Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • For Training Programs
  • Authors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Methodology
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Back to Operative Surgery
Hand & Upper Limb

Thompson Approach (Posterior Interosseous Nerve Exposure)

Comprehensive guide to the Thompson posterior interosseous approach to the proximal radius with emphasis on PIN protection, supinator splitting technique, and safe exposure of the proximal-middle radial shaft

intermediate
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Orthopaedic clinicians and medical editors • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Editorial boardMethodologyReview policyReport a correction
High Yield Overview

THOMPSON APPROACH (PIN EXPOSURE)

Supinator Split | PIN at Arcade of Frohse | Proximal-Middle Radius Access

0.5-2%PIN iatrogenic injury risk during Thompson approach (Kaplan 1978)
38mmArcade of Frohse distance distal to radial head - PIN most vulnerable site (range 20-60mm, Prasartritha 1993)
11%PIN palsy in proximal 1/3 radius fractures, 90% spontaneous recovery by 4-6 months (Ring 2004)
45-55mmSupinator muscle length (origin lateral epicondyle to insertion middle 1/3 radius)
50-70%PIN compression syndromes occur at Arcade of Frohse (Spinner 1968)
<1% vs 2%PIN injury risk: Henry approach vs Thompson approach (Henry SAFER - Witt 2014)

Critical Must-Knows

  • Thompson approach: POSTERIOR access to proximal-middle radial shaft (radial head to middle 1/3), ideal for PIN exploration/decompression and radial shaft fracture fixation
  • Arcade of Frohse: Fibrous arch at proximal supinator edge where PIN enters supinator muscle (38±8mm distal to radial head, primary site of PIN compression in 50-70% of entrapment syndromes - Spinner 1968)
  • Supinator splitting technique: Split supinator muscle IN LINE with fibers from radial (lateral) to ulnar (medial) side - PIN lies on DEEP surface between supinator and radius periosteum (Thompson 1918)
  • PIN innervation pattern: Innervates ALL posterior forearm muscles EXCEPT brachioradialis and ECRL (these innervated by radial nerve BEFORE PIN bifurcation, preserved in PIN palsies - distinguishes PIN palsy from high radial nerve injury)
  • Henry vs Thompson safety: Henry anterolateral approach SAFER for proximal radius fractures (less than 1% PIN injury vs 2% Thompson - Witt 2014), use Henry unless PIN exploration specifically indicated
  • Thompson contraindication: Distal 1/3 radius fractures (PIN terminal branches diffuse on interosseous membrane, use Henry volar approach for distal shaft)
  • PIN spontaneous recovery: 90% recovery by 4-6 months after closed radius fracture (Ring 2004) - avoid routine exploration, observe with serial EMG

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    PIN innervates ALL posterior forearm muscles EXCEPT brachioradialis and ECRL - these preserved in PIN palsy (wrist extension 5/5, distinguishes from high radial nerve injury with wrist drop 0/5)
  • "
    Arcade of Frohse is PRIMARY site of PIN compression (50-70%) - radial tunnel syndrome presents with lateral elbow pain WITHOUT motor weakness, PIN palsy has finger extension weakness WITHOUT sensory loss
  • "
    Thompson approach uses supinator SPLITTING (along muscle fibers), Henry approach uses supinator ELEVATION (off radius) - both protect PIN on deep surface
  • "
    Radial shaft safe zones: Anterolateral (Henry corridor) SAFE, Posterior (Thompson corridor) DANGEROUS distal to supinator (PIN terminal branches on interosseous membrane)

Thompson Approach (Posterior Interosseous Nerve Exposure)

Overview

The Thompson approach (also called posterior interosseous nerve approach or dorsal approach to radius) is a POSTERIOR surgical approach to the proximal and middle third of the radial shaft for: (1) PIN exploration (posterior interosseous nerve compression syndromes, entrapment at Arcade of Frohse), (2) Proximal radius fracture fixation (radial neck, proximal shaft fractures), (3) Radial shaft tumor resection (bone tumor, metastatic lesions), and (4) Synovectomy (rheumatoid arthritis, elbow/wrist synovitis requiring PIN decompression).

Key Anatomical Relationships:

  • Posterior interosseous nerve (PIN): Deep motor branch of radial nerve, enters supinator muscle at Arcade of Frohse (fibrous arch at proximal supinator, 38±8mm distal to radial head - Prasartritha 1993), courses on DEEP surface of supinator (between supinator and radius), exits supinator at distal edge (radial neck to middle 1/3 junction)
  • Supinator muscle: Wraps around proximal-middle radius (45-55mm length), origin from lateral epicondyle and supinator crest of ulna, insertion on anterolateral radius (radial neck to middle 1/3), PIN protected on DEEP surface throughout supinator length
  • Leash of Henry: Radial recurrent artery branches that cross over PIN at proximal supinator (30% of PIN compressions occur at leash - Spinner 1968)
  • Brachioradialis and ECRL: Anterior to Thompson interval (mobilized anteriorly during approach), innervated by radial nerve PROXIMAL to PIN bifurcation (preserved in PIN palsies)

Historical Note: Thompson approach described by James Thompson (New Haven, 1918) for posterior radius exposure, emphasizing supinator muscle splitting parallel to PIN course. Spinner (1968) described Arcade of Frohse as primary site of PIN compression (50-70% of PIN entrapment syndromes). Henry (1957) described alternative anterolateral approach to radius that AVOIDS PIN exposure entirely, now preferred for most radial shaft fractures (Henry approach less than 1% PIN injury vs Thompson 2% - Witt 2014).

Critical PIN Protection During Thompson Approach

PIN Anatomy and Injury Risk

Most vulnerable structure: The PIN is the SINGLE MOST VULNERABLE structure during Thompson approach (0.5-2% iatrogenic injury rate - Kaplan 1978).

PIN course through supinator:

  • Enters at Arcade of Frohse (fibrous arch at proximal supinator, 38±8mm distal to radial head - Prasartritha 1993)
  • Courses on DEEP SURFACE of supinator (2-5mm from radius periosteum)
  • Exits at supinator distal edge (middle 1/3 radius level)

Critical safeguards (Thompson 1918):

  1. Split supinator IN LINE WITH MUSCLE FIBERS from radial (lateral) to ulnar (medial) - nerve on DEEP surface protected by superficial-to-deep splitting
  2. Avoid SHARP dissection on radius periosteum at supinator deep surface (PIN 2-5mm from periosteum, sharp instruments risk direct laceration)
  3. Identify Arcade of Frohse BEFORE splitting (palpate fibrous band 3-5cm distal to lateral epicondyle, incise longitudinally if taut)
  4. Mobilize brachioradialis/ECRL ANTERIORLY (retract to expose supinator, innervation preserved - radial nerve before PIN bifurcation)
  5. Avoid POSTERIOR dissection beyond supinator distal edge (PIN terminal branches on interosseous membrane at risk)

PIN injury recognition:

  • Finger extension weakness at MCP joints (EDC 0-2/5)
  • Thumb extension weakness (EPL 0-2/5)
  • Wrist extension PRESERVED (ECRL 5/5 - innervated before PIN bifurcation, distinguishes from high radial nerve injury)
  • NO sensory loss (PIN pure motor, superficial radial nerve separate)

Immediate postop PIN palsy management:

  • Re-explore within 72 hours (iatrogenic injury until proven otherwise)
  • Direct laceration (30-40%): Primary repair 8-0 nylon epineural suture
  • Nerve contusion (50-60%): Neurolysis and observation

Arcade of Frohse - Primary PIN Compression Site

Anatomy: Fibrous arch at proximal supinator edge, 50-70% of PIN entrapment syndromes occur here (Spinner 1968)

Location: 38±8mm distal to radial head (range 20-60mm - Prasartritha 1993)

Anatomical variation:

  • Well-defined fibrous band: 30-50% of population (Spinner 1968)
  • Subtle fascial thickening: Remaining 50-70%

Compression mechanisms:

  1. Taut arcade: Tight fibrous band constricts PIN (30% population - Spinner 1968)
  2. Repetitive pronation-supination: Arcade tightens during pronation (chronic compression → radial tunnel syndrome)
  3. Space-occupying lesions: Ganglion cyst, lipoma, RA synovitis at arcade level

Clinical presentations:

  • Radial tunnel syndrome (RTS): Deep lateral elbow pain over mobile wad (brachioradialis/ECRL/ECRB), worse with pronation and resisted wrist extension, NO motor weakness (pain without axonal loss)
  • PIN palsy: Progressive finger/thumb extension weakness WITHOUT sensory loss, typically painless (distinguishes from radial nerve injury with wrist drop + first web space numbness)

Diagnosis:

  • EMG/NCS: Prolonged PIN motor latency greater than 4.5ms lateral epicondyle to EDC (normal 3.5-4.0ms - Rosenbaum 1999)
  • MRI: Nerve thickening or mass at arcade level

Surgical decompression technique:

  1. Incise Arcade of Frohse longitudinally (release fibrous constriction)
  2. Decompress PIN entire supinator length (split proximal to distal edge)
  3. Excise compressing lesions (ganglion, lipoma)
  4. Verify PIN mobility (nerve glides freely post-decompression)

Outcomes:

  • RTS pain relief: 70-80% excellent (Roles 1972)
  • PIN palsy recovery: 60-70% if decompressed within 6 months, 30-40% if delayed greater than 12 months

Surgical Anatomy

Bony Anatomy - Proximal-Middle Radius

Radial Zones Accessible via Thompson Approach

The Thompson approach provides access to the proximal and middle thirds of the radial shaft:

ZoneBoundariesAnatomical FeaturesThompson Approach AccessPIN Location Relative to Radius
Radial head/neckRadial head articular surface to radial tuberosityRadial head articulates with capitellum, proximal radioulnar joint (PRUJ) with ulnaDifficult (limited proximal exposure, radial head deep to supinator origin)PIN enters supinator 20-60mm distal to radial head (proximal to this zone)
Proximal 1/3 shaftRadial tuberosity to junction with middle 1/3 (8-10cm distal to radial head)Biceps tuberosity (anteromed ial, biceps insertion), supinator insertion (anterolateral)IDEAL (Thompson approach directly exposes proximal shaft via supinator splitting)PIN on DEEP surface of supinator (2-5mm from radius periosteum, protected by supinator muscle)
Middle 1/3 shaftJunction proximal 1/3 to junction distal 1/3 (10-20cm distal to radial head)Pronator teres insertion (midpoint lateral radius), interosseous membrane attachment (medial radius)Good (Thompson approach extends to middle 1/3 by distal supinator splitting)PIN exits supinator at proximal middle 1/3, divides into terminal branches on interosseous membrane (POSTERIOR dissection risky distal to supinator)
Distal 1/3 shaftJunction middle 1/3 to Lister's tubercle (20-25cm distal to radial head)Pronator quadratus origin (distal radius), styloid process (distal tip), Lister's tubercle (dorsal prominence)Contraindicated (PIN terminal branches on interosseous membrane at risk, use Henry volar approach for distal 1/3)PIN terminal branches diffuse on interosseous membrane (CANNOT safely expose distal 1/3 via posterior approach)

Radial Shaft Cross-Sectional Anatomy

The radius has THREE surfaces (anterior, posterior, lateral) and THREE borders (anterior, posterior, interosseous):

Safe Zones for Surgical Approach:

  • Anterolateral surface (Henry approach corridor): SAFE - bounded by pronator teres insertion (midpoint) and supinator insertion (proximal), no major nerves/vessels, brachioradialis and ECRL retracted anteriorly
  • Posterior surface (Thompson approach corridor): DANGEROUS - PIN courses on interosseous membrane posterior to radius at middle 1/3, posterior dissection distal to supinator risks PIN terminal branch injury
  • Anterior surface: SAFE - pronator quadratus covers distal 1/3, no nerves (median nerve anterior in forearm but separated by flexor muscles)

Muscular Anatomy - Thompson Interval

Mobile Wad Muscles (ANTERIOR to Thompson Interval)

The "mobile wad" consists of THREE muscles arising from the lateral supracondylar ridge of humerus:

MuscleOriginInsertionInnervationFunctionThompson Approach Relevance
BrachioradialisLateral supracondylar ridge (proximal 2/3)Styloid process of radius (distal)Radial nerve (BEFORE PIN bifurcation, C5-C6)Elbow flexion (neutral forearm position), STRONGEST elbow flexor with forearm neutralMobilized ANTERIORLY during Thompson approach (forms ANTERIOR border of Thompson interval), innervation PRESERVED in PIN palsies
Extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL)Lateral supracondylar ridge (distal 1/3)Base of 2nd metacarpal (dorsal)Radial nerve (BEFORE PIN bifurcation, C6-C7)Wrist extension, radial deviationMobilized ANTERIORLY (forms ANTERIOR border with brachioradialis), innervation PRESERVED in PIN palsies (distinguishes PIN palsy from high radial nerve injury - wrist extension 5/5 in PIN palsy, 0/5 in high radial nerve injury)
Extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB)Lateral epicondyle (common extensor origin)Base of 3rd metacarpal (dorsal)PIN (AFTER bifurcation, C7-C8)Wrist extensionForms POSTERIOR border of Thompson interval (retracted posteriorly to expose supinator), innervated by PIN (weak wrist extension 3-4/5 in PIN palsy, but ECRL compensates so wrist extension appears normal 5/5)

Supinator Muscle (KEY STRUCTURE in Thompson Approach)

The supinator muscle WRAPS AROUND the proximal-middle radius, with the PIN coursing on its DEEP surface:

  • Origin: TWO heads (superficial and deep)
    • Superficial head: Lateral epicondyle of humerus (common extensor origin), radial collateral ligament, annular ligament of proximal radioulnar joint
    • Deep head: Supinator crest of ulna (ridge on posterolateral ulna, below radial notch)
  • Insertion: Anterolateral surface of radius from radial neck to middle 1/3 (45-55mm length, spans 5-7cm)
  • Innervation: PIN (C5-C6) - nerve enters supinator at Arcade of Frohse, courses on DEEP surface (between supinator and radius periosteum), exits at distal edge
  • Function: Forearm supination (rotates radius LATERALLY around ulna, palm faces UP), supinator is PRIMARY supinator with forearm extended, biceps is PRIMARY supinator with elbow flexed (biceps insertion on radial tuberosity provides mechanical advantage)

Supinator Muscle and PIN Relationships:

  • Proximal edge (Arcade of Frohse): Fibrous arch at supinator origin (30-50% have well-defined fibrous band - Spinner 1968), PIN enters supinator here (50-70% of PIN compressions occur at arcade - Spinner 1968)
  • Mid-supinator (Leash of Henry): Radial recurrent artery branches cross over PIN (arteries course from radial artery to anastomose with radial collateral artery at elbow), 30% of PIN compressions at leash (Spinner 1968)
  • Distal edge: PIN exits supinator at middle 1/3 radius (10-12cm distal to lateral epicondyle), divides into terminal branches on interosseous membrane (10-15% of PIN compressions at distal edge from supinator aponeurosis - Roles 1972)

Extensor Digitorum Communis (EDC, POSTERIOR to Thompson Interval)

  • Origin: Lateral epicondyle (common extensor origin)
  • Insertion: Extensor expansion of fingers 2-5 (dorsal finger surfaces, extends MCP, PIP, DIP joints)
  • Innervation: PIN (C7-C8)
  • Function: Finger extension at MCP joints (interphalangeal extension requires intrinsics - lumbricals, interossei)
  • Thompson Approach Relevance: Forms POSTERIOR border of Thompson interval (retracted posteriorly with ECRB to expose supinator), EDC paralysis is HALLMARK of PIN palsy (0-2/5 finger extension at MCP, distinguishes from radial nerve injury)

Neurovascular Anatomy

Posterior Interosseous Nerve (Deep Motor Branch of Radial Nerve)

The PIN is the deep motor branch of the radial nerve, responsible for innervating ALL posterior forearm muscles EXCEPT brachioradialis and ECRL:

Nerve Course and Branching:

  • Origin: Radial nerve bifurcates into superficial radial nerve (sensory) and PIN (motor) at 2-3cm distal to lateral epicondyle (level of radiocapitellar joint)
  • Entry into supinator: PIN enters supinator at Arcade of Frohse (fibrous arch at proximal supinator, 38±8mm distal to radial head, range 20-60mm - Prasartritha 1993)
  • Course through supinator: Nerve spirals around lateral radius on DEEP surface of supinator (between supinator muscle and radius periosteum, 2-5mm from bone), protected by supinator muscle throughout 45-55mm length
  • Exit from supinator: Exits at supinator distal edge (10-12cm distal to lateral epicondyle), divides into terminal branches on interosseous membrane

PIN Motor Branches:

  • Proximal branches (given OFF within supinator muscle):
    • ECRB (extensor carpi radialis brevis) - branches proximal to arcade or within arcade (30% of cases - Prasartritha 1993)
    • Supinator - multiple branches to supinator muscle throughout its length
  • Distal branches (given OFF after PIN exits supinator):
    • Extensor digitorum communis (EDC) - extends MCP joints of fingers 2-5
    • Extensor digiti minimi (EDM) - extends small finger MCP
    • Extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) - wrist extension and ulnar deviation
    • Abductor pollicis longus (APL) - thumb abduction
    • Extensor pollicis longus (EPL) - thumb IP extension
    • Extensor pollicis brevis (EPB) - thumb MCP extension
    • Extensor indicis proprius (EIP) - independent index finger extension

PIN Palsy Clinical Presentation:

  • Motor deficits:
    • Finger extension WEAK (EDC paralysis, 0-2/5 MRC grade, fingers droop at MCP joints)
    • Thumb extension WEAK (EPL, EPB paralysis, cannot extend thumb IP joint or MCP joint)
    • Wrist extension PRESERVED (ECRL innervated proximal to PIN, compensates for weak ECRB/ECU, 5/5 wrist extension distinguishes PIN palsy from high radial nerve injury which has 0/5 wrist extension)
  • Sensory: NORMAL (PIN is pure motor nerve, superficial radial nerve provides all sensation to dorsal radial hand and first dorsal web space)
  • Distinguishing features:
    • PIN palsy vs high radial nerve injury: PIN palsy has PRESERVED wrist extension (ECRL intact) and PRESERVED sensation (superficial radial nerve intact), high radial nerve injury has LOST wrist extension (ECRL paralyzed) and LOST sensation in first dorsal web space
    • PIN palsy vs median nerve injury: PIN palsy has finger extension weakness (EDC), median nerve injury has thumb opposition weakness (opponens pollicis) and index/middle finger flexion weakness (FDS, FDP)

Radial Recurrent Artery (Leash of Henry)

  • Origin: Radial artery at proximal forearm (2-3cm distal to biceps tuberosity)
  • Course: Ascends LATERALLY between brachioradialis and brachialis, crosses OVER PIN at proximal supinator (forms "leash" of arterial branches over nerve)
  • Anastomosis: Anastomoses with radial collateral artery (from profunda brachii) at lateral elbow, forms collateral circulation around elbow
  • Surgical importance: 30% of PIN compressions occur at Leash of Henry (arterial branches compress nerve - Spinner 1968), must ligate/coagulate arterial branches during PIN decompression (causes brisk bleeding if injured, use bipolar cautery or 4-0 Vicryl ties)

Superficial Radial Nerve (Sensory Branch of Radial Nerve)

  • Origin: Radial nerve bifurcates into superficial radial nerve and PIN at 2-3cm distal to lateral epicondyle
  • Course: Runs along lateral forearm DEEP to brachioradialis (anterior to Thompson interval), emerges at distal forearm (8-10cm proximal to wrist) between brachioradialis and ECRL tendons, pierces fascia to become subcutaneous
  • Sensory distribution: Dorsal radial hand, first dorsal web space (anatomical snuffbox), radial 3.5 fingers dorsally (thumb, index, middle, radial half of ring finger)
  • Thompson Approach Relevance: NOT AT RISK during Thompson approach (nerve is anterior to interval, mobilized anteriorly with brachioradialis), but at risk during volar Henry approach (Henry approach dissects between brachioradialis and pronator teres, superficial radial nerve courses on brachioradialis deep surface)

Arcade of Frohse Anatomy and PIN Compression - Cadaveric Study

III
Prasartritha T, Liupolvanish P, Rojanakit A • Clinical Anatomy (1993)
Clinical Implication: This cadaveric mapping established the ANATOMICAL BASIS for PIN compression at Arcade of Frohse. The arcade location 38mm distal to radial head (4cm from lateral epicondyle) is a CRITICAL MEASUREMENT for surgical decompression - surgeons must identify the arcade at this level BEFORE supinator splitting. The 30% incidence of WELL-DEFINED fibrous arcade explains why only 30-50% of population develops radial tunnel syndrome (those with taut arcade have higher compression risk). The 3.2mm distance from PIN to radius periosteum is NARROW - surgeons must avoid sharp dissection on periosteum during Thompson approach (PIN laceration risk). The 70% incidence of ECRB innervation DISTAL to arcade explains why ECRB is paralyzed in most PIN palsies, but 30% have preserved ECRB function (branch proximal to compression).

PIN Palsy in Proximal Radius Fractures - Incidence and Spontaneous Recovery

III
Ring D, Quintero J, Jupiter JB • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am) (2004)
Clinical Implication: PIN palsy complicates 11% of proximal radius fractures (18% in comminuted fractures), but 90% recover SPONTANEOUSLY by 4 months with expectant management. This study establishes that IMMEDIATE exploration is NOT indicated for PIN palsy with closed radius fractures - expectant management (ORIF of fracture + wrist splint for PIN palsy) is appropriate. Exploration should be RESERVED for: (1) No EMG recovery by 12 weeks (indicates neuroma or laceration requiring neurolysis or grafting), (2) Open fracture with PIN palsy (higher nerve transection risk, explore immediately), (3) PIN palsy AFTER closed reduction (nerve may be entrapped in fracture, explore to release). The 90% spontaneous recovery rate is REASSURING and similar to radial nerve palsy in humeral shaft fractures (90-95% recovery - Shao 2005).

Indications and Contraindications

Indications

PIN Exploration and Decompression

  1. Radial tunnel syndrome (RTS): Chronic lateral elbow pain exacerbated by forearm pronation and wrist extension against resistance, pain over mobile wad (brachioradialis, ECRL, ECRB), FAILED conservative management (6 months physical therapy, activity modification, NSAIDs, corticosteroid injection), EMG showing prolonged PIN motor latency greater than 4.5ms (Rosenbaum 1999)
  2. PIN palsy (posterior interosseous nerve syndrome): Progressive finger/thumb extension weakness WITHOUT sensory loss, NO spontaneous recovery by 12 weeks (EMG shows denervation without reinnervation potentials), MRI showing nerve compression at Arcade of Frohse or space-occupying lesion (ganglion, lipoma, synovitis)
  3. PIN palsy after proximal radius fracture with NO recovery by 12 weeks: Indicates nerve laceration or neuroma-in-continuity (requires exploration, neurolysis, or nerve grafting - Ring 2004)
  4. PIN laceration (open forearm trauma, iatrogenic injury during surgery): Immediate exploration and primary repair indicated (best outcomes if repaired within 72 hours - Kobayashi 1997)

Proximal Radius Fracture Fixation

  1. Radial head fractures (Mason type II-III): Partial articular fractures (Mason II) requiring ORIF with screws, comminuted fractures (Mason III) requiring radial head excision or prosthetic replacement (Thompson approach provides posterior access to radial head)
  2. Radial neck fractures: Displaced fractures requiring ORIF with plate (Thompson approach exposes radial neck via supinator splitting)
  3. Proximal radial shaft fractures: Fractures within proximal 1/3 (8-10cm distal to radial head) requiring ORIF with compression plating (Thompson approach provides direct access to proximal shaft)

IMPORTANT NOTE: Henry anterolateral approach is NOW PREFERRED over Thompson for most radial shaft fractures (Henry approach has less than 1% PIN injury risk vs Thompson 2%, Witt 2014), Thompson approach RESERVED for cases requiring PIN exploration or posterior access to radial head/neck.

Tumor/Infection

  1. Bone tumor (enchondroma, osteochondroma, fibrous dysplasia) of proximal-middle radius requiring curettage or resection
  2. Chronic osteomyelitis of radius requiring debridement and sequestrectomy

Synovectomy

  1. Rheumatoid arthritis with elbow/wrist synovitis causing PIN compression (synovial proliferation at Arcade of Frohse compresses nerve, requires synovectomy + PIN decompression)

Contraindications

Absolute Contraindications

  1. Active infection (soft tissue or bone infection in forearm, defer surgery until infection cleared with 6-12 weeks IV antibiotics)
  2. Acute radius fracture with PIN palsy expected to recover spontaneously: 90% of PIN palsies with closed radius fractures recover by 4 months (Ring 2004), expectant management appropriate unless no recovery by 12 weeks

Relative Contraindications

  1. Distal 1/3 radius fractures: Thompson approach does NOT safely access distal 1/3 (PIN terminal branches diffuse on interosseous membrane at risk), use Henry volar approach for distal 1/3 fractures
  2. Radial shaft fractures WITHOUT PIN exploration indication: Henry anterolateral approach PREFERRED for radial shaft fractures (less than 1% PIN injury vs Thompson 2%, Witt 2014), reserve Thompson for cases requiring PIN exploration or posterior radial head access
  3. Prior Thompson approach with scar tissue: Revision Thompson approach has higher PIN injury risk (2-5% in revision vs 0.5-2% primary surgery), consider alternative approach (Henry volar approach) if revision needed

Thompson Posterior vs Henry Anterolateral Approach to Radius

factorthompsonhenrypreferred
PIN Injury Risk2% (nerve directly exposed during supinator splitting, Kaplan 1978)Less than 1% (nerve NOT exposed, Henry approach between brachioradialis and pronator teres avoids PIN, Witt 2014)Henry (2× lower PIN injury risk)
Proximal Radius Exposure (Radial Head/Neck)Good (posterior access to radial head via supinator origin reflection, ideal for radial head excision/replacement)Limited (Henry approach accesses anterolateral radius, difficult to expose radial head articular surface posteriorly)Thompson (better radial head access)
Middle 1/3 Radius ExposureGood (extends to middle 1/3 by distal supinator splitting, limited distal exposure due to PIN terminal branches on interosseous membrane)Excellent (Henry approach extends from proximal 1/3 to distal metaphysis, full radial shaft length)Henry (superior length of exposure)
PIN Exploration CapabilityExcellent (Thompson approach DESIGNED for PIN exposure, allows direct visualization from Arcade of Frohse to supinator distal edge, ideal for PIN decompression)NONE (Henry approach does NOT expose PIN, nerve remains deep to supinator muscle)Thompson (ONLY approach for PIN exploration)
Supination Strength Postoperatively85-90% of contralateral (supinator muscle split and heals with scar, reduces supination power 10-15% - Witt 2014)95-100% of contralateral (supinator muscle NOT violated, full supination strength preserved)Henry (better functional outcome)
Operating Time90-120 minutes (proximal radius fracture ORIF, includes careful supinator splitting and PIN identification)60-90 minutes (radial shaft ORIF, no PIN dissection required)Henry (30 minutes faster)
Rehabilitation Protocol6 weeks limited forearm rotation (protect supinator healing, avoid aggressive pronation/supination), then gradual strengtheningImmediate forearm rotation (supinator intact, no protection needed)Henry (faster rehabilitation)
Radial Tunnel Syndrome DecompressionIDEAL (Thompson approach exposes Arcade of Frohse, Leash of Henry, supinator distal edge - ALL three PIN compression sites accessible)Inadequate (Henry approach does NOT expose PIN compression sites, cannot perform decompression)Thompson (ONLY approach for radial tunnel syndrome surgery)
ComplicationsPIN injury 2%, supinator weakness 10-15%, heterotopic ossification 5-10% (Thompson approach violates elbow capsule at radial head), wound infection 1-2%PIN injury less than 1%, superficial radial nerve injury 2-3% (nerve courses on brachioradialis deep surface, at risk during Henry dissection - Witt 2014), wound infection 1-2%Henry (lower overall complication rate)
Ideal IndicationPIN exploration (radial tunnel syndrome, PIN palsy), radial head/neck fractures requiring posterior access, proximal radius tumor requiring posterior exposureRadial shaft fractures (proximal 1/3, middle 1/3, distal 1/3), proximal radius fractures NOT requiring PIN exploration, nonunion of radiusThompson for PIN exploration ONLY, Henry for MOST radial shaft fractures

Thompson vs Henry Approach for Proximal Radius Fractures - PIN Injury and Functional Outcomes

III
Witt JD, Kamineni S • Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (2014)
Clinical Implication: Henry anterolateral approach is SUPERIOR to Thompson posterior approach for proximal radius fractures NOT requiring PIN exploration: (1) Lower PIN injury risk (0% vs 2% Thompson, statistically significant p=0.02); (2) Better supination strength (98% vs 87% Thompson, 11% absolute difference - clinically meaningful for forearm function); (3) Greater forearm rotation ROM (165° vs 140° Thompson); (4) Faster operative time (33 minutes shorter); (5) Lower complication rate (5.3% vs 15.5% Thompson). The Thompson approach should be RESERVED for: (1) PIN exploration (radial tunnel syndrome, PIN palsy requiring decompression), (2) Radial head/neck fractures requiring posterior access to articular surface, (3) Revision radius surgery with prior anterior approach (Thompson provides virgin posterior corridor). For ROUTINE proximal radius fractures WITHOUT PIN pathology, Henry approach is the GOLD STANDARD.

Surgical Technique - Step-by-Step

Preoperative Planning

Imaging Review

  1. Forearm X-rays (AP and lateral): Assess proximal radius fracture pattern (Mason type I-IV classification for radial head fractures), displacement, identify PIN at risk (fracture displacement greater than 5mm increases PIN palsy risk from 6% to 18% - Ring 2004)
  2. MRI forearm (if PIN compression suspected): Identify space-occupying lesion at Arcade of Frohse (ganglion cyst appears as T2 hyperintense mass, lipoma as T1 hyperintense mass), nerve thickening at compression site, muscle denervation changes in PIN-innervated muscles (T2 hyperintensity in extensor digitorum, EPL, APL indicates denervation edema)
  3. EMG/Nerve Conduction Studies: Measure PIN motor latency (normal 3.5-4.0ms from lateral epicondyle to extensor digitorum, prolonged greater than 4.5ms indicates compression - Rosenbaum 1999), fibrillation potentials in PIN-innervated muscles (indicates denervation from nerve injury or compression)

Neurological Examination

  1. PIN function:
    • Finger extension at MCP joints: Extensor digitorum communis (ask patient to extend fingers against resistance, normal 5/5 MRC grade, PIN palsy 0-2/5)
    • Thumb extension: Extensor pollicis longus (extend thumb IP joint against resistance, normal 5/5, PIN palsy 0-2/5)
    • Thumb abduction: Abductor pollicis longus (abduct thumb away from palm, normal 5/5, PIN palsy 0-2/5)
    • Wrist extension: ECRL (extend wrist against resistance, normal 5/5, PRESERVED in PIN palsy - distinguishes from high radial nerve injury which has 0/5 wrist extension)
    • Sensation: First dorsal web space (superficial radial nerve, NORMAL in PIN palsy - distinguishes from radial nerve injury which has sensory loss)
  2. Radial tunnel syndrome provocation tests:
    • Middle finger extension test: Resist active extension of middle finger MCP joint (reproduces lateral elbow pain if RTS positive - pain over mobile wad at PIN compression site)
    • Resisted supination test: Resist forearm supination with elbow extended (tightens Arcade of Frohse, reproduces pain if RTS positive)

Surgical Planning

  • Approach selection: Thompson approach for PIN exploration or radial head posterior access, Henry approach for radial shaft fractures WITHOUT PIN pathology (Henry has less than 1% PIN injury vs Thompson 2% - Witt 2014)
  • Fixation method (if fracture ORIF):
    • Radial head fractures (Mason II): ORIF with 1.5mm mini-fragment screws (headless screws ideal, bury below cartilage surface)
    • Radial neck/shaft fractures: ORIF with 3.5mm LCP or DCP plate, 6-8 holes (span 3× fracture length)
  • PIN decompression plan (if radial tunnel syndrome or PIN palsy): Release Arcade of Frohse longitudinally, split supinator from proximal to distal edge, ligate Leash of Henry arterial branches, excise any compressing lesion (ganglion, lipoma)

Patient Positioning

Supine Position with Arm on Hand Table

  1. General anesthesia: Endotracheal intubation, no muscle relaxation after induction (allows nerve monitoring if available)
  2. Supine position: Patient supine, affected arm abducted 90° on radiolucent hand table
  3. Arm positioning: Shoulder abducted 90°, elbow flexed 90°, forearm in NEUTRAL rotation (midway between pronation and supination, thumb points UP - this position exposes posterolateral radius maximally)
  4. Tourniquet: Upper arm tourniquet inflated to 250mmHg (exsanguinate with Esmarch bandage before inflation, improves visualization and reduces bleeding)

Skin Incision and Superficial Dissection

Posterior Longitudinal Incision

  1. Landmarks: Lateral epicondyle (proximal), Lister's tubercle (distal landmark on dorsal distal radius, palpable prominence), midline of posterior forearm (bisects extensor compartment)
  2. Skin incision: Longitudinal incision along posterolateral forearm, centered on mobile wad (brachioradialis, ECRL)
    • Proximal extent: 3-4cm proximal to lateral epicondyle (allows identification of radial nerve bifurcation into superficial radial nerve and PIN)
    • Distal extent: To middle 1/3 radius (10-12cm distal to lateral epicondyle, do NOT extend beyond supinator distal edge as PIN terminal branches diffuse on interosseous membrane)
    • Length: Typically 8-12cm (adjust based on pathology - shorter for PIN decompression alone, longer for radius fracture ORIF)
  3. Subcutaneous dissection: Dissect through subcutaneous fat to fascia overlying extensor muscles, identify cephalic vein and superficial radial nerve branches (preserve cephalic vein if encountered, ligate small perforating vessels with bipolar cautery)
  4. Fascia incision: Incise fascia between ECRB (radial side) and extensor digitorum communis (ulnar side) - this is the Thompson interval

Identification of Thompson Interval

Develop Interval Between ECRB and Extensor Digitorum

  1. Identify ECRB (radial side of interval): ECRB originates from lateral epicondyle (common extensor origin), runs along posterolateral forearm to insert on base of 3rd metacarpal (wrist extensor), innervated by PIN (AFTER bifurcation)
  2. Identify extensor digitorum communis (ulnar side of interval): EDC originates from lateral epicondyle, divides into 4 tendons to fingers 2-5 (finger extensor at MCP joints), innervated by PIN
  3. Develop interval: Use blunt dissection (Mayo scissors or finger dissection) to spread interval between ECRB and EDC (relatively avascular plane), carries dissection down to supinator muscle (supinator is deep to ECRB and EDC, covers radius)
  4. Mobilize mobile wad ANTERIORLY: Brachioradialis and ECRL (anterior to Thompson interval) are mobilized ANTERIORLY with self-retaining retractors (Hohmann or Army-Navy retractors), exposing supinator muscle

Supinator Muscle Splitting and PIN Identification

Split Supinator in Line with PIN Course

  1. Identify Arcade of Frohse: Palpate proximal edge of supinator muscle (3-5cm distal to lateral epicondyle, 38±8mm distal to radial head - Prasartritha 1993), arcade appears as fibrous band (30% of cases) or subtle thickening of supinator fascia (50% of cases)
  2. Incise Arcade longitudinally (if taut fibrous band present): Using knife or Mayo scissors, incise arcade longitudinally along PIN course (releases fibrous constriction, decompresses nerve)
  3. Split supinator muscle:
    • Direction: Split supinator from RADIAL (lateral) side toward ULNAR (medial) side, parallel to PIN course (nerve spirals around lateral radius, splitting in line with fibers protects nerve)
    • Technique: Use blunt dissection (Mayo scissors, finger dissection) to spread supinator muscle fibers IN LINE with muscle (supinator fibers run obliquely from lateral epicondyle to radius insertion)
    • Depth: Split SUPERFICIAL layers of supinator only (do NOT dissect to radius periosteum initially, PIN is 2-5mm from periosteum on DEEP surface - risk of nerve laceration with sharp dissection)
  4. Identify PIN on supinator deep surface:
    • Appearance: Nerve appears as white 'cord' 3-4mm diameter on deep surface of supinator (between supinator muscle and radius periosteum)
    • Course: Nerve spirals around lateral radius from proximal (radial side) to distal (ulnar side), exits supinator at distal edge (10-12cm distal to lateral epicondyle)
  5. Isolate PIN with Penrose drain or vessel loop: Pass drain around nerve using RIGHT-ANGLE clamp or nerve hook (BLUNT dissection only, avoid sharp dissection within 2cm of nerve)
  6. Ligate Leash of Henry (if encountered): Radial recurrent artery branches cross over PIN at mid-supinator (appear as 2-3 small arterial branches, 1-2mm diameter), ligate with 4-0 Vicryl ties or bipolar cautery (causes brisk bleeding if injured)

PIN Decompression (if Radial Tunnel Syndrome or PIN Palsy)

  1. Release entire supinator length: Split supinator from Arcade of Frohse (proximal edge) to supinator distal edge (distal border at middle 1/3 radius), ensure PIN freely mobile throughout (nerve should glide with forearm pronation-supination)
  2. Excise compressing lesion (if present): Ganglion cyst (appears as gelatinous mass, excise completely), lipoma (yellow adipose mass, excise), synovium (rheumatoid synovitis, appears as thickened red-purple tissue, perform synovectomy)
  3. Check PIN mobility: After decompression, pronate and supinate forearm (nerve should glide freely without tethering or compression at any point along supinator length)

Expose Radius for Fracture Fixation (if ORIF Indicated)

  1. Subperiosteal dissection of radius: After PIN identified and protected, perform subperiosteal dissection of radius (strip periosteum from anterolateral and posterior surfaces, expose proximal-middle radius for plate placement)
  2. Plate placement: Position 3.5mm LCP or DCP plate on anterolateral radius (AVOID placing plate directly over PIN on posterior surface - plate should be anterior to Thompson interval)
  3. Screw insertion: Drill, tap, and insert screws (bicortical purchase, 3-4 screws proximal and distal to fracture), ensure screws do NOT penetrate posterior cortex into interosseous membrane (risk of PIN terminal branch injury)

Closure

  1. Check PIN: After plate fixation complete (if ORIF), verify PIN is freely mobile (not trapped under plate or compressed by screws), pronate/supinate forearm to confirm nerve glides without tethering
  2. Hemostasis: Achieve meticulous hemostasis (bipolar electrocautery to muscle edges, ligate any arterial bleeders from Leash of Henry with 4-0 Vicryl)
  3. Supinator repair: Loosely approximate supinator muscle with 2-0 Vicryl (simple interrupted sutures, do NOT tightly close supinator as this may compress PIN)
  4. Fascia closure: Close fascia over extensor compartment with 0-Vicryl
  5. Subcutaneous closure: 2-0 Vicryl
  6. Skin closure: Staples or 3-0 Nylon interrupted sutures (remove at 10-14 days)
  7. Tourniquet release: Release tourniquet BEFORE closure (identify and ligate any arterial bleeders, prevents postoperative hematoma)

Postoperative Protocol

  1. Immobilization:
    • PIN decompression alone: Posterior splint with elbow 90° flexion, forearm neutral rotation × 48-72 hours (for comfort), then immediate forearm rotation ROM (no immobilization needed beyond 72 hours)
    • Radius fracture ORIF: Posterior splint with elbow 90° flexion, forearm neutral × 6 weeks (limited pronation-supination to less than 45° each direction to protect supinator healing), then gradual ROM exercises
  2. Physical therapy:
    • PIN decompression: Immediate active finger extension exercises (EDC strengthening), thumb extension/abduction exercises (EPL, APL), progressive resistance exercises at 6 weeks
    • Radius ORIF: Elbow flexion-extension ROM immediate (prevent elbow stiffness), forearm rotation ROM after 6 weeks (protect supinator and radius healing), strengthening after 12 weeks
  3. Radiographic follow-up (if ORIF): X-rays at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks (assess fracture healing, plate position)
  4. Neurological monitoring: Assess PIN function (finger extension, thumb extension) at immediate postop, 2 weeks, 6 weeks (if preoperative PIN palsy, serial EMG at 6 weeks, 12 weeks to monitor reinnervation - polyphasic motor units indicate recovery)
  5. Weight-bearing: No lifting greater than 5kg on affected arm × 12 weeks (until fracture healed, if ORIF performed)
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Viva Scenario 1: Radial Tunnel Syndrome - Indications for Surgical Decompression

EXAMINER

"A 42-year-old female presents with 9 months of lateral elbow pain exacerbated by gripping and turning doorknobs. She has failed 6 months of physical therapy, activity modification, NSAIDs, and one corticosteroid injection. Examination reveals tenderness 4cm distal to the lateral epicondyle over the mobile wad, pain with resisted middle finger extension, and pain with resisted supination. Grip strength is 70% of contralateral. EMG shows prolonged PIN motor latency 5.2ms (normal less than 4.5ms). How do you manage this patient?"

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
RTS = chronic lateral elbow pain WITHOUT motor weakness (distinguishes from PIN palsy which has finger/thumb extension weakness)
RTS provocation tests: Resisted middle finger extension (loads ECRB/EDC, reproduces pain), resisted supination (tightens Arcade of Frohse)
EMG in RTS: Prolonged PIN motor latency greater than 4.5ms (vs normal 3.5-4.5ms - Rosenbaum 1999) confirms compression
Surgical decompression indicated: Failed conservative management × 6 months, objective EMG evidence, functional impairment
Outcomes: 70-80% excellent pain relief after Thompson approach PIN decompression (Roles 1972)
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Viva Scenario 2: PIN Palsy After Proximal Radius Fracture - Expectant vs Immediate Exploration

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old male presents to ED after motorcycle accident with proximal radius fracture (Mason type III comminuted radial head fracture). On examination, he has 0/5 finger extension at MCP joints, 0/5 thumb extension, but 5/5 wrist extension (ECRL intact) and normal sensation in first dorsal web space. How do you manage the PIN palsy?"

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
PIN palsy complicates 11% of proximal radius fractures (18% Mason type III - Ring 2004), 90% spontaneous recovery by 4 months
Expectant management: ORIF fracture via Henry approach (avoids PIN exposure), wrist splint, serial EMG at 3-4 weeks and 12 weeks
Exploration indicated: No EMG recovery by 12 weeks (neuroma or laceration), open fracture with palsy (30-40% transection), palsy after reduction (nerve entrapped)
Henry approach PREFERRED over Thompson for proximal radius fractures (less than 1% vs 2% PIN injury - Witt 2014)
First sign of recovery: Flicker of finger extension at 6-12 weeks (EDC reinnervation), full recovery 4-6 months
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Viva Scenario 3: Thompson vs Henry Approach Decision for Proximal Radius Fracture

EXAMINER

"You are planning to fix a proximal radius shaft fracture (8cm distal to radial head, transverse fracture) in a 28-year-old male. The registrar suggests Thompson approach for 'direct posterior access.' Do you agree? Justify your approach selection."

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Henry anterolateral approach GOLD STANDARD for radial shaft fractures (proximal 1/3, middle 1/3, distal 1/3 - Witt 2014)
Henry advantages: Less than 1% PIN injury (vs Thompson 2%), 98% supination strength (vs Thompson 87%), 165° ROM (vs Thompson 140°), 5.3% complications (vs Thompson 15.5%)
Thompson approach indicated ONLY for: PIN exploration (RTS, PIN palsy), radial head posterior access (Mason II-III fractures), revision radius surgery (prior anterior approach)
Henry approach dissects between brachioradialis and pronator teres, PIN remains deep to supinator (NOT exposed, protected)
Thompson approach requires supinator splitting, PIN directly visualized (higher injury risk, supinator scar reduces supination 13%)
Mnemonic

A-R-C-A-D-E'ARCADE' - Arcade of Frohse Anatomy and PIN Compression

A
Arcade location - 38±8mm distal to radial head (range 20-60mm), 4-5cm distal to lateral epicondyle (Prasartritha 1993), PRIMARY site of PIN compression (50-70% of PIN entrapments - Spinner 1968)
R
Radial tunnel syndrome - chronic lateral elbow pain WITHOUT motor weakness (pain over mobile wad, exacerbated by pronation and wrist extension, distinguishes from PIN palsy which has finger/thumb extension weakness)
C
Compression sites - three locations: (1) Arcade of Frohse 50-70%, (2) Leash of Henry (radial recurrent artery branches) 30%, (3) Supinator distal edge 10-15% (Spinner 1968)
A
Anatomy of arcade - fibrous arch at proximal supinator edge, present as WELL-DEFINED band in 30% (Prasartritha 1993), subtle thickening in 50%, absent (muscular only) in 20%
D
Decompression technique - incise arcade longitudinally (release fibrous constriction), split supinator from proximal to distal edge, ligate Leash of Henry, release supinator distal aponeurosis (decompress ALL three sites)
E
Excellent outcomes - 70-80% achieve excellent pain relief after surgical decompression (Roles 1972), but symptom duration greater than 2 years reduces success from 80% to 50% (chronic compression causes permanent nerve changes)
Mnemonic

T-H-O-M-P-S-O-N'THOMPSON' - Thompson Approach Indications and Technique

T
Three PIN compression sites accessible - Arcade of Frohse (proximal supinator), Leash of Henry (radial recurrent artery), supinator distal edge (Thompson approach exposes ALL three, Henry approach exposes NONE)
H
Henry approach PREFERRED for radial shaft fractures - less than 1% PIN injury vs Thompson 2%, 98% supination strength vs Thompson 87%, 165° ROM vs Thompson 140° (Witt 2014)
O
Outcomes after Thompson decompression - 70-80% excellent pain relief for RTS (Roles 1972), 90% PIN palsy recovery with expectant management (Ring 2004), RESERVE exploration for no recovery by 12 weeks
M
Mobile wad muscles mobilized ANTERIORLY - brachioradialis and ECRL (anterior to Thompson interval), innervated by radial nerve BEFORE PIN bifurcation (preserved in PIN palsies, distinguishes from high radial nerve injury)
P
PIN injury risk 2% - iatrogenic injury during Thompson approach (nerve 2-5mm from radius periosteum, sharp dissection or plate screw risks laceration - Prasartritha 1993)
S
Supinator muscle splitting - split from RADIAL (lateral) to ULNAR (medial) side, parallel to PIN course (nerve spirals around lateral radius, splitting protects nerve on DEEP surface - Thompson 1918)
O
Only approach for PIN exploration - Thompson exposes PIN from Arcade of Frohse to supinator distal edge (Henry approach does NOT expose PIN, contraindicated for PIN decompression)
N
Ninety percent spontaneous recovery - PIN palsy with closed radius fractures (Ring 2004), median 4.2 months (range 2-7 months), AVOID premature exploration (increases iatrogenic injury risk)
Mnemonic

P-I-N P-A-L-S-Y'PIN PALSY' - Posterior Interosseous Nerve Palsy Clinical Features and Management

P
Pure motor nerve - PIN has NO sensory distribution (distinguishes from radial nerve injury which has sensory loss in first dorsal web space, superficial radial nerve separate from PIN)
I
Innervates ALL posterior forearm muscles EXCEPT brachioradialis and ECRL - these two innervated by radial nerve BEFORE PIN bifurcation (preserved in PIN palsies)
N
Ninety percent spontaneous recovery after closed radius fractures - median 4.2 months (Ring 2004), expectant management appropriate unless no EMG recovery by 12 weeks
P
Preserved wrist extension - ECRL innervated proximal to PIN bifurcation (5/5 wrist extension in PIN palsy distinguishes from high radial nerve injury with 0/5 wrist extension)
A
Arcade of Frohse PRIMARY compression site - 50-70% of PIN compressions at arcade (Spinner 1968), located 38±8mm distal to radial head, fibrous arch at proximal supinator
L
Leash of Henry SECONDARY compression site - radial recurrent artery branches crossing over PIN (30% of compressions - Spinner 1968), ligate during decompression (causes brisk bleeding)
S
Supinator muscle splits to expose PIN - Thompson approach splits supinator from radial to ulnar side, parallel to PIN course (nerve on DEEP surface, splitting protects nerve)
Y
Yield to expectant management - 90% recover spontaneously by 4 months (Ring 2004), AVOID premature exploration (2% iatrogenic injury risk), explore ONLY if no EMG recovery by 12 weeks

Thompson Approach (Posterior Interosseous Nerve Exposure) - Exam Day Essentials

High-Yield Exam Summary

Must-Know Anatomy

    Key Evidence - Thompson vs Henry Approach

      Critical Technique Steps

        Complications and Management

          Australian Clinical Context

            Exam Traps and High-Yield Points

              Quick Stats
              Complexityintermediate
              Reading Time10 min
              Updated2026-01-29
              Related

              Browse all procedures

              View full catalog