Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Back to ISAWE Scenarios
Contents
0%
arthroplasty

Ceramic Head Fracture in THA

advanced
6 min
22 marks
5 questions
Clinical Scenario
A 52-year-old man presents with sudden onset severe hip pain after feeling a "crack" while rising from a chair. He had a ceramic-on-ceramic THA 8 years ago for avascular necrosis. He reports immediate inability to weight bear and describes a grinding sensation with any attempted movement. On examination, the hip is held in flexion and any passive motion elicits severe pain with audible crepitus.
AP radiograph showing THA with fragmented ceramic femoral head. Multiple ceramic fragments visible within the joint. Cup appears well-fixed. Significant periarticular debris pattern.
Open Full Size

AP radiograph showing THA with fragmented ceramic femoral head. Multiple ceramic fragments visible within the joint. Cup appears well-fixed. Significant periarticular debris pattern.

Image source: Open Access medical literature (NIH/PubMed Central) • CC-BY License

Questions

Question 1 (4 marks)

What is the likely diagnosis and what are the risk factors for this complication?

Question 2 (4 marks)

What imaging would you request and what would you look for?

Question 3 (5 marks)

What are the surgical management principles for ceramic head fracture?

Question 4 (4 marks)

What complications can occur if ceramic fragments are retained?

Question 5 (5 marks)

What would you counsel the patient regarding bearing surface selection for revision and expected outcomes?

Exam Day Cheat Sheet

Must Mention

  • •Ceramic fracture is a SURGICAL EMERGENCY
  • •BIOLOX delta fracture risk: 0.01-0.02% (lower than 3rd gen)
  • •MUST remove ALL ceramic fragments - third-body wear devastating
  • •NEVER metal head if ceramic debris may remain
  • •Taper assessment: damaged taper = stem revision or titanium sleeve
  • •Ceramic-on-ceramic preferred for revision

Common Pitfalls

  • •Metal head with retained ceramic
  • •Incomplete debridement
  • •Not checking taper damage
  • •Delayed surgery
  • •Inadequate exposure (no ETO)
  • •Not using imaging to confirm debris removal
Scenario Info
Answers Revealed0/5
Difficulty
advanced
Time Allowed6 min
Total Marks22
Questions5