Ceramic-on-Ceramic THA
Surgical technique guide for Ceramic-on-Ceramic THA bearing surfaces - FRCS Orth exam preparation
Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team
Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team
CERAMIC-ON-CERAMIC THA
Hard-on-hard bearing | Arthroplasty
DELTA
CLEAN
Critical Danger Structures
Ceramic Liner Integrity
Within acetabular shell. Location: Liner-shell interface with locking mechanism. Protection: DRY, CLEAN shell; PLASTIC impactor only; SINGLE impaction; 360° inspection for complete seating; never use metal directly on ceramic.
Ceramic Head Integrity
On femoral stem trunnion. Location: Head-taper (Morse taper) junction. Protection: DRY trunnion (wipe with sterile gauze); SINGLE firm impaction only; never tap multiple times (microcracks); use plastic or dedicated ceramic head impactor.
Morse Taper Surface
Femoral stem trunnion. Location: Junction between femoral component and head. Protection: Inspect for scratches or damage; keep absolutely DRY; any taper damage causes fretting corrosion and head dissociation risk.
Sciatic Nerve
Posterior to hip joint. Location: 1-2cm behind posterior acetabular rim, courses over short external rotators. Protection: Avoid over-retraction posteriorly; protect during capsulotomy; knee flexion reduces tension.
Femoral Neurovascular Bundle
Anterior to hip joint. Location: Femoral nerve, artery, vein in femoral triangle. Protection: Careful anterior retractor placement; avoid excessive anterior acetabular reaming; protect with anterior labrum if using DAA.
Ceramic Evolution and Composition
| Property | BIOLOX Delta (4th Gen) | Pure Alumina (3rd Gen) |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | Alumina matrix + zirconia platelets + chromium oxide | 99.9% pure alumina (Al₂O₃) |
| Fracture Rate | 0.02-0.05% | 0.1-0.2% |
| Fracture Toughness | 6.5 MPa√m | 4.0 MPa√m |
| Mechanism | Transformation toughening from zirconia | Brittle fracture |
| Grain Size | Submicron (0.5μm) | Larger grains |
| Head Sizes | 28mm, 32mm, 36mm available | Limited sizes |
Key Mechanism: Zirconia platelets undergo phase transformation (tetragonal → monoclinic) when stressed, absorbing energy and stopping crack propagation
Positioning and Preparation
Patient Position: Per surgical approach preference
- Lateral decubitus for posterior approach
- Supine for direct anterior approach
- Lateral for anterolateral approach
Surgical Approach: Surgeon-preferred approach - ceramic bearing compatible with all standard approaches
Key Preparation Points:
- Confirm ceramic inventory availability (specific sizes)
- Verify backup bearing option available
- Preoperative templating for component sizing
- Patient counseling about squeaking complete
Operative Technique
Step 1: BEARING SURFACE SELECTION
BEARING SURFACE SELECTION: CERAMIC-ON-CERAMIC (CoC) indicated for young active patients where wear and longevity are priorities. Modern 4th generation ceramics (BIOLOX delta = alumina matrix composite with zirconia and chromium oxide) have superior fracture resistance. Lowest wear rates of all bearing couples (<0.01mm/year linear wear). Confirm appropriate patient selection criteria met.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: BIOLOX DELTA is alumina matrix composite - NOT pure alumina. Contains zirconia platelets for transformation toughening. LOWEST WEAR of all bearings. Indicated in YOUNG, ACTIVE patients with good bone quality.
Dangers at this step
- Wrong bearing selection for patient profile (age, activity, expectations)
- Using older generation pure alumina ceramics (higher fracture risk)
- Inadequate patient counseling about squeaking possibility
Step 2: CONTRAINDICATION ASSESSMENT
CONTRAINDICATIONS AND RISKS: Absolute: known ceramic fracture history (any joint). Relative: severe hip dysplasia (cup position difficult), high BMI (component stress), patient anxiety about squeaking. SQUEAKING occurs in 1-10% - usually benign but distressing. FRACTURE risk reduced with modern ceramics but still exists (0.02-0.05% with BIOLOX delta).
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: SQUEAKING is NOT failure - occurs 1-10%, multifactorial (edge loading, cup position, stripe wear). Reassure patients. FRACTURE rate now <0.05% with 4th gen ceramics. Previous ceramic fracture = ABSOLUTE contraindication.
Dangers at this step
- Proceeding with contraindicated patient (prior ceramic fracture)
- Inadequate preoperative discussion about complications
- Not having backup bearing option available
Step 3: SURGICAL APPROACH AND EXPOSURE
SURGICAL APPROACH: Execute preferred approach (posterior, DAA, anterolateral). Excellent exposure essential for accurate cup positioning. CoC requires optimal visualization for precise component placement given less forgiving nature of hard-on-hard bearing.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: Approach selection does not affect ceramic bearing outcomes. What matters is achieving OPTIMAL CUP POSITION. Poor exposure → poor position → edge loading → squeaking/wear/failure.
Dangers at this step
- Inadequate exposure compromising cup positioning accuracy
- Excessive soft tissue retraction causing nerve injury
- Capsule damage affecting stability
Step 4: ACETABULAR PREPARATION
ACETABULAR PREPARATION: Standard sequential reaming technique. Remove all soft tissue from acetabular floor. Ream to bleeding subchondral bone. Critical to achieve optimal cup orientation - CoC is LESS FORGIVING of malposition than polyethylene. Target LEWINNEK SAFE ZONE: 40° ± 10° inclination, 15° ± 10° anteversion. For CoC, aim for narrower range: 35-45° inclination.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: CoC LESS FORGIVING of cup malposition than metal-on-poly. Edge loading causes stripe wear and squeaking. STEEP CUPS (more than 55°) associated with higher failure. Target tighter tolerances than Lewinnek for hard-on-hard bearings.
Dangers at this step
- Cup malposition outside target range (will cause edge loading)
- Over-reaming compromising press-fit
- Anterior column perforation with aggressive reaming
Step 5: SHELL INSERTION AND POSITIONING
SHELL INSERTION AND FIXATION: Standard press-fit technique with 1-2mm under-ream. Shell must be RIGIDLY FIXED before ceramic liner insertion. Any micromotion can cause liner dissociation. Supplemental screw fixation if any question of primary stability. Use alignment guides or navigation if available.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: RIGID SHELL FIXATION mandatory before ceramic liner insertion. Micromotion → liner dissociation risk. Use supplemental screws if ANY doubt about fixation quality. Position first, fixation second with CoC.
Dangers at this step
- Inadequate shell press-fit (leading to micromotion)
- Malposition locked in before recognizing error
- Over-impaction causing acetabular fracture
Step 6: SHELL POSITION VERIFICATION
SHELL POSITION VERIFICATION: Before liner insertion, confirm cup position within target range. Use intraoperative radiography if available. Assess inclination and anteversion. If outside optimal range for CoC, consider alternative bearing (polyethylene more forgiving). This is last chance to change bearing choice.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: Once ceramic liner is impacted, bearing choice is committed. If cup position suboptimal (more than 50° inclination), strongly consider polyethylene liner instead. INTRAOPERATIVE DECISION POINT.
Dangers at this step
- Proceeding with ceramic liner despite suboptimal cup position
- Missing opportunity to convert to polyethylene
- Inadequate position assessment before commitment
Step 7: SHELL PREPARATION FOR LINER
SHELL PREPARATION FOR LINER: Shell must be absolutely DRY and FREE OF DEBRIS before ceramic liner insertion. Any particle (bone, blood, cement, debris) can chip ceramic during impaction. Use sterile gauze to dry shell completely. Inspect for any loose material. No saline rinse (leave wet surface).
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: DRY, CLEAN shell is MANDATORY. Any debris causes ceramic chipping → third-body wear → accelerated failure. Wipe with DRY sterile gauze, not saline. Inspect 360° before liner insertion.
Dangers at this step
- Debris in shell causing ceramic chip during impaction
- Wet shell surface interfering with liner seating
- Blood/soft tissue in shell-liner interface
Step 8: CERAMIC LINER INSERTION - CRITICAL STEP
CERAMIC LINER INSERTION: Check liner orientation for locking mechanism alignment with shell. Use PLASTIC IMPACTOR (never metal directly on ceramic). Position liner in shell with correct orientation. Apply STEADY FIRM PRESSURE - listen for click confirming seating. SINGLE IMPACTION only - repeated impaction can chip liner. No adjustments once impacted.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: PLASTIC IMPACTOR only on ceramic. SINGLE IMPACTION with firm steady pressure. Never hammer directly on ceramic with metal. Multiple impaction attempts create microcracks and chips.
Dangers at this step
- Using metal impactor directly on ceramic liner
- Multiple impaction attempts causing chips/cracks
- Incorrect liner orientation (locking mechanism misaligned)
- Incomplete seating from inadequate impaction force
Step 9: LINER SEATING VERIFICATION
VERIFY LINER SEATING: After insertion, INSPECT 360° for complete seating. Run finger around liner-shell junction - any gap indicates incomplete seating. Check locking mechanism engaged (audible click, visual confirmation). Confirm no chips or cracks visible on liner face or edge. Any concern → remove and re-assess.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: 360° INSPECTION for complete seating is MANDATORY. Any visible gap = incomplete seating = dissociation risk. Check locking mechanism ENGAGED. Undetected incomplete seating → early failure.
Dangers at this step
- Missing incomplete liner seating (will dissociate)
- Undetected chip or crack (will propagate)
- Locking mechanism not engaged (liner will rotate/dissociate)
Step 10: FEMORAL PREPARATION
FEMORAL PREPARATION: Standard technique for chosen stem (cementless or cemented). Sequential broaching to appropriate size. Prepare for trial reduction. Ceramic head sizing per templating - confirm available inventory.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: Femoral preparation is standard technique. The critical ceramic-specific steps are in head placement. Ensure trunnion (Morse taper) remains undamaged during broaching and trialing.
Dangers at this step
- Damaging femoral stem trunnion during preparation
- Inadequate femoral stem fixation
- Femoral fracture from aggressive broaching
Step 11: TRIAL REDUCTION
TRIAL REDUCTION: Insert trial head on stem trunnion. Reduce hip and assess stability, leg length, offset. Standard testing in flexion, extension, rotation. AVOID extreme positions that cause edge loading during trials. Confirm appropriate head size and neck length.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: Trial reduction with trial head is standard. This assesses stability and leg length before committing to ceramic head. Avoid excessive testing in positions that stress ceramic edge (combined flexion/IR/adduction).
Dangers at this step
- Trunnion damage from trial head placement/removal
- Missing instability before final head placement
- Edge loading positions during aggressive stability testing
Step 12: TRUNNION PREPARATION FOR CERAMIC HEAD
TRUNNION PREPARATION: After removing trial head, inspect trunnion (Morse taper) carefully. Must be PRISTINE - any scratches or damage cause fretting corrosion and head dissociation risk. Taper must be absolutely DRY - wipe with sterile dry gauze. No saline. No blood. Completely dry surface essential for ceramic head seating.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: MORSE TAPER must be CLEAN, DRY, UNDAMAGED. Any scratches cause fretting corrosion → head dissociation. Inspect trunnion under direct vision. Wipe dry with sterile gauze - no wet surfaces.
Dangers at this step
- Damaged trunnion causing fretting corrosion and dissociation
- Wet taper causing poor ceramic head seating
- Blood/debris on taper interface
Step 13: CERAMIC HEAD IMPACTION
CERAMIC HEAD IMPACTION: Place ceramic head on dry trunnion. Confirm correct orientation. Single FIRM impaction using plastic or dedicated ceramic head impactor. Do NOT tap head multiple times - can create microcracks that propagate to fracture. Head should seat with audible click. Never use metal directly on ceramic head.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: DRY TAPER. SINGLE FIRM IMPACTION. Multiple taps create microcracks → delayed fracture. Never use metal mallet directly on ceramic. Audible click confirms seating.
Dangers at this step
- Wet taper causing poor seating → dissociation
- Multiple impactions creating microcracks → fracture
- Metal impactor damaging ceramic head
- Incomplete seating from inadequate impaction force
Step 14: REDUCTION AND STABILITY TESTING
REDUCTION AND STABILITY: Reduce hip. Standard stability testing in flexion, extension, internal/external rotation, adduction. AVOID EDGE LOADING positions during testing - extreme flexion with internal rotation and adduction stresses ceramic edge. Document ROM achieved. Confirm stable reduction in functional positions.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: Avoid extreme positions that cause EDGE LOADING during stability testing. Combined flexion/IR/adduction stresses ceramic bearing edge. Test stability but respect ceramic limitations.
Dangers at this step
- Edge loading causing ceramic damage during testing
- Dislocation during aggressive stability testing
- Missing subtle instability before closure
Step 15: CLOSURE AND POST-OPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS
CLOSURE AND POST-OPERATIVE CARE: Standard layered closure. Standard THA rehabilitation protocol. No specific activity restrictions beyond standard hip precautions. Counsel patient about SQUEAKING - occurs 1-10%, usually benign. Most squeaking improves over time. Long-term surveillance with standard follow-up schedule.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: COUNSEL about squeaking preoperatively - sets expectations. Squeaking is NOT indication for revision unless symptomatic impingement proven. Excellent long-term wear rates justify ceramic bearing in appropriate patients.
Dangers at this step
- Inadequate patient education about squeaking
- Patient anxiety leading to unnecessary revision request
- Missing postoperative complications (infection, dislocation)
Complications
Ceramic-on-Ceramic THA Complications
Post-operative Care
Immediate Post-operative:
- Standard THA recovery protocol
- Weight bearing as tolerated (unless bone quality concerns)
- VTE prophylaxis per institutional protocol
- Standard hip precautions per surgical approach
Rehabilitation:
- No specific restrictions beyond standard THA precautions
- Progressive ROM and strengthening
- Gait training with appropriate assistive device
- Standard return to activity timeline
Follow-up:
- 2 weeks: Wound check
- 6 weeks: Clinical and radiographic review
- 3 months: Function assessment
- 1 year: Standard annual review
- Annual or biennial long-term surveillance
Patient Education:
- Squeaking may occur (1-10%) - NOT failure
- Report acute onset pain or clicking (may indicate fracture)
- Excellent long-term wear expected
- Standard activity guidelines
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
"A 48-year-old active male construction worker presents for primary THA for end-stage osteoarthritis. He is otherwise healthy with BMI 26. He specifically asks about ceramic bearings. What are your considerations for bearing selection?"
"You are performing a ceramic-on-ceramic THA. Describe your technique for ceramic liner insertion and the critical technical points."
"A 52-year-old woman with previous ceramic-on-ceramic THA presents with sudden onset hip pain after hearing a 'crack' while getting up from a chair. X-rays suggest ceramic head fragmentation. How do you manage this?"
Ceramic-on-Ceramic THA - Exam Summary
High-Yield Exam Summary
References:
- D'Antonio JA, et al. Long-term experience with ceramic-on-ceramic THA. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(18):1703-1711.
- Hamilton WG, et al. Midterm prospective results of ceramic-on-ceramic articulation. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(6 Suppl):126-131.
- Chevillotte C, et al. Nine years follow-up of 100 ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2011;35(11):1599-1604.
- Traina F, et al. Long-term results of a cementless ceramic-on-ceramic THA. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(12):1052-1058.
- Jeffers JR, Walter WL. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in hip arthroplasty: state of the art and the future. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(6):735-745.
- Lusty PJ, et al. Fourth generation ceramic-on-ceramic THA. Bone Joint J. 2007;89-B(12):1630-1635.
- Walter WL, et al. Squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic hips: the importance of acetabular component orientation. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(4):496-503.
- Capello WN, et al. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: update. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(7 Suppl):39-43.
- Esposito CI, et al. What is the trouble with trunnions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(12):3652-3658.
- Hannouche D, et al. Thirty years of experience with alumina-on-alumina bearings in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2011;35(2):207-213.