Comprehensive guide to the Thompson posterior interosseous approach to the proximal radius with emphasis on PIN protection, supinator splitting technique, and safe exposure of the proximal-middle radial shaft
Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team
Orthopaedic clinicians and medical editors • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team
Supinator Split | PIN at Arcade of Frohse | Proximal-Middle Radius Access
The Thompson approach (also called posterior interosseous nerve approach or dorsal approach to radius) is a POSTERIOR surgical approach to the proximal and middle third of the radial shaft for: (1) PIN exploration (posterior interosseous nerve compression syndromes, entrapment at Arcade of Frohse), (2) Proximal radius fracture fixation (radial neck, proximal shaft fractures), (3) Radial shaft tumor resection (bone tumor, metastatic lesions), and (4) Synovectomy (rheumatoid arthritis, elbow/wrist synovitis requiring PIN decompression).
Key Anatomical Relationships:
Historical Note: Thompson approach described by James Thompson (New Haven, 1918) for posterior radius exposure, emphasizing supinator muscle splitting parallel to PIN course. Spinner (1968) described Arcade of Frohse as primary site of PIN compression (50-70% of PIN entrapment syndromes). Henry (1957) described alternative anterolateral approach to radius that AVOIDS PIN exposure entirely, now preferred for most radial shaft fractures (Henry approach less than 1% PIN injury vs Thompson 2% - Witt 2014).
Most vulnerable structure: The PIN is the SINGLE MOST VULNERABLE structure during Thompson approach (0.5-2% iatrogenic injury rate - Kaplan 1978).
PIN course through supinator:
Critical safeguards (Thompson 1918):
PIN injury recognition:
Immediate postop PIN palsy management:
Anatomy: Fibrous arch at proximal supinator edge, 50-70% of PIN entrapment syndromes occur here (Spinner 1968)
Location: 38±8mm distal to radial head (range 20-60mm - Prasartritha 1993)
Anatomical variation:
Compression mechanisms:
Clinical presentations:
Diagnosis:
Surgical decompression technique:
Outcomes:
The Thompson approach provides access to the proximal and middle thirds of the radial shaft:
| Zone | Boundaries | Anatomical Features | Thompson Approach Access | PIN Location Relative to Radius |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radial head/neck | Radial head articular surface to radial tuberosity | Radial head articulates with capitellum, proximal radioulnar joint (PRUJ) with ulna | Difficult (limited proximal exposure, radial head deep to supinator origin) | PIN enters supinator 20-60mm distal to radial head (proximal to this zone) |
| Proximal 1/3 shaft | Radial tuberosity to junction with middle 1/3 (8-10cm distal to radial head) | Biceps tuberosity (anteromed ial, biceps insertion), supinator insertion (anterolateral) | IDEAL (Thompson approach directly exposes proximal shaft via supinator splitting) | PIN on DEEP surface of supinator (2-5mm from radius periosteum, protected by supinator muscle) |
| Middle 1/3 shaft | Junction proximal 1/3 to junction distal 1/3 (10-20cm distal to radial head) | Pronator teres insertion (midpoint lateral radius), interosseous membrane attachment (medial radius) | Good (Thompson approach extends to middle 1/3 by distal supinator splitting) | PIN exits supinator at proximal middle 1/3, divides into terminal branches on interosseous membrane (POSTERIOR dissection risky distal to supinator) |
| Distal 1/3 shaft | Junction middle 1/3 to Lister's tubercle (20-25cm distal to radial head) | Pronator quadratus origin (distal radius), styloid process (distal tip), Lister's tubercle (dorsal prominence) | Contraindicated (PIN terminal branches on interosseous membrane at risk, use Henry volar approach for distal 1/3) | PIN terminal branches diffuse on interosseous membrane (CANNOT safely expose distal 1/3 via posterior approach) |
The radius has THREE surfaces (anterior, posterior, lateral) and THREE borders (anterior, posterior, interosseous):
Safe Zones for Surgical Approach:
The "mobile wad" consists of THREE muscles arising from the lateral supracondylar ridge of humerus:
| Muscle | Origin | Insertion | Innervation | Function | Thompson Approach Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brachioradialis | Lateral supracondylar ridge (proximal 2/3) | Styloid process of radius (distal) | Radial nerve (BEFORE PIN bifurcation, C5-C6) | Elbow flexion (neutral forearm position), STRONGEST elbow flexor with forearm neutral | Mobilized ANTERIORLY during Thompson approach (forms ANTERIOR border of Thompson interval), innervation PRESERVED in PIN palsies |
| Extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) | Lateral supracondylar ridge (distal 1/3) | Base of 2nd metacarpal (dorsal) | Radial nerve (BEFORE PIN bifurcation, C6-C7) | Wrist extension, radial deviation | Mobilized ANTERIORLY (forms ANTERIOR border with brachioradialis), innervation PRESERVED in PIN palsies (distinguishes PIN palsy from high radial nerve injury - wrist extension 5/5 in PIN palsy, 0/5 in high radial nerve injury) |
| Extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) | Lateral epicondyle (common extensor origin) | Base of 3rd metacarpal (dorsal) | PIN (AFTER bifurcation, C7-C8) | Wrist extension | Forms POSTERIOR border of Thompson interval (retracted posteriorly to expose supinator), innervated by PIN (weak wrist extension 3-4/5 in PIN palsy, but ECRL compensates so wrist extension appears normal 5/5) |
The supinator muscle WRAPS AROUND the proximal-middle radius, with the PIN coursing on its DEEP surface:
Supinator Muscle and PIN Relationships:
The PIN is the deep motor branch of the radial nerve, responsible for innervating ALL posterior forearm muscles EXCEPT brachioradialis and ECRL:
Nerve Course and Branching:
PIN Motor Branches:
PIN Palsy Clinical Presentation:
IMPORTANT NOTE: Henry anterolateral approach is NOW PREFERRED over Thompson for most radial shaft fractures (Henry approach has less than 1% PIN injury risk vs Thompson 2%, Witt 2014), Thompson approach RESERVED for cases requiring PIN exploration or posterior access to radial head/neck.
| factor | thompson | henry | preferred |
|---|---|---|---|
| PIN Injury Risk | 2% (nerve directly exposed during supinator splitting, Kaplan 1978) | Less than 1% (nerve NOT exposed, Henry approach between brachioradialis and pronator teres avoids PIN, Witt 2014) | Henry (2× lower PIN injury risk) |
| Proximal Radius Exposure (Radial Head/Neck) | Good (posterior access to radial head via supinator origin reflection, ideal for radial head excision/replacement) | Limited (Henry approach accesses anterolateral radius, difficult to expose radial head articular surface posteriorly) | Thompson (better radial head access) |
| Middle 1/3 Radius Exposure | Good (extends to middle 1/3 by distal supinator splitting, limited distal exposure due to PIN terminal branches on interosseous membrane) | Excellent (Henry approach extends from proximal 1/3 to distal metaphysis, full radial shaft length) | Henry (superior length of exposure) |
| PIN Exploration Capability | Excellent (Thompson approach DESIGNED for PIN exposure, allows direct visualization from Arcade of Frohse to supinator distal edge, ideal for PIN decompression) | NONE (Henry approach does NOT expose PIN, nerve remains deep to supinator muscle) | Thompson (ONLY approach for PIN exploration) |
| Supination Strength Postoperatively | 85-90% of contralateral (supinator muscle split and heals with scar, reduces supination power 10-15% - Witt 2014) | 95-100% of contralateral (supinator muscle NOT violated, full supination strength preserved) | Henry (better functional outcome) |
| Operating Time | 90-120 minutes (proximal radius fracture ORIF, includes careful supinator splitting and PIN identification) | 60-90 minutes (radial shaft ORIF, no PIN dissection required) | Henry (30 minutes faster) |
| Rehabilitation Protocol | 6 weeks limited forearm rotation (protect supinator healing, avoid aggressive pronation/supination), then gradual strengthening | Immediate forearm rotation (supinator intact, no protection needed) | Henry (faster rehabilitation) |
| Radial Tunnel Syndrome Decompression | IDEAL (Thompson approach exposes Arcade of Frohse, Leash of Henry, supinator distal edge - ALL three PIN compression sites accessible) | Inadequate (Henry approach does NOT expose PIN compression sites, cannot perform decompression) | Thompson (ONLY approach for radial tunnel syndrome surgery) |
| Complications | PIN injury 2%, supinator weakness 10-15%, heterotopic ossification 5-10% (Thompson approach violates elbow capsule at radial head), wound infection 1-2% | PIN injury less than 1%, superficial radial nerve injury 2-3% (nerve courses on brachioradialis deep surface, at risk during Henry dissection - Witt 2014), wound infection 1-2% | Henry (lower overall complication rate) |
| Ideal Indication | PIN exploration (radial tunnel syndrome, PIN palsy), radial head/neck fractures requiring posterior access, proximal radius tumor requiring posterior exposure | Radial shaft fractures (proximal 1/3, middle 1/3, distal 1/3), proximal radius fractures NOT requiring PIN exploration, nonunion of radius | Thompson for PIN exploration ONLY, Henry for MOST radial shaft fractures |
"A 42-year-old female presents with 9 months of lateral elbow pain exacerbated by gripping and turning doorknobs. She has failed 6 months of physical therapy, activity modification, NSAIDs, and one corticosteroid injection. Examination reveals tenderness 4cm distal to the lateral epicondyle over the mobile wad, pain with resisted middle finger extension, and pain with resisted supination. Grip strength is 70% of contralateral. EMG shows prolonged PIN motor latency 5.2ms (normal less than 4.5ms). How do you manage this patient?"
"A 35-year-old male presents to ED after motorcycle accident with proximal radius fracture (Mason type III comminuted radial head fracture). On examination, he has 0/5 finger extension at MCP joints, 0/5 thumb extension, but 5/5 wrist extension (ECRL intact) and normal sensation in first dorsal web space. How do you manage the PIN palsy?"
"You are planning to fix a proximal radius shaft fracture (8cm distal to radial head, transverse fracture) in a 28-year-old male. The registrar suggests Thompson approach for 'direct posterior access.' Do you agree? Justify your approach selection."
High-Yield Exam Summary