Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • For Training Programs
  • Authors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Methodology
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Back to Operative Surgery
Trauma

Hip Anterior Approach (Smith-Petersen)

Comprehensive guide to the anterior approach to the hip (Smith-Petersen) - indications, internervous plane, step-by-step technique, structures at risk, and surgical decision-making for orthopaedic fellowship exam

Core Procedure
advanced
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Orthopaedic clinicians and medical editors • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Editorial boardMethodologyReview policyReport a correction
High Yield Overview

HIP ANTERIOR APPROACH (SMITH-PETERSEN)

Internervous Plane | Femoral Nerve at Risk | Extensile for Acetabular Access

TAN-SRInterval: Tensor (sup gluteal) vs Sartorius (femoral)
LFCNLateral femoral cutaneous nerve at risk
360°Full acetabular access possible
DDHIdeal for developmental dysplasia surgery

INDICATIONS

Arthroplasty
PatternTotal hip via direct anterior approach (DAA)
TreatmentMinimally invasive option
Acetabular
PatternAcetabular fractures, PAO, shelf procedures
TreatmentExtensile with iliofemoral extension
Pediatric
PatternDDH open reduction, Pemberton osteotomy
TreatmentStandard approach

Critical Must-Knows

  • Internervous plane between tensor fasciae latae (superior gluteal) and sartorius (femoral nerve)
  • LFCN crosses the field - at risk for meralgia paresthetica (10-20% incidence)
  • Extensile approach - can extend with iliofemoral exposure for full acetabular access
  • Supine positioning allows simultaneous bilateral procedures and easier anesthesia
  • Femoral nerve and vessels lie medial to sartorius - excessive retraction risks stretch injury

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Smith-Petersen described this approach in 1917 for hip arthrodesis
  • "
    True internervous plane makes it safe for extensive dissection
  • "
    DAA (Direct Anterior Approach) for THA is a variant using same interval
  • "
    Can extend proximally (iliofemoral) for full acetabular exposure in trauma

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

*/}

Critical Anterior Approach Exam Points

Internervous Plane

True internervous plane between TFL (superior gluteal nerve) and sartorius (femoral nerve). This makes the approach safe for extensive dissection without motor nerve injury risk. The interval is between rectus femoris medially and TFL laterally in the deep plane.

LFCN Preservation

Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve crosses the surgical field lateral to medial. Injury causes meralgia paresthetica (anterolateral thigh numbness). Incidence 10-20%. Identify and protect or accept division with patient counseling.

Femoral Neurovascular Bundle

The femoral nerve, artery, and vein lie medial to sartorius. Excessive medial retraction or prolonged retractor pressure risks femoral nerve stretch injury. Use self-retaining retractors carefully and release periodically.

Extensile Capability

Can be extended proximally with iliofemoral extension for full acetabular access (360 degrees). Requires detachment of external oblique from iliac crest and reflection of iliacus. Essential for acetabular fractures and complex reconstructions.

Quick Decision Guide - When to Use Anterior Approach

Clinical ScenarioIndication StrengthKey AdvantageMain Risk
Primary THA (young, active)Preferred by some surgeonsMuscle-sparing, faster recoveryLearning curve, LFCN injury
Acetabular fracture fixationGold standard for anterior column/wallFull acetabular visualization with extensionHeterotopic ossification risk
DDH reconstruction (PAO, Pemberton)Standard approachAcetabular reorientation accessNeed to protect LFCN in children
Hip arthrodesisHistorical indicationWide exposure for fusion preparationRarely performed now
Mnemonic

SARTOR-TANSARTOR-TAN - The Interval Muscles

S
Sartorius
Medial border - femoral nerve
A
ASIS origin
Sartorius originates from ASIS
R
Rectus femoris
Deep layer - lies between the two
T
Tensor fasciae latae
Lateral border - superior gluteal nerve
O
Origin lateral ASIS
TFL originates lateral to ASIS
R
Retract carefully
Protect LFCN crossing the field

Memory Hook:SARTOR is the tailor (sartorius muscle) who sits cross-legged - medial border of the interval. TAN is tensor - lateral border!

Mnemonic

LFCNLFCN - Structure at Risk

L
Lateral femoral cutaneous
Sensory nerve only
F
From L2-L3 roots
Emerges at lateral border of psoas
C
Crosses under/through inguinal ligament
Near ASIS - variable anatomy
N
Numbness if injured
Meralgia paresthetica - anterolateral thigh

Memory Hook:The LFCN is Like Finding a Crossing Nerve - it crosses the operative field and is hard to see consistently!

Mnemonic

SAFESAFE RETRACTION - Avoiding Complications

S
Self-retaining retractors
Use with caution - release periodically
A
Avoid medial pressure
Femoral nerve vulnerable to stretch
F
Flex hip
Hip flexion relaxes anterior structures
E
External rotation
Hip external rotation improves femoral exposure

Memory Hook:Keep retraction SAFE to protect the femoral nerve and vessels lying medially!

Overview and Historical Context

The Smith-Petersen anterior approach to the hip was first described by Marius Nygaard Smith-Petersen in 1917 for hip arthrodesis. It utilizes a true internervous plane between the tensor fasciae latae (superior gluteal nerve) and sartorius (femoral nerve), making it one of the safest approaches for extensive hip surgery.

Historical evolution:

  • 1917: Original description by Smith-Petersen for arthrodesis
  • 1950s-1970s: Used for acetabular fractures and complex hip reconstruction
  • 2000s: Revival as Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty
  • Current: Standard for acetabular surgery, growing use for minimally invasive THA

Modern applications:

  1. Total hip arthroplasty - Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) variant
  2. Acetabular fracture fixation - anterior column, anterior wall, both-column patterns
  3. Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) - for developmental dysplasia of hip
  4. Pediatric hip surgery - DDH open reduction, pelvic osteotomies
  5. Hip arthroscopy - anterior portal placement uses same landmarks

Why This Approach Matters

The anterior approach is the only true internervous plane approach to the hip. This anatomical advantage makes it safe for extensive dissection and explains its continued use for complex acetabular work despite the learning curve required.

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Surface anatomy:

  • ASIS - primary landmark, palpable anteriorly
  • Iliac crest - extends posteriorly from ASIS
  • Femoral pulse - marks position of femoral artery (medial to field)
  • Greater trochanter - palpable laterally

Deep structures:

  • Rectus femoris - two heads (straight and reflected) must be identified and retracted
  • Hip capsule - accessed between rectus and TFL after muscle retraction
  • Iliopsoas - lies on medial aspect of capsule
  • Ascending branch of lateral circumflex femoral artery - between TFL and rectus, requires ligation

Acetabular anatomy (for extensile exposure):

  • Anterior column - from iliac crest to pubic symphysis
  • Anterior wall - anterior rim of acetabulum
  • Quadrilateral plate - medial wall visualization possible
  • Ilioinguinal ligament - released for distal extension

Internervous Plane

True Internervous Plane: The approach exploits the interval between the Tensor Fasciae Latae (myotome L4-S1) and the Sartorius (myotome L2-L3).

StructureNerve SupplyPositionFunction
Tensor fasciae latae (TFL)Superior gluteal nerve (L4-S1)Lateral border of intervalHip flexion, abduction, internal rotation
SartoriusFemoral nerve (L2-L3)Medial border of intervalHip flexion, external rotation (longest muscle)
Rectus femorisFemoral nerve (L2-L4)Deep to interval - between TFL and sartoriusHip flexion, knee extension (crosses two joints)

Classification Systems

Approach Variants Classification:

Smith-Petersen Approach Variants

VariantKey FeaturePrimary UseModifications
Classic Smith-PetersenCurved incision from ASIS to GTAcetabular fractures, PAOCan extend iliofemoral
Direct Anterior Approach (DAA)Longitudinal incision between ASIS-GTTotal hip arthroplastyMinimally invasive variant
Hueter ApproachMore medial interval emphasisTHA (historical)Similar to DAA
Extended IliofemoralProximal extension along iliac crestAcetabular fracturesFull 360-degree access

The approach variant chosen depends primarily on the indication and required exposure.

LFCN Anatomical Variations (Sartorius Classification):

The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve has significant anatomical variability, impacting surgical planning.

LFCN Course Variations

TypeCourseIncidenceSurgical Implication
Type APosterior to ASIS, under inguinal ligament45%Standard - identify and protect
Type BThrough sartorius muscle belly20%Higher injury risk
Type CMedial to ASIS15%May be outside field
Type DThrough inguinal ligament15%Variable course distally
Type EMultiple branches5%Cannot protect all branches

Pre-operative counseling about LFCN injury risk is essential given the variable anatomy.

Acetabular Fracture Classification (Judet-Letournel):

For acetabular work via this approach, understand the fracture patterns.

Elementary types (5):

  • Anterior wall
  • Anterior column
  • Posterior wall
  • Posterior column
  • Transverse

Associated types (5):

  • Both-column
  • T-shaped
  • Transverse + posterior wall
  • Anterior column/posterior hemitransverse
  • Anterior wall/posterior hemitransverse

Smith-Petersen approach (with iliofemoral extension) is indicated for:

  • Anterior column fractures
  • Anterior wall fractures
  • Both-column fractures
  • Anterior column + posterior hemitransverse

Classification Pearl

Both-column fractures are the most common associated acetabular fracture pattern (25%). Despite involving both columns, they can often be treated via an extended Smith-Petersen alone because fixing both columns to the intact ilium stabilizes the fracture without requiring posterior access.

Clinical Assessment

Preoperative Patient Selection:

Ideal candidates for anterior approach THA:

  • BMI under 35 (obesity increases difficulty)
  • Normal femoral anatomy (not severe retroversion/valgus)
  • No previous anterior hip surgery
  • Preserved hip flexion (over 90 degrees)
  • Primary arthroplasty (revisions more challenging)

Physical examination findings:

  • Hip range of motion assessment
  • Flexion contracture evaluation
  • Leg length discrepancy measurement
  • Neurovascular status (especially LFCN distribution)
  • Skin quality over anterior approach

Contraindications/caution:

  • Morbid obesity (BMI over 40)
  • Severe femoral retroversion or valgus deformity
  • Proximal femoral hardware or deformity
  • Previous anterior approach surgery
  • Ankylosed hip

Careful patient selection optimizes outcomes for anterior approach THA.

History and mechanism:

  • High-energy trauma (dashboard injury, fall from height)
  • Associated injuries (Letournel: 40% have other significant injuries)
  • Time from injury (ideally surgery within 5-14 days)
  • Medical optimization status

Physical examination:

  • Hemodynamic stability (retroperitoneal hemorrhage common)
  • Sciatic nerve function (10% of posterior fracture-dislocations)
  • Skin integrity (Morel-Lavallee lesion assessment)
  • Associated lower extremity injuries

Red flags requiring urgent intervention:

  • Open fracture
  • Irreducible dislocation
  • Sciatic nerve deficit with displaced fragment
  • Vascular compromise

Red flags require urgent surgical intervention within 24-48 hours.

Clinical assessment:

  • Walking pattern (if ambulatory)
  • Leg length discrepancy
  • Range of motion assessment
  • Galeazzi sign (leg appears short in flexion)
  • Trendelenburg test

Age-specific considerations:

  • 6-18 months: Open reduction candidacy
  • 18 months - 6 years: PAO or Pemberton consideration
  • Over 6 years: Salvage procedures (shelf, Chiari)

Imaging correlation required:

  • Ultrasound (under 6 months)
  • AP pelvis radiograph
  • CT arthrography for surgical planning

Imaging modality selection is age-dependent for pediatric DDH assessment.

Investigations

Imaging Assessment:

Plain Radiographs

Standard views:

  • AP pelvis (bilateral comparison)
  • Lateral hip (cross-table or frog-leg)
  • Judet views for acetabular fracture (obturator oblique, iliac oblique)

What to assess:

  • Femoral anteversion (templating)
  • Acetabular version and coverage
  • Bone quality (osteoporosis indicators)
  • Previous hardware or deformity

CT Scan

Indications:

  • Acetabular fractures (essential for classification)
  • Complex deformity (DDH, Paget's)
  • Revision surgery planning
  • 3D reconstruction for surgical planning

Key information:

  • Fracture pattern and displacement
  • Marginal impaction assessment
  • Fragment size and location
  • Sciatic buttress involvement

Additional Investigations:

InvestigationIndicationKey Information
MRI hipOsteonecrosis, labral pathology, soft tissueCartilage assessment, femoral head viability
CT angiographyVascular injury concern (trauma)Femoral/iliac vessel patency
Bone density (DEXA)Osteoporosis screening (over 65)Fracture risk, implant selection
EMG/NCSPreoperative nerve dysfunctionBaseline for medicolegal purposes

Preoperative Laboratory Studies:

  • Full blood count (hemoglobin, platelets)
  • Coagulation screen (for trauma)
  • Group and hold (THA) or cross-match (trauma)
  • Renal function (contrast/medication adjustment)
  • Blood glucose (diabetes optimization)

Investigation Priority

For acetabular fractures, CT with 3D reconstruction is mandatory for surgical planning and approach selection. The Judet radiographs are useful for initial classification but CT provides the definitive assessment of fracture pattern, marginal impaction, and posterior wall integrity.

Management Algorithm

Decision tree flowchart for Anterior Hip Approach indication selection
Click to expand
Surgical decision-making for Anterior Hip Approach: Choosing between DAA, Smith-Petersen, and Extensions based on pathology (THA, Trauma, DDH).Credit: MedVellum AI Illustration

Decision Algorithm - Approach Selection:

Surgical Decision-Making Process

AssessmentStep 1: Define Indication

THA: Consider DAA variant. Acetabular fracture: Smith-Petersen with extension. DDH reconstruction: Classic Smith-Petersen. Combined pathology: Plan extensile approach.

Patient SelectionStep 2: Assess Patient Factors

BMI and body habitus. Previous surgery and scarring. Bone quality and anatomy. Medical comorbidities. Expected compliance.

Technical FactorsStep 3: Surgeon Experience

Learning curve consideration (DAA: 30-50 cases). Equipment availability (fracture table, specialized retractors). Team familiarity with approach. Backup plan if difficulties encountered.

Preoperative PlanStep 4: Procedure Planning

Template implants (THA). Plate and screw selection (fracture). Fluoroscopy requirements. Table and positioning needs.

The decision pathway should systematically address all factors before committing to approach selection.

Approach Selection by Indication:

Indication-Based Approach Selection

Clinical ScenarioRecommended ApproachAlternativeKey Consideration
Primary THA, suitable anatomyDAA (anterior)PosteriorSurgeon experience paramount
THA with severe obesityPosterior or lateralExtended DAAFemoral access challenging anterior
Anterior column fractureSmith-Petersen + extensionIlioinguinalFull column visualization
Both-column fractureExtended Smith-PetersenCombined approachesOften single approach sufficient
DDH - open reductionAnterior approachMedial approach (infants)Age-dependent selection
Periacetabular osteotomySmith-PetersenModified Smith-PetersenMust access all osteotomy sites

Choose the approach based on surgeon experience and patient-specific factors.

When to Avoid Anterior Approach

Relative contraindications to anterior approach:

Consider alternative approaches when encountering:

  • Revision THA with significant proximal femoral bone loss
  • Periprosthetic fracture extending to greater trochanter
  • Infection with planned debridement and implant exchange
  • Severe femoral deformity requiring osteotomy
  • Previous anterior approach with extensive scarring

In these scenarios, posterior or lateral approaches provide better exposure and are safer options.

Recognizing when NOT to use the anterior approach is as important as knowing when to use it.

Indications and Patient Selection

Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) for THA:

Ideal candidates:

  • Young, active patients seeking faster recovery
  • Normal to increased femoral anteversion
  • Non-obese patients (BMI under 35 preferred)
  • Primary THA with normal anatomy

Relative contraindications:

  • Severe obesity (BMI over 40) - difficult femoral exposure
  • Severe retroversion or valgus femur - challenging femoral preparation
  • Previous anterior hip surgery - scarring complicates dissection
  • Severe flexion contracture - limits femoral access

Advantages:

  • True muscle-sparing approach
  • Lower dislocation risk (theoretically)
  • Faster early recovery and mobilization
  • Supine positioning allows bilateral procedures

Disadvantages:

  • Steep learning curve (30-50 cases)
  • Limited femoral exposure (difficult revisions)
  • LFCN injury risk
  • Specialized table/equipment often used

This approach has gained significant popularity as the DAA for THA due to perceived faster recovery, though long-term outcomes are similar to other approaches.

Gold standard for anterior acetabular access:

Ideal fracture patterns:

  • Anterior column fractures
  • Anterior wall fractures
  • Both-column fractures (can access both columns)
  • T-type fractures (with posterior approach)

Surgical approach: Standard Smith-Petersen with iliofemoral extension:

  • Allows 360-degree acetabular visualization
  • Access to inner and outer tables
  • Quadrilateral plate visualization
  • Superior dome visualization

Key steps for fracture work:

  1. Expose anterior column along pelvic brim
  2. Detach external oblique from iliac crest for proximal extension
  3. Reflect iliacus from inner table
  4. Visualize fracture lines and reduction
  5. Apply reconstruction plate along pelvic brim

The extensile nature of this approach makes it essential for acetabular fracture surgeons.

Developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH):

Procedures via anterior approach:

  • Open reduction of DDH (age 6-18 months)
  • Pemberton osteotomy (acetabuloplasty)
  • Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) - adolescents and adults
  • Shelf procedures for acetabular dysplasia

Advantages in children:

  • Excellent acetabular exposure
  • Safe plane (no motor nerve risk)
  • Can address both femoral and acetabular pathology
  • Lower infection risk than medial approach

Technical considerations:

  • LFCN in children is more medial - protect carefully
  • Smaller working space requires fine instruments
  • Cartilage injury risk at margins of capsulotomy

This is the standard approach for most pediatric hip reconstruction procedures.

Additional uses:

Tumor resection:

  • Access to anterior iliac tumors
  • Combined with lateral window for total hip reconstruction after tumor

Hip arthrodesis:

  • Historical indication (Smith-Petersen's original use)
  • Wide exposure for joint preparation and fixation
  • Rarely performed in modern practice

Iliopsoas tenotomy:

  • Symptomatic iliopsoas impingement after THA
  • Lesser trochanter access

Hip arthroscopy portal placement:

  • Anterior portal uses same internervous plane
  • Familiarity with anatomy reduces neurovascular injury risk

The versatility of this approach explains its continued relevance across subspecialties.

Positioning

Patient position: Supine

Positioning Steps

Step 1Anesthesia
  • General or spinal anesthesia
  • Ensure adequate muscle relaxation
  • Discuss with anesthesia team: hypotensive technique for trauma (reduced blood loss)
Step 2Supine on radiolucent table
  • Standard operating table or specialized fracture/arthroplasty table
  • For THA: Some surgeons use specialized DAA table with femoral positioner
  • For fracture: Standard table with C-arm access
Step 3Padding and pressure areas
  • Occiput padded
  • Arms positioned on arm boards (abducted under 90 degrees)
  • Sacrum and heels padded
  • Non-operative leg: slight hip flexion and abduction
Step 4Image intensifier positioning
  • C-arm from contralateral side for AP views
  • Ensure clear AP pelvis and lateral hip imaging possible
  • For fracture: inlet and obturator oblique views must be achievable
Step 5Skin preparation
  • From umbilicus to mid-thigh
  • From midline anteriorly to posterior axillary line laterally
  • Chlorhexidine or betadine per protocol
  • Draping: Include anterior iliac crest and proximal thigh

Positioning Advantages

Supine positioning is a major advantage of the anterior approach:

  • Easier for anesthesia (better respiratory mechanics)
  • Allows bilateral simultaneous procedures for bilateral hip disease
  • C-arm access for intraoperative imaging without repositioning
  • Familiar positioning for surgical team reduces setup time

Surgical Technique

Surface Landmarks and Incision

Palpable landmarks:

  • ASIS (anterior superior iliac spine) - primary landmark
  • Greater trochanter - lateral and distal
  • Femoral pulse - medial (marks neurovascular bundle)

Incision options:

Standard Smith-Petersen (for acetabular work):

  • Start 2cm distal and lateral to ASIS
  • Curve distally and laterally toward greater trochanter
  • Length: 10-15cm (can extend as needed)
  • Stays lateral to neurovascular bundle

Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) for THA:

  • Longitudinal incision between ASIS and greater trochanter
  • Length: 8-10cm for minimally invasive technique
  • Centered over palpable interval between TFL and sartorius

Avoid Medial Deviation

Keep incision lateral to the femoral pulse. Medial deviation risks injury to femoral neurovascular structures. Mark the femoral pulse before draping and plan incision lateral to this.

Superficial Layer Dissection

Step 1: Incise skin and subcutaneous tissue

  • Deepen through subcutaneous fat using cutting diathermy
  • Ligate or cauterize superficial vessels
  • Look for LFCN in subcutaneous layer

Step 2: Identify and manage LFCN

  • Runs from lateral to medial, usually 1-2cm distal to ASIS
  • Variable anatomy: may pass under, through, or lateral to inguinal ligament
  • Options: (1) identify and retract medially (preserve), or (2) divide and bury if tented
  • Counsel patient preoperatively about meralgia paresthetica risk (10-20%)

Step 3: Identify fascia and muscular interval

  • Identify fascia lata and fascia over TFL
  • Palpate interval between TFL (lateral - taught, band-like) and sartorius (medial - softer)
  • Mark interval with electrocautery

LFCN Identification

The LFCN is not always identifiable despite careful dissection. Variable anatomy means it may be subfascial or have multiple branches. Some surgeons accept division and counsel patients preoperatively. Others use a more medial skin incision to avoid it entirely.

Deep Interval Development

Step 1: Open fascia in line with interval

  • Incise fascia between TFL (lateral) and sartorius (medial)
  • Interval typically easy to identify by palpation
  • Extend incision proximally to just below inguinal ligament

Step 2: Develop internervous plane

  • Blunt dissection between TFL and sartorius
  • This is a true internervous plane: TFL (superior gluteal), sartorius (femoral)
  • Place retractors: self-retaining with care, or hand-held initially

Step 3: Identify and manage rectus femoris

  • Rectus lies deep in the interval
  • Two heads: straight head (AIIS) and reflected head (superior acetabular rim)
  • For THA: retract rectus medially with iliopsoas
  • For acetabular work: may need to release reflected head for better visualization

Step 4: Ligate ascending branch of LCFA

  • Lateral circumflex femoral artery ascending branch runs between rectus and TFL
  • Must be identified and ligated for hemostasis
  • Use ties or clips - avoid diathermy near nerve
  • This is a consistent bleeder if not addressed early

Femoral Nerve Protection

The femoral nerve lies medial to the operative field deep to sartorius. Excessive medial retraction or prolonged retractor pressure causes stretch neuropraxia. Manifest as postoperative quadriceps weakness and loss of knee extension.

Prevention: Use self-retaining retractors cautiously, release periodically, minimize medial retraction force.

A clear understanding of the deep anatomy is essential for safe execution of this approach.

Hip Capsule Exposure and Capsulotomy

Step 1: Reflect muscles from capsule

  • Retract TFL laterally
  • Retract sartorius and rectus femoris medially
  • Identify anterior hip capsule

Step 2: Hip capsulotomy pattern

For THA:

  • Capsular release: T-shaped or inverted L
  • Longitudinal limb along femoral neck
  • Transverse limb along acetabular rim
  • Excise or preserve capsule per surgeon preference

For acetabular fracture:

  • Limited capsulotomy or capsulectomy
  • Goal is exposure of anterior column and acetabular rim
  • May need to release reflected head of rectus

For pediatric DDH:

  • Anterior capsular flap based superiorly
  • Preserve capsule for closure
  • Open transversely to visualize femoral head

Step 3: Identify key landmarks

  • Femoral neck anteriorly
  • Acetabular rim superiorly
  • Transverse acetabular ligament and labrum
  • Ligamentum teres (if preserved)

Capsular Management

Capsular management is controversial in THA. Some surgeons excise anterior capsule for better exposure and lower dislocation risk (rare in anterior approach anyway). Others preserve and repair capsule for improved stability and proprioception.

The capsulotomy pattern depends on the indication and surgeon preference for capsular repair.

Femoral Exposure (for THA/Hip Arthroplasty)

Challenge: Limited femoral access compared to posterior/lateral approaches

Step 1: Position hip for femoral exposure

  • Extend hip by dropping leg off side of table or using femoral positioner
  • Externally rotate hip to bring proximal femur into field
  • Flexion of hip relaxes anterior structures for neck osteotomy

Step 2: Perform femoral neck osteotomy

  • In situ osteotomy with oscillating saw
  • Cut at predetermined level (preoperative templating)
  • Remove femoral head with corkscrew or bone hook

Step 3: Access femoral canal

  • Place bent Hohmann retractor around proximal femur
  • Elevate proximal femur anteriorly
  • Externally rotate and extend hip to bring femur into operative field
  • Use specialized femoral elevator/positioner if available

Step 4: Prepare femoral canal

  • Broach or ream per implant system
  • Limited visualization - rely on tactile feedback and fluoroscopy
  • Higher learning curve than posterior approach for femoral preparation

Pitfalls:

  • Proximal femoral fracture during broaching due to limited visualization
  • Varus stem position if not carefully aligned
  • Wound extension required in difficult cases (muscular patients, abnormal anatomy)

Femoral Exposure Challenges

Femoral exposure is the limiting factor in anterior approach THA. Difficult in:

  • Muscular patients with large thighs
  • Obese patients (BMI over 35)
  • Severe retroversion or valgus femur
  • Revision surgery with proximal femoral bone loss

Be prepared to extend wound or convert to alternate approach in difficult cases.

Mastery of femoral exposure techniques is critical for successful anterior approach THA.

Iliofemoral Extension (for Acetabular Fracture Work)

Indication: Full acetabular visualization for fracture fixation

Step 1: Proximal extension of skin incision

  • Extend incision proximally along iliac crest
  • Can curve posteriorly to greater sciatic notch if needed
  • Subperiosteal dissection along iliac crest

Step 2: Detach external oblique from iliac crest

  • Release abdominal muscles (external oblique, internal oblique, transversus) from iliac crest
  • Elevate anteriorly to expose inner table of ilium
  • Preserve lateral cutaneous nerve of thigh (iliohypogastric)

Step 3: Reflect iliacus from inner table

  • Subperiosteal dissection of iliacus from inner pelvic wall
  • Work from lateral to medial
  • Exposes pelvic brim and quadrilateral plate

Step 4: Visualize acetabulum

  • Full 360-degree visualization possible
  • Anterior column along pelvic brim
  • Anterior wall and dome
  • Posterior column (limited - may need separate incision)
  • Quadrilateral plate medially

Step 5: Fracture reduction and fixation

  • Reduce fracture with pointed reduction forceps
  • Temporary K-wire fixation
  • Apply reconstruction plate along pelvic brim (typical for anterior column)
  • Multiple screw fixation into columns

Both-Column Fractures

Both-column acetabular fractures can often be treated via extended Smith-Petersen alone. The fracture is "fixed" when both columns are stabilized to the intact ilium. Lag screw across posterior column into intact ilium plus plate on anterior column achieves this without posterior approach.

The extensile capability of this approach makes it invaluable for complex acetabular reconstruction.

Structures at Risk

Structures at Risk

Primary risks:

  1. LFCN - crosses field from lateral to medial under inguinal ligament. Injury rate 10-20% causing meralgia paresthetica.
  2. Femoral nerve - lies medial to sartorius. Stretch injury from excessive medial retraction causes quadriceps weakness and loss of knee extension.
  3. Lateral circumflex femoral vessels - deep branch (ascending) runs between rectus and TFL. Must be ligated for hemostasis.
  4. Superior gluteal nerve - lateral to TFL, rarely injured if staying in superficial plane.

Vascular:

  • Ascending branch of lateral circumflex femoral artery: Consistent bleeder in the interval.
  • Femoral Artery: Medial to sartorius, at risk with excessive medial retraction.

Nerve:

  • LFCN: Most common injury (sensory).
  • Femoral Nerve: Motor injury (quadriceps).

Wound Closure

Wound closure:

Closure Steps

Layer 1Capsule
  • If preserved: Repair capsule with interrupted absorbable sutures
  • If excised: Proceed to fascial closure (for THA)
  • For fracture/pediatric: Always repair capsule for stability
Layer 2Fascia
  • Repair TFL-sartorius interval if opened widely
  • Usually not necessary for limited THA incision
  • Use absorbable suture (0 or 1 Vicryl)
Layer 3Subcutaneous
  • Close dead space with 2-0 Vicryl
  • Ensure hemostasis - anterior approach can have significant bleeding
  • Drain placement controversial (author preference for acetabular fracture, not for THA)
Layer 4Skin
  • Subcuticular 3-0 Monocryl or skin staples
  • Skin adhesive or sterile strips
  • Waterproof dressing

Complications and Management

Complications of Anterior Hip Approach

ComplicationIncidencePrevention/Management
LFCN injury (meralgia paresthetica)10-20% (temporary or permanent)Careful dissection, identify and protect, counsel preoperatively
Femoral nerve neuropraxia1-3% (usually temporary)Avoid excessive medial retraction, release retractors periodically
Lateral circumflex femoral vessel injuryCommon (manageable)Identify and ligate ascending branch early in dissection
Proximal femoral fracture (THA)1-2% (learning curve dependent)Careful broaching, fluoroscopy, avoid varus, extend wound if difficult
Heterotopic ossification (fracture)10-20% (higher for acetabular trauma)Indomethacin prophylaxis or radiation, minimize soft tissue stripping
Wound infection1-2% (THA), 5-10% (trauma)Standard prophylaxis, minimize tissue trauma, early antibiotics if suspected
Wound hematoma2-5%Careful hemostasis, consider drain for trauma cases

LFCN injury management:

  • Most recover spontaneously over 6-12 months
  • Temporary numbness common, permanent in 5-10%
  • Neuropathic pain (less common) may require gabapentin or nerve block
  • Surgical exploration rarely indicated

Femoral nerve stretch injury:

  • Presents as quadriceps weakness and loss of knee extension
  • Usually neuropraxia - recovers over weeks to months
  • EMG at 3-4 weeks if no recovery to confirm neuropraxia vs axonotmesis
  • Knee brace for stability during recovery
  • Physiotherapy for quadriceps strengthening

Complication Counseling

Preoperative counseling should specifically mention:

  • LFCN injury risk (10-20%) and meralgia paresthetica symptoms
  • Possibility of quadriceps weakness (femoral nerve)
  • Longer learning curve for surgeon (if within first 30-50 cases)
  • Potential for wound extension or approach conversion in difficult cases

Informed consent is particularly important for elective anterior approach THA given these specific risks.

Postoperative Care

Postoperative Protocol by Indication:

Day 0-1 (Immediate postoperative):

  • Early mobilization: same day or day 1
  • No hip precautions required (advantage of anterior approach)
  • Weight bearing as tolerated with walker or crutches
  • DVT prophylaxis: Aspirin 100mg BD or rivaroxaban 10mg daily
  • Multimodal analgesia: paracetamol, NSAIDs (if appropriate), opioids PRN
  • Ice and elevation

Day 1-14 (Early recovery):

  • Progress to cane or single crutch
  • Physiotherapy: gait training, hip strengthening
  • Wound check at day 14
  • Remove staples/sutures at 14 days

Week 2-6 (Rehabilitation):

  • Wean walking aids (typically by week 4-6)
  • Progressive strengthening exercises
  • Activity modification as tolerated
  • Drive when off narcotics and safe (typically 4-6 weeks)

6 weeks and beyond:

  • Review with X-ray
  • Return to full activities as tolerated
  • Sports typically allowed 3-6 months postoperatively

The absence of hip precautions facilitates faster functional recovery compared to posterior approach.

Immediate (Day 0-2):

  • Bed rest 24-48 hours
  • DVT prophylaxis essential (enoxaparin 40mg daily)
  • Heterotopic ossification prophylaxis: indomethacin 75mg daily for 3 weeks OR radiation (700cGy single dose)
  • Pain management: multimodal analgesia
  • Hemodynamic monitoring (retroperitoneal bleeding)

Week 1-6:

  • Touch weight bearing (maximum 10kg) for 6 weeks minimum
  • Early ROM exercises (passive then active)
  • DVT prophylaxis continues 4-6 weeks
  • Serial X-rays at 2, 6, 12 weeks

Week 6-12:

  • Progress weight bearing based on X-ray healing
  • Partial weight bearing if bridging callus visible
  • Full weight bearing typically by 12 weeks
  • Physiotherapy for strengthening

Long-term:

  • Risk of post-traumatic arthritis (10-50% depending on injury)
  • THA may be required (typically 5-20% at 10 years)
  • Monitor for heterotopic ossification symptoms

Anatomic reduction and HO prophylaxis are the two most important factors for long-term outcome.

DDH Open Reduction (Infant/Toddler):

  • Hip spica cast immediately postoperatively
  • Cast duration: 3 months (typically 6 weeks in "human position" then 6 weeks in abduction)
  • Parents education on cast care and positioning
  • Close follow-up with serial imaging

Periacetabular Osteotomy (Adolescent/Adult):

  • Touch weight bearing for 6 weeks
  • CPM or early ROM exercises
  • DVT prophylaxis for 4-6 weeks
  • Progress to full weight bearing by 8-12 weeks
  • Return to sports 4-6 months

Key monitoring:

  • Acetabular remodeling assessment
  • Femoral head coverage improvement
  • Pain and function improvement

Serial imaging confirms adequate coverage and guides return to activity decisions.

No Hip Precautions - Anterior Advantage

Unlike posterior approach THA, anterior approach THA does not require hip precautions. Patients can flex, adduct, and internally rotate without restriction. This contributes to faster early recovery and improved patient satisfaction in the first 6 weeks.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Expected Outcomes by Indication:

Outcome Summary - Anterior Hip Approach

IndicationSuccess RateKey MetricsCommon Issues
Primary THA95-98% at 10 yearsHHS improvement 40-50 points, dislocation 0.6-1%LFCN paresthesia 10-20%
Acetabular fracture ORIF70-90% anatomic reductionUnion 95%, post-traumatic OA 15-50%HO 10-20%, nerve injury 2-5%
DDH open reduction85-95% stable reductionAVN 0-5%, redislocation 5%Residual dysplasia may need PAO
PAO for dysplasia85-90% good/excellentPain relief 85%, survivorship 90% at 10 yearsNerve injury 2%, nonunion rare

THA Approach Comparison - Registry Data (AOANJRR 2023):

*/}

Key registry findings:

  • Anterior approach: 15% of primary THA in Australia
  • Posterior approach: 60% of primary THA
  • Revision rates similar across approaches at 10 years when performed by experienced surgeons
  • Dislocation rates: Anterior 0.6% less than Posterior 2-3% (without repair)
  • Learning curve evident: higher complication rates in first 30-50 cases

Prognosis Factors:

Positive Prognostic Factors

  • Experienced surgeon (over 50 anterior cases)
  • Appropriate patient selection (BMI under 35)
  • Primary procedure (not revision)
  • Good bone quality
  • Anatomic reduction (fracture)

Negative Prognostic Factors

  • Surgeon learning curve (under 30 cases)
  • Obesity (BMI over 35)
  • Complex anatomy or revision
  • Marginal impaction (fracture)
  • Delayed surgery over 14 days (fracture)

Long-term Considerations:

  • THA survivorship: 95% at 10 years, 80% at 20 years (approach independent)
  • Post-traumatic arthritis: 15-50% after acetabular fracture (dependent on reduction quality)
  • Heterotopic ossification: Higher with anterior/extensile approaches - prophylaxis recommended
  • Functional outcomes: Anterior approach shows faster early recovery (6 weeks) but equivalent at 1 year

Evidence Summary

No approach is superior for THA when performed by experienced surgeons. The anterior approach offers lower dislocation rates and faster early recovery, but these advantages are offset by LFCN injury rates and learning curve complications. Registry data shows equivalent 10-year revision rates across all approaches.

Evidence Base

Smith-Petersen Original Description

5
Smith-Petersen MN • J Orthop Surg (1917)
Key Findings:
  • Original description of anterior approach to hip for arthrodesis
  • Described internervous plane between TFL and sartorius
  • Emphasized safety of plane for extensive dissection
  • Enabled hip fusion procedures before advent of arthroplasty
Clinical Implication: Historical landmark paper establishing the anatomical foundation for all modern anterior hip approaches including DAA for THA.

Direct Anterior Approach Meta-analysis

3
Meermans et al • J Arthroplasty (2017)
Key Findings:
  • Meta-analysis comparing DAA to other approaches for THA
  • Faster early recovery (6 weeks) with DAA
  • No difference in outcomes at 1 year or beyond
  • Higher LFCN injury rate (10-20% vs under 1% for posterior)
  • Learning curve: 30-50 cases to plateau complication rate
Clinical Implication: DAA offers early recovery advantage but no long-term benefit over other approaches. LFCN injury is a consistent trade-off.
Limitation: Heterogeneity in surgical technique and experience levels across studies. Publication bias favoring DAA.

Acetabular Fracture Fixation via Smith-Petersen

4
Letournel E • Clin Orthop Relat Res (1993)
Key Findings:
  • Standard approach for anterior column and both-column acetabular fractures
  • Iliofemoral extension allows full acetabular visualization
  • Can address 360 degrees of acetabulum with proper extension
  • Outcomes depend on anatomic reduction and stable fixation
Clinical Implication: Smith-Petersen with iliofemoral extension remains gold standard for anterior acetabular access in trauma surgery.

LFCN Anatomical Variations and Injury Risk

3
de Ridder VA et al • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2019)
Key Findings:
  • Anatomical study documenting LFCN variability in anterior hip approach
  • Five distinct anatomical patterns identified
  • Type B (through sartorius) associated with highest injury risk
  • Injury rates 10-20% across all techniques, mostly temporary
  • Permanent meralgia paresthetica in 5% of cases
Clinical Implication: Counseling patients about LFCN injury risk is essential. Variable anatomy means nerve cannot always be protected despite careful technique.
Limitation: Anatomical study - clinical correlation based on retrospective data.

AOANJRR Approach Comparison Data

2
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry • Annual Report (2023)
Key Findings:
  • Posterior approach used in 60% of primary THA in Australia
  • Anterior approach rising to 15% utilization
  • No significant difference in 10-year revision rates between approaches
  • Surgeon experience remains strongest predictor of outcome
  • Hospital volume correlates with lower complication rates
Clinical Implication: Australian registry data supports equivalent outcomes across approaches when performed by experienced surgeons. Approach selection should be based on surgeon expertise and patient factors.
Limitation: Observational registry data - not randomized. Selection bias possible.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Describe the Approach

EXAMINER

"Describe the anterior approach to the hip (Smith-Petersen). What is the internervous plane and what structures are at risk?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
The Smith-Petersen anterior approach to the hip is performed with the patient **supine**. The incision is made from 2cm distal and lateral to the ASIS, curving distally toward the greater trochanter, typically 10-15cm long. The key is the **internervous plane** between tensor fasciae latae laterally (supplied by the superior gluteal nerve) and sartorius medially (supplied by the femoral nerve). This is a true internervous plane, making it safe for extensive dissection without risk of motor denervation. After incising skin and subcutaneous tissue, I identify the **lateral femoral cutaneous nerve** which crosses the field from lateral to medial. I either protect it by retracting medially or accept division with patient counseling about meralgia paresthetica (10-20% risk). The fascia is opened in line with the muscular interval. Deep dissection develops the plane between TFL and sartorius, exposing the **rectus femoris** which lies between them. The **ascending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery** runs between rectus and TFL and must be ligated for hemostasis. Structures at risk include: 1. **LFCN** - injury causes meralgia paresthetica (anterolateral thigh numbness) 2. **Femoral nerve** - lies medial to the field deep to sartorius. Stretch injury from excessive retraction causes quadriceps weakness. 3. **Lateral circumflex femoral vessels** - require ligation 4. **Superior gluteal nerve** - to TFL, but rarely injured if staying superficial to muscle The approach provides excellent exposure of the **anterior hip capsule** and can be extended proximally (iliofemoral extension) for full acetabular visualization.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Patient supine, incision from ASIS toward greater trochanter
Internervous plane: TFL (superior gluteal) vs sartorius (femoral)
True internervous plane - safe for extensive dissection
LFCN at risk - crosses field, 10-20% injury rate
Femoral nerve at risk - lies medially, stretch injury from retraction
Lateral circumflex femoral vessels must be ligated
Rectus femoris lies deep between TFL and sartorius
Can be extended for full acetabular access (iliofemoral extension)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not mentioning LFCN and meralgia paresthetica risk
✗Confusing nerve supply of TFL vs sartorius
✗Not identifying rectus femoris in deep dissection
✗Forgetting to ligate lateral circumflex femoral vessels
✗Not recognizing femoral nerve is at risk from medial retraction
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the incidence of LFCN injury and how do you counsel patients?"
"How would you extend this approach for an acetabular fracture?"
"What are the advantages and disadvantages compared to posterior approach for THA?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Anterior Approach for THA

EXAMINER

"You are performing a primary THA via the direct anterior approach. After femoral neck osteotomy, you are having difficulty accessing the femoral canal due to a muscular thigh. What are your options?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Femoral exposure is the **limiting factor** in anterior approach THA, particularly in muscular or obese patients. I would work through a systematic approach to optimize exposure: **Step 1: Optimize Hip Position** - Ensure adequate **hip extension** by dropping the leg off the side of the table or using a femoral positioner - Increase **external rotation** to bring the proximal femur anteriorly into the field - Release any soft tissue tethering posteriorly **Step 2: Check Retraction** - Ensure bent Hohmann retractor is properly placed around posterior femoral neck - Consider additional anterior retractor to elevate proximal femur - Use assistant to maintain position **Step 3: Extend Wound if Needed** - **Distal extension** of incision improves femoral access - Incise fascia further distally - Consider releasing more TFL to improve lateral visualization - Wound extension is not a failure - it is appropriate when exposure is inadequate **Step 4: Use Fluoroscopy** - Intraoperative imaging can guide broach direction when direct visualization is limited - Check broach position in AP and lateral before proceeding **If still inadequate after these steps:** - **Consider conversion** to posterior or lateral approach - This is rare but appropriate if safe femoral preparation is not possible - Extend skin incision posteriorly and develop posterolateral interval **Prevention of complications:** - Recognize difficult exposure early - don't force instrumentation - Proximal femoral fracture risk is higher with limited visualization - Varus stem positioning more likely if alignment cannot be confirmed I would counsel the patient preoperatively that **wound extension or approach conversion** is possible in difficult anatomy, and this is done for safety, not due to technical failure.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Femoral exposure is the main challenge in anterior approach THA
Optimize hip position: extension and external rotation
Use femoral elevator/positioner to lift proximal femur
Extend wound distally if needed - not a failure
Use fluoroscopy to guide broach direction if vision limited
Consider approach conversion if truly inadequate - rare but appropriate
Risk of proximal femoral fracture if forcing instruments
Higher in muscular patients, obesity (BMI over 35), abnormal femur anatomy
Preoperative counseling should mention possibility of wound extension
COMMON TRAPS
✗Forcing instrumentation with inadequate visualization
✗Not extending wound when needed
✗Causing proximal femoral fracture due to limited vision
✗Not using fluoroscopy as an adjunct
✗Being reluctant to convert to alternate approach if necessary
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"At what point would you convert to a different approach?"
"How do you prevent proximal femoral fracture during anterior approach?"
"What patient factors predict difficult femoral exposure?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Postoperative Complications

EXAMINER

"A patient returns 2 weeks after anterior approach THA with anterolateral thigh numbness and dysesthesia. What is the likely diagnosis and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has developed **meralgia paresthetica** due to lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury during surgery. This is the most common nerve complication of the anterior approach with an incidence of 10-20%. **Diagnosis:** The **LFCN** is a pure sensory nerve (L2-L3 roots) that crosses the surgical field from lateral to medial, usually passing under or through the inguinal ligament near the ASIS. Injury causes numbness, dysesthesia, or neuropathic pain in the anterolateral thigh distribution. There is no motor component, so strength is preserved (distinguishes from femoral nerve injury). **Clinical assessment:** - Document distribution of numbness (anterolateral thigh) - Assess for neuropathic pain vs pure numbness - Ensure no quadriceps weakness (would indicate femoral nerve) - Examine wound for hematoma or infection **Management:** I would counsel the patient with a structured approach: **Natural history:** - Most LFCN injuries are **neuropraxia and recover spontaneously** - Recovery timeline: 6-12 months typical - Permanent numbness occurs in approximately 5-10% of cases - Pure numbness is usually well-tolerated once patient is reassured **Symptomatic treatment:** - **If neuropathic pain**: Gabapentin or pregabalin - **If localized pain**: Trial of lidocaine patch - **Severe cases**: Referral to pain medicine for nerve block **Reassurance:** - Emphasize this is a **known risk** of anterior approach (should have been consented) - Sensation often improves over time - Functional impact is minimal (sensory only, no motor weakness) - Surgical exploration is rarely indicated and outcomes are poor **Follow-up:** - Reassess at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months - Document recovery trajectory - If no improvement by 6-12 months, counsel regarding likely permanence **Red flags that would warrant further investigation:** - Quadriceps weakness (femoral nerve injury) - Progressive symptoms (wound hematoma compressing nerve) - Severe pain refractory to medication (neuroma, nerve entrapment) The key is **expectant management with reassurance**, as most cases improve spontaneously. This complication should have been discussed during preoperative consent.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Diagnosis: Meralgia paresthetica from LFCN injury
Incidence 10-20% after anterior hip approach
LFCN is pure sensory (L2-L3) - no motor involvement
Distribution: anterolateral thigh numbness/dysesthesia
Natural history: Most recover over 6-12 months
Permanent in 5-10% but usually well-tolerated
Treatment: Reassurance, gabapentin if neuropathic pain
Distinguish from femoral nerve injury (would have quadriceps weakness)
Surgical exploration rarely indicated
Should have been consented preoperatively
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not recognizing LFCN injury as likely diagnosis
✗Confusing with femoral nerve injury
✗Offering surgical exploration prematurely
✗Not reassuring patient about likely recovery
✗Not checking for quadriceps weakness to rule out femoral nerve
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What would you do if there was also quadriceps weakness?"
"How would you have counseled this risk preoperatively?"
"When would you consider surgical exploration for LFCN injury?"

MCQ Practice Points

Internervous Plane Question

Q: What is the internervous plane in the Smith-Petersen anterior approach to the hip? A: Between tensor fasciae latae (supplied by superior gluteal nerve) and sartorius (supplied by femoral nerve). This is a true internervous plane with no motor nerve at risk within the interval.

Structure at Risk Question

Q: What is the most common nerve injury in anterior approach hip surgery and what are the symptoms? A: Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury occurs in 10-20% of cases. Symptoms are meralgia paresthetica: anterolateral thigh numbness and dysesthesia. This is a pure sensory nerve, so no motor weakness occurs.

Deep Anatomy Question

Q: What structure lies between the tensor fasciae latae and sartorius in the deep dissection and must be managed during exposure? A: Rectus femoris with its two heads (straight head from AIIS and reflected head from superior acetabular rim). The ascending branch of lateral circumflex femoral artery runs between rectus and TFL and must be ligated.

Indication Question

Q: What are the main indications for the Smith-Petersen anterior approach with iliofemoral extension? A: Acetabular fracture fixation (anterior column, both-column patterns), periacetabular osteotomy for DDH, and complex hip reconstruction. The extensile nature allows 360-degree acetabular visualization.

Complication Prevention Question

Q: How do you prevent femoral nerve injury during anterior approach hip surgery? A: The femoral nerve lies medial to the field deep to sartorius. Prevent injury by: (1) avoiding excessive medial retraction, (2) releasing self-retaining retractors periodically, (3) keeping dissection in the lateral interval, and (4) protecting during closure.

Australian Context

Local considerations:

  • Anterior approach THA (DAA) has variable adoption across Australia
  • Major arthroplasty centers often have surgeons trained in DAA
  • Learning curve considerations for emerging surgeons
  • AOANJRR tracks approach-specific outcomes

Medicolegal considerations:

  • Informed consent must specifically mention LFCN injury risk
  • Document discussion of meralgia paresthetica (10-20% incidence)
  • Mention possibility of wound extension or approach conversion for difficult femoral exposure
  • Standard precautions for DVT prophylaxis per ACSQHC guidelines

Equipment availability:

  • Specialized DAA tables available at major centers
  • Standard operating table adequate for Smith-Petersen for acetabular work
  • Familiarity with equipment before attempting approach

HIP ANTERIOR APPROACH (SMITH-PETERSEN)

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Anatomy

  • •Internervous plane: TFL (superior gluteal) vs sartorius (femoral)
  • •LFCN crosses field - 10-20% injury rate (meralgia paresthetica)
  • •Femoral nerve lies medial - protect from stretch injury
  • •Rectus femoris deep between TFL and sartorius
  • •Lateral circumflex femoral artery ascending branch - ligate early

Indications

  • •THA via DAA - muscle-sparing, faster recovery
  • •Acetabular fractures - anterior column, both-column with extension
  • •Pediatric hip - DDH, PAO, Pemberton osteotomy
  • •Extensile with iliofemoral extension for full acetabular access

Positioning and Setup

  • •Supine position - allows bilateral, easier anesthesia
  • •C-arm from contralateral side for imaging
  • •Incision: ASIS to greater trochanter region
  • •Mark femoral pulse - stay lateral to neurovascular bundle

Surgical Steps

  • •Step 1: Identify and protect LFCN in subcutaneous layer
  • •Step 2: Open fascia between TFL (lateral) and sartorius (medial)
  • •Step 3: Develop internervous plane bluntly
  • •Step 4: Identify rectus femoris deep in interval
  • •Step 5: Ligate ascending LCFA between rectus and TFL
  • •Step 6: Expose anterior hip capsule
  • •Step 7: Capsulotomy per indication (T-shaped for THA)

Complications

  • •LFCN injury: 10-20%, causes meralgia paresthetica
  • •Femoral nerve stretch: 1-3%, causes quadriceps weakness
  • •Proximal femoral fracture: 1-2% (THA), limited femoral visualization
  • •LCFA bleeding: Consistent if not ligated early
  • •Heterotopic ossification: 10-20% in trauma cases

Key Evidence

  • •Smith-Petersen 1917: Original description for hip arthrodesis
  • •True internervous plane: safe for extensive dissection
  • •DAA meta-analysis: Faster early recovery, no long-term difference
  • •LFCN injury: Consistent 10-20% across all studies
  • •Letournel: Gold standard for anterior acetabular access
Quick Stats
Complexityadvanced
Reading Time25 min
Updated2024-12-24
Related

Browse all procedures

View full catalog