Research

The Ultimate Guide to Writing and Publishing a Surgical Case Report

A step-by-step masterclass on getting your case report published. From selecting the right case and obtaining consent to navigating the CARE guidelines and submission process.

O
Orthovellum Team
6 January 2025
11 min read

Quick Summary

A step-by-step masterclass on getting your case report published. From selecting the right case and obtaining consent to navigating the CARE guidelines and submission process.

Visual Element: An infographic of the "Publication Pipeline": Case Identification -> Consent -> Lit Review -> Drafting (CARE) -> Submission -> Peer Review -> Publication.

Your First Step into Academia: The Gateway Drug of Orthopaedic Research

For many orthopaedic surgery trainees preparing for fellowship exams like the FRACS, FRCS, or ABOS, the humble case report is the gateway drug to academic publishing. It is a highly manageable project, requires absolutely zero grant funding, doesn't need ethical board (IRB) approval beyond patient consent, and—if you are disciplined—can be drafted in a single rigorous weekend.

However, the landscape of surgical education and publishing has shifted. With journal acceptance rates plummeting and editors suffering from profound "Case Report Fatigue," getting your manuscript accepted is harder than ever. You can no longer publish a standard open fracture simply because it looked dramatic in the trauma bay.

Beyond just padding your CV for fellowship applications, writing a high-quality case report forces you to dive deep into the literature regarding a specific pathology. When that rare bone tumor or complex instability pattern comes up in your oral exams, the depth of knowledge you gained from writing the report will pay massive dividends.

This comprehensive guide provides the strategic, step-by-step framework to turn an interesting patient encounter into a permanent PubMed citation.

Phase 1: Case Selection (The Ruthless "So What?" Test)

Before you type a single word or conduct a literature search, you must ask yourself the most critical question in academic publishing: Why does the orthopaedic community need to know about this?

High-impact journals reject up to 90% of case reports immediately upon submission because they are deemed "routine." Your job is to prove novelty.

Just because a surgical case was technically demanding for you doesn't mean it is novel for the specialty. A complex Letournel acetabular fracture that took you 8 hours to fix is an excellent learning case, but it isn't a case report unless you utilized a genuinely unprecedented surgical approach or encountered a never-before-described anatomical variant. Journals want to publish new knowledge, not surgical diaries.

The Three Categories of Truly Publishable Cases:

To pass the editorial filter, your case must fall squarely into one of these three buckets:

  1. The Black Swan (The True Rarity) This is a condition or presentation so exceptionally rare that most orthopaedic surgeons will never see it in their entire career.

    • Example: Primary Hydatid Cyst of the Talus mimicking a giant cell tumor.
    • Example: Bilateral simultaneous spontaneous quadriceps tendon ruptures in a healthy 20-year-old without systemic disease or steroid use.
  2. The Nightmare (The Diagnostic Pitfall or Catastrophe) These cases offer a profound, sobering safety lesson or highlight a critical "Near Miss." They change how surgeons practice by warning them of hidden dangers.

    • Example: Fatal massive venous air embolism during prone positioning for elective lumbar fusion.
    • Example: Compartment syndrome of the thigh following seemingly innocuous routine knee arthroscopy.
  3. The Novel Solution (The "MacGyver" Technique) A highly creative, improvised, or off-label use of orthopaedic hardware to solve a complex, unyielding problem where standard implants failed or were unavailable.

    • Example: Utilizing a contoured pediatric locking proximal femur plate for a complex midshaft clavicle fracture with severe comminution.
    • Example: 3D-printed custom titanium trabecular cones for massive contained metaphyseal defects in revision total elbow arthroplasty.

The Golden Rule: If your summary is "We fixed a comminuted hip fracture with a standard nail and it healed uneventfully," stop right now. Save your time.

Rule #1 of Medical Publishing: No Written Consent, No Paper.

You must obtain written, informed consent from the patient specifically for medical publication. A general hospital surgical consent form is entirely useless for this purpose.

  • The Correct Form: Always use the specific consent form provided by the journal you intend to target (e.g., the standard BMJ Case Reports Consent Form). If you haven't picked a journal yet, use your hospital's official media/publication consent form as a placeholder, but be prepared to get the journal's specific form signed later.
  • The Illusion of Anonymity: You must explain to the patient that while their name, date of birth, and MRN will be removed, total anonymity in the digital age is nearly impossible to guarantee.
  • Special Considerations for Orthopaedics: Unique tattoos visible in clinical photos, highly specific custom tumor prostheses, or incredibly rare mechanisms of injury (e.g., "injuries sustained from a highly publicized local shark attack") can inadvertently identify a patient.
  • Deceased Patients: Check your local jurisdictional laws immediately. In almost all cases, formal Next of Kin consent is legally required to publish details about a deceased patient.

The Social Media Danger

Do not post your "cool case" to Ortho Twitter/X or Instagram before it is published. Many journals utilize strict plagiarism software that will flag your own social media posts, leading to an automatic desktop rejection due to the case already being in the "public domain." Save the social media flex for after you have the DOI link.

Phase 3: The Write-Up (Mastering the CARE Guidelines)

The CARE (CAse REport) guidelines are the absolute industry standard for reporting clinical cases. Before drafting, download the CARE checklist and keep it on your desk. Editors will check your manuscript against it.

1. The Title (Your Billboard)

Make it exceptionally catchy, highly descriptive, and clinically relevant. It must contain the words "Case Report."

  • Boring: "A Case Report of Gout in the Knee."
  • Better: "The White Knee: Acute Tophaceous Gout Mimicking Septic Arthritis in a Young Athlete: A Case Report."
  • Best: "Catastrophic Failure of a Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty Presenting as an Expanding Pelvic Mass: A Case Report and Review of the Literature."

2. The Abstract (The Sales Pitch)

This is the only part of your paper the Editor-in-Chief will read before deciding whether to send it for peer review or reject it outright. Keep it strictly structured: Background, Case Presentation, and Conclusion. Hit the word count limit exactly.

3. The Introduction (The Hook)

Keep it brief and punchy—no more than 3 paragraphs.

  • Paragraph 1: What is the condition, and what is its standard epidemiology?
  • Paragraph 2: What is the accepted gold-standard treatment, and what are its known limitations?
  • Paragraph 3: Why is your specific case unique, and what exact gap in the literature does it fill?

4. Case Presentation (The Narrative Arc)

Write this chronologically, exactly as the patient experienced it. Be precise with orthopaedic terminology.

  • Patient & Demographics: "A 45-year-old right-hand-dominant carpenter..."
  • Mechanism & Complaint: "...presented to the trauma bay following a 3-meter fall from a ladder, complaining of isolated, severe right wrist pain."
  • Clinical Findings: Detail the exact physical exam (e.g., "obvious dinner-fork deformity, median nerve intact to light touch, 2+ radial pulse"). Include relevant labs (CRP, ESR, WCC for infections).
  • Imaging: Describe the initial radiographs concisely. "Initial orthogonal radiographs revealed a volarly displaced intra-articular distal radius fracture..."
  • Intervention: Describe the surgical setup, approach, and fixation strategy. Crucial: Mention the exact implants used generically (e.g., "volar locking plate") rather than by trade name unless the specific implant is the focus of the report.
  • Rehabilitation & Outcome: An orthopaedic case is useless without follow-up. Detail the post-op protocol (e.g., "placed in a sugar-tong splint, transitioned to cast at 2 weeks"). Provide clinical and radiographic outcomes at a minimum of 6 to 12 months. Reports with less than 3-6 months of follow-up are almost universally rejected in orthopaedics.

5. Discussion (The Clinical Analysis)

  • Do not rewrite Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics or Rockwood & Green. The editor already knows the basics.
  • Compare your specific findings to the existing literature. Use phrasing like: "To our knowledge, there are only 14 previously reported cases of [X] in the English literature..."
  • Provide a mechanism. Explain why the pathology happened or why your novel surgical technique worked biomechanically.
  • The Take-Home Message: End with a single, highly actionable bullet point or paragraph that a trainee can take away and use on their next shift.

The 'Mini-Review' Strategy

To dramatically increase your acceptance chances, don't just report your single case. Perform a systematic mini-review of all similar cases in the literature. Summarizing the 15 previous cases of a rare tumor, collating their treatments and outcomes into a clean table, and adding yours as the 16th transforms a simple narrative into a highly citable reference article.

Phase 4: Imaging, Visuals, and Formatting

Orthopaedics is a highly visual specialty. Your images will literally sell your paper. A fantastic case with blurry, uninterpretable X-rays will be rejected.

  • Radiographs (X-rays/CT/MRI):
    • Ensure absolute removal of all patient identifiers (Names, DOB, MRN, Hospital Name).
    • Use high-contrast, high-resolution exports (minimum 300 DPI, usually TIFF or high-quality JPEG).
    • Always use clean, professional arrows or asterisks to point directly at the subtle pathology. Don't make the reviewer hunt for the hairline fracture.
    • For complex trauma or tumors, include 3D CT reconstructions.
  • Clinical Photos:
    • Crop strictly to the anatomical area of interest.
    • Use a solid color (preferably black or surgical green) background if possible to remove distracting background clutter.
  • Intra-operative Photos:
    • Clean the bloody field before snapping the photo. A messy, blood-soaked incision looks deeply unprofessional and will get rejected.
    • Use proper lighting, retractors to clearly show the anatomy, and ensure the focal point is sharp.

Phase 5: Submission Strategy and Journal Selection

Not all journals are created equal. You need a targeted strategy based on the strength of your case.

Choosing Your Target Journal

  1. Top Tier (Impact Factor > 3.0): JBJS Case Connector, JAAOS Global Research & Reviews.
    • Target: Reserve these for true world-firsts, massive case series, or profound changes to established surgical paradigms.
  2. Mid Tier / Sub-Specialty: Trauma Case Reports, Arthroplasty Today, Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports (JOCR).
    • Target: Excellent for highly educational cases with good clinical photos and clear learning points.
  3. Open Access / Mega-Journals: BMJ Case Reports, International Journal of Surgery Case Reports (IJSCR), Cureus.
    • Target: These journals have higher acceptance rates and rapid review times, but they charge Article Processing Charges (APCs) ranging from 300to300 to 1500.
    • Pro-Tip: Before paying out of pocket, check if your university library or hospital has an institutional fellowship/waiver with BMJ Case Reports. Many do.

The Cover Letter (Your Elevator Pitch)

Do not just copy and paste your abstract. The cover letter is a personal note to the Editor-in-Chief. Keep it direct: "Dear Editor, We are submitting our manuscript titled [Title]. This case is highly relevant to your readership because it highlights a critical and easily missed diagnostic pitfall in pediatric elbow trauma that, if unrecognized, leads to devastating varus deformity. It strictly adheres to the CARE guidelines."

Phase 6: Surviving Peer Review and Handling Rejection

If you write enough case reports, you will be rejected. It is a fundamental part of the academic game. Do not take it personally.

  • The Desktop Reject: The editor rejected it within 48 hours without sending it to reviewers. This usually means you submitted to the wrong tier of journal, or your case wasn't novel enough. Action: Shrug it off, reformat the references for your backup journal, and submit elsewhere the same day.
  • Revise and Resubmit (Major or Minor): Congratulations! This is essentially an acceptance if you play your cards right.
  • Responding to Reviewers: You must address every single point raised by the reviewers, no matter how pedantic or frustrating.
    • Create a "Response to Reviewers" document.
    • Be unfailingly polite.
    • Reviewer 2: "The discussion regarding the biomechanics of the plate is far too long and speculative."
    • Your Response: "We thank the reviewer for this insightful feedback. We agree that the section was overly speculative. We have significantly condensed the biomechanical discussion and removed the speculative assertions (Page 6, Lines 12-18)."

Conclusion

Writing a high-quality surgical case report is far more than an exercise in CV building. It teaches you the strict discipline of academic formatting, hones your literature searching skills, and forces you to practice concise, impactful medical writing. These are exactly the skills required to synthesize information quickly during the high-pressure environment of orthopaedic fellowship exams.

Find that interesting patient on your next on-call shift, secure the consent form early, download the CARE guidelines, and start writing. Your first PubMed citation is waiting.

References and Suggested Reading

  1. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D; CARE Group. "The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2014 Jan;67(1):46-51.
  2. Rison RA. "A guide to writing case reports for the Journal of Medical Case Reports and BioMed Central Research Notes." J Med Case Rep. 2013 Nov 27;7:239.
  3. Pierson DJ. "How to write a case report." Respir Care. 2004 Oct;49(10):1186-94. (An absolute classic on the structure of medical writing).
  4. CARE Guidelines Official Website: care-statement.org - Ensure you download the official checklist prior to submission.

Found this helpful?

Share it with your colleagues

Discussion

The Ultimate Guide to Writing and Publishing a Surgical Case Report | OrthoVellum