Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • For Training Programs
  • Authors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Methodology
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Back to CIM Cases
MetabolicPaediatrics/Metabolic

X-Linked Hypophosphataemic Rickets

Metabolic
Intermediate
6 min
High Yield
hypophosphataemiaPHEX geneFGF23ricketsphosphate supplementationcalcitriolgenu varumrenal phosphate wastingX-linked dominant
6:00
Start the timer to simulate exam conditions

CIM Case: X-Linked Hypophosphataemic Rickets

Clinical Scenario

Patient: 14-month-old male Presentation: Bowed legs, delayed walking, stunted growth, family history of "bone problems" in mother and maternal grandmother Relevant history: Full-term delivery, normal birth, delayed motor milestones (not yet walking independently), no dietary deficiency suspected (breast-fed with adequate weaning), mother is short stature (150cm) with bow legs Examination findings:

  • Height: 3rd percentile (below expected for mid-parental height)
  • Weight: 25th percentile
  • Bilateral genu varum with intercondylar distance 4cm
  • Widened wrists (metaphyseal flaring)
  • Frontal bossing
  • Dental: Delayed eruption (no teeth at 14 months)
  • No muscle weakness (unlike nutritional rickets)
  • No hypotonia
  • Normal neurological examination
  • Mother has similar leg bowing and required childhood osteotomies

Investigations Provided

Laboratory Results

TestResultNormal RangeInterpretation
Serum Calcium2.35 mmol/L2.10-2.55Normal
Serum Phosphate0.65 mmol/L1.25-1.90LOW
Alkaline Phosphatase850 U/L150-400HIGH
PTH35 pg/mL15-65Normal
25-OH Vitamin D75 nmol/L50-250Normal
1,25-(OH)2 Vitamin D55 pmol/L45-185Normal (inappropriately normal)
Creatinine28 μmol/L20-40Normal

Urine Studies

TestResultNormalInterpretation
Urinary Calcium3.8 mmol/day<4.0Normal to slightly elevated
TmP/GFR0.5 mmol/L1.0-1.5LOW - Renal phosphate wasting
Fractional Excretion PO428%<15%HIGH - Phosphaturia

Imaging

Image 1: AP Radiographs of Knees and Wrists

Radiological features:

  • Bilateral genu varum (tibial bowing)
  • Metaphyseal widening and cupping at distal femur and proximal tibia
  • Fraying of metaphyseal margins
  • No periosteal reaction
  • Wrist: Widening of distal radial and ulnar physes
  • Rachitic rosary not prominent (unlike nutritional rickets)
  • No fractures or Looser zones

Image 2: Standing Full-Length Lower Limb Alignment

Findings:

  • Mechanical axis deviation: 25mm lateral (bilateral)
  • Anatomical tibiofemoral angle: 20° varus
  • Metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle: 15°
  • No angular deformity at ankle

Questions & Model Answers

Q1

Interpret the laboratory findings. What is the diagnosis and how do you differentiate from nutritional rickets?

Q2

Explain the genetics and pathophysiology of X-linked hypophosphataemic rickets.

Q3

What is the medical management of XLH and what are the treatment goals?

Q4

At what point would you consider surgical correction of the lower limb deformity, and what are the principles?

Q5

How do you differentiate the various types of rickets in a clinical scenario?

Q6

What is the prognosis for this child and what complications may develop?


Key Teaching Points

Pattern Recognition

This pattern suggests X-Linked Hypophosphataemic Rickets:

  • Isolated hypophosphataemia with normal calcium
  • Normal PTH (not secondary hyperparathyroidism)
  • Normal vitamin D levels
  • Renal phosphate wasting (high TmP/GFR)
  • Family history of short stature/bowing (especially maternal line)
  • Absence of muscle weakness

Critical Management Points

  1. Differentiate from nutritional rickets - XLH has normal calcium, normal PTH, no muscle weakness
  2. Treatment requires BOTH phosphate AND calcitriol - phosphate alone causes secondary hyperparathyroidism
  3. Burosumab (anti-FGF23) is now available and may be first-line
  4. Nephrocalcinosis is a treatment complication requiring monitoring
  5. Surgery should wait until rickets healed and metabolically controlled
  6. Dental surveillance is essential - abscesses occur in normal-looking teeth

Common Examiner Follow-ups

Q: "What would you do if this child develops tertiary hyperparathyroidism?"

This occurs when long-standing secondary hyperparathyroidism becomes autonomous:

  • PTH remains elevated despite normalised calcium
  • Causes hypercalcaemia
  • May develop parathyroid adenoma
  • Requires parathyroidectomy
  • Prevention: careful monitoring and calcitriol dose adjustment

Q: "The mother asks about having another child - what do you tell her?"

Genetic counselling:

  • XLH is X-linked dominant
  • If the mother is affected:
    • 50% of sons will be affected
    • 50% of daughters will be affected
  • Prenatal diagnosis is possible with known PHEX mutation
  • Severity can vary even within families
  • Early treatment improves outcomes

Q: "At age 4, the deformity is worsening despite treatment. What now?"

Reassess:

  1. Confirm compliance with medications
  2. Check serum phosphate, ALP, PTH
  3. Renal ultrasound for nephrocalcinosis
  4. Consider burosumab if on conventional therapy
  5. If metabolically controlled but still progressing:
    • Consider guided growth (8-plates) if mild
    • Osteotomy if severe
    • Ensure at least 6 months of optimised medical treatment first

Related Topics

  • Nutritional Rickets
  • Vitamin D-Dependent Rickets
  • Renal Osteodystrophy
  • Paediatric Lower Limb Deformity
  • Genu Varum/Valgum
  • Blount's Disease
  • Metabolic Bone Disease
Quick Stats
Category
Metabolic
DifficultyIntermediate
Time Allowed6 min
Reading Time38 min
Investigation Types
bloodsimagingurine
Exam Tips

Read the clinical scenario carefully

Structure your answers systematically

Consider differential diagnoses

Justify your investigation choices

Think about management priorities