Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • For Training Programs
  • Authors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Methodology
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Back to CIM Cases
ArthroplastyArthroplasty Complications

Metal-on-Metal Hip Failure

Arthroplasty
Intermediate
6 min
High Yield
metal-on-metalARMDpseudotumourcobalt chromiumALVALMARS MRIedge loading
6:00
Start the timer to simulate exam conditions

CIM Case: Metal-on-Metal Hip Failure

Clinical Scenario

Patient: 58-year-old woman Presentation: Right hip and groin pain 7 years after metal-on-metal THR, worsening over 6 months, difficulty walking and ascending stairs Relevant history: MoM THR in 2017 for hip dysplasia (36mm head), no prior hip surgery, under annual surveillance, asymptomatic until recently, non-smoker, no other joint replacements Examination findings:

  • Antalgic gait
  • Tender over greater trochanter and groin
  • Range of motion limited: flexion 90° (painful), IR 10°, ER 30°
  • Positive anterior impingement sign
  • Mild Trendelenburg gait (subtle abductor weakness)
  • Well-healed lateral wound
  • No distal neurovascular deficit
  • No palpable lymphadenopathy
  • Cardiovascular examination normal

Investigations Provided

Laboratory Results

TestResultNormal RangeInterpretation
Cobalt12 ppb<7 ppb↑ Elevated (concerning)
Chromium9 ppb<7 ppb↑ Elevated
Hb125 g/L120-150 g/LNormal
WCC7.2 ×10⁹/L4-11 ×10⁹/LNormal
CRP5 mg/L<5 mg/LNormal
ESR12 mm/hr<20 mm/hrNormal
Creatinine68 μmol/L45-90 μmol/LNormal (renal function)
LFTsNormal-Normal (hepatic function)

Imaging

Image 1: AP Pelvis and Lateral Hip Radiograph

Radiological features:

  • Large head metal-on-metal THR in situ (36mm)
  • Cup inclination 55° (steep - outside safe zone of 35-45°)
  • Cup anteversion appears normal
  • No obvious osteolysis on plain film
  • Stem appears well-fixed
  • No loosening features

Image 2: MARS MRI (Metal Artifact Reduction Sequence)

MRI findings:

  • Large fluid collection posterior to hip joint (5cm pseudotumour)
  • Significant soft tissue oedema in periarticular region
  • Gluteal muscle atrophy with fatty infiltration
  • No definite abductor tendon tear
  • Marked inflammatory changes around implant
  • Features consistent with ARMD (Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris)

Questions & Model Answers

Q1

What is the diagnosis and what investigations would you perform?

Q2

How do you risk-stratify MoM patients and what surveillance is recommended?

Q3

What are the risk factors for MoM failure and the pathophysiology of ARMD?

Q4

What are the local and systemic effects of metal poisoning?

Q5

The MRI shows pseudotumour. What is your management plan?

Q6

What are the expected outcomes and how do you counsel this patient?


Key Teaching Points

Pattern Recognition

This pattern suggests MoM Failure (ARMD):

  • Patient with MoM bearing and new/progressive hip symptoms
  • Elevated metal ion levels (>7 ppb cobalt or chromium)
  • MARS MRI showing pseudotumour or soft tissue destruction
  • Risk factors: female, steep cup (>50°), larger head size

ARMD vs Periprosthetic Joint Infection:

FeatureARMDInfection
CRP/ESRUsually normalElevated
AspirateMetallic debris, lymphocytesElevated WCC, positive culture
HistologyALVAL (lymphocyte-dominated)Neutrophil infiltration
OnsetGradual (years)May be acute or chronic

Critical Management Points

  1. All MoM patients need lifelong surveillance - annual clinical review and metal ion testing
  2. Metal ions >7 ppb = concerning - warrant cross-sectional imaging
  3. Edge loading is key mechanism - cup inclination >50° dramatically increases wear
  4. MARS MRI is investigation of choice - detects pseudotumour and soft tissue damage
  5. Early revision = better outcomes - before extensive tissue destruction
  6. Never use MoM at revision - change to ceramic-on-polyethylene or ceramic-on-ceramic

Common Examiner Follow-ups

Q: "What is ARMD and ALVAL?"

TermDefinition
ARMDAdverse Reaction to Metal Debris - umbrella term for all local adverse reactions to MoM debris (pseudotumour, necrosis, osteolysis)
ALVALAseptic Lymphocyte-dominated Vasculitis-Associated Lesion - specific histological pattern with perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate and tissue necrosis

Key difference: ARMD is clinical/radiological diagnosis; ALVAL is histological diagnosis.

ALVAL represents a type IV hypersensitivity reaction (delayed cell-mediated) to metal ions, unlike polyethylene wear which causes macrophage-dominated osteolysis.


Q: "What is edge loading and why does it matter?"

Edge loading occurs when:

  • Head articulates at rim of cup rather than centrally
  • Caused by: steep cup inclination (>50°), inadequate cup coverage, impingement

Consequences:

  • Friction and wear massively increased (100-1000×)
  • Rapid metal debris generation
  • Accelerated ARMD development

Prevention: Cup inclination 35-45° ("safe zone"), adequate anteversion (15-25°).


Q: "What bearing surface would you use at revision?"

ScenarioRecommended Bearing
Standard revisionCeramic-on-XLPE
Young, active patientCeramic-on-ceramic
Abductor deficiencyDual mobility (stability)
Major bone lossCeramic-on-XLPE with reconstruction

Never use metal-on-metal again. The offending bearing must be completely removed.


Q: "What is the DePuy ASR recall and why was it important?"

The DePuy ASR (Articular Surface Replacement) was recalled in 2010:

  • Hip resurfacing and MoM THR system
  • Unacceptably high revision rates (5-year: 12-13%)
  • Design issues causing edge loading
  • Widespread ARMD

Implications:

  • Led to increased surveillance of all MoM hips
  • Established metal ion thresholds (>7 ppb)
  • Demonstrated importance of arthroplasty registries (AOANJRR)
  • Litigation and regulatory changes

Related Topics

  • AOANJRR Hip Registry Data
  • Bearing Surfaces in Arthroplasty
  • Metal Hypersensitivity
  • Revision Hip Arthroplasty
  • Pseudotumour of Hip
  • Hip Resurfacing
Quick Stats
Category
Arthroplasty
DifficultyIntermediate
Time Allowed6 min
Reading Time33 min
Investigation Types
bloodsimaging
Exam Tips

Read the clinical scenario carefully

Structure your answers systematically

Consider differential diagnoses

Justify your investigation choices

Think about management priorities