Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Posterior Approach to the Elbow

Operative SurgeryShoulder & Elbow
Shoulder & ElbowAdvancedCore Procedure

Posterior Approach to the Elbow

Comprehensive guide to the posterior approach to the elbow including triceps-splitting, triceps-reflecting (Bryan-Morrey), and olecranon osteotomy techniques for distal humerus fractures and total elbow arthroplasty

Procedure console
25 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Triceps management, distal humerus exposure and ulnar nerve protection across three workhorse variations.

3Main technique variations
25-30%Postoperative ulnar neuropathy
15%Triceps weakness if poor repair
95%Exposure adequacy for intra-articular fractures
Critical Must-Knows
  • Ulnar nerve must be identified and protected throughout - postoperative neuropathy affects roughly 25-30%; routine anterior transposition is debated and not clearly protective.
  • Triceps repair is critical - anatomic repair to the olecranon with drill holes prevents extension lag.
  • Three main approaches: triceps-splitting (Van Gorder), triceps-reflecting (Bryan-Morrey), and olecranon osteotomy (chevron).
  • Position crucial - prone or lateral decubitus with the arm over a bolster allows gravity-assisted exposure.
  • Olecranon osteotomy provides the best articular visualization but requires secure fixation and delays rehabilitation.

When & Why


What it exposes. The posterior approach is the workhorse exposure for complex distal humerus fractures, total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and posterior elbow pathology. It gives access to the whole posterior distal humerus, both columns, the olecranon fossa and, once the triceps is managed, the articular surface of the trochlea and capitellum. Indications.

  • Distal humerus fractures, intra-articular and extra-articular - the commonest indication.
  • Total elbow arthroplasty, primary and revision (Bryan-Morrey is the standard).
  • Elbow arthrodesis and excision of heterotopic ossification.
  • Posterior elbow impingement lesions and open contracture release.
  • Olecranon fractures requiring distal fixation and triceps repair after rupture. There is no true internervous plane. Unlike most extensile approaches, the posterior elbow approach does not split between two nerves; it splits or elevates the triceps, which is entirely radial-nerve innervated (C7 to C8). The triceps has three heads - long (infraglenoid tubercle of the scapula), lateral and medial (posterior humerus either side of the radial groove) - converging on a common tendon about 4 cm wide at the olecranon. Because the muscle is not split along an internervous boundary, anatomic repair of any detached or split triceps is mandatory to preserve active elbow extension. Epidemiology and registry context. Distal humerus fractures account for approximately 2 percent of adult fractures (around 5 to 6 per 100,000 per year) with a bimodal distribution - high-energy trauma in young males and low-energy falls in elderly osteoporotic females, the latter rising with an ageing population. A posterior approach is used for essentially all bicolumnar and complex intra-articular fixations and is universal for TEA. Arthroplasty registries (NJR, AOANJRR, SHAR) consistently record TEA as a low-volume procedure, performed mostly for inflammatory arthritis, trauma and post-traumatic sequelae, and primary osteoarthritis. Position and landmarks. The patient is placed prone or in lateral decubitus (operative side up), the arm draped free over a bolster with the elbow flexed 90 degrees so gravity assists soft-tissue retraction. Prone gives bilateral access and a stable field; lateral is easier for the anaesthetist and familiar to shoulder surgeons. Surface landmarks are the olecranon tip, the medial and lateral epicondyles, and the ulnar nerve palpable in the cubital tunnel between the medial epicondyle and the olecranon. A proximal arm tourniquet is inflated to 250 to 300 mmHg and limited to under 120 minutes (released for TEA cementing), and fluoroscopy is set up from the contralateral side with AP and lateral views confirmed before draping. Historical development.
  • 1940 - Van Gorder: triceps tongue and turn-down (splitting), preserving the olecranon insertion for supracondylar exposure.
  • 1982 - Bryan and Morrey: triceps-reflecting technique, raising the extensor mechanism in continuity with the anconeus and forearm fascia.
  • Classic: olecranon osteotomy popularised for maximum articular exposure of comminuted intra-articular fractures.
  • Modern: paratricipital (triceps-on) windows developed to spare the triceps entirely for simple or extra-articular fractures and to triage to arthroplasty. The choice of approach balances exposure against morbidity to the extensor mechanism.
Triceps-splitting (Van Gorder)
What is done to the triceps
Midline split of the raphe, insertion preserved
Best for
Simple or extra-articular fractures, young patients
Trade-off
Limited articular view; about 5% extension lag
Triceps-reflecting (Bryan-Morrey)
What is done to the triceps
Elevated with the anconeus as a continuous sleeve
Best for
Total elbow arthroplasty and complex fractures - most versatile
Trade-off
About 10% extension lag if the repair is poor
Olecranon osteotomy (chevron)
What is done to the triceps
Olecranon osteotomized with the triceps attached
Best for
Severely comminuted intra-articular fractures
Trade-off
Adds a fracture to heal; 6-week rehab delay
Paratricipital (triceps-on)
What is done to the triceps
Left intact, with windows on either side
Best for
Simple fractures and triage to arthroplasty
Trade-off
Very limited exposure
Choosing the triceps-management strategy
VariationWhat is done to the tricepsBest forTrade-off
Triceps-splitting (Van Gorder)Midline split of the raphe, insertion preservedSimple or extra-articular fractures, young patientsLimited articular view; about 5% extension lag
Triceps-reflecting (Bryan-Morrey)Elevated with the anconeus as a continuous sleeveTotal elbow arthroplasty and complex fractures - most versatileAbout 10% extension lag if the repair is poor
Olecranon osteotomy (chevron)Olecranon osteotomized with the triceps attachedSeverely comminuted intra-articular fracturesAdds a fracture to heal; 6-week rehab delay
Paratricipital (triceps-on)Left intact, with windows on either sideSimple fractures and triage to arthroplastyVery limited exposure
Approach selection in one line

Split for simple fractures (it preserves the insertion), reflect (Bryan-Morrey) for TEA and most complex fractures, osteotomize only when the articular surface cannot be visualised any other way, and stay paratricipital when arthroplasty is possible. Meta-analysis shows no functional advantage of osteotomy over a triceps-sparing exposure, so reserve the osteotomy for severe comminution.

The Exposure


Work from the midline posterior incision down to the joint, making the ulnar nerve safe first, then managing the triceps to match the pathology. The sequence below follows the workhorse triceps-reflecting (Bryan-Morrey) exposure; where the splitting or osteotomy variations diverge, the difference is noted at that step.

Posterior elbow approach
Posterior approach to the elbow, elevating or splitting triceps with the ulnar nerve protected.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Exposure sequence

Step 1Incision
  • A midline posterior incision over the triceps and olecranon, beginning about 10 cm proximal to the olecranon tip and extending 8 to 10 cm distally along the subcutaneous border of the ulna, for a total length of 15 to 20 cm.
  • Curve slightly medial or lateral around the olecranon tip so the scar does not sit directly over the pressure point.
  • Raise full-thickness skin and subcutaneous flaps to expose the triceps and olecranon.
Step 2Identify and protect the ulnar nerve - the critical first move
  • Palpate the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel between the medial epicondyle and the olecranon, then gently open the overlying fascia.
  • Mobilise the nerve from the arcade of Struthers proximally down to its entry into flexor carpi ulnaris distally, and loop it with a soft vessel loop.
  • Preserve the recurrent motor branch to FCU, the first branch given off just distal to the epicondyle.
Step 3Decide on ulnar nerve transposition (selective, not routine)
  • In-situ protection suffices for simple cases; anterior subcutaneous transposition moves the nerve anterior to the medial epicondyle; anterior submuscular transposition tucks it beneath the flexor-pronator mass for revision or chronic cubital tunnel cases.
  • Postoperative neuropathy affects around 25 to 30 percent (mostly transient) and routine transposition has not been shown to reduce it - transpose selectively, for example for TEA, when the nerve will overlie hardware, or with pre-existing cubital tunnel symptoms.
  • If transposing, release every compression point (arcade of Struthers, cubital tunnel retinaculum, Osborne ligament, FCU fascia), preserve the medial collateral artery with the nerve, create a generous anterior pocket and ensure no kinking.
Step 4Select the triceps-management strategy
  • Match the technique to the pathology: split the triceps (Van Gorder) for simple fractures, reflect it (Bryan-Morrey) for TEA and complex fractures, osteotomize the olecranon for severe intra-articular comminution, or stay paratricipital when exposure needs are limited or arthroplasty is possible.
Step 5Manage the triceps - reflect, split or osteotomize
  • Bryan-Morrey (reflecting): elevate the medial third and lateral third of the triceps from the olecranon, continuing laterally to include the whole anconeus so the extensor mechanism comes up as a continuous triceps-anconeus sleeve; leave a 2 to 3 mm cuff of tissue on the olecranon for repair and tag the edges with heavy sutures before reflecting proximally.
  • Van Gorder (splitting): split the triceps longitudinally down its midline raphe to the olecranon, preserving the insertion, then elevate medial and lateral flaps off the humerus.
  • Olecranon osteotomy: perform a chevron cut with the apex distal at the deepest point of the trochlear notch (a larger proximal fragment for fixation), mark it with a K-wire and confirm on a lateral fluoroscopy view, complete the bone cut with a saw and then the articular cartilage with a knife, and reflect the olecranon-triceps complex proximally.
Step 6Elevate along the columns and protect the radial nerve
  • Reflect the triceps sleeve (or the medial and lateral flaps) proximally with subperiosteal elevation along the medial and lateral columns of the distal humerus.
  • Stay on bone: the radial nerve lies in the spiral groove more proximally and is at risk with proximal extension or vigorous lateral retraction, while the brachial artery is anterior and threatened by dissection carried too far medially.
Step 7Open the elbow joint
  • Remove the posterior capsule and fat pad to expose the olecranon fossa and the posterior trochlea.
  • Flex the elbow to visualise the articular surface of the trochlea and capitellum - the osteotomy gives the widest view, the reflecting approach an excellent view, and the split only a limited view that requires full flexion.
Step 8Perform the fracture or arthroplasty work
  • For fractures, reconstruct the articular surface first, then reduce the articular block to the shaft, then apply bicolumnar plating - parallel (medial and lateral plates) or perpendicular - with locking screws distally and non-locking screws proximally, confirming no intra-articular hardware on fluoroscopy.
  • For an unreconstructable fracture in an elderly patient, excise the comminuted distal humerus and perform a linked semiconstrained TEA; cemented stems are standard across registries.
Step 9Deliver and confirm fixation or components
  • Verify reduction, implant position and a stable range of motion before closure, confirm secure fixation of any osteotomy, and check that the ulnar nerve lies free of hardware.
The ulnar nerve is the structure most at risk

Postoperative ulnar neuropathy occurs in around 25 to 30 percent of cases and is the most common complication of this approach, although it is mostly transient and permanent iatrogenic injury is under 5 percent. Identify the nerve early in the cubital tunnel, handle it gently with soft loops, decompress the tunnel, and transpose selectively rather than routinely - comparative data do not support routine transposition. Always document preoperative nerve function, since dysfunction from the injury itself is common.

Two details examiners press on

The chevron osteotomy is oriented apex distal to create a larger proximal fragment for stable fixation and to resist proximal displacement by the triceps, and the triceps is repaired through drill holes with the elbow held at 30 degrees of flexion so the repair sits under slight but not excessive tension.

Dangers & Extensions


Structures at risk, by layer.

Cubital tunnel
Structure at risk
Ulnar nerve and its recurrent motor branch to FCU
Protection
Identify first, loop gently, decompress the tunnel, transpose selectively
Proximal humerus and lateral retraction
Structure at risk
Radial nerve in the spiral groove (under 2% injury)
Protection
Stay subperiosteal on bone; avoid aggressive proximal or lateral retraction
Anterior dissection
Structure at risk
Brachial artery and median nerve
Protection
Limit anterior dissection; do not stray medial to the humerus
Nerve transposition
Structure at risk
Medial collateral and posterior ulnar recurrent arteries
Protection
Preserve the medial collateral artery with the ulnar nerve during transposition
Danger structures and how to protect them
LayerStructure at riskProtection
Cubital tunnelUlnar nerve and its recurrent motor branch to FCUIdentify first, loop gently, decompress the tunnel, transpose selectively
Proximal humerus and lateral retractionRadial nerve in the spiral groove (under 2% injury)Stay subperiosteal on bone; avoid aggressive proximal or lateral retraction
Anterior dissectionBrachial artery and median nerveLimit anterior dissection; do not stray medial to the humerus
Nerve transpositionMedial collateral and posterior ulnar recurrent arteriesPreserve the medial collateral artery with the ulnar nerve during transposition

Complications.

  • Ulnar neuropathy - around 25 to 30 percent postoperatively, mostly transient, with permanent iatrogenic injury under 5 percent; prevent with early identification, gentle handling and selective transposition.
  • Extension lag - 10 to 15 percent when the triceps repair is poor; prevent with anatomic repair through drill holes at 30 degrees of flexion.
  • Triceps rupture - under 5 percent, usually a technical failure of fixation and more common in revision surgery; it needs repair or reconstruction.
  • Radial nerve injury - under 2 percent, from proximal triceps elevation or excessive lateral retraction.
  • Osteotomy nonunion or malunion - around 5 to 10 percent; lower with a chevron cut and rigid plate fixation, higher with a transverse cut and early motion.
  • Prominent hardware - up to a 50 percent removal rate after olecranon or osteotomy fixation.
  • Elbow stiffness - 30 to 50 percent have some motion limitation; prevent with early motion and heterotopic ossification prophylaxis in high-risk cases.
  • Infection - 2 to 5 percent superficial and 1 to 3 percent deep; prevent with a single dose of cefazolin 2 g IV within 60 minutes of incision per AAOS, NICE/SIGN and WHO guidance.
  • Heterotopic ossification - 10 to 30 percent radiographic and 5 to 10 percent clinically significant; prophylaxis with indomethacin 75 mg daily for up to 6 weeks, or single-dose radiotherapy (700 to 800 cGy) when NSAIDs are contraindicated. Extensile options. Extend proximally along the posterior humerus to reach the humeral shaft, bearing in mind the radial nerve crossing the spiral groove; the paratricipital windows on either side of the triceps allow limited column access without disturbing the extensor mechanism and are the route of choice when converting to TEA. There is no useful distal extension beyond the proximal forearm. Closure.
  • Triceps repair (Bryan-Morrey): roughen the olecranon and drill 3 to 4 transverse tunnels 5 mm apart through it, pass heavy non-absorbable suture (Ethibond #2 or FiberWire #5) through the tunnels and the triceps-anconeus sleeve, and tie with the elbow at 30 degrees of flexion; close the medial and lateral borders side-to-side to restore contour. For the splitting approach, close the raphe side-to-side - no drill holes are needed.
  • Osteotomy fixation: reduce the osteotomy anatomically and fix with a tension band (two 1.6 mm K-wires and a figure-of-8 18-gauge wire) or, increasingly preferred, a dorsal plate with a lag screw across the osteotomy for more rigid fixation and earlier motion.
  • Close the fascia, the thick subcutaneous layer and the skin in layers; consider a small drain for extensive dissection, and apply a posterior splint with the elbow at 90 degrees and the forearm in neutral rotation.

Procedures Through This Approach


  • Distal humerus ORIF with bicolumnar plating - the principal fracture operation through the posterior exposure.
  • Total elbow arthroplasty - performed through the Bryan-Morrey reflecting approach.
  • Olecranon ORIF and triceps tendon repair - posterior bony and soft-tissue work.
  • Severely comminuted intra-articular fixation is often staged through an olecranon-osteotomy exposure.
  • Elbow arthrodesis, heterotopic ossification excision, posterior impingement decompression and open contracture release.

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

POSTERIORApproach selection guide

P
Pathology dictates approach
Simple versus complex fractures decide the technique
O
Olecranon osteotomy for articular
Best visualization for intra-articular comminution
S
Splitting preserves insertion
Van Gorder triceps-splitting for limited exposure
T
TEA uses Bryan-Morrey
Triceps-reflecting with the anconeus for arthroplasty
E
Extension lag if poor repair
Anatomic repair through drill holes is essential
R
Reflect and tag structures
Tag the triceps before elevation for anatomic repair
I
Identify ulnar nerve first
Locate it in the cubital tunnel before proceeding
O
Osteotomy fixed with tension band
Two K-wires and a figure-of-8 wire, or a plate
R
Rehab delayed with osteotomy
6 weeks protected motion versus immediate for soft-tissue approaches
Mnemonic

ULNAR NERVEUlnar nerve protection strategy

U
Underneath medial epicondyle
Runs in the cubital tunnel - palpate the groove
L
Lies between ME and olecranon
Vulnerable during all posterior approaches
N
Neurolysis and transposition
Decompress and transpose anteriorly, selectively
A
Anterior subcutaneous position
Transposed to an anterior subcutaneous or submuscular pocket
R
Release arcade of Struthers
Release every compression point during mobilization
N
Never forceful traction
Gentle mobilization prevents stretch injury
E
Examine postop immediately
Document motor and sensory function in recovery
R
Recurrent motor branch at risk
First branch to FCU - preserve during mobilization
V
Vessel loops for identification
Use soft loops to mark and protect the nerve
E
Eight percent injury rate
Higher if the nerve is not identified and protected

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Scenario 1: Approach selection for a distal humerus fracture
Clinical prompt

“A 55-year-old woman has a comminuted intra-articular distal humerus fracture (AO/OTA 13-C2) with displaced lines through the trochlea and capitellum after a fall from standing height. She is medically fit. How would you approach this surgically?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Scenario 2: Intraoperative triceps repair in osteoporotic bone
Clinical prompt

“During a Bryan-Morrey approach for a distal humerus fracture in a 70-year-old osteoporotic woman, the first heavy suture pulls through the olecranon drill hole as you tie it. What do you do?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Scenario 3: Managing an abnormal ulnar nerve
Clinical prompt

“During a posterior approach for distal humerus ORIF, the ulnar nerve is thickened and scarred - likely from previous minor trauma or chronic cubital tunnel syndrome - but mobile. How do you manage it?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Posterior approach to the elbow - exam-day essentials

Key anatomy

  • Triceps: three heads (long, lateral, medial) converging on the olecranon - radial nerve, C7 to C8
  • Ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel between the medial epicondyle and olecranon - identify early
  • Anconeus: radial nerve, elevated with the triceps in the Bryan-Morrey sleeve
  • Not a true internervous plane - any split or detached triceps needs anatomic repair
  • Recurrent motor branch to FCU is the first ulnar branch - preserve during transposition

Approach variations

  • Triceps-splitting (Van Gorder): midline split, insertion preserved, about 5% extension lag
  • Triceps-reflecting (Bryan-Morrey): triceps-anconeus sleeve, best for TEA, 10% lag if the repair is poor
  • Olecranon osteotomy (chevron): apex distal at the trochlear notch, best articular view, delays rehab 6 weeks
  • Select by fracture complexity - osteotomy only for severe comminution

Positioning

  • Prone or lateral decubitus, arm over a bolster, elbow flexed 90 degrees
  • Tourniquet 250 to 300 mmHg, under 120 minutes, released for TEA cementing
  • Fluoroscopy from the contralateral side - confirm AP and lateral before draping

Ulnar nerve management

  • Identify first in the cubital tunnel before proceeding
  • Postoperative neuropathy around 25 to 30 percent (mostly transient); routine transposition not clearly protective (Oshika 2023)
  • Transpose selectively: TEA, nerve over hardware, or pre-existing cubital tunnel symptoms
  • Release arcade of Struthers, cubital tunnel retinaculum, Osborne ligament and FCU fascia
  • Document preop and postop nerve function

Triceps repair

  • Drill 3 to 4 transverse tunnels through the olecranon 5 mm apart
  • Heavy nonabsorbable suture (Ethibond #2 or FiberWire #5) through the tunnels
  • Repair at 30 degrees of flexion - not over-tight
  • Side-to-side closure of the borders restores contour
  • Poor repair means 10 to 15 percent strength loss and extension lag

Olecranon osteotomy

  • Chevron, apex distal at the trochlear notch - larger proximal fragment
  • Mark with a K-wire, confirm on lateral fluoroscopy
  • Fix with a tension band (two K-wires plus a figure-of-8) or a plate (more rigid, preferred)
  • Cost: 5 to 10 percent nonunion, up to 50 percent hardware removal, 6-week rehab delay

Complications

  • Ulnar neuropathy around 25 to 30 percent (permanent under 5%)
  • Extension lag 10 to 15 percent from a poor triceps repair
  • Osteotomy nonunion 5 to 10 percent - chevron plus plate lowers it
  • Elbow stiffness 30 to 50 percent - early motion and HO prophylaxis
  • Infection 2 to 5 percent - cefazolin 2 g IV within 60 minutes per AAOS, NICE and WHO

Rehabilitation

  • Soft-tissue approach: active-assisted ROM at 2 to 7 days, avoid resisted extension 6 weeks
  • Osteotomy: passive ROM for 3 weeks, active motion after union at 6 weeks
  • Goal: functional arc 30 to 130 degrees
  • Expected: 10 to 20 degree extension loss, 80 to 90 percent strength at 1 year

Guidelines, registries and global practice

  • Registries (NJR, AOANJRR, SHAR): linked cemented semiconstrained TEA dominates; revision higher for trauma than inflammatory indication
  • No mandated approach - osteotomy shows no functional advantage over triceps-sparing (Lu 2021)
  • Prophylaxis (AAOS, NICE, WHO): cefazolin 2 g IV within 60 minutes; vancomycin or clindamycin if beta-lactam allergy
  • HO prophylaxis: indomethacin 75 mg daily for up to 6 weeks, or single-dose radiotherapy 700 to 800 cGy

Exam pearls

  • Bryan-Morrey (1982) is the TEA standard - continuous triceps-anconeus sleeve
  • Split for simple fractures, reflect for TEA and complex, osteotomize only for severe comminution
  • Ulnar nerve transposition is selective, not routine (Oshika 2023)
  • In elderly unreconstructable fractures, TEA beats ORIF on MEPS (McKee RCT)

References


Guidelines, registries and global practice. TEA is a low-volume procedure worldwide. Arthroplasty registries (NJR for England and Wales, AOANJRR for Australia, SHAR and the Swedish and Norwegian registries) consistently report linked semiconstrained cemented implants as the dominant construct, with inflammatory arthritis, acute trauma and post-traumatic sequelae and primary osteoarthritis as the leading indications. Registry and cohort data agree that revision rates are substantially higher when TEA is done for trauma or post-traumatic indications than for inflammatory arthritis, and outcomes are worse in younger, higher-demand patients - a recurrent examiner point. There is no single mandated approach: AO Foundation teaching favours a triceps-sparing or olecranon-osteotomy exposure depending on comminution, while the Bryan-Morrey sleeve remains the standard for TEA. For antibiotic prophylaxis, AAOS, NICE/SIGN and WHO converge on a single preoperative dose of a first-generation cephalosporin (cefazolin 2 g IV) within 60 minutes of incision with redosing after roughly two half-lives, and vancomycin or clindamycin for confirmed beta-lactam allergy. Distal humeral fractures account for around 2 percent of adult fractures with a bimodal distribution, and validated outcome tools (Mayo Elbow Performance Score, QuickDASH) are used internationally for follow-up.

Evidence

Bryan-Morrey triceps-sparing posterior approach

Level IV
Bryan RS, Morrey BF • Clin Orthop Relat Res (1982)
Key Findings:
  • Original description of reflecting the extensor mechanism in continuity from medial to lateral with the forearm fascia, olecranon and ulnar periosteum
  • Series of 49 consecutive total elbow arthroplasties using the technique
  • No loss of triceps function and no significant extension weakness reported with anatomic reattachment
  • Also applied to intra-articular distal humeral fractures and rheumatoid synovectomy
  • The ulnar collateral ligament may be released for added exposure but must be securely reattached
Clinical implication: The triceps-sparing (Bryan-Morrey) approach became the workhorse exposure for TEA and complex fractures, but extension strength depends entirely on a secure anatomic reattachment of the extensor mechanism.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 7083671)
Evidence

Olecranon osteotomy vs triceps-sparing for intercondylar distal humeral fractures

Level III
Lu S, Zha YJ, Gong MQ, et al. • Chin Med J (Engl) (2021)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of 9 studies, 637 patients with intercondylar distal humeral fractures
  • No significant difference between olecranon osteotomy and triceps-sparing approaches in excellent or good elbow function (OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.69-2.75)
  • No significant difference in Mayo Elbow Performance Score, operative time, blood loss or overall complications
  • Sensitivity analysis suggested osteotomy may carry longer operative time, greater blood loss and more complications
  • Osteotomy adds a fracture to heal without a proven functional advantage in pooled data
Clinical implication: Olecranon osteotomy offers superior articular visualisation but no proven functional advantage over a triceps-sparing exposure; reserve it for severe articular comminution where direct visualisation is essential.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 33617182)
Evidence

Ulnar neuropathy and the role of transposition after distal humeral ORIF

Level IV
Oshika Y, Takegami Y, Tokutake K, et al. • J Hand Surg Am (2023)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective analysis of 116 patients after ORIF of intra-articular distal humeral fractures
  • Persistent ulnar neuropathy in 34 patients (29.3%) at final follow-up (mostly modified McGowan grade 1)
  • Anterior transposition was NOT independently associated with reduced neuropathy (OR 1.91, 95% CI 0.81-4.56)
  • Olecranon osteotomy was the only independent protective factor (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.12-0.73)
  • Challenges the assumption that routine transposition prevents postoperative ulnar nerve dysfunction
Clinical implication: Postoperative ulnar neuropathy is common (around 25-30%) and routine anterior transposition is not clearly protective; meticulous nerve handling and individualised decision-making matter more than reflexive transposition.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 36932009)
Evidence

TEA vs ORIF for comminuted distal humeral fractures in the elderly (RCT)

Level I
McKee MD, Veillette CJH, Hall JA, et al. • J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2009)
Key Findings:
  • Multicentre RCT, 42 patients aged over 65 with displaced intra-articular (OTA type 13C) distal humeral fractures
  • 5 of 21 (24%) randomised to ORIF were converted intraoperatively to TEA due to unreconstructable comminution
  • TEA gave significantly better Mayo Elbow Performance Scores at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
  • Reoperation rates not statistically different (TEA 12% vs ORIF 27%)
  • Operative time averaged 32 minutes shorter with TEA
Clinical implication: In elderly patients with unreconstructable intra-articular distal humeral fractures, primary semiconstrained TEA via the posterior approach yields more predictable function than ORIF - but always have an arthroplasty fallback available when planning fixation.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 18823799)
Evidence

Cochrane review: surgical interventions for distal humeral fractures

Level I
Wang Y, Zhuo Q, Tang P, Yang W • Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2013)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of 3 small RCTs (109 patients, OTA type C fractures)
  • TEA gave consistently better MEPS than ORIF in elderly patients in the included trial
  • Perpendicular versus parallel double-plate fixation showed no significant difference in MEPS, complications or range of motion
  • Anterior subfascial transposition versus in-situ decompression of the ulnar nerve showed no statistically significant difference in recovery
  • Overall evidence base judged limited; large multicentre RCTs of modern locking plates needed
Clinical implication: High-quality comparative evidence remains sparse; parallel and perpendicular plating are both acceptable, and ulnar nerve management should be individualised rather than dictated by a single protocol.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 23440844)
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
25 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
25 min
Updated
2026-06-20
PROCEDURES USING THIS APPROACH
ORIF OlecranonTriceps Tendon RepairDistal Humerus ORIFORIF Distal Humerus Fracture - Olecranon Osteotomy ApproachTotal Elbow Replacement
Browse all procedures