Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • For Training Programs
  • Authors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Methodology
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Back to Operative Surgery
Foot & Ankle

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fracture

Comprehensive surgical technique guide for ORIF of ankle fractures including Weber/Lauge-Hansen classification, syndesmotic assessment, and fixation strategies - FRCS exam preparation

Core Procedure
intermediate
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Orthopaedic clinicians and medical editors • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Editorial boardMethodologyReview policyReport a correction
High Yield Overview

OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERNAL FIXATION OF ANKLE FRACTURE

Weber/Lauge-Hansen classification guides management | Syndesmotic assessment critical | Restore mortise anatomy

foot-ankleSubspecialty
12Key Steps
5Danger Zones
60-90minDuration

Critical Must-Knows

  • Weber B with talar shift greater than 1mm, all Weber C, bimalleolar, and trimalleolar fractures require ORIF
  • Syndesmotic injury must be assessed after bony fixation - tibiofibular clear space less than 6mm, overlap greater than 6mm
  • Fibula length restoration critical - 2mm shortening causes significant talar shift and poor outcomes
  • Posterior malleolus: fix if greater than 25-33% OR any posterior talar subluxation

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Know Weber AND Lauge-Hansen classifications - examiners expect both and how they relate to stability
  • "
    Be specific about syndesmotic assessment: 'I would perform external rotation stress test under fluoroscopy looking for tibiofibular clear space greater than 6mm or medial clear space widening'
  • "
    Posterior malleolus debate: Know both 25% and 33% thresholds exist. More important is posterior talar subluxation
  • "
    Fixation sequence: 'Fix fibula first to restore length, then medial malleolus, then assess syndesmosis, finally posterior malleolus if needed'
Mnemonic

MORTISE

M
Medial clear space less than 4mm
O
Overlap tibiofibular greater than 6mm AP, greater than 1mm mortise
R
Rotation of fibula assessed on lateral view
T
Tibiofibular clear space less than 6mm
I
Integrity of posterior malleolus
S
Symmetric talar dome coverage
E
Equal joint space throughout mortise
Mnemonic

FMSP

F
Fibula first - restore length and rotation
M
Medial malleolus next - restore articular surface
S
Syndesmosis assessment - stress test after bony fixation
P
Posterior malleolus if indicated (greater than 25-33% or subluxation)

Critical Danger Structures

Superficial Peroneal Nerve

Location: Emerges from anterior compartment 10-12cm proximal to lateral malleolus tip. May cross operative field in distal fibula exposure. Protection: Incision POSTERIOR to fibula, careful retraction if visualized.

Saphenous Vein and Nerve

Location: Anterior and superior to medial malleolus, running with great saphenous vein. Protection: Incision posterior to subcutaneous tibial border, identify and protect anteriorly.

Sural Nerve

Location: Posterior to lateral malleolus, 1.5-2cm posterior to fibula at joint level, runs with lesser saphenous vein. Protection: Avoid posterior dissection, minimize posterolateral retraction.

Posterior Tibial Neurovascular Bundle

Location: Posterior to medial malleolus, deep to flexor retinaculum (Tom, Dick, And Nervous Harry). Protection: Stay anterior with medial approach, avoid posterior dissection.

Peroneal Tendons

Location: Directly posterior to fibula in retromalleolar groove. Protection: Subperiosteal dissection, avoid posterior stripping, protect with retractors during plating.

Surgical Indications

Absolute Indications

  • Weber B with instability: Talar shift greater than 1mm, medial clear space greater than 4mm, positive stress test
  • Weber C fractures: All require ORIF plus syndesmotic fixation (syndesmosis always injured)
  • Bimalleolar fractures: Unstable by definition - requires fixation of both malleoli
  • Trimalleolar fractures: Fix lateral, medial, and posterior malleolus if greater than 25-33% or subluxation
  • Open fractures: Urgent irrigation, debridement, and fixation
  • Irreducible dislocations: Closed reduction failed, interposed periosteum/tendon
  • Neurovascular compromise: Urgent reduction required

Relative Indications

  • Weber A with displacement: Usually stable but fix if significant displacement or rotation
  • Isolated medial malleolus: Fix if greater than 2mm displacement
  • Young active patients: Lower threshold for operative management
  • Failed non-operative treatment: Displacement in cast, loss of reduction

Contraindications

  • Absolute: Active infection, severe peripheral vascular disease with non-healing potential
  • Relative: Significant medical comorbidities, non-ambulatory patients, severe neuropathy with Charcot risk, poor soft tissue envelope (delay surgery)

Exam Pearl

Stability Assessment Key: Weber B is the "grey zone" - 50% have syndesmotic injury. Must stress test! Weber B with medial tenderness, medial clear space greater than 4mm, or positive stress test = unstable = surgery.

Soft Tissue Timing

Wrinkle Test Must Be Positive: If skin wrinkles with ankle dorsiflexion = adequate soft tissue recovery. If not, delay surgery 5-14 days. Operating through swollen tissues leads to 20-30% wound complication rate versus 2-5% with adequate soft tissue envelope.

Weber Classification (Anatomical)

TypeFibula Fracture LevelSyndesmosisStabilityTreatment
ABelow syndesmosisIntactStableUsually non-operative
BAt syndesmosis levelVariable (50% injured)VariableORIF if displaced/unstable
CAbove syndesmosisAlways injuredUnstableORIF + syndesmotic fixation

Exam Pearl

Weber Key: Tells you anatomical level and predicted syndesmotic status. Weber B is the "grey zone" - must stress test! Weber C = always fix syndesmosis.

Lauge-Hansen Classification (Mechanism-Based)

TypeFrequencyFoot PositionForceInjury Pattern
SER60%SupinatedExternal RotationStage I: AITFL → Stage II: Spiral fibula → Stage III: PITFL/post mal → Stage IV: Medial mal/deltoid
SA20%SupinatedAdductionStage I: Transverse lateral mal → Stage II: Vertical medial mal
PER10%PronatedExternal RotationStage I: Medial mal/deltoid → Stage II: AITFL → Stage III: Spiral fibula above syndesmosis → Stage IV: PITFL
PA5%PronatedAbductionStage I: Medial mal/deltoid → Stage II: AITFL/syndesmosis → Stage III: Comminuted fibula

Exam Pearl

Lauge-Hansen Key: Tells you mechanism and predicts associated injuries. SER Stage IV = Weber B with all ligaments injured. Understanding mechanism helps predict what other structures may be damaged.

Classification Correlation

Know BOTH systems for exam: Weber tells WHERE (anatomical), Lauge-Hansen tells HOW (mechanism). Examiners expect you to correlate: "This is a Weber B, or SER Stage II, injury..."

Ankle Joint Anatomy

Osseous Anatomy

  • Mortise: Tibial plafond, medial malleolus, lateral malleolus, posterior malleolus
  • Talus: Wider anteriorly by 2-4mm (critical for syndesmotic reduction)
  • Incisura fibularis: Tibial groove for fibula - syndesmosis sits here
  • Fibula: 1cm more distal than medial malleolus, rotated 15-25° externally

Ligamentous Structures

  • Syndesmosis: AITFL (anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament), PITFL (posterior), IOL (interosseous ligament), IT (inferior transverse ligament)
  • Lateral complex: ATFL, CFL, PTFL
  • Deltoid: Superficial (tibionavicular, tibiocalcaneal, tibiotalar) and deep (deep tibiotalar)

Neurovascular Structures

  • Superficial peroneal nerve: Exits anterior compartment 10-12cm proximal to lateral malleolus tip, runs anterolaterally
  • Sural nerve: 1.5-2cm posterior to fibula at joint level, runs with lesser saphenous vein
  • Saphenous vein/nerve: Anterior to medial malleolus, with great saphenous vein
  • Posterior tibial NV bundle: Posterior to medial malleolus in tarsal tunnel (Tom, Dick, And Nervous Harry)
  • Peroneal tendons: Directly posterior to fibula in retromalleolar groove

Exam Pearl

Critical Anatomy for Exam: "The talus is wider anteriorly by 2-4mm. This is why we MUST reduce the syndesmosis with the ankle in DORSIFLEXION - the wider anterior talus forces the fibula into anatomic position. Plantarflexed reduction leads to overtightening."

Nerve Protection Strategy

Lateral Incision: POSTERIOR to fibula protects superficial peroneal nerve anteriorly. Medial Incision: POSTERIOR to subcutaneous tibial border protects saphenous structures anteriorly. Posterior Approach: Risk to sural nerve - keep 1.5-2cm from fibula.

Intraoperative Syndesmotic Stress Testing

When to Test: After ALL bony fixation complete (cannot assess with unstable malleoli)

External Rotation Stress Test:

  • Ankle in dorsiflexion (talus widest anteriorly)
  • Neutral rotation
  • Apply external rotation force to foot
  • Observe under fluoroscopy for widening

Cotton Test (Hook Test):

  • Lateral force applied to talus and fibula with bone hook
  • Should not displace laterally more than 2mm

Abnormal Parameters:

MeasurementNormalAbnormal
Tibiofibular clear spaceLess than 6mmGreater than 6mm
Tibiofibular overlap (AP)Greater than 6mmLess than 6mm
Tibiofibular overlap (Mortise)Greater than 1mmLess than 1mm
Medial clear spaceLess than 4mmGreater than 4mm

Exam Pearl

Syndesmotic Malreduction: Number ONE cause of poor outcomes after ankle fracture ORIF. Up to 50% malreduced in some series. Must assess AFTER bony fixation with stress testing under fluoroscopy. Compare to contralateral if in doubt.

Critical Reduction Technique

For syndesmotic fixation: Ankle DORSIFLEXED (wider anterior talus), NEUTRAL rotation (internal rotation malreduces), clamp 2-3cm proximal to joint in AP direction. Confirm reduction on fluoroscopy BEFORE fixing.

Posterior Malleolus Management

Indications for Fixation:

  • Greater than 25-33% of articular surface (controversial threshold)
  • ANY posterior talar subluxation (absolute indication - more important than size!)
  • Syndesmotic instability (large fragments contribute to stability)
  • Step-off greater than 2mm

Fixation Options:

TechniqueApproachAdvantagesDisadvantages
Indirect (A-P screws)Via lateral approachLess dissection, fasterNo direct visualization
Direct buttress platePosterolateralDirect visualization, better reductionMore dissection, prone position

CT Assessment: Essential for accurate sizing - plain films underestimate by 30%

Exam Pearl

Critical Point: Size matters LESS than subluxation - a 20% fragment with posterior talar shift NEEDS fixation! The posterior malleolus contributes to syndesmotic stability and talar containment. PITFL attaches to posterior malleolus.

Imaging Requirement

CT Scan: Obtain preoperatively for all trimalleolar fractures. Plain films underestimate posterior malleolus size by 30%. CT shows fragment size, comminution, and posterior subluxation.

Consent Discussion

Expected Outcomes

  • Union rate: Greater than 95% with adequate fixation
  • Return to activity: 3-6 months for most activities
  • Long-term function: 80-90% good to excellent outcomes with anatomic reduction
  • Post-traumatic arthritis: 15-40% at 10 years (higher with residual incongruity)

Risks to Discuss

Common (greater than 5%):

  • Symptomatic hardware requiring removal (10-30%)
  • Stiffness (10-20%)
  • Swelling (permanent in 20-30%)
  • Wound healing problems if soft tissues compromised

Less Common (1-5%):

  • Infection (2-5% closed fractures, higher for open)
  • Nerve injury (superficial peroneal, saphenous - usually temporary)
  • DVT/PE (1-2% with prophylaxis)
  • Syndesmotic malreduction (up to 50% in some series)

Rare but Serious (less than 1%):

  • Non-union (less than 5%)
  • Compartment syndrome (rare but devastating)
  • Complex regional pain syndrome

Alternative Treatments

  • Non-operative: Weber A, truly stable Weber B (no talar shift), elderly non-ambulatory
  • External fixation: Severe soft tissue injury, open fractures, bridging until soft tissue recovery

Exam Pearl

Australian Context (Medicare MBS): Ankle ORIF typically MBS item 47528 (malleolar fracture ORIF). Syndesmotic screw removal may require separate procedure. Document instability and syndesmotic injury status for appropriate coding.

Evidence Summary

Key Evidence Points:

  • 2mm fibular shortening causes 42% decrease in tibiotalar contact area (Thordarson 1997)
  • Syndesmotic malreduction in up to 50% of cases (Gardner 2006)
  • Suture-button vs screws: Both effective, suture-button allows micromotion, no removal needed (Kortekangas 2015)
  • Posterior malleolus: Subluxation more predictive of outcomes than fragment size (Miller 2010)

Positioning and Preparation

Patient Position: Supine with bump under ipsilateral hip for 15-30° internal rotation (brings lateral malleolus up). Radiolucent table essential.

Surgical Approach: Lateral approach posterior to fibula. Medial approach posterior to subcutaneous tibial border. Posterolateral for direct posterior malleolus fixation.

Incision:

  • Lateral: 8-10cm posterior to fibular shaft, from 8-10cm proximal to tip distally to joint line
  • Medial: 5-7cm just posterior to subcutaneous tibial border, centered on medial malleolus

Pre-operative Considerations:

  • Wrinkle test must be positive (adequate soft tissue)
  • If significant swelling: delay 5-14 days
  • CT for posterior malleolus assessment
  • Document baseline neurovascular status

Operative Technique

Step 1: Pre-operative Assessment and Classification

Examine patient for soft tissue envelope - wrinkle sign indicates safe to proceed. Document neurovascular status: dorsalis pedis, posterior tibial pulses, and sensation in all nerve distributions. Review imaging with both Weber AND Lauge-Hansen classifications. CT scan for posterior malleolus sizing. Plan fixation sequence.

Exam Pearl

Examiner Question: "How do you assess the soft tissue envelope for surgery timing?"

Model Answer: "I assess for the 'wrinkle sign' - the ability to wrinkle the skin over the ankle with passive dorsiflexion indicates adequate soft tissue recovery and it's safe to proceed. If the skin is tense without wrinkles, I delay surgery 5-14 days with elevation and ice. Operating through swollen tissues leads to 20-30% wound complication rates versus 2-5% with recovered soft tissues."

Pre-operative Checklist

  • Confirm neurovascular status documented pre-operatively (baseline for comparison)
  • Review CT for posterior malleolus sizing (plain films underestimate by 30%)
  • Know both Weber AND Lauge-Hansen classification before entering OR
  • Plan fixation sequence: FMSP (Fibula, Medial, Syndesmosis, Posterior)

Step 2: Patient Positioning and Setup

Supine on radiolucent table with bump under ipsilateral hip (15-30° internal rotation). Contralateral leg positioned to allow C-arm mortise views. Thigh tourniquet (250-300mmHg). Test ALL fluoroscopic views before prepping: AP, mortise (15-20° internal rotation), lateral. C-arm from contralateral side.

Exam Pearl

Critical Setup Point: The bump under the hip (15-30° internal rotation) brings the lateral malleolus UP - this provides optimal access to the fibula. Testing fluoroscopy BEFORE prepping is essential - a true mortise view (15-20° internal rotation of the leg) must be achievable.

Positioning Complications Prevention

  • Thigh tourniquet 250-300mmHg (not calf - peroneal nerve risk)
  • Pad all pressure points - fibular head, malleoli, heel
  • Test ALL fluoroscopy views BEFORE prepping - repositioning sterile patient is problematic
  • Ensure contralateral leg positioned to allow C-arm access for mortise view

Step 3: Lateral Approach - Fibula Exposure

Mark incision POSTERIOR to fibular shaft (protects superficial peroneal nerve anteriorly). Incise 8-10cm from proximal to tip. Careful dissection through subcutaneous tissue - identify and protect any nerve branches. Incise periosteum longitudinally. Subperiosteal dissection anteriorly and posteriorly (protects peroneal tendons).

Exam Pearl

Examiner Question: "Where do you place your lateral incision for fibula ORIF?"

Model Answer: "I place my incision POSTERIOR to the fibular shaft, not directly lateral. This protects the superficial peroneal nerve which emerges from the anterior compartment 10-12cm proximal to the lateral malleolus tip and runs anterolaterally. By staying posterior, I avoid this nerve. I make an 8-10cm incision centered on the fracture site, and perform subperiosteal dissection to protect the peroneal tendons posteriorly."

Lateral Approach Danger Zones

  • Superficial peroneal nerve: 10-12cm proximal to tip, runs anteriorly - incision POSTERIOR to fibula
  • Sural nerve: 1.5-2cm posterior to fibula at joint level - avoid excessive posterior dissection
  • Peroneal tendons: Directly posterior in retromalleolar groove - subperiosteal dissection protects them
  • If nerve visualized, protect with vessel loop - do NOT divide

Step 4: Fibula Reduction and Fixation

Clear fracture site of interposed tissue. Assess pattern: spiral, oblique, or comminuted.

Reduction Goals:

  • Restore length (compare to contralateral - 2mm shortening is unacceptable)
  • Correct rotation (posterior malleolar fragment provides best guide)
  • Anatomic fracture reduction

Fixation Options by Pattern:

  • Spiral/Long oblique: Lag screw perpendicular to fracture + lateral neutralization plate
  • Short oblique: Antiglide plate posterolaterally (buttress principle)
  • Comminuted: Bridge plating

Exam Pearl

Examiner Question: "How do you achieve lag screw fixation for a spiral fibula fracture?"

Model Answer: "Lag screw technique requires a glide hole (3.5mm) in the near cortex and a thread hole (2.5mm) in the far cortex. The screw must be perpendicular to the FRACTURE LINE, not the bone axis - this provides compression across the fracture. I then add a neutralization plate to protect the lag screw from rotational and bending forces. For spiral fractures greater than 2x fibula diameter, I place the lag screw outside the plate. For shorter spirals, the lag screw can go through the plate."

Fibular Reduction Critical Points

  • Length: 2mm shortening causes 42% decrease in tibiotalar contact area - compare to contralateral!
  • Rotation: Use posterior malleolar fragment as guide for correct fibular rotation
  • Comminution: Do NOT strip periosteum excessively - maintain blood supply
  • Antiglide plate: Position posterolaterally for short oblique fractures - biomechanically superior to lateral plating

Step 5: Confirm Fibular Reduction Fluoroscopically

Obtain mortise and lateral views. Check:

  • Tibiofibular clear space less than 6mm
  • Tibiofibular overlap greater than 6mm on AP
  • Fibular rotation on lateral
  • Length compared to contralateral

If medial clear space remains greater than 4mm after anatomic fibular fixation → either deltoid torn or syndesmosis injured.

Exam Pearl

Examiner Question: "What parameters do you assess on intraoperative fluoroscopy after fibular fixation?"

Model Answer: "I assess the MORTISE parameters: Medial clear space should be less than 4mm and equal to the superior joint space. Tibiofibular clear space should be less than 6mm. Tibiofibular overlap should be greater than 6mm on AP and greater than 1mm on mortise. I also confirm fibular length and rotation on lateral view. If the medial clear space remains greater than 4mm despite anatomic fibular reduction, this indicates either deltoid ligament rupture or syndesmotic injury requiring further intervention."

Fluoroscopy Quality Checks

  • Must obtain TRUE mortise view (15-20° internal rotation) - false readings with poor technique
  • Compare to contralateral ankle if available - anatomic variation exists
  • If tibiofibular clear space greater than 6mm despite fibular fixation, reassess fibular length and rotation
  • Persistent medial clear space widening = additional pathology (deltoid or syndesmosis)

Step 6: Medial Approach - Medial Malleolus

Incision 5-7cm just POSTERIOR to subcutaneous tibial border (protects saphenous vein/nerve anteriorly). Identify and protect saphenous structures. Incise periosteum. Clear any interposed deltoid from fracture site (common cause of non-reduction).

Exam Pearl

Examiner Question: "What prevents anatomic reduction of a medial malleolus fracture?"

Model Answer: "The most common cause of inability to reduce a medial malleolus fracture is interposed deltoid ligament in the fracture site. The ligament can get pulled into the fracture gap during injury and physically blocks reduction. I always carefully inspect the fracture site and remove any interposed soft tissue before attempting reduction. Additionally, periosteal interposition can occur. Direct visualization and clearing of the fracture site is essential before reduction."

Medial Approach Danger Zones

  • Saphenous vein/nerve: Anterior to medial malleolus - incision POSTERIOR to tibial border
  • Posterior tibial NV bundle: Deep and posterior - avoid excessive posterior dissection
  • Interposed deltoid: Remove from fracture site or reduction will fail
  • Protect skin edges - medial soft tissues are thin and prone to wound complications

Step 7: Medial Malleolar Fixation

Reduce with pointed reduction clamp. Verify articular reduction (less than 1mm step acceptable).

Fixation Options:

  • Standard: Two parallel 4.0mm partially-threaded cancellous screws
  • Alternative: Tension band wire for transverse fractures
  • Comminuted/Osteoporotic: Buttress plate

Screws directed from tip toward metaphysis, slightly posterolateral. Parallel orientation (convergent spreads fracture, divergent reduces purchase).

Exam Pearl

Examiner Question: "Describe your screw configuration for medial malleolus fixation."

Model Answer: "I use two parallel 4.0mm partially-threaded cancellous screws. Partially-threaded screws provide compression by having threads only in the far fragment while gliding through the near fragment. The entry point is at the tip of the malleolus, directed toward the posterolateral metaphyseal bone where the bone density is best for purchase. I keep the screws parallel - convergent screws can spread the fracture apart, and divergent screws reduce purchase. For vertical fractures (SA pattern), I may use an antiglide plate or buttress plate. For comminuted or osteoporotic bone, buttress plating provides superior fixation."

Medial Malleolar Fixation Pearls

  • Partially-threaded screws: Threads only in far fragment for compression (fully-threaded = no compression)
  • Parallel screws: Convergent spreads fracture, divergent reduces purchase
  • Posterolateral trajectory: Best bone quality in metaphysis
  • Articular step greater than 1mm: Associated with post-traumatic arthritis - accept only if unable to improve
  • Vertical fractures (SA): May need buttress plate, screws alone may fail

Step 8: Syndesmotic Assessment

CRITICAL STEP - Only performed AFTER all bony fixation complete.

External rotation stress test under fluoroscopy:

  • Ankle in dorsiflexion (talus widest)
  • Neutral rotation
  • Apply external rotation force
  • Observe for tibiofibular widening greater than 6mm or medial clear space greater than 4mm

Weber C fractures = ALWAYS assess (syndesmosis injured by definition) Weber B fractures = ASSESS if any doubt

Exam Pearl

Examiner Question: "How do you assess syndesmotic stability intraoperatively?"

Model Answer: "I perform syndesmotic stress testing ONLY after all bony fixation is complete - you cannot accurately assess the syndesmosis with unstable malleoli. I perform the external rotation stress test with the ankle in dorsiflexion (talus is widest anteriorly), neutral rotation, and apply external rotation force to the foot while observing under fluoroscopy. Abnormal findings include tibiofibular clear space greater than 6mm, loss of tibiofibular overlap, or medial clear space widening greater than 4mm. I also perform the Cotton test (hook test) - applying lateral force to the talus and fibula should not cause greater than 2mm lateral displacement. Weber C fractures ALWAYS have syndesmotic injury and require fixation. Weber B fractures have 50% syndesmotic injury rate, so I stress test all Weber B fractures."

Syndesmotic Assessment Errors

  • Testing BEFORE bony fixation is complete = inaccurate (unstable malleoli give false positive)
  • Not dorsiflexing ankle during stress test = may miss instability (talus narrower posteriorly)
  • Accepting tibiofibular clear space greater than 6mm = syndesmotic malreduction, poor outcomes
  • Skipping stress test in Weber B = miss 50% of syndesmotic injuries

Step 9: Syndesmotic Fixation (If Unstable)

Apply large pointed reduction clamp from fibula to tibia, 2-3cm proximal to joint. Critical: ankle in full dorsiflexion, neutral rotation, clamp in AP direction.

Fixation Options:

DeviceTechniqueAdvantagesRemoval
3.5mm cortical screws (x2)3-4 cortices, 2-3cm proximal to jointRigid fixationRemove at 12 weeks (controversial)
Suture-buttonPer manufacturer protocolAllows micromotion, physiologic healingNo removal needed

Exam Pearl

Examiner Question: "Why must the ankle be dorsiflexed during syndesmotic reduction?"

Model Answer: "The talus is 2-4mm wider anteriorly than posteriorly. When I dorsiflex the ankle, I bring the wider anterior portion of the talus into the mortise, which forces the fibula into its anatomic position within the incisura. If I reduce the syndesmosis with the ankle in plantarflexion, the narrower posterior talus allows the fibula to sit too close to the tibia - this causes syndesmotic malreduction and the patient loses dorsiflexion post-operatively. I apply the reduction clamp with the ankle dorsiflexed, in neutral rotation (internal rotation causes malreduction), 2-3cm proximal to the joint, in an AP direction. I confirm reduction on fluoroscopy before fixing with either two 3.5mm cortical screws or suture-button device."

Syndesmotic Reduction Errors

  • Plantarflexed reduction: Narrower posterior talus allows overtightening - loss of dorsiflexion
  • Internal rotation: Malreduces fibula posteriorly in incisura
  • Clamp too close to joint: Risks articular damage, does not recreate physiology
  • Clamp medial-lateral: Overtightens syndesmosis - must be AP direction
  • Confirm reduction on fluoroscopy BEFORE definitive fixation

Step 10: Posterior Malleolus (If Indicated)

Indications: Greater than 25-33% articular surface OR posterior talar subluxation

Indirect Technique:

  • A-P lag screws from lateral approach
  • 3.5mm or 4.0mm screws capturing fragment
  • Fluoroscopy confirms no joint penetration

Direct Technique:

  • Posterolateral approach
  • Direct visualization and buttress plate fixation
  • Better reduction but more dissection

Exam Pearl

Examiner Question: "When do you fix the posterior malleolus and how?"

Model Answer: "I fix the posterior malleolus when it involves greater than 25-33% of the articular surface OR if there is any posterior talar subluxation - subluxation is the more important indication regardless of fragment size. A 20% fragment with posterior subluxation needs fixation. I have two techniques: Indirect fixation using A-P lag screws through the lateral approach is faster with less dissection, but provides no direct visualization. Direct fixation via a posterolateral approach allows direct visualization and buttress plating, achieving better reduction but requiring more dissection and often prone positioning. The posterior malleolus is important because the PITFL attaches to it, so its fixation can contribute to syndesmotic stability."

Posterior Malleolus Considerations

  • Subluxation more important than size: A 20% fragment with posterior shift NEEDS fixation
  • CT is essential: Plain films underestimate fragment size by 30%
  • Indirect screws: Must confirm no joint penetration on lateral fluoroscopy
  • Posterolateral approach: Risk to sural nerve (1.5-2cm posterior to fibula)
  • PITFL attachment: Large posterior fragments contribute to syndesmotic stability

Step 11: Final Fluoroscopic Assessment

Quality control checklist:

  • Medial clear space less than 4mm and symmetric
  • Tibiofibular clear space less than 6mm
  • Tibiofibular overlap greater than 6mm AP, greater than 1mm mortise
  • No talar subluxation (anterior or posterior)
  • Articular congruence on mortise
  • All screws out of joint
  • Posterior malleolar reduction (if fixed)

Compare to contralateral if available. Document images.

Exam Pearl

Examiner Question: "What are the key radiographic parameters you assess at the end of ankle fracture ORIF?"

Model Answer: "I use the MORTISE parameters for quality control. Medial clear space should be less than 4mm and equal to the superior joint space. Tibiofibular clear space should be less than 6mm. Tibiofibular overlap should be greater than 6mm on AP and greater than 1mm on mortise view. I confirm there is no talar subluxation and the articular surface is congruent with no step greater than 1mm. All screws must be out of the joint - I obtain lateral and mortise views to confirm. If I fixed the posterior malleolus, I confirm its reduction. If any parameter is outside acceptable range, I DO NOT leave the operating theatre - I revise immediately. Delayed revision for malreduction has worse outcomes."

Final Assessment Priorities

  • Do NOT accept malreduction: Revise immediately - delayed revision has worse outcomes
  • True mortise view: Must be 15-20° internal rotation for accurate measurements
  • Compare to contralateral: If any doubt about what is "normal" for this patient
  • Document all images: Medicolegal protection and for post-operative comparison
  • Syndesmotic malreduction in up to 50%: Be vigilant - most common cause of poor outcomes

Step 12: Closure and Post-operative Care

Closure: Copious irrigation (3L minimum). Meticulous hemostasis. Close periosteum if possible. Layered skin closure - avoid tension.

Immediate Post-op:

  • Well-padded posterior slab or bulky Jones dressing
  • Leg elevation above heart level
  • DVT prophylaxis per risk

Rehabilitation Protocol:

PhaseTimeActivity
Protection0-2 weeksSplint, NWB, elevation
Early ROM2-6 weeksRemovable boot, NWB, begin ROM
Progressive WB6-12 weeksProgress to FWB
Strengthening12+ weeksPhysiotherapy, return to activities

Syndesmotic screws: Some remove at 12 weeks (controversial). Suture-buttons don't require removal.

Exam Pearl

Examiner Question: "What is your post-operative protocol after ankle fracture ORIF?"

Model Answer: "Immediate post-operatively, I apply a well-padded posterior splint or bulky Jones dressing to protect the reduction and control swelling. The leg is elevated above heart level. I initiate DVT prophylaxis - typically LMWH or aspirin depending on risk factors. For weeks 0-2, the patient is non-weight bearing in a splint. At 2 weeks, I reassess the wound and convert to a removable boot. The patient remains non-weight bearing until 6 weeks, but begins gentle active ROM exercises out of the boot. From 6-12 weeks, I progressively increase weight bearing to full weight bearing as tolerated. Strengthening and proprioception work begins at 12 weeks with formal physiotherapy. For syndesmotic fixation, if I used screws, some surgeons remove them at 12 weeks - this is controversial. If I used suture-buttons, no removal is needed."

Post-operative Priorities

  • Elevation critical: Reduces swelling, promotes wound healing, prevents compartment syndrome
  • DVT prophylaxis: Risk stratified - LMWH for high-risk, aspirin for low-risk (AOANJRR data supports aspirin in low-risk patients)
  • Wound monitoring: Ankle skin is thin - monitor closely for dehiscence, especially medial
  • Early ROM: Begin at 2 weeks to prevent stiffness (ankle most prone to stiffness after fracture)
  • Syndesmotic screw removal: Controversial - evidence shows similar outcomes with or without removal

Complications

Ankle Fracture ORIF Complications

ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
Wound dehiscence/infection (2-5%)Erythema, drainage, fever, wound breakdown within 2-4 weeks post-opWait for wrinkle sign, minimize soft tissue trauma, meticulous hemostasis, perioperative antibioticsSuperficial: oral antibiotics, local wound care. Deep: surgical debridement, IV antibiotics, possibly hardware removal if loose
Syndesmotic malreduction (up to 50%)Persistent lateral pain, ankle instability, widened mortise on follow-up imaging, tibiofibular clear space greater than 6mmIntraoperative stress testing AFTER bony fixation, anatomic fibular reduction first, ankle dorsiflexed during clamp applicationRevision ORIF with syndesmotic correction - outcomes worse with delayed revision
Symptomatic hardware (10-30%)Lateral ankle pain over fibular plate, difficulty with footwear, palpable hardware, pain with direct pressureLow-profile plates, countersink screw heads, discuss with patient pre-operatively about potential removalHardware removal after union confirmed (minimum 12 months). Suture-buttons don't require removal
Post-traumatic arthritis (15-40% at 10 years)Progressive ankle pain and stiffness, joint space narrowing on X-ray, osteophyte formationAnatomic articular reduction (less than 1mm step/gap), restore fibular length within 2mm, correct mortise alignmentConservative: NSAIDs, activity modification, injections. Surgical: debridement, osteophyte excision, fusion or arthroplasty for severe cases
Malunion (fibular shortening/rotation)Persistent talar shift on weight-bearing films, valgus tilt of talus, lateral gutter impingement, medial clear space greater than 4mmRestore fibular length within 2mm, correct rotation using posterior malleolar fragment as guide, intraoperative comparison to contralateralCorrective fibular osteotomy - can improve outcomes even years later if significant malunion
Non-union (less than 5%)Persistent pain and motion at fracture site greater than 6 months, lucency around hardware, hardware looseningStable fixation, address medical comorbidities (diabetes, smoking), adequate nutritionRevision ORIF with bone grafting, address biological factors

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old woman presents after a twisting injury to her ankle. X-rays show a Weber B fracture with 2mm medial clear space widening. The soft tissues are significantly swollen. How would you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a Weber B fracture with evidence of instability given the medial clear space widening. However, the significant swelling is a concern for wound complications if I proceed with immediate surgery. My management would be: First, apply a well-padded posterior splint in neutral position and elevate the limb. I would admit for observation, elevation, and ice therapy. I would reassess the soft tissue envelope daily, looking for the 'wrinkle sign' - the ability to wrinkle the skin over the ankle with passive dorsiflexion, indicating adequate soft tissue recovery. This typically takes 5-14 days. I would obtain a CT scan during this waiting period to assess for any posterior malleolar involvement and better characterize the injury. Once the wrinkle sign is positive, I would proceed with ORIF. The operative plan would be to fix the fibula first to restore length and rotation, then assess the medial side - if the medial clear space normalizes after fibular fixation and stress testing is negative, the deltoid may be intact and I would not open the medial side. If medial clear space remains widened, I would fix the medial malleolus or repair the deltoid. Finally, I would stress test the syndesmosis after bony fixation.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Soft tissue envelope assessment is critical - wrinkle sign indicates safe to proceed
Weber B with medial clear space widening indicates instability requiring ORIF
CT scan helps assess posterior malleolus during waiting period
Fixation sequence: fibula first, then medial, then syndesmosis assessment
Medial clear space may normalize after fibular fixation if deltoid intact
COMMON TRAPS
✗Operating immediately through swollen soft tissues - high wound complication rate
✗Missing the instability markers - medial clear space widening is key finding
✗Forgetting to stress test syndesmosis after bony fixation
✗Not obtaining CT to assess posterior malleolus
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the syndesmosis is unstable on stress testing after you have fixed the fibula and medial malleolus?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"You are fixing a Weber C fracture. After reducing and plating the fibula, you apply a syndesmotic reduction clamp. The registrar questions why you are dorsiflexing the ankle. Explain your rationale and describe your syndesmotic fixation technique."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Excellent question about a critical technical point. I dorsiflexe the ankle because the talus is wider anteriorly than posteriorly - approximately 2-4mm wider. When I apply the syndesmotic clamp with the ankle dorsiflexed, the wider anterior talus forces the fibula into its anatomic position within the incisura. If I were to reduce the syndesmosis with the ankle plantarflexed, the narrower posterior talus would allow the fibula to sit too close to the tibia, resulting in syndesmotic malreduction and loss of reduction when the patient dorsiflexes. For the clamp application, I place it 2-3cm proximal to the joint line, oriented in the anterior-posterior direction. I ensure the ankle is in neutral rotation - internal rotation is another common cause of malreduction. I confirm reduction fluoroscopically, checking the tibiofibular clear space is less than 6mm, overlap is greater than 6mm on AP and greater than 1mm on mortise, and comparing to the contralateral side if available. For fixation, I have two options: cortical screws or suture-button devices. I typically use two 3.5mm cortical screws placed parallel to the joint line, engaging 3-4 cortices. Some surgeons prefer suture-buttons as they allow micromotion and don't require removal. The evidence shows both are effective.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Talus is 2-4mm wider anteriorly - dorsiflexion forces anatomic syndesmotic reduction
Plantarflexed reduction leads to overtightening and loss of dorsiflexion
Clamp applied 2-3cm proximal to joint, in AP direction, neutral rotation
Syndesmotic malreduction is the most common cause of poor outcomes
Screws vs suture-buttons both effective - surgeon preference
COMMON TRAPS
✗Reducing syndesmosis with ankle plantarflexed - causes malreduction
✗Internal rotation during clamp application - another malreduction cause
✗Placing fixation too close to joint line
✗Not checking fluoroscopy to confirm reduction before definitive fixation
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"The senior registrar suggests removing the syndesmotic screws at 12 weeks. What is the evidence for this?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"On your post-operative mortise view, you notice the tibiofibular clear space measures 7mm despite what appeared to be good intraoperative reduction. The fibular plate position looks good. What are your thoughts and what would you do?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is concerning for syndesmotic malreduction, which is reported in up to 50% of cases and is the leading cause of poor outcomes after ankle fracture surgery. I need to critically assess this image and decide whether to revise before leaving the operating theatre. First, I would confirm this is a true mortise view - the ankle must be internally rotated 15-20 degrees to see the mortise clearly. A non-true mortise can give falsely abnormal measurements. If the view is adequate, I would compare to the contralateral ankle if available - there is anatomical variation and comparison is valuable. If the tibiofibular clear space is definitively greater than 6mm and greater than the contralateral side, I would accept this represents malreduction and revise immediately. Revising now is far preferable to delayed revision which has worse outcomes. To revise, I would remove the syndesmotic fixation, reassess my fibular reduction for length and rotation - fibular malreduction can cause apparent syndesmotic widening. If the fibula is anatomic, I would reapply the reduction clamp with the ankle dorsiflexed and in neutral rotation, confirm reduction fluoroscopically, then refix with either screws or a suture-button. I would not leave the operating theatre until I have achieved a tibiofibular clear space less than 6mm and I am satisfied with the reduction.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Syndesmotic malreduction occurs in up to 50% of cases - must be vigilant
Confirm true mortise view (15-20° internal rotation) before making decisions
Compare to contralateral side - anatomical variation exists
Revise immediately if malreduced - delayed revision has worse outcomes
Fibular malreduction can cause apparent syndesmotic widening
COMMON TRAPS
✗Accepting suboptimal reduction and hoping it will be okay
✗Not recognizing that 7mm is outside normal parameters (less than 6mm normal)
✗Blaming the X-ray technique without confirming
✗Leaving theatre without achieving anatomic reduction
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"If you identified this malreduction on the first post-operative clinic X-ray at 2 weeks, would your management be different?"

Ankle Fracture ORIF - Exam Summary

High-Yield Exam Summary

Classification Systems

  • •Weber A/B/C: based on fibula fracture level relative to syndesmosis. A=below (stable), B=at level (variable), C=above (unstable, always fix syndesmosis)
  • •Lauge-Hansen: SER 60% (most common), SA 20%, PER 10%, PA 5%. Tells you mechanism and predicts injuries
  • •Know BOTH systems - examiners expect correlation: 'This is a Weber B, or SER Stage II, injury'
  • •Weber B is the 'grey zone' - 50% have syndesmotic injury, must stress test

Critical Measurements (MORTISE mnemonic)

  • •Medial clear space less than 4mm (equal to superior joint space)
  • •Tibiofibular clear space less than 6mm
  • •Tibiofibular overlap greater than 6mm on AP, greater than 1mm on mortise
  • •2mm fibular shortening causes 42% decrease in tibiotalar contact area - unacceptable
  • •Always obtain TRUE mortise view (15-20° internal rotation) for accurate measurements

Fixation Sequence (FMSP)

  • •Fibula first - restore length and rotation using posterior malleolar fragment as guide
  • •Medial malleolus next - remove interposed deltoid, articular reduction less than 1mm step
  • •Syndesmosis assessment - stress test AFTER bony fixation (cannot assess with unstable malleoli)
  • •Posterior malleolus if greater than 25-33% OR posterior subluxation (subluxation more important than size)

Syndesmotic Fixation Keys

  • •Ankle DORSIFLEXED (talus 2-4mm wider anteriorly - forces anatomic reduction)
  • •NEUTRAL rotation (internal rotation malreduces fibula posteriorly)
  • •Clamp 2-3cm proximal to joint in AP direction (not medial-lateral)
  • •Confirm reduction on fluoroscopy BEFORE definitive fixation
  • •Screws vs suture-button both effective - suture-button doesn't require removal

Danger Structures

  • •Superficial peroneal nerve: 10-12cm proximal to tip, runs anteriorly (incise POSTERIOR to fibula)
  • •Saphenous vein/nerve: anterior to medial malleolus (incise POSTERIOR to tibial border)
  • •Sural nerve: 1.5-2cm posterior to fibula at joint level (posterolateral approach risk)
  • •Posterior tibial NV bundle: posterior to medial malleolus in tarsal tunnel
  • •Peroneal tendons: directly posterior to fibula in retromalleolar groove - subperiosteal dissection protects

Soft Tissue Timing

  • •Wrinkle sign must be positive before surgery - skin wrinkles with ankle dorsiflexion
  • •If swollen, delay surgery 5-14 days with elevation and ice
  • •Operating through swollen tissues: 20-30% wound complication rate
  • •Operating after soft tissue recovery: 2-5% wound complication rate
  • •Ankle soft tissues are unforgiving - be patient with timing

Complications to Know

  • •Syndesmotic malreduction: #1 cause of poor outcomes, up to 50% in some series
  • •Wound dehiscence: 2-5% with proper timing, avoid closing under tension
  • •Hardware symptoms: 10-30%, discuss pre-operatively, removal after union confirmed
  • •Post-traumatic arthritis: 15-40% at 10 years, correlates with reduction quality
  • •Non-union: less than 5%, address smoking, diabetes, nutrition

Exam Pearls

  • •Always mention BOTH Weber and Lauge-Hansen classifications - examiners expect correlation
  • •Syndesmotic malreduction is #1 exam talking point - know how to prevent and recognize
  • •Posterior malleolus: know the debate (25% vs 33%) but emphasize subluxation matters more than size
  • •Always describe stress testing: 'I would perform external rotation stress test with ankle dorsiflexed looking for tibiofibular widening greater than 6mm'
  • •Lag screw technique: glide hole near cortex, thread hole far cortex, perpendicular to fracture line
  • •Australian context: Medicare MBS item 47528, DVT prophylaxis with aspirin acceptable in low-risk patients

References

  1. Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J, Wilson G. Adult ankle fractures—an increasing problem? Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69(1):43-47.

  2. Michelson JD. Fractures about the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(1):142-152.

  3. Gardner MJ, Demetrakopoulos D, Briggs SM, et al. Malreduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(10):788-792.

  4. Miller AN, Carroll EA, Parker RJ, et al. Posterior malleolar stabilization of syndesmotic injuries is equivalent to screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(4):1129-1135.

  5. Sagi HC, Shah AR, Sanders RW. The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(7):439-443.

  6. Egol KA, Pahk B, Walsh M, et al. Outcome after unstable ankle fracture: effect of syndesmotic stabilization. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(1):7-11.

  7. Thordarson DB, Motamed S, Hedman T, et al. The effect of fibular malreduction on contact pressures in an ankle fracture malunion model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(12):1809-1815.

  8. Donken CC, Al-Khateeb H, Verhofstad MH, et al. Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating ankle fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(8):CD008470.

  9. van den Bekerom MP, Haverkamp D, Kloen P. Biomechanical and clinical evaluation of posterior malleolar fractures. A systematic review of the literature. J Trauma. 2009;66(1):279-284.

  10. Kortekangas T, Savola O, Flinkkilä T, et al. A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography. Injury. 2015;46(6):1119-1126.

Quick Stats
Complexityintermediate
Reading Time55 min
Updated2025-12-26
Related

Browse all procedures

View full catalog