Trauma

Hip Anterior Approach (Smith-Petersen)

Comprehensive guide to the anterior approach to the hip (Smith-Petersen) - indications, internervous plane, step-by-step technique, structures at risk, and surgical decision-making for orthopaedic fellowship exam

Core Procedure
advanced
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

High Yield Overview

HIP ANTERIOR APPROACH (SMITH-PETERSEN)

Internervous Plane | Femoral Nerve at Risk | Extensile for Acetabular Access

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

*/}

Critical Anterior Approach Exam Points

Internervous Plane

True internervous plane between TFL (superior gluteal nerve) and sartorius (femoral nerve). This makes the approach safe for extensive dissection without motor nerve injury risk. The interval is between rectus femoris medially and TFL laterally in the deep plane.

LFCN Preservation

Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve crosses the surgical field lateral to medial. Injury causes meralgia paresthetica (anterolateral thigh numbness). Incidence 10-20%. Identify and protect or accept division with patient counseling.

Femoral Neurovascular Bundle

The femoral nerve, artery, and vein lie medial to sartorius. Excessive medial retraction or prolonged retractor pressure risks femoral nerve stretch injury. Use self-retaining retractors carefully and release periodically.

Extensile Capability

Can be extended proximally with iliofemoral extension for full acetabular access (360 degrees). Requires detachment of external oblique from iliac crest and reflection of iliacus. Essential for acetabular fractures and complex reconstructions.

Quick Decision Guide - When to Use Anterior Approach

Mnemonic

SARTOR-TANSARTOR-TAN - The Interval Muscles

Memory Hook:SARTOR is the tailor (sartorius muscle) who sits cross-legged - medial border of the interval. TAN is tensor - lateral border!

Mnemonic

LFCNLFCN - Structure at Risk

Memory Hook:The LFCN is Like Finding a Crossing Nerve - it crosses the operative field and is hard to see consistently!

Mnemonic

SAFESAFE RETRACTION - Avoiding Complications

Memory Hook:Keep retraction SAFE to protect the femoral nerve and vessels lying medially!

Overview and Historical Context

The Smith-Petersen anterior approach to the hip was first described by Marius Nygaard Smith-Petersen in 1917 for hip arthrodesis. It utilizes a true internervous plane between the tensor fasciae latae (superior gluteal nerve) and sartorius (femoral nerve), making it one of the safest approaches for extensive hip surgery.

Historical evolution:

  • 1917: Original description by Smith-Petersen for arthrodesis
  • 1950s-1970s: Used for acetabular fractures and complex hip reconstruction
  • 2000s: Revival as Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty
  • Current: Standard for acetabular surgery, growing use for minimally invasive THA

Modern applications:

  1. Total hip arthroplasty - Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) variant
  2. Acetabular fracture fixation - anterior column, anterior wall, both-column patterns
  3. Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) - for developmental dysplasia of hip
  4. Pediatric hip surgery - DDH open reduction, pelvic osteotomies
  5. Hip arthroscopy - anterior portal placement uses same landmarks

Why This Approach Matters

The anterior approach is the only true internervous plane approach to the hip. This anatomical advantage makes it safe for extensive dissection and explains its continued use for complex acetabular work despite the learning curve required.

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Surface anatomy:

  • ASIS - primary landmark, palpable anteriorly
  • Iliac crest - extends posteriorly from ASIS
  • Femoral pulse - marks position of femoral artery (medial to field)
  • Greater trochanter - palpable laterally

Deep structures:

  • Rectus femoris - two heads (straight and reflected) must be identified and retracted
  • Hip capsule - accessed between rectus and TFL after muscle retraction
  • Iliopsoas - lies on medial aspect of capsule
  • Ascending branch of lateral circumflex femoral artery - between TFL and rectus, requires ligation

Acetabular anatomy (for extensile exposure):

  • Anterior column - from iliac crest to pubic symphysis
  • Anterior wall - anterior rim of acetabulum
  • Quadrilateral plate - medial wall visualization possible
  • Ilioinguinal ligament - released for distal extension

Internervous Plane

True Internervous Plane: The approach exploits the interval between the Tensor Fasciae Latae (myotome L4-S1) and the Sartorius (myotome L2-L3).

Classification Systems

Approach Variants Classification:

Smith-Petersen Approach Variants

The approach variant chosen depends primarily on the indication and required exposure.

Clinical Assessment

Preoperative Patient Selection:

Ideal candidates for anterior approach THA:

  • BMI under 35 (obesity increases difficulty)
  • Normal femoral anatomy (not severe retroversion/valgus)
  • No previous anterior hip surgery
  • Preserved hip flexion (over 90 degrees)
  • Primary arthroplasty (revisions more challenging)

Physical examination findings:

  • Hip range of motion assessment
  • Flexion contracture evaluation
  • Leg length discrepancy measurement
  • Neurovascular status (especially LFCN distribution)
  • Skin quality over anterior approach

Contraindications/caution:

  • Morbid obesity (BMI over 40)
  • Severe femoral retroversion or valgus deformity
  • Proximal femoral hardware or deformity
  • Previous anterior approach surgery
  • Ankylosed hip

Careful patient selection optimizes outcomes for anterior approach THA.

Investigations

Imaging Assessment:

Plain Radiographs

Standard views:

  • AP pelvis (bilateral comparison)
  • Lateral hip (cross-table or frog-leg)
  • Judet views for acetabular fracture (obturator oblique, iliac oblique)

What to assess:

  • Femoral anteversion (templating)
  • Acetabular version and coverage
  • Bone quality (osteoporosis indicators)
  • Previous hardware or deformity

CT Scan

Indications:

  • Acetabular fractures (essential for classification)
  • Complex deformity (DDH, Paget's)
  • Revision surgery planning
  • 3D reconstruction for surgical planning

Key information:

  • Fracture pattern and displacement
  • Marginal impaction assessment
  • Fragment size and location
  • Sciatic buttress involvement

Additional Investigations:

Preoperative Laboratory Studies:

  • Full blood count (hemoglobin, platelets)
  • Coagulation screen (for trauma)
  • Group and hold (THA) or cross-match (trauma)
  • Renal function (contrast/medication adjustment)
  • Blood glucose (diabetes optimization)

Investigation Priority

For acetabular fractures, CT with 3D reconstruction is mandatory for surgical planning and approach selection. The Judet radiographs are useful for initial classification but CT provides the definitive assessment of fracture pattern, marginal impaction, and posterior wall integrity.

Management Algorithm

Decision tree flowchart for Anterior Hip Approach indication selection
Click to expand
Surgical decision-making for Anterior Hip Approach: Choosing between DAA, Smith-Petersen, and Extensions based on pathology (THA, Trauma, DDH).Credit: MedVellum AI Illustration

Decision Algorithm - Approach Selection:

Surgical Decision-Making Process

AssessmentStep 1: Define Indication

THA: Consider DAA variant. Acetabular fracture: Smith-Petersen with extension. DDH reconstruction: Classic Smith-Petersen. Combined pathology: Plan extensile approach.

Patient SelectionStep 2: Assess Patient Factors

BMI and body habitus. Previous surgery and scarring. Bone quality and anatomy. Medical comorbidities. Expected compliance.

Technical FactorsStep 3: Surgeon Experience

Learning curve consideration (DAA: 30-50 cases). Equipment availability (fracture table, specialized retractors). Team familiarity with approach. Backup plan if difficulties encountered.

Preoperative PlanStep 4: Procedure Planning

Template implants (THA). Plate and screw selection (fracture). Fluoroscopy requirements. Table and positioning needs.

The decision pathway should systematically address all factors before committing to approach selection.

Indications and Patient Selection

Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) for THA:

Ideal candidates:

  • Young, active patients seeking faster recovery
  • Normal to increased femoral anteversion
  • Non-obese patients (BMI under 35 preferred)
  • Primary THA with normal anatomy

Relative contraindications:

  • Severe obesity (BMI over 40) - difficult femoral exposure
  • Severe retroversion or valgus femur - challenging femoral preparation
  • Previous anterior hip surgery - scarring complicates dissection
  • Severe flexion contracture - limits femoral access

Advantages:

  • True muscle-sparing approach
  • Lower dislocation risk (theoretically)
  • Faster early recovery and mobilization
  • Supine positioning allows bilateral procedures

Disadvantages:

  • Steep learning curve (30-50 cases)
  • Limited femoral exposure (difficult revisions)
  • LFCN injury risk
  • Specialized table/equipment often used

This approach has gained significant popularity as the DAA for THA due to perceived faster recovery, though long-term outcomes are similar to other approaches.

Positioning

Patient position: Supine

Positioning Steps

Step 1Anesthesia
  • General or spinal anesthesia
  • Ensure adequate muscle relaxation
  • Discuss with anesthesia team: hypotensive technique for trauma (reduced blood loss)
Step 2Supine on radiolucent table
  • Standard operating table or specialized fracture/arthroplasty table
  • For THA: Some surgeons use specialized DAA table with femoral positioner
  • For fracture: Standard table with C-arm access
Step 3Padding and pressure areas
  • Occiput padded
  • Arms positioned on arm boards (abducted under 90 degrees)
  • Sacrum and heels padded
  • Non-operative leg: slight hip flexion and abduction
Step 4Image intensifier positioning
  • C-arm from contralateral side for AP views
  • Ensure clear AP pelvis and lateral hip imaging possible
  • For fracture: inlet and obturator oblique views must be achievable
Step 5Skin preparation
  • From umbilicus to mid-thigh
  • From midline anteriorly to posterior axillary line laterally
  • Chlorhexidine or betadine per protocol
  • Draping: Include anterior iliac crest and proximal thigh

Positioning Advantages

Supine positioning is a major advantage of the anterior approach:

  • Easier for anesthesia (better respiratory mechanics)
  • Allows bilateral simultaneous procedures for bilateral hip disease
  • C-arm access for intraoperative imaging without repositioning
  • Familiar positioning for surgical team reduces setup time

Surgical Technique

Surface Landmarks and Incision

Palpable landmarks:

  • ASIS (anterior superior iliac spine) - primary landmark
  • Greater trochanter - lateral and distal
  • Femoral pulse - medial (marks neurovascular bundle)

Incision options:

Standard Smith-Petersen (for acetabular work):

  • Start 2cm distal and lateral to ASIS
  • Curve distally and laterally toward greater trochanter
  • Length: 10-15cm (can extend as needed)
  • Stays lateral to neurovascular bundle

Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) for THA:

  • Longitudinal incision between ASIS and greater trochanter
  • Length: 8-10cm for minimally invasive technique
  • Centered over palpable interval between TFL and sartorius

Avoid Medial Deviation

Keep incision lateral to the femoral pulse. Medial deviation risks injury to femoral neurovascular structures. Mark the femoral pulse before draping and plan incision lateral to this.

Structures at Risk

Structures at Risk

Primary risks:

  1. LFCN - crosses field from lateral to medial under inguinal ligament. Injury rate 10-20% causing meralgia paresthetica.
  2. Femoral nerve - lies medial to sartorius. Stretch injury from excessive medial retraction causes quadriceps weakness and loss of knee extension.
  3. Lateral circumflex femoral vessels - deep branch (ascending) runs between rectus and TFL. Must be ligated for hemostasis.
  4. Superior gluteal nerve - lateral to TFL, rarely injured if staying in superficial plane.

Vascular:

  • Ascending branch of lateral circumflex femoral artery: Consistent bleeder in the interval.
  • Femoral Artery: Medial to sartorius, at risk with excessive medial retraction.

Nerve:

  • LFCN: Most common injury (sensory).
  • Femoral Nerve: Motor injury (quadriceps).

Wound Closure

Wound closure:

Closure Steps

Layer 1Capsule
  • If preserved: Repair capsule with interrupted absorbable sutures
  • If excised: Proceed to fascial closure (for THA)
  • For fracture/pediatric: Always repair capsule for stability
Layer 2Fascia
  • Repair TFL-sartorius interval if opened widely
  • Usually not necessary for limited THA incision
  • Use absorbable suture (0 or 1 Vicryl)
Layer 3Subcutaneous
  • Close dead space with 2-0 Vicryl
  • Ensure hemostasis - anterior approach can have significant bleeding
  • Drain placement controversial (author preference for acetabular fracture, not for THA)
Layer 4Skin
  • Subcuticular 3-0 Monocryl or skin staples
  • Skin adhesive or sterile strips
  • Waterproof dressing

Complications and Management

Complications of Anterior Hip Approach

LFCN injury management:

  • Most recover spontaneously over 6-12 months
  • Temporary numbness common, permanent in 5-10%
  • Neuropathic pain (less common) may require gabapentin or nerve block
  • Surgical exploration rarely indicated

Femoral nerve stretch injury:

  • Presents as quadriceps weakness and loss of knee extension
  • Usually neuropraxia - recovers over weeks to months
  • EMG at 3-4 weeks if no recovery to confirm neuropraxia vs axonotmesis
  • Knee brace for stability during recovery
  • Physiotherapy for quadriceps strengthening

Complication Counseling

Preoperative counseling should specifically mention:

  • LFCN injury risk (10-20%) and meralgia paresthetica symptoms
  • Possibility of quadriceps weakness (femoral nerve)
  • Longer learning curve for surgeon (if within first 30-50 cases)
  • Potential for wound extension or approach conversion in difficult cases

Informed consent is particularly important for elective anterior approach THA given these specific risks.

Postoperative Care

Postoperative Protocol by Indication:

Day 0-1 (Immediate postoperative):

  • Early mobilization: same day or day 1
  • No hip precautions required (advantage of anterior approach)
  • Weight bearing as tolerated with walker or crutches
  • DVT prophylaxis: Aspirin 100mg BD or rivaroxaban 10mg daily
  • Multimodal analgesia: paracetamol, NSAIDs (if appropriate), opioids PRN
  • Ice and elevation

Day 1-14 (Early recovery):

  • Progress to cane or single crutch
  • Physiotherapy: gait training, hip strengthening
  • Wound check at day 14
  • Remove staples/sutures at 14 days

Week 2-6 (Rehabilitation):

  • Wean walking aids (typically by week 4-6)
  • Progressive strengthening exercises
  • Activity modification as tolerated
  • Drive when off narcotics and safe (typically 4-6 weeks)

6 weeks and beyond:

  • Review with X-ray
  • Return to full activities as tolerated
  • Sports typically allowed 3-6 months postoperatively

The absence of hip precautions facilitates faster functional recovery compared to posterior approach.

No Hip Precautions - Anterior Advantage

Unlike posterior approach THA, anterior approach THA does not require hip precautions. Patients can flex, adduct, and internally rotate without restriction. This contributes to faster early recovery and improved patient satisfaction in the first 6 weeks.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Expected Outcomes by Indication:

Outcome Summary - Anterior Hip Approach

THA Approach Comparison - Registry Data (AOANJRR 2023):

*/}

Key registry findings:

  • Anterior approach: 15% of primary THA in Australia
  • Posterior approach: 60% of primary THA
  • Revision rates similar across approaches at 10 years when performed by experienced surgeons
  • Dislocation rates: Anterior 0.6% less than Posterior 2-3% (without repair)
  • Learning curve evident: higher complication rates in first 30-50 cases

Prognosis Factors:

Positive Prognostic Factors

  • Experienced surgeon (over 50 anterior cases)
  • Appropriate patient selection (BMI under 35)
  • Primary procedure (not revision)
  • Good bone quality
  • Anatomic reduction (fracture)

Negative Prognostic Factors

  • Surgeon learning curve (under 30 cases)
  • Obesity (BMI over 35)
  • Complex anatomy or revision
  • Marginal impaction (fracture)
  • Delayed surgery over 14 days (fracture)

Long-term Considerations:

  • THA survivorship: 95% at 10 years, 80% at 20 years (approach independent)
  • Post-traumatic arthritis: 15-50% after acetabular fracture (dependent on reduction quality)
  • Heterotopic ossification: Higher with anterior/extensile approaches - prophylaxis recommended
  • Functional outcomes: Anterior approach shows faster early recovery (6 weeks) but equivalent at 1 year

Evidence Summary

No approach is superior for THA when performed by experienced surgeons. The anterior approach offers lower dislocation rates and faster early recovery, but these advantages are offset by LFCN injury rates and learning curve complications. Registry data shows equivalent 10-year revision rates across all approaches.

Evidence Base

Smith-Petersen Original Description

5
Smith-Petersen MN • J Orthop Surg (1917)
Clinical Implication: Historical landmark paper establishing the anatomical foundation for all modern anterior hip approaches including DAA for THA.

Direct Anterior Approach Meta-analysis

3
Meermans et al • J Arthroplasty (2017)
Clinical Implication: DAA offers early recovery advantage but no long-term benefit over other approaches. LFCN injury is a consistent trade-off.
Limitation: Heterogeneity in surgical technique and experience levels across studies. Publication bias favoring DAA.

Acetabular Fracture Fixation via Smith-Petersen

4
Letournel E • Clin Orthop Relat Res (1993)
Clinical Implication: Smith-Petersen with iliofemoral extension remains gold standard for anterior acetabular access in trauma surgery.

LFCN Anatomical Variations and Injury Risk

3
de Ridder VA et al • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2019)
Clinical Implication: Counseling patients about LFCN injury risk is essential. Variable anatomy means nerve cannot always be protected despite careful technique.
Limitation: Anatomical study - clinical correlation based on retrospective data.

AOANJRR Approach Comparison Data

2
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry • Annual Report (2023)
Clinical Implication: Australian registry data supports equivalent outcomes across approaches when performed by experienced surgeons. Approach selection should be based on surgeon expertise and patient factors.
Limitation: Observational registry data - not randomized. Selection bias possible.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Describe the Approach

EXAMINER

"Describe the anterior approach to the hip (Smith-Petersen). What is the internervous plane and what structures are at risk?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
The Smith-Petersen anterior approach to the hip is performed with the patient **supine**. The incision is made from 2cm distal and lateral to the ASIS, curving distally toward the greater trochanter, typically 10-15cm long. The key is the **internervous plane** between tensor fasciae latae laterally (supplied by the superior gluteal nerve) and sartorius medially (supplied by the femoral nerve). This is a true internervous plane, making it safe for extensive dissection without risk of motor denervation. After incising skin and subcutaneous tissue, I identify the **lateral femoral cutaneous nerve** which crosses the field from lateral to medial. I either protect it by retracting medially or accept division with patient counseling about meralgia paresthetica (10-20% risk). The fascia is opened in line with the muscular interval. Deep dissection develops the plane between TFL and sartorius, exposing the **rectus femoris** which lies between them. The **ascending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery** runs between rectus and TFL and must be ligated for hemostasis. Structures at risk include: 1. **LFCN** - injury causes meralgia paresthetica (anterolateral thigh numbness) 2. **Femoral nerve** - lies medial to the field deep to sartorius. Stretch injury from excessive retraction causes quadriceps weakness. 3. **Lateral circumflex femoral vessels** - require ligation 4. **Superior gluteal nerve** - to TFL, but rarely injured if staying superficial to muscle The approach provides excellent exposure of the **anterior hip capsule** and can be extended proximally (iliofemoral extension) for full acetabular visualization.
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Anterior Approach for THA

EXAMINER

"You are performing a primary THA via the direct anterior approach. After femoral neck osteotomy, you are having difficulty accessing the femoral canal due to a muscular thigh. What are your options?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Femoral exposure is the **limiting factor** in anterior approach THA, particularly in muscular or obese patients. I would work through a systematic approach to optimize exposure: **Step 1: Optimize Hip Position** - Ensure adequate **hip extension** by dropping the leg off the side of the table or using a femoral positioner - Increase **external rotation** to bring the proximal femur anteriorly into the field - Release any soft tissue tethering posteriorly **Step 2: Check Retraction** - Ensure bent Hohmann retractor is properly placed around posterior femoral neck - Consider additional anterior retractor to elevate proximal femur - Use assistant to maintain position **Step 3: Extend Wound if Needed** - **Distal extension** of incision improves femoral access - Incise fascia further distally - Consider releasing more TFL to improve lateral visualization - Wound extension is not a failure - it is appropriate when exposure is inadequate **Step 4: Use Fluoroscopy** - Intraoperative imaging can guide broach direction when direct visualization is limited - Check broach position in AP and lateral before proceeding **If still inadequate after these steps:** - **Consider conversion** to posterior or lateral approach - This is rare but appropriate if safe femoral preparation is not possible - Extend skin incision posteriorly and develop posterolateral interval **Prevention of complications:** - Recognize difficult exposure early - don't force instrumentation - Proximal femoral fracture risk is higher with limited visualization - Varus stem positioning more likely if alignment cannot be confirmed I would counsel the patient preoperatively that **wound extension or approach conversion** is possible in difficult anatomy, and this is done for safety, not due to technical failure.
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Postoperative Complications

EXAMINER

"A patient returns 2 weeks after anterior approach THA with anterolateral thigh numbness and dysesthesia. What is the likely diagnosis and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has developed **meralgia paresthetica** due to lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury during surgery. This is the most common nerve complication of the anterior approach with an incidence of 10-20%. **Diagnosis:** The **LFCN** is a pure sensory nerve (L2-L3 roots) that crosses the surgical field from lateral to medial, usually passing under or through the inguinal ligament near the ASIS. Injury causes numbness, dysesthesia, or neuropathic pain in the anterolateral thigh distribution. There is no motor component, so strength is preserved (distinguishes from femoral nerve injury). **Clinical assessment:** - Document distribution of numbness (anterolateral thigh) - Assess for neuropathic pain vs pure numbness - Ensure no quadriceps weakness (would indicate femoral nerve) - Examine wound for hematoma or infection **Management:** I would counsel the patient with a structured approach: **Natural history:** - Most LFCN injuries are **neuropraxia and recover spontaneously** - Recovery timeline: 6-12 months typical - Permanent numbness occurs in approximately 5-10% of cases - Pure numbness is usually well-tolerated once patient is reassured **Symptomatic treatment:** - **If neuropathic pain**: Gabapentin or pregabalin - **If localized pain**: Trial of lidocaine patch - **Severe cases**: Referral to pain medicine for nerve block **Reassurance:** - Emphasize this is a **known risk** of anterior approach (should have been consented) - Sensation often improves over time - Functional impact is minimal (sensory only, no motor weakness) - Surgical exploration is rarely indicated and outcomes are poor **Follow-up:** - Reassess at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months - Document recovery trajectory - If no improvement by 6-12 months, counsel regarding likely permanence **Red flags that would warrant further investigation:** - Quadriceps weakness (femoral nerve injury) - Progressive symptoms (wound hematoma compressing nerve) - Severe pain refractory to medication (neuroma, nerve entrapment) The key is **expectant management with reassurance**, as most cases improve spontaneously. This complication should have been discussed during preoperative consent.

MCQ Practice Points

Internervous Plane Question

Q: What is the internervous plane in the Smith-Petersen anterior approach to the hip? A: Between tensor fasciae latae (supplied by superior gluteal nerve) and sartorius (supplied by femoral nerve). This is a true internervous plane with no motor nerve at risk within the interval.

Structure at Risk Question

Q: What is the most common nerve injury in anterior approach hip surgery and what are the symptoms? A: Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury occurs in 10-20% of cases. Symptoms are meralgia paresthetica: anterolateral thigh numbness and dysesthesia. This is a pure sensory nerve, so no motor weakness occurs.

Deep Anatomy Question

Q: What structure lies between the tensor fasciae latae and sartorius in the deep dissection and must be managed during exposure? A: Rectus femoris with its two heads (straight head from AIIS and reflected head from superior acetabular rim). The ascending branch of lateral circumflex femoral artery runs between rectus and TFL and must be ligated.

Indication Question

Q: What are the main indications for the Smith-Petersen anterior approach with iliofemoral extension? A: Acetabular fracture fixation (anterior column, both-column patterns), periacetabular osteotomy for DDH, and complex hip reconstruction. The extensile nature allows 360-degree acetabular visualization.

Complication Prevention Question

Q: How do you prevent femoral nerve injury during anterior approach hip surgery? A: The femoral nerve lies medial to the field deep to sartorius. Prevent injury by: (1) avoiding excessive medial retraction, (2) releasing self-retaining retractors periodically, (3) keeping dissection in the lateral interval, and (4) protecting during closure.

Australian Context

Local considerations:

  • Anterior approach THA (DAA) has variable adoption across Australia
  • Major arthroplasty centers often have surgeons trained in DAA
  • Learning curve considerations for emerging surgeons
  • AOANJRR tracks approach-specific outcomes

Medicolegal considerations:

  • Informed consent must specifically mention LFCN injury risk
  • Document discussion of meralgia paresthetica (10-20% incidence)
  • Mention possibility of wound extension or approach conversion for difficult femoral exposure
  • Standard precautions for DVT prophylaxis per ACSQHC guidelines

Equipment availability:

  • Specialized DAA tables available at major centers
  • Standard operating table adequate for Smith-Petersen for acetabular work
  • Familiarity with equipment before attempting approach

HIP ANTERIOR APPROACH (SMITH-PETERSEN)

High-Yield Exam Summary