Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Modified Stoppa Approach to the Acetabulum

Operative SurgeryTrauma
TraumaAdvancedCore Procedure

Modified Stoppa Approach to the Acetabulum

How to expose the quadrilateral surface and medial acetabular wall through the modified Stoppa (anterior intrapelvic) approach — the midline incision, developing the space of Retzius, mobilising the bladder, ligating the corona mortis, and applying a quadrilateral buttress plate. advanced orthopaedic operative-surgery guide.

Procedure console
25 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Midline approach | Quadrilateral surface | Suprapubic window

MidlinePfannenstiel or low midline incision
QuadrilateralOptimal access to medial wall
Space of RetziusRetropubic dissection plane
Less than 5%Nerve injury risk (vs 10-15% ilioinguinal)
Critical Must-Knows
  • Intrapelvic approach — works inside the pelvis through the space of Retzius, the retropubic extraperitoneal plane between the bladder and the pubic symphysis.
  • Superior access to the quadrilateral surface — better direct visualization than the medial window of the ilioinguinal approach.
  • Bladder mobilization is the key step — mobilize the bladder posterolaterally off the quadrilateral surface to expose bone; a Foley catheter is mandatory.
  • Corona mortis is encountered crossing the superior pubic ramus and must be identified and ligated before proceeding laterally.
  • Cannot access the iliac wing or high anterior column — limited to medial structures; combine with another approach for superior pathology.

When & Why


What it exposes. The modified Stoppa (anterior intrapelvic) approach gives direct intrapelvic access to the quadrilateral surface of the acetabulum, the medial wall, the superior pubic ramus and the low anterior column. Working from inside the pelvis through the space of Retzius, it allows buttress plating of the quadrilateral plate under direct vision to prevent medial subluxation of the femoral head. Why intrapelvic (and not ilioinguinal). The medial window of the ilioinguinal approach gives only limited inferior and posterior access to the quadrilateral surface. The Stoppa approach approaches the same bone from the intrapelvic side, giving superior visualization and plate application, with a lower nerve-injury profile (no lateral femoral cutaneous nerve at risk), and a more cosmetic Pfannenstiel incision. Its trade-off is that it cannot reach the iliac wing or the high anterior column. Historical context. The approach was adapted from the Stoppa hernia repair and popularised for acetabular fractures in the 1990s: - Original Stoppa — developed for inguinal/groin hernia repair using the retropubic (preperitoneal) space.

  • Hirvensalo and colleagues (1990s) — described the intrapelvic/ilioinguinal modification for pelvic and acetabular surgery.
  • Cole and Bolhofner (1994) — popularised the modified Stoppa approach for acetabular fracture surgery (Clin Orthop Relat Res).
  • Sagi, Collinge and others — coined the broader term anterior intrapelvic (AIP) approach and refined its indications.
  • Keel et al (2012) — described the Pararectus variant, entering extraperitoneally along the lateral border of rectus abdominis to create five working windows.
  • Current — intrapelvic approaches are increasingly preferred for quadrilateral surface and anterior column fractures, especially in the elderly.
Anterior column (low)
Stoppa role
Primary approach
Combined approach
Stoppa alone or + lateral window
Rationale
Direct quadrilateral access
Anterior column (high)
Stoppa role
Cannot use Stoppa
Combined approach
Ilioinguinal required
Rationale
No access to iliac wing
T-type
Stoppa role
Anterior component
Combined approach
Stoppa + Kocher-Langenbeck
Rationale
Stoppa for stem, K-L for transverse
Associated both-column
Stoppa role
Anterior fixation
Combined approach
Stoppa + K-L
Rationale
Excellent medial buttress access
Transverse + posterior wall
Stoppa role
Rarely indicated
Combined approach
Kocher-Langenbeck preferred
Rationale
Posterior approach addresses both
Fracture patterns suited to the modified Stoppa
Fracture patternStoppa roleCombined approachRationale
Anterior column (low)Primary approachStoppa alone or + lateral windowDirect quadrilateral access
Anterior column (high)Cannot use StoppaIlioinguinal requiredNo access to iliac wing
T-typeAnterior componentStoppa + Kocher-LangenbeckStoppa for stem, K-L for transverse
Associated both-columnAnterior fixationStoppa + K-LExcellent medial buttress access
Transverse + posterior wallRarely indicatedKocher-Langenbeck preferredPosterior approach addresses both

Contraindications and when not to use it. - Absolute: previous lower midline laparotomy with extensive adhesions; active pelvic infection.

  • Relative: previous pelvic surgery; extensive scarring in the retropubic space; confirmed bladder injury requiring repair (may still proceed with urology input).
  • When NOT to use Stoppa: high anterior column fractures (no access to the iliac wing); anterior wall without quadrilateral involvement (ilioinguinal is better); SI joint pathology (needs the ilioinguinal lateral window).
Bladder injury workup before surgery

If there is blood at the urethral meatus or gross hematuria, obtain a retrograde urethrogram (if urethral injury is suspected) and a CT cystogram before surgery. A known bladder injury is not an absolute contraindication, but it requires urology consultation and careful surgical planning.

Position and landmarks. - Supine on a radiolucent table (essential for fluoroscopy).

  • Arms tucked (preferred) to allow the surgeon to move around.
  • A bump under the ipsilateral hip is usually NOT recommended — it makes the quadrilateral surface more vertical and harder to visualize; a flat pelvis is preferred.
  • Foley catheter is MANDATORY, placed before draping to decompress the bladder.
  • Wide preparation from nipples to knees. The C-arm must be able to swing for Inlet, Outlet and Judet views.
  • The surgeon stands on the CONTRA-lateral side, looking across the pelvis at the fracture; the assistant stands on the IPSI-lateral side to retract the bladder.
Quadrilateral surface alone
Best approach
Modified Stoppa
Rationale
Direct visualization, better plate placement
Alternative
Ilioinguinal medial window (inferior access)
Anterior column (high)
Best approach
Ilioinguinal
Rationale
Need lateral and middle windows
Alternative
Cannot access with Stoppa alone
Anterior column (low) + quadrilateral
Best approach
Combined: Stoppa + lateral ilioinguinal
Rationale
Stoppa for quadrilateral, lateral window for column
Alternative
Full ilioinguinal but less quadrilateral access
Both-column with medial displacement
Best approach
Stoppa + Kocher-Langenbeck
Rationale
Stoppa for anterior, K-L for posterior
Alternative
Ilioinguinal + K-L (traditional)
Modified Stoppa vs ilioinguinal — decision making
Fracture locationBest approachRationaleAlternative
Quadrilateral surface aloneModified StoppaDirect visualization, better plate placementIlioinguinal medial window (inferior access)
Anterior column (high)IlioinguinalNeed lateral and middle windowsCannot access with Stoppa alone
Anterior column (low) + quadrilateralCombined: Stoppa + lateral ilioinguinalStoppa for quadrilateral, lateral window for columnFull ilioinguinal but less quadrilateral access
Both-column with medial displacementStoppa + Kocher-LangenbeckStoppa for anterior, K-L for posteriorIlioinguinal + K-L (traditional)
Stoppa vs ilioinguinal for the quadrilateral surface

The modified Stoppa provides superior access to the quadrilateral surface compared with the medial window of the ilioinguinal approach. Working intrapelvically allows direct visualization and buttress plate application to prevent medial subluxation. However, Stoppa cannot access the iliac wing or high anterior column — those still require ilioinguinal lateral and middle windows.

Stoppa is an alternative, not a replacement

The modified Stoppa is NOT a replacement for the ilioinguinal approach — it is an alternative for specific patterns involving the quadrilateral surface. High anterior column and iliac wing fractures still require the ilioinguinal lateral and middle windows.

The Exposure


Work down the midline to the pubis, develop the space of Retzius bluntly, mobilise the bladder off the quadrilateral surface, ligate the corona mortis on the superior pubic ramus, and complete a subperiosteal exposure from the superior ramus to the ischium — ready for buttress plating.

Modified Stoppa approach
Modified Stoppa (intrapelvic) approach exposing the quadrilateral plate and anterior column.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

The space of Retzius is the key corridor — a potential extraperitoneal space between the bladder and the posterior surface of the pubic symphysis. - Anterior: posterior surface of the pubic symphysis and superior rami.

  • Posterior: anterior wall of the bladder and peritoneum.
  • Superior: peritoneal reflection.
  • Inferior: pelvic floor (levator ani, obturator internus).
  • Lateral: pelvic sidewall and external iliac vessels.
Bladder
Location
Posterior to pubis
Relationship to approach
Must mobilize posterolaterally
Clinical significance
Injury risk if not in correct plane — use Foley
Peritoneum
Location
Covers bladder dome
Relationship to approach
Stay below the peritoneal reflection
Clinical significance
Entry causes bowel complications — repair if entered
External iliac vessels
Location
Lateral pelvic sidewall
Relationship to approach
Lateral boundary of the first window
Clinical significance
Retract laterally for extended exposure
Obturator neurovascular bundle
Location
Obturator foramen, on obturator internus
Relationship to approach
Identify and protect during dissection
Clinical significance
Injury risk during lateral dissection
Corona mortis
Location
Superior pubic ramus (40-96mm from symphysis)
Relationship to approach
Encountered during lateral dissection
Clinical significance
Present in ~80% anatomically; ligate before proceeding
Structures and their relationships during the approach
StructureLocationRelationship to approachClinical significance
BladderPosterior to pubisMust mobilize posterolaterallyInjury risk if not in correct plane — use Foley
PeritoneumCovers bladder domeStay below the peritoneal reflectionEntry causes bowel complications — repair if entered
External iliac vesselsLateral pelvic sidewallLateral boundary of the first windowRetract laterally for extended exposure
Obturator neurovascular bundleObturator foramen, on obturator internusIdentify and protect during dissectionInjury risk during lateral dissection
Corona mortisSuperior pubic ramus (40-96mm from symphysis)Encountered during lateral dissectionPresent in ~80% anatomically; ligate before proceeding

Quadrilateral surface anatomy. The quadrilateral surface is the medial wall of the acetabulum on the inner table of the pelvis — four-sided, with the pelvic brim superiorly, the obturator foramen inferiorly, the superior ramus anteriorly and the ischium posteriorly. It resists medial subluxation of the femoral head; when fractured, the head can displace medially into the pelvis.

First window (medial)
Boundaries
Bladder (medial), external iliac vessels (lateral)
Exposes
Quadrilateral surface, superior ramus
Fixation
Quadrilateral buttress plate
Second window (lateral)
Boundaries
External iliac vessels (medial), psoas (lateral)
Exposes
Low anterior column, pelvic brim
Fixation
Infrapectineal plate if needed
Working windows of the intrapelvic exposure
WindowBoundariesExposesFixation
First window (medial)Bladder (medial), external iliac vessels (lateral)Quadrilateral surface, superior ramusQuadrilateral buttress plate
Second window (lateral)External iliac vessels (medial), psoas (lateral)Low anterior column, pelvic brimInfrapectineal plate if needed
Nervous anatomy distinction

Unlike the ilioinguinal approach, which works between nerve territories (femoral, gluteal, lateral femoral cutaneous), the Stoppa is an intrapelvic, extraperitoneal approach that avoids the major traversing nerves of the anterior thigh. The obturator nerve is the only major nerve at risk, lying on the pelvic sidewall on obturator internus.

Exposure sequence

Step 1Incision
  • Pfannenstiel (preferred): a transverse suprapubic incision 2-3cm above the pubic symphysis, 10-15cm long — better cosmetic result, familiar to general surgeons and gynaecologists.
  • Low midline (alternative): vertical midline from the umbilicus toward the symphysis — better extensibility but a higher wound-complication rate; reserved when Pfannenstiel is contraindicated.
Step 2Open the anterior rectus sheath and split the rectus
  • Incise the anterior rectus sheath transversely (Pfannenstiel) or vertically (midline).
  • Identify the rectus abdominis muscles; separate them in the midline (linea alba for midline) or retract them laterally (Pfannenstiel).
Step 3Enter the space of Retzius
  • Identify the transversalis fascia and dissect gently down to the pubic symphysis.
  • Feel the bladder dome (soft, mobile, Foley balloon palpable).
  • Begin blunt dissection between the bladder and the symphysis.
Step 4Develop the space bluntly
  • Use a sponge stick or finger dissection; sweep the bladder posteriorly and laterally off the pubis.
  • Develop the space laterally to the pelvic sidewall.
  • Identify the superior pubic rami bilaterally and confirm you are extraperitoneal (no bowel visible).
Step 5Mobilize the bladder off the quadrilateral surface (first window)
  • Continue blunt dissection posterolaterally; mobilize the bladder off the quadrilateral surface toward the obturator foramen.
  • Retract the bladder medially with a broad retractor (assistant on the ipsilateral side).
  • Identify the external iliac artery and vein on the pelvic sidewall as the lateral boundary of the first window.
Step 6Identify and ligate the corona mortis
  • Approach the superior pubic ramus carefully and identify any vessels crossing it (the corona mortis, 40-96mm from the symphysis).
  • Clip or ligate with 2-0 silk; confirm hemostasis before proceeding laterally.
Step 7Subperiosteal exposure of the quadrilateral surface
  • Complete a subperiosteal dissection along the quadrilateral surface; identify the fracture lines.
  • Expose the superior ramus anteriorly and the ischium posteriorly for plate application.
  • Identify and protect the obturator neurovascular bundle throughout.
Stay in the correct plane in the space of Retzius

The correct plane is between the bladder wall and the bone — relatively avascular loose areolar tissue that sweeps easily with blunt dissection. If you see detrusor muscle you are in the bladder wall; if you see glistening peritoneum you are too superficial. Significant bleeding means you are likely in the bladder wall or have entered a vessel. Always place a Foley catheter to decompress the bladder before dissection, and use a sponge stick for gentle blunt sweeping.

Quadrilateral buttress plate biomechanics

The quadrilateral buttress plate acts as an internal shelf preventing medial subluxation of the femoral head. It spans from the superior pubic ramus anteriorly to the ischium posteriorly, creating a buttress that resists medial displacement. Screw fixation into intact bone (ramus and ischium) provides stability — biomechanically superior to trying to reduce and fix the quadrilateral fragment itself.

Reduction and buttress plating

Step 1Reduction maneuvers
  • Pelvic clamp to compress a laterally displaced fracture.
  • Ball-spike pusher to push the displaced quadrilateral fragment laterally.
  • Pointed reduction forceps for temporary hold.
  • Assess reduction with fluoroscopy — the inlet view shows the quadrilateral reduction.
Step 2Plate selection
  • Pre-contoured quadrilateral plate (if available), or a 3.5mm reconstruction plate contoured to shape.
  • The plate spans from the superior ramus (anteriorly) to the ischium (posteriorly).
Step 3Plate position
  • Place the plate on the quadrilateral surface (inner pelvic wall).
  • Anterior screws into the superior pubic ramus; posterior screws into the ischium or retroacetabular surface.
  • Central screw holes may be left empty so the plate acts as a buttress.
Step 4Screw fixation
  • Drill and measure carefully; 3.5mm cortical screws, typically 40-60mm in length.
  • Avoid intra-articular penetration (check with fluoroscopy).
  • The obturator oblique view shows the retroacetabular safe zone between the sciatic notches.
Step 5Final fluoroscopic assessment
  • AP, obturator oblique and inlet views.
  • Confirm plate position and screw lengths; assess reduction of the quadrilateral surface.
  • Check for any intra-articular hardware.
Screw direction for the quadrilateral plate

Posterior screws from the quadrilateral plate can be directed into the ischium or into the retroacetabular safe zone (between the sciatic notches). The obturator oblique view shows this zone well. Screws must avoid the hip joint — aim posteriorly and inferiorly, not laterally into the acetabulum.

Dangers & Extensions


Bladder injury
Incidence
1-3%
Prevention / management
Foley catheter, correct-plane dissection; repair primarily if injured, consult urology
Peritoneal entry
Incidence
5-10%
Prevention / management
Stay below the peritoneal reflection; repair if entered, no long-term consequence
External iliac vessel injury
Incidence
Less than 1%
Prevention / management
Gentle dissection if mobilizing for the second window; have vascular backup
Corona mortis hemorrhage
Incidence
Anastomosis in ~80% anatomically; troublesome bleeding less common clinically
Prevention / management
Identify and ligate early; control with clips or ties if bleeding
Heterotopic ossification
Incidence
10-20%
Prevention / management
Indomethacin 75mg daily for 6 weeks, or single-dose radiation
Wound infection
Incidence
2-5%
Prevention / management
Prophylactic antibiotics, minimize dead space, drain placement
Obturator nerve injury
Incidence
Rare (less than 1%)
Prevention / management
Identify and protect the nerve during dissection
Complications of the modified Stoppa approach
ComplicationIncidencePrevention / management
Bladder injury1-3%Foley catheter, correct-plane dissection; repair primarily if injured, consult urology
Peritoneal entry5-10%Stay below the peritoneal reflection; repair if entered, no long-term consequence
External iliac vessel injuryLess than 1%Gentle dissection if mobilizing for the second window; have vascular backup
Corona mortis hemorrhageAnastomosis in ~80% anatomically; troublesome bleeding less common clinicallyIdentify and ligate early; control with clips or ties if bleeding
Heterotopic ossification10-20%Indomethacin 75mg daily for 6 weeks, or single-dose radiation
Wound infection2-5%Prophylactic antibiotics, minimize dead space, drain placement
Obturator nerve injuryRare (less than 1%)Identify and protect the nerve during dissection

Bladder injury management. Recognize intraoperatively when possible (methylene blue test); perform a primary two-layer repair with 3-0 absorbable suture; leave the Foley catheter for 7-10 days; obtain a cystogram before catheter removal; consult urology for complex injuries near the trigone. Vascular injury management. Apply direct pressure for control; obtain vascular surgery consultation; perform primary repair for small injuries; use a graft for extensive injury.

Nerve injury risk comparison

The modified Stoppa has a significantly lower nerve injury risk than the ilioinguinal approach. There is no lateral femoral cutaneous nerve at risk (injured or sacrificed in 10-15% of ilioinguinal cases), and the femoral nerve is not dissected. Only the obturator nerve is at potential risk, and it is rarely injured with proper technique — a major advantage of Stoppa for isolated quadrilateral fractures.

Extensions and combining approaches. The modified Stoppa is rarely used in isolation — it typically combines with other techniques for complete fracture management. - Stoppa + Kocher-Langenbeck (most common): both-column with medial displacement and T-type fractures. Position sequentially (supine for Stoppa, then lateral for K-L), as a two-team lateral approach, or a floating position.

  • Stoppa + lateral window of ilioinguinal: single supine position, via a combined or separate incision, for low anterior column extending beyond the quadrilateral.
  • Stoppa + percutaneous screw: quadrilateral surface plus posterior column without wall — Stoppa for the anterior component, screw for the posterior, minimizing surgical trauma.
Timing and positioning when combining approaches

When combining Stoppa with Kocher-Langenbeck, consider operative time carefully — prolonged prone or lateral positioning increases DVT risk. Many surgeons prefer staged procedures 5-7 days apart for complex fractures to reduce physiological stress.

Closure. - Hemostasis: meticulous — there is a large dead space in the retropubic region; check for bladder injury (fill with methylene blue if suspicious) and ensure the corona mortis is ligated.

  • Layers: posterior rectus sheath (if entered) with 0 or 1 absorbable continuous; anterior rectus sheath with 0 or 1 absorbable continuous; Scarpa's fascia with 2-0 absorbable interrupted; skin with staples or subcuticular suture.
  • Drain: a retropubic drain (10mm flat or 15Fr round) through a separate stab incision, removed at 24-48h when output is less than 30mL/day.
  • Post-closure: check the Foley is still draining (not kinked or clamped); final fluoroscopy (AP, obturator, inlet); document neurovascular status.

Recovery protocol

Day 0-1Immediate
  • Foley catheter remains for 24-48 hours; monitor drain output (remove when less than 30mL/24h).
  • DVT prophylaxis (LMWH or rivaroxaban); early mobilization to chair with assistance.
Week 1-6Early
  • Toe-touch weight bearing (10-20kg); hip and knee ROM exercises.
  • Avoid hip flexion greater than 90 degrees initially; continue DVT prophylaxis for 4-6 weeks.
Week 6-12Progressive
  • Partial weight bearing (50%); increase ROM and strengthening.
  • X-rays at 6 weeks to assess healing; progress weight bearing based on healing.
Month 3-6Advanced
  • Full weight bearing when callus is visible; progressive strengthening.
  • Return to activities as tolerated; monitor for post-traumatic arthritis.
Quadrilateral reduction quality
Modified Stoppa
Excellent
Ilioinguinal
Good
Significance
Stoppa provides superior access
LFCN injury rate
Modified Stoppa
0%
Ilioinguinal
10-15%
Significance
No LFCN in Stoppa field
Overall nerve injury
Modified Stoppa
Less than 2%
Ilioinguinal
5-10%
Significance
Less nerve dissection required
Wound complication
Modified Stoppa
2-5%
Ilioinguinal
5-8%
Significance
Smaller incision in Stoppa
Operating time (isolated QS)
Modified Stoppa
Shorter
Ilioinguinal
Longer
Significance
Less dissection needed
Stoppa vs ilioinguinal — outcomes
Outcome measureModified StoppaIlioinguinalSignificance
Quadrilateral reduction qualityExcellentGoodStoppa provides superior access
LFCN injury rate0%10-15%No LFCN in Stoppa field
Overall nerve injuryLess than 2%5-10%Less nerve dissection required
Wound complication2-5%5-8%Smaller incision in Stoppa
Operating time (isolated QS)ShorterLongerLess dissection needed

Long-term outcomes. Good-to-excellent results in 75-85% with anatomic reduction. Post-traumatic arthritis occurs in 20-30% at 10-20 years even with good reduction; heterotopic ossification in 15-25% (reduced with prophylaxis); conversion to total hip arthroplasty in 10-20% at 10 years; avascular necrosis of the femoral head in 5-10% (higher with initial dislocation).

Matta outcome criteria

Acetabular fracture outcomes are graded with Matta radiographic criteria: Excellent = anatomic reduction (0mm displacement); Good = less than 2mm; Fair = 2-3mm; Poor = greater than 3mm. Clinical outcomes correlate strongly with the quality of reduction — anatomic reduction gives 80% or more good/excellent results.

Procedures Through This Approach


  • Acetabular fracture ORIF — anterior column — fixation of the low anterior column and quadrilateral surface through this intrapelvic corridor.
  • Acetabular fracture ORIF — both-column — anterior (medial wall) component of associated both-column fractures.
  • Quadrilateral buttress plating for medial-wall fractures with femoral head subluxation — the principal fixation this approach is built for.
  • Anterior stem fixation in T-type fractures (combined with Kocher-Langenbeck for the transverse component).
  • Low anterior column with quadrilateral involvement (Stoppa alone, or combined with the lateral window of the ilioinguinal for superior column extension).

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

STOPPASTOPPA — key steps of the approach

S
Space of Retzius
Develop the retropubic space bluntly
T
Take down bladder
Mobilize the bladder posterolaterally
O
Obturator identification
Identify the obturator neurovascular bundle
P
Pubis exposure
Expose the superior pubic ramus and quadrilateral
P
Plate quadrilateral
Apply a buttress plate to prevent subluxation
A
Avoid bladder injury
Foley catheter, gentle dissection, correct plane
Mnemonic

RETZIUSRETZIUS — anatomical boundaries

R
Retropubic location
Behind the pubic symphysis
E
Extraperitoneal
Stay outside the peritoneum
T
Transversalis fascia
Layer traversed to enter the space
Z
Zone of bladder
Bladder is the posterior wall to mobilize
I
Iliac vessels lateral
Lateral boundary of the first window
U
Urogenital structures
Bladder, prostate/uterus to mobilize
S
Symphysis pubis
Anterior floor of the space
What is the space of Retzius?

The space of Retzius is the retropubic extraperitoneal space between the bladder and the posterior surface of the pubic symphysis. Boundaries: anterior = pubis; posterior = bladder and peritoneum; lateral = pelvic sidewall and external iliac vessels; inferior = pelvic floor.

Why Stoppa over the ilioinguinal medial window?

Superior direct visualization and access to the quadrilateral surface working intrapelvically. The Stoppa approach allows buttress plate application under direct vision, whereas the ilioinguinal medial window has limited inferior and posterior access to the quadrilateral surface.

Biomechanical function of the quadrilateral buttress plate

The plate acts as an internal shelf preventing medial subluxation of the femoral head into the pelvis. It spans from the superior pubic ramus anteriorly to the ischium posteriorly, creating a mechanical buttress that resists medial displacement forces.

Why is the nerve injury risk lower than ilioinguinal?

The Stoppa does not dissect the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (injured or sacrificed in 10-15% of ilioinguinal cases) and does not mobilize the femoral nerve. The only nerve at potential risk is the obturator nerve, which is rarely injured with proper technique.

When the Stoppa cannot be used

Stoppa cannot access the iliac wing, sacroiliac joint, or high anterior column — it is limited to medial structures (quadrilateral surface, superior pubic ramus, low anterior column). These superior structures require the ilioinguinal lateral window or a separate lateral approach.

Exam viva scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

“A 50-year-old female has an associated both-column acetabular fracture with 15mm medial displacement of the quadrilateral surface on CT, and the femoral head is subluxing medially into the pelvis. What approach would you use for the anterior component and why?”

Viva scenarioChallenging
Clinical prompt

“During development of the space of Retzius in a modified Stoppa approach, you notice pink fluid in the wound and the anesthesiologist reports the Foley catheter is no longer draining. What is your immediate assessment and management?”

Viva scenarioCritical
Clinical prompt

“A 40-year-old male has a T-type acetabular fracture. The transverse component is minimally displaced posteriorly, but the anterior component (stem of the T) shows a low anterior column fracture with quadrilateral surface involvement and 10mm displacement. The iliac wing and high anterior column are intact. Which approach(es) would you use and why?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Modified Stoppa approach — exam-day essentials

Space of Retzius anatomy

  • Retropubic extraperitoneal space between the bladder and pubis
  • Anterior: posterior surface of pubic symphysis
  • Posterior: bladder wall and peritoneum
  • Lateral: pelvic sidewall and external iliac vessels
  • Developed bluntly — avascular plane when in the correct layer

Key surgical steps

  • 1. Pfannenstiel or low midline incision (Pfannenstiel preferred)
  • 2. Develop the space of Retzius bluntly with a Foley catheter in place
  • 3. Mobilize the bladder posterolaterally off the quadrilateral surface
  • 4. Identify and ligate the corona mortis on the superior pubic ramus
  • 5. Expose the quadrilateral surface from superior ramus to ischium
  • 6. Apply a buttress plate from ramus to ischium

Indications

  • Quadrilateral surface fractures (primary indication)
  • Associated both-column fractures with medial displacement
  • T-type fractures (anterior stem component)
  • Low anterior column with quadrilateral involvement

Advantages over ilioinguinal

  • Superior quadrilateral surface access (vs limited medial window)
  • Lower nerve injury risk (no LFCN at risk, no femoral nerve dissection)
  • Better cosmetic result (Pfannenstiel incision)
  • Less operative time for isolated quadrilateral fractures

Limitations

  • Cannot access the iliac wing or high anterior column
  • Cannot access the SI joint
  • Limited to medial structures only
  • Requires combination with a lateral approach for extensive anterior column

Key complications and prevention

  • Bladder injury (1-3%): Foley catheter, correct plane, gentle dissection
  • Peritoneal entry (5-10%): stay below the reflection, repair if entered
  • Corona mortis hemorrhage: identify and ligate early
  • Obturator nerve injury: rare — identify and protect the nerve
Space of Retzius

The retropubic space between the bladder and the pubic symphysis. This avascular plane is the key to the approach — develop it bluntly to reach the medial pelvic wall without entering the peritoneum or damaging the bladder.

Quadrilateral surface access

The modified Stoppa provides superior access to the quadrilateral surface compared with the ilioinguinal medial window. Direct visualization allows placement of buttress plates to prevent medial subluxation of the femoral head.

Bladder mobilization

Mobilize the bladder posterolaterally off the quadrilateral surface — the key maneuver, with gentle blunt dissection in the correct plane. A Foley catheter is essential to decompress the bladder and reduce injury risk.

Corona mortis

As in the ilioinguinal approach, the corona mortis crosses the superior pubic ramus, typically 40-96mm lateral to the symphysis. Anatomical prevalence is high (around 80%; large vessels over 3mm in roughly 60% of hemipelves), so anticipate, identify and ligate it before proceeding laterally — a venous variant is most common and harder to control once torn.

References


Service organisation and referral

Globally consistent principles: displaced acetabular fractures are managed in specialist pelvic/acetabular units with fellowship-trained surgeons; inter-hospital transfer of complex patterns to high-volume centres improves reduction quality and outcomes. AO Foundation and BOA (BOAST: Pelvic and Acetabular Fracture Management) endorse early CT, multidisciplinary care and timely transfer. Training pathways (advanced orthopaedic practice Tr & Orth, advanced orthopaedic practice/AOA, advanced orthopaedic practice, DNB/MS) converge on the same competency; an AO Pelvis course and cadaveric simulation are widely recommended before independent intrapelvic surgery.

Evidence, outcomes and VTE prophylaxis

Reduction-driven outcomes (Matta): anatomic reduction (under 2mm) is the strongest modifiable predictor of good/excellent results across all series. VTE prophylaxis (society guidance differs): mechanical prophylaxis universally; chemical prophylaxis once haemostasis is secure. AAOS, NICE and regional consensus support extended prophylaxis after major pelvic/acetabular surgery, individualised to bleeding risk; no single global duration is mandated, commonly continued for several weeks.

Exam relevance

Across advanced orthopaedic practice and DNB vivas, you must be able to justify the intrapelvic (modified Stoppa / AIP / Pararectus) approach versus the ilioinguinal, name the key structures (space of Retzius, corona mortis, obturator and external iliac vessels), and describe the technique step-by-step. Acetabular fracture management is a recurring viva topic testing decision-making and surgical planning.

Evidence

Cole and Bolhofner — Modified Stoppa for Acetabular Fractures (Landmark Technique)

Guideline
Cole JD, Bolhofner BR • Clin Orthop Relat Res (1994)
Key Findings:
  • Popularised the modified Stoppa approach for acetabular fractures, adapted from the Stoppa hernia technique
  • Direct intrapelvic access to the quadrilateral surface and medial pelvic wall
  • Allows buttress plating under direct vision to resist medial femoral head displacement
  • Avoids dissection of the lateral femoral cutaneous and femoral nerves
Clinical implication: The modified Stoppa provides superior access to the quadrilateral surface and medial pelvic wall, establishing the intrapelvic corridor used in modern AIP and Pararectus variants.
Limitation: Original descriptive series predates electronic indexing (no PubMed PMID/DOI); steep learning curve for surgeons unfamiliar with intrapelvic anatomy.
Evidence

Matta — Accuracy of Reduction and Clinical Results in Acetabular Fractures

LoE 3
Matta JM • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1996)
Key Findings:
  • 262 displaced acetabular fractures fixed within 21 days, mean 6-year follow-up
  • Anatomic reduction achieved in 71%; reduction quality fell with fracture complexity, older age and delay
  • Excellent/good clinical result in 76% (40% excellent, 36% good); poor in 16%
  • Clinical outcome correlated closely with quality of radiographic reduction
Clinical implication: Anatomic reduction (under 2mm) is the single most important modifiable determinant of outcome — the rationale for choosing an approach (such as modified Stoppa) that best exposes the displaced fragment.
Limitation: Single-surgeon series using traditional approaches; predates routine intrapelvic/AIP technique.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 8934477)
Evidence

Keel et al — The Pararectus Approach: Anatomical Study and Clinical Evaluation

LoE 4
Keel MJB, Ecker TM, Cullmann JL, et al • J Bone Joint Surg Br (2012)
Key Findings:
  • Described the Pararectus intrapelvic approach using five extraperitoneal windows along the lateral border of rectus abdominis
  • Cadaveric validation (10 hemipelves) confirmed safe dissection and multidirectional screw placement
  • 20 patients: mean step-off improved 3.3mm to 0.1mm and mean gap 11.5mm to 0.8mm (both p less than 0.001)
  • Access morbidity low: 2 peritoneal lesions and 2 minor vascular injuries
Clinical implication: The Pararectus approach extends the intrapelvic concept, combining advantages of the ilioinguinal and modified Stoppa approaches for anterior column and quadrilateral plate fractures.
Limitation: Small single-centre cohort with short follow-up; technically demanding.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 22371551)
Evidence

Bastian/Keel et al — Pararectus versus Modified Stoppa: Exposure and Instrumentation

LoE 4
Bastian JD, Savic M, Cullmann JL, et al • Injury (2016)
Key Findings:
  • Paired cadaveric study (5 specimens) comparing both approaches through a 10cm incision
  • Exposed inner hemipelvis bone: 42% with Pararectus versus 29% with modified Stoppa (p=0.011)
  • Pararectus allowed posterior column screws 1.8-2.1x longer and more posteromedial trajectories
  • Greater false-pelvis access and the option to extend without a new incision
Clinical implication: Confirms the modified Stoppa is a medial-corridor workhorse but has finite reach; the Pararectus offers more posterior false-pelvis access for complex anterior column patterns.
Limitation: Cadaveric, small sample (elderly specimens); not a clinical outcome comparison.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 26861799)
Evidence

Darmanis et al — Corona Mortis: Anatomical Study with Clinical Implications

LoE 4
Darmanis S, Lewis A, Mansoor A, Bircher M • Clin Anat (2007)
Key Findings:
  • 80 hemipelves dissected: a retropubic anastomosis (corona mortis) present in 83%
  • Large-calibre channel over 3mm behind the superior pubic ramus in 60% of specimens, 40-96mm from the symphysis
  • In 492 clinical anterior approaches, only 5 problematic vessels and 2 troublesome bleeds occurred
  • High anatomical prevalence but lower clinical hazard than feared — caution, not avoidance
Clinical implication: Anticipate and ligate the corona mortis during lateral dissection along the superior ramus in any anterior/intrapelvic approach; a venous variant is common and harder to control once torn.
Limitation: Single senior-author clinical series; anatomical-to-clinical discrepancy not fully explained.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 16944498)
Evidence

Nadeem et al — Infrapectineal Buttress Plating of the Quadrilateral Surface via AIP

LoE 4
Nadeem U, Qadir I, Mazari J, Zaman AU, Aziz A • Hip Pelvis (2021)
Key Findings:
  • 21 patients with quadrilateral-plate acetabular fractures fixed via anterior intrapelvic (modified Stoppa) approach
  • Matta reduction anatomic in 14, imperfect in 5, poor in 2
  • Functional outcome (modified Merle d'Aubigne) excellent 47.6%, good 42.9%, fair 9.5%
  • Both fair outcomes had non-anatomical reduction; one required later total hip arthroplasty
Clinical implication: Infrapectineal/quadrilateral buttress plating through the intrapelvic corridor delivers high anatomical reduction rates and good function, reinforcing the buttress principle for medial wall fractures.
Limitation: Small retrospective single-centre series with short follow-up.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 33748024)
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
25 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
25 min
Updated
2026-06-20
PROCEDURES USING THIS APPROACH
Acetabular Fracture ORIF - Anterior ColumnAcetabular Fracture ORIF - Both Column
Browse all procedures