Comprehensive guide to the posterolateral approach to the knee for LCL reconstruction, posterolateral corner repair, and fibular head procedures
Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team
Orthopaedic clinicians and medical editors • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team
CPN at Fibular Neck | LCL + Popliteus + PFL Reconstruction | PLC Complex Repair
The posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee is a complex anatomic region consisting of static (ligaments) and dynamic (musculotendinous) stabilizers that resist varus and external rotation forces. Understanding PLC anatomy is CRITICAL for successful reconstruction and avoiding common peroneal nerve injury.
1. LATERAL COLLATERAL LIGAMENT (LCL - PRIMARY VARUS RESTRAINT):
Anatomy:
Biomechanics:
2. POPLITEUS TENDON (PRIMARY EXTERNAL ROTATION RESTRAINT):
Anatomy:
Clinical Significance:
3. POPLITEOFIBULAR LIGAMENT (SECONDARY EXTERNAL ROTATION RESTRAINT):
Anatomy:
Biomechanics:
4. ARCUATE LIGAMENT COMPLEX:
Anatomy:
Function:
1. BICEPS FEMORIS:
Anatomy:
Clinical Significance:
2. ILIOTIBIAL BAND (ITB):
Anatomy:
Function:
3. LATERAL HEAD OF GASTROCNEMIUS:
Anatomy:
Function:
COMMON PERONEAL NERVE (PRIMARY HAZARD):
Course:
Branches:
Injury Manifestations:
Protection Strategy:
POPLITEAL VESSELS:
Most vulnerable structure: The CPN is the SINGLE MOST VULNERABLE structure during posterolateral approach (2-10% iatrogenic injury rate - LaPrade 2008)
Anatomy - why high risk:
Surgical protection strategy:
Identify CPN FIRST before ANY dissection around fibular head
Skin incision POSTERIOR to fibular head
Dissect along POSTERIOR border of biceps femoris
Use BLUNT dissection only at fibular neck
Retract nerve ANTERIORLY during fibular head work
NEVER drill blind into fibular head
Clinical pearl - difficult cases:
CPN injury presentation:
Anatomy: Popliteal artery and vein lie 15-20mm MEDIAL to fibular head in popliteal fossa
Safe zone principle: Stay LATERAL to interval between biceps femoris (lateral) and semimembranosus/semitendinosus (medial)
Danger zone: MEDIAL popliteal fossa
Surgical strategy:
Vascular injury recognition:
Management if suspected vascular injury:
Prevention:
Setup:
Skin Incision:
Landmarks:
Superficial Dissection:
STEP 1: PALPATE COMMON PERONEAL NERVE (Before Deep Dissection):
STEP 2: EXPOSE COMMON PERONEAL NERVE:
STEP 3: RETRACT NERVE ANTERIORLY:
After Nerve Protected:
1. Expose Fibular Head:
2. Identify LCL:
3. Expose Popliteus Tendon:
4. Identify Popliteofibular Ligament:
ANATOMIC PLC RECONSTRUCTION (LaPrade Technique - GOLD STANDARD):
Indications:
Graft Options:
Technique (LaPrade Anatomic Reconstruction):
LCL Reconstruction:
Popliteofibular Ligament Reconstruction:
Popliteus Tendon Reconstruction (If Needed):
Post-Operative Protocol:
PLC RECONSTRUCTION (PRIMARY INDICATION):
Grade III PLC Injury (Operative Indication):
Combined Ligament Injuries (60-80% of PLC Injuries):
Grade I-II PLC Injuries (Non-Operative):
FIBULAR HEAD FRACTURES:
Avulsion Fractures (LCL/Biceps Insertion):
Comminuted Fibular Head Fractures:
COMMON PERONEAL NERVE EXPLORATION:
Indications:
Exploration Findings:
Outcomes:
Anatomic PLC Reconstruction (LaPrade Technique):
Combined ACL + PLC Reconstruction:
Non-Anatomic PLC Reconstruction (Historical):
Fibular Head Fracture ORIF:
| factor | anatomic | nonAnatomic | preferred |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structures Reconstructed | LCL (femoral epicondyle to fibular head) + Popliteofibular ligament (popliteus to fibular styloid) - TWO structures (LaPrade technique) | LCL ONLY (single-structure reconstruction) OR biceps tenodesis (reroute biceps posteriorly) - ONE structure | Anatomic (reproduces native PLC anatomy - LaPrade 2014) |
| Biomechanical Restoration | Restores BOTH varus stability (LCL) AND external rotation stability (popliteofibular ligament) - complete PLC function | Restores varus stability (LCL) but INCOMPLETE external rotation restraint (dial test remains positive 10-15° asymmetry) | Anatomic (restores both varus AND rotatory stability - Gollehon 1987) |
| Graft Failure Rate | 12% (7/58 patients) at 2-year follow-up (LaPrade 2014) | 30-40% failure rate (historical series) - inadequate rotatory control leads to graft stretching/failure | Anatomic (2.5-3× lower failure rate) |
| Clinical Outcomes | Lysholm 88, IKDC 78% normal/nearly normal, dial test asymmetry 3° (near-normal - LaPrade 2014) | Lysholm 65-75, IKDC 50-60% normal, dial test asymmetry 10-15° (persistent rotatory laxity) | Anatomic (superior functional outcomes) |
| Surgical Complexity | MORE COMPLEX: Requires 3 bone tunnels (femoral LCL, femoral popliteus, fibular head), 2 graft limbs (LCL, popliteofibular), longer surgery time (180-210 minutes) | LESS COMPLEX: Single tunnel (femoral LCL to fibular head) OR biceps rerouting without tunnels, shorter surgery time (90-120 minutes) | Depends on surgeon experience (anatomic requires advanced skills) |
| Peroneal Nerve Injury Risk | 5% transient peroneal nerve palsy (LaPrade 2014) - from fibular head drilling and nerve retraction | 2-3% nerve injury - less dissection around fibular head (BUT inadequate reconstruction leads to higher failure) | Similar nerve injury risk (both require careful nerve protection) |
| Indication | GOLD STANDARD for Grade III PLC injuries (varus greater than 10mm, dial test greater than 10°), combined ACL/PCL + PLC injuries | HISTORICAL technique (no longer recommended) - replaced by anatomic reconstruction in modern practice | Anatomic (current standard of care - LaPrade 2014) |
| Return to Sport | 72% return to pre-injury sport level (LaPrade 2014) - higher with isolated PLC (85%), lower with multiligament (60%) | 40-50% return to pre-injury level - persistent rotatory instability limits pivoting sports | Anatomic (higher return-to-sport rate) |
1. COMMON PERONEAL NERVE INJURY (2-10% - MOST COMMON):
Mechanism:
Prevention:
Recognition:
Immediate Management:
Post-Operative Management:
Outcome:
2. POPLITEAL VESSEL INJURY (Less than 1%):
Mechanism:
Prevention:
Recognition:
Management:
Outcome:
1. GRAFT FAILURE (12% Anatomic PLC, 32% Staged ACL+PLC):
Risk Factors:
Diagnosis:
Management:
Outcome:
2. PERSISTENT ROTATORY INSTABILITY (10-15%):
Mechanism:
Clinical Manifestation:
Management:
Outcome:
3. STIFFNESS (5-10%):
Mechanism:
Clinical Manifestation:
Prevention:
Management:
Outcome:
"A 28-year-old rugby player sustains a varus hyperextension injury to his left knee. Clinical examination shows varus laxity of 12mm at 30° flexion (vs 2mm contralateral), positive dial test with 15° external rotation asymmetry at 30° flexion, and negative Lachman/posterior drawer. MRI confirms LCL and popliteofibular ligament tears. What grade is this PLC injury? What are the indications for operative vs non-operative management? How would you manage this patient?"
"A 32-year-old female sustains a varus hyperextension injury playing netball. Examination shows positive Lachman (10mm), positive dial test at 30° (12° asymmetry), and varus laxity 10mm at 30° flexion. MRI confirms ACL tear + LCL tear + popliteofibular ligament tear. How would you manage this injury? Should you reconstruct ACL and PLC simultaneously or staged? What does the evidence show?"
"You are performing posterolateral corner reconstruction via posterolateral approach. After drilling the fibular head tunnel for LCL reconstruction, the patient (under regional anesthesia with incomplete motor block) develops foot drop intraoperatively. What is the likely diagnosis? How do you manage this complication? What is the expected outcome?"
High-Yield Exam Summary