • •D2: Pseudarthrosis - ORIF + bone graft
  • •D3: Sclerotic - Debride + extensive graft
  • •D4: AVN - VASCULARIZED bone graft required

Humpback Deformity

  • •Flexion through nonunion site
  • •Creates dorsal convexity (humpback)
  • •Measure lateral intrascaphoid angle
  • •Greater than 45 degrees = significant = wedge graft needed

Graft Selection

  • •Viable bone (MRI signal+) = Non-vascularized graft
  • •AVN (no MRI enhancement) = VBG (1,2 ICSRA)
  • •Failed surgery = Free vascularized (MFC)
  • •1,2 ICSRA: between 1st and 2nd compartments, supraretinacular

SNAC Stages

  • •Stage 1: Radial styloid-scaphoid
  • •Stage 2: + Scaphocapitate
  • •Stage 3: + Capitolunate
  • •Stage 4: Pancarpal (including radiolunate)

Must Know for Exam

  • •Retrograde blood supply - proximal pole at risk
  • •MRI with gadolinium for AVN assessment
  • •VBG (1,2 ICSRA) for AVN - gold standard
  • •Correct humpback with wedge graft
  • •All untreated nonunions become SNAC
Quick Stats
Reading Time99 min
Related Topics

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures