THR dislocationposterior dislocationdual mobilityconstrained linercomponent malpositionLewinnek safe zone
6:00
Start the timer to simulate exam conditions
CIM Case: Hip Dislocation After THR
Clinical Scenario
Patient: 72-year-old woman
Presentation: Acute right hip pain and inability to move leg after bending to tie shoelaces, 6 weeks post-THR
Relevant history: Posterior approach THR 6 weeks ago for primary OA, 28mm femoral head, uncomplicated surgery, first dislocation, had been compliant with precautions, lives with husband
Examination findings:
Hip held in flexion, adduction, and internal rotation (classic posterior dislocation position)
Leg appears shortened compared to contralateral
Unable to actively or passively range the hip
Severe pain with any attempted movement
Neurovascularly intact distally (palpable pulses, sensation intact, able to move toes)
No wound complications visible
Investigations Provided
Laboratory Results
Test
Result
Normal Range
Interpretation
Hb
112 g/L
120-150 g/L
↓ Mild post-op anaemia
WCC
8.5 ×10⁹/L
4-11 ×10⁹/L
Normal
CRP
45 mg/L
<5 mg/L
↑ Expected post-op elevation
Creatinine
72 μmol/L
45-90 μmol/L
Normal
Imaging
Image 1: AP Pelvis Radiograph
Radiological features:
Right THR with femoral head dislocated posteriorly and superiorly
Femoral head sitting above and posterior to acetabular component
No periprosthetic fracture visible
Acetabular cup appears retroverted (opening facing posteriorly)
Estimated cup inclination appears steep (>50°)
Left hip normal
Image 2: Post-reduction AP Pelvis and Lateral Hip
Post-reduction findings:
Femoral head concentrically reduced within acetabular liner
No new fracture
Cup version assessment: appears retroverted on AP and lateral views
Questions & Model Answers
Q1
What is the diagnosis and mechanism?
Q2
What is your initial management?
Q3
The hip is successfully reduced. What is your subsequent management plan?
Q4
She dislocates again 3 months later. What are your options?
Q5
What is the role of CT in assessing component position?
Q6
How would you counsel this patient about revision surgery for recurrent instability?
Posterior approach has higher dislocation risk than anterior approach
Distinguish Anterior vs Posterior Dislocation:
Feature
Posterior Dislocation
Anterior Dislocation
Position
Flexion, adduction, IR
Extension, abduction, ER
Mechanism
Bending + crossing legs
Hyperextension + ER
Approach risk
Posterior approach
Anterior approach
Frequency
More common
Less common
Lewinnek Safe Zone:
Parameter
Target
Safe Range
Cup inclination
40°
30-50°
Cup anteversion
15°
5-25°
Note: Lewinnek safe zone has been questioned - many dislocations occur within these parameters. Combined anteversion (stem + cup) may be more important.
Critical Management Points
Reduce urgently - within 6 hours ideally
General anaesthesia preferred - adequate muscle relaxation
Check stability under fluoro - document safe ROM
First dislocation = conservative - bracing, precautions, physio
Recurrent dislocation = surgery - dual mobility increasingly first-line
CT for component position - assess version, especially if recurrent
Common Examiner Follow-ups
Q: "What positions should patients avoid after posterior approach THR?"