Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision β€” with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

Β© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Hip Medial Approach (Ludloff)

Operative SurgeryArthroplasty
ArthroplastyAdvancedCore Procedure

Hip Medial Approach (Ludloff)

Comprehensive guide to the medial approach to the hip - Ludloff approach, adductor interval, obturator neurovascular structures, and applications in DDH and hip surgery for Orthopaedic exam

Procedure console
25 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Paediatric DDH open-reduction approach | No true internervous plane | Obturator nerve and MFCA at risk

1908First described by Ludloff
2 to 3 cmObturator nerve from the skin incision
DDHPrimary modern indication
~20%AVN after open reduction (medial = anterior)
Critical Must-Knows
  • The Ludloff medial approach is primarily a PAEDIATRIC approach for open reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH); it is rarely used in adult surgery and is never used for routine total hip arthroplasty.
  • There is NO true internervous plane β€” dissection passes through the adductor compartment, where all muscles are obturator-innervated; the interval used is between pectineus and adductor longus (or adductor longus and gracilis).
  • The obturator nerve lies about 2 to 3 cm from the skin incision β€” its anterior division runs between adductor longus and brevis, the posterior division between adductor brevis and magnus β€” and is at risk from traction.
  • The medial femoral circumflex artery (deep branch) is the primary blood supply to the femoral head and runs in the surgical field posterior to iliopsoas; injury causes avascular necrosis (AVN).
  • Exposure is limited β€” the acetabulum and femoral shaft cannot be well visualised β€” which is why the approach is unsuited to adult arthroplasty, acetabular fracture work, or revision surgery.

When & Why


What it exposes. The medial approach gives direct access to the medial hip capsule, the lesser trochanter and iliopsoas tendon, and the soft-tissue obstructions to reduction in DDH (pulvinar, ligamentum teres, transverse acetabular ligament). It is the classical exposure for open reduction of DDH in infants, and an occasional route for an open psoas release. Why medial β€” and why it is essentially paediatric. Karl Ludloff described the approach in 1908 for open reduction of congenital hip dislocation. It offers a cosmetic groin-crease incision, direct access to the medial capsule and the obstacles to reduction, and avoids disturbing the abductors or short external rotators. Its limitations are severe: the acetabulum cannot be visualised well enough to place an implant, the femoral shaft is unreachable, and the femoral head blood supply (the MFCA) lies in the field. For these reasons it has no role in primary or revision THA, acetabular fracture fixation, or femoral neck fracture fixation, and even in DDH its use is confined to the youngest infants. The adductor interval and the absence of an internervous plane. The approach works through the adductor compartment of the thigh. The superficial layer (anterior to posterior) is pectineus (femoral, or accessory obturator in about 10 percent), adductor longus (obturator, anterior division) and gracilis (obturator, anterior division); the deep layer is adductor brevis, adductor magnus (adductor part) and obturator externus. The interval used lies between pectineus (laterally) and adductor longus (medially), or between adductor longus (anterior) and gracilis (posterior). Because every muscle in this compartment is supplied by the obturator nerve, there is no true internervous plane β€” the approach succeeds by retracting muscle, not by exploiting a nerve boundary, in stark contrast to the posterior hip approach.

Posterior (Moore)
Plane
Gluteus maximus (inferior gluteal) vs gluteus medius (superior gluteal)
True internervous plane?
Yes β€” the only true one
Anterior (Smith-Petersen)
Plane
Sartorius (femoral) vs tensor fascia lata (superior gluteal)
True internervous plane?
Yes
Direct lateral (Hardinge)
Plane
Splits gluteus medius and minimus
True internervous plane?
No
Medial (Ludloff)
Plane
Through the adductor compartment (pectineus vs adductor longus)
True internervous plane?
No β€” all obturator innervated
Internervous planes of the hip approaches
ApproachPlaneTrue internervous plane?
Posterior (Moore)Gluteus maximus (inferior gluteal) vs gluteus medius (superior gluteal)Yes β€” the only true one
Anterior (Smith-Petersen)Sartorius (femoral) vs tensor fascia lata (superior gluteal)Yes
Direct lateral (Hardinge)Splits gluteus medius and minimusNo
Medial (Ludloff)Through the adductor compartment (pectineus vs adductor longus)No β€” all obturator innervated

When to choose it. Open reduction is reserved for hips that fail or are unsuitable for closed reduction; the medial option is mainly for the youngest infants.

DDH open reduction in an infant (6 to 18 months)
Medial approach?
Classical indication
Better alternative
Anterior (Smith-Petersen) if over 18 months or an osteotomy is needed
Primary or revision total hip arthroplasty
Medial approach?
Not indicated
Better alternative
Anterior, lateral or posterior
Psoas tendon release (snapping hip)
Medial approach?
Possible, rarely needed
Better alternative
Arthroscopic release preferred
Medial capsule pathology
Medial approach?
Niche use only
Better alternative
Usually a combined anterior approach
Acetabular or femoral-shaft work
Medial approach?
Not indicated
Better alternative
Anterior or lateral β€” the medial approach gives no view
When is the medial approach appropriate?
Clinical scenarioMedial approach?Better alternative
DDH open reduction in an infant (6 to 18 months)Classical indicationAnterior (Smith-Petersen) if over 18 months or an osteotomy is needed
Primary or revision total hip arthroplastyNot indicatedAnterior, lateral or posterior
Psoas tendon release (snapping hip)Possible, rarely neededArthroscopic release preferred
Medial capsule pathologyNiche use onlyUsually a combined anterior approach
Acetabular or femoral-shaft workNot indicatedAnterior or lateral β€” the medial approach gives no view

Age-based approach selection in DDH. - Under 6 months β€” closed management with a Pavlik harness.

  • 6 to 18 months β€” closed reduction or open reduction (medial or anterior).
  • 18 months to 3 years β€” open reduction plus pelvic osteotomy, usually through an anterior approach.
  • Over 3 years β€” anterior approach preferred, with pelvic osteotomy. Severity is graded with the TΓΆnnis classification, which informs whether open reduction (and which approach) is needed.
Grade I
Femoral head position
Subluxation; head under 75 percent coverage
Typical management
Closed reduction usually successful
Grade II
Femoral head position
Head lateralised but below the acetabulum
Typical management
Closed reduction usually successful
Grade III
Femoral head position
Head at the level of the acetabulum
Typical management
Open reduction may be needed β€” medial approach an option
Grade IV
Femoral head position
Head above the acetabulum (high dislocation)
Typical management
Open reduction plus osteotomy β€” anterior preferred
TΓΆnnis classification of DDH (displacement)
GradeFemoral head positionTypical management
Grade ISubluxation; head under 75 percent coverageClosed reduction usually successful
Grade IIHead lateralised but below the acetabulumClosed reduction usually successful
Grade IIIHead at the level of the acetabulumOpen reduction may be needed β€” medial approach an option
Grade IVHead above the acetabulum (high dislocation)Open reduction plus osteotomy β€” anterior preferred

Position and landmarks. The patient is supine on a radiolucent table with the affected hip flexed about 45 degrees, externally rotated about 45 degrees and abducted to relax the adductors and open the interval; the knee is flexed 45 to 90 degrees. A frog-leg (figure-of-4) position is often used in infants. The contralateral leg is secured out of the way. The incision is centred over the adductor longus origin in the groin crease, about 2 to 3 cm medial to the femoral pulse. Drape circumferentially, exposing the medial thigh from groin crease to mid-thigh, and protect and isolate the genitalia. Fluoroscopy and an intra-operative arthrogram are used to confirm reduction.

The Exposure


Work from skin down to the medial capsule through the adductor interval, protecting the obturator nerve and the medial femoral circumflex artery at every layer, then release the obstacles to reduction.

Medial (Ludloff) hip approach
Medial (Ludloff) approach to the hip, used for open reduction in developmental dysplasia.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Medial (Ludloff) approach β€” step by step

Step 1Incision in the groin crease
  • A transverse incision in the proximal medial groin crease, 4 to 5 cm long, centred over the adductor longus origin and about 2 to 3 cm medial to the femoral pulse.
  • A longitudinal incision along adductor longus is an alternative and gives easier proximal-to-distal extension.
  • Achieve haemostasis of superficial vessels (external pudendal) with diathermy.
Step 2Find adductor longus and open the fascia
  • Incise the deep fascia over the adductor compartment and identify the adductor longus tendon β€” the most anterior adductor and the guide to the interval.
  • Retract adductor longus medially.
Step 3Develop the interval
  • Work the interval between pectineus (laterally) and adductor longus (medially); the alternative is between adductor longus (anterior) and gracilis (posterior).
  • This is NOT a true internervous plane β€” all these muscles share obturator innervation, so the approach proceeds by retraction rather than nerve-sparing dissection.
Step 4Deep dissection β€” protect the obturator nerve
  • Retract pectineus laterally with great care β€” the femoral vessels lie immediately lateral to it in the femoral triangle, so stay on the medial side of pectineus and avoid any dissection lateral to it.
  • Identify adductor brevis deep to longus, and protect the obturator nerve running on the surface of adductor brevis (anterior division between longus and brevis; posterior division between brevis and magnus).
Step 5Identify the lesser trochanter and iliopsoas
  • Palpate the lesser trochanter β€” the insertion of iliopsoas.
  • For DDH reduction, the psoas tendon is usually released at the lesser trochanter to relieve a major obstacle to reduction.
Step 6Expose the medial capsule
  • Dissect carefully down to the hip capsule; the medial capsule is thin and lies closely applied to psoas.
  • The medial femoral circumflex artery runs posterior to iliopsoas in this region β€” meticulous haemostasis and avoidance of posterior dissection are essential to protect the femoral head blood supply.
Step 7Capsulotomy and reduction
  • Make a longitudinal or T-shaped capsulotomy.
  • Remove the obstacles to reduction β€” pulvinar (fibrofatty tissue), a hypertrophied ligamentum teres, and release the transverse acetabular ligament if it is tight.
  • Gently reduce the femoral head with traction and abduction, confirm reduction with an arthrogram, and test stability through flexion and extension.
Step 8Closure and immobilisation
  • The capsule may be closed loosely or left open; allow the muscles to fall back into anatomical position and close the skin with absorbable sutures.
  • Immobilise in a hip spica in the human position β€” flexion 90 to 100 degrees, abduction 40 to 50 degrees, neutral rotation.
Two structures dominate the danger of this approach

The medial femoral circumflex artery (deep branch) is the primary blood supply to the femoral head; it runs posterior to iliopsoas and around the femoral neck, and injury causes avascular necrosis β€” be meticulous near the lesser trochanter and capsule and avoid posterior dissection. The obturator nerve lies about 2 to 3 cm deep; its anterior division runs between adductor longus and brevis and its posterior division between brevis and magnus, and excessive retraction causes a traction neuropraxia. Identify and protect both throughout.

Stay medial to pectineus, and identify the nerve early

The femoral neurovascular bundle sits just lateral to pectineus β€” never dissect lateral to that muscle. Identify the adductor longus tendon first (the most anterior adductor), develop the interval medially, and find the obturator nerve on the surface of adductor brevis before any deep retraction. An arthrogram confirms reduction and is essential in DDH cases.

Dangers & Extensions


Structures at risk, by layer. The danger of this approach is concentrated in two structures β€” the obturator nerve and the medial femoral circumflex artery β€” with the femoral bundle at risk if dissection strays lateral to pectineus.

Obturator nerve (L2 to L4)
Location and risk
Between the adductors, about 2 to 3 cm deep; traction neuropraxia
Prevention
Identify early on adductor brevis, protect branches, avoid forceful retraction
If injured
Document the deficit; observe if neuropraxia; explore and repair if transected
Medial femoral circumflex artery (deep branch)
Location and risk
Posterior to iliopsoas, around the femoral neck; primary femoral head supply
Prevention
Meticulous deep dissection away from the posterosuperior neck; avoid posterior dissection
If injured
Ligate if bleeding; monitor for AVN post-operatively
Femoral vessels
Location and risk
Lateral to pectineus, in the femoral triangle
Prevention
Stay medial to pectineus; palpate the femoral pulse
If injured
Direct compression; vascular surgery consultation
Profunda femoris artery
Location and risk
Deep in the thigh; gives origin to the MFCA
Prevention
Stay superficial to this level; careful haemostasis
If injured
Ligate branches as needed
Neurovascular structures at risk
StructureLocation and riskPreventionIf injured
Obturator nerve (L2 to L4)Between the adductors, about 2 to 3 cm deep; traction neuropraxiaIdentify early on adductor brevis, protect branches, avoid forceful retractionDocument the deficit; observe if neuropraxia; explore and repair if transected
Medial femoral circumflex artery (deep branch)Posterior to iliopsoas, around the femoral neck; primary femoral head supplyMeticulous deep dissection away from the posterosuperior neck; avoid posterior dissectionLigate if bleeding; monitor for AVN post-operatively
Femoral vesselsLateral to pectineus, in the femoral triangleStay medial to pectineus; palpate the femoral pulseDirect compression; vascular surgery consultation
Profunda femoris arteryDeep in the thigh; gives origin to the MFCAStay superficial to this level; careful haemostasisLigate branches as needed

Avascular necrosis of the femoral head. AVN is the most feared complication. The pooled rate after open reduction is approximately 18 to 20 percent, and it does not differ significantly between the medial and anterior approaches (meta-analysis 18.7 percent medial vs 19.6 percent anterior). Individual series range widely, from 5 to 43 percent. Mechanism is injury to the deep branch of the MFCA or pressure on the femoral head from over-reduction or wide-abduction casting. Risk factors include a more severe or higher dislocation, an absent ossific nucleus, and immobilisation in excessive abduction (60 degrees or more); pooled data did not confirm age over 12 months as an independent risk factor. Prevention rests on meticulous deep dissection away from the posterosuperior neck, gentle reduction, and avoidance of extreme abduction in the spica. AVN is graded with the Kalamchi and MacEwen classification.

Grade I
Severity
Mild β€” no or minimal change
Grade II to III
Severity
Moderate
Grade IV
Severity
Severe head collapse
Kalamchi and MacEwen β€” avascular necrosis grading
GradeSeverity
Grade IMild β€” no or minimal change
Grade II to IIIModerate
Grade IVSevere head collapse
AVN is the most feared complication of DDH open reduction

The medial femoral circumflex artery supplies most of the femoral head and runs in the surgical field. Even with perfect technique, AVN can occur from pressure effects of reduction itself. Always counsel families about this risk, avoid excessive abduction in the spica, and follow the hip radiographically to skeletal maturity.

Obturator nerve palsy. Rare (under 2 percent) with careful technique. It presents as weakness of hip adduction with sensory loss over the medial thigh β€” anterior division injury affects adductor longus, brevis and gracilis, posterior division injury affects adductor magnus and obturator externus. Most cases are a neuropraxia from retraction and recover over weeks to months; EMG at 3 to 4 weeks classifies the injury, and exploration is considered if there is no recovery by 3 to 6 months. Redislocation or subluxation (DDH). Reported in 5 to 10 percent of series, from inadequate reduction, instability, or non-compliance with immobilisation. Prevention is confirmation of reduction with arthrography and adequate immobilisation; management is repeat closed or open reduction, with consideration of a pelvic osteotomy. Residual acetabular dysplasia β€” not AVN β€” is the main driver of long-term failure and may require later osteotomy. Radiographic outcome is graded with the Severin classification, assessed at skeletal maturity (grades I to II are satisfactory).

I
Finding
Normal
II
Finding
Mild deformity, normal head-to-acetabulum relationship
III
Finding
Dysplasia without subluxation
IV to VI
Finding
Progressive subluxation to dislocation
Severin classification β€” radiographic outcome
GradeFinding
INormal
IIMild deformity, normal head-to-acetabulum relationship
IIIDysplasia without subluxation
IV to VIProgressive subluxation to dislocation

Variants of the medial approach.

Ludloff (classic)
Key features
Through the adductor interval; pectineus retracted laterally
Primary use
DDH open reduction
Ferguson
Key features
Dissection medial to adductor longus; slightly more distal
Primary use
Modified DDH reduction
Weinstein
Key features
Modified Ludloff with an extended capsulotomy
Primary use
DDH in older infants
Anteromedial
Key features
Combined anterior and medial elements
Primary use
Extended exposure
Variants of the medial approach
VariantKey featuresPrimary use
Ludloff (classic)Through the adductor interval; pectineus retracted laterallyDDH open reduction
FergusonDissection medial to adductor longus; slightly more distalModified DDH reduction
WeinsteinModified Ludloff with an extended capsulotomyDDH in older infants
AnteromedialCombined anterior and medial elementsExtended exposure

Extensile options and closure. Extension is limited β€” the incision can be carried proximally along adductor longus for a little more proximal exposure, but the approach cannot be usefully extended to the acetabulum or femoral shaft. Closure returns the muscles to their anatomical position; the capsule may be closed loosely or left open. A hip spica is applied in the human position for 6 to 12 weeks, with post-reduction imaging to confirm reduction and serial radiographs to skeletal maturity to monitor for residual dysplasia and AVN.

Procedures Through This Approach


  • Developmental dysplasia of the hip β€” open reduction in infants is the principal operation done through this exposure.
  • Psoas (iliopsoas) tendon release at the lesser trochanter β€” now mostly performed arthroscopically, but accessible here.
  • Access to the medial hip capsule for rare niche pathology.
  • Not suitable for primary or revision total hip arthroplasty, acetabular fracture fixation, femoral neck fixation, or femoral osteotomy β€” inadequate exposure and MFCA risk.

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

MEDIALMEDIAL β€” structures at risk in the medial approach

M
Medial circumflex artery
Deep branch β€” primary femoral head blood supply; injury causes AVN
E
External pudendal vessels
Superficial vessels in the groin, divided at the incision
D
Deep femoral artery (profunda)
Origin of the circumflex vessels, deep in the thigh
I
Iliopsoas (released)
Psoas tendon divided at the lesser trochanter to aid reduction
A
Adductor muscles (retracted)
No true internervous plane β€” all obturator innervated
L
Lateral circumflex (less at risk)
Lies more anterior than the medial circumflex

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œDescribe the medial approach to the hip. What is the internervous plane and what are the main structures at risk?”

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

β€œA 10-month-old infant has failed closed reduction for DDH and open reduction is planned. What approach options exist, and what is the role of the medial approach?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

β€œAfter a medial approach to the hip the patient has weakness of hip adduction. How do you assess and manage this?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Medial approach to the hip β€” exam-day essentials

Key anatomy

  • NO true internervous plane β€” all adductors are obturator-innervated
  • Interval: pectineus (lateral) and adductor longus (medial)
  • Obturator nerve: 2 to 3 cm from the incision, between the adductor muscles
  • MFCA: posterior to iliopsoas, supplies the femoral head
  • Patient supine, hip flexed and externally rotated

Indications and contraindications

  • Primary indication: DDH open reduction (paediatric)
  • Rare: psoas release, medial capsule access
  • NOT for THA β€” poor exposure, MFCA risk
  • NOT for revision surgery or acetabular fracture

Structures at risk

  • Obturator nerve β€” hip adduction weakness
  • MFCA (deep branch) β€” femoral head AVN
  • Femoral vessels β€” if dissection extends lateral to pectineus
  • Profunda femoris β€” origin of the MFCA

Comparison with other approaches

  • Posterior: TRUE internervous plane (the only one)
  • Anterior (Smith-Petersen): sartorius / TFL β€” safe plane
  • Direct lateral (Hardinge): FALSE β€” splits gluteus medius
  • Medial (Ludloff): FALSE β€” all obturator innervated

Complications

  • AVN of the femoral head: about 18 to 20 percent pooled (medial = anterior)
  • Obturator nerve palsy: hip adduction weakness
  • Redislocation: 5 to 10 percent if reduction or immobilisation is inadequate
  • Residual dysplasia: the main driver of long-term failure β€” may need later osteotomy

Exam key points

  • Low yield for adult reconstruction β€” know it exists
  • Primarily a paediatric DDH approach
  • No internervous plane (contrast with the posterior approach)
  • MFCA and obturator nerve are at risk
  • Not used for THA β€” focus preparation on other approaches

References


Guidelines, registries and global practice. The medial (Ludloff) approach is a paediatric open-reduction technique. Across major societies, open reduction is reserved for hips that fail or are unsuitable for closed reduction, but the threshold for choosing the medial over the anterior approach varies by surgeon and region. - AAOS (US) clinical practice guideline β€” open reduction for hips failing or unsuitable for closed reduction; medial vs anterior left to surgeon judgement.

  • BSCOS / BOA (UK) β€” some units favour the medial approach in the youngest infants (typically under 12 months) where capsulorrhaphy or a concurrent osteotomy is not needed.
  • EPOS / European paediatric practice β€” anterior (Smith-Petersen) preferred once a pelvic osteotomy is anticipated or before the ossific nucleus has appeared.
  • Resource-variable settings β€” late-presenting, higher-grade dislocations are more common, pushing practice toward the anterior approach with concomitant bony procedures. Evidence convergence. Across pooled series the AVN rate after medial open reduction is broadly comparable to the anterior approach (meta-analysis 18.7 percent medial vs 19.6 percent anterior; no significant difference). Long-term failure after the medial approach is driven mainly by residual acetabular dysplasia, not AVN β€” about one in five hips needs further surgery in long-follow-up cohorts. Earlier reduction (6 months or younger) is associated with very low rates of later bony surgery without an excess of severe AVN.
Orthopaedic exam priority

If asked broadly about hip approaches, lead with those used in routine adult practice (anterior, lateral, posterior). If asked specifically about the medial approach, show you know it exists, its primary use (paediatric DDH open reduction), its lack of a true internervous plane, and why it is not used for adult THA (limited exposure, MFCA risk).

Evidence

Long-term Outcomes of the Medial (Ludloff) Approach for Open Reduction in DDH

LoE 3
Pollet V, Van Dijk L, Reijman M, Castelein RMC, Sakkers RJB β€’ Bone Joint J (2018)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective cohort of 52 children (58 hips), all dislocated and under 1 year at surgery, mean follow-up 12.7 years
  • AVN present in 11 hips (19%) at latest follow-up
  • Further surgery required in 13 hips (22%); 13 hips had poor radiographic outcome (Severin III or higher)
  • Poor outcome was driven by residual dysplasia, NOT by AVN; older age at surgery predicted worse Severin grade
  • Approximately one in five children had a poor clinical and/or radiological result
Clinical implication: The medial approach gives durable reduction in selected infant hips, but residual acetabular dysplasia (not AVN) is the main cause of long-term failure β€” mandating serial radiographic surveillance to skeletal maturity.
Limitation: Single-centre retrospective cohort with no concurrent anterior-approach comparison group.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 29855247)
Evidence

Early Medial-Approach Open Reduction in Infants 6 Months or Younger

LoE 3
Yassin M, Daoub A, Carsi B β€’ J Clin Orthop Trauma (2024)
Key Findings:
  • Single-centre retrospective series of 48 hips (44 infants), mean age at surgery 4 months, mean follow-up 9.8 years
  • Clinically significant AVN (Kalamchi-MacEwen 2 to 4) in 9 of 48 hips (19%), all type 2 (mild)
  • Only 1 of 48 hips (2%) needed a later pelvic osteotomy for residual dysplasia
  • Severin I or II (satisfactory) achieved in 81% at final follow-up
  • No statistically significant predictor of AVN identified, including age and ossific nucleus status
Clinical implication: Performing medial open reduction early (6 months or younger) maximises acetabular remodelling and minimises later bony procedures, without an unacceptable rate or severity of AVN.
Limitation: Retrospective, single-centre, no randomisation or comparator approach.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 38708090)
Evidence

Age and Surgical Approach vs Osteonecrosis in DDH: Meta-analysis

LoE 3
Novais EN, Hill MK, Carry PM, Heyn PC β€’ Clin Orthop Relat Res (2016)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of 66 studies; meta-analysis of 24 (584 hips open-reduced)
  • Open reduction after vs at-or-before 12 months: no difference in osteonecrosis (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.9)
  • Medial vs anterior open reduction: no difference in osteonecrosis (18.7% medial vs 19.6% anterior; OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.5 to 2.2)
  • Pooled osteonecrosis (grade II or higher) after open reduction approximately 18 to 20%
  • Delaying surgery past 1 year to avoid osteonecrosis was NOT supported
Clinical implication: Choice between medial and anterior open reduction can be made on surgeon preference and exposure needs β€” approach itself does not change osteonecrosis risk, and reduction should not be delayed to reduce that risk.
Limitation: Pooled data dominated by Level III to IV non-randomised observational studies of inconsistent quality.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 26472583)
Evidence

Long-term Outcomes of the Medial Approach: Systematic Review

LoE 3
Akilapa O β€’ J Child Orthop (2014)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of 5 retrospective studies reporting long-term outcomes of medial-approach open reduction
  • Mean age at surgery 10 to 17 months; mean follow-up 16 to 25 years
  • Satisfactory acetabular outcome (Severin I or II) in 38 to 79% of hips
  • AVN (mostly Kalamchi criteria) ranged widely from 5 to 43%
  • Secondary operations in 11 to 50% of hips; absent ossific nucleus and age over 17 months were poor prognostic factors
Clinical implication: Reported medial-approach results vary widely and long-term outcomes are less favourable than short-term series suggest β€” counsel families realistically and follow to maturity.
Limitation: Only five heterogeneous retrospective observational studies met inclusion; no high-level evidence available.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 25270942)
Evidence

Anatomy of the Medial Femoral Circumflex Artery and its Surgical Implications

LoE 4
Gautier E, Ganz K, Krugel N, Gill T, Ganz R β€’ J Bone Joint Surg Br (2000)
Key Findings:
  • Cadaveric injection study of 24 hips defining the course of the medial femoral circumflex artery (MFCA)
  • The deep branch of the MFCA is the primary source of blood supply to the femoral head
  • Extracapsular course is constant: the deep branch crosses posterior to the obturator externus tendon then anterior to the conjoint tendon before piercing the capsule
  • An intact obturator externus protects the deep branch during dislocation in any direction
  • Dividing the short external rotators or aggressive deep medial dissection can disrupt the deep branch and cause iatrogenic AVN
Clinical implication: The deep branch of the MFCA, running on the posterosuperior femoral neck and shielded by obturator externus, is the structure that must be preserved to avoid femoral head osteonecrosis in any hip approach.
Limitation: Cadaveric anatomical study; perfusion dynamics in the living infant hip may differ.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 10963165)
Editorially reviewed β€” transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
25 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed Β· 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
25 min
Updated
2026-06-20
Browse all procedures