Minimally Invasive Posterior THA
Surgical technique guide for Minimally Invasive Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty - FRCS Orth exam preparation
Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team
Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team
MINIMALLY INVASIVE POSTERIOR THA
Mini-posterior approach | Arthroplasty
POGO-Q
REPAIR
Critical Danger Structures
Sciatic Nerve
Posterior to short external rotators. Location: Exits pelvis below piriformis, runs over gemelli and obturator internus, then over quadratus femoris. Protection: KNEE FLEXION relaxes nerve; release rotators at femoral insertion (not proximally); avoid aggressive posterior retraction; maintain awareness during all steps.
Superior Gluteal Neurovascular Bundle
Above piriformis. Location: Exits greater sciatic notch superior to piriformis, courses between gluteus medius and minimus. Protection: Do NOT extend gluteus maximus split more than 5cm above greater trochanter; avoid forceful proximal retraction.
Inferior Gluteal Nerve and Vessels
Below piriformis. Location: Exits below piriformis, supplies gluteus maximus. Protection: Careful dissection near piriformis; avoid blind dissection posterior to rotators; preserve to maintain gluteus maximus function.
Medial Circumflex Femoral Artery
Deep to quadratus femoris. Location: Branch of profunda femoris, passes between quadratus femoris and adductor magnus, supplies femoral head. Protection: Avoid aggressive deep retraction below quadratus femoris; gentle quadratus release if needed.
Femoral Nerve and Vessels
Anterior to hip capsule. Location: Femoral nerve, artery, vein in femoral triangle anteriorly. Protection: Avoid overly anterior acetabular retractor placement; check retractor position during cup insertion; protect with anterior labrum.
Comparison: Minimally Invasive vs Standard Posterior Approach
| Feature | MIS Posterior | Standard Posterior |
|---|---|---|
| Incision length | 6-10cm | 15-20cm |
| Muscle approach | Gluteus maximus split | Same |
| Rotator management | Tag and repair | Same (essential) |
| Visualization | Specialized retractors, lighting | Direct |
| Learning curve | Steeper | Established |
| Complications | Same when done well | Same |
| Recovery | Possibly faster early | Standard |
Key Points:
- Same surgical principles apply to both
- Posterior repair ESSENTIAL in both
- MIS requires specialized instrumentation
- Cosmetic benefit but no proven long-term advantage
- Surgeon experience more important than incision length
Evidence:
- No significant difference in long-term outcomes
- Early recovery advantages debated
- Learning curve associated with higher early complication rates
Positioning and Preparation
Patient Position: Lateral decubitus on standard operating table
Setup:
- Bean bag or pelvic posts for stable pelvic positioning
- Operative leg freely draped for full mobility
- Ensure pelvis is truly vertical - affects cup orientation
- Arm support and all pressure points padded
Key Considerations:
- Pelvic tilt DIRECTLY affects cup orientation measurements
- Tilted pelvis causes malpositioned cup if not recognized
- Mark bony landmarks before draping (ASIS, GT, posterior iliac spine)
- Confirm leg length markers before incision
Operative Technique
Step 1: POSITIONING AND LANDMARKS
POSITIONING: Lateral decubitus with pelvis stabilized by anterior and posterior posts or bean bag. Confirm pelvis is vertical - any tilt affects cup orientation. Operative leg freely mobile for dislocation and manipulation. Mark greater trochanter and intended incision line.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: LATERAL DECUBITUS is standard for posterior approach. PELVIC TILT directly affects cup position - if tilted anteriorly, measured anteversion will be LESS than actual. Ensure true vertical pelvis positioning.
Dangers at this step
- Pelvic tilt causing cup malposition (unrecognized tilt = maloriented cup)
- Inadequate stabilization allowing pelvic movement
- Pressure injuries from prolonged positioning
Step 2: INCISION AND SUPERFICIAL DISSECTION
INCISION: MIS posterior = 6-10cm (vs 15-20cm standard). Centered over or slightly posterior to greater trochanter. Oblique direction from posterosuperior to anteroinferior, following gluteus maximus fibers. Incise skin and subcutaneous tissue. Identify fascia lata and gluteus maximus fascia.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: MINI-POSTERIOR = 6-10cm incision. Same surgical principles as standard posterior - just smaller window. Requires specialized retraction and lighting. Do NOT compromise on safety for incision size.
Dangers at this step
- Incision too small limiting visualization and increasing tissue trauma
- Excessive skin retraction causing edge necrosis
- Wrong incision placement compromising exposure
Step 3: GLUTEUS MAXIMUS SPLIT
GLUTEUS MAXIMUS: Incise gluteus maximus fascia in line with muscle fibers. Split gluteus maximus BLUNTLY between fibers - this is muscle-splitting, NOT detachment. Limit split to 5cm above greater trochanter to protect SUPERIOR GLUTEAL NEUROVASCULAR BUNDLE. Insert self-retaining or specialized MIS retractors.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: GLUTEUS MAXIMUS SPLIT - blunt dissection in line with fibers. Do NOT extend more than 5cm proximal to GT - superior gluteal nerve exits above piriformis and courses between glut med/min. Injury causes Trendelenburg gait.
Dangers at this step
- Superior gluteal nerve injury from excessive proximal split
- Excessive muscle damage from forceful retraction
- Gluteus maximus denervation from inferior gluteal nerve injury
Step 4: IDENTIFY SHORT EXTERNAL ROTATORS
IDENTIFY SHORT EXTERNAL ROTATORS: Expose posterior hip capsule and overlying short external rotators. From superior to inferior: piriformis (key landmark), gemelli with obturator internus between, quadratus femoris. Sciatic nerve exits BELOW piriformis and runs posterior to these muscles.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: POGO-Q mnemonic for rotators (Piriformis, Obturator internus, Gemelli, Obturator externus, Quadratus). SCIATIC NERVE exits inferior to piriformis in 90% (may split piriformis in 10%). Always know its location.
Dangers at this step
- Sciatic nerve injury from blind dissection
- Failure to identify correct anatomy
- Damage to inferior gluteal nerve and vessels
Step 5: TAG AND RELEASE SHORT EXTERNAL ROTATORS
TAG AND RELEASE ROTATORS: Place tagging sutures in piriformis and conjoined tendon (superior gemellus, obturator internus, inferior gemellus) BEFORE release. Incise rotators close to their femoral insertion (away from sciatic nerve). Protect quadratus femoris if possible (MCFA runs deep to it). Maintain knee flexed to relax sciatic nerve.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: TAG rotators with sutures BEFORE cutting - this is CRITICAL for repair. Release at femoral insertion, NOT proximally near nerve. Piriformis + conjoined tendon most important for repair. Knee flexion protects sciatic nerve.
Dangers at this step
- Inadequate tagging preventing later repair (increases dislocation)
- Sciatic nerve injury during rotator release (release close to femur)
- MCFA injury with aggressive quadratus release
Step 6: CAPSULOTOMY
CAPSULOTOMY: Expose posterior capsule. Perform T-shaped or L-shaped capsulotomy. TAG capsule edges for repair. Clear capsule from acetabular rim as needed for exposure. The capsule is an important stabilizer - preserve for repair.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: TAG CAPSULE for repair - capsular repair + rotator repair together reduce dislocation to less than 1-2%. T-capsulotomy: vertical along margin, horizontal at neck. Both capsule AND rotators must be repaired.
Dangers at this step
- Failure to tag capsule preventing repair
- Excessive capsule excision compromising repair
- Injury to labrum affecting press-fit stability
Step 7: HIP DISLOCATION
HIP DISLOCATION: Dislocate hip posteriorly with flexion, adduction, internal rotation. May use corkscrew device in femoral head to control dislocation. Controlled dislocation prevents fracture. Remove femoral head after neck osteotomy if preferred.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: POSTERIOR DISLOCATION = FLEXION, ADDUCTION, INTERNAL ROTATION. Controlled technique prevents fracture. Some surgeons prefer neck cut in situ then extraction. Corkscrew provides control during dislocation.
Dangers at this step
- Uncontrolled dislocation causing soft tissue damage
- Femoral neck fracture with forceful dislocation
- Acetabular rim fracture with leveraging
Step 8: FEMORAL NECK OSTEOTOMY AND HEAD REMOVAL
FEMORAL NECK OSTEOTOMY: Neck cut with oscillating saw per template. Standard 45° angle from lesser trochanter. Remove femoral head. Excellent visualization of femoral canal is a KEY ADVANTAGE of posterior approach.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: FEMORAL EXPOSURE is EXCELLENT in posterior approach - major advantage over anterior approaches. Direct visualization of canal for accurate broaching and stem placement. Version typically 10-15° anteversion.
Dangers at this step
- Incorrect neck cut level affecting leg length/offset
- Femoral calcar fracture during head removal
- Inadequate bone removal causing femoral fracture during broaching
Step 9: FEMORAL PREPARATION
FEMORAL PREPARATION: Box osteotome to open canal. Sequential broaching with trial stems. Ensure appropriate version (10-15° anteversion typically). Posterior approach allows direct visualization of canal and version. Confirm stable broach seating before final implant.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: Femoral version is DIRECTLY visualized in posterior approach - align with posterior femoral condyles as reference. Canal preparation straightforward with direct visualization. Avoid varus or retroversion.
Dangers at this step
- Incorrect version (excessive anteversion increases anterior dislocation risk)
- Femoral fracture from aggressive broaching
- Varus stem positioning from inadequate lateralization
Step 10: ACETABULAR EXPOSURE AND PREPARATION
ACETABULAR EXPOSURE: Retractors around acetabulum - anterior (inferior to ASIS), inferior (in obturator foramen), posterior as needed. Retract femur anteriorly with bone hook or dedicated retractor. Sequential reaming to bleeding subchondral bone. Maintain peripheral rim for press-fit.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: Femur must be retracted ANTERIORLY for acetabular visualization. Target cup position: 40° ± 10° inclination, 15° ± 10° anteversion (Lewinnek). Combined anteversion (cup + stem) = 25-45° for stability.
Dangers at this step
- Cup malposition (most common technical error in THA)
- Anterior wall perforation with over-medialization
- Femoral nerve injury from aggressive anterior retraction
Step 11: ACETABULAR COMPONENT IMPLANTATION
ACETABULAR IMPLANTATION: Press-fit cup with 1-2mm under-ream. Confirm position before final impaction. Supplemental screws if questionable fixation. Insert liner (polyethylene, ceramic, or dual mobility per plan).
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: Cup orientation by direct visualization or with guides. In lateral decubitus, account for pelvic position. Navigation can improve accuracy if available. Confirm rigid fixation before liner insertion.
Dangers at this step
- Cup malposition causing impingement or dislocation
- Inadequate press-fit (consider screws if any movement)
- Liner malseating
Step 12: FEMORAL COMPONENT IMPLANTATION
FEMORAL IMPLANTATION: Insert final femoral stem (cemented or press-fit per plan). Confirm version and stable seating. Trial head for stability and leg length assessment.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: Posterior approach allows excellent femoral component insertion. Confirm appropriate version by aligning with posterior condyles. Trial extensively before final head placement.
Dangers at this step
- Incorrect version (critical for stability)
- Periprosthetic fracture during insertion
- Cement extravasation (if cemented technique)
Step 13: TRIAL REDUCTION AND STABILITY TESTING
TRIAL REDUCTION: Reduce hip with trial head. Test stability in ALL positions, especially the POSTERIOR DISLOCATION POSITION - flexion, adduction, internal rotation. This is the position of risk with posterior approach. Assess leg length with contralateral comparison. Confirm adequate soft tissue tension.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: CRITICAL to test stability in POSTERIOR DISLOCATION POSITION - flexion past 90°, adduction, internal rotation. If unstable: larger head, higher offset, constrained liner, or adjust components. Document stable ROM achieved.
Dangers at this step
- Unrecognized instability (will dislocate postoperatively)
- Leg length discrepancy (measure carefully)
- Over-lengthening (sciatic nerve risk if more than 4cm)
Step 14: FINAL COMPONENTS AND REDUCTION
FINAL COMPONENTS: Insert definitive head. Reduce hip. Final stability check. Confirm leg length and offset acceptable. Irrigate joint thoroughly.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: Final components should replicate trial findings. Head size affects stability - larger heads (32mm, 36mm) more stable. Adequate offset restores abductor tension and posterior soft tissue tension.
Dangers at this step
- Component mismatch from trial
- Inadequate irrigation leaving debris
- Failure to confirm final stability
Step 15: POSTERIOR REPAIR - CRITICAL STEP
POSTERIOR REPAIR: THE KEY TO MODERN POSTERIOR APPROACH SUCCESS. Create 2-3 drill holes in posterior facet of greater trochanter. Pass transosseous sutures. First repair posterior capsule to bone. Then repair short external rotators (piriformis + conjoined tendon) over capsule as second layer. Creates posterior soft tissue tension band preventing posterior dislocation.
Exam Pearl
Technical Tip: EXAM KEY: POSTERIOR REPAIR = CAPSULE + ROTATORS through bone tunnels. Reduces dislocation from 4-5% to 1-2%. This is THE difference in modern posterior approach. Both layers important - capsule first, then rotators over top.
Dangers at this step
- Inadequate repair strength (use transosseous, not soft tissue only)
- Failure to repair one or both layers
- Trochanter fracture from aggressive drilling
Closure and Post-operative
Closure:
- Irrigate wound thoroughly (minimum 3L)
- Gluteus maximus fascia reapproximated
- Subcutaneous closure with absorbable sutures
- Skin closure (staples or subcuticular)
- Sterile dressing
Post-operative Care:
- Weight bearing as tolerated immediately
- Hip precautions 6-12 weeks:
- Avoid flexion more than 90°
- Avoid adduction past midline
- Avoid internal rotation
- VTE prophylaxis per institutional protocol
- Standard THA rehabilitation pathway
Complications
Minimally Invasive Posterior THA Complications
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
"You are performing a posterior approach THA. Describe the importance of posterior repair and your technique for performing it."
"How do you protect the sciatic nerve during the posterior approach to the hip?"
"Compare the posterior approach to the direct anterior approach for primary THA. When would you choose each?"
Minimally Invasive Posterior THA - Exam Summary
High-Yield Exam Summary
References:
- Pellicci PM, et al. Posterior approach to total hip replacement: results of 526 consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80(4):519-525.
- Kwon MS, et al. Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:34-38.
- Goldstein WM, et al. Posterior soft-tissue repair in primary total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(10):1496-1500.
- Berry DJ, et al. Posterior approach THA: comparison with and without soft tissue repair. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(6 Suppl):132-137.
- Chechik O, et al. Surgical approach and prosthesis fixation in hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Hip Int. 2009;19(1):44-48.
- Weeden SH, Paprosky WG. Minimal incision total hip arthroplasty: posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:227-234.
- Ogonda L, et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(4):701-710.
- Demos HA, et al. Surgical approach and dislocation rate in primary total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(2):139-146.
- Masonis JL, Bourne RB. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:46-53.
- Sibia US, et al. Incidence and risk factors for sciatic nerve injury in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(8):2431-2434.