Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision β€” with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

Β© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Hip Anterior Approach (Smith-Petersen)

Operative SurgeryTrauma
TraumaAdvancedCore Procedure

Hip Anterior Approach (Smith-Petersen)

Comprehensive guide to the anterior approach to the hip (Smith-Petersen) - indications, internervous plane, step-by-step technique, structures at risk, and surgical decision-making for orthopaedic fellowship exam

Procedure console
25 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Internervous Plane | Femoral Nerve at Risk | Extensile for Acetabular Access

TFL–SartoriusInterval: TFL (sup. gluteal) vs Sartorius (femoral)
LFCNLateral femoral cutaneous nerve at risk
360Β°Full acetabular access possible
DDHIdeal for developmental dysplasia surgery
Critical Must-Knows
  • Internervous plane between tensor fasciae latae (superior gluteal nerve) and sartorius (femoral nerve) β€” a true internervous plane, safe for extensive dissection.
  • The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve crosses the field and is the structure most often injured, producing meralgia paraesthetica in 10–20% of cases.
  • An extensile approach β€” it can be extended with the iliofemoral extension for full 360-degree acetabular access.
  • Supine positioning allows simultaneous bilateral procedures, easier anaesthesia, and no hip precautions after THA.
  • The femoral nerve and vessels lie medial to sartorius β€” excessive medial retraction risks a stretch neuropraxia.

When & Why


What it exposes. The Smith-Petersen anterior approach gives direct access to the anterior hip capsule, femoral neck and acetabular rim, and β€” with the iliofemoral extension β€” to the entire acetabulum (anterior column, anterior wall, quadrilateral plate and superior dome). It is the workhorse exposure for anterior and both-column acetabular fractures, periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) and paediatric hip reconstruction, and underpins the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty. Why anterior. It is the only approach to the hip that uses a true internervous plane, so it tolerates extensive dissection without denervating muscle. Supine positioning is a major practical advantage: better respiratory mechanics for anaesthesia, the option of simultaneous bilateral procedures, easy C-arm access without repositioning, and β€” after DAA THA β€” no hip precautions. Historical context. Marius Nygaard Smith-Petersen described the approach in 1917 for hip arthrodesis. It was used through the mid-20th century for acetabular fractures and complex reconstruction, and was revived from the 2000s as the DAA for minimally invasive THA (the same interval, historically also termed the Hueter approach). Position & landmarks. The patient is supine on a radiolucent table (a specialised DAA traction table is optional for THA; a standard table suffices for acetabular work). Palpate and mark the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) β€” the primary landmark β€” the iliac crest, the greater trochanter laterally, and the femoral pulse medially. The incision is planned lateral to the femoral pulse; mark the pulse before draping and never deviate medially, where the femoral neurovascular bundle lies. The C-arm comes from the contralateral side for AP, and inlet/obturator-oblique views when needed.

Primary THA (young, active, suitable anatomy)
Indication strength
Preferred by some surgeons
Key advantage
Muscle-sparing, faster early recovery
Main risk
Learning curve, LFCN injury
Acetabular fracture (anterior column / wall)
Indication strength
Gold standard with extension
Key advantage
Full acetabular visualization
Main risk
Heterotopic ossification
DDH reconstruction (PAO, Pemberton)
Indication strength
Standard approach
Key advantage
Acetabular reorientation access
Main risk
Protect LFCN in children
Hip arthrodesis
Indication strength
Historical indication
Key advantage
Wide exposure for fusion
Main risk
Rarely performed today
When to use the anterior (Smith-Petersen) approach
Clinical scenarioIndication strengthKey advantageMain risk
Primary THA (young, active, suitable anatomy)Preferred by some surgeonsMuscle-sparing, faster early recoveryLearning curve, LFCN injury
Acetabular fracture (anterior column / wall)Gold standard with extensionFull acetabular visualizationHeterotopic ossification
DDH reconstruction (PAO, Pemberton)Standard approachAcetabular reorientation accessProtect LFCN in children
Hip arthrodesisHistorical indicationWide exposure for fusionRarely performed today
Classic Smith-Petersen
Key feature
Curved incision from ASIS toward greater trochanter
Primary use
Acetabular fractures, PAO
Direct Anterior Approach (DAA)
Key feature
Longitudinal incision between ASIS and greater trochanter
Primary use
Total hip arthroplasty
Hueter approach
Key feature
More medial interval emphasis
Primary use
THA (historical)
Extended iliofemoral
Key feature
Proximal extension along the iliac crest
Primary use
Complex acetabular fractures
Approach variants
VariantKey featurePrimary use
Classic Smith-PetersenCurved incision from ASIS toward greater trochanterAcetabular fractures, PAO
Direct Anterior Approach (DAA)Longitudinal incision between ASIS and greater trochanterTotal hip arthroplasty
Hueter approachMore medial interval emphasisTHA (historical)
Extended iliofemoralProximal extension along the iliac crestComplex acetabular fractures

The Exposure


The exposure is built on a true internervous plane and developed layer by layer, protecting the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve superficially and the femoral nerve medially, then ligating the ascending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery before opening the capsule.

Intra-operative Smith-Petersen anterior approach to the hip
Intra-operative photograph of the Smith-Petersen anterior approach, the interval developed between the sartorius and tensor fasciae latae.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

The internervous plane β€” the anatomical basis. The approach exploits the interval between the tensor fasciae latae (superior gluteal nerve) and sartorius (femoral nerve). A second, deeper internervous plane lies between rectus femoris (femoral nerve) medially and gluteus medius/minimus (superior gluteal nerve) laterally. Both are true internervous planes, which is what makes the approach safe for extensile dissection.

Tensor fasciae latae (TFL)
Nerve supply
Superior gluteal nerve (L4–S1)
Position
Lateral border of interval
Function
Hip flexion, abduction, internal rotation
Sartorius
Nerve supply
Femoral nerve (L2–L3)
Position
Medial border of interval
Function
Hip flexion, external rotation (longest muscle)
Rectus femoris
Nerve supply
Femoral nerve (L2–L4)
Position
Deep, between TFL and sartorius
Function
Hip flexion, knee extension (two heads: straight from AIIS, reflected from superior acetabular rim)
The interval β€” structures and nerve supply
StructureNerve supplyPositionFunction
Tensor fasciae latae (TFL)Superior gluteal nerve (L4–S1)Lateral border of intervalHip flexion, abduction, internal rotation
SartoriusFemoral nerve (L2–L3)Medial border of intervalHip flexion, external rotation (longest muscle)
Rectus femorisFemoral nerve (L2–L4)Deep, between TFL and sartoriusHip flexion, knee extension (two heads: straight from AIIS, reflected from superior acetabular rim)

Exposure sequence

Step 1Incision and surface landmarks
  • Palpate the ASIS, the greater trochanter and the femoral pulse (marking the neurovascular bundle medially).
  • Classic Smith-Petersen: start about 2 cm distal and lateral to the ASIS and curve distally toward the greater trochanter, 10–15 cm, staying lateral to the femoral pulse.
  • DAA variant: a longitudinal incision of 8–10 cm between the ASIS and the greater trochanter, centred over the palpable interval.
Step 2Find and protect the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve
  • The LFCN runs in the subcutaneous layer from lateral to medial, usually 1–2 cm distal to the ASIS, passing under, through or lateral to the inguinal ligament.
  • Either identify and retract it medially to preserve it, or β€” if it is tented across the field β€” divide and bury the proximal end.
  • Anatomy is highly variable; counsel every patient about meralgia paraesthetica (10–20%).
Step 3Open the fascia and define the interval
  • Incise the fascia lata over the tensor in line with the skin incision.
  • Palpate the interval between the TFL laterally (taut, band-like) and sartorius medially (softer), and mark it.
Step 4Develop the internervous plane
  • Bluntly develop the plane between TFL (superior gluteal nerve) and sartorius (femoral nerve) β€” a true internervous plane.
  • Extend proximally to just below the inguinal ligament; place hand-held or cautious self-retaining retractors.
Step 5Manage the rectus femoris
  • The rectus femoris lies deep in the interval, with a straight head (from AIIS) and a reflected head (from the superior acetabular rim).
  • For THA, retract rectus medially together with iliopsoas; for acetabular work, the reflected head may be released for better visualisation.
Step 6Ligate the ascending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery
  • The ascending branch of the LCFA runs between rectus and TFL and is a consistent bleeder if not addressed.
  • Identify and ligate or clip it early for haemostasis; avoid diathermy close to the nerve.
Step 7Expose the capsule and perform the capsulotomy
  • Retract TFL laterally and sartorius with rectus medially to expose the anterior hip capsule.
  • THA: T-shaped or inverted-L capsulotomy (longitudinal along the femoral neck, transverse along the acetabular rim). Acetabular: limited capsulotomy/capsulectomy to the anterior column and rim. Paediatric DDH: a superiorly-based capsular flap, preserved for closure.
  • Identify the femoral neck, acetabular rim, transverse acetabular ligament and labrum.
Protect the femoral nerve medially

The femoral nerve lies medial to the operative field, deep to sartorius. Excessive medial retraction or prolonged retractor pressure causes a stretch neuropraxia presenting as postoperative quadriceps weakness and loss of knee extension. Use self-retaining retractors cautiously, place them lateral to the neurovascular bundle, and release them periodically.

Why the internervous plane matters

This is the only true internervous plane approach to the hip. Both the superficial plane (TFL versus sartorius) and the deep plane (rectus femoris versus gluteus medius/minimus) are internervous, so extensive dissection β€” including the iliofemoral extension for 360-degree acetabular access β€” can be performed without motor denervation.

Dangers & Extensions


Structures at risk, by layer

Subcutaneous
Structure at risk
Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (crosses field; 10–20% injury)
Protection
Incise lateral to the femoral pulse; identify and protect or divide with consent; counsel about meralgia paraesthetica
Deep interval
Structure at risk
Ascending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery
Protection
Identify and ligate early for haemostasis
Medial, deep to sartorius
Structure at risk
Femoral nerve and vessels
Protection
Avoid excessive medial retraction; place retractors lateral to the bundle; release periodically
Lateral to TFL
Structure at risk
Superior gluteal nerve (to TFL)
Protection
Stay superficial to the muscle; avoid aggressive deep lateral retraction
Danger structures and how to protect them
LayerStructure at riskProtection
SubcutaneousLateral femoral cutaneous nerve (crosses field; 10–20% injury)Incise lateral to the femoral pulse; identify and protect or divide with consent; counsel about meralgia paraesthetica
Deep intervalAscending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral arteryIdentify and ligate early for haemostasis
Medial, deep to sartoriusFemoral nerve and vesselsAvoid excessive medial retraction; place retractors lateral to the bundle; release periodically
Lateral to TFLSuperior gluteal nerve (to TFL)Stay superficial to the muscle; avoid aggressive deep lateral retraction

Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve variability (cadaveric). The LFCN is highly variable and cannot always be preserved. Across cadaveric series it crosses the DAA skin incision in roughly 42–65% of specimens (Sugano 42%; Ukai 64.9%; Giang 50%); shortening the proximal extent of the incision lowers the crossing rate.

Posterior-dominant
Description
Posterior branch thicker than or equal to anterior (Sugano)
Reported frequency
~63% (Sugano, n=64 thighs)
Surgical implication
Branches fan toward TFL β€” higher chance of crossing the incision
Anterior-dominant
Description
Thicker anterior branch along the medial border of TFL
Reported frequency
~37% (Sugano)
Surgical implication
Often medial to the incision β€” more protectable
Fan type
Description
Multiple divergent branches below the inguinal ligament
Reported frequency
~40% (Giang, n=30 hips)
Surgical implication
Multiple branches cannot all be protected
Sartorius type
Description
Branch crossing over or through the sartorius region
Reported frequency
~37% (Giang)
Surgical implication
Crosses the field β€” moderate risk
LFCN branching patterns in cadaveric studies
PatternDescriptionReported frequencySurgical implication
Posterior-dominantPosterior branch thicker than or equal to anterior (Sugano)~63% (Sugano, n=64 thighs)Branches fan toward TFL β€” higher chance of crossing the incision
Anterior-dominantThicker anterior branch along the medial border of TFL~37% (Sugano)Often medial to the incision β€” more protectable
Fan typeMultiple divergent branches below the inguinal ligament~40% (Giang, n=30 hips)Multiple branches cannot all be protected
Sartorius typeBranch crossing over or through the sartorius region~37% (Giang)Crosses the field β€” moderate risk

Complications

LFCN injury (meralgia paraesthetica)
Incidence
10–20%
Prevention / management
Careful lateral dissection; identify/protect; counsel preoperatively; most recover over 6–12 months
Femoral nerve neuropraxia
Incidence
1–3% (usually temporary)
Prevention / management
Avoid excessive medial retraction; release retractors periodically
Lateral circumflex femoral vessel injury
Incidence
Common (manageable)
Prevention / management
Identify and ligate the ascending branch early
Proximal femoral fracture (THA)
Incidence
1–2% (learning-curve dependent)
Prevention / management
Careful broaching, fluoroscopy, avoid varus; extend wound if difficult
Heterotopic ossification (trauma)
Incidence
10–20%
Prevention / management
Indomethacin prophylaxis or radiation; minimise soft-tissue stripping
Wound infection
Incidence
1–2% (THA), 5–10% (trauma)
Prevention / management
Standard prophylaxis; minimise tissue trauma
Wound haematoma
Incidence
2–5%
Prevention / management
Careful haemostasis; consider a drain for trauma cases
Complications of the anterior hip approach
ComplicationIncidencePrevention / management
LFCN injury (meralgia paraesthetica)10–20%Careful lateral dissection; identify/protect; counsel preoperatively; most recover over 6–12 months
Femoral nerve neuropraxia1–3% (usually temporary)Avoid excessive medial retraction; release retractors periodically
Lateral circumflex femoral vessel injuryCommon (manageable)Identify and ligate the ascending branch early
Proximal femoral fracture (THA)1–2% (learning-curve dependent)Careful broaching, fluoroscopy, avoid varus; extend wound if difficult
Heterotopic ossification (trauma)10–20%Indomethacin prophylaxis or radiation; minimise soft-tissue stripping
Wound infection1–2% (THA), 5–10% (trauma)Standard prophylaxis; minimise tissue trauma
Wound haematoma2–5%Careful haemostasis; consider a drain for trauma cases

LFCN injury management. Most injuries are neuropraxic and recover over 6–12 months; permanent numbness occurs in only 5–10% and is usually well tolerated. Neuropathic pain may need gabapentin or pregabalin; surgical exploration is rarely indicated. Always distinguish LFCN injury (sensory only) from a femoral nerve injury (quadriceps weakness). Extensile option β€” the iliofemoral extension. For full acetabular access, extend the incision proximally along the iliac crest, detach the abdominal wall muscles (external oblique, internal oblique, transversus) from the crest, and reflect the iliacus subperiosteally from the inner table working lateral to medial. This exposes the pelvic brim, quadrilateral plate and anterior column and gives 360-degree acetabular visualisation. Both-column fractures can often be fixed through this single approach, because stabilising both columns to the intact ilium secures the fracture without a posterior approach. Closure. Repair the capsule (always, for fracture and paediatric cases; surgeon preference for THA), close the TFL–sartorius fascial interval if opened widely (absorbable suture), close dead space with attention to haemostasis (a drain is favoured for acetabular trauma), and close skin with a subcuticular suture or staples.

Procedures Through This Approach


  • Total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach (DAA) β€” the principal elective operation; muscle-sparing, supine, and no hip precautions postoperatively. Femoral exposure is the limiting factor (hardest in muscular or obese patients, BMI over 35).
  • Acetabular fracture ORIF β€” anterior column, anterior wall, both-column and anterior column/posterior hemitransverse patterns (Judet-Letournel). Elementary types: anterior wall, anterior column, posterior wall, posterior column, transverse. Associated types: both-column (the commonest associated pattern, ~25%), T-shaped, transverse + posterior wall, anterior column/posterior hemitransverse, anterior wall/posterior hemitransverse. Postoperatively: touch weight-bearing for 6 weeks and heterotopic ossification prophylaxis (indomethacin 75 mg daily for 3 weeks, or a single 700 cGy radiation dose).
  • Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), Pemberton osteotomy and DDH open reduction β€” standard exposure for acetabular reorientation and paediatric hip reconstruction.
  • Hip arthrodesis β€” Smith-Petersen's original 1917 indication; rarely performed today.
  • Iliopsoas tenotomy β€” for symptomatic iliopsoas impingement after THA, via lesser trochanter access.
  • Anterior hip arthroscopy portal placement β€” uses the same landmarks and internervous plane.
No hip precautions after DAA THA

Unlike the posterior approach, anterior approach THA does not require hip precautions β€” patients may flex, adduct and internally rotate without restriction, which supports faster early recovery (the advantage narrows to equivalence by one year).

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

SARTORSARTOR β€” the anterior interval

S
Sartorius
Medial border of the interval β€” femoral nerve
A
ASIS origin
Sartorius originates from the ASIS
R
Rectus femoris
Lies deep between the two muscles β€” femoral nerve
T
Tensor fasciae latae
Lateral border of the interval β€” superior gluteal nerve
O
Origin lateral to ASIS
TFL originates lateral to the ASIS
R
Retract carefully
Protect the LFCN crossing the field
Mnemonic

LFCNLFCN β€” the structure at risk

L
Lateral femoral cutaneous
A pure sensory nerve
F
From L2–L3 roots
Emerges at the lateral border of psoas
C
Crosses the inguinal ligament
Near the ASIS β€” variable anatomy
N
Numbness if injured
Meralgia paraesthetica β€” anterolateral thigh

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œDescribe the anterior approach to the hip (Smith-Petersen). What is the internervous plane and what structures are at risk?”

Viva scenarioChallenging
Clinical prompt

β€œDuring a primary THA via the direct anterior approach, after the femoral neck osteotomy you cannot access the femoral canal because of a muscular thigh. What are your options?”

Viva scenarioCritical
Clinical prompt

β€œA patient returns two weeks after anterior approach THA with anterolateral thigh numbness and dysesthesia. What is the likely diagnosis and how do you manage it?”

Exam day cheat sheet
HIP ANTERIOR APPROACH (SMITH-PETERSEN) β€” exam-day essentials

Key anatomy

  • Internervous plane: TFL (superior gluteal) vs sartorius (femoral)
  • LFCN crosses the field β€” 10–20% injury rate (meralgia paraesthetica)
  • Femoral nerve lies medial β€” protect from stretch injury
  • Rectus femoris lies deep between TFL and sartorius
  • Ascending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery β€” ligate early

Indications

  • THA via DAA β€” muscle-sparing, faster recovery
  • Acetabular fractures β€” anterior column, both-column with extension
  • Paediatric hip β€” DDH, PAO, Pemberton osteotomy
  • Extensile with iliofemoral extension for full acetabular access

Positioning and setup

  • Supine position β€” allows bilateral procedures, easier anaesthesia
  • C-arm from the contralateral side
  • Incision: ASIS toward greater trochanter region
  • Mark the femoral pulse β€” stay lateral to the neurovascular bundle

Surgical steps

  • Step 1: Incise 2 cm distal-lateral to ASIS, curving toward the greater trochanter
  • Step 2: Identify and protect the LFCN in the subcutaneous layer
  • Step 3: Open fascia between TFL (lateral) and sartorius (medial)
  • Step 4: Develop the internervous plane bluntly
  • Step 5: Identify rectus femoris deep in the interval
  • Step 6: Ligate the ascending branch of the LCFA
  • Step 7: Expose the anterior capsule and perform the capsulotomy

Complications

  • LFCN injury: 10–20%, causes meralgia paraesthetica
  • Femoral nerve stretch: 1–3%, causes quadriceps weakness
  • Proximal femoral fracture: 1–2% (THA), limited femoral visualisation
  • LCFA bleeding: consistent if not ligated early
  • Heterotopic ossification: 10–20% in trauma cases

Key evidence

  • Smith-Petersen 1917: original description for hip arthrodesis
  • True internervous plane: safe for extensive dissection
  • DAA meta-analysis: faster early recovery, no long-term difference
  • LFCN injury: consistent 10–20% across studies
  • Letournel: gold standard for anterior acetabular access

References


Approach data across major joint registries (side by side)

NJR
Region
England, Wales, Northern Ireland
Relevant finding
Posterior remains the most common approach; no clinically meaningful difference in revision between anterior and posterior at medium term
AOANJRR
Region
Australia
Relevant finding
Rapidly rising DAA utilisation; tracks higher early revision during the learning curve
AJRR
Region
United States
Relevant finding
Largest growth in DAA utilisation internationally; approach-specific outcome tracking
SHAR / Norwegian
Region
Sweden / Norway
Relevant finding
Long implant survivorship data; surgeon and unit volume are strong outcome predictors
Approach data across major joint registries
RegistryRegionRelevant finding
NJREngland, Wales, Northern IrelandPosterior remains the most common approach; no clinically meaningful difference in revision between anterior and posterior at medium term
AOANJRRAustraliaRapidly rising DAA utilisation; tracks higher early revision during the learning curve
AJRRUnited StatesLargest growth in DAA utilisation internationally; approach-specific outcome tracking
SHAR / NorwegianSweden / NorwayLong implant survivorship data; surgeon and unit volume are strong outcome predictors

Named-society guidance and global practice. AAOS (US) and NICE / BOA (UK) do not mandate a single surgical approach for primary THA β€” approach choice rests on surgeon expertise and patient factors, with equivalent long-term outcomes emphasised. AO Foundation / Letournel-Judet principles underpin the Smith-Petersen, iliofemoral and anterior intrapelvic approaches for anterior column and both-column acetabular fractures. Informed consent should specifically cover LFCN injury and meralgia paraesthetica, the learning-curve risk (intraoperative femoral fracture within the first roughly 30–50 cases), and the possibility of wound extension or approach conversion for difficult femoral exposure. Specialised DAA traction tables and femoral elevators are used in some centres; a standard radiolucent table is adequate for the classic Smith-Petersen and for acetabular work, and the underlying internervous anatomy is identical worldwide.

Evidence

Smith-Petersen Original Description (historical)

Guideline
Smith-Petersen MN β€’ Original technique description (1917)
Key Findings:
  • Original description of the anterior approach to the hip for arthrodesis
  • Defined the internervous interval between tensor fasciae latae and sartorius
  • Established the anatomical foundation for the modern direct anterior approach (DAA)
  • Subsequently popularised as the Hueter anterior interval for THA
Clinical implication: Historical landmark establishing the anatomical basis for all modern anterior hip approaches; cited as a foundational technique reference with no contemporary PMID.
Evidence

DAA vs Posterior Approach THA β€” Meta-analysis of RCTs

LoE 1
Yang XT, Huang HF, Sun L, et al β€’ Orthopaedic Surgery (2020)
Key Findings:
  • Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, 932 patients (467 DAA, 465 posterior)
  • Markedly higher LFCN injury with DAA (RR 38.97, 95% CI 7.89–192.57)
  • Less early postoperative pain with DAA (WMD -0.65)
  • Earlier cessation of walking aids with DAA; more cups within the Lewinnek safe zone
  • No significant difference in operative time, hospital stay or intraoperative blood loss
Clinical implication: At RCT level the DAA gives faster early recovery and less early pain, but at the cost of a substantially higher rate of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury.
Limitation: Short follow-up in included trials; heterogeneity in surgeon experience.
Verify source (DOI)
Evidence

DAA vs Mini-Posterior THA β€” Randomised Trial at 7.5 Years

LoE 2
Roberts HJ, Hadley ML, Mallinger BD, et al β€’ The Journal of Arthroplasty (2024)
Key Findings:
  • RCT of DAA versus mini-posterior approach, 93 of 101 patients reviewed at mean 7.5 years
  • Similar Harris Hip, SF-12 and HOOS scores between groups
  • No clinical outcome reached the minimal clinically important difference
  • Few complications in each group (DAA: 1 revision for femoral loosening; MPA: 3 dislocations)
  • Early functional advantages of DAA did not translate into meaningful midterm differences
Clinical implication: Beyond the early recovery window, DAA and posterior approaches give equivalent midterm clinical outcomes; approach choice should rest on surgeon expertise and patient factors.
Limitation: Single-centre, modest sample size; high-volume designer surgeons.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 38735544)
Evidence

LFCN Anatomy and Crossing of the DAA Incision (cadaveric)

LoE 4
Ukai T, Suyama K, Hayashi S, et al β€’ BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (2022)
Key Findings:
  • Cadaveric study of 37 hemipelves comparing DAA and anterolateral supine incisions
  • 64.9% of DAA incisions crossed the LFCN versus 27% for the anterolateral supine incision
  • LFCN lay significantly closer to the DAA incision (median 10 mm vs 27 mm)
  • DAA crossed the LFCN most often at the proximal third of the incision
  • Shortening the proximal incision by 10 mm reduced crossing by ~25%
Clinical implication: The LFCN crosses the DAA incision in roughly two-thirds of hips; limiting the proximal extent of the incision is a practical way to reduce LFCN injury.
Limitation: Cadaveric anatomy; clinical injury rates are lower than crossing rates.
Verify source (DOI)
Evidence

LFCN Branching Patterns and Injury Risk in DAA (cadaveric)

LoE 4
Sugano M, Nakamura J, Hagiwara S, et al β€’ Modern Rheumatology (2019)
Key Findings:
  • 64 thighs from 45 cadavers studied for LFCN branching relative to the DAA
  • Posterior-dominant branching in 63%, anterior-dominant in 37%
  • LFCN crossed the planned skin incision along the midline of TFL in 42% of thighs
  • Highly variable branching means the nerve cannot always be protected
  • Defines a relative safe zone for the DAA skin incision
Clinical implication: LFCN anatomy is too variable to guarantee preservation; counsel every patient about meralgia paraesthetica and keep dissection along the lateral border of TFL.
Limitation: Cadaveric, single ethnic population; anatomical not clinical endpoint.
Verify source (DOI)
Editorially reviewed β€” transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
25 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
25 min
Updated
2026-06-20
PROCEDURES USING THIS APPROACH
Total Hip Replacement - Direct Anterior Approach (DAA)
Browse all procedures