Comprehensive guide to the anterior approach to the hip (Smith-Petersen) - indications, internervous plane, step-by-step technique, structures at risk, and surgical decision-making for orthopaedic fellowship exam
Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team
Orthopaedic clinicians and medical editors • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team
Internervous Plane | Femoral Nerve at Risk | Extensile for Acetabular Access
*/}
True internervous plane between TFL (superior gluteal nerve) and sartorius (femoral nerve). This makes the approach safe for extensive dissection without motor nerve injury risk. The interval is between rectus femoris medially and TFL laterally in the deep plane.
Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve crosses the surgical field lateral to medial. Injury causes meralgia paresthetica (anterolateral thigh numbness). Incidence 10-20%. Identify and protect or accept division with patient counseling.
The femoral nerve, artery, and vein lie medial to sartorius. Excessive medial retraction or prolonged retractor pressure risks femoral nerve stretch injury. Use self-retaining retractors carefully and release periodically.
Can be extended proximally with iliofemoral extension for full acetabular access (360 degrees). Requires detachment of external oblique from iliac crest and reflection of iliacus. Essential for acetabular fractures and complex reconstructions.
| Clinical Scenario | Indication Strength | Key Advantage | Main Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary THA (young, active) | Preferred by some surgeons | Muscle-sparing, faster recovery | Learning curve, LFCN injury |
| Acetabular fracture fixation | Gold standard for anterior column/wall | Full acetabular visualization with extension | Heterotopic ossification risk |
| DDH reconstruction (PAO, Pemberton) | Standard approach | Acetabular reorientation access | Need to protect LFCN in children |
| Hip arthrodesis | Historical indication | Wide exposure for fusion preparation | Rarely performed now |
Memory Hook:SARTOR is the tailor (sartorius muscle) who sits cross-legged - medial border of the interval. TAN is tensor - lateral border!
Memory Hook:The LFCN is Like Finding a Crossing Nerve - it crosses the operative field and is hard to see consistently!
Memory Hook:Keep retraction SAFE to protect the femoral nerve and vessels lying medially!
The Smith-Petersen anterior approach to the hip was first described by Marius Nygaard Smith-Petersen in 1917 for hip arthrodesis. It utilizes a true internervous plane between the tensor fasciae latae (superior gluteal nerve) and sartorius (femoral nerve), making it one of the safest approaches for extensive hip surgery.
Historical evolution:
Modern applications:
Why This Approach Matters
The anterior approach is the only true internervous plane approach to the hip. This anatomical advantage makes it safe for extensive dissection and explains its continued use for complex acetabular work despite the learning curve required.
Surface anatomy:
Deep structures:
Acetabular anatomy (for extensile exposure):
True Internervous Plane: The approach exploits the interval between the Tensor Fasciae Latae (myotome L4-S1) and the Sartorius (myotome L2-L3).
| Structure | Nerve Supply | Position | Function |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tensor fasciae latae (TFL) | Superior gluteal nerve (L4-S1) | Lateral border of interval | Hip flexion, abduction, internal rotation |
| Sartorius | Femoral nerve (L2-L3) | Medial border of interval | Hip flexion, external rotation (longest muscle) |
| Rectus femoris | Femoral nerve (L2-L4) | Deep to interval - between TFL and sartorius | Hip flexion, knee extension (crosses two joints) |
Approach Variants Classification:
| Variant | Key Feature | Primary Use | Modifications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classic Smith-Petersen | Curved incision from ASIS to GT | Acetabular fractures, PAO | Can extend iliofemoral |
| Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) | Longitudinal incision between ASIS-GT | Total hip arthroplasty | Minimally invasive variant |
| Hueter Approach | More medial interval emphasis | THA (historical) | Similar to DAA |
| Extended Iliofemoral | Proximal extension along iliac crest | Acetabular fractures | Full 360-degree access |
The approach variant chosen depends primarily on the indication and required exposure.
Preoperative Patient Selection:
Ideal candidates for anterior approach THA:
Physical examination findings:
Contraindications/caution:
Careful patient selection optimizes outcomes for anterior approach THA.
Imaging Assessment:
Standard views:
What to assess:
Indications:
Key information:
Additional Investigations:
| Investigation | Indication | Key Information |
|---|---|---|
| MRI hip | Osteonecrosis, labral pathology, soft tissue | Cartilage assessment, femoral head viability |
| CT angiography | Vascular injury concern (trauma) | Femoral/iliac vessel patency |
| Bone density (DEXA) | Osteoporosis screening (over 65) | Fracture risk, implant selection |
| EMG/NCS | Preoperative nerve dysfunction | Baseline for medicolegal purposes |
Preoperative Laboratory Studies:
Investigation Priority
For acetabular fractures, CT with 3D reconstruction is mandatory for surgical planning and approach selection. The Judet radiographs are useful for initial classification but CT provides the definitive assessment of fracture pattern, marginal impaction, and posterior wall integrity.

Decision Algorithm - Approach Selection:
THA: Consider DAA variant. Acetabular fracture: Smith-Petersen with extension. DDH reconstruction: Classic Smith-Petersen. Combined pathology: Plan extensile approach.
BMI and body habitus. Previous surgery and scarring. Bone quality and anatomy. Medical comorbidities. Expected compliance.
Learning curve consideration (DAA: 30-50 cases). Equipment availability (fracture table, specialized retractors). Team familiarity with approach. Backup plan if difficulties encountered.
Template implants (THA). Plate and screw selection (fracture). Fluoroscopy requirements. Table and positioning needs.
The decision pathway should systematically address all factors before committing to approach selection.
Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) for THA:
Ideal candidates:
Relative contraindications:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
This approach has gained significant popularity as the DAA for THA due to perceived faster recovery, though long-term outcomes are similar to other approaches.
Patient position: Supine
Positioning Advantages
Supine positioning is a major advantage of the anterior approach:
Palpable landmarks:
Incision options:
Standard Smith-Petersen (for acetabular work):
Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) for THA:
Keep incision lateral to the femoral pulse. Medial deviation risks injury to femoral neurovascular structures. Mark the femoral pulse before draping and plan incision lateral to this.
Primary risks:
Vascular:
Nerve:
Wound closure:
| Complication | Incidence | Prevention/Management |
|---|---|---|
| LFCN injury (meralgia paresthetica) | 10-20% (temporary or permanent) | Careful dissection, identify and protect, counsel preoperatively |
| Femoral nerve neuropraxia | 1-3% (usually temporary) | Avoid excessive medial retraction, release retractors periodically |
| Lateral circumflex femoral vessel injury | Common (manageable) | Identify and ligate ascending branch early in dissection |
| Proximal femoral fracture (THA) | 1-2% (learning curve dependent) | Careful broaching, fluoroscopy, avoid varus, extend wound if difficult |
| Heterotopic ossification (fracture) | 10-20% (higher for acetabular trauma) | Indomethacin prophylaxis or radiation, minimize soft tissue stripping |
| Wound infection | 1-2% (THA), 5-10% (trauma) | Standard prophylaxis, minimize tissue trauma, early antibiotics if suspected |
| Wound hematoma | 2-5% | Careful hemostasis, consider drain for trauma cases |
LFCN injury management:
Femoral nerve stretch injury:
Complication Counseling
Preoperative counseling should specifically mention:
Informed consent is particularly important for elective anterior approach THA given these specific risks.
Postoperative Protocol by Indication:
Day 0-1 (Immediate postoperative):
Day 1-14 (Early recovery):
Week 2-6 (Rehabilitation):
6 weeks and beyond:
The absence of hip precautions facilitates faster functional recovery compared to posterior approach.
No Hip Precautions - Anterior Advantage
Unlike posterior approach THA, anterior approach THA does not require hip precautions. Patients can flex, adduct, and internally rotate without restriction. This contributes to faster early recovery and improved patient satisfaction in the first 6 weeks.
Expected Outcomes by Indication:
| Indication | Success Rate | Key Metrics | Common Issues |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary THA | 95-98% at 10 years | HHS improvement 40-50 points, dislocation 0.6-1% | LFCN paresthesia 10-20% |
| Acetabular fracture ORIF | 70-90% anatomic reduction | Union 95%, post-traumatic OA 15-50% | HO 10-20%, nerve injury 2-5% |
| DDH open reduction | 85-95% stable reduction | AVN 0-5%, redislocation 5% | Residual dysplasia may need PAO |
| PAO for dysplasia | 85-90% good/excellent | Pain relief 85%, survivorship 90% at 10 years | Nerve injury 2%, nonunion rare |
THA Approach Comparison - Registry Data (AOANJRR 2023):
*/}
Key registry findings:
Prognosis Factors:
Long-term Considerations:
Evidence Summary
No approach is superior for THA when performed by experienced surgeons. The anterior approach offers lower dislocation rates and faster early recovery, but these advantages are offset by LFCN injury rates and learning curve complications. Registry data shows equivalent 10-year revision rates across all approaches.
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
"Describe the anterior approach to the hip (Smith-Petersen). What is the internervous plane and what structures are at risk?"
"You are performing a primary THA via the direct anterior approach. After femoral neck osteotomy, you are having difficulty accessing the femoral canal due to a muscular thigh. What are your options?"
"A patient returns 2 weeks after anterior approach THA with anterolateral thigh numbness and dysesthesia. What is the likely diagnosis and management?"
Internervous Plane Question
Q: What is the internervous plane in the Smith-Petersen anterior approach to the hip? A: Between tensor fasciae latae (supplied by superior gluteal nerve) and sartorius (supplied by femoral nerve). This is a true internervous plane with no motor nerve at risk within the interval.
Structure at Risk Question
Q: What is the most common nerve injury in anterior approach hip surgery and what are the symptoms? A: Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury occurs in 10-20% of cases. Symptoms are meralgia paresthetica: anterolateral thigh numbness and dysesthesia. This is a pure sensory nerve, so no motor weakness occurs.
Deep Anatomy Question
Q: What structure lies between the tensor fasciae latae and sartorius in the deep dissection and must be managed during exposure? A: Rectus femoris with its two heads (straight head from AIIS and reflected head from superior acetabular rim). The ascending branch of lateral circumflex femoral artery runs between rectus and TFL and must be ligated.
Indication Question
Q: What are the main indications for the Smith-Petersen anterior approach with iliofemoral extension? A: Acetabular fracture fixation (anterior column, both-column patterns), periacetabular osteotomy for DDH, and complex hip reconstruction. The extensile nature allows 360-degree acetabular visualization.
Complication Prevention Question
Q: How do you prevent femoral nerve injury during anterior approach hip surgery? A: The femoral nerve lies medial to the field deep to sartorius. Prevent injury by: (1) avoiding excessive medial retraction, (2) releasing self-retaining retractors periodically, (3) keeping dissection in the lateral interval, and (4) protecting during closure.
Local considerations:
Medicolegal considerations:
Equipment availability:
High-Yield Exam Summary