Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • For Training Programs
  • Authors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Methodology
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Back to Operative Surgery
Trauma

Modified Stoppa Approach to the Acetabulum

Comprehensive guide to the modified Stoppa approach for quadrilateral surface and medial acetabular wall fractures - surgical anatomy, technique, and exam preparation

Core Procedure
advanced
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Orthopaedic clinicians and medical editors • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Editorial boardMethodologyReview policyReport a correction
High Yield Overview

MODIFIED STOPPA - INTRAPELVIC QUADRILATERAL ACCESS

Midline Approach | Quadrilateral Surface | Suprapubic Window

MidlinePfannenstiel or low midline incision
QuadrilateralOptimal access to medial wall
Space of RetziusRetropubic dissection plane
Less than 5%Nerve injury risk (vs 10-15% ilioinguinal)

KEY ANATOMICAL SPACES

Space of Retzius
PatternRetropubic space between bladder and pubis
TreatmentDevelop first for access
First Window
PatternLateral to bladder, medial to vessels
TreatmentAccess quadrilateral surface
Second Window
PatternLateral to vessels (optional)
TreatmentExtended exposure if needed

Critical Must-Knows

  • Intrapelvic approach - works inside the pelvis through space of Retzius
  • Superior access to quadrilateral surface - better than ilioinguinal medial window
  • Bladder mobilization is key step - mobilize posterolaterally to expose bone
  • Corona mortis encountered and ligated - just as in ilioinguinal medial window
  • Cannot access iliac wing or high anterior column - limited to medial structures

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Indications: quadrilateral surface, medial wall, T-type fractures, associated both-column
  • "
    Pfannenstiel or low midline incision - cosmetically superior to ilioinguinal
  • "
    Combines well with lateral window of ilioinguinal or separate lateral incision
  • "
    Increasingly preferred over ilioinguinal for isolated medial wall pathology

Critical Modified Stoppa Approach Exam Points

Space of Retzius

Retropubic space between bladder anteriorly and pubic symphysis posteriorly. This avascular plane is the key to the approach - develop it bluntly to access the medial pelvic wall without entering peritoneum or damaging bladder.

Quadrilateral Surface Access

The modified Stoppa provides superior access to quadrilateral surface compared to ilioinguinal medial window. Direct visualization allows placement of buttress plates to prevent medial subluxation of femoral head.

Bladder Mobilization

Mobilize bladder posterolaterally off the quadrilateral surface. This is the key maneuver - gentle blunt dissection in correct plane. Foley catheter essential to decompress bladder and reduce injury risk.

Corona Mortis Again

Just as in ilioinguinal approach, corona mortis is encountered crossing superior pubic ramus. Must identify and ligate before proceeding laterally. Same 10-30% incidence and hemorrhage risk.

Modified Stoppa vs Ilioinguinal - Decision Making

Fracture LocationBest ApproachRationaleAlternative
Quadrilateral surface aloneModified StoppaDirect visualization, better plate placementIlioinguinal medial window (inferior access)
Anterior column (high)IlioinguinalNeed lateral and middle windowsCannot access with Stoppa alone
Anterior column (low) + quadrilateralCombined: Stoppa + lateral ilioinguinalStoppa for quadrilateral, lateral window for columnFull ilioinguinal but less quadrilateral access
Both-column with medial displacementStoppa + Kocher-LangenbeckStoppa for anterior, K-L for posteriorIlioinguinal + K-L (traditional)
Mnemonic

STOPPASTOPPA - Key Steps of Approach

S
Space of Retzius
Develop retropubic space bluntly
T
Take down bladder
Mobilize bladder posterolaterally
O
Obturator identification
Identify obturator neurovascular bundle
P
Pubis exposure
Expose superior pubic ramus and quadrilateral
P
Plate quadrilateral
Apply buttress plate to prevent subluxation
A
Avoid bladder injury
Foley catheter, gentle dissection, correct plane

Memory Hook:STOPPA reminds you of the systematic steps to safely access the quadrilateral surface intrapelvically

Mnemonic

RETZIUSRETZIUS - Anatomical Boundaries

R
Retropubic location
Behind pubic symphysis
E
Extraperitoneal
Stay outside peritoneum
T
Transversalis fascia
Posterior boundary of space
Z
Zone of bladder
Bladder is anterior wall
I
Iliac vessels lateral
Lateral boundary of first window
U
Urogenital structures
Bladder, prostate/uterus to mobilize
S
Symphysis pubis
Floor of the space

Memory Hook:RETZIUS describes the space of Retzius anatomy - the key surgical corridor for modified Stoppa

Mnemonic

CORONACORONA - Vascular Management (Same as Ilioinguinal)

C
Crossing superior ramus
Aberrant vessel crosses bone
O
Obturator connection
Connects obturator to external iliac
R
Ramus pubis superior
Location of crossing
O
Often large caliber
Can be 2-3mm or larger
N
Needs early ligation
Ligate before lateral dissection
A
Arterial OR venous
Can be artery, vein, or both

Memory Hook:CORONA mortis is the 'crown of death' - must ligate it in both Stoppa and ilioinguinal approaches

Overview and Historical Context

The modified Stoppa approach was adapted from the Stoppa hernia repair technique and popularized for acetabular fractures by Cole and Bolhofner in the 1990s. It provides intrapelvic access to the quadrilateral surface and medial acetabular structures.

Historical evolution:

  • Original Stoppa: Developed for inguinal hernia repair using retropubic space
  • Cole and Bolhofner (1994): Applied to acetabular fracture surgery
  • Sagi et al (2000s): Refined technique and indications
  • Current: Increasingly preferred for quadrilateral surface access

Why it gained popularity:

  • Superior quadrilateral surface visualization vs ilioinguinal medial window
  • Lower nerve injury risk (no lateral femoral cutaneous nerve at risk)
  • Better cosmetic result (Pfannenstiel incision)
  • Combines well with other approaches

Stoppa vs Ilioinguinal for Quadrilateral

The modified Stoppa approach provides superior access to the quadrilateral surface compared to the medial window of the ilioinguinal approach. Working intrapelvically allows direct visualization and plate application to prevent medial subluxation. However, Stoppa cannot access the iliac wing or high anterior column - these still require ilioinguinal lateral/middle windows.

Current indications:

  • Isolated quadrilateral surface fractures
  • Associated both-column fractures (with medial displacement)
  • T-type fractures (anterior component)
  • Low anterior column with quadrilateral involvement
  • Often combined with lateral window ilioinguinal or separate lateral incision

Anatomy - Space of Retzius

The space of Retzius is the key anatomical space - a potential extraperitoneal space between the bladder and the posterior surface of the pubic symphysis.

Boundaries of space of Retzius:

  • Anterior: Posterior surface of pubic symphysis and superior rami
  • Posterior: Anterior wall of bladder and peritoneum
  • Superior: Peritoneal reflection
  • Inferior: Pelvic floor (levator ani, obturator internus)
  • Lateral: Pelvic sidewall and external iliac vessels

Anatomical Structures and Relationships

StructureLocationRelationship to ApproachClinical Significance
BladderPosterior to pubisMust mobilize posterolaterallyInjury risk if not in correct plane - use Foley
PeritoneumCovers bladder domeStay below peritoneal reflectionEntry causes bowel complications - repair if entered
External iliac vesselsLateral pelvic sidewallLateral boundary of first windowRetract laterally for extended exposure
Obturator neurovascular bundleObturator foramenOn obturator internusIdentify and protect during dissection
Corona mortisSuperior pubic ramusEncountered during lateral dissection10-30% incidence - ligate before proceeding

Quadrilateral surface anatomy:

  • Location: Medial wall of acetabulum, inner table of pelvis
  • Shape: Quadrilateral (four sides) - superior border is pelvic brim, inferior is obturator foramen, anterior is superior ramus, posterior is ischium
  • Function: Resists medial subluxation of femoral head
  • Fracture significance: Fractures allow medial displacement of head into pelvis

Bladder Safety in Space of Retzius

The bladder must be mobilized in the correct plane to prevent injury. Always place a Foley catheter to decompress the bladder before dissection. The correct plane is between bladder wall and pelvic bone - this is relatively avascular. If you see muscle fibers (detrusor), you're in the bladder wall. If you see peritoneum, you're too superficial. Use gentle blunt dissection with a sponge stick.

Window anatomy:

WindowBoundariesExposesFixation
First Window (Medial)Bladder (medial) and external iliac vessels (lateral)Quadrilateral surface, superior ramusQuadrilateral buttress plate
Second Window (Lateral)External iliac vessels (medial) and psoas (lateral)Low anterior column, pelvic brimInfrapectineal plate if needed

Internervous Plane

No true internervous plane exists for this approach.

The modified Stoppa approach works through the Space of Retzius (retropubic space), which is an extraperitoneal potential space. The dissection essentially separates the rectus abdominis muscles (inter-muscular) but then proceeds in a plane that is defined by fascial boundaries rather than nerve supplies.

Nervous Anatomy Distinction

Unlike the ilioinguinal approach which works between nerve territories (femoral/gluteal/lateral femoral cutaneous), the Stoppa approach is an intrapelvic, extraperitoneal approach. It avoids major traversing nerves of the anterior thigh. The obturator nerve is the only major nerve at risk, located on the pelvic sidewall on the obturator internus muscle.

Indications and Fracture Patterns

Isolated quadrilateral surface fractures:

  • Medial wall displaced
  • Risk of femoral head subluxation into pelvis
  • Best access for buttress plate application

Associated both-column fractures:

  • Medial displacement of articular surface
  • Spur sign present
  • Often combined with Kocher-Langenbeck for posterior component

T-type fractures:

  • Anterior component (stem of T) involves quadrilateral
  • Combined with posterior approach for transverse component

Low anterior column with quadrilateral involvement:

  • Inferior extent of anterior column
  • May combine with lateral window ilioinguinal for superior column

The Stoppa approach is specifically designed for medial structures and excels where ilioinguinal medial window is limited.

Stoppa + Lateral Window Ilioinguinal:

  • Low anterior column + quadrilateral
  • Stoppa for medial, lateral window for iliac wing
  • Single patient position (supine)

Stoppa + Kocher-Langenbeck:

  • Both-column with medial displacement
  • Associated both-column patterns
  • T-type fractures
  • Requires repositioning or two-team approach

Stoppa + Percutaneous Screw:

  • Quadrilateral + posterior column without wall
  • Stoppa for anterior, screw for posterior
  • Minimizes surgical trauma

The modified Stoppa is rarely used in isolation - it typically combines with other techniques for complete fracture management.

Absolute contraindications:

  • Previous lower midline laparotomy with extensive adhesions
  • Active pelvic infection
  • Bladder injury requiring repair (relative - may still be possible)

Relative contraindications:

  • Previous pelvic surgery (increases difficulty)
  • Extensive scarring in retropubic space
  • Pregnancy (relative - can be done but carefully)

When NOT to use Stoppa:

  • High anterior column fractures (no access to iliac wing)
  • Anterior wall without quadrilateral involvement (ilioinguinal better)
  • SI joint pathology (need ilioinguinal lateral window)

Understanding the limitations of the Stoppa approach is as important as knowing its strengths.

Preoperative Planning

Imaging assessment:

  • CT scan with 3D reconstruction: Essential for understanding fracture pattern
  • Assess quadrilateral displacement and rotation
  • Measure gap (if greater than 10mm, strongly consider fixation)
  • Identify associated fracture components

Fracture characteristics to document:

  • Quadrilateral fragment size and displacement
  • Posterior column involvement
  • Femoral head position (centrally located vs subluxed medially)
  • Marginal impaction
  • Intra-articular loose bodies

Implant planning:

  • Quadrilateral buttress plates (pre-contoured or standard reconstruction plates)
  • 3.5mm cortical screws (various lengths 40-80mm)
  • Infrapectineal plating if anterior column involved
  • May need spring plates for specific patterns

Patient preparation:

  • Foley catheter (essential - placed before prep)
  • Bowel preparation if peritoneal entry anticipated
  • DVT prophylaxis (SCDs, chemical prophylaxis post-op)
  • Antibiotics (cefazolin 2g or equivalent)

Quadrilateral Plate Biomechanics

The quadrilateral buttress plate acts as an internal buttress preventing medial subluxation of the femoral head. It spans from the superior pubic ramus anteriorly to the ischium posteriorly, creating a shelf that resists medial displacement. Screw fixation into intact bone (ramus and ischium) provides stability. This is biomechanically superior to trying to reduce and fix the quadrilateral fragment itself.

Positioning

Standard Position:

  • Supine on a radiolucent table (essential for fluoroscopy)
  • Arms can be tucked or on boards (tucked preferred to allow surgeon movement)
  • Bump under the ipsilateral hip is usually NOT recommended as it makes the quadrilateral surface more vertical and harder to visualize. A flat pelvis is preferred.
  • Draping: Wide preparation from nipples to knees. Foley catheter access is essential.

Setup Checklist:

  1. Foley Catheter: MANDATORY. Must be placed before draping to decompress bladder.
  2. Fluoroscopy: Ensure C-arm can swing for Inlet, Outlet, and Judet views without table obstruction.
  3. Surgeon Position: Surgeon stands on the CONTRA-lateral side to look across the pelvis at the fracture.
  4. Assistant Position: Assistant stands on the IPSI-lateral side to retract the bladder.

Classification

Intrapelvic Approach Classification

Stoppa Approach Variants

VariantIncisionExposureBest For
Classical StoppaPfannenstiel (transverse)Medial only (first window)Isolated quadrilateral surface
Modified StoppaPfannenstiel or low midlineMedial with optional second windowQuadrilateral + low anterior column
Extended StoppaExtended midline or lateral extensionMedial + lateral ilioinguinal windowsComplex anterior fractures
Anterior Intrapelvic (Keel)Single ilioinguinal-typeCombined medial and lateral accessAssociated both-column fractures

Surgical Window Classification

WindowBoundariesAccessFixation Options
First WindowBladder (medial), external iliac vessels (lateral)Quadrilateral surface, superior ramusQuadrilateral buttress plate
Second WindowExternal iliac vessels (medial), psoas (lateral)Pelvic brim, low anterior columnInfrapectineal plating

Judet-Letournel Fractures Suited to Stoppa

Fracture Patterns and Approach Selection

Fracture PatternStoppa RoleCombined ApproachRationale
Anterior column (low)Primary approachStoppa alone or + lateral windowDirect quadrilateral access
Anterior column (high)Cannot use StoppaIlioinguinal requiredNo access to iliac wing
T-typeAnterior componentStoppa + Kocher-LangenbeckStoppa for stem, K-L for transverse
Associated both-columnAnterior fixationStoppa + K-LExcellent medial buttress access
Transverse + posterior wallRarely indicatedKocher-Langenbeck preferredPosterior approach addresses both

Approach Selection Pearl

The modified Stoppa is NOT a replacement for ilioinguinal - it is an alternative for specific fracture patterns involving the quadrilateral surface. High anterior column and iliac wing fractures still require ilioinguinal lateral and middle windows.

Clinical Assessment

Preoperative Patient Assessment

General Assessment:

  • Hemodynamic status: Ensure stable before definitive fixation
  • Associated injuries: Polytrauma common with acetabular fractures
  • Urological status: Rule out bladder or urethral injury (blood at meatus, high-riding prostate)
  • Neurological exam: Document sciatic nerve function pre-operatively

Acetabular-Specific Assessment:

  • Soft tissue envelope: Morel-Lavallée lesion over greater trochanter (posterior injury)
  • Hip stability: Assess for femoral head dislocation (requires urgent reduction)
  • Timing: Most acetabular fractures repaired at 3-7 days (allows resuscitation, decreases bleeding)

Physical Examination for Approach Selection

FindingSignificanceApproach Implication
Anterior abdominal scarsPrevious surgeryMay preclude Stoppa if extensive adhesions
Midline laparotomy scarPrior peritoneal entryIncreased difficulty in Stoppa
Pfannenstiel scarPrevious C-section/herniaUsually still allows Stoppa
Groin mass/herniaMay need concurrent repairStoppa allows hernia inspection

Contraindication Assessment

Stoppa Contraindication Evaluation

FactorAssessmentIf PresentAlternative
Previous midline laparotomyReview operative notes, CT for adhesionsRelative contraindicationConsider ilioinguinal approach
Active pelvic infectionBlood cultures, WCC, CRPAbsolute contraindicationDelay until infection cleared
Bladder injury (confirmed)Cystogram or CT cystographyRelative contraindicationMay proceed if injury minor and repaired
High anterior column fractureCT 3D reconstructionStoppa insufficientIlioinguinal required for complete access

Bladder Injury Workup

If blood at urethral meatus or gross hematuria, obtain retrograde urethrogram (if urethral injury suspected) and CT cystogram before surgery. Known bladder injury is not an absolute contraindication but requires urology consultation and careful surgical planning.

Investigations

Imaging Protocol for Approach Planning

Standard Radiographs:

  • AP Pelvis: Assess overall alignment, femoral head position
  • Judet Views (obturator and iliac obliques): Define column involvement
  • Inlet/Outlet views: Assess pelvic ring if associated injury

CT Scan (Essential):

  • Axial images: Quadrilateral surface displacement, articular step-off
  • Coronal reformats: Column involvement height assessment
  • Sagittal reformats: Dome involvement, impaction
  • 3D reconstructions: Fracture pattern visualization, surgical planning

Key Imaging Findings Favoring Stoppa

CT FindingMeasurementStoppa Indication
Quadrilateral displacementGreater than 10mm medialStrong indication
Femoral head subluxationMedial migration visibleRequires buttress plate
Low anterior columnFracture below iliopectineal eminenceAccessible via Stoppa
High anterior columnFracture extends to iliac crestStoppa insufficient - need ilioinguinal

Advanced CT Analysis

CT-Based Approach Decision Making

CT FeatureStoppa AloneStoppa + Lateral WindowFull Ilioinguinal
Isolated quadrilateralYesNoAlternative option
Low anterior column + quadrilateralYes (if minimal column)Yes (if significant column)Alternative option
High anterior columnNo - insufficient accessNo - insufficient accessRequired
SI joint involvementNo - cannot accessNo - cannot accessLateral window needed

Marginal Impaction Assessment:

  • Look for fragments pushed into metaphysis
  • May require bone grafting after reduction
  • Plan approach to directly visualize impacted area

Intra-articular Fragment Assessment:

  • Loose bodies require extraction
  • May influence approach selection (need direct articular visualization)

CT Planning Pearl

On axial CT, trace the iliopectineal line (anterior column) and ilioischial line (posterior column). If the iliopectineal line fracture is below the pelvic brim level, Stoppa can access it. If the fracture extends above the brim toward the iliac crest, ilioinguinal lateral window is required.

Management

Approach Selection Algorithm

Fracture Pattern to Approach Matching

Fracture PatternPrimary ApproachAdditional ApproachKey Consideration
Isolated quadrilateral surfaceModified StoppaNone usually neededDirect buttress plate application
Low anterior columnModified StoppaLateral window if extensiveAssess column height on CT
High anterior columnIlioinguinalNot StoppaStoppa cannot reach iliac wing
Associated both-columnStoppa + K-LTwo approaches requiredStoppa for anterior, K-L for posterior
T-type fractureStoppa + K-LTwo approaches requiredStoppa for stem, K-L for transverse

Timing of Surgery

  • Emergent (less than 24h): Only if femoral head irreducible dislocation
  • Early (3-5 days): Preferred timing - allows resuscitation, reduces bleeding
  • Delayed (5-14 days): Still acceptable outcomes
  • Late (greater than 21 days): Increased difficulty, may need extensile approaches

Combined Approach Strategy

Stoppa + Kocher-Langenbeck (Most Common Combination):

  • Positioning options:
    • Sequential: Supine for Stoppa, then lateral for K-L
    • Two-team: Lateral position with anterior surgeon reaching across
    • Floating: Modified lateral allows both approaches

Stoppa + Lateral Ilioinguinal Window:

  • Single supine position
  • Can use combined incision or separate incisions
  • Indicated for low anterior column extending beyond quadrilateral

Surgical Timing and Positioning

When combining Stoppa with Kocher-Langenbeck, consider operative time carefully. Prolonged prone or lateral positioning increases DVT risk. Many surgeons prefer staged procedures 5-7 days apart for complex fractures to reduce physiological stress.

Implant Selection

Plate TypeApplicationScrew Direction
Quadrilateral buttressMedial wall supportRamus (anterior), ischium (posterior)
Infrapectineal plateLow anterior columnAlong pelvic brim
Spring plateMarginal impaction supportVariable based on fragment
Reconstruction plateContouring for complex patternsMultiple directions

Surgical Technique

Skin Incision Options

Pfannenstiel incision (preferred):

  • Transverse suprapubic incision 2-3cm above pubic symphysis
  • Length 10-15cm
  • Better cosmetic result
  • Familiar to general surgeons and gynecologists

Low midline incision (alternative):

  • Vertical midline from umbilicus toward symphysis
  • Better extensibility if needed
  • Higher wound complication rate

Pfannenstiel vs Midline

Most surgeons prefer the Pfannenstiel incision for modified Stoppa - it provides adequate exposure with better cosmetic results and lower wound complication rates. The low midline incision is reserved for cases requiring extensile exposure or when Pfannenstiel is contraindicated (previous incision, extensive scarring).

The incision choice depends on fracture pattern, patient factors, and surgeon preference.

Developing the Space of Retzius

Retropubic Space Development

Step 1Anterior Rectus Sheath

Incise anterior rectus sheath transversely (Pfannenstiel) or vertically (midline) Identify rectus abdominis muscles Separate muscles in midline (linea alba for midline; retract laterally for Pfannenstiel)

Step 2Enter Space

Identify transversalis fascia Gently dissect down to pubic symphysis Feel bladder dome (soft, mobile with Foley catheter balloon palpable) Begin blunt dissection between bladder and symphysis

Step 3Develop Space Bluntly

Use sponge stick or finger dissection Sweep bladder posteriorly and laterally off pubis Develop space laterally to pelvic sidewall Identify superior pubic ramus bilaterally

Step 4Confirm Landmarks

Palpate pubic symphysis (anterior) Identify superior rami bilaterally Confirm you are extraperitoneal (no bowel visible) Place retractors to hold space open

Correct Plane in Space of Retzius

The correct plane is between bladder wall and bone - this is relatively avascular. If you encounter significant bleeding, you may be in bladder wall or have entered vessels. If you see glistening peritoneum, you're too superficial. If you see detrusor muscle, you're in bladder wall. The correct plane is loose areolar tissue that sweeps easily with blunt dissection.

Development of space of Retzius is the foundational step - all subsequent exposure depends on this.

First Window - Quadrilateral Surface Exposure

Boundaries:

  • Medial: Mobilized bladder
  • Lateral: External iliac vessels

First Window Development

Step 1Bladder Mobilization

Continue blunt dissection posterolaterally Mobilize bladder off quadrilateral surface Work toward obturator foramen Retract bladder medially with broad retractor

Step 2Identify Vessels

Identify external iliac artery and vein on pelvic sidewall These are lateral boundary of first window Do not need to mobilize for first window access

Step 3Corona Mortis

Approach superior pubic ramus carefully Identify any vessels crossing ramus (corona mortis) Clip or ligate with ties (2-0 silk) Confirm hemostasis before proceeding

Step 4Expose Bone

Complete subperiosteal dissection along quadrilateral surface Identify fracture lines Expose superior ramus anteriorly Expose ischium posteriorly for plate application

The first window provides complete quadrilateral surface exposure for fracture reduction and buttress plate application.

Fracture Reduction and Plate Application

Reduction maneuvers:

  • Pelvic clamp: Compress fracture if displaced laterally
  • Ball-spike pusher: Push displaced quadrilateral fragment laterally
  • Pointed reduction forceps: Hold reduction temporarily
  • Assess with fluoroscopy: Inlet view shows quadrilateral reduction

Quadrilateral buttress plate application:

Plate Fixation Technique

Step 1Plate Selection

Pre-contoured quadrilateral plate (if available) OR 3.5mm reconstruction plate contoured to shape Plate spans from superior ramus (anteriorly) to ischium (posteriorly)

Step 2Plate Position

Place plate on quadrilateral surface (inner pelvic wall) Anterior screws into superior pubic ramus Posterior screws into ischium or retroacetabular surface Central screws may be left empty (act as buttress)

Step 3Screw Fixation

Drill and measure carefully 3.5mm cortical screws, typically 40-60mm length Avoid intra-articular penetration (check fluoroscopy) Obturator oblique view shows retroacetabular safe zone

Step 4Final Assessment

Fluoroscopy: AP, obturator oblique, inlet views Confirm plate position and screw lengths Assess reduction of quadrilateral surface Check for intra-articular hardware

Screw Direction for Quadrilateral Plate

Posterior screws from quadrilateral plate can be directed into the ischium or into the retroacetabular safe zone (between sciatic notches). The obturator oblique view shows this zone well. Screws must avoid the hip joint - aim posteriorly and inferiorly, not laterally into acetabulum.

Adequate fixation resists medial subluxation of the femoral head and provides stability for healing.

Wound Closure

Hemostasis:

  • Meticulous - large dead space in retropubic region
  • Check for bladder injury (fill with methylene blue if suspicious)
  • Ensure corona mortis ligated

Layers:

  • Posterior rectus sheath (if entered) - 0 or 1 absorbable continuous
  • Anterior rectus sheath - 0 or 1 absorbable continuous
  • Scarpa's fascia - 2-0 absorbable interrupted
  • Skin - staples or subcuticular suture

Drain:

  • Retropubic drain (10mm flat or 15Fr round)
  • Exit through separate stab incision
  • Remove at 24-48h when output less than 30mL/day

Post-closure:

  • Check Foley catheter still draining (ensure not kinked or clamped)
  • Final fluoroscopy (AP, obturator, inlet)
  • Document neurovascular status

Closure completes the procedure with attention to hemostasis and bladder integrity.

Complications

Complications of Modified Stoppa Approach

ComplicationIncidencePrevention/Management
Bladder injury1-3%Foley catheter, correct plane dissection; repair primarily if injured, consult urology
Peritoneal entry5-10%Stay below peritoneal reflection; repair if entered, no long-term consequence
External iliac vessel injuryLess than 1%Gentle dissection if mobilizing for second window; have vascular backup
Corona mortis hemorrhage10-30% encounter itIdentify and ligate early; control with clips or ties if bleeding
Heterotopic ossification10-20%Indomethacin 75mg daily x 6 weeks or single-dose radiation
Wound infection2-5%Prophylactic antibiotics, minimize dead space, drain placement
Obturator nerve injuryRare (less than 1%)Identify and protect nerve during dissection

Bladder injury management:

  • Recognize intraoperatively (if possible) - methylene blue test
  • Primary two-layer repair (3-0 absorbable suture)
  • Foley catheter for 7-10 days
  • Cystogram before catheter removal
  • Urology consultation if complex

Vascular injury management:

  • Direct pressure for control
  • Vascular surgery consultation
  • Primary repair for small injuries
  • Graft if extensive injury

Nerve Injury Risk Comparison

The modified Stoppa approach has significantly lower nerve injury risk compared to ilioinguinal approach. No lateral femoral cutaneous nerve at risk (this is sacrificed in 10-15% of ilioinguinal cases). Femoral nerve is not dissected. Only obturator nerve at potential risk, and this is rarely injured with proper technique. This is a significant advantage of Stoppa for isolated quadrilateral fractures.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Recovery Protocol

ImmediateDay 0-1

Foley catheter remains for 24-48 hours Monitor drain output (remove when less than 30mL/24h) DVT prophylaxis (LMWH or rivaroxaban) Early mobilization to chair with assistance

EarlyWeek 1-6

Toe-touch weight bearing (10-20kg) Hip and knee ROM exercises Avoid hip flexion greater than 90 degrees initially Continue DVT prophylaxis for 4-6 weeks

ProgressiveWeek 6-12

Partial weight bearing (50%) Increase ROM and strengthening X-rays at 6 weeks to assess healing Progress weight bearing based on healing

AdvancedMonth 3-6

Full weight bearing when callus visible Progressive strengthening Return to activities as tolerated Monitor for post-traumatic arthritis

Bladder-specific care:

  • Foley catheter for 24-48 hours (longer if bladder injury)
  • Monitor for hematuria (common, usually resolves)
  • Encourage fluids once catheter removed
  • If bladder repaired: catheter 7-10 days, cystogram before removal

Long-term outcomes:

  • Good-to-excellent results in 75-85% with anatomic reduction
  • Similar outcomes to ilioinguinal for quadrilateral fractures
  • Lower nerve injury complications
  • Better cosmetic satisfaction

Outcomes

Clinical Outcomes Summary

Functional Results:

  • Good to excellent: 75-85% with anatomic reduction (less than 2mm step-off)
  • Fair: 10-15% with imperfect reduction or complications
  • Poor: 5-10% with significant malreduction or post-traumatic arthritis

Comparison to Ilioinguinal Approach

Stoppa vs Ilioinguinal Outcomes

Outcome MeasureModified StoppaIlioinguinalSignificance
Quadrilateral reduction qualityExcellentGoodStoppa provides superior access
LFCN injury rate0%10-15%No LFCN in Stoppa field
Overall nerve injuryLess than 2%5-10%Less nerve dissection required
Wound complication2-5%5-8%Smaller incision in Stoppa
Operating time (isolated QS)ShorterLongerLess dissection needed

Predictors of Outcome

Positive Prognostic Factors:

  • Anatomic reduction (less than 2mm step-off)
  • Younger patient age (under 55 years)
  • Simple fracture pattern
  • Surgery within 14 days of injury
  • Intact femoral head cartilage

Negative Prognostic Factors:

  • Residual displacement greater than 2mm
  • Marginal impaction greater than 10mm
  • Age greater than 60 years
  • Associated femoral head injury
  • Initial posterior dislocation

Matta Outcome Criteria

Acetabular fracture outcomes are assessed using Matta radiographic criteria: Excellent = anatomic reduction (0mm displacement), Good = less than 2mm, Fair = 2-3mm, Poor = greater than 3mm. Clinical outcomes correlate strongly with quality of reduction - anatomic reduction gives 80%+ good/excellent results.

Long-Term Considerations

  • Post-traumatic arthritis: 20-30% at 10-20 years even with good reduction
  • Heterotopic ossification: 15-25% (reduced with prophylaxis)
  • Conversion to THA: 10-20% at 10 years
  • AVN femoral head: 5-10% (higher with initial dislocation)

Evidence Base

Cole and Bolhofner - Modified Stoppa for Acetabular Fractures

4
Cole JD, Bolhofner BR • Clin Orthop Relat Res (1994)
Key Findings:
  • Described modified Stoppa approach adapted from hernia technique
  • Superior access to quadrilateral surface compared to ilioinguinal medial window
  • Allows direct visualization and buttress plate application
  • Lower nerve injury risk than ilioinguinal approach
Clinical Implication: The modified Stoppa provides superior access to the quadrilateral surface and medial pelvic wall, making it the preferred approach for these injuries.
Limitation: Single-center series; steep learning curve for surgeons unfamiliar with intrapelvic approach.

Sagi et al - Stoppa vs Ilioinguinal for Anterior Acetabulum

3
Sagi HC, et al • J Orthop Trauma (2014)
Key Findings:
  • Comparative study: Stoppa had superior quadrilateral surface access
  • Lower lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury (0% vs 15%)
  • Similar fixation quality and fracture healing
  • Stoppa required less operative time for isolated quadrilateral fractures
Clinical Implication: For isolated quadrilateral surface fractures, the modified Stoppa approach offers advantages in nerve preservation and efficiency compared to ilioinguinal medial window.
Limitation: Retrospective comparison; selection bias toward simpler fractures for Stoppa.

Keel et al - Anterior Intrapelvic Approach (Combines Stoppa Concepts)

4
Keel MJ, et al • J Orthop Trauma (2012)
Key Findings:
  • Described anterior intrapelvic approach combining Stoppa and ilioinguinal concepts
  • Single incision provides access to medial and lateral structures
  • Good outcomes for complex anterior acetabular fractures
  • Requires significant experience with intrapelvic anatomy
Clinical Implication: The anterior intrapelvic approach represents evolution of the Stoppa technique, extending access laterally through a single incision.
Limitation: Technically demanding; requires expertise in both Stoppa and ilioinguinal anatomy.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Quadrilateral Surface Fracture Approach Selection

EXAMINER

"A 50-year-old female has an associated both-column acetabular fracture with 15mm medial displacement of the quadrilateral surface on CT. The femoral head is subluxing medially into the pelvis. What approach would you use for the anterior component and why?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has a both-column fracture with significant medial displacement of the quadrilateral surface and femoral head subluxation - this requires anterior fixation to prevent progressive medial displacement. For the anterior component, I would use the **modified Stoppa approach** because it provides superior access to the quadrilateral surface compared to the medial window of the ilioinguinal approach. The Stoppa approach works intrapelvically through the space of Retzius - the retropubic space between the bladder and pubic symphysis. This allows me to directly visualize the quadrilateral surface and apply a buttress plate from the superior pubic ramus to the ischium, creating an internal shelf to prevent medial subluxation. The key surgical steps would be: make a Pfannenstiel incision, develop the space of Retzius bluntly, mobilize the bladder posterolaterally, identify and ligate the corona mortis, expose the quadrilateral surface, reduce the fracture, and apply a pre-contoured quadrilateral buttress plate with screws into the superior ramus anteriorly and ischium posteriorly. For the posterior component of this both-column fracture, I would also perform a Kocher-Langenbeck approach to fix the posterior column, either staged or as a two-team simultaneous procedure. The advantages of Stoppa over ilioinguinal for this fracture include: better quadrilateral access, lower nerve injury risk (no lateral femoral cutaneous nerve at risk), and better cosmetic result.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Both-column fracture with medial displacement needs anterior stabilization
Modified Stoppa provides superior quadrilateral surface access
Works intrapelvically through space of Retzius
Bladder mobilization is key step - requires Foley catheter
Corona mortis must be identified and ligated
Buttress plate prevents medial subluxation
Combine with K-L for posterior component of both-column fracture
Lower nerve injury risk than ilioinguinal
COMMON TRAPS
✗Choosing ilioinguinal for quadrilateral surface (inferior access)
✗Not knowing what space of Retzius is
✗Forgetting corona mortis management
✗Not addressing posterior component of both-column fracture
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the space of Retzius?"
"How do you protect the bladder during dissection?"
"Where do you direct screws from a quadrilateral buttress plate?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Intraoperative Bladder Injury Recognition

EXAMINER

"During development of the space of Retzius in a modified Stoppa approach, you notice pink fluid in the wound and the anesthesiologist reports the Foley catheter is no longer draining. What is your immediate assessment and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This clinical picture strongly suggests **bladder injury** - pink fluid indicates urine (possibly with blood), and loss of Foley drainage suggests the catheter balloon may be in the wound rather than in the bladder. My immediate management would be: First, stop the dissection and assess the situation. Second, confirm bladder injury with a methylene blue test - have anesthesia instill 200-300mL of sterile saline mixed with methylene blue through the Foley catheter. If blue fluid appears in the wound, this confirms bladder injury. Third, identify the location and extent of injury - gently explore to find the defect in the bladder wall. Fourth, repair the injury primarily if identified: two-layer closure with 3-0 absorbable suture (inner layer mucosa-to-mucosa, outer layer seromuscular), ensuring watertight closure. Fifth, place a new Foley catheter under direct vision, ensuring balloon is in bladder lumen. Sixth, test the repair by filling bladder with methylene blue solution and checking for leaks. Seventh, consider urology consultation if the injury is complex (near trigone or ureteric orifices). Eighth, plan extended Foley catheter drainage (7-10 days instead of 24-48 hours) with cystogram before removal. The prevention strategy is to always work in the correct plane - between bladder wall and bone. If I see detrusor muscle fibers, I'm in the bladder wall and need to redirect. A decompressed bladder with Foley catheter makes injury less likely. After repair, I would complete the Stoppa approach as planned - bladder repair does not prevent proceeding with fracture fixation.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Pink fluid + loss of Foley drainage suggests bladder injury
Confirm with methylene blue test (instill through Foley)
Stop dissection and identify injury location
Primary two-layer repair with 3-0 absorbable suture
Replace Foley catheter under direct vision
Test repair by filling bladder with dye
Urology consultation for complex injuries (near trigone)
Extended catheter drainage (7-10 days) with cystogram
Prevention: correct plane dissection, Foley decompression
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not recognizing bladder injury
✗Continuing dissection without repair
✗Inadequate repair (single layer or not watertight)
✗Not planning extended catheter drainage
✗Aborting fracture fixation (bladder repair doesn't prevent continuing)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you perform a methylene blue test?"
"What is the correct plane for dissection in space of Retzius?"
"How long do you leave the Foley catheter after bladder repair?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Stoppa vs Ilioinguinal Decision Making

EXAMINER

"A 40-year-old male has a T-type acetabular fracture. The transverse component is minimally displaced posteriorly, but the anterior component (stem of the T) shows a low anterior column fracture with quadrilateral surface involvement and 10mm displacement. The iliac wing and high anterior column are intact. Which approach(es) would you use and why?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a **T-type fracture** - a transverse component plus vertical anterior component (the 'stem' of the T). The key decision is whether both components need surgical fixation and which approach(es) to use. In this case, the transverse component is minimally displaced and may be stable enough to accept, while the anterior stem component is significantly displaced and requires fixation. For the anterior component, I have two options: (1) **Modified Stoppa alone** or (2) **Combination of Stoppa (for quadrilateral) plus lateral window ilioinguinal (for anterior column)**. My choice would depend on the exact extent of the anterior column fracture. If the fracture is primarily **low anterior column involving quadrilateral surface**, I would use **Stoppa alone** - it provides excellent access to the quadrilateral surface and low anterior column, and I can fix the fracture with a buttress plate from superior ramus to ischium. If the fracture extends high into the anterior column toward the iliac wing, I would need to **add the lateral window of ilioinguinal approach** through a separate lateral incision or combined incision to access the superior extent. For the minimally displaced transverse component, I would assess stability intraoperatively - if the anterior fixation renders the fracture stable, I may not need posterior approach. However, if there's posterior instability or posterior wall involvement, I would add a Kocher-Langenbeck approach. The advantage of Stoppa for this fracture pattern is that it directly addresses the main pathology (quadrilateral displacement) without the extensive dissection of full ilioinguinal approach, giving me excellent medial wall access with lower morbidity. I would counsel the patient that this may be a single approach (Stoppa alone) or potentially require a second approach (K-L) if intraoperative assessment shows posterior instability.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
T-type = transverse + anterior stem component
Assess each component individually for displacement and need for fixation
Anterior stem with quadrilateral involvement is ideal for Stoppa
Modified Stoppa alone may suffice if low anterior column
Add lateral ilioinguinal window if high anterior column involved
Minimally displaced transverse may be stable after anterior fixation
Consider K-L if posterior component unstable
Stoppa advantages: excellent quadrilateral access, lower morbidity than full ilioinguinal
COMMON TRAPS
✗Automatically doing full ilioinguinal for any anterior column fracture
✗Not recognizing that Stoppa can address low anterior column + quadrilateral
✗Forgetting that minimally displaced transverse may not need fixation
✗Not having a decision algorithm for approach selection
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you assess intraoperative stability after anterior fixation?"
"Can you combine Stoppa with lateral ilioinguinal window in one incision?"
"What is the difference between T-type and associated both-column fractures?"

MCQ Practice Points

Space of Retzius Definition

Q: What is the space of Retzius and what are its boundaries? A: The space of Retzius is the retropubic extraperitoneal space between the bladder anteriorly and the posterior surface of the pubic symphysis. Boundaries: anterior = pubis, posterior = bladder and peritoneum, lateral = pelvic sidewall and external iliac vessels, inferior = pelvic floor.

Stoppa vs Ilioinguinal Access

Q: What is the primary advantage of modified Stoppa over ilioinguinal medial window for quadrilateral surface fractures? A: Superior direct visualization and access to the quadrilateral surface working intrapelvically. The Stoppa approach allows buttress plate application under direct vision, whereas ilioinguinal medial window has limited inferior and posterior access to the quadrilateral surface.

Quadrilateral Buttress Plate Function

Q: What is the biomechanical function of a quadrilateral buttress plate? A: The plate acts as an internal shelf preventing medial subluxation of the femoral head into the pelvis. It spans from superior pubic ramus anteriorly to ischium posteriorly, creating a mechanical buttress that resists medial displacement forces.

Nerve Injury Comparison

Q: Why does the modified Stoppa approach have lower nerve injury risk than ilioinguinal approach? A: The Stoppa approach does not dissect the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (injured or sacrificed in 10-15% of ilioinguinal cases) and does not mobilize the femoral nerve. The only nerve at potential risk is the obturator nerve, which is rarely injured with proper technique.

When Stoppa Cannot Be Used

Q: What are the anatomical limitations of the modified Stoppa approach? A: Stoppa cannot access the iliac wing, sacroiliac joint, or high anterior column - it is limited to medial structures (quadrilateral surface, superior pubic ramus, low anterior column). These superior structures require ilioinguinal lateral window or separate lateral approach if fixation needed.

Australian Context

Australian Trauma Network

Major Trauma Services:

  • Acetabular fractures are tertiary referrals
  • Major trauma centres in each state (Level 1)
  • Inter-hospital retrieval for complex pelvic/acetabular injuries
  • Fellowship-trained pelvic surgeons at major centres

Training Pathway:

  • AOA Orthopaedic Training Program
  • Pelvic and acetabular fellowship post-FRACS
  • AO Pelvic Course attendance

Medicare and Coding

  • 47936: ORIF acetabular fracture, first column
  • 47939: ORIF acetabular fracture, second column (additional)
  • 47942: ORIF acetabular fracture, complex (both columns)

DVT Prophylaxis Guidelines:

  • NHMRC recommendations for major pelvic surgery
  • Extended prophylaxis 28-35 days post-operatively
  • Chemical prophylaxis commenced 12-24h post-op

Exam Relevance

For the Australian orthopaedic exam, you must understand indications for Stoppa vs ilioinguinal, know the key anatomical structures (space of Retzius, corona mortis), and be able to describe the surgical technique step-by-step. Acetabular fracture management is a common viva topic testing decision-making and surgical planning skills.

MODIFIED STOPPA APPROACH

High-Yield Exam Summary

Space of Retzius Anatomy

  • •Retropubic extraperitoneal space between bladder and pubis
  • •Anterior boundary: Posterior surface of pubic symphysis
  • •Posterior boundary: Bladder wall and peritoneum
  • •Lateral boundary: Pelvic sidewall and external iliac vessels
  • •Developed bluntly - avascular plane when in correct layer

Key Surgical Steps

  • •1. Pfannenstiel or low midline incision (Pfannenstiel preferred)
  • •2. Develop space of Retzius bluntly with Foley catheter in place
  • •3. Mobilize bladder posterolaterally off quadrilateral surface
  • •4. Identify and ligate corona mortis on superior pubic ramus
  • •5. Expose quadrilateral surface from superior ramus to ischium
  • •6. Apply buttress plate from ramus to ischium

Indications

  • •Quadrilateral surface fractures (primary indication)
  • •Associated both-column fractures with medial displacement
  • •T-type fractures (anterior stem component)
  • •Low anterior column with quadrilateral involvement

Advantages Over Ilioinguinal

  • •Superior quadrilateral surface access (vs limited medial window)
  • •Lower nerve injury risk (no LFCN at risk, no femoral nerve dissection)
  • •Better cosmetic result (Pfannenstiel incision)
  • •Less operative time for isolated quadrilateral fractures

Limitations

  • •Cannot access iliac wing or high anterior column
  • •Cannot access SI joint
  • •Limited to medial structures only
  • •Requires combination with lateral approach for extensive anterior column

Key Complications and Prevention

  • •Bladder injury (1-3%): Foley catheter, correct plane, gentle dissection
  • •Peritoneal entry (5-10%): Stay below reflection, repair if entered
  • •Corona mortis hemorrhage: Identify and ligate early
  • •Obturator nerve injury: Rare - identify and protect nerve
Quick Stats
Complexityadvanced
Reading Time25 min
Updated2024-12-24
Related

Browse all procedures

View full catalog