Brachialis split Β· Radial nerve ~14cm from the lateral epicondyle Β· Distal-third carries the highest nerve risk
- The internervous plane is between biceps (musculocutaneous nerve) and brachialis β but brachialis has DUAL innervation (musculocutaneous medially, radial laterally), so it is split longitudinally in its midline.
- The radial nerve crosses the posterior humerus to reach a point a mean 14.2cm proximal to the lateral epicondyle (Gerwin 1996) β it is the PRIMARY structure at risk.
- The Holstein-Lewis fracture (distal-third spiral) is the classic pattern for radial nerve palsy; distal-third fractures carry the highest odds of nerve injury (OR 6.3 versus proximal β Entezari 2021).
- Use SUBPERIOSTEAL dissection only β never dissect posteriorly around the spiral groove, where the nerve is tethered to bone via the lateral intermuscular septum.
- An immediate post-operative (secondary) palsy with intact pre-operative function raises concern for iatrogenic injury β many surgeons re-explore early, though most secondary palsies still recover spontaneously.
- A primary fracture palsy (present at injury) is observed first β about 71 percent recover spontaneously with conservative care (Shao 2005).
When & Why
What it exposes. The anterior (Henry) approach gives direct access to the middle and distal third of the humeral shaft for ORIF of fractures, nonunion repair and tumour excision. First described by Henry in 1945, it is the most commonly used corridor for humeral shaft fractures needing fixation. Why anterior (and not posterior). Supine positioning is familiar, anaesthesia-friendly and allows simultaneous procedures in the polytrauma patient; the brachialis-splitting interval spares the triceps and the extensor mechanism; and the plate sits anterolaterally on the tension side (optimal biomechanics). The posterior approach is reserved for a mid-shaft fracture at the spiral groove where the radial nerve must be directly visualised and protected, or for nerve exploration β it brings the nerve into the field but needs prone or lateral positioning and carries extensor-mechanism morbidity. Position & landmarks. Supine, arm on a radiolucent side table, shoulder at the table edge for circumferential access; no tourniquet (a pneumatic tourniquet risks brachial plexus compression). Fluoroscopy (C-arm) is essential. The incision runs along the lateral border of biceps, from 2 to 3cm distal to the anterior axillary fold (coracoid level) to 5cm proximal to the antecubital crease (15 to 20cm). Do not extend proximal to the coracoid (axillary nerve risk) or distally across the elbow crease (lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury, unsightly scar). When to operate. Functional bracing remains first-line for closed, isolated fractures with acceptable alignment, but several situations demand fixation.
- Detail
- Open fracture, vascular injury requiring repair (brachial artery, 2-3 percent of shaft fractures), polytrauma, bilateral shaft fractures, floating elbow, pathological fracture (metastases with more than 50 percent cortical destruction)
- Management
- ORIF via anterior approach (or alternative as dictated by fracture/nerve status)
- Detail
- Unacceptable alignment (more than 20 degrees varus/valgus, more than 30 degrees AP angulation, more than 3cm shortening), radial nerve palsy appearing with manipulation (suggests entrapment), progressive displacement on serial films, segmental fracture, patient factors (obesity, non-compliance)
- Management
- ORIF versus functional bracing
- Detail
- Closed, isolated fracture with acceptable alignment (under 20 degrees varus/valgus, under 30 degrees AP, under 3cm shortening) and intact nerve function
- Management
- Sarmiento functional bracing β high union, about 2 percent nonunion in closed fractures (Sarmiento 2000)
Approach selection. The fracture level and the radial nerve status drive the choice between anterior and posterior.
- Anterior (Henry)
- Middle/distal third shaft (below deltoid insertion)
- Posterior
- Mid-shaft at the spiral groove level
- Preferred
- Depends on fracture level
- Anterior (Henry)
- NOT routinely visualised β lies outside the field
- Posterior
- DIRECTLY visualised in the triceps-splitting field
- Preferred
- Posterior (direct visualisation)
- Anterior (Henry)
- About 4-6 percent after fixation; nerve not directly seen (Entezari 2021)
- Posterior
- Lower when the nerve is directly visualised and protected
- Preferred
- Posterior (when the nerve must be controlled)
- Anterior (Henry)
- Supine (familiar, polytrauma-friendly)
- Posterior
- Prone or lateral decubitus (difficult for polytrauma)
- Preferred
- Anterior (supine is easier)
- Anterior (Henry)
- Brachialis splitting (minimal denervation, spares the extensor mechanism)
- Posterior
- Triceps splitting or TRAP (extensor-mechanism morbidity; TRAP preserves the insertion)
- Preferred
- Anterior (spares triceps)
- Anterior (Henry)
- Anterolateral (tension side β optimal)
- Posterior
- Posterior (compression side β suboptimal)
- Preferred
- Anterior (better biomechanics)
The Exposure
Work down through the layers along the lateral border of biceps, retract biceps medially to carry the neurovascular bundle out of the field, then split the dual-innervated brachialis in its midline and expose the shaft subperiosteally β protecting the radial nerve at every step.

Exposure sequence
- Supine on the table, arm on a radiolucent side table, shoulder at the table edge so the arm can be moved for circumferential access and fluoroscopy.
- No tourniquet β a pneumatic tourniquet on the proximal arm risks brachial plexus compression.
- Fluoroscopy (C-arm) available throughout; general or regional anaesthesia (interscalene block gives 12 to 18 hours of analgesia).
- Incise along the lateral border of biceps, from 2 to 3cm distal to the anterior axillary fold (coracoid level) to 5cm proximal to the antecubital crease β typically 15 to 20cm.
- Landmarks: coracoid process proximally, the easily palpable lateral border of biceps (elbow flexed) in the mid-arm, and the biceps tendon distally.
- Do not extend proximal to the coracoid (axillary nerve) or across the elbow crease (lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, unsightly scar).
- Incise skin and subcutaneous tissue; identify and protect the cephalic vein (deltopectoral groove proximally, continuing distally in the lateral subcutaneous plane) and ligate small perforators.
- Open the deep fascia along the lateral border of biceps longitudinally.
- Confirm the interval: biceps medially is soft and mobile; brachialis laterally is firm, covering the anterior humerus.
- Retract the biceps belly medially β this sweeps the brachial artery and median nerve medially, away from the surgical field.
- The brachialis is now exposed covering the anterior humerus, from the deltoid insertion to the coronoid process.
- Brachialis has dual innervation: medial part from the musculocutaneous nerve, lateral part from the radial nerve.
- Split it longitudinally, in the line of its fibres (parallel to the humerus) at its midline β the internervous plane within the muscle β separating the musculocutaneous-innervated medial fibres from the radial-innervated lateral fibres.
- Extend the split proximally and distally to expose the required length; never split transversely (violates fibres and innervation).
- With a Cobb elevator, elevate brachialis subperiosteally off the humerus (volar, medial and lateral surfaces) and expose the fracture proximal-to-distal.
- NEVER dissect posteriorly around the spiral groove β the radial nerve is adherent to bone there via the lateral intermuscular septum.
- For distal-third/Holstein-Lewis patterns or revision surgery, identify the radial nerve at the lateral intermuscular septum as a cord-like structure about 4 to 5mm across crossing the spiral groove, and protect it with a vessel loop β before any fracture manipulation.
- Routine nerve identification is NOT recommended for a standard mid-shaft fracture (it adds dissection and risk); reserve it for high-risk patterns.
The radial nerve crosses the posterior humerus to a mean point 14.2cm proximal to the lateral epicondyle (Gerwin 1996) and is tethered to bone at the lateral intermuscular septum. Keep all dissection strictly subperiosteal, work proximal-to-distal so you encounter the nerve predictably, and never dissect circumferentially around the posterolateral humerus. For a distal-third spiral (Holstein-Lewis) pattern, identify and protect the nerve at the lateral intermuscular septum before you touch the fracture β distal-third fractures carry the highest nerve-injury odds (OR 6.3 versus proximal β Entezari 2021).
The anterior approach is best for middle and distal-third shaft fractures. For a proximal-third fracture (above the deltoid insertion) use the deltopectoral approach, and for a fracture at or around the spiral groove where the nerve must be controlled, many surgeons prefer the posterior approach, which visualises the radial nerve directly.
Dangers & Extensions
Structures at risk, by layer
- Structure at risk
- Radial nerve at the spiral groove and lateral intermuscular septum (tethered, mean 14.2cm proximal to the lateral epicondyle)
- Protection
- Subperiosteal dissection only; proximal-to-distal exposure; identify at the lateral septum for distal-third spiral patterns
- Structure at risk
- Brachial artery with the median nerve (artery injured in 2-3 percent of shaft fractures)
- Protection
- Retract biceps medially as a unit; avoid dissection medial to biceps
- Structure at risk
- Lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABC) emerging lateral to the biceps tendon
- Protection
- Stay 5cm proximal to the elbow crease; avoid excessive distal dissection
- Structure at risk
- Nonunion (5-8 percent), infection (2-3 percent), shoulder stiffness (10-15 percent)
- Protection
- 6 to 8 cortices each side; limited periosteal stripping; early ROM
Intra-operative nerve injury (secondary/iatrogenic, about 4-6 percent). Mechanisms include excessive lateral retraction or traction during reduction, subperiosteal dissection straying around the tethered posterolateral humerus, drill or screw penetration of the far cortex, and entrapment beneath the plate or by a suture. Prevention rests on subperiosteal dissection only, proximal-to-distal exposure, and identifying the nerve at the lateral intermuscular septum for Holstein-Lewis patterns before reduction. Recognise it intra-operatively as loss of wrist and finger extension, or post-operatively as a wrist drop with weak EPL, EDC, EIP, APL and EPB while elbow extension and dorsal web-space sensation are preserved. Post-operative nerve palsy β make the critical distinction. A secondary palsy with intact pre-operative function raises concern for iatrogenic injury (traction, suture or plate entrapment, thermal injury). If the nerve was directly handled, lay at the fracture site, or its integrity is in doubt, early re-exploration is reasonable β identify it at the lateral intermuscular septum and perform neurolysis if in continuity, or primary repair or graft if lacerated. Most secondary palsies are neurapraxic and recover, so observation with nerve studies is also defensible when the nerve was not handled. A primary fracture palsy (present at injury, unchanged post-operatively) is observed: about 71 percent recover spontaneously (Shao 2005), nerve studies are obtained if there is no recovery by around 9 weeks (Entezari 2021), and exploration is considered at 4 to 6 months. If no recovery occurs, tendon transfers follow at around 9 to 12 months (PT to ECRB for wrist extension; FCR or FDS to EDC for finger extension; PL to a rerouted EPL for thumb extension). Extensile options. Extend proximally along the deltopectoral interval for proximal-third access (above the deltoid insertion the deltopectoral approach is preferred). Extend distally toward the elbow, staying clear of the crease. When a mid-shaft fracture at the spiral groove demands direct nerve visualisation, switch to the posterior approach β the modified exposure of Gerwin reflects both triceps heads medially after distal nerve identification and exposes a mean 26.2cm of diaphysis (versus 15.4cm for a standard triceps-splitting approach). Closure. Brachialis reapproximation with interrupted absorbable sutures is optional (the muscle heals spontaneously). Close the deep fascia and subcutaneous layer with absorbable sutures and the skin with a running subcuticular or interrupted suture. Apply a coaptation splint for 7 to 10 days, then a sling; wound check at 1 to 2 weeks, early shoulder and elbow pendulum/passive ROM at 2 weeks, active ROM at 6 weeks, and radiographic follow-up at 2, 6 and 12 weeks.
Procedures Through This Approach
- ORIF of middle and distal-third shaft fractures β the principal operation. Reduce with direct manipulation, longitudinal traction and rotation control, holding fragments with pointed or Weber clamps and verifying with fluoroscopy.
- Plate fixation (gold standard). A 4.5mm narrow LCP or LC-DCP is placed on the anterolateral humerus (the tension side) with 6 to 8 cortices proximal and distal (AO principles). Use compression or lag-through-plate screws for simple transverse or short-oblique patterns; locking screws for osteoporotic, comminuted or metaphyseal extension; and bridge plating for comminuted fractures (span the comminution, do not reconstruct every fragment).
- Nonunion and malunion β revision ORIF with bone grafting (iliac crest autograft), a larger plate, and smoking cessation; BMP-2 may be considered for high-risk atrophic nonunion.
- Pathological fracture β prophylactic fixation for metastatic lesions.
- Polytrauma β early stabilisation in the multiply-injured patient.
- Intramedullary nailing retains a role in segmental, pathological and osteoporotic fractures, but pooled randomised data favour plating (Bhandari 2006).
The Bhandari 2006 meta-analysis (3 RCTs, 155 patients) found plate fixation significantly lowered reoperation (RR 0.26, 95 percent CI 0.007 to 0.9, p=0.03 β about a 74 percent relative reduction, one reoperation prevented per 10 patients plated) and shoulder problems (RR 0.10, 95 percent CI 0.03 to 0.4, p=0.002), reflecting the rotator-cuff/impingement morbidity of antegrade nailing. The authors noted the cumulative evidence remained inconclusive and called for a larger trial, but plating is the usual first-line for diaphyseal humeral fractures.
Viva & Exam Focus
HUMERUSHUMERUS β anterior approach key steps
HOLSTEINHOLSTEIN β Holstein-Lewis fracture management
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
βA 45-year-old man sustains a closed mid-shaft humerus fracture after a fall β a transverse fracture at the junction of the middle and distal third with 15 degrees varus, 20 degrees anterior angulation and 1cm shortening, and an intact radial nerve. What are the indications for operative versus non-operative management, and how would you manage him?β
βA 32-year-old woman has a distal-third spiral humeral shaft fracture (Holstein-Lewis pattern) after a road crash, with intact radial nerve function and 25 degrees varus angulation. You plan ORIF via the anterior approach. Describe your strategy to protect the radial nerve, and quantify the nerve-injury risk.β
βA 50-year-old man has a mid-shaft humerus fracture at the level of the spiral groove with 30 degrees anterior angulation and an intact radial nerve, for which you plan operative fixation. Compare the anterior and posterior approaches for this fracture β which would you choose and why?β
Essential anatomy
- Internervous plane: between biceps (musculocutaneous nerve) medially and brachialis β which has dual innervation (musculocutaneous medially, radial laterally) β requiring a LONGITUDINAL brachialis split in the midline
- Radial nerve course: posteromedial proximally, then posterior across the spiral groove, then lateral distally where it pierces the lateral intermuscular septum
- Nerve crossing point: a mean 14.2cm (SD 0.6) proximal to the lateral epicondyle (Gerwin 1996, n=10) β the key reference for safe exposure
- Nerve adherence: relatively tethered to the posterolateral humerus at the lateral intermuscular septum and cannot be easily mobilised
- Holstein-Lewis fracture: distal-third spiral near the nerve crossing β the classic pattern for radial nerve palsy; distal-third fractures carry the highest nerve-injury odds (OR 6.3 versus proximal β Entezari 2021)
Surgical technique pearls
- Positioning: SUPINE, arm on a radiolucent side table, shoulder at the table edge, NO tourniquet (brachial plexus compression risk)
- Incision: along the lateral border of biceps, from 2 to 3cm distal to the axillary fold (coracoid level) to 5cm proximal to the antecubital crease (15 to 20cm)
- Brachialis split: retract biceps medially, find the midline of brachialis, split LONGITUDINALLY in the line of its fibres
- Radial nerve protection: proximal-to-distal exposure; subperiosteal dissection only (never circumferentially around the posterolateral humerus); for distal-third spiral patterns identify the nerve at the lateral intermuscular septum BEFORE fracture manipulation
- Plate fixation: 4.5mm narrow LCP on the ANTEROLATERAL humerus (tension side), 6 to 8 cortices proximal and distal (AO principles)
- Closure: brachialis repair optional (heals spontaneously), coaptation splint 7 to 10 days, early ROM at 2 weeks
Evidence-based outcomes
- Plate ORIF: high union (97 percent at an average 12 weeks in the Dabezies 1992 acute series); plating lowers reoperation and shoulder problems versus IM nailing
- Plate versus IM nail (Bhandari 2006 meta-analysis, 3 RCTs, 155 patients): lower reoperation (RR 0.26) and fewer shoulder problems (RR 0.10) with plating; authors called the cumulative evidence inconclusive
- Radial nerve palsy at injury: overall about 11.8 percent (Shao 2005); highest with middle/middle-distal and transverse/spiral patterns; distal-third OR 6.3 (Entezari 2021)
- Primary fracture palsy: about 71 percent recover spontaneously with conservative care (Shao 2005); operative fixation does not change recovery (Entezari 2021). Nerve studies if no recovery by around 9 weeks; consider exploration by 4 to 6 months
- Secondary (iatrogenic) palsy: about 4 to 6 percent after fixation (Entezari 2021); low threshold to re-explore if the nerve was handled or entrapped, otherwise observe; nerves in continuity nearly always recover, transection (open complex injury) has a poor prognosis (Ring 2004)
Indications and decision-making
- Absolute operative indications: open fractures, vascular injury, polytrauma, bilateral fractures, floating elbow, pathological fractures (metastases with more than 50 percent cortical destruction)
- Relative operative indications: failed closed reduction (more than 20 degrees varus/valgus, more than 30 degrees AP angulation, more than 3cm shortening), radial nerve palsy with manipulation, progressive displacement, segmental fractures
- Non-operative (functional bracing) β first-line for closed, isolated fractures with acceptable alignment (under 20 degrees varus/valgus, under 30 degrees AP, under 3cm shortening). High union (about 2 percent nonunion in closed fractures β Sarmiento 2000)
- Anterior approach best for: middle/distal-third shaft (below deltoid insertion), polytrauma (supine), distal shaft fractures
- Posterior approach best for: mid-shaft at the spiral groove (radial nerve directly visualised β Gerwin 1996), nerve exploration, revision surgery
Complications and management
- Radial nerve injury (secondary/iatrogenic about 4 to 6 percent): highest with distal-third spiral patterns (OR 6.3 β Entezari 2021). Prevent with subperiosteal dissection, proximal-to-distal exposure, and nerve identification for distal-third spirals
- Secondary post-op palsy (pre-op intact): suspect iatrogenic injury β low threshold for early re-exploration if the nerve was handled or entrapped (neurolysis or repair); most neurapraxic palsies recover spontaneously
- Primary fracture palsy (at injury): OBSERVE β about 71 percent spontaneous recovery (Shao 2005). Nerve studies if no recovery by around 9 weeks; consider exploration by 4 to 6 months
- Nonunion (5 to 8 percent): risk factors include inadequate fixation (fewer than 6 cortices), smoking and infection. Manage with revision ORIF and bone grafting (iliac crest autograft), a larger plate, and smoking cessation
- Infection (2 to 3 percent): superficial β oral antibiotics; deep β irrigation and debridement plus culture-guided IV antibiotics for 6 weeks, retaining hardware if healing is progressing
- Shoulder stiffness (10 to 15 percent): prevent with early ROM at 2 weeks and a short coaptation splint (7 to 10 days only); manage with physiotherapy, corticosteroid injection, or MUA if it persists beyond 6 months
Guidelines, registries and global practice
- Epidemiology: humeral shaft fractures are about 3 to 5 percent of all fractures, with a bimodal distribution β younger men from high-energy trauma and older women from low-energy osteoporotic falls
- Radial nerve palsy: overall about 11.8 percent at injury (Shao 2005); highest with middle/middle-distal and transverse/spiral patterns; distal-third fractures carry the greatest odds (Entezari 2021)
- Management paradigm (global consensus): functional bracing is first-line for closed, isolated fractures with acceptable alignment; operative fixation for open fractures, vascular injury, polytrauma, bilateral fractures, floating elbow, failed bracing, or unacceptable alignment. The FISH and HUSH randomised trials inform the surgery-versus-bracing debate
- Implant choice: plate fixation is the usual first-line; pooled data favour plating over IM nailing for lower reoperation and shoulder morbidity (Bhandari 2006). IM nailing retains a role in segmental, pathological and osteoporotic fractures
- Antibiotic prophylaxis: a single pre-incision first-generation cephalosporin (e.g. cefazolin) is standard worldwide; add gram-negative cover for open fractures per local protocols (e.g. BOAST, AAOS)
- Thromboprophylaxis: routine pharmacological VTE prophylaxis is generally NOT indicated for isolated upper-limb ORIF; early mobilisation is the primary prevention. Reserve chemoprophylaxis for additional VTE risk factors
- Analgesia: multimodal (paracetamol plus opioid as needed, opioid-sparing adjuncts); regional anaesthesia (interscalene block) gives good perioperative analgesia. Avoid routine NSAIDs in the early healing phase where nonunion is a concern
- Modifiable healing factors: smoking substantially increases nonunion risk β preoperative smoking cessation and optimisation of diabetes and nutrition are recommended globally
- Specialist referral: persistent radial nerve palsy beyond 4 to 6 months, or suspected nerve laceration, warrants referral to a peripheral nerve or upper-limb specialist for nerve studies and possible exploration, neurolysis, repair/graft, or tendon transfer
References
Plate Fixation of Acute Humeral Shaft Fractures
- Consecutive case series of 44 acute humeral shaft fractures treated with plate internal fixation
- Union: 97 percent (43 of 44) healed at an average of 12 weeks; the single failure (short plate pull-out) healed after revision with a longer plate and bone grafting
- All 11 open fractures (8 gunshot) healed uneventfully after early plating
- 15 radial nerve injuries were associated with the fractures; 12 anatomically intact palsies recovered at an average of 17 weeks after plate fixation
- Plate size varied with fracture location and bone size; 8 of 9 fractures fixed with 3.5mm plates healed uneventfully
Radial Nerve Topography Relative to Posterior Humeral Exposures
- Anatomical study of 10 cadaveric specimens defining the radial nerve course on the posterior humerus
- The nerve crossed the posterior humerus from a mean 20.7cm (SD 1.2) proximal to the medial epicondyle to a mean 14.2cm (SD 0.6) proximal to the lateral epicondyle
- A standard triceps-splitting approach exposed a mean 15.4cm of distal humerus up to the point where the nerve crossed
- A modified posterior approach (distal identification of the nerve, reflecting both triceps heads medially) exposed a mean 26.2cm of the diaphysis
- No branches to the medial head of triceps were found on the posterior humerus, supporting safe medial reflection in the modified approach
Radial Nerve Palsy with Humeral Shaft Fractures β Systematic Review
- Systematic review: 35 eligible papers; prevalence pooled from 21 papers (4,517 fractures), recovery from a total of 1,045 patients with palsy
- Overall prevalence of radial nerve palsy: 11.8 percent (532 of 4,517 fractures)
- Middle and middle-distal shaft fractures had significantly higher palsy rates; transverse and spiral patterns more than oblique or comminuted (p less than 0.001)
- Overall recovery: 88.1 percent (921 of 1,045); spontaneous recovery in conservatively treated patients: 70.7 percent (411 of 581)
- No significant difference in final results between expectant management and early exploration, favouring initial observation
Radial Nerve Palsy with High-Energy Humeral Shaft Fractures
- Retrospective review of 24 patients with high-energy diaphyseal humeral fractures and COMPLETE radial nerve palsy
- All 6 patients with a transected nerve had an open fracture as part of a complex upper-limb injury; 5 of 6 had primary repair and none recovered
- All 8 intact explored nerves and 9 of 10 unexplored nerves recovered; the single non-recovery followed closed IM rod fixation (possible iatrogenic injury)
- Mean time to first signs of recovery was 7 weeks (range 1 to 25); mean time to full recovery 6 months (range 1 to 21)
- Nerve transection was confined to open, complex injuries β the indication for exploration
Compression Plating versus Intramedullary Nailing β Meta-Analysis
- Meta-analysis of 3 homogeneous randomised trials (155 patients) comparing plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing
- Reoperation: significantly lower with plating (RR 0.26, 95 percent CI 0.007 to 0.9, p=0.03) β about a 74 percent relative risk reduction; one reoperation prevented for every 10 patients plated
- Shoulder problems: significantly lower with plating (RR 0.10, 95 percent CI 0.03 to 0.4, p=0.002), reflecting rotator cuff and impingement morbidity of antegrade nailing
- Authors concluded the cumulative evidence remained inconclusive and that a larger trial was needed
- Only 3 of 215 screened citations met inclusion criteria, underscoring the limited high-level evidence base
Functional Bracing for Fractures of the Humeral Diaphysis
- Landmark series of functional bracing for humeral diaphyseal fractures in 620 followed patients
- Nonunion occurred in only about 2 percent of closed fractures and about 6 percent of open fractures
- Bracing permitted early adjacent-joint motion and avoided surgical and anaesthetic risk
- Acceptable alignment was maintained in the large majority with varus/valgus and AP angulation within accepted limits
- Established functional bracing as the gold-standard non-operative option for closed, isolated shaft fractures with acceptable alignment
Predictors of Nerve Injury and Recovery After Humeral Shaft Fracture
- Retrospective cohort of 376 humeral shaft fractures (96 with traumatic nerve palsy, 280 neurovascularly intact)
- Nerve palsy present in 25.5 percent at injury; radial nerve most commonly involved (93.6 percent)
- Independent predictors of palsy: concomitant vascular injury (OR 52), distal-third fractures (OR 6.3), middle-third (OR 2.8) versus proximal, open fracture (OR 2.1), high-energy trauma (OR 1.7)
- Iatrogenic (secondary) nerve injury detected in 7 patients (4.6 percent), all affecting the radial nerve
- Spontaneous recovery in 91 percent of traumatic palsies; operative fixation did not change recovery rate; nerve studies recommended if no recovery by around 9 weeks
AO Principles of Fracture Management (2nd edition)
- Standard reference for absolute and relative stability, plate function (compression, neutralisation, buttress, bridge) and locked plating
- Diaphyseal fixation principles: 6 to 8 cortices of fixation proximal and distal to the fracture
- Reduction and fixation strategies for simple, wedge and complex (comminuted) fracture patterns
- Defines the framework for implant choice and surgical decision-making used in humeral shaft ORIF