Hip Dislocation After THR
CIM Case: Hip Dislocation After THR
Clinical Scenario
Patient: 72-year-old woman Presentation: Acute right hip pain and inability to move leg after bending to tie shoelaces, 6 weeks post-THR Relevant history: Posterior approach THR 6 weeks ago for primary OA, 28mm femoral head, uncomplicated surgery, first dislocation, had been compliant with precautions, lives with husband Examination findings:
- Hip held in flexion, adduction, and internal rotation (classic posterior dislocation position)
- Leg appears shortened compared to contralateral
- Unable to actively or passively range the hip
- Severe pain with any attempted movement
- Neurovascularly intact distally (palpable pulses, sensation intact, able to move toes)
- No wound complications visible
Investigations Provided
Laboratory Results
| Test | Result | Normal Range | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hb | 112 g/L | 120-150 g/L | ↓ Mild post-op anaemia |
| WCC | 8.5 ×10⁹/L | 4-11 ×10⁹/L | Normal |
| CRP | 45 mg/L | <5 mg/L | ↑ Expected post-op elevation |
| Creatinine | 72 μmol/L | 45-90 μmol/L | Normal |
Imaging
Image 1: AP Pelvis Radiograph
Radiological features:
- Right THR with femoral head dislocated posteriorly and superiorly
- Femoral head sitting above and posterior to acetabular component
- No periprosthetic fracture visible
- Acetabular cup appears retroverted (opening facing posteriorly)
- Estimated cup inclination appears steep (>50°)
- Left hip normal
Image 2: Post-reduction AP Pelvis and Lateral Hip
Post-reduction findings:
- Femoral head concentrically reduced within acetabular liner
- No new fracture
- Cup version assessment: appears retroverted on AP and lateral views
Questions & Model Answers
What is the diagnosis and mechanism?
What is your initial management?
The hip is successfully reduced. What is your subsequent management plan?
She dislocates again 3 months later. What are your options?
What is the role of CT in assessing component position?
How would you counsel this patient about revision surgery for recurrent instability?
Key Teaching Points
Pattern Recognition
This pattern suggests Posterior THR Dislocation:
- Hip held in flexion, adduction, internal rotation
- Leg shortened and internally rotated
- Mechanism: flexion + adduction + internal rotation combined (bending forward with knees together)
- Posterior approach has higher dislocation risk than anterior approach
Distinguish Anterior vs Posterior Dislocation:
| Feature | Posterior Dislocation | Anterior Dislocation |
|---|---|---|
| Position | Flexion, adduction, IR | Extension, abduction, ER |
| Mechanism | Bending + crossing legs | Hyperextension + ER |
| Approach risk | Posterior approach | Anterior approach |
| Frequency | More common | Less common |
Lewinnek Safe Zone:
| Parameter | Target | Safe Range |
|---|---|---|
| Cup inclination | 40° | 30-50° |
| Cup anteversion | 15° | 5-25° |
Note: Lewinnek safe zone has been questioned - many dislocations occur within these parameters. Combined anteversion (stem + cup) may be more important.
Critical Management Points
- Reduce urgently - within 6 hours ideally
- General anaesthesia preferred - adequate muscle relaxation
- Check stability under fluoro - document safe ROM
- First dislocation = conservative - bracing, precautions, physio
- Recurrent dislocation = surgery - dual mobility increasingly first-line
- CT for component position - assess version, especially if recurrent
Common Examiner Follow-ups
Q: "What positions should patients avoid after posterior approach THR?"
Avoid combined flexion + adduction + internal rotation:
- Flexion >90° - avoid low chairs, deep squatting
- Adduction across midline - pillow between legs when sleeping
- Crossing legs - keep legs apart
- Bending forward with knees together - use long-handled reaching aids
- Duration: typically 6-12 weeks, some surgeons for 3 months
Q: "What is dual mobility and how does it work?"
Dual mobility construct:
- Design: Small inner head articulating with a large outer head, which articulates with a metal shell
- Mechanism: Two articulations increase total arc of motion and "jump distance"
- Jump distance: Distance head must travel before dislocating (larger head = greater distance)
- Advantages: Reduces dislocation risk, lower constraint than constrained liner
- Drawbacks: Potential for intraprosthetic dislocation, polyethylene wear concerns (improved with modern PE)
Q: "What is a constrained liner and when would you use it?"
Constrained liner:
- Design: Polyethylene liner with a mechanical locking ring that captures the head
- Mechanism: Physical barrier prevents dislocation
- Indication: Recurrent instability, abductor deficiency, neuromuscular disorders
- Drawbacks:
- Higher forces transmitted to bone-implant interface
- Increased risk of loosening
- If constraint fails, dislocation can still occur
- Essentially "uses up" a surgical option
Q: "What are the risk factors for THR dislocation?"
| Category | Risk Factors |
|---|---|
| Patient | Female, advanced age, neuromuscular disease, cognitive impairment, prior hip surgery |
| Surgical | Posterior approach, inadequate soft tissue repair, component malposition |
| Implant | Small head size (<32mm), elevated rim liner not used |
| Soft tissue | Abductor deficiency, capsular damage |
Related Topics
- THR Surgical Approaches
- Dual Mobility Hip Arthroplasty
- Component Positioning in THR
- Lewinnek Safe Zone
- Revision Hip Arthroplasty