Single anterior incision (preferred) or two-incision technique · intermediate difficulty
- Mechanism: an eccentric load — a sudden extension force against a contracting, flexed-supinated biceps — felt as a 'pop' in the antecubital fossa.
- Hook test (O'Driscoll): with the elbow at 90 degrees and the forearm actively supinated, you cannot hook the index finger laterally under the cord-like biceps tendon. Reported 100 percent sensitivity and 100 percent specificity, outperforming MRI.
- Untreated loss of function: about 30 to 40 percent of supination strength and 10 to 20 percent of flexion strength.
- Full FOREARM SUPINATION during all tuberosity work rotates the radial tuberosity anteriorly and swings the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) posterolaterally away from the field — the key safety manoeuvre.
- The cortical button is the strongest construct in pooled cadaveric biomechanical data; adding an interference screw to the button adds no strength, and suture anchors are significantly weaker.
- Repair early — within 3 to 4 weeks — for straightforward primary repair. Chronic ruptures retract and often need graft reconstruction.
- Single versus two incision: the single anterior incision is preferred (lower heterotopic ossification risk); the two-incision technique is chosen for a more anatomic footprint.
- The lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABCN) is the most commonly injured structure — identify and protect it in the subcutaneous plane before any deep dissection.
When & Why
Indication. Surgical repair of a distal biceps tendon rupture is offered to an active patient who wants to recover full supination and flexion strength — most often a complete acute avulsion in a middle-aged man after an eccentric load (a sudden extension force against a contracting biceps). The aim is to re-anchor the tendon to the radial tuberosity and recover the 30 to 40 percent of supination strength (and 10 to 20 percent of flexion strength) lost to a complete rupture. Optimal timing is within 3 to 4 weeks; after that the tendon retracts and shortens, primary repair becomes harder, and a graft may be required. Absolute indications:
- Complete distal biceps tendon rupture in an active patient needing full supination and flexion strength.
- An acute rupture (less than 4 weeks is the optimal window for primary repair).
- A partial tear that has failed non-operative treatment. Relative indications:
- A partial tear involving greater than 50 percent of the footprint that has failed conservative treatment.
- A high-demand athlete or manual worker.
- A chronic rupture in an otherwise active, motivated patient (where graft reconstruction is planned). When not to operate. Non-operative management is reasonable for the elderly or sedentary patient who accepts the strength loss, the low-demand patient content with 30 to 40 percent supination weakness, or anyone in whom significant comorbidity makes the surgical risk unreasonable. Contraindication. Active infection, or a patient who cannot comply with the rehabilitation protocol, are absolute contraindications. Relative contraindications are a chronic rupture (greater than 6 to 8 weeks) with marked retraction (which usually dictates graft reconstruction rather than simple repair), heavy smoking, or uncontrolled diabetes and vascular disease that raise the complication rate. The two-incision technique is specifically avoided where there is a prior ulnar fracture or hardware, a history of heterotopic ossification, or other synostosis risk factors. The one decision that matters: single anterior or two-incision. Every technique ends with the tendon secured to the radial tuberosity; the real choice is how you get there:
The preferred modern default. One anterior wound, cortical-button fixation, early motion. A lower risk of heterotopic ossification and synostosis, at the cost of a higher rate of transient LABCN neurapraxia (the most common nerve complication of this approach).
A second posterior muscle-splitting incision delivers the tuberosity more anatomically and is chosen for revision or when a more anatomic footprint is desired. Its signature complication is heterotopic ossification, driven by subperiosteal ulnar stripping — the Morrey muscle-splitting modification reduces this.
Reserved for chronic, retracted ruptures where the tendon will not reach the tuberosity without excess tension. An Achilles or hamstring autograft or allograft bridges the gap; direct primary repair of a chronic tear is a viable alternative where excursion and quality are adequate.
Pre-operative assessment. The diagnosis is clinical. The hook test (O'Driscoll) is the single most reliable bedside test: with the elbow at 90 degrees and the forearm actively supinated, the examiner hooks the index finger laterally under the cord-like biceps tendon; if no tendon can be hooked, it is a complete avulsion (reported 100 percent sensitivity and 100 percent specificity, exceeding MRI). The biceps squeeze test (Ruland) is supportive — squeezing the muscle belly produces passive forearm supination when the tendon is in continuity, and its absence suggests rupture. Look also for a palpable defect in the antecubital fossa and proximal retraction of the muscle belly. Imaging confirms rather than diagnoses. Plain films exclude a rare avulsion fracture; MRI confirms complete versus partial rupture, measures retraction and assesses tendon quality; ultrasound offers a dynamic view of retraction with elbow flexion. Counsel the patient on the approach options and on the specific complications — nerve injury (chiefly LABCN), heterotopic ossification, proximal radioulnar synostosis and re-rupture — and set the expectation of 95 percent or better good-to-excellent outcomes for acute repairs. Setup. Supine with the arm on an arm board and the forearm supinated; an upper-arm tourniquet for a bloodless field (a forearm tourniquet is an alternative if you need to judge tendon excursion). Have the cortical-button set (EndoButton or BicepsButton), a cannulated drill, high-strength suture (FiberWire or FiberLoop), a whipstitch needle and a rongeur or burr for tuberosity preparation ready. Fluoroscopy is optional for confirming button position.
The Operation
The goal is to retrieve the retracted tendon, prepare it, and re-anchor it to the radial tuberosity — protecting the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABCN) throughout, and protecting the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) by keeping the forearm fully supinated during all tuberosity work. The exposure below is the single anterior (modified Boyd-Anderson) approach, the dominant technique; the two-incision variant follows.

Surgical anatomy in the field. The tendon inserts on the ulnar (posterior) aspect of the radial tuberosity across a footprint of roughly 22 mm by 11 mm (the short head inserts slightly more distally, the long head more proximally). It is the forearm's most powerful supinator and a secondary elbow flexor — hence the 30 to 40 percent supination and 10 to 20 percent flexion loss when it avulses. The structures at risk define the whole operation:
The terminal sensory branch of the musculocutaneous nerve; it emerges lateral to the biceps and crosses the antecubital fossa superficially. The MOST COMMONLY injured structure — identify and protect it in the subcutaneous plane before any deep dissection.
The motor branch of the radial nerve; it wraps around the radial neck within the supinator. Protected by FULL SUPINATION, which rotates the tuberosity anteriorly and swings the PIN posterolaterally away from the field.
Lies medial to the biceps tendon in the antecubital fossa; retract medially during exposure.
A leash of vessels over the tuberosity that must be cauterised for a clear footprint; the nearby superficial radial nerve can be injured with aggressive lateral retraction.
Single anterior incision — operative sequence
- Supine, arm on an arm board, forearm supinated.
- Upper-arm tourniquet for a bloodless field; a forearm tourniquet is an option if you need to judge tendon excursion.
- Elbow extended or slightly flexed.
A forearm tourniquet lets you assess tendon excursion dynamically; an upper-arm tourniquet gives a bloodless field throughout. Most surgeons use the upper-arm tourniquet.
- A transverse or oblique incision in the antecubital fossa, about 3 to 4 cm, centred over the biceps tendon.
- A transverse incision follows Langer's lines for better cosmesis; extend proximally if the tendon is retracted.
- A second proximal incision is added if the stump has retracted well up the arm.
Stay lateral to the brachial artery pulse, avoid crossing the flexion crease at a right angle (contracture risk), and be ready to make a proximal extension for a retracted stump.
- In the subcutaneous plane, identify and protect the LABCN — it crosses the field in nearly every patient and is the most commonly injured nerve.
- Develop the interval between brachioradialis (laterally) and pronator teres (medially).
- Identify the radial artery and retract it medially; the biceps tendon stump comes into view in this interval.
If you have not seen the LABCN, you have not looked hard enough — it crosses the field in almost all patients. Identify and protect it before any deep dissection.
- Locate the retracted tendon, usually sitting at or above the antecubital crease; free it from adhesions with blunt finger dissection and deliver it into the wound (a proximal incision may be needed if it has retracted high).
- Debride the frayed end minimally to preserve length.
- Whipstitch the tendon with high-strength suture (FiberWire) using a Krackow or locking whipstitch pattern, leaving the tails for button passage.
If the tendon will not reach the tuberosity without tension, release adhesions and the lacertus fibrosus more extensively; if excursion or quality is inadequate, use graft reconstruction (Achilles, hamstring or other allograft/autograft). Never repair under excessive tension — it causes a flexion contracture or early failure. Where residual excursion and quality are adequate, direct primary repair of a chronic tear is a viable alternative to graft, with good satisfaction and range of motion and only a mildly higher transient LABCN palsy rate.
- Place the forearm in FULL SUPINATION — the critical PIN-protection manoeuvre.
- Supination rotates the tuberosity anteriorly (into your wound) and swings the PIN posterolaterally, away from the instruments.
- Identify the tuberosity on the anteromedial radius, clear the soft tissue from the footprint and cauterise the radial recurrent vessels (leash of Henry) to visualise the whole footprint.
The PIN wraps around the radial neck in pronation. Full supination moves it away from your instruments by rotating the tuberosity anteriorly — maintain it through exposure, drilling and button placement.
- Place the guide pin at the centre of the footprint; confirm position with imaging if desired.
- Drill unicortically with the appropriately sized cannulated drill, completing the track through the far cortex so the button will pass and flip.
- A shallow unicortical socket may be created to seat the tendon and improve bone-tendon contact — do not make it so deep that it weakens the bone.
Keep the forearm supinated, drill perpendicular to the radius, protect the soft tissues with retractors, and do not plunge aggressively through the far cortex (PIN or far-cortex injury).
- Pass the tendon sutures through the button eyelet.
- Insert the button into the drill hole, push it through to the far cortex, and flip it by pulling on the sutures — feel the 'pop'.
- Confirm engagement: a firm tug, fluoroscopy if in doubt, the button flush on the far cortex.
The pop as the button flips is reassuring. If you do not feel it, image to confirm the button is through and flipped — an unflipped button will pull out.
- Pull the tendon into the tuberosity socket.
- Tension with the elbow at 30 to 40 degrees of flexion and the forearm supinated — the tendon should reach without excessive tension.
- Confirm full elbow extension is possible without a gap and without producing a flexion contracture; check smooth pronation and supination.
Over-tensioning causes a flexion contracture and loss of extension; under-tensioning causes weakness and incomplete healing. The target is full extension possible with the tendon engaged.
- Test full elbow extension (tendon stays docked), full flexion (no impingement) and full pronation and supination (smooth, no catching).
- Release the tourniquet, achieve haemostasis with bipolar cautery, and ensure no haematoma.
- Layered closure: close the deep fascia loosely if possible, then subcutaneous absorbable sutures and skin (nylon or absorbable).
- Apply a posterior splint with the elbow at 90 degrees of flexion and the forearm in neutral to slight supination.
- Early motion begins at 1 to 2 weeks.
Two-incision (Boyd-Anderson / Morrey) technique
- The anterior incision and tendon retrieval are identical to the single-incision technique; a smaller anterior wound often suffices.
- Whipstitch the tendon as before.
- A second incision is made over the posterior radius, lateral to the ulna.
- Split the common extensor mass (the Morrey modification) rather than stripping the ulna subperiosteally — this is what reduces heterotopic ossification.
- Expose the radial tuberosity from posterior and create bone tunnels or place suture anchors to dock the tendon.
Heterotopic ossification is the most common complication of the two-incision approach (about 7 percent in pooled meta-analysis data; older small series quoted wide ranges up to the tens of percent). It is driven by subperiosteal stripping of the ulna and proximal radius — the original Boyd-Anderson exposed bare ulna — and the Morrey muscle-splitting modification markedly reduces both heterotopic ossification and synostosis. Most heterotopic bone is asymptomatic, but it can cause stiffness or a proximal radioulnar synostosis with loss of forearm rotation.
- Single anterior
- Higher (most common complication; about 9.8 percent in meta-analysis, mostly transient)
- Two-incision
- Lower (not in the posterior field; about 3 percent in RCT data)
- Single anterior
- Low if full supination is maintained
- Two-incision
- Low; posterior dissection kept on the radius, muscle-splitting
- Single anterior
- Lower — the dominant HO complication of two-incision is avoided
- Two-incision
- Higher (most common complication of this approach; about 7 percent in meta-analysis)
- Single anterior
- Rare
- Two-incision
- Higher risk; subperiosteal stripping is the key driver (modified muscle-splitting reduces it)
- Single anterior
- No significant difference between approaches in pooled RCT/cohort data
- Two-incision
- No significant difference between approaches
- Single anterior
- Good; the cortical button reliably docks the tendon into the tuberosity
- Two-incision
- Traditionally cited as more anatomic
- Single anterior
- Equivalent at 1 to 2 years; one RCT showed 10 percent greater flexion strength with two-incision
- Two-incision
- Equivalent; some series report more unsatisfactory results from loss of forearm rotation
- Strength
- Highest failure load in pooled cadaveric data (significantly stronger than a suture anchor)
- Advantages
- Immediate strength, allows early motion, single anterior incision
- Disadvantages
- Far-cortex or PIN injury if the drill plunges, button prominence, cost
- Strength
- Significantly weaker than the cortical button
- Advantages
- Familiar technique, no far-cortex drilling
- Disadvantages
- Lower strength, may limit aggressive early loading
- Strength
- Intermediate; adding a screw to a button does NOT increase strength
- Advantages
- Bone-tendon compression healing
- Disadvantages
- Tendon laceration or abrasion risk, technique-sensitive
- Strength
- Comparable to other implant-free constructs
- Advantages
- Low cost, no implant
- Disadvantages
- Tunnel or bridge fracture risk, traditionally two-incision
In pooled cadaveric data the cortical button has the highest adjusted failure load and a lower risk of gap formation (type 2 failure) than interference screws or implant-free tunnels; suture anchors are significantly weaker than the button, and adding an interference screw to a button does not add strength. This biomechanical edge underpins early-motion rehabilitation and is why the cortical button is the most widely used construct internationally. Absolute failure loads vary widely between studies and specimens — quote the comparative ranking, not one Newton figure.
Aftercare & Complications
Rehabilitation progresses in phases — the cortical button's biomechanical strength is what permits early motion. | Phase | Timing | Immobilisation | Therapy focus | |-------|--------|----------------|---------------| | Immediate | 0 to 2 weeks | Posterior splint, elbow at 90 degrees, forearm neutral to slight supination | Finger and wrist range of motion only | | Early | 2 to 6 weeks | Removable splint | Passive extension and active flexion out of the splint; avoid terminal extension beyond about 30 degrees; NO resisted supination | | Intermediate | 6 to 12 weeks | Splint for heavy tasks only | Isometric then light resisted strengthening; full range of motion; concentric then eccentric loading; sport-specific work begins | | Return to activity | 12 to 16 weeks and beyond | None | Graded return to function | - Light desk work: 2 to 4 weeks.
- Light manual work: 6 to 8 weeks.
- Heavy manual work: 12 to 16 weeks.
- Full sport: 4 to 6 months. Expected outcome is 95 percent or better satisfaction with near-normal strength for acute repairs. Complications
- Recognition
- Lateral forearm numbness or paraesthesia; a Tinel sign over the nerve
- Prevention
- Identify and protect early; careful retraction; avoid thermal injury
- Management
- Observation — most recover. Persistent painful neuroma: neurolysis or neurectomy
- Recognition
- Weakness of finger and thumb extension; partial wrist drop
- Prevention
- Full supination during all tuberosity work; avoid excessive retraction
- Management
- Observation 3 to 6 months (most recover); EMG at 3 months; exploration if no recovery
- Recognition
- Progressive stiffness and pain with motion, especially pronation and supination
- Prevention
- Single-incision technique; gentle tissue handling; consider indomethacin prophylaxis
- Management
- Observe if asymptomatic; surgical excision if symptomatic after maturation (12 months or more)
- Recognition
- Loss of pronation and supination; a bony block on imaging
- Prevention
- Single incision; avoid ulnar periosteal injury; gentle dissection
- Management
- Excision with interposition (fat, fascia) after maturation
- Recognition
- Sudden weakness and pain; a palpable defect
- Prevention
- Adequate fixation; appropriate rehabilitation; avoid early loading
- Management
- Revision repair with graft if needed (acute: direct repair if possible)
- Recognition
- Pain and deformity; fracture on X-ray
- Prevention
- Appropriate drill or socket size; avoid over-reaming; protect the cortex
- Management
- ORIF with plate fixation; bone graft as needed
- Recognition
- Loss of flexion or extension, especially loss of full extension
- Prevention
- Early range of motion; avoid over-tensioning
- Management
- Physiotherapy and splinting; rarely surgical release
- Recognition
- Infection, haematoma, dehiscence
- Prevention
- Meticulous haemostasis; layered closure; appropriate wound care
- Management
- Antibiotics, drainage and wound care as needed
Nerve injury in more detail. The LABCN is the most commonly injured structure — an incidence of roughly 10 to 25 percent transient and 1 to 5 percent permanent, presenting as lateral forearm numbness and usually resolving with observation. PIN injury is far rarer (1 to 3 percent): it presents as finger and thumb extension weakness with preserved wrist extension (ECRL and ECRB are supplied more proximally), is protected by supination, and again most recover with observation.
Viva & Exam Focus
RUPTURERUPTURE — clinical features of a distal biceps rupture
BUTTONBUTTON — cortical button fixation steps
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A 42-year-old manual labourer presents with pain and weakness 24 hours after feeling a 'pop' in his elbow while lifting. You cannot hook your finger under the biceps tendon. How do you manage this patient?”
“Explain why forearm supination is critical during distal biceps repair and how it protects the posterior interosseous nerve.”
“A patient develops complete loss of finger and thumb extension two weeks after a distal biceps repair. How do you assess and manage this?”
Clinical features
- A 'pop' in the antecubital fossa on eccentric loading
- Hook test (O'Driscoll): cannot hook the tendon equals complete rupture
- Supination weakness greater than flexion weakness
- Ecchymosis and a palpable defect in the antecubital fossa
Critical technical points
- Full supination protects the PIN — maintain it through all tuberosity work
- Identify the LABCN early — the most commonly injured nerve
- Cortical button is the strongest construct biomechanically
- Tension at 30 to 40 degrees flexion — should allow full extension
Structures at risk
- LABCN — superficial, crosses the field, most common injury
- PIN — protected by supination, at risk in pronation
- Radial artery — retract medially
- Radial recurrent vessels (leash of Henry) — cauterise
Timing
- Acute (less than 4 weeks): primary repair, best outcomes
- Subacute (4 to 8 weeks): more dissection, possible shortening
- Chronic (greater than 8 weeks): often needs graft reconstruction
Single versus two incision
- Single: lower HO and synostosis risk, the preferred default
- Two-incision: more anatomic footprint, higher HO risk
- Broadly equivalent functional outcomes
- The Morrey muscle-splitting modification reduces HO
Exam tips
- The hook test is the most specific clinical sign
- Untreated loss is 30 to 40 percent supination, 10 to 20 percent flexion
- Supination is the key safety manoeuvre — know why
- Cortical button is strongest; suture anchor weaker; button plus screw no stronger than button alone
Background & Evidence
Epidemiology and mechanism. A distal biceps rupture typically occurs in an active, middle-aged patient under an eccentric load — a sudden extension force against a contracting, flexed-supinated biceps, felt as the classic 'pop' in the antecubital fossa. Complete avulsion produces the strength deficit that defines the condition: about 30 to 40 percent of supination and 10 to 20 percent of flexion, because the biceps is the forearm's most powerful supinator and a secondary elbow flexor. A partial tear produces a lesser, activity-related deficit. Classification by timing. The practical classification that drives management is time from injury, because the tendon retracts and stiffens:
- Timing
- Less than 4 weeks
- Typical operative implication
- Straightforward primary repair — best outcomes
- Timing
- 4 to 8 weeks
- Typical operative implication
- More dissection needed, possible tendon shortening; primary repair often still possible
- Timing
- Greater than 8 weeks
- Typical operative implication
- Retracted and stiff — often requires graft reconstruction (Achilles, hamstring)
References
Single versus double-incision technique for repair of acute distal biceps tendon ruptures: a randomized clinical trial
- 91 patients randomized: single-incision with two suture anchors (n=47) vs double-incision with transosseous tunnels (n=44)
- No difference in ASES, DASH or PREE scores at 2 years; double-incision had a 10% advantage in final isometric flexion strength (104% vs 94%, p=0.01)
- Single-incision had significantly more transient LABCN neurapraxias (19/47 vs 3/43, p less than 0.001)
- Four reruptures, all attributable to early reinjury or noncompliance rather than fixation type
Repair techniques for acute distal biceps tendon ruptures: a systematic review
- 22 studies, 498 elbows; overall complication rate 24.5%
- Complication rate 23.9% one-incision vs 25.7% two-incision (p=0.32, not significant)
- By fixation: cortical button 0%, bone tunnels 20.4%, suture anchors 26.4%, intraosseous screws 44.8%; button and tunnels significantly lower than screws
- LABCN neurapraxia was the most common complication overall (9.6%)
Complications of distal biceps tendon repair: a meta-analysis of single-incision versus double-incision surgical technique
- 87 articles pooled by surgical approach
- LABCN neurapraxia was the most common complication of single-incision repair (77/785, 9.8%)
- Heterotopic ossification was the most common complication of double-incision repair (36/498, 7.2%)
- Overall reported complication frequency, including rerupture and nerve injury, was higher for single-incision; HO was higher for double-incision
Optimizing fixation for distal biceps tendon repairs: a systematic review and meta-regression of cadaveric biomechanical testing
- 14 cadaveric biomechanical studies pooled by meta-regression of adjusted failure load
- Cortical button had the highest adjusted failure load; suture anchor was significantly weaker than cortical button (difference 154 N, 95% CI 30-279)
- Adding an interference screw to a cortical button did NOT increase failure load
- Cortical button carried lower odds of type 2 (gap) failure than screws or implant-free tunnels; a locking stitch added 113 N but raised type 2 failure odds
The hook test for distal biceps tendon avulsion
- 45 patients undergoing surgical exploration; hook test performed at 90 degrees flexion with active supination
- Abnormal hook test in 33/33 complete avulsions and intact in all 12 partial tears
- Sensitivity and specificity both 100%, exceeding MRI (sensitivity 92%, specificity 85%)
- A painful but intact hook test suggested a partial tear in 9/12 partial cases
Repair of the ruptured distal biceps tendon: a systematic review
An early systematic review of distal biceps repair techniques and their complications, establishing the complication profile that later meta-analyses refined.
Repair of distal biceps tendon rupture: a new technique using the Endobutton
The original description of single-incision distal biceps repair with the cortical Endobutton — the construct that became the biomechanical and clinical benchmark.
Outcomes and patient satisfaction of delayed distal biceps repairs without graft augmentation: a systematic review
- Pooled delayed repairs performed without graft augmentation showed good patient satisfaction and range of motion
- Only a mildly higher rate of transient LABCN palsy compared with acute repair
- Supports direct primary repair of selected chronic tears where tendon excursion and quality are adequate, rather than routine grafting