Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Distal Biceps Tendon Repair

Operative SurgeryShoulder & Elbow
Shoulder & ElbowIntermediateCore Procedure

Distal Biceps Tendon Repair

How to repair a distal biceps tendon rupture — the single anterior (modified Boyd-Anderson) exposure laid out step by step with the radial tuberosity approach, cortical-button fixation, the supination manoeuvre that protects the posterior interosseous nerve, single versus two-incision decision, and rehabilitation. advanced orthopaedic operative-surgery guide.

Procedure console
40 min
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Single anterior incision (preferred) or two-incision technique · intermediate difficulty

Shoulder-ElbowSubspecialty
10Key operative steps
30-40%Supination loss if untreated
45-60 minTypical duration
Critical Must-Knows
  • Mechanism: an eccentric load — a sudden extension force against a contracting, flexed-supinated biceps — felt as a 'pop' in the antecubital fossa.
  • Hook test (O'Driscoll): with the elbow at 90 degrees and the forearm actively supinated, you cannot hook the index finger laterally under the cord-like biceps tendon. Reported 100 percent sensitivity and 100 percent specificity, outperforming MRI.
  • Untreated loss of function: about 30 to 40 percent of supination strength and 10 to 20 percent of flexion strength.
  • Full FOREARM SUPINATION during all tuberosity work rotates the radial tuberosity anteriorly and swings the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) posterolaterally away from the field — the key safety manoeuvre.
  • The cortical button is the strongest construct in pooled cadaveric biomechanical data; adding an interference screw to the button adds no strength, and suture anchors are significantly weaker.
  • Repair early — within 3 to 4 weeks — for straightforward primary repair. Chronic ruptures retract and often need graft reconstruction.
  • Single versus two incision: the single anterior incision is preferred (lower heterotopic ossification risk); the two-incision technique is chosen for a more anatomic footprint.
  • The lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABCN) is the most commonly injured structure — identify and protect it in the subcutaneous plane before any deep dissection.

When & Why


Indication. Surgical repair of a distal biceps tendon rupture is offered to an active patient who wants to recover full supination and flexion strength — most often a complete acute avulsion in a middle-aged man after an eccentric load (a sudden extension force against a contracting biceps). The aim is to re-anchor the tendon to the radial tuberosity and recover the 30 to 40 percent of supination strength (and 10 to 20 percent of flexion strength) lost to a complete rupture. Optimal timing is within 3 to 4 weeks; after that the tendon retracts and shortens, primary repair becomes harder, and a graft may be required. Absolute indications:

  • Complete distal biceps tendon rupture in an active patient needing full supination and flexion strength.
  • An acute rupture (less than 4 weeks is the optimal window for primary repair).
  • A partial tear that has failed non-operative treatment. Relative indications:
  • A partial tear involving greater than 50 percent of the footprint that has failed conservative treatment.
  • A high-demand athlete or manual worker.
  • A chronic rupture in an otherwise active, motivated patient (where graft reconstruction is planned). When not to operate. Non-operative management is reasonable for the elderly or sedentary patient who accepts the strength loss, the low-demand patient content with 30 to 40 percent supination weakness, or anyone in whom significant comorbidity makes the surgical risk unreasonable. Contraindication. Active infection, or a patient who cannot comply with the rehabilitation protocol, are absolute contraindications. Relative contraindications are a chronic rupture (greater than 6 to 8 weeks) with marked retraction (which usually dictates graft reconstruction rather than simple repair), heavy smoking, or uncontrolled diabetes and vascular disease that raise the complication rate. The two-incision technique is specifically avoided where there is a prior ulnar fracture or hardware, a history of heterotopic ossification, or other synostosis risk factors. The one decision that matters: single anterior or two-incision. Every technique ends with the tendon secured to the radial tuberosity; the real choice is how you get there:
Single anterior incision

The preferred modern default. One anterior wound, cortical-button fixation, early motion. A lower risk of heterotopic ossification and synostosis, at the cost of a higher rate of transient LABCN neurapraxia (the most common nerve complication of this approach).

Two-incision (Boyd-Anderson)

A second posterior muscle-splitting incision delivers the tuberosity more anatomically and is chosen for revision or when a more anatomic footprint is desired. Its signature complication is heterotopic ossification, driven by subperiosteal ulnar stripping — the Morrey muscle-splitting modification reduces this.

Graft reconstruction

Reserved for chronic, retracted ruptures where the tendon will not reach the tuberosity without excess tension. An Achilles or hamstring autograft or allograft bridges the gap; direct primary repair of a chronic tear is a viable alternative where excursion and quality are adequate.

Pre-operative assessment. The diagnosis is clinical. The hook test (O'Driscoll) is the single most reliable bedside test: with the elbow at 90 degrees and the forearm actively supinated, the examiner hooks the index finger laterally under the cord-like biceps tendon; if no tendon can be hooked, it is a complete avulsion (reported 100 percent sensitivity and 100 percent specificity, exceeding MRI). The biceps squeeze test (Ruland) is supportive — squeezing the muscle belly produces passive forearm supination when the tendon is in continuity, and its absence suggests rupture. Look also for a palpable defect in the antecubital fossa and proximal retraction of the muscle belly. Imaging confirms rather than diagnoses. Plain films exclude a rare avulsion fracture; MRI confirms complete versus partial rupture, measures retraction and assesses tendon quality; ultrasound offers a dynamic view of retraction with elbow flexion. Counsel the patient on the approach options and on the specific complications — nerve injury (chiefly LABCN), heterotopic ossification, proximal radioulnar synostosis and re-rupture — and set the expectation of 95 percent or better good-to-excellent outcomes for acute repairs. Setup. Supine with the arm on an arm board and the forearm supinated; an upper-arm tourniquet for a bloodless field (a forearm tourniquet is an alternative if you need to judge tendon excursion). Have the cortical-button set (EndoButton or BicepsButton), a cannulated drill, high-strength suture (FiberWire or FiberLoop), a whipstitch needle and a rongeur or burr for tuberosity preparation ready. Fluoroscopy is optional for confirming button position.

The Operation


The goal is to retrieve the retracted tendon, prepare it, and re-anchor it to the radial tuberosity — protecting the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABCN) throughout, and protecting the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) by keeping the forearm fully supinated during all tuberosity work. The exposure below is the single anterior (modified Boyd-Anderson) approach, the dominant technique; the two-incision variant follows.

Distal biceps tendon repair
Distal biceps tendon repair: the avulsed tendon is whip-stitched and reattached to the radial tuberosity.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Surgical anatomy in the field. The tendon inserts on the ulnar (posterior) aspect of the radial tuberosity across a footprint of roughly 22 mm by 11 mm (the short head inserts slightly more distally, the long head more proximally). It is the forearm's most powerful supinator and a secondary elbow flexor — hence the 30 to 40 percent supination and 10 to 20 percent flexion loss when it avulses. The structures at risk define the whole operation:

Lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABCN)

The terminal sensory branch of the musculocutaneous nerve; it emerges lateral to the biceps and crosses the antecubital fossa superficially. The MOST COMMONLY injured structure — identify and protect it in the subcutaneous plane before any deep dissection.

Posterior interosseous nerve (PIN)

The motor branch of the radial nerve; it wraps around the radial neck within the supinator. Protected by FULL SUPINATION, which rotates the tuberosity anteriorly and swings the PIN posterolaterally away from the field.

Radial artery

Lies medial to the biceps tendon in the antecubital fossa; retract medially during exposure.

Radial recurrent vessels (leash of Henry)

A leash of vessels over the tuberosity that must be cauterised for a clear footprint; the nearby superficial radial nerve can be injured with aggressive lateral retraction.

Single anterior incision — operative sequence

Step 1Position and set up
  • Supine, arm on an arm board, forearm supinated.
  • Upper-arm tourniquet for a bloodless field; a forearm tourniquet is an option if you need to judge tendon excursion.
  • Elbow extended or slightly flexed.
Tourniquet choice

A forearm tourniquet lets you assess tendon excursion dynamically; an upper-arm tourniquet gives a bloodless field throughout. Most surgeons use the upper-arm tourniquet.

Step 2Anterior (modified Boyd-Anderson) skin incision
  • A transverse or oblique incision in the antecubital fossa, about 3 to 4 cm, centred over the biceps tendon.
  • A transverse incision follows Langer's lines for better cosmesis; extend proximally if the tendon is retracted.
  • A second proximal incision is added if the stump has retracted well up the arm.
Incision placement

Stay lateral to the brachial artery pulse, avoid crossing the flexion crease at a right angle (contracture risk), and be ready to make a proximal extension for a retracted stump.

Step 3Superficial dissection — protect the LABCN
  • In the subcutaneous plane, identify and protect the LABCN — it crosses the field in nearly every patient and is the most commonly injured nerve.
  • Develop the interval between brachioradialis (laterally) and pronator teres (medially).
  • Identify the radial artery and retract it medially; the biceps tendon stump comes into view in this interval.
Find the LABCN first

If you have not seen the LABCN, you have not looked hard enough — it crosses the field in almost all patients. Identify and protect it before any deep dissection.

Step 4Retrieve and prepare the tendon
  • Locate the retracted tendon, usually sitting at or above the antecubital crease; free it from adhesions with blunt finger dissection and deliver it into the wound (a proximal incision may be needed if it has retracted high).
  • Debride the frayed end minimally to preserve length.
  • Whipstitch the tendon with high-strength suture (FiberWire) using a Krackow or locking whipstitch pattern, leaving the tails for button passage.
Chronic ruptures — do not over-tension

If the tendon will not reach the tuberosity without tension, release adhesions and the lacertus fibrosus more extensively; if excursion or quality is inadequate, use graft reconstruction (Achilles, hamstring or other allograft/autograft). Never repair under excessive tension — it causes a flexion contracture or early failure. Where residual excursion and quality are adequate, direct primary repair of a chronic tear is a viable alternative to graft, with good satisfaction and range of motion and only a mildly higher transient LABCN palsy rate.

Step 5Expose the radial tuberosity — SUPINATE
  • Place the forearm in FULL SUPINATION — the critical PIN-protection manoeuvre.
  • Supination rotates the tuberosity anteriorly (into your wound) and swings the PIN posterolaterally, away from the instruments.
  • Identify the tuberosity on the anteromedial radius, clear the soft tissue from the footprint and cauterise the radial recurrent vessels (leash of Henry) to visualise the whole footprint.
Supination is the key safety manoeuvre

The PIN wraps around the radial neck in pronation. Full supination moves it away from your instruments by rotating the tuberosity anteriorly — maintain it through exposure, drilling and button placement.

Step 6Prepare the tuberosity (cortical button)
  • Place the guide pin at the centre of the footprint; confirm position with imaging if desired.
  • Drill unicortically with the appropriately sized cannulated drill, completing the track through the far cortex so the button will pass and flip.
  • A shallow unicortical socket may be created to seat the tendon and improve bone-tendon contact — do not make it so deep that it weakens the bone.
Drilling hazards

Keep the forearm supinated, drill perpendicular to the radius, protect the soft tissues with retractors, and do not plunge aggressively through the far cortex (PIN or far-cortex injury).

Step 7Button passage and fixation
  • Pass the tendon sutures through the button eyelet.
  • Insert the button into the drill hole, push it through to the far cortex, and flip it by pulling on the sutures — feel the 'pop'.
  • Confirm engagement: a firm tug, fluoroscopy if in doubt, the button flush on the far cortex.
The flip 'pop'

The pop as the button flips is reassuring. If you do not feel it, image to confirm the button is through and flipped — an unflipped button will pull out.

Step 8Dock and tension the tendon
  • Pull the tendon into the tuberosity socket.
  • Tension with the elbow at 30 to 40 degrees of flexion and the forearm supinated — the tendon should reach without excessive tension.
  • Confirm full elbow extension is possible without a gap and without producing a flexion contracture; check smooth pronation and supination.
Tension errors

Over-tensioning causes a flexion contracture and loss of extension; under-tensioning causes weakness and incomplete healing. The target is full extension possible with the tendon engaged.

Step 9Range-of-motion check and haemostasis
  • Test full elbow extension (tendon stays docked), full flexion (no impingement) and full pronation and supination (smooth, no catching).
  • Release the tourniquet, achieve haemostasis with bipolar cautery, and ensure no haematoma.
Step 10Closure and immobilisation
  • Layered closure: close the deep fascia loosely if possible, then subcutaneous absorbable sutures and skin (nylon or absorbable).
  • Apply a posterior splint with the elbow at 90 degrees of flexion and the forearm in neutral to slight supination.
  • Early motion begins at 1 to 2 weeks.

Two-incision (Boyd-Anderson / Morrey) technique

Anterior woundRetrieve the tendon as above
  • The anterior incision and tendon retrieval are identical to the single-incision technique; a smaller anterior wound often suffices.
  • Whipstitch the tendon as before.
Posterior woundMuscle-splitting exposure of the tuberosity
  • A second incision is made over the posterior radius, lateral to the ulna.
  • Split the common extensor mass (the Morrey modification) rather than stripping the ulna subperiosteally — this is what reduces heterotopic ossification.
  • Expose the radial tuberosity from posterior and create bone tunnels or place suture anchors to dock the tendon.
Heterotopic ossification — the two-incision signature complication

Heterotopic ossification is the most common complication of the two-incision approach (about 7 percent in pooled meta-analysis data; older small series quoted wide ranges up to the tens of percent). It is driven by subperiosteal stripping of the ulna and proximal radius — the original Boyd-Anderson exposed bare ulna — and the Morrey muscle-splitting modification markedly reduces both heterotopic ossification and synostosis. Most heterotopic bone is asymptomatic, but it can cause stiffness or a proximal radioulnar synostosis with loss of forearm rotation.

LABCN neurapraxia
Single anterior
Higher (most common complication; about 9.8 percent in meta-analysis, mostly transient)
Two-incision
Lower (not in the posterior field; about 3 percent in RCT data)
PIN risk
Single anterior
Low if full supination is maintained
Two-incision
Low; posterior dissection kept on the radius, muscle-splitting
Heterotopic ossification
Single anterior
Lower — the dominant HO complication of two-incision is avoided
Two-incision
Higher (most common complication of this approach; about 7 percent in meta-analysis)
Synostosis / loss of rotation
Single anterior
Rare
Two-incision
Higher risk; subperiosteal stripping is the key driver (modified muscle-splitting reduces it)
Overall complication rate
Single anterior
No significant difference between approaches in pooled RCT/cohort data
Two-incision
No significant difference between approaches
Footprint restoration
Single anterior
Good; the cortical button reliably docks the tendon into the tuberosity
Two-incision
Traditionally cited as more anatomic
Functional outcome
Single anterior
Equivalent at 1 to 2 years; one RCT showed 10 percent greater flexion strength with two-incision
Two-incision
Equivalent; some series report more unsatisfactory results from loss of forearm rotation
Single anterior versus two-incision technique
FeatureSingle anteriorTwo-incision
LABCN neurapraxiaHigher (most common complication; about 9.8 percent in meta-analysis, mostly transient)Lower (not in the posterior field; about 3 percent in RCT data)
PIN riskLow if full supination is maintainedLow; posterior dissection kept on the radius, muscle-splitting
Heterotopic ossificationLower — the dominant HO complication of two-incision is avoidedHigher (most common complication of this approach; about 7 percent in meta-analysis)
Synostosis / loss of rotationRareHigher risk; subperiosteal stripping is the key driver (modified muscle-splitting reduces it)
Overall complication rateNo significant difference between approaches in pooled RCT/cohort dataNo significant difference between approaches
Footprint restorationGood; the cortical button reliably docks the tendon into the tuberosityTraditionally cited as more anatomic
Functional outcomeEquivalent at 1 to 2 years; one RCT showed 10 percent greater flexion strength with two-incisionEquivalent; some series report more unsatisfactory results from loss of forearm rotation
Cortical button
Strength
Highest failure load in pooled cadaveric data (significantly stronger than a suture anchor)
Advantages
Immediate strength, allows early motion, single anterior incision
Disadvantages
Far-cortex or PIN injury if the drill plunges, button prominence, cost
Suture anchors
Strength
Significantly weaker than the cortical button
Advantages
Familiar technique, no far-cortex drilling
Disadvantages
Lower strength, may limit aggressive early loading
Interference screw
Strength
Intermediate; adding a screw to a button does NOT increase strength
Advantages
Bone-tendon compression healing
Disadvantages
Tendon laceration or abrasion risk, technique-sensitive
Bone tunnels
Strength
Comparable to other implant-free constructs
Advantages
Low cost, no implant
Disadvantages
Tunnel or bridge fracture risk, traditionally two-incision
Distal biceps fixation methods
MethodStrengthAdvantagesDisadvantages
Cortical buttonHighest failure load in pooled cadaveric data (significantly stronger than a suture anchor)Immediate strength, allows early motion, single anterior incisionFar-cortex or PIN injury if the drill plunges, button prominence, cost
Suture anchorsSignificantly weaker than the cortical buttonFamiliar technique, no far-cortex drillingLower strength, may limit aggressive early loading
Interference screwIntermediate; adding a screw to a button does NOT increase strengthBone-tendon compression healingTendon laceration or abrasion risk, technique-sensitive
Bone tunnelsComparable to other implant-free constructsLow cost, no implantTunnel or bridge fracture risk, traditionally two-incision
Biomechanics — quote the ranking, not a single Newton value

In pooled cadaveric data the cortical button has the highest adjusted failure load and a lower risk of gap formation (type 2 failure) than interference screws or implant-free tunnels; suture anchors are significantly weaker than the button, and adding an interference screw to a button does not add strength. This biomechanical edge underpins early-motion rehabilitation and is why the cortical button is the most widely used construct internationally. Absolute failure loads vary widely between studies and specimens — quote the comparative ranking, not one Newton figure.

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation progresses in phases — the cortical button's biomechanical strength is what permits early motion. | Phase | Timing | Immobilisation | Therapy focus | |-------|--------|----------------|---------------| | Immediate | 0 to 2 weeks | Posterior splint, elbow at 90 degrees, forearm neutral to slight supination | Finger and wrist range of motion only | | Early | 2 to 6 weeks | Removable splint | Passive extension and active flexion out of the splint; avoid terminal extension beyond about 30 degrees; NO resisted supination | | Intermediate | 6 to 12 weeks | Splint for heavy tasks only | Isometric then light resisted strengthening; full range of motion; concentric then eccentric loading; sport-specific work begins | | Return to activity | 12 to 16 weeks and beyond | None | Graded return to function | - Light desk work: 2 to 4 weeks.

  • Light manual work: 6 to 8 weeks.
  • Heavy manual work: 12 to 16 weeks.
  • Full sport: 4 to 6 months. Expected outcome is 95 percent or better satisfaction with near-normal strength for acute repairs. Complications
LABCN injury
Recognition
Lateral forearm numbness or paraesthesia; a Tinel sign over the nerve
Prevention
Identify and protect early; careful retraction; avoid thermal injury
Management
Observation — most recover. Persistent painful neuroma: neurolysis or neurectomy
PIN injury
Recognition
Weakness of finger and thumb extension; partial wrist drop
Prevention
Full supination during all tuberosity work; avoid excessive retraction
Management
Observation 3 to 6 months (most recover); EMG at 3 months; exploration if no recovery
Heterotopic ossification
Recognition
Progressive stiffness and pain with motion, especially pronation and supination
Prevention
Single-incision technique; gentle tissue handling; consider indomethacin prophylaxis
Management
Observe if asymptomatic; surgical excision if symptomatic after maturation (12 months or more)
Proximal radioulnar synostosis
Recognition
Loss of pronation and supination; a bony block on imaging
Prevention
Single incision; avoid ulnar periosteal injury; gentle dissection
Management
Excision with interposition (fat, fascia) after maturation
Re-rupture
Recognition
Sudden weakness and pain; a palpable defect
Prevention
Adequate fixation; appropriate rehabilitation; avoid early loading
Management
Revision repair with graft if needed (acute: direct repair if possible)
Radial fracture
Recognition
Pain and deformity; fracture on X-ray
Prevention
Appropriate drill or socket size; avoid over-reaming; protect the cortex
Management
ORIF with plate fixation; bone graft as needed
Stiffness
Recognition
Loss of flexion or extension, especially loss of full extension
Prevention
Early range of motion; avoid over-tensioning
Management
Physiotherapy and splinting; rarely surgical release
Wound complications
Recognition
Infection, haematoma, dehiscence
Prevention
Meticulous haemostasis; layered closure; appropriate wound care
Management
Antibiotics, drainage and wound care as needed
Distal biceps repair complications — recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
LABCN injuryLateral forearm numbness or paraesthesia; a Tinel sign over the nerveIdentify and protect early; careful retraction; avoid thermal injuryObservation — most recover. Persistent painful neuroma: neurolysis or neurectomy
PIN injuryWeakness of finger and thumb extension; partial wrist dropFull supination during all tuberosity work; avoid excessive retractionObservation 3 to 6 months (most recover); EMG at 3 months; exploration if no recovery
Heterotopic ossificationProgressive stiffness and pain with motion, especially pronation and supinationSingle-incision technique; gentle tissue handling; consider indomethacin prophylaxisObserve if asymptomatic; surgical excision if symptomatic after maturation (12 months or more)
Proximal radioulnar synostosisLoss of pronation and supination; a bony block on imagingSingle incision; avoid ulnar periosteal injury; gentle dissectionExcision with interposition (fat, fascia) after maturation
Re-ruptureSudden weakness and pain; a palpable defectAdequate fixation; appropriate rehabilitation; avoid early loadingRevision repair with graft if needed (acute: direct repair if possible)
Radial fracturePain and deformity; fracture on X-rayAppropriate drill or socket size; avoid over-reaming; protect the cortexORIF with plate fixation; bone graft as needed
StiffnessLoss of flexion or extension, especially loss of full extensionEarly range of motion; avoid over-tensioningPhysiotherapy and splinting; rarely surgical release
Wound complicationsInfection, haematoma, dehiscenceMeticulous haemostasis; layered closure; appropriate wound careAntibiotics, drainage and wound care as needed

Nerve injury in more detail. The LABCN is the most commonly injured structure — an incidence of roughly 10 to 25 percent transient and 1 to 5 percent permanent, presenting as lateral forearm numbness and usually resolving with observation. PIN injury is far rarer (1 to 3 percent): it presents as finger and thumb extension weakness with preserved wrist extension (ECRL and ECRB are supplied more proximally), is protected by supination, and again most recover with observation.

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

RUPTURERUPTURE — clinical features of a distal biceps rupture

R
Retracted muscle belly
Proximal 'Popeye' deformity
U
Unexpected 'pop'
With an eccentric load
P
Palpable defect
In the antecubital fossa
T
Tenderness and ecchymosis
Over the antecubital fossa
U
Unable to hook the tendon
Abnormal O'Driscoll hook test
R
Reduced supination power
30 to 40 percent strength loss
E
Eccentric extension against resistance
The precipitating mechanism
Mnemonic

BUTTONBUTTON — cortical button fixation steps

B
Biceps tendon whipstitched
With high-strength suture
U
Unicortical guide pin
Through the centre of the radial tuberosity
T
Through-and-through drilling
To the far cortex with the cannulated drill
T
Thread the button
Through the tendon eyelet
O
Over the far cortex
The button flips to lock — feel the 'pop'
N
Nest and tension the tendon
Dock into the socket at 30 to 40 degrees flexion

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

“A 42-year-old manual labourer presents with pain and weakness 24 hours after feeling a 'pop' in his elbow while lifting. You cannot hook your finger under the biceps tendon. How do you manage this patient?”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

“Explain why forearm supination is critical during distal biceps repair and how it protects the posterior interosseous nerve.”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“A patient develops complete loss of finger and thumb extension two weeks after a distal biceps repair. How do you assess and manage this?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Distal biceps tendon repair — exam-day essentials

Clinical features

  • A 'pop' in the antecubital fossa on eccentric loading
  • Hook test (O'Driscoll): cannot hook the tendon equals complete rupture
  • Supination weakness greater than flexion weakness
  • Ecchymosis and a palpable defect in the antecubital fossa

Critical technical points

  • Full supination protects the PIN — maintain it through all tuberosity work
  • Identify the LABCN early — the most commonly injured nerve
  • Cortical button is the strongest construct biomechanically
  • Tension at 30 to 40 degrees flexion — should allow full extension

Structures at risk

  • LABCN — superficial, crosses the field, most common injury
  • PIN — protected by supination, at risk in pronation
  • Radial artery — retract medially
  • Radial recurrent vessels (leash of Henry) — cauterise

Timing

  • Acute (less than 4 weeks): primary repair, best outcomes
  • Subacute (4 to 8 weeks): more dissection, possible shortening
  • Chronic (greater than 8 weeks): often needs graft reconstruction

Single versus two incision

  • Single: lower HO and synostosis risk, the preferred default
  • Two-incision: more anatomic footprint, higher HO risk
  • Broadly equivalent functional outcomes
  • The Morrey muscle-splitting modification reduces HO

Exam tips

  • The hook test is the most specific clinical sign
  • Untreated loss is 30 to 40 percent supination, 10 to 20 percent flexion
  • Supination is the key safety manoeuvre — know why
  • Cortical button is strongest; suture anchor weaker; button plus screw no stronger than button alone

Background & Evidence


Epidemiology and mechanism. A distal biceps rupture typically occurs in an active, middle-aged patient under an eccentric load — a sudden extension force against a contracting, flexed-supinated biceps, felt as the classic 'pop' in the antecubital fossa. Complete avulsion produces the strength deficit that defines the condition: about 30 to 40 percent of supination and 10 to 20 percent of flexion, because the biceps is the forearm's most powerful supinator and a secondary elbow flexor. A partial tear produces a lesser, activity-related deficit. Classification by timing. The practical classification that drives management is time from injury, because the tendon retracts and stiffens:

Acute
Timing
Less than 4 weeks
Typical operative implication
Straightforward primary repair — best outcomes
Subacute
Timing
4 to 8 weeks
Typical operative implication
More dissection needed, possible tendon shortening; primary repair often still possible
Chronic
Timing
Greater than 8 weeks
Typical operative implication
Retracted and stiff — often requires graft reconstruction (Achilles, hamstring)
Timing classification of distal biceps rupture
StageTimingTypical operative implication
AcuteLess than 4 weeksStraightforward primary repair — best outcomes
Subacute4 to 8 weeksMore dissection needed, possible tendon shortening; primary repair often still possible
ChronicGreater than 8 weeksRetracted and stiff — often requires graft reconstruction (Achilles, hamstring)

References


Evidence

Single versus double-incision technique for repair of acute distal biceps tendon ruptures: a randomized clinical trial

Level I
Grewal R, Athwal GS, MacDermid JC, Faber KJ, Drosdowech DS, El-Hawary R, King GJW • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2012)
Key Findings:
  • 91 patients randomized: single-incision with two suture anchors (n=47) vs double-incision with transosseous tunnels (n=44)
  • No difference in ASES, DASH or PREE scores at 2 years; double-incision had a 10% advantage in final isometric flexion strength (104% vs 94%, p=0.01)
  • Single-incision had significantly more transient LABCN neurapraxias (19/47 vs 3/43, p less than 0.001)
  • Four reruptures, all attributable to early reinjury or noncompliance rather than fixation type
Clinical implication: Both approaches give equivalent patient-reported outcomes at 2 years. The trade-off is more LABCN neurapraxia with the single anterior incision versus a small flexion-strength edge for the two-incision technique.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 22760383)
Evidence

Repair techniques for acute distal biceps tendon ruptures: a systematic review

Level IV
Watson JN, Moretti VM, Schwindel L, Hutchinson MR • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2014)
Key Findings:
  • 22 studies, 498 elbows; overall complication rate 24.5%
  • Complication rate 23.9% one-incision vs 25.7% two-incision (p=0.32, not significant)
  • By fixation: cortical button 0%, bone tunnels 20.4%, suture anchors 26.4%, intraosseous screws 44.8%; button and tunnels significantly lower than screws
  • LABCN neurapraxia was the most common complication overall (9.6%)
Clinical implication: Number of incisions does not drive overall complication rate; choice of fixation does. Cortical button and bone tunnels are safer than intraosseous interference screws.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 25520343)
Evidence

Complications of distal biceps tendon repair: a meta-analysis of single-incision versus double-incision surgical technique

Level IV
Amin NH, Volpi A, Lynch TS, Patel RM, Cerynik DL, Schickendantz MS, Jones MH • Orthop J Sports Med (2016)
Key Findings:
  • 87 articles pooled by surgical approach
  • LABCN neurapraxia was the most common complication of single-incision repair (77/785, 9.8%)
  • Heterotopic ossification was the most common complication of double-incision repair (36/498, 7.2%)
  • Overall reported complication frequency, including rerupture and nerve injury, was higher for single-incision; HO was higher for double-incision
Clinical implication: Counsel patients on approach-specific risk profiles: nerve neurapraxia predominates with the anterior single incision, heterotopic ossification with the two-incision technique.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 27766276)
Evidence

Optimizing fixation for distal biceps tendon repairs: a systematic review and meta-regression of cadaveric biomechanical testing

Level IV
Taylor AL, Bansal A, Shi BY, Best MJ, Huish EG, Srikumaran U • Am J Sports Med (2021)
Key Findings:
  • 14 cadaveric biomechanical studies pooled by meta-regression of adjusted failure load
  • Cortical button had the highest adjusted failure load; suture anchor was significantly weaker than cortical button (difference 154 N, 95% CI 30-279)
  • Adding an interference screw to a cortical button did NOT increase failure load
  • Cortical button carried lower odds of type 2 (gap) failure than screws or implant-free tunnels; a locking stitch added 113 N but raised type 2 failure odds
Clinical implication: Cortical button is the biomechanically strongest construct with the lowest gap-formation risk, supporting early active rehabilitation; supplementing it with an interference screw is unnecessary.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 33596088)
Evidence

The hook test for distal biceps tendon avulsion

Level II
O'Driscoll SW, Goncalves LBJ, Dietz P • Am J Sports Med (2007)
Key Findings:
  • 45 patients undergoing surgical exploration; hook test performed at 90 degrees flexion with active supination
  • Abnormal hook test in 33/33 complete avulsions and intact in all 12 partial tears
  • Sensitivity and specificity both 100%, exceeding MRI (sensitivity 92%, specificity 85%)
  • A painful but intact hook test suggested a partial tear in 9/12 partial cases
Clinical implication: The hook test is the single most reliable bedside test for complete distal biceps avulsion and outperforms MRI — a normal hook test effectively excludes a complete tear.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 17687121)
Evidence

Repair of the ruptured distal biceps tendon: a systematic review

Level IV
Chavan PR, Duquin TR, Bisson LJ • Am J Sports Med (2008)
Verify source (DOI)

An early systematic review of distal biceps repair techniques and their complications, establishing the complication profile that later meta-analyses refined.

Evidence

Repair of distal biceps tendon rupture: a new technique using the Endobutton

Technique
Bain GI, Prem H, Heptinstall RJ, Verhellen R, Paix D • J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2000)

The original description of single-incision distal biceps repair with the cortical Endobutton — the construct that became the biomechanical and clinical benchmark.

Evidence

Outcomes and patient satisfaction of delayed distal biceps repairs without graft augmentation: a systematic review

Level IV
Tzeuton S, Johns W, Campbell B, Hammoud S, Ciccotti MG, Namdari S • JBJS Rev (2023)
Key Findings:
  • Pooled delayed repairs performed without graft augmentation showed good patient satisfaction and range of motion
  • Only a mildly higher rate of transient LABCN palsy compared with acute repair
  • Supports direct primary repair of selected chronic tears where tendon excursion and quality are adequate, rather than routine grafting
Verify source (DOI)
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
40 min
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
intermediate
Read time
40 min
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Anterior Approach to the Elbow (Antecubital)
Browse all procedures