Hip Posterior Approach (Moore/Southern)
Comprehensive guide to the posterior (Moore/Southern) approach to the hip - true internervous plane, piriformis preservation, capsular repair, and dislocation prevention for Orthopaedic exam
Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team
Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team
POSTERIOR APPROACH TO HIP (MOORE/SOUTHERN)
True Internervous Plane | Sciatic Nerve at Risk | Capsular Repair Reduces Dislocation
Critical Posterior Approach Exam Points
True Internervous Plane
Only hip approach with true internervous plane: gluteus maximus (inferior gluteal nerve) and gluteus medius (superior gluteal nerve). No muscle denervation occurs with proper technique.
Sciatic Nerve Danger
The sciatic nerve runs 1cm medial to the greater trochanter and posterior to the acetabulum. At highest risk during: posterior retractor placement, acetabular exposure, and leg lengthening. Injury causes foot drop and severe disability.
Capsular Repair Essential
Capsular repair with or without short external repair reduces dislocation from 7% to 2-3%. This is now standard of care. Use non-absorbable suture to reattach capsule and piriformis to femur.
Dislocation Risk Factors
Post-op dislocation occurs with combined flexion, adduction, internal rotation. Highest risk: getting out of low chair, tying shoes, picking up objects. Patient education is critical for first 6-12 weeks.
Quick Decision Guide - Posterior vs Other Approaches
POSTERIORPOSTERIOR - Surgical Steps
Memory Hook:POSTERIOR approach - remember to REPAIR the capsule to prevent dislocation!
SCIATICSCIATIC - Nerve Protection
Memory Hook:Protect the SCIATIC nerve - it's the most important structure at risk!
FLAIRFLAIR - Dislocation Mechanism
Memory Hook:FLAIR position = Flexion + Adduction + Internal Rotation - the danger zone after posterior THA!
Overview and Background
The posterior (Moore/Southern) approach to the hip is a workhorse surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty, hip fracture surgery, and revision procedures. First described by Austin Moore in 1957 and modified by Southern in 1980, it remains one of the most commonly used approaches worldwide.
Historical Context:
- 1957: Austin Moore - original posterior approach with piriformis division
- 1980: Southern modification - piriformis preservation technique
- 1990s-2000s: Recognition of capsular repair importance for dislocation prevention
- 2010s-present: Enhanced recovery protocols with routine capsular repair
Australian Epidemiology (AOANJRR 2023):
- Posterior approach used in 35% of primary THAs in Australia
- Second most common approach (lateral 40%, anterior 20%)
- No difference in long-term revision rates between approaches
- Dislocation rates declining with routine capsular repair protocols
Key Advantages:
- True internervous plane - the only hip approach with no muscle denervation risk
- Excellent acetabular exposure (especially posterior wall)
- Extensile - can extend proximally or distally without neurovascular risk
- Familiar to most orthopaedic surgeons worldwide
Key Disadvantages:
- Higher native dislocation rate (5-7%) if capsule not repaired
- Sciatic nerve at risk (0.5-2% transient injury)
- Posterior soft tissue disruption
- Post-operative position restrictions (flexion + adduction + internal rotation)
Anatomy and Biomechanics
The True Internervous Plane
The posterior approach exploits the only true internervous plane to the hip joint:
- Gluteus maximus (supplied by inferior gluteal nerve L5-S2)
- Gluteus medius (supplied by superior gluteal nerve L4-S1)
No muscle denervation occurs when the approach is performed correctly, as both muscles remain fully innervated.
Short External Rotators (Superficial to Deep)
- Piriformis - Key landmark; sciatic nerve runs below this muscle
- Superior gemellus
- Obturator internus tendon
- Inferior gemellus
- Quadratus femoris - Most inferior; sciatic nerve lies on its anterior surface
Sciatic Nerve Anatomy
The sciatic nerve is the primary structure at risk:
- Exits pelvis through greater sciatic foramen (below piriformis in 85%)
- Runs 1cm medial to greater trochanter
- Lies posterior to acetabular posterior column
- Contains both common peroneal (lateral) and tibial (medial) divisions
- Most at risk during: posterior retractor placement, acetabular reaming, leg lengthening
Posterior Capsule and Stability
The posterior capsule is the primary restraint to posterior dislocation:
- Thickest at the posterior-superior quadrant
- Iliofemoral ligament provides anterior restraint (not at risk posteriorly)
- Capsular repair restores 60-70% of native posterior stability
- Short external rotator repair adds additional posterior restraint
Internervous Plane
The True Internervous Plane of the Posterior Approach
The posterior approach to the hip is the only hip approach with a true internervous plane. This fundamental anatomical advantage distinguishes it from all other hip approaches.
Superficial Internervous Plane:
- Laterally: Gluteus maximus (inferior gluteal nerve, L5-S2)
- Medially: Gluteus medius (superior gluteal nerve, L4-S1)
These muscles are separated without denervating either. Gluteus maximus is split in the line of its fibers (not across), preserving its innervation.
Deep Internervous Plane: There is no true deep internervous plane. The short external rotators share innervation from sacral plexus branches:
- Piriformis: S1-S2
- Gemelli and obturator internus: L5-S1
- Quadratus femoris: L4-S1
These muscles are divided (Moore) or partially divided (Southern), not split along an internervous plane.
Clinical Significance:
- No abductor denervation (unlike lateral approaches)
- Gluteus maximus function preserved
- Lower risk of Trendelenburg gait than lateral approaches
- Main limitation: posterior instability from capsular disruption (addressed by repair)
Examination Pearl: When asked "What is the internervous plane of the posterior approach?" the answer is: "Gluteus maximus (inferior gluteal nerve) and gluteus medius (superior gluteal nerve). This is the ONLY true internervous plane to the hip."
Positioning and Patient Setup
Lateral Decubitus Position for Posterior Approach
Standard Position: The patient is placed in lateral decubitus with the operative hip uppermost.
Key Positioning Elements:
-
Pelvis Perpendicular to Floor
- Most critical positioning factor
- Use pelvic positioner or sandbags anteriorly and posteriorly
- Check with C-arm: obturator foramina symmetric, coccyx midline
- Any pelvic tilt causes equivalent error in cup anteversion
-
Lower Leg Positioning
- Knee flexed 90 degrees for comfort
- Padded between legs (axillary roll and knee)
- Secured to table
-
Operative Leg Free
- Must move through full range during surgery
- Needs to achieve flexion, adduction, and internal rotation for dislocation
- Needs to be positioned for trial reduction and stability testing
-
C-arm Access
- Position allows true AP and lateral fluoroscopy
- Verify landmarks before draping
Common Positioning Errors:
| Error | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Pelvis tilted forward | Cup appears more anteverted than actual (false security) |
| Pelvis tilted backward | Cup appears more retroverted than actual (may overcorrect) |
| Patient rolling backward | Makes posterior exposure easier but causes anteversion error |
| Inadequate padding | Pressure injuries, nerve compression |
Examination Tip: Always mention pelvic position when describing the posterior approach. Examiners expect you to recognize that pelvic tilt is the most common cause of cup malposition.
Pathophysiology
Biomechanical Rationale for Posterior Approach
Native Hip Stability Mechanism: The hip joint relies on several stabilizers that must be understood when selecting and performing surgical approaches:
- Bony containment: Deep acetabulum with 170° arc of coverage
- Labrum: Increases acetabular depth by 21%, adds suction seal
- Capsule: Posterior capsule is thickest and most critical for stability after posterior approach
- Ligamentum teres: Minor stabilizer, typically sacrificed in arthroplasty
- Muscular stabilizers: Short external rotators provide dynamic posterior stability
Pathophysiology of Posterior Dislocation: After posterior approach THA, instability occurs through a specific mechanism:
- Combined motion vector: Flexion + adduction + internal rotation brings femoral head toward posterior-inferior capsular defect
- Critical angle: Risk increases dramatically when hip flexed beyond 90° with adduction and IR
- Capsular deficiency: Untreated posterior capsulotomy creates path of least resistance
- Loss of short external rotators: These muscles provide dynamic posterior restraint when intact
Why Capsular Repair Works: The posterior capsule contributes approximately 60-70% of posterior hip stability. Repair addresses:
- Recreates mechanical barrier to posterior translation
- Restores proprioceptive feedback from capsular receptors
- Allows early mobilization without strict hip precautions
- Reduces dislocation rate from 5-7% to 2-3%
Sciatic Nerve Vulnerability: The sciatic nerve is at risk due to its anatomical course:
- Exits pelvis through greater sciatic foramen below piriformis
- Runs 1cm medial to greater trochanter tip
- Courses posterior to short external rotators and posterior capsule
- Vulnerable to direct injury, retractor compression, and leg lengthening stretch
Classification Systems
Moore vs Southern Approach Variants
| Feature | Moore Approach | Southern Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Piriformis | Divided | Preserved |
| Short externals | All divided | Gemelli + obturator only |
| Exposure | Slightly better | Slightly less |
| Theoretical stability | Less (piriformis divided) | More (piriformis intact) |
| Evidence | Extensive | Limited |
| Current practice | Common | Less common |
Current consensus: Capsular repair is more important than piriformis preservation for preventing dislocation. Either approach acceptable if capsule repaired.
Clinical Assessment
Pre-operative Assessment
History:
- Primary complaint: Hip pain (groin, lateral, posterior), stiffness, limp
- Duration and progression of symptoms
- Previous hip surgery or injections
- Dislocation risk factors: Age over 70, female, neurological disorder, cognitive impairment, prior hip surgery
- Medical comorbidities affecting anesthesia and rehabilitation
Physical Examination:
- Gait: Antalgic, Trendelenburg (abductor weakness)
- Range of motion: Flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal and external rotation
- Limb length: Measure from ASIS to medial malleolus
- Neurovascular status: Document pre-operative nerve function (especially if revision)
- Skin quality: Previous incisions, skin condition
Pre-operative Nerve Documentation: Critical for posterior approach given sciatic nerve risk:
- Ankle dorsiflexion (L4-L5, deep peroneal)
- Great toe extension (L5)
- Ankle plantarflexion (S1-S2, tibial)
- Sensation in sciatic distribution
Pre-op Documentation
Always document pre-operative nerve function before posterior approach THA. If patient has pre-existing foot drop or numbness, this must be noted. Post-operative neuropraxia rate is 0.5-2% even with perfect technique - defending against medicolegal claims requires thorough pre-operative documentation.
Investigations
Pre-operative Imaging
Radiographs (mandatory):
- AP pelvis: Assess acetabular morphology, femoral offset, leg length, osteophytes
- Lateral hip: Femoral version, anterior osteophytes, femoral bow
- Templating: Pre-operative planning for implant size and positioning
CT Scan (selective indications):
- Significant bony deformity (DDH, previous trauma)
- Revision surgery - assess bone stock
- Complex acetabular morphology
- 3D assessment of version and bone loss
Pre-operative Templating
| Parameter | Measurement | Goal |
|---|---|---|
| Cup size | Acetabular diameter | 2mm larger than native |
| Cup position | Inclination/anteversion | 40° / 15-20° |
| Stem size | Femoral canal diameter | Fill canal metaphyseally |
| Femoral offset | Contralateral comparison | Restore to native |
| Leg length | Contralateral comparison | Equal or slightly longer (under 10mm) |
| Neck osteotomy | Lesser trochanter reference | Match template level |
Laboratory Investigations
Standard pre-operative workup:
- FBC, U&E, coagulation studies
- Group and hold (or crossmatch for revision)
- ECG (if indicated by age/comorbidity)
- Infection markers if concern (ESR, CRP, joint aspiration if indicated)
Management Algorithm
Posterior dislocation:
- Incidence: 2-3% (with repair), 5-7% (without repair)
- Direction: Posterior (flexion + adduction + internal rotation)
- Timing: 80% in first 3 months, risk persists lifelong
- Prevention: Capsular repair, patient education, avoid risk positions
- Treatment: Closed reduction (first time), revision surgery if recurrent (2+ dislocations)
Sciatic nerve palsy:
- Incidence: 0.5-2% (transient), 0.1-0.5% (permanent)
- Presentation: Foot drop (common peroneal division), numbness lateral leg
- Risk factors: Revision surgery, DDH, excessive lengthening (over 4cm), direct trauma
- Recovery: 60% recover by 1 year if neuropraxia, poor if neurotmesis
- Management: Ankle-foot orthosis (AFO), physiotherapy, nerve exploration if progressive
Heterotopic ossification:
- Incidence: 20-40% (radiographic), 5-10% (symptomatic)
- Risk factors: Male gender, DISH, hypertrophic osteoarthritis, previous HO
- Prevention: Indomethacin 25mg TDS × 6 weeks OR single-dose radiation (7 Gy)
- Treatment: Excision if symptomatic after maturation (12+ months)
Dislocation Risk Position
The risk position after posterior approach THA is: Flexion beyond 90° + Adduction + Internal Rotation. Common scenarios: getting out of low chair, tying shoes, picking object off floor, sitting on toilet. Patient education to avoid this position for 6-12 weeks is critical.
Postoperative Care
Immediate Post-operative Period (Day 0-2)
Day of Surgery:
- Weight bearing as tolerated with walking frame
- DVT prophylaxis: Rivaroxaban 10mg daily × 5 weeks OR enoxaparin OR aspirin
- Pain management: Multimodal (paracetamol + NSAID + opioid PRN)
- Ice to surgical site
Mobilization Protocol:
| With Capsular Repair (Modern) | Without Capsular Repair (Historical) |
|---|---|
| No hip precautions | Strict hip precautions |
| Sit on normal chair | Raised toilet seat, cushion |
| Bend to floor if able | Avoid flexion over 90° |
| Cross legs if comfortable | No leg crossing |
| Enhanced recovery | Traditional pathway |
DVT Prophylaxis (Australian Guidelines):
- Chemical: Rivaroxaban 10mg daily × 35 days OR Enoxaparin 40mg daily OR Aspirin 100-150mg daily
- Mechanical: TED stockings, intermittent calf compression intra-operatively
- Early mobilization: Most important factor
Week 1-6
- Progressive gait training: Frame → crutches → single stick → unaided
- Hip strengthening exercises (abductors, flexors, extensors)
- Range of motion exercises (within precautions if applicable)
- Wound review at 2 weeks
- Follow-up radiographs
Week 6-12
- Increase activity level
- Driving typically allowed at 6 weeks
- Return to low-impact activities (swimming, cycling, golf)
- If capsule repaired: No restrictions
- If capsule not repaired: Continue precautions until 12 weeks
Outcomes and Prognosis
*/}
Short-term Outcomes (under 2 years)
Dislocation:
- With capsular repair: 2-3%
- Without capsular repair: 5-7%
- 80% occur in first 3 months
- Most can be managed with closed reduction
Functional Recovery:
- 90% satisfied with pain relief by 3 months
- Full recovery of function: 6-12 months
- Return to driving: 4-6 weeks
- Return to golf/swimming: 3-6 months
Long-term Outcomes (AOANJRR Data)
Revision Rates:
- 5-year revision rate: 5% (similar across approaches)
- 10-year revision rate: 7-8%
- 15-year revision rate: 10-12%
- No difference between posterior, lateral, or anterior approaches
Causes of Revision:
| Cause | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Loosening | 25% |
| Infection | 20% |
| Dislocation/instability | 18% |
| Fracture | 12% |
| Other | 25% |
Prognostic Factors
Good Prognosis:
- Primary OA indication
- Age 60-80
- BMI under 30
- No cognitive impairment
- Good soft tissue quality
- Experienced surgeon with capsular repair
Poorer Prognosis:
- Revision surgery
- Neuromuscular disorder
- Cognitive impairment
- Age over 80 or under 50
- BMI over 35
- AVN or DDH
Evidence Base and Key Studies
Capsular Repair Reduces Dislocation - Systematic Review
AOANJRR Data - Approach Utilization Australia
Enhanced Recovery and Capsular Repair
Sciatic Nerve Injury in Primary THA: Risk Factors and Outcomes
Short External Rotator Repair Technique and Outcomes
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
Scenario 1: Describe Posterior Approach
"Walk me through the posterior approach to the hip for THA. What is the internervous plane and what structures are at risk?"
Scenario 2: Post-operative Sciatic Nerve Palsy
"A 72-year-old woman undergoes primary THA via posterior approach. In recovery, she has complete foot drop and numbness over the lateral leg and dorsum of foot. How do you assess and manage this?"
Scenario 3: Recurrent Posterior Dislocation
"A 65-year-old man has had three posterior dislocations in 6 months following primary THA via posterior approach. Each has been closed reduced successfully. How do you manage this?"
MCQ Practice Points
Internervous Plane Question
Q: What is the internervous plane for the posterior approach to the hip? A: Between gluteus maximus (inferior gluteal nerve) and gluteus medius (superior gluteal nerve). This is the only hip approach with a true internervous plane.
Sciatic Nerve Location Question
Q: Where does the sciatic nerve run in relation to the greater trochanter? A: Approximately 1cm medial to the greater trochanter and posterior to the acetabulum. It exits the pelvis below the piriformis muscle (85% of patients).
Capsular Repair Question
Q: What is the effect of capsular repair on dislocation rate after posterior approach THA? A: Capsular repair reduces dislocation rate from approximately 7% to 2-3%. This is now considered standard of care for posterior approach.
Dislocation Position Question
Q: What combination of hip positions causes posterior dislocation after posterior approach THA? A: Flexion (over 90 degrees) + Adduction + Internal Rotation. Common scenarios: getting out of low chair, tying shoes, picking up objects from floor.
Short External Rotators Question
Q: What is the difference between the Moore and Southern modifications of the posterior approach? A: Moore approach: Divides piriformis and all short external rotators. Southern approach: Preserves piriformis, divides only obturator internus and gemelli. Both require capsular repair - more important than piriformis preservation.
Australian Context and Exam Preparation
AOANJRR Data:
- Posterior approach: 35% of primary THAs in Australia
- Second most common approach (lateral is 40%, anterior 20%)
- Dislocation rates declining with routine capsular repair protocols
- No difference in long-term revision rates between approaches
Training implications:
- Essential skill for Orthopaedic exam and practice
- Most Australian fellowship programs teach posterior as one of two primary approaches
- Understanding of both posterior and lateral approaches expected
Enhanced Recovery Protocols:
- Australian units increasingly adopting enhanced recovery (ERAS)
- Posterior approach with capsular repair compatible with ERAS
- Reduced or no hip precautions if capsule repaired
Orthopaedic Exam Preparation
For Orthopaedic clinical and viva exam, you must know: (1) True internervous plane (Gmax vs GM), (2) Sciatic nerve location and protection, (3) Moore vs Southern modifications, (4) Mandatory capsular repair to reduce dislocation, (5) Dislocation risk position (flexion + adduction + IR), (6) Management of sciatic nerve palsy and recurrent dislocation.
POSTERIOR APPROACH TO HIP
High-Yield Exam Summary