OncologyPaediatric Bone Tumours

Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis - Eosinophilic Granuloma

Oncology
Intermediate
6 min
High Yield
LCHeosinophilic granulomaBirbeck granulesCD1aS100vertebra planapunched-out lesionskeletal surveydiabetes insipidus
6:00
Start the timer to simulate exam conditions

CIM Case: Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis - Eosinophilic Granuloma

Clinical Scenario

Patient: 7-year-old boy Presentation: Localised skull pain and tender swelling over the right parietal region for 3 weeks, worse at night, mild irritability Relevant history: Previously well, no weight loss, no polyuria/polydipsia, normal development, no family history of malignancy Examination findings:

  • 3cm tender, non-mobile swelling over right parietal bone
  • No overlying skin changes
  • No lymphadenopathy
  • No hepatosplenomegaly
  • No skin rash or petechiae
  • No exophthalmos
  • Neurologically intact
  • No other bony tenderness

Investigations Provided

Laboratory Results

TestResultNormal RangeInterpretation
Haemoglobin125 g/L115-145Normal
WCC8.2 x 10⁹/L5-13Normal
Platelets280 x 10⁹/L150-400Normal
ESR25 mm/hr0-10Mildly elevated
CRP8 mg/L<5Mildly elevated
LDH180 U/L120-300Normal
ALP220 U/L150-400Normal (child)
Albumin42 g/L35-50Normal
LFTsNormal-No liver involvement
Urine osmolality650 mOsm/kg500-800Normal (no DI)

Imaging

Image 1: Skull X-ray (AP and Lateral)

Radiological features:

  • Well-defined, punched-out lytic lesion in right parietal bone
  • Size approximately 3 x 2.5 cm
  • Geographic bone destruction
  • No sclerotic rim
  • "Bevelled edge" appearance (outer table more affected than inner)
  • No periosteal reaction
  • No soft tissue calcification
  • No other skull lesions visible

Image 2: CT Head with Bone Windows

CT findings:

  • Sharply marginated lytic lesion
  • Destruction of both inner and outer tables
  • Bevelled margins confirming asymmetric involvement
  • Soft tissue component extending into subgaleal space
  • No intracranial extension
  • No dural involvement

Image 3: Skeletal Survey

Findings:

  • No other bony lesions identified
  • Normal spine (no vertebra plana)
  • Normal pelvis and long bones
  • Unifocal disease confirmed

Questions & Model Answers

Q

What is the likely diagnosis and describe the spectrum of this disease?

Q

What investigations would you perform to stage this patient?

Q

What histological findings would confirm the diagnosis?

Q

How would you manage this patient with unifocal skull LCH?

Q

What if this patient had vertebral involvement with vertebra plana?

Q

What features would indicate multisystem disease and how would management change?


Key Teaching Points

Pattern Recognition

This pattern suggests Eosinophilic Granuloma (Unifocal LCH):

  • Child aged 5-15 years
  • Punched-out lytic lesion without sclerotic margin
  • Bevelled edge on skull (pathognomonic)
  • No periosteal reaction
  • Single lesion on skeletal survey
  • No systemic symptoms

Distinguish from Other Lesions:

FeatureLCHOsteomyelitisEwing Sarcoma
Age5-15 yearsAny10-20 years
MarginPunched-outIll-definedPermeative
Periosteal reactionMinimalAggressiveOnion-skin
Soft tissue massSmallAbscessLarge
Systemic symptomsRareFever, malaiseB symptoms

Critical Management Points

  1. Skeletal survey is ESSENTIAL - bone scan misses 30% of lesions
  2. Screen for diabetes insipidus - urine osmolality in all patients
  3. Unifocal lesions often self-resolve - especially after biopsy
  4. Intralesional steroids are first-line - for persistent lesions
  5. Vertebra plana reconstitutes - avoid surgery when possible
  6. CD1a + S100 positive - confirms diagnosis

Common Examiner Follow-ups

Q: "Why does bone scan miss LCH lesions?"

LCH lesions are often "cold" on bone scan because:

  • Rapid bone destruction outpaces osteoblastic response
  • Bone scan relies on osteoblastic activity for uptake
  • Skull lesions particularly prone to false negatives
  • Up to 30% of lesions missed on bone scan

Therefore, skeletal survey (plain X-rays) is the preferred staging modality.


Q: "What is the role of chemotherapy in LCH?"

IndicationAgents
Not indicatedUnifocal bone lesion
IndicatedMultifocal bone disease
IndicatedAny multisystem involvement
First-lineVinblastine + prednisolone x 12 months
SalvageCladribine, cytarabine

Q: "What are the late effects of LCH?"

Late EffectIncidenceManagement
Diabetes insipidus15-25%DDAVP lifelong
Growth hormone deficiency10%GH replacement
Orthopaedic sequelae20%Usually mild
Hearing loss10-15%If temporal bone involved
Neurodegenerative disease1-4%Cerebellar, rare

Q: "Can LCH recur?"

Disease TypeRecurrence RateNotes
Unifocal10-15%Usually another bone lesion
Multifocal30-40%May need prolonged therapy
Multisystem50-60%May need salvage chemotherapy

Recurrence is most common within 2 years of diagnosis. Follow-up should continue for at least 5 years.


  • Bone Tumours in Children
  • Paediatric Spine Tumours
  • Vertebra Plana Differential
  • Skeletal Survey Indications
  • Ewing Sarcoma
  • Osteomyelitis