Spinal Metastasis
CIM Case: Spinal Metastasis
Clinical Scenario
Patient: 78-year-old female Presentation: 15-year history of chronic mechanical back pain, 3-month history of new-onset right thigh pain radiating to knee, associated with new-onset difficulty walking and progressive weakness, unintentional 8kg weight loss Relevant history: No known prior malignancy, 30-pack-year smoking history (ceased 10 years ago), no previous spinal surgery Examination findings:
- Thin, cachectic appearance
- Point tenderness L2-L3 region
- Decreased ROM lumbar spine due to pain
- Right hip flexion and knee extension weakness (4/5)
- Left lower limb normal power
- Absent right knee jerk, left normal
- Sensation intact bilateral
- No bladder or bowel dysfunction
- Rectal examination: normal tone
Investigations Provided
Laboratory Results
| Test | Result | Normal Range | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haemoglobin | 98 g/L | 120-160 | Anaemia of chronic disease |
| WCC | 8.2 × 10⁹/L | 4-11 | Normal |
| Platelets | 345 × 10⁹/L | 150-400 | Normal |
| ESR | 78 mm/hr | 0-20 | Elevated - malignancy/inflammation |
| CRP | 45 mg/L | <5 | Elevated |
| Sodium | 141 mmol/L | 135-145 | Normal |
| Potassium | 4.2 mmol/L | 3.5-5.0 | Normal |
| Creatinine | 95 μmol/L | 60-110 | Normal |
| Calcium (corrected) | 2.85 mmol/L | 2.15-2.55 | Hypercalcaemia |
| Albumin | 28 g/L | 35-50 | Low (malnutrition/chronic disease) |
| ALP | 245 U/L | 30-120 | Elevated - bone/liver |
| LDH | 380 U/L | 120-250 | Elevated |
| PSA | N/A | - | Not applicable (female) |
| CA 15-3 | 145 U/mL | <30 | Elevated (breast marker) |
| CEA | 8.5 ng/mL | <5 | Mildly elevated |
| Protein electrophoresis | No paraprotein | - | Myeloma excluded |
Imaging
Image 1: Plain Radiograph Lumbar Spine - AP and Lateral
Radiological features:
- Collapse of L2 vertebral body (50% height loss)
- Loss of left pedicle "winking owl" sign
- Soft tissue mass extending into left paraspinal region
- Osteopaenic appearance generally
Image 2: MRI Whole Spine with Gadolinium
MRI findings:
- L2 pathological fracture with complete replacement of marrow signal (T1 low, T2 heterogeneous, enhances with Gd)
- Epidural soft tissue extension causing moderate thecal sac compression
- Cord terminates at L1 - no cord signal change
- Additional lesions at T8, T11 (marrow replacement, no collapse)
- No leptomeningeal disease
Image 3: CT Chest/Abdomen/Pelvis
CT staging findings:
- 2.5cm spiculated left upper lobe mass
- Mediastinal lymphadenopathy
- Multiple hepatic lesions (metastases)
- Lytic lesions bilateral iliac bones
- No pelvic visceral lesion
Questions & Model Answers
What is your differential diagnosis and what investigations would you order to identify the primary tumour?
How do you assess prognosis in metastatic spinal disease? What scoring systems are used?
What is the role of biopsy? How would you obtain tissue for diagnosis?
What are the treatment options for this patient? Discuss the role of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy.
The patient develops acute worsening of leg weakness (now 2/5 bilaterally). What is your management?
What factors predict neurological recovery after surgery for MSCC? How would you counsel this patient's family?
Key Teaching Points
Pattern Recognition
This pattern suggests Metastatic Spinal Disease:
- Older patient with constitutional symptoms (weight loss)
- New or changed back pain pattern
- Radicular symptoms (L3 distribution = thigh pain)
- Risk factors (smoking for lung, female for breast)
- Laboratory abnormalities (hypercalcaemia, elevated ALP, anaemia)
Comparison - Primary vs Metastatic Spinal Tumour:
| Feature | Primary Tumour | Metastatic |
|---|---|---|
| Age | Often younger | Usually >50 |
| History of cancer | No | Often yes |
| Number of lesions | Usually single | Often multiple |
| Systemic symptoms | Less common | Common |
| Visceral disease | No | Often present |
| Treatment intent | Often curative | Usually palliative |
Critical Management Points
- Identify the primary - CT CAP, tumour markers, protein electrophoresis
- Assess prognosis - Tokuhashi, Tomita scores guide treatment intensity
- Assess stability - SINS score determines need for stabilisation
- Biopsy before treatment - unless known primary with classic pattern
- MDT essential - spine surgeon, radiation oncology, medical oncology
- MSCC is emergency - dexamethasone, urgent MRI, consider surgery
Common Examiner Follow-ups
Q: "What is the difference between Tokuhashi and Tomita scores?"
| Aspect | Tokuhashi | Tomita |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Survival prediction | Treatment strategy |
| Factors | 6 parameters | 3 parameters |
| Primary | Specific types listed | Grouped by growth rate |
| Output | Predicted survival | Treatment recommendation |
| Use | Deciding treatment intensity | Surgical planning |
Q: "What is 'separation surgery'?"
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Goal | Create 2-3mm gap between tumour and spinal cord |
| Technique | Posterior decompression, epidural tumour removal |
| Purpose | Allow high-dose SBRT without cord injury |
| Indication | Radioresistant tumours (RCC, melanoma, lung) |
| Outcome | Better local control than RT alone |
Q: "When would you consider en bloc resection for spinal metastasis?"
| Criterion | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Solitary metastasis | Only spinal lesion |
| No visceral disease | Or completely resected |
| Good prognosis | Tokuhashi ≥9, life expectancy >12 months |
| Radioresistant primary | RCC, thyroid, where RT less effective |
| Technically feasible | Contained lesion, experienced team |
En bloc is rarely performed - most patients have disseminated disease.
Related Topics
- Pathological Fractures
- Bone Metastases
- Myeloma and Spine
- Primary Spinal Tumours
- Spinal Cord Compression
- Tokuhashi and Tomita Scoring