Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture

Operative SurgeryTrauma
TraumaIntermediateCore Procedure

Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture

Comprehensive surgical technique guide for cemented hip hemiarthroplasty in displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures — the posterior (Moore/Southern) exposure step by step, third-generation cementing, enhanced soft-tissue repair, and the hemi-versus-THA decision. advanced orthopaedic operative-surgery guide.

Procedure console
55 min
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Cemented hemiarthroplasty · Displaced intracapsular (Garden III/IV) fracture in the low-demand elderly · Posterior (Moore/Southern) approach

Displaced intracapsularGarden III/IV in the low-demand elderly
Within 36 hrsTarget time to surgery
Cemented stemThe standard — WHiTE 5 and the registries
60-90 minTypical operative duration
Critical Must-Knows
  • The classic patient is elderly (over 70), low-demand or cognitively impaired, with a displaced intracapsular (Garden III or IV) femoral neck fracture and a normal acetabulum. The hemi-versus-THA decision turns on pre-injury mobility, cognition and life expectancy.
  • Use a CEMENTED stem. WHiTE 5 (NEJM 2022) and the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register show cemented fixation gives better early quality of life and far fewer periprosthetic fractures than uncemented, with no mortality difference.
  • Third-generation cementing — restrictor, pulsatile lavage, retrograde gun, pressurisation — together with anaesthetic communication prevents Bone Cement Implantation Syndrome (BCIS).
  • Enhanced posterior soft-tissue repair (capsule plus short external rotator reattachment through bone) cuts dislocation from 5-10 percent down to 1-2 percent.
  • Surgery within 36 hours with orthogeriatric co-management reduces mortality. 30-day mortality is 5-8 percent and 1-year mortality 20-30 percent, reflecting the frailty of the population rather than the procedure.

When & Why


Indication. A displaced intracapsular femoral neck fracture (Garden III or IV) in an elderly, low-demand patient in whom the native femoral head cannot be reliably saved and the acetabulum is healthy. The operation replaces the femoral head and neck with a stem that articulates directly with the native acetabulum, restoring a stable, painless hip for immediate weight-bearing. Absolute indications:

  • Displaced intracapsular femoral neck fracture in an elderly patient (typically over 70 years)
  • Low functional demand — walks with aids, limited community ambulation
  • Cognitive impairment (dementia), making compliance with hip precautions unreliable
  • Limited life expectancy (under 5-10 years)
  • Significant medical comorbidities favouring a shorter operative time
  • No pre-existing acetabular arthritis on imaging Relative indications:
  • Undisplaced fractures (Garden I or II) in the very elderly with severe osteoporosis, where fixation is likely to fail
  • Pathological fractures from metastatic disease (palliative hemiarthroplasty)
  • Failed internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture (salvage)
  • An elderly patient with rheumatoid arthritis and poor bone quality The one decision that matters — hemi, THA, or fixation. Every displaced fracture in an older patient must be matched to the patient, not the X-ray:
Hemiarthroplasty

The default for the low-demand, cognitively impaired elderly patient. Cemented stem, faster than THA, no acetabular preparation. The HEALTH trial showed no reoperation benefit to THA and more dislocation with THA.

Total hip arthroplasty

Reserved for the active, cognitively intact patient who walked independently outdoors with no more than a stick, with good life expectancy and a normal acetabulum. Better best-case function, but higher dislocation.

Internal fixation

Reserved for the young (physiological age under 65) and for undisplaced (Garden I or II) fractures. Fixation failure in displaced elderly fractures runs at around 20-40 percent, which is exactly why arthroplasty dominates this population.

Total hip arthroplasty is preferred over hemiarthroplasty when the patient is active with independent community ambulation, is cognitively intact with a life expectancy over 10 years, is younger (around 60-70) with a displaced fracture, or has pre-existing acetabular arthritis or an inflammatory arthropathy.

Use shared decision-making — the HEALTH trial

The HEALTH trial (NEJM 2019, 1,495 independently ambulating patients) found NO significant difference in secondary hip procedures at 24 months (7.9 percent THA vs 8.3 percent hemi, HR 0.95, p=0.79) and only a clinically unimportant functional advantage for THA, while dislocation or instability was HIGHER with THA (4.7 percent vs 2.4 percent). Reserve THA for active, cognitively intact patients; otherwise hemiarthroplasty is faster, simpler, and at least as good.

Contraindications. Absolute: active sepsis or local infection, medical instability precluding surgery, or a palliative patient with very limited life expectancy (comfort measures only). Relative: severe osteoporosis with concern for periprosthetic fracture (usually still proceed), anticoagulation that cannot be reversed (delay if possible), and significant cardiac disease raising BCIS risk (consider uncemented). Pre-operative optimisation and timing. The target is surgery on the day of, or the day after, admission, and within 36-48 hours (NICE NG124). Registry data across the UK NHFD, Norwegian, Swedish and Australian or New Zealand audits consistently associate surgery beyond 48 hours with increased mortality. Delay only for a clear reversible problem — anaemia requiring transfusion, fluid or electrolyte derangement, reversible coagulopathy, uncontrolled diabetes or arrhythmia — and do NOT delay for non-correctable comorbidities or minor abnormalities. Every patient gets early orthogeriatric review, a comprehensive geriatric assessment, and delirium prevention. Anticoagulation and transfusion. For warfarin, target an INR under 1.5 (vitamin K with or without prothrombin complex). Withhold DOACs for 24-48 hours depending on renal function. Continue aspirin (no increased bleeding risk in hip fracture) and balance clopidogrel against delay (often proceed). Transfuse to a haemoglobin over 80 g/L for most patients, or over 100 g/L with significant cardiac disease — the FOCUS trial showed no benefit to a liberal transfusion strategy.

Delay increases mortality

Across national hip-fracture audits a substantial minority of patients still wait longer than 48 hours for surgery. Delayed surgery is associated with increased 30-day mortality, pressure injuries, pneumonia and delirium. Advocate strongly for timely surgery and orthogeriatric co-management.

Implant selection. A CEMENTED stem is the recommended standard for elderly hip-fracture patients (NICE NG124, Cochrane, multiple national registries): WHiTE 5 showed better quality of life at 4 months and far fewer periprosthetic fractures (0.5 percent vs 2.1 percent) with cement, and the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register (n=30,178) showed uncemented fixation carried 1.5 times the reoperation risk and 5.1 times the periprosthetic-fracture risk with no mortality difference. Consider UNCEMENTED only for significant cardiopulmonary disease or pulmonary hypertension (BCIS risk), previous BCIS, or a very narrow or sclerotic canal where cementing is impractical. Bipolar versus unipolar head choice shows no difference in acetabular erosion, pain or function (Cochrane) — most surgeons use bipolar but unipolar is equally acceptable. Stem options include a collared stem (prevents subsidence, loads the calcar), a polished tapered stem such as the Exeter (subsides into the mantle), or a composite-beam stem designed for cement fixation. Consent. Counsel the family honestly: this is a major operation with 5-8 percent 30-day mortality and 20-30 percent 1-year mortality that reflects the frailty of the population. Discuss dislocation (1-5 percent), bone cement implantation syndrome, periprosthetic fracture, infection (1-2 percent), DVT or PE, and the need for extended VTE prophylaxis. For patients with dementia, acknowledge that hip precautions will be difficult to maintain. Around 60-70 percent return to their pre-fracture mobility level.

The Operation


The goal: through the posterior (Moore or Southern) approach, expose the hip through a true internervous plane, remove the fractured head and neck, prepare and cement the femoral canal with third-generation technique, insert a well-sized stem and head articulating with a healthy acetabulum, and then perform an enhanced posterior soft-tissue repair that protects against dislocation. The exposure — laid out in steps 1 to 5 below — is the heart of the operation and is described in depth on the posterior approach to the hip page.

Hip hemiarthroplasty
Hip hemiarthroplasty for a displaced femoral neck fracture: a femoral component articulating with the native acetabulum.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Operative sequence — posterior (Moore/Southern) approach

Step 1Positioning and preparation
  • Lateral decubitus, affected side up, secured in a beanbag or dedicated hip positioner; the pelvis must be stable or version will be wrong.
  • Prep from iliac crest to below the knee; drape the limb free to allow manipulation.
  • Axillary roll for the brachial plexus; pad every bony prominence (head or face, fibular head for the common peroneal nerve, malleoli, genitalia in males). Elderly patients with thin skin are especially vulnerable.
  • Confirm antibiotic prophylaxis (cefazolin 2 g IV within 60 minutes of incision) and document all padding before draping.
Step 2Landmarks and skin incision
  • Palpate the landmarks: the greater trochanter (the key landmark), the posterior superior iliac spine (the incision curves toward it), the gluteal fold (inferior extent of gluteus maximus), and the femoral shaft axis.
  • Curvilinear incision centred on the greater trochanter, extending 8-10 cm distally along the femoral shaft and curving 6-8 cm proximally toward the PSIS.
Step 3Superficial dissection — the internervous plane
  • Incise skin and subcutaneous tissue, then the fascia lata in line with the incision.
  • Split gluteus maximus in line with its fibres. This is a TRUE internervous plane — superior gluteal nerve above, inferior gluteal nerve below — so no muscle is denervated.
  • Never extend the proximal dissection more than 5 cm above the greater trochanter tip: the superior gluteal nerve runs on the deep surface of gluteus medius beyond that point.
Step 4Deep exposure — short external rotators and sciatic nerve
  • Retract gluteus maximus to expose the short external rotators. From superior to inferior: piriformis, superior gemellus, obturator internus, inferior gemellus, and quadratus femoris (most inferior, lying on the lesser trochanter).
  • The sciatic nerve lies 2-3 cm posterior to the posterior acetabular wall; it emerges below piriformis in about 90 percent and through piriformis in about 10 percent. Visualise or palpate it BEFORE placing retractors.
  • Place the posterior retractor on BONE (the ischium), never in soft tissue. Keep the hip and knee flexed to relax the nerve and limit retraction time.
Step 5Capsulotomy and dislocation
  • Tag and then detach the short external rotators (piriformis and the conjoint tendon) from their femoral insertion, preserving the tags for later repair.
  • Perform a T-capsulotomy or a posterior longitudinal capsulotomy; tag the capsule too — it is an important posterior stabiliser.
  • Internally rotate and flex the hip to dislocate. The fractured head usually remains in the acetabulum, still attached to the ligamentum teres, and may need to be levered out with a bone hook.
Step 6Femoral head removal, sizing and acetabular assessment
  • Extract the femoral head with a corkscrew or bone hook.
  • Measure the head diameter with the sizing gauge — typically 38-58 mm, most commonly 46-50 mm. This directly determines the prosthetic head size.
  • Inspect the acetabulum carefully. Normal cartilage — proceed with hemiarthroplasty. Exposed bone, osteophytes or rheumatoid protrusion — reconsider conversion to total hip arthroplasty. This decision point must be discussed with the family pre-operatively.
Step 7Femoral neck osteotomy
  • Cut the femoral neck at the templated level, typically 1-1.5 cm above the lesser trochanter.
  • Preserve the calcar femorale for collar seating. Use the oscillating saw with copious irrigation and soft-tissue protection, perpendicular to the femoral neck axis.
  • Too high a cut leaves insufficient calcar support and risks subsidence; too low risks a calcar fracture or intraoperative fracture.
Step 8Femoral canal preparation
  • Open the canal with a box chisel or starter awl, aiming laterally to avoid varus.
  • Ream or broach sequentially to the templated size — never skip sizes. Maintain 10-15 degrees of anteversion matching native femoral version.
  • The broach must be stable with no toggle. Any crack heard means STOP, assess for fracture, and be ready to cable or cerclage.
Step 9Trial reduction
  • Insert the trial stem and a trial head matching the measured size and reduce the hip.
  • Assess stability — for the posterior approach, test in flexion with internal rotation (it should require at least 90 degrees flexion and 45 degrees internal rotation to dislocate).
  • Check leg length (knees together, heels level, compared with the contralateral side) and soft-tissue tension with a shuck test. If unstable, use a larger head (greater jump distance) or a higher offset before accepting strict precautions.
Step 10Third-generation cementing (the standard in the elderly)
  1. Place a cement restrictor 2 cm distal to the planned stem tip.
  2. Pulsatile lavage to remove fat, marrow and debris.
  3. Dry the canal with swabs and suction.
  4. Vacuum-mix high-viscosity cement (e.g. Simplex P or Palacos) to the doughy phase.
  5. Fill retrograde with a cement gun from the restrictor proximally.
  6. Maintain digital or mechanical pressurisation during filling.
  7. Insert the stem slowly with controlled pressure, and keep pressurising until the cement cures.
  • This achieves 2-4 mm of cement interdigitation into cancellous bone and reduces radiolucent lines and aseptic loosening.
  • Warn the anaesthetist BEFORE cementing; have vasopressors and resuscitation ready (see the BCIS alert below).
Step 11Final implantation
  • Insert the definitive stem and hold position until the cement is fully cured.
  • For a bipolar head, assemble the inner head to the stem taper, then the outer shell, and confirm the locking mechanism is engaged (audible or visual click). For a unipolar head, seat the single head component.
  • Reduce the hip and repeat the stability, leg-length and tension checks from the trial. Document all component sizes (stem, head diameter, neck length).
Step 12Enhanced posterior soft-tissue repair
  • Repair the posterior capsule with strong suture (e.g. number 2 Ethibond or FiberWire).
  • Reattach the short external rotators (piriformis and conjoint tendon) to their femoral insertion through drill holes in the greater trochanter or by a trans-osseous technique.
  • This enhanced repair reduces dislocation from 5-10 percent down to 1-2 percent and should be standard for every posterior approach hemiarthroplasty.
Step 13Closure
  • Copious irrigation (1-2 litres saline) and meticulous haemostasis.
  • Close the fascia lata over gluteus maximus with a strong absorbable suture (e.g. 0 Vicryl) — this is the strength layer. Optional drain depending on bleeding and anticoagulation.
  • Subcutaneous absorbable suture to obliterate dead space; skin with staples or a subcuticular suture and a sterile waterproof dressing.
  • Order a post-operative radiograph in recovery before leaving theatre.
Stay in the safe zone — the superior gluteal nerve

The superior gluteal nerve exits the greater sciatic notch ABOVE piriformis and runs on the deep surface of gluteus medius. It is at risk if the dissection extends more than 5 cm proximal to the tip of the greater trochanter — this is the "safe zone" limit, and violating it causes abductor weakness and a Trendelenburg gait.

Bone Cement Implantation Syndrome (BCIS)

BCIS presents during or shortly after cementing as hypotension, hypoxia, arrhythmia or cardiovascular collapse from embolisation of fat, marrow and cement. Prevent it with pulsatile lavage, a cement restrictor, slow controlled stem insertion, and clear communication with the anaesthetist before cementing. If it occurs: stop, give 100 percent oxygen, fluids and vasopressors, and commence CPR if there is cardiovascular collapse. Consider an uncemented stem in patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease, pulmonary hypertension, or previous BCIS.

Sciatic nerve

The major danger of the posterior approach. Lies 2-3 cm posterior to the posterior acetabular wall, emerging below piriformis. Transient injury in 0.5-2 percent. Protect it by flexing the hip and knee to relax the nerve, placing the posterior retractor on the ischium, and limiting retraction time.

Superior gluteal nerve

Motor to gluteus medius and minimus. Exits the greater sciatic notch 3-5 cm above the greater trochanter tip. Protect it by never extending the incision or dissection more than 5 cm proximal to the trochanter tip.

Inferior gluteal vessels

Emerge below piriformis with the sciatic nerve and course to gluteus maximus. Stay within the safe zone above piriformis, or clearly below it with direct visualisation.

Femoral vessels

Lie anteromedial to the hip joint in the femoral triangle, around 4-5 cm anterior to the capsule. Keep the anterior retractor on bone only and never let it slide medially into soft tissue.

Enhanced posterior repair is mandatory

Always tag the capsule and the short external rotators with stay sutures BEFORE detaching them. Without tags, an anatomical repair is impossible. Enhanced repair — capsule plus short external rotator reattachment through bone with strong non-absorbable suture — is evidence-based and reduces dislocation from 5-10 percent to 1-2 percent. It is worth the extra minute.

Varus and the calcar

Start canal preparation lateral to avoid varus — a varus stem increases fracture risk and gives poor outcomes. Ream or broach sequentially, never skipping sizes, and stop at any crack to assess for fracture. A correctly placed neck cut (1-1.5 cm above the lesser trochanter) preserves the calcar for collar support; too high risks subsidence and too low risks a calcar fracture.

Aftercare & Complications


Immediate post-operative care and mobilisation | Phase | Timing | Weight-bearing and precautions | Therapy | |-------|--------|-------------------------------|---------| | 1 | Day 0-1 | Full weight-bearing as tolerated; sit out of bed | Stand and walk with a frame | | 2 | Weeks 1-6 | Hip precautions (posterior): avoid flexion over 90 degrees, adduction past midline, internal rotation | Gait training, transfers, stairs | | 3 | Weeks 6-12 | Precautions continue (difficult in dementia) | Progressive independence | | 4 | Beyond 12 weeks | Return to function | Discharge to physiotherapy only if needed | - Full weight-bearing from Day 1 — there are no restrictions on loading a cemented hemiarthroplasty.

  • VTE prophylaxis: LMWH or a DOAC for an extended duration of around 28-35 days (NICE NG89, AAOS), plus mechanical prophylaxis until mobile. Tranexamic acid intra-operatively if not contraindicated.
  • Orthogeriatric co-management continues for medical optimisation, delirium prevention and discharge planning.
  • Follow-up: radiograph before discharge, wound check at 2 weeks, review at 6 weeks with radiographs, then only if symptomatic. Red flags: increasing pain after initial improvement (infection or dislocation), wound discharge or erythema, fever, or new inability to weight-bear. Complications
Dislocation (1-5%)
Recognition
Sudden pain, leg shortened and externally rotated (posterior), unable to bear weight
Prevention
Enhanced posterior repair, correct component version, hip precautions, larger head
Management
Closed reduction under sedation; if recurrent, revise component position or use a constrained liner
Bone cement implantation syndrome (1-2% significant)
Recognition
Hypotension, hypoxia, arrhythmia or reduced consciousness during or after cementing; may be fatal (0.1%)
Prevention
Lavage, restrictor, slow insertion, anaesthetic communication; consider uncemented in high-risk
Management
Stop, 100% oxygen, fluids, vasopressors, cardiac support; often needs ICU
Periprosthetic fracture (1-3%)
Recognition
Intraoperative crack during broaching or insertion; postoperative fall with acute pain
Prevention
Avoid varus broaching, sequential sizing, cable or cerclage an intraoperative crack
Management
Vancouver classification guides treatment: B1 plate and cables; B2 or B3 revision stem
Infection (1-2%)
Recognition
Wound erythema, discharge, fever, raised CRP or ESR; may present late
Prevention
Perioperative antibiotics, laminar flow, sterile technique, haemostasis
Management
Superficial: antibiotics. Deep: DAIR if early (under 3 weeks) or two-stage revision if late
DVT or PE (1-3%)
Recognition
Calf swelling, pain or cord; PE: dyspnoea, pleuritic chest pain, hypoxia
Prevention
Chemical prophylaxis for around 28-35 days, early mobilisation, mechanical prophylaxis
Management
Therapeutic anticoagulation; IVC filter if anticoagulation contraindicated
Acetabular erosion (10-20% at 10 years)
Recognition
Gradual groin pain and declining mobility over years; radiographic protrusion
Prevention
Match the native femoral head size; avoid oversizing
Management
Conversion to THA with acetabular reconstruction
Leg-length discrepancy
Recognition
Patient awareness of a difference, altered gait, back pain
Prevention
Templating, intraoperative measurement, modular components
Management
Shoe raise if under 2 cm and symptomatic; revision rarely indicated
Sciatic nerve injury (0.5-2%)
Recognition
Foot drop, sensory loss in the posterior leg or foot, weak ankle dorsiflexion
Prevention
Careful retractor placement, hip and knee flexed, limit retraction time
Management
Most are neuropraxic: observe and splint; EMG at 6 weeks; recovery may take 12-18 months
Hemiarthroplasty complications — recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
Dislocation (1-5%)Sudden pain, leg shortened and externally rotated (posterior), unable to bear weightEnhanced posterior repair, correct component version, hip precautions, larger headClosed reduction under sedation; if recurrent, revise component position or use a constrained liner
Bone cement implantation syndrome (1-2% significant)Hypotension, hypoxia, arrhythmia or reduced consciousness during or after cementing; may be fatal (0.1%)Lavage, restrictor, slow insertion, anaesthetic communication; consider uncemented in high-riskStop, 100% oxygen, fluids, vasopressors, cardiac support; often needs ICU
Periprosthetic fracture (1-3%)Intraoperative crack during broaching or insertion; postoperative fall with acute painAvoid varus broaching, sequential sizing, cable or cerclage an intraoperative crackVancouver classification guides treatment: B1 plate and cables; B2 or B3 revision stem
Infection (1-2%)Wound erythema, discharge, fever, raised CRP or ESR; may present latePerioperative antibiotics, laminar flow, sterile technique, haemostasisSuperficial: antibiotics. Deep: DAIR if early (under 3 weeks) or two-stage revision if late
DVT or PE (1-3%)Calf swelling, pain or cord; PE: dyspnoea, pleuritic chest pain, hypoxiaChemical prophylaxis for around 28-35 days, early mobilisation, mechanical prophylaxisTherapeutic anticoagulation; IVC filter if anticoagulation contraindicated
Acetabular erosion (10-20% at 10 years)Gradual groin pain and declining mobility over years; radiographic protrusionMatch the native femoral head size; avoid oversizingConversion to THA with acetabular reconstruction
Leg-length discrepancyPatient awareness of a difference, altered gait, back painTemplating, intraoperative measurement, modular componentsShoe raise if under 2 cm and symptomatic; revision rarely indicated
Sciatic nerve injury (0.5-2%)Foot drop, sensory loss in the posterior leg or foot, weak ankle dorsiflexionCareful retractor placement, hip and knee flexed, limit retraction timeMost are neuropraxic: observe and splint; EMG at 6 weeks; recovery may take 12-18 months

Medical complications are common and reflect frailty: cardiac events (MI, arrhythmia) and respiratory complications (pneumonia, ARDS) each around 5-10 percent, delirium in 15-40 percent (especially with pre-existing cognitive impairment), pressure injuries 5-10 percent (reduced by early surgery), and urinary retention or UTI in 20-30 percent. 1-year mortality of 20-30 percent reflects the population, not the procedure.

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

CEMENTCEMENT — third-generation cementing technique

C
Canal restrictor
Placed 2 cm distal to the planned stem tip
E
Extensive lavage
Pulsatile jet lavage removes fat and debris
M
Medullary canal dried
Swabs and suction before cementing
E
Early cement mixing
Vacuum-mix high-viscosity cement to the doughy phase
N
Nozzle gun
Retrograde filling from the restrictor
T
Thumb pressure
Pressuriser maintained during insertion until cure
Mnemonic

HEMIHEMI — hemiarthroplasty versus THA decision

H
High-demand or cognitively intact
Consider total hip arthroplasty instead
E
Elderly (over 80), low-demand
Hemiarthroplasty is appropriate
M
Mobility limited pre-injury
Walker- or frame-dependent
I
Impaired cognition or limited life expectancy
Favours hemiarthroplasty

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

“An 85-year-old woman with a background of dementia falls in her nursing home. Radiographs show a displaced intracapsular femoral neck fracture (Garden IV). How would you manage her?”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

“During cementing of a hemiarthroplasty, the patient becomes hypotensive and oxygen saturations drop. What is happening and how do you manage it?”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

“How would you counsel a patient's family regarding the choice between hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for a displaced femoral neck fracture?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture — exam-day essentials

Indication

  • Displaced intracapsular fracture (Garden III or IV) in an elderly (over 70) patient
  • Low-demand or cognitively impaired; limited life expectancy
  • Normal acetabulum on imaging
  • THA preferred if active, cognitively intact, or acetabular arthritis

The decision

  • HEALTH (NEJM 2019): no reoperation difference; higher dislocation with THA
  • WHiTE 5 (NEJM 2022): cemented better QoL, fewer periprosthetic fractures
  • Norwegian register: uncemented 1.5x reoperation, 5.1x periprosthetic fracture
  • Cochrane: cemented less pain and better mobility; unipolar equals bipolar

Exposure (posterior)

  • True internervous plane through gluteus maximus (superior vs inferior gluteal nerve)
  • Short external rotators superior to inferior: piriformis, gemelli, obturator internus, quadratus femoris
  • Safe zone: never dissect more than 5 cm above the greater trochanter tip
  • Sciatic nerve: retract on the ischium, hip and knee flexed

Cementing (CEMENT)

  • Canal restrictor 2 cm distal to stem tip
  • Extensive pulsatile lavage, dry the canal
  • Retrograde gun, vacuum-mixed high-viscosity cement
  • Pressurise during insertion until cure; warn the anaesthetist first

Enhanced posterior repair

  • Always repair capsule AND short external rotators
  • Reduces dislocation from 5-10 percent to 1-2 percent
  • Tag structures before cutting; strong suture through drill holes in the trochanter

BCIS

  • Hypotension, hypoxia, collapse during or after cementing
  • Prevent: lavage, restrictor, slow insertion, anaesthetic communication
  • Manage: stop, 100 percent oxygen, fluids, vasopressors, CPR if needed
  • Consider uncemented in severe cardiac disease or pulmonary hypertension

Aftercare

  • Full weight-bearing from Day 1
  • VTE prophylaxis for around 28-35 days
  • Hip precautions 6-12 weeks: no flexion over 90 degrees, no adduction, no internal rotation
  • Orthogeriatric co-management throughout

Danger structures

  • Sciatic nerve: 2-3 cm posterior to the acetabulum
  • Superior gluteal nerve: never dissect over 5 cm above the trochanter
  • Inferior gluteal vessels: below piriformis with the sciatic nerve
  • Femoral vessels: anteromedial — anterior retractor on bone only

Background & Evidence


Epidemiology. Femoral neck fractures are classic fragility fractures of the elderly. Around 60-70 percent of patients return to their pre-fracture mobility level after hemiarthroplasty, but most never regain full pre-fracture independence. 30-day mortality is 5-8 percent and 1-year mortality 20-30 percent across international hip-fracture registries — figures that reflect the frailty of the population rather than the operation itself. Long term, acetabular erosion develops in 10-20 percent at 10 years and around 5-10 percent require conversion to THA, although many patients do not survive long enough for this to matter. Garden classification of femoral neck fractures. This is the standard system used to grade displacement and guide management — undisplaced (Garden I or II) fractures are generally fixed, while displaced (Garden III or IV) fractures in the elderly are arthroplasty candidates.

I
Radiographic features
Incomplete or impacted valgus fracture
Stability
Stable
II
Radiographic features
Complete but undisplaced
Stability
Stable
III
Radiographic features
Complete, partially displaced (varus position)
Stability
Unstable
IV
Radiographic features
Complete, fully displaced with no trabecular continuity
Stability
Unstable
Garden classification
Garden gradeRadiographic featuresStability
IIncomplete or impacted valgus fractureStable
IIComplete but undisplacedStable
IIIComplete, partially displaced (varus position)Unstable
IVComplete, fully displaced with no trabecular continuityUnstable

Key randomised evidence. The HEALTH trial (NEJM 2019, 1,495 independently ambulating patients, 80 centres in 10 countries) found no significant difference in secondary hip procedures at 24 months (7.9 percent THA vs 8.3 percent hemi, HR 0.95, p=0.79) and only a clinically unimportant functional gain for THA, while dislocation or instability was higher with THA (4.7 percent vs 2.4 percent) and mortality similar (14.3 percent vs 13.1 percent). The WHiTE 5 trial (NEJM 2022, 1,225 patients aged 60 or over) found cemented hemiarthroplasty gave better EQ-5D quality of life at 4 months (0.371 vs 0.315, adjusted difference 0.055, p=0.02) and far fewer periprosthetic fractures (0.5 percent vs 2.1 percent, odds ratio 4.37 for uncemented). The FAITH trial (Lancet 2017) compared sliding hip screw with cancellous screws for fixation — a fixation question, not arthroplasty — and found no overall difference in reoperation, though the sliding hip screw was favoured in displaced or basicervical fractures and in smokers; the high failure rate of fixation in displaced elderly fractures (around 20-40 percent) underpins the move to arthroplasty. The Cochrane review (Parker 2010, 23 RCTs, 2,861 patients) found cemented prostheses gave less residual pain and better mobility than uncemented, no difference between unipolar and bipolar designs, and only a trend to better function with THA at the cost of higher dislocation. Registry evidence. The Norwegian Hip Fracture Register (30,178 bipolar hemiarthroplasties) showed uncemented fixation carried 1.5 times the overall reoperation risk and 5.1 times the periprosthetic-fracture risk, with no difference in 1-year mortality, pain or quality of life. Swedish, UK (NHFD) and Australian (AOANJRR) data are broadly concordant — higher early revision and periprosthetic fracture with uncemented hemiarthroplasty in the frail elderly. Approach-specific evidence. The posterior approach is faster with less blood loss and better abductor preservation than the lateral (Hardinge) approach, which has a lower dislocation rate but damages the abductors. Enhanced posterior repair — capsular repair plus short external rotator reattachment — reduces dislocation from 5-10 percent to 1-2 percent and should be standard for the posterior approach. Process-of-care benchmarks (UK NHFD, ANZHFR, Fragility Fracture Network): surgery within 36-48 hours of admission, orthogeriatric assessment for every patient, mobilisation on the first postoperative day, and bone-health assessment with falls prevention before discharge. NICE NG124 recommends operating on the day of or the day after admission, using cemented implants, offering THA only to patients who walked independently outdoors with no more than a stick and are cognitively intact, and using an anterolateral or posterior approach with capsular repair.

References


Evidence

Total Hip Arthroplasty or Hemiarthroplasty for Hip Fracture (HEALTH Trial)

1b
HEALTH Investigators; Bhandari M, Einhorn TA, Guyatt G, Schemitsch EH, et al. • New England Journal of Medicine (2019)
Key Findings:
  • 1,495 independently ambulating patients aged 50 or over with displaced femoral neck fracture, 80 centres in 10 countries
  • Secondary hip procedure at 24 months 7.9 percent (THA) vs 8.3 percent (hemi), HR 0.95, p=0.79 — not significant
  • Hip instability or dislocation higher with THA (4.7 percent vs 2.4 percent); function only marginally better with THA
  • Mortality similar (14.3 percent vs 13.1 percent)
Clinical implication: THA does not reduce reoperation versus hemiarthroplasty in this population and carries more dislocation; reserve THA for active, cognitively intact patients with longer life expectancy or acetabular disease.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 31557429)
Evidence

Cemented or Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Intracapsular Hip Fracture (WHiTE 5)

1b
Fernandez MA, Achten J, Parsons N, Griffin XL, Costa ML, et al. • New England Journal of Medicine (2022)
Key Findings:
  • 1,225 patients aged 60 or over with intracapsular fracture, cemented vs modern hydroxyapatite-coated uncemented hemiarthroplasty
  • EQ-5D quality of life at 4 months better with cement (0.371 vs 0.315; adjusted difference 0.055, p=0.02)
  • Periprosthetic fracture 0.5 percent (cemented) vs 2.1 percent (uncemented), odds ratio 4.37
  • Mortality at 12 months not significantly different (23.9 percent vs 27.8 percent)
Clinical implication: Cemented hemiarthroplasty gives better early quality of life and far fewer periprosthetic fractures — it should be the default in elderly intracapsular fractures.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 35139272)
Evidence

Cemented or Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture? Norwegian Hip Fracture Register

LoE 3
Kristensen TB, Dybvik E, Kristoffersen M, Dale H, Engesaeter LB, Furnes O, Gjertsen JE • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2020)
Key Findings:
  • 30,178 bipolar hemiarthroplasties (7,539 uncemented, 22,639 cemented), 2005-2017
  • Uncemented: higher overall reoperation risk (HRR 1.5) and periprosthetic-fracture reoperation (HRR 5.1)
  • No difference in 1-year mortality (HRR 1.0)
  • No difference in 1-year pain or quality-of-life PROMs
Clinical implication: Large-registry data corroborate the RCTs: uncemented hemiarthroplasty should not be used routinely in the elderly because of increased reoperation, with no mortality advantage.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 31855192)
Evidence

Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults (Cochrane)

1a
Parker MJ, Gurusamy KS, Azegami S • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2010)
Key Findings:
  • 23 randomised trials, 2,861 mainly elderly female patients
  • Cemented prostheses: less pain and better mobility than uncemented
  • Unipolar vs bipolar hemiarthroplasty: no significant difference in outcomes
  • THA: trend to better function than hemiarthroplasty but higher dislocation
Clinical implication: Provides the evidence base for cementing the stem and for treating unipolar and bipolar designs as functionally equivalent.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 20556753)
Evidence

Bone cement implantation syndrome

2a
Donaldson AJ, Thomson HE, Harper NJ, Kenny NW • British Journal of Anaesthesia (2009)
Key Findings:
  • Defines BCIS and its Donaldson severity grades (1 hypoxia or hypotension; 2 plus reduced consciousness; 3 cardiovascular collapse)
  • Caused by embolisation of fat, marrow and cement and a humoral or anaphylactoid response during pressurised cementing
  • Risk factors: cardiopulmonary disease, ASA 3-4, osteoporosis, long-stem or pathological cases
  • Risk reduced by lavage, restrictor, slow insertion, and selecting uncemented fixation in the highest-risk patients
Clinical implication: Frames recognition, grading and prevention of BCIS and underpins anaesthetic communication before cementing.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 19059919)
Evidence

Hip fracture: management (NG124)

Guideline
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) • NICE Guideline (2023)
Key Findings:
  • Operate on the day of, or the day after, admission
  • Use cemented implants for arthroplasty in hip fracture
  • Offer THA (rather than hemiarthroplasty) to patients who could walk independently outdoors with no more than a stick, are not cognitively impaired, and are medically fit
  • Use a proven femoral stem design and an anterolateral or posterior approach with capsular repair
Clinical implication: Provides the widely cited, internationally referenced guideline framework for timing, fixation, and the hemi-versus-THA decision.
Evidence

Hip arthroplasty for the treatment of displaced fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients

2a
Rogmark C, Leonardsson O • Bone and Joint Journal (2016)
Key Findings:
  • Review supporting arthroplasty over internal fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures in older patients
  • Internal fixation in displaced elderly fractures carries a high failure and reoperation rate
  • Arthroplasty gives more reliable pain relief and lower reoperation in this group
Clinical implication: Supports arthroplasty as the standard for displaced fractures in the elderly and frames the fixation-versus-arthroplasty choice.
Verify source (DOI)
Evidence

Fracture fixation in the operative management of hip fractures (FAITH)

1b
FAITH Investigators • Lancet (2017)
Key Findings:
  • International multicentre RCT of sliding hip screw vs cancellous screws for femoral neck fractures
  • No overall difference in reoperation
  • Sliding hip screw favoured in displaced or basicervical fractures and in smokers
  • A fixation trial — relevant because high fixation failure in displaced elderly fractures underpins the move to arthroplasty
Clinical implication: Frames fixation outcomes and explains why internal fixation is reserved for the young and for undisplaced fractures.
Verify source (DOI)
Evidence

Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) — Hip Arthroplasty Annual Report

Registry
Australian Orthopaedic Association (AOA) • AOANJRR Annual Report (2023)
Key Findings:
  • National registry reporting revision rates for hip arthroplasty by fixation, bearing and approach
  • Concordant with international data showing higher early revision with uncemented hemiarthroplasty in the frail elderly
  • Tracks implant survival and revision burden across the Australian population
Clinical implication: Registry benchmark supporting cemented fixation and standardised process-of-care in hip-fracture arthroplasty.
Evidence

Randomised comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty for displaced subcapital fractures of the femur

1b
Keating JF, Grant A, Masson M, Scott NW, Forbes JF • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) (2006)
Key Findings:
  • UK RCT comparing internal fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty and THA for displaced subcapital fractures
  • Arthroplasty gave better results than internal fixation in the elderly
  • THA gave better function than hemiarthroplasty but with more dislocation
Clinical implication: A landmark UK RCT supporting arthroplasty over fixation in displaced fractures — a precursor to the HEALTH question. Citation not independently re-verified against PubMed at time of edit.
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
55 min
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
intermediate
Read time
55 min
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Hip Posterior Approach (Moore/Southern)Hip Direct Lateral Approach (Hardinge)
Browse all procedures