Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Shoulder Dislocations

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Shoulder Dislocations

Comprehensive guide to shoulder dislocations - anterior vs posterior mechanisms, Bankart and Hill-Sachs lesions, acute management, surgical indications, and recurrence risk for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2024-12-15
High Yield Overview

SHOULDER DISLOCATIONS - ANTERIOR VS POSTERIOR

95% Anterior | Age Predicts Recurrence | Hill-Sachs and Bankart

95%Anterior dislocations
90%Recurrence if under 20
25%Recurrence if over 40
67%Bankart lesion rate

DIRECTION OF DISLOCATION

Anterior
Pattern95% - arm abducted, externally rotated
TreatmentClosed reduction, assess stability
Posterior
Pattern3-4% - seizure, electrocution, FOOSH
TreatmentClosed reduction, CT scan
Inferior (Luxatio Erecta)
PatternRare - arm fixed overhead
TreatmentClosed reduction, check axillary nerve

Critical Must-Knows

  • Anterior dislocation: Mechanism = abduction + external rotation (ABER); associated Bankart (anterior labrum) + Hill-Sachs (posterolateral head)
  • Posterior dislocation: 50% MISSED on AP X-ray - look for lightbulb sign, get axillary lateral
  • Age is the strongest predictor of recurrence: under 20 = 90%, over 40 = 25%
  • First-time dislocation management is controversial: immobilization vs surgical stabilization in young athletes
  • Axillary nerve at risk (around 30%) - test deltoid and regimental badge sensation

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Posterior dislocation: seizure + internal rotation + empty antecubital fossa = posterior until proven otherwise
  • "
    Engaging Hill-Sachs: lesion engages on Bankart defect during functional ROM - needs surgery
  • "
    First-time dislocators under 25 in contact sports: consider early arthroscopic Bankart repair
  • "
    Bone loss over 25% (glenoid) or over 40% (humeral) - may need Latarjet or bone grafting

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

2-panel AP shoulder X-rays showing bilateral anterior glenohumeral dislocations - humeral heads displaced medially and inferiorly below the coracoid process. Timestamps visible (14 12:51).
Click to expand
2-panel AP shoulder X-rays showing bilateral anterior glenohumeral dislocations - humeral heads displaced medially and inferiorly below the coracoid pCredit: Dlimi F et al. - J Orthop Traumatol via Open-i (NIH) - PMC3284668 (CC-BY 4.0)
2-panel (A-B) AP shoulder X-rays from motor vehicle accident: (A) right shoulder with anterior dislocation and glenoid rim fracture (white arrows/arrowheads), (B) left shoulder showing similar anterio
Click to expand
2-panel (A-B) AP shoulder X-rays from motor vehicle accident: (A) right shoulder with anterior dislocation and glenoid rim fracture (white arrows/arroCredit: Abu-Zidan FM et al. - Saudi Med J via Open-i (NIH) - PMC4707410 (CC-BY 4.0)
Single AP chest X-ray demonstrating bilateral anterior shoulder dislocations - both humeral heads displaced inferiorly and medially with empty glenoid fossae visible.
Click to expand
Single AP chest X-ray demonstrating bilateral anterior shoulder dislocations - both humeral heads displaced inferiorly and medially with empty glenoidCredit: Silva LP et al. - Rev Bras Ortop via Open-i (NIH) - PMC4799227 (CC-BY 4.0)
2-panel (a-b) AP shoulder X-rays showing pre- and post-reduction: (a) anterior dislocation with humeral head displaced under coracoid, (b) successful closed reduction with humeral head relocated into
Click to expand
2-panel (a-b) AP shoulder X-rays showing pre- and post-reduction: (a) anterior dislocation with humeral head displaced under coracoid, (b) successful Credit: Takase F et al. - Case Rep Orthop via Open-i (NIH) - PMC4082929 (CC-BY 4.0)
Hill-Sachs deformity on AP shoulder radiograph
Click to expand
AP shoulder radiograph demonstrating a Hill-Sachs lesion - the characteristic posterolateral humeral head impaction fracture resulting from anterior shoulder dislocation. The defect is created when the soft posterolateral head impacts against the hard anterior glenoid rim during dislocation.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

Critical Shoulder Dislocation Exam Points

Do NOT Miss Posterior!

50% of posterior dislocations are missed on initial presentation. AP X-ray may look normal. Lightbulb sign, rim sign, and loss of half-moon overlap are key. ALWAYS get axillary or Y-view.

Age = Recurrence

Under 20 years: 90% recurrence. 20-40 years: 60% recurrence. Over 40 years: 25% recurrence but higher rotator cuff tear risk. Age guides surgical decision-making.

Axillary Nerve

Axillary nerve injury in up to 30% of anterior dislocations. Test deltoid power and regimental badge sensation BEFORE and AFTER reduction. Document carefully.

Associated Lesions

Bankart lesion: Anterior labrum avulsion (67%). Hill-Sachs: Posterolateral humeral head impaction (40-90%). Bony Bankart: Associated bony fragment (5-10%).

Quick Decision Guide

PatientPresentationTreatmentKey Pearl
Young athlete under 20First anterior dislocationConsider early Bankart repair90% recurrence if conservative
Adult 30-50 yearsFirst anterior dislocationConservative, sling 2-4 weeksActivity modification, physio
Elderly over 60First anterior dislocationConservative, early motionCheck rotator cuff - high tear rate
Any agePosterior dislocationUrgent CT scan after reduction50% missed on AP - always axillary view
Any ageRecurrent instabilitySurgical stabilizationAssess bone loss - Bankart vs Latarjet
Mnemonic

ABERAnterior Dislocation Features

A
Abduction
Arm abducted during injury
B
Bankart lesion
Anterior labrum avulsion
E
External rotation
Mechanism of injury
R
Rotator interval stretched
Anterior capsular damage

Memory Hook:ABER position causes anterior dislocation - arm ABducted and Externally Rotated!

Mnemonic

SEIZEPosterior Dislocation Causes

S
Seizure
Most common cause - internal rotators overpower
E
Electrocution
Massive muscle contraction
I
Internal rotation fixed
Clinical sign - arm held in IR
Z
Z-view needed
Y-view or axillary to diagnose
E
Empty antecubital fossa
Head not palpable anteriorly

Memory Hook:SEIZE the diagnosis - posterior dislocations occur during SEIZures and need Z-views!

Mnemonic

LIGHTSX-ray Signs of Posterior Dislocation

L
Lightbulb sign
Head looks like lightbulb in internal rotation
I
Internal rotation locked
Arm fixed in IR
G
Gross widening of joint space
Over 6mm joint space
H
Half-moon overlap lost
Normal glenoid-head overlap absent
T
Trough sign
Reverse Hill-Sachs on AP view
S
Scapular Y confirms
Head posterior to glenoid

Memory Hook:If you see LIGHTS on the X-ray, think posterior dislocation - the 'lightbulb' is turned on!

Mnemonic

AXILLARYNerve at Risk in Shoulder Dislocation

A
Axillary nerve
Most commonly injured (30%)
X
X-ray before and after
Document reduction
I
Inferior capsule proximity
Nerve runs just below capsule
L
Lateral deltoid weakness
Test abduction
L
Loss of sensation
Regimental badge area
A
Always document
Pre and post reduction
R
Recovery expected
90% recover by 6 months
Y
You must test it
Medicolegal requirement

Memory Hook:AXILLARY nerve - Always eXamine It, Look for Lateral deltoid, Always Record it, Yes document it!

Overview and Epidemiology

Why This Topic Matters

Shoulder dislocations are the most common major joint dislocation. Management has evolved significantly with evidence supporting early surgical stabilization in young athletes. The examiner will test your understanding of recurrence risk, associated lesions, and surgical indications.

Demographics

  • Bimodal distribution: young males (sports) and elderly (falls)
  • Male:Female ratio: 2.5:1
  • Peak incidence: 20-30 years
  • Contact sports highest risk (AFL, rugby)

Impact

  • Missing work/sport during recovery
  • High recurrence rate in young patients
  • Risk of progressive bone loss
  • Potential career-ending for athletes

Anatomy and Mechanism

Key Anatomical Concept

The glenohumeral joint sacrifices stability for mobility. The glenoid covers only 25-30% of the humeral head, relying on the labrum, capsule, and rotator cuff for stability. The labrum increases socket depth by 50% and contact area by 75%.

Static Stabilizers

StructureFunctionInjury Pattern
Glenoid labrumDeepens socket by 50%, bumper effectBankart lesion (anterior), Kim lesion (posterior)
IGHL (Inferior Glenohumeral Ligament)Primary restraint in ABER positionTorn in anterior dislocation
MGHL (Middle GHL)Restraint in 45° abductionVariable anatomy (absent in 30%)
SGHL (Superior GHL)Resists inferior translation at restLess relevant to dislocation
Coracohumeral ligamentResists external rotation at restPosterior dislocation injury

IGHL Anatomy

The Inferior Glenohumeral Ligament (IGHL) is the primary restraint to anterior dislocation in the ABER (Abduction External Rotation) position. It has anterior band, posterior band, and axillary pouch. The anterior band of IGHL is most critical for anterior stability.

Dynamic Stabilizers

StructureFunctionClinical Relevance
SubscapularisAnterior rotator cuff, internal rotationLesser tuberosity avulsion, anterior stabilizer
Rotator cuff (all)Compresses head into glenoidBalanced force couple, elderly tears
Biceps long headHumeral head depressionSLAP lesions with instability
Scapular stabilizersMaintain glenoid positionScapular dyskinesis worsens instability

Mechanism by Direction

Anterior Dislocation (95%)

  • ABER position: Abduction + External Rotation
  • Fall on outstretched hand
  • Direct blow to posterior shoulder
  • Contact sports tackle
  • Head displaces anteroinferior

Posterior Dislocation (3-4%)

  • Seizure (most common cause)
  • Electrocution
  • Direct blow to anterior shoulder
  • Fall on flexed, IR arm
  • Internal rotators overpower external

Inferior Dislocation (Luxatio Erecta)

Hyperabduction injury with the arm locked overhead. High association with axillary nerve injury, rotator cuff tears, and greater tuberosity fractures. Reduction by traction-countertraction then adduction.

Classification Systems

Classification by Direction of Dislocation

TypeFrequencyMechanismKey Features
Anterior (Subcoracoid)95%ABER position - Abduction + External RotationBankart lesion + Hill-Sachs, axillary nerve at risk
Posterior3-4%Seizure, electrocution, direct blow50% missed on AP - lightbulb sign, fixed IR
Inferior (Luxatio Erecta)Less than 1%Hyperabduction - arm locked overheadHighest nerve injury rate, rotator cuff tears
MultidirectionalVariableAtraumatic instability, generalized laxityRequires different surgical approach

Anterior Subclassification

Anterior dislocations are subclassified by humeral head position: Subcoracoid (most common), Subglenoid, Subclavicular (rare), and Intrathoracic (very rare). All represent variations of anterior displacement with similar management principles.

Instability Classification Systems

Stanmore Classification (Triangle):

PoleTypeCharacteristicsTreatment
Pole I (Structural)TraumaticSingle direction, Bankart lesionArthroscopic Bankart repair
Pole II (Atraumatic)HyperlaxityMultidirectional, no structural lesionRehabilitation focused
Pole III (Muscle Patterning)Habitual/VoluntaryAbnormal muscle recruitment patternsPsychology referral, therapy

AMBRI vs TUBS:

TUBS

  • Traumatic
  • Unidirectional
  • Bankart lesion
  • Surgery often needed

AMBRI

  • Atraumatic
  • Multidirectional
  • Bilateral
  • Rehabilitation first
  • Inferior capsular shift (if fails)

Bone Loss Assessment

Glenoid Bone Loss Thresholds

Glenoid bone loss over 25% significantly increases Bankart repair failure. The ISIS score (Instability Severity Index Score) helps quantify recurrence risk and guide surgical decision-making.

ISIS Score (Instability Severity Index Score):

FactorPoints
Age under 20 years2
Contact/forced overhead sport2
Hyperlaxity1
Hill-Sachs on AP X-ray2
Glenoid bone loss on AP X-ray2
Total0-10
  • Score under 4: Bankart repair appropriate
  • Score 4 or higher: Consider Latarjet (higher failure risk with Bankart)

Glenoid Track Concept

The glenoid track is calculated as 83% of intact glenoid width minus any bone loss. If the Hill-Sachs lesion extends medial to this track (off-track), it will engage during functional ROM and requires additional surgery (remplissage, bone grafting, or Latarjet).

Associated Lesions

Lesions with Anterior Dislocation

LesionLocationIncidenceSignificance
Bankart lesionAnterior labrum avulsion67-97%Essential lesion - repair for stability
Hill-Sachs lesionPosterolateral humeral head40-90%Engaging lesion needs addressing
Bony BankartAnterior glenoid fracture5-10%Bone loss over 25% needs Latarjet
HAGL lesionHumeral avulsion of GHL2-10%Often missed, repair to humerus
ALPSA lesionAnterior labrum periosteal sleeve avulsionVariableMedially displaced labrum, heals poorly
Rotator cuff tearSupraspinatus usuallyVariable by ageOver 40 years: up to 40% incidence

Hill-Sachs and Bone Loss

An engaging Hill-Sachs lesion catches on the anterior glenoid rim during external rotation. The glenoid track concept helps determine if the Hill-Sachs is on-track (non-engaging) or off-track (engaging). Off-track lesions need additional surgery (remplissage or bone grafting).

Arthroscopic remplissage procedure for engaging Hill-Sachs lesion
Click to expand
Arthroscopic remplissage technique for engaging Hill-Sachs lesion: (A,B) fluoroscopic images showing suture anchor placement into the Hill-Sachs defect with posterior capsule and infraspinatus tendon captured to fill the bony defect, preventing engagement on the anterior glenoid rim.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

Lesions with Posterior Dislocation

LesionLocationSignificance
Reverse BankartPosterior labrum avulsionRepair for posterior stability
Reverse Hill-Sachs (McLaughlin)Anteromedial humeral headMay need bone grafting or McLaughlin transfer
Posterior glenoid fracturePosterior glenoid rimBone loss assessment needed
Kim lesionIncomplete posterior labral tearSubtle MRI finding

Reverse Hill-Sachs Size

Reverse Hill-Sachs (McLaughlin lesion) involving over 25% of the articular surface may require: (1) Lesser tuberosity transfer (McLaughlin), (2) Allograft reconstruction, or (3) Arthroplasty if over 50%.

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Mechanism: ABER for anterior, seizure for posterior
  • First or recurrent episode (recurrence is key!)
  • Reduction: Self-reduced or ED reduction
  • Sport/occupation: Contact sports, overhead work
  • Hand dominance: Affects surgical decision
  • Previous treatment: Physio, surgery, bracing

Examination - Anterior

  • Squared-off shoulder: Loss of deltoid contour
  • Humeral head palpable anteriorly
  • Empty glenoid posteriorly
  • Arm held in slight abduction and ER
  • Neurovascular: Axillary nerve (deltoid, regimental badge)
  • Apprehension test positive after reduction

Anterior vs Posterior Clinical Signs

FindingAnteriorPosterior
Arm positionAbducted, externally rotatedAdducted, internally rotated (fixed)
Humeral headPalpable anteriorlyNot palpable anteriorly (empty)
Shoulder contourSquared off, flattenedFlattened anteriorly, fullness posteriorly
MovementUnable to internally rotateUnable to externally rotate (locked)
Common missRarely missedMissed 50% of time!

Posterior Dislocation - Don't Miss It!

50% of posterior dislocations are missed on initial presentation. Key clinical clues: arm fixed in internal rotation, cannot externally rotate, empty antecubital fossa (head not palpable anteriorly), and history of seizure or electrocution.

Clinical photograph of bilateral anterior shoulder dislocations
Click to expand
Clinical examination of bilateral anterior shoulder dislocations: The characteristic 'squared-off' shoulder appearance is visible bilaterally, caused by loss of the normal rounded deltoid contour when the humeral heads are displaced anteriorly from the glenoid fossae. This clinical sign, combined with palpable humeral head anteriorly and empty glenoid posteriorly, is pathognomonic for anterior dislocation.Credit: Dlimi F et al., J Orthop Traumatol - CC BY 4.0

Investigations

Imaging Protocol

First LinePlain Radiographs - Trauma Series

AP (true AP in scapular plane), Axillary lateral, and Scapular Y view. NEVER rely on AP alone - must get axillary or Y-view to exclude posterior dislocation.

If Posterior SuspectedAxillary Lateral (Essential)

Shows head position relative to glenoid. If patient cannot abduct (Velpeau view alternative - arm across chest, lean back for axillary).

Post-ReductionRepeat X-rays

Confirm reduction with repeat trauma series. Document any fractures visible post-reduction.

Definitive AssessmentMRI or CT

MRI: Best for labrum (Bankart), capsule, rotator cuff. CT: Best for bone loss quantification (glenoid and humeral).

Bilateral anterior shoulder dislocations on X-ray
Click to expand
Two-panel AP shoulder X-rays demonstrating bilateral anterior glenohumeral dislocations: both humeral heads are displaced inferomedially under the coracoid process with empty glenoid fossae. Bilateral dislocations are rare and typically result from high-energy trauma or seizures. Classic anterior dislocation position = head inferior to coracoid with loss of normal acromiohumeral relationship.Credit: Dlimi F et al., J Orthop Traumatol - CC BY 4.0
Bilateral anterior shoulder dislocations with associated glenoid fractures
Click to expand
Two-panel AP shoulder radiographs from motor vehicle accident: (A) Right shoulder with anterior dislocation and associated glenoid rim fracture (white arrows and arrowheads indicating fracture fragments), (B) Left shoulder showing similar anterior dislocation pattern. Associated bony Bankart lesions (glenoid rim fractures) occur in 5-10% of anterior dislocations and affect surgical decision-making.Credit: Abu-Zidan FM et al., Saudi Med J - CC BY 4.0
AP chest X-ray showing bilateral anterior shoulder dislocations
Click to expand
Single AP chest radiograph demonstrating bilateral anterior shoulder dislocations: both humeral heads are displaced inferiorly and medially with empty glenoid fossae visible. This overview image shows the typical inferomedial position of the humeral heads in anterior dislocations. Simultaneous bilateral dislocations are rare, usually resulting from high-energy trauma, seizures, or electrocution.Credit: Silva LP et al., Rev Bras Ortop - CC BY 4.0

X-ray Signs of Posterior Dislocation

Posterior shoulder dislocation with lightbulb sign and CT confirmation
Click to expand
Posterior shoulder dislocation imaging: (A) AP radiograph demonstrating the 'lightbulb sign' - internally rotated humeral head appearing round, (B) Axillary/Y-view confirming posterior head displacement, (C) Axial CT showing posterior dislocation with reverse Hill-Sachs (McLaughlin) lesion on the anteromedial humeral head.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0
Posterior shoulder dislocation X-ray teaching comparison
Click to expand
AP radiograph comparison demonstrating subtle signs of posterior dislocation: asterisk indicates the abnormal glenoid-humeral relationship (rim sign), arrow shows the trough line representing reverse Hill-Sachs defect. These subtle findings are frequently missed - 50% of posterior dislocations are missed on initial presentation.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0
Posterior shoulder dislocation demonstrating lightbulb sign
Click to expand
AP shoulder radiograph demonstrating the 'lightbulb sign' - the humeral head appears rounded and symmetrical due to internal rotation, characteristic of posterior dislocation. Note the loss of normal glenoid-humeral overlap. Always obtain an axillary or Y-view when posterior dislocation is suspected, as 50% are missed on AP views alone.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

Lightbulb Sign

Humeral head appears round like a lightbulb on AP due to internal rotation. Loss of normal head contour.

Rim Sign

Increased distance between medial head and anterior glenoid rim (over 6mm). Joint space widening.

Trough Sign

Vertical sclerotic line on medial humeral head = reverse Hill-Sachs impaction fracture visible en face.

Lost Half-Moon

Normal overlap of humeral head on glenoid rim is lost when head displaces posteriorly.

MRI for Instability

Shoulder MRI for instability assessment
Click to expand
Axial MRI of shoulder for instability assessment: (A) T1-weighted and (B) T2-weighted sequences demonstrating the glenoid labrum and humeral head relationship. MRI is the gold standard for assessing soft tissue lesions including Bankart, ALPSA, HAGL, and rotator cuff tears.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0
StructureSequenceFinding
Bankart lesionFat-suppressed T2, MR arthrogramAnterior labrum avulsion with periosteal stripping
ALPSA lesionMR arthrogramMedially displaced labrum adherent to scapular neck
HAGL lesionCoronal T2Humeral-side avulsion of IGHL - J-sign
Hill-SachsAxial T2Posterolateral humeral head defect
Rotator cuffT2 coronal and sagittalTear assessment especially in over 40s

CT for Bone Loss Quantification

Hill-Sachs lesion CT measurement technique
Click to expand
Axial CT images demonstrating Hill-Sachs lesion measurement technique: (A) pre-remplissage showing the posterolateral humeral head defect, (B) post-remplissage showing filling of the defect. The extent of Hill-Sachs is measured as a percentage of humeral head diameter to determine if the lesion is 'on-track' or 'off-track'.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0
Hill-Sachs angle measurement on CT
Click to expand
Axial CT demonstrating Hill-Sachs angle measurement (160.968/199.032 degrees). Quantifying Hill-Sachs size is essential for the glenoid track concept - determining whether the lesion will engage on the glenoid rim during functional external rotation.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

Glenoid Bone Loss Calculation

Use en-face view of glenoid on 3D CT. Normal glenoid is a circle (inferior 2/3). Calculate bone loss as percentage of intact circle. Over 25% glenoid bone loss = high failure of soft tissue repair alone, consider Latarjet.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
shoulder dislocations management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for shoulder dislocationsCredit: OrthoVellum

Pre-Reduction Checklist

Before reduction: (1) Document neurovascular status (axillary nerve!), (2) Confirm diagnosis with X-ray, (3) Obtain consent, (4) Ensure adequate analgesia/sedation, (5) Have post-reduction X-ray plan.

Reduction Techniques - Anterior Dislocation

Reduction Methods

PreferredStimson Technique

Patient prone, arm hanging off table. Attach 2-5kg weight. Gentle internal/external rotation. Uses gravity and muscle fatigue. Least force.

AlternativeExternal Rotation Method

Patient supine, elbow at 90°. Slow external rotation while adducting arm. Gentle, low force, minimal sedation.

No TractionCunningham Technique

Patient seated, massage biceps, deltoid, and trapezius to relax. Patient leans forward. No traction - muscle relaxation only.

HistoricalHippocratic/Kocher

Traction-countertraction methods. Higher force, historical. Kocher has fracture risk - avoid.

Anterior shoulder dislocation pre and post reduction comparison
Click to expand
Two-panel (a-b) AP shoulder X-rays demonstrating successful closed reduction: (a) Pre-reduction showing anterior dislocation with humeral head displaced inferomedially under the coracoid process. (b) Post-reduction showing humeral head concentrically located within the glenoid fossa with normal joint alignment restored. Always obtain post-reduction X-rays to confirm reduction and assess for associated fractures.Credit: Takase F et al., Case Rep Orthop - CC BY 4.0

Post-Reduction Steps

  • Repeat neurovascular exam (document!)
  • Post-reduction X-rays (confirm reduction)
  • Immobilize in sling
  • Provide analgesia
  • Arrange follow-up and MRI

Failed Reduction

  • Interposed tissue (rotator cuff, biceps)
  • Associated fracture blocking
  • Inadequate anesthesia
  • May need open reduction
  • Posterior dislocations often harder

First-Time Anterior Dislocation Management

Age GroupRecurrence RiskManagementEvidence
Under 20 years90%Consider early arthroscopic Bankart repairRCTs show reduced recurrence
20-30 years, athlete60-70%Consider early stabilization in contact sportShared decision-making
30-40 years40-50%Conservative, physio, reassess if recursRecurrence lower, surgery if fails
Over 40 yearsUnder 25%Conservative, check rotator cuff on MRIHigh cuff tear rate - address if present

The Controversy

First-time dislocators under 25 in contact sports: multiple RCTs (Kirkley, Bottoni, Jakobsen) show arthroscopic Bankart repair reduces recurrence from 75-90% to 10-15%. However, conservative treatment is still reasonable with informed patient choice.

Surgical Options for Recurrent Instability

ProcedureIndicationKey Points
Arthroscopic Bankart repairGlenoid bone loss under 25%, no engaging Hill-SachsGold standard soft tissue repair, 10-15% recurrence
Latarjet procedureGlenoid bone loss over 25%, revision Bankart failureCoracoid transfer, sling effect, bone block, 5% recurrence
RemplissageLarge Hill-Sachs, off-track lesionInfraspinatus tenodesis into Hill-Sachs defect
Open Bankart repairHAGL lesion, capsular shift neededLower recurrence in some studies, bigger incision
Bone graftingLarge reverse Hill-Sachs (posterior)McLaughlin, allograft, or arthroplasty if severe

Latarjet Complications

Latarjet has higher complication rate than Bankart: nerve injury (musculocutaneous, axillary), nonunion, hardware issues, OA. Reserve for true bone loss over 25% or failed Bankart. Not a first-line procedure.

Posterior Dislocation Management

Management Steps

RecognitionStep 1

Recognize the diagnosis! History of seizure, fixed IR, unable to ER. Get axillary view.

CT ScanStep 2

CT scan before reduction to assess reverse Hill-Sachs size and chronicity. Defect size guides treatment.

ReductionStep 3

Traction, adduction, then gentle external rotation. May need GA. Often more difficult than anterior.

Post-Reduction AssessmentStep 4

Assess stability in external rotation. If unstable or large reverse Hill-Sachs - surgery likely needed.

Reverse Hill-Sachs SizeManagement
Under 20%Immobilize in external rotation, physiotherapy
20-40%Lesser tuberosity transfer (McLaughlin) or allograft
40-50%Consider hemiarthroplasty or reverse TSA
Over 50%Arthroplasty (reverse TSA in elderly)

Surgical Technique

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

Operative Steps

PositioningStep 1

Beach chair or lateral decubitus with arm in traction. Author preference varies. Beach chair = easier orientation, lateral = better inferior access.

Portal PlacementStep 2

Posterior viewing portal (soft spot), anterior working portal (rotator interval), anteroinferior accessory portal for anchor placement.

Labral MobilizationStep 3

Elevate labrum off glenoid neck with elevator. Mobilize until subscapularis seen medially. Fresh bleeding edge essential.

Glenoid PreparationStep 4

Rasp glenoid rim to create bleeding bone bed. Do not over-decorticate (bone loss).

Anchor PlacementStep 5

3-4 suture anchors from 5 o'clock to 3 o'clock (right shoulder). Inferior anchors most important - capture IGHL.

Labral RepairStep 6

Pass sutures through labrum, tie sequentially. Goal: bumper effect restoration, recreate labral height on glenoid rim.

Technical Pearls

  • Inferior anchor first (most important)
  • Labral shift superiorly - recreate tension
  • On glenoid face, not edge (prevents erosion)
  • 3-4 anchors standard (more if SLAP)
  • Check reduction with probe

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Inadequate mobilization - labrum stays medial
  • Anchors placed too laterally - poor healing
  • Missing inferior extent - recurrence
  • Not addressing Hill-Sachs if engaging
  • Missing HAGL lesion - lateral capsule

Latarjet Coracoid Transfer

Key Steps

Step 1Coracoid Harvest

Expose coracoid, detach pectoralis minor and CA ligament. Osteotomize at junction with scapula. Decoricate undersurface.

Step 2Split Subscapularis

Access glenoid at junction of upper 2/3 and lower 1/3 of subscapularis (horizontal split). Preserve muscle.

Step 3Glenoid Preparation

Decoricate anterior glenoid. Position for coracoid placement flush with articular surface.

Step 4Coracoid Fixation

Two screws parallel to glenoid face. Conjoined tendon provides sling effect when arm in ABER.

Triple Effect of Latarjet

Bone block effect: Increases glenoid arc. Sling effect: Conjoined tendon tightens in ABER. Capsular repair: Stump of CA ligament repairs to capsule. This is why it works for bone loss and revision cases.

Complications

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Recurrent instability10-15% after BankartYoung age, contact sport, bone loss, poor tissueRevision surgery, consider Latarjet
Axillary nerve injuryUp to 30% initialInferior dislocation, elderly, delayed reductionMost recover 3-6 months, EMG at 3 months
Rotator cuff tearOver 40 years: 40%Age over 40, high-energy, recurrentMRI assessment, repair if symptomatic
Stiffness/Frozen shoulder5-10%Prolonged immobilization, elderlyEarly motion, physiotherapy
Osteoarthritis10-20% long-termRecurrent dislocations, bone lossActivity modification, arthroplasty if severe
Vascular injuryRareHigh-energy, elderly (axillary artery)Urgent vascular surgery consultation

Axillary Nerve Recovery

90% of axillary nerve injuries recover within 3-6 months. If no clinical recovery by 3 months, obtain EMG/NCS. Consider nerve exploration if no recovery by 6-9 months.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation After Bankart Repair

ProtectionWeek 0-2

Sling full-time. Pendulum exercises only. Ice and analgesia. No external rotation.

Early MotionWeek 2-6

Sling when out. Active elbow and hand. Passive forward flexion, ER to neutral only. No combined ABD+ER.

StrengtheningWeek 6-12

Wean sling. AROM all directions. Isometric then isotonic strengthening. Rotator cuff and scapular stabilizers.

Sport-SpecificMonth 3-6

Full ROM. Progressive resistance. Sport-specific drills. No contact until 6 months.

Return to SportMonth 6+

Full strength and ROM. Functional testing. Return to contact sport 6 months minimum.

Immobilization Position Controversy

Internal vs External rotation immobilization: Some studies suggested ER immobilization reduces recurrence (Itoi) by approximating Bankart lesion to glenoid. However, meta-analyses show no significant difference. Practical: IR sling is easier and standard.

Outcomes and Prognosis

FactorBetter OutcomeWorse Outcome
Age at first dislocationOlder (over 30)Younger (under 20)
Number of dislocationsSingle episodeMultiple recurrences
Bone lossMinimal (under 15%)Significant (over 25%)
Sport demandsNon-contactContact/collision sports
Tissue qualityGood labral tissueAttenuated/ALPSA pattern

Evidence Base and Key Trials

Kirkley et al. - First-Time Dislocation RCT

1
Kirkley A et al. • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2005)
Key Findings:
  • RCT of first-time anterior dislocation in under 30s
  • Arthroscopic Bankart vs immobilization + physio
  • Recurrence: 15% surgery vs 47% conservative
  • Better WOSI scores with surgery
Clinical Implication: Early stabilization reduces recurrence in young first-time dislocators. Consider for under 25 in contact sports.
Limitation: Single surgeon, relatively small numbers.

Jakobsen et al. - Young Military Athletes

1
Jakobsen BW et al. • Arthroscopy (2007)
Key Findings:
  • RCT: First-time dislocators under 25
  • Arthroscopic Bankart vs conservative
  • Recurrence: 3% surgery vs 54% conservative at 10 years
  • NNT = 2 (treat 2 patients to prevent 1 recurrence)
Clinical Implication: Strong evidence for early surgery in young athletic patients.
Limitation: Military population, high-demand activity.

Glenoid Track Concept - Di Giacomo

3
Di Giacomo G et al. • Arthroscopy (2014)
Key Findings:
  • Defines engaging vs non-engaging Hill-Sachs
  • Glenoid track = 83% of glenoid width minus bone loss
  • Hill-Sachs medial to glenoid track = engaging (off-track)
  • Off-track lesions need additional procedure (remplissage)
Clinical Implication: Use glenoid track to determine if Bankart alone sufficient or if Hill-Sachs needs addressing.
Limitation: Biomechanical concept, clinical validation ongoing.

Latarjet vs Bankart Systematic Review

2
Bliven et al. • Orthop J Sports Med (2020)
Key Findings:
  • Meta-analysis comparing Latarjet vs Bankart
  • Latarjet lower recurrence (3% vs 11%)
  • Latarjet higher complication rate (15% vs 8%)
  • Latarjet for bone loss over 25% or failed Bankart
Clinical Implication: Latarjet more stable but higher complications. Reserve for bone loss or revision.
Limitation: Heterogeneous studies, selection bias.

Immobilization Position - Review

Paterson WH et al. • Cochrane Database (2010)
Key Findings:
  • Early studies suggested ER immobilization better
  • Meta-analysis found no significant difference
  • ER theoretically approximates Bankart to glenoid
  • Practical: IR immobilization remains standard
Clinical Implication: Either position acceptable. IR more practical and patient-tolerated.
Limitation: Variable protocols and compliance.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: First-Time Anterior Dislocation in Young Athlete

EXAMINER

"A 19-year-old AFL footballer presents to ED with left shoulder pain after a tackle. He felt his shoulder 'pop out' and it was reduced on the field by the team physio. X-rays show a reduced glenohumeral joint. He is keen to return to football as soon as possible. How would you manage him?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a first-time anterior shoulder dislocation in a 19-year-old AFL player - a challenging scenario given the high recurrence risk but also his desire for rapid return to elite sport. I would take a systematic approach: First, confirm the diagnosis with proper trauma series X-rays including axillary view to ensure reduction is maintained. Second, document neurovascular status, specifically axillary nerve function - test deltoid power and regimental badge sensation. Third, arrange an MRI to assess for Bankart lesion, Hill-Sachs size, and any SLAP or rotator cuff involvement. For management, I would counsel him that his recurrence risk is approximately 90% with conservative treatment given his age and contact sport. Evidence from Kirkley and Jakobsen RCTs shows arthroscopic Bankart repair reduces recurrence to 10-15%. I would recommend early arthroscopic stabilization before the season, which allows return to contact sport at 6 months with lower long-term recurrence risk. If he declines surgery, I would respect his autonomy but ensure he understands the recurrence risk and progressive bone loss that occurs with each dislocation.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Age under 20 + contact sport = 90% recurrence if conservative
Document axillary nerve function pre and post any intervention
MRI essential to assess labral injury, Hill-Sachs, bone loss
Evidence supports early stabilization in young athletic patients
Return to sport: 6 months post-Bankart repair minimum
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not documenting axillary nerve status
✗Not getting MRI to assess lesions
✗Not counseling about very high recurrence risk in this age group
✗Promising return to sport before 6 months
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if MRI shows 30% glenoid bone loss?"
"What is the glenoid track concept?"
"How long return to sport after Latarjet?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Missed Posterior Dislocation

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old man presents 3 weeks after a seizure with persistent shoulder pain. He was seen in ED on the day of seizure, had an AP X-ray 'reported as normal' and was discharged. He cannot externally rotate his shoulder. Examination shows the arm fixed in internal rotation. What is your assessment?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation is highly concerning for a missed posterior shoulder dislocation, which occurs in up to 50% of cases. The classic triad is present: post-seizure, fixed internal rotation, and inability to externally rotate. My immediate concern is that this is now a chronic locked posterior dislocation at 3 weeks. I would examine for the 'empty antecubital fossa' - the humeral head should not be palpable anteriorly. I would arrange urgent imaging: first, orthogonal X-rays including a true axillary lateral or Y-view (not just AP). I expect to see the 'lightbulb sign' on AP, with the head posterior to glenoid on axillary view. Then CT scan is essential to assess the size of the reverse Hill-Sachs (McLaughlin lesion), as this determines treatment. If the reverse Hill-Sachs is under 25%, I would attempt closed reduction under GA with good muscle relaxation. If 25-40%, open reduction with lesser tuberosity transfer (McLaughlin procedure) or allograft is needed. If over 40-50%, the patient may require arthroplasty. I would explain to him that this was unfortunately missed initially, and document my findings carefully.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Posterior dislocations missed 50% of time on AP X-ray alone
Triad: seizure/electrocution + fixed IR + cannot ER
ALWAYS get axillary view - never rely on AP alone
CT scan essential to assess reverse Hill-Sachs size
Treatment depends on defect size and chronicity
COMMON TRAPS
✗Accepting 'normal AP X-ray' without axillary view
✗Not getting CT to quantify reverse Hill-Sachs
✗Attempting closed reduction of chronic dislocation without planning
✗Not recognizing this may need more than closed reduction at 3 weeks
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the X-ray signs of posterior dislocation?"
"What is the McLaughlin procedure?"
"What percentage reverse Hill-Sachs needs arthroplasty?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Recurrent Instability with Bone Loss

EXAMINER

"A 28-year-old rugby player has had 5 anterior shoulder dislocations over 3 years and has apprehension with his arm in throwing position. He had an arthroscopic Bankart repair 2 years ago which 'worked for 6 months' before he started dislocating again. MRI shows attenuated anterior labrum. CT shows 28% glenoid bone loss. What surgical options would you discuss?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a complex revision instability case with significant bone loss - a patient where isolated Bankart repair has already failed and would likely fail again. The key issues are: (1) 28% glenoid bone loss exceeds the 25% threshold, meaning soft tissue repair alone has high failure rate; (2) previous Bankart has failed suggesting tissue quality is poor; (3) young high-demand rugby player. For surgical options, my primary recommendation would be a **Latarjet procedure**. The Latarjet addresses his problem through the 'triple effect': bone block increases the glenoid arc, the conjoined tendon provides dynamic sling effect in ABER position, and the capsule is repaired to the CA ligament stump. Expected recurrence with Latarjet is 3-5% compared to 30%+ for revision Bankart with this bone loss. I would counsel about Latarjet-specific complications: nerve injury (musculocutaneous, suprascapular), nonunion of coracoid (5-10%), hardware issues, and future arthritis. Alternative options include the Eden-Hybinette (iliac crest bone graft) which avoids harvesting the coracoid but has less evidence. I would discuss return to rugby at 6-9 months post-Latarjet with appropriate rehabilitation.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
28% glenoid bone loss = Latarjet indicated (threshold 25%)
Failed Bankart + bone loss = soft tissue repair will fail again
Latarjet triple effect: bone block, sling effect, capsular repair
Latarjet recurrence 3-5% vs revision Bankart 25-30%
Counsel about Latarjet complications particularly nerve injury
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending revision Bankart with this bone loss - will fail
✗Not quantifying bone loss with CT
✗Not addressing the failed previous surgery
✗Underestimating Latarjet complications
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Describe the Latarjet surgical technique"
"What is the glenoid track concept?"
"When would you consider Eden-Hybinette over Latarjet?"

MCQ Practice Points

Anatomy Question

Q: Which ligament is the primary restraint to anterior dislocation in the ABER position? A: Anterior band of the Inferior Glenohumeral Ligament (IGHL). The IGHL is taut in abduction and external rotation and is torn in anterior dislocation, leading to Bankart lesion.

Clinical Question

Q: What percentage of posterior shoulder dislocations are missed on initial presentation? A: Up to 50%. AP X-ray may appear normal. Key is to recognize clinical signs (arm fixed in IR, cannot ER) and obtain axillary lateral view. Lightbulb sign, rim sign, and lost half-moon are X-ray clues.

Recurrence Question

Q: What is the recurrence rate for first-time anterior dislocation in patients under 20 years treated conservatively? A: Up to 90%. Age is the strongest predictor of recurrence. This high rate supports early surgical stabilization in young athletes.

Bone Loss Question

Q: At what percentage of glenoid bone loss does arthroscopic Bankart repair have unacceptable failure rates? A: Over 25% (some say 20%). At this threshold, isolated Bankart repair fails in 67% of cases. Latarjet procedure is indicated for significant glenoid bone loss.

Nerve Injury Question

Q: Which nerve is most commonly injured in anterior shoulder dislocation, and how is it tested? A: Axillary nerve (up to 30%). Test deltoid power (abduction) and sensation over the regimental badge area (lateral deltoid). Document pre and post-reduction.

Lesion Question

Q: What is an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion? A: A Hill-Sachs defect that engages on the anterior glenoid rim during functional external rotation - the lesion is 'off-track' based on the glenoid track concept. Requires additional surgery (remplissage or bone grafting) beyond Bankart repair.

Australian Context

Epidemiology

  • High rate in AFL and rugby players
  • Peak incidence in 18-25 age group
  • Male predominance in sports injuries
  • Indigenous Australians higher contact sport participation

Healthcare Funding

  • Private health implications for young patients
  • Waiting lists for public surgery

Medicolegal Considerations

Key documentation: (1) Pre-reduction neurovascular exam (axillary nerve), (2) Consent for reduction including risks, (3) Post-reduction neurovascular exam, (4) Imaging before and after, (5) Counseling about recurrence risk and treatment options. Failure to obtain axillary view leading to missed posterior dislocation is a recognized litigation risk.

SHOULDER DISLOCATIONS

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Anatomy

  • •IGHL anterior band = primary restraint in ABER
  • •Labrum increases socket depth by 50%
  • •Axillary nerve = most at risk (30%)
  • •Regimental badge sensation = axillary nerve test

Classification

  • •Anterior: 95% - ABER mechanism, Bankart + Hill-Sachs
  • •Posterior: 3-4% - seizure/electrocution, lightbulb sign
  • •Inferior (luxatio erecta): rare, arm locked overhead
  • •ALWAYS get axillary view - posterior missed 50%

Associated Lesions

  • •Bankart: anterior labrum avulsion (67%)
  • •Hill-Sachs: posterolateral head impaction (40-90%)
  • •HAGL: humeral avulsion of GHL (missed on scope)
  • •Bone loss over 25% = cannot do Bankart alone

Recurrence by Age

  • •Under 20 years: 90% recurrence
  • •20-40 years: 40-60% recurrence
  • •Over 40 years: under 25% (but check cuff!)
  • •Early stabilization reduces recurrence in young

Surgical Options

  • •Bankart repair: standard, 10-15% recurrence
  • •Latarjet: bone loss over 25%, 3-5% recurrence
  • •Remplissage: engaging Hill-Sachs (off-track)
  • •Return to contact sport: 6 months minimum
Quick Stats
Reading Time122 min
🇦🇺

FRACS Guidelines

Australia & New Zealand
  • AOANJRR Shoulder Registry
  • MBS Shoulder Items
Related Topics

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures