Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • For Training Programs
  • Authors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Methodology
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Back to Operative Surgery
Trauma

Tibia Posterolateral Approach

Comprehensive guide to the posterolateral approach to the tibia for posterolateral tibial plateau fractures - prone positioning, CPN protection, fibular head anatomy, and buttress plating for Orthopaedic exam

Core Procedure
advanced
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Orthopaedic clinicians and medical editors • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Editorial boardMethodologyReview policyReport a correction
High Yield Overview

POSTEROLATERAL APPROACH TO THE TIBIA

Prone Position | CPN at Risk | Buttress Plating for PL Fragments

15-20%Tibial plateau fractures with PL fragment
PronePositioning required
1-2cmCPN distance from fibular neck
3.5mmTypical plate thickness for buttress

APPROACH VARIANTS

Standard PL
PatternLateral to fibular head, between peronei
TreatmentMost common
Fibular osteotomy
PatternFibular neck osteotomy for access
TreatmentComplex fractures
Extended lateral
PatternCombines with anterolateral
TreatmentBicondylar fractures

Critical Must-Knows

  • Prone or lateral positioning - NOT supine (cannot access PL tibia)
  • Common peroneal nerve runs around fibular neck - protect at ALL times
  • Between peroneus longus and soleus is the deep internervous plane
  • Buttress plate placed on posterolateral tibial surface
  • Cannot address anteromedial from this approach - may need combined

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Prone position mandatory - allows gravity retraction and true PL access
  • "
    CPN most at risk structure - identify early and protect throughout
  • "
    Fibular osteotomy extends exposure but adds morbidity (nonunion risk)
  • "
    Buttress plating key principle - prevents posterior displacement

Critical Posterolateral Approach Exam Points

Prone Position Essential

The posterolateral approach requires prone positioning. Cannot be done supine. Patient must be stable for prone position (no spinal injury, cardiovascular stability). Allows excellent visualization of the posterolateral tibial plateau.

CPN Protection Critical

The common peroneal nerve (CPN) wraps around the fibular neck 1-2cm distal to fibular head. Must be identified early and protected. Injury causes foot drop and severe permanent disability. Use gentle retraction, no metal retractors on nerve.

Buttress Plate Biomechanics

The posterolateral fragment displaces posteriorly under axial load. A buttress plate must be placed on the posterior surface to prevent re-displacement. Use contoured 3.5mm or locking plate. Screws directed anteriorly.

Combined Approach Often Needed

Bicondylar fractures (Schatzker V/VI) often require combined approaches. PL approach for posterolateral fragment, anterolateral or posteromedial for other columns. Plan for two-stage positioning if needed.

At a Glance

The posterolateral approach to the tibia provides access to posterolateral tibial plateau fragments, which occur in 15-20% of tibial plateau fractures and cannot be adequately visualized or stabilized through standard anterolateral approaches. Prone positioning is mandatory for true posterolateral access, with the incision placed lateral to the fibular head between peroneus longus and soleus. The common peroneal nerve (CPN) is the critical at-risk structure, wrapping around the fibular neck 1-2cm distal to the fibular head—it must be identified early and protected throughout. A buttress plate placed on the posterolateral tibial surface prevents posterior displacement under axial loading. Bicondylar fractures (Schatzker V/VI) often require combined approaches with staged positioning.

Mnemonic

POSTEROLATPRONE POSTEROLATERAL - Surgical Steps

P
Prone positioning
Affected side accessible
O
Oblique incision
Behind fibular head
S
Subcutaneous dissection
Identify fascial plane
T
Take care with CPN
Identify and protect early
E
Enter between peronei and soleus
Internervous plane
R
Retract muscles gently
Expose posterior tibia
O
Open capsule if needed
Visualize articular surface
L
Lift and reduce fragment
Use bone graft for void
A
Apply buttress plate
Posterior surface
T
Test stability
Fluoroscopy confirmation

Memory Hook:POSTEROLAT approach - always PRONE with CPN protection!

Mnemonic

CPN SAFECPN - Protection Principles

C
Course around fibular neck
1-2cm distal to fibular head
P
Palpate before incision
Can feel where nerve crosses
N
No metal retractors on nerve
Use tape slings only
S
Self-retaining retractors avoid
Use assistants instead
A
Avoid prolonged pressure
Release retractors every 20 min
F
Fibular osteotomy option
If more access needed
E
Examine function post-op
Document ankle dorsiflexion

Memory Hook:The CPN is the most important structure at risk - keep it SAFE!

Indications and Approach Selection

Primary Indications:

  • Posterolateral tibial plateau fractures (isolated PL column)
  • Schatzker II fractures with significant posterolateral split-depression
  • Bicondylar fractures (V/VI) requiring posterolateral column fixation
  • Revision surgery for posterolateral fragment malunion

Why This Approach is Chosen: The posterolateral tibial plateau is inaccessible from standard anterolateral approaches. The tibial plateau slopes posteriorly approximately 10 degrees, and posterolateral fragments displace posteriorly under axial load. Only a posterolateral approach allows direct buttress plating of this fragment.

Contraindications:

  • Medical unfitness for prone position (spinal cord injury, recent MI)
  • Active infection of skin over approach
  • Severe soft tissue compromise posteriorly (may need delay)
  • Isolated anterior/medial fractures (use appropriate alternative approach)

Alternative Approaches:

  • Anterolateral approach: For lateral plateau split/depression without PL fragment
  • Posteromedial approach: For medial plateau or posteromedial fragments
  • Extended lateral with fibular osteotomy: When combined AL and PL access needed
  • Anteromedial approach: For medial plateau fractures

Overview

Definition

Posterolateral Approach to the Tibia provides direct access to the posterolateral tibial plateau for fractures that cannot be adequately visualized or fixed through standard anterolateral approaches.

Key Characteristics:

  • Requires prone or lateral decubitus positioning
  • Common peroneal nerve (CPN) is the critical at-risk structure
  • Enables buttress plating of posteriorly displacing fragments
  • Often used in combination with other approaches for complex fractures

Clinical Significance

Why This Approach Matters:

  • 15-20% of tibial plateau fractures involve posterolateral fragments
  • PL fragments missed on plain radiographs in up to 20% of cases
  • Cannot buttress PL fragments from anterolateral approach
  • Malreduction leads to posterior subluxation and early arthritis

Exam Relevance:

  • High-yield surgical approach for Operative Surgery station
  • CPN protection is a classic examiner question

Anatomy

Bony Anatomy: The posterolateral tibial plateau forms part of the lateral tibial condyle. The tibial plateau has an inherent 7-10 degree posterior slope. The posterolateral corner is the least supported region, making it vulnerable to split-depression fractures with axial loading combined with valgus stress.

Muscular Layers:

LayerMuscleNerve SupplyAction
SuperficialBiceps femorisSciatic (tibial + CPN)Knee flexion, lateral rotation
Lateral compartmentPeroneus longusSuperficial peronealPlantar flexion, eversion
Lateral compartmentPeroneus brevisSuperficial peronealEversion
Posterior superficialGastrocnemius (lateral head)TibialKnee flexion, plantarflexion
Posterior deepSoleusTibialPlantarflexion

Neurovascular Anatomy:

StructureLocationClinical Significance
Common peroneal nerveWraps around fibular neck 1-2cm distal to headMOST IMPORTANT - injury causes foot drop
Superficial peroneal nerveBetween peroneus longus and brevisSupplies lateral compartment muscles
Deep peroneal nerveDeep in anterior compartmentNot at risk in this approach
Peroneal arteryDeep in posterior compartmentMay be encountered with deep dissection
Anterior tibial arteryThrough interosseous membraneProtected by anterior compartment

Three-Column Classification of Tibial Plateau: Understanding which column is fractured guides approach selection:

  • Lateral column: Anterolateral approach
  • Medial column: Anteromedial or posteromedial approach
  • Posterior column (PL + PM): Posterolateral and/or posteromedial approach

Internervous Plane

Deep Internervous Plane:

  • Between: Peroneus longus (superficial peroneal nerve) laterally and Soleus (tibial nerve) medially/posteriorly
  • Clinical relevance: This is the safe interval between the two muscle groups innervated by different nerves

Superficial Dissection: There is no true internervous plane in the superficial dissection. The approach passes through the lateral compartment which is supplied entirely by the superficial peroneal nerve. However, the muscles are retracted rather than divided, minimizing denervation risk.

Internervous Plane Nuance

Unlike hip approaches where the internervous plane is between two major muscles, the tibial posterolateral approach relies on inter-compartmental dissection between the lateral and posterior compartments. The key is to stay anterior to the soleus while protecting the CPN which runs between the two heads of peroneus longus.

Structures at Risk in Each Layer:

LayerStructureProtection Strategy
SuperficialCommon peroneal nerveIdentify early, tape sling, no metal retractors
DeepPeroneal vesselsLigate small branches, preserve major vessels
DeepPopliteal vesselsShould not be encountered if dissection plane correct
ArticularLateral meniscusIncise capsule carefully, protect during reduction

Positioning and Patient Setup

Position: Prone on Radiolucent Table

Pre-positioning Checklist:

  • Confirm patient stable for prone position (anesthetic assessment)
  • Padding for all pressure points (face, chest, pelvis, patella, ankles)
  • Arms positioned safely (abducted less than 90 degrees, padded)
  • Radiolucent table confirmed
  • C-arm access verified from lateral aspect

Positioning Details:

  • Prone position with chest rolls or Wilson frame
  • Affected knee slightly flexed over a bolster (relaxes CPN)
  • Foot overhanging end of table or supported
  • Tourniquet applied high on thigh if planned (consider tourniquet-free surgery)

Prone Position Risks

Prone positioning carries risks including facial swelling, brachial plexus injury, and compartment syndrome of the thigh. Limit operative time, ensure adequate padding, and document all protective measures taken.

Alternative Positioning:

  • Lateral decubitus can be used with the affected side UP
  • Allows combination with anteromedial or anterolateral approaches without repositioning
  • Some exposure is sacrificed compared to true prone positioning

Surface Anatomy and Landmarks

Key Bony Landmarks:

  • Fibular head - palpable prominence lateral to knee
  • Biceps femoris tendon - inserts onto fibular head
  • Lateral tibial plateau - can palpate lateral joint line
  • Gerdy's tubercle - anterolateral tibial insertion of ITB

Key Soft Tissue Landmarks:

  • Common peroneal nerve - can often be palpated wrapping around fibular neck
  • Popliteal fossa - defines posterior boundary
  • Lateral gastrocnemius head - marks posterior musculature

Incision Planning:

  • Longitudinal incision behind the fibular head extending distally
  • Length: 8-12cm depending on exposure required
  • Stays anterior to the biceps tendon proximally
  • Curves around fibular head following the lateral fibular border

Classification

Three-Column Classification (Luo)

Column-Based Approach Selection

ColumnLocationApproach RequiredKey Structure at Risk
LateralAnterolateral plateauAnterolateral approachPeroneal nerve branches
MedialAnteromedial plateauAnteromedial approachSaphenous nerve/vein
PosterolateralPosterior-lateral plateauPOSTEROLATERAL approachCommon Peroneal Nerve
PosteromedialPosterior-medial plateauPosteromedial approachSaphenous nerve

Schatzker Classification Relevance

  • Type II: Lateral split-depression - may have PL component
  • Type V: Bicondylar - often requires combined approaches
  • Type VI: Bicondylar with metaphyseal-diaphyseal dissociation - frequently has posterior fragments

Approach Variants

Posterolateral Approach Modifications

VariantIndicationTechniqueCPN Risk
Standard PLMost PL plateau fracturesLateral to fibula, no osteotomyModerate (3-5%)
With fibular osteotomyComplex/large PL fragmentsOblique fibular neck cutHigher (5-10%)
Extended lateralCombined AL + PL accessSingle incision, extended exposureModerate-high
Prone combinedPL + PM fragmentsTwo separate incisions, one positionModerate (PL side)

Fragment Morphology Classification

  • Split: Vertical fracture line - direct reduction and buttress
  • Depression: Impacted articular surface - requires elevation and grafting
  • Split-depression: Combination - most common pattern

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Mechanism: High-energy (MVA, fall from height) vs low-energy (elderly, osteoporotic)
  • Timing of injury: Affects soft tissue planning
  • Associated injuries: Polytrauma assessment
  • Medical fitness: Suitability for prone positioning

Examination

Neurovascular Assessment (Critical):

  • Dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulses: Document bilateral comparison
  • Ankle dorsiflexion: Tests CPN function pre-operatively (baseline)
  • Toe extension: Deep peroneal nerve function
  • First web space sensation: Deep peroneal sensory

Soft Tissue Assessment:

  • Swelling: Degree and circumference
  • Blistering: Serous vs hemorrhagic (hemorrhagic = deeper injury)
  • Wrinkle test: Positive indicates safe for surgery
  • Skin condition: Abrasions, lacerations, degloving

Soft Tissue Timing Protocol

Immediate Surgery (within 24-48 hours):

  • Open fractures
  • Vascular injury requiring repair
  • Compartment syndrome

Delayed Definitive Fixation (7-14 days):

  • Significant swelling/blistering
  • Wait for wrinkle test positive
  • Use spanning external fixator for interim stability

Wrinkle Test Interpretation:

  • Positive: Skin wrinkles when compressed - adequate dermal blood flow
  • Negative: Skin does not wrinkle - delay surgery

Soft Tissue Compromise

Operating through compromised soft tissue increases infection risk from 2-5% to 20-30%. Always wait for soft tissue recovery unless emergent indication.

Investigations

Imaging Algorithm

Plain Radiographs (Initial):

  • AP knee - assess overall alignment, fracture pattern
  • Lateral knee - identify posterior fragment displacement
  • Oblique views (internal and external rotation) - improve fragment visualization

CT Scan (Essential for ALL tibial plateau fractures):

  • Axial, coronal, sagittal reconstructions
  • 3D reconstruction for surgical planning
  • Identifies posterolateral fragments missed in up to 20% on plain films
  • Quantifies articular depression and fragment size

CT is Mandatory

Every tibial plateau fracture being considered for operative treatment requires CT scanning. Posterolateral fragments are commonly missed on plain radiographs and change the surgical approach.

CT-Based Three-Column Analysis

Systematic CT Review:

  1. Axial cuts at joint line: Identify all column involvement
  2. Coronal reconstructions: Assess articular depression depth
  3. Sagittal reconstructions: Evaluate posterior slope and fragment displacement
  4. 3D surface rendering: Overall fracture morphology visualization

Fragment Size Assessment:

  • Small PL fragment (less than 25% of plateau): May accept some malreduction
  • Large PL fragment (greater than 25%): Requires anatomic reduction
  • Split-depression: Measure depth of depression (greater than 5mm typically operative)

Additional Investigations

MRI (Selective Use):

  • Ligamentous injury assessment if suspected
  • Meniscal pathology evaluation
  • Usually not required for surgical planning of fracture

Angiography/CTA:

  • If vascular injury suspected (absent pulses, ABI less than 0.9)
  • High-energy injuries with knee dislocation component

Management

Non-Operative Management

Indications (Rare for PL fragments):

  • Non-displaced or minimally displaced (less than 2mm step-off)
  • Low functional demand patient
  • Medical contraindications to surgery

Protocol:

  • Hinged knee brace
  • Non-weight bearing 6-8 weeks
  • Early ROM exercises
  • Serial radiographs to monitor displacement

Operative Management (Standard for PL Fragments)

Surgical Indications:

  • Articular step-off greater than 2mm
  • Condylar widening greater than 5mm
  • Any instability in extension
  • Associated ligamentous injury requiring repair

Approach Selection Based on CT:

  • Isolated PL fragment → Posterolateral approach
  • PL + PM fragments → Combined posterior approaches (prone)
  • PL + lateral column → Extended lateral or staged approaches
  • Bicondylar (Schatzker V/VI) → Multiple approaches, staged positioning

Staged Management Protocol

Stage 1 (Acute, 0-48 hours):

  • Closed reduction if subluxed
  • Spanning external fixator if unstable
  • Elevation, ice, soft tissue monitoring
  • DVT prophylaxis

Stage 2 (Definitive, 7-14 days):

  • Wait for wrinkle test positive
  • CT-based surgical planning
  • Definitive ORIF through appropriate approach(es)

Combined Approach Planning

Positioning Strategy for Combined Approaches

FragmentsPositioningApproach OrderConsiderations
PL onlyPronePosterolateralSingle position, single approach
PL + PMProneBoth posterior approachesSame position, two incisions
PL + ALLateral decubitusPL then ALMay need repositioning
PL + PM + ALProne then SupinePosterior first, then anteriorStaged positioning required

Key Principle: Fix posterior columns first (harder to access), then flip for anterior work if needed.

Surgical Technique

Step 1: Incision

Make a longitudinal incision starting at lateral joint line and extending distally along posterior border of fibula. Length 8-12cm depending on fracture extent.

Step 2: Superficial Dissection

Incise skin and subcutaneous tissue. Identify and protect the lateral sural cutaneous nerve if encountered. Incise fascia over lateral compartment.

Step 3: CPN Identification (CRITICAL)

The CPN emerges from behind the biceps femoris tendon. It wraps around the fibular neck 1-2cm distal to the fibular head. Identify it early before any retraction. Carefully trace its course. Place vessel loop or tape sling for gentle retraction.

Step 4: Deep Dissection

Develop plane between peroneus longus (anterior) and soleus (posterior). Retract peroneus longus anteriorly (CPN goes with it - protected). Retract soleus and gastrocnemius posteriorly. Subperiosteal dissection exposes posterolateral tibial plateau.

Articular Visualization:

Incise the posterolateral capsule if articular surface visualization needed. Protect the lateral meniscus carefully. Irrigate to visualize articular fragments clearly.

Fragment Reduction:

Use bone tamps to elevate depressed fragments. Reduce split fragments with pointed reduction clamps. Provisional K-wire fixation to maintain reduction during plate application.

Bone Graft:

Metaphyseal void after fragment elevation requires grafting. Options include cancellous autograft from same incision or distal femur, allograft, or bone substitute materials.

Fluoroscopy Confirmation:

Obtain AP, lateral, and oblique views to confirm articular reduction. Assess joint line restoration and posterior tibial slope. Accept less than 2mm articular step-off.

Plate Selection:

Use a 3.5mm T-plate, L-plate, or anatomic posterolateral tibial plateau plate. Choose locking or non-locking depending on bone quality. Contour carefully to match the posterior tibial surface.

Buttress Plate Placement:

Apply plate to the posterior tibial surface. Proximal screws capture the posterolateral fragment. Direct screws anteriorly and medially. Avoid intra-articular screw placement by checking under fluoroscopy.

Fixation Principles:

The buttress plate function prevents posterior displacement under load. Use at least 3-4 screws in the proximal fragment. Place distal screws in healthy diaphyseal bone for stable construct.

Irrigation:

Copious irrigation with normal saline. Check for any bleeding vessels and achieve meticulous hemostasis before closure.

Drain:

Consider drain placement based on surgeon preference. If used, exit the drain away from the CPN course.

Closure Layers:

Close the capsule if opened using absorbable suture. Close fascial layer with absorbable suture. Approximate subcutaneous tissue. Close skin with staples or interrupted sutures.

Post-operative Imaging:

Confirm reduction and fixation on fluoroscopy. Obtain full-length AP and lateral radiographs. Consider CT if any concern about articular reduction quality.

Structures at Risk

Common Peroneal Nerve

THE most important structure at risk. Wraps around fibular neck 1-2cm distal to fibular head. Injury causes foot drop (loss of ankle dorsiflexion and toe extension). Prevention: early identification, gentle handling, vessel loop protection, no metal retractors.

Peroneal Vessels

The peroneal artery and veins run deep in the posterior compartment. Usually not encountered with correct dissection plane. If damaged, ligate small branches; major vessel injury requires repair.

Lateral Inferior Geniculate Artery

Branch of popliteal artery at the joint line. May be encountered during capsular incision. Ligate if bleeding - does not require repair.

Lateral Meniscus

At risk during capsular incision and articular surface visualization. Protect during reduction maneuvers. Peripheral tears can be repaired; body tears may need partial meniscectomy.

CPN Injury Management:

  • If nerve identified as damaged intra-operatively: primary repair if transected
  • If neurapraxia suspected: observe, document, follow up closely
  • Post-operative foot drop: urgent EMG/NCS at 3 weeks, consider exploration if no recovery by 3 months

Extensile Modifications

Fibular Osteotomy:

  • Indication: When standard PL approach does not provide adequate exposure
  • Technique: Oblique osteotomy of fibular neck from posterolateral to anteromedial
  • CPN protection: Must identify and protect nerve BEFORE osteotomy
  • Fixation: Repair with small plate or tension band at end of case
  • Complication: Fibular nonunion (5%), CPN injury (higher risk)

Proximal Extension:

  • Can extend incision proximally along biceps femoris
  • Allows access to the posterolateral femoral condyle if needed
  • CPN becomes more superficial proximally - increased risk

Distal Extension:

  • Extend distally along fibula for access to tibial diaphysis
  • Useful for fractures extending into shaft
  • Stay in same intermuscular plane

Combined Approaches: For bicondylar fractures (Schatzker V/VI), often need:

  • Posterolateral approach (for PL fragment)
  • Plus anteromedial approach (for PM fragment)
  • Or anterolateral (for lateral plateau split)

Complications

Intra-operative Complications:

ComplicationPreventionManagement
CPN injuryEarly ID, gentle retraction, no metal retractorsDocument, EMG at 3 weeks, explore if no recovery
Articular malreductionGood visualization, fluoroscopy, CT if concernAccept less than 2mm step-off; redo if more
Peroneal vessel injuryStay in correct planeLigate small branches, repair major vessels
Intra-articular hardwareCareful screw length measurement, fluoroscopyRemove and replace with shorter screw

Post-operative Complications:

ComplicationIncidencePreventionTreatment
CPN palsy3-5%Careful techniqueObserve, AFO, explore if no recovery 3 months
Infection2-5%Antibiotics, soft tissue restIrrigation and debridement, antibiotic suppression or removal
Post-traumatic OA20-40%Anatomic reductionWeight loss, analgesia, eventual TKA
Nonunion/malunionUnder 5%Bone graft, stable fixationRevision ORIF or TKA
DVT/PE2-5%Chemoprophylaxis, early mobilizationAnticoagulation

CPN Injury Statistics

CPN injury in tibial plateau surgery ranges from 3-20% depending on approach and complexity. Posterolateral approaches have higher risk than anterolateral. Most injuries are neurapraxia that recover, but permanent foot drop occurs in 1-3% and is a devastating complication.

Post-operative Care

Immediate Post-operative:

  • Neurovascular check documenting ankle dorsiflexion (CPN function)
  • Wound inspection
  • Knee immobilizer or hinged brace for comfort
  • Elevate limb above heart level

Weight Bearing Protocol:

  • Non-weight bearing or touch weight bearing for 6-12 weeks
  • Progression based on fracture healing and surgeon preference
  • Crutches or walker required

Range of Motion:

  • CPM or early ROM exercises as pain allows
  • Goal: 0-90 degrees by 6 weeks
  • No resistance exercises until fracture healed

Follow-up Schedule:

  • 2 weeks: Wound check, suture/staple removal
  • 6 weeks: Radiographs, assess healing, progress WB if appropriate
  • 12 weeks: Radiographs, confirm union, progress to full WB
  • 6 months: Final radiographs, functional assessment
  • 1 year: Clinical and radiographic review

DVT Prophylaxis:

  • LMWH or aspirin per institutional protocol
  • Duration: Until mobile (minimum 2 weeks, often 4-6 weeks)

Postoperative Care Protocol

Immediate Post-Operative (0-48 hours)

Critical Monitoring:

  • Neurovascular check every 2 hours for first 24 hours
  • Document ankle dorsiflexion (CPN function) - compare to pre-op baseline
  • Monitor for compartment syndrome (pain, pallor, pulselessness, paresthesia)
  • Wound inspection at 24-48 hours

Positioning and Immobilization:

  • Elevate limb above heart level
  • Knee immobilizer or hinged brace locked in extension
  • Ice packs around knee (not directly on surgical site)

Weight Bearing Protocol

  • Weeks 0-6: Non-weight bearing or touch weight bearing
  • Weeks 6-10: Partial weight bearing (25-50%)
  • Weeks 10-12: Progressive to full weight bearing
  • Progression criteria: Radiographic evidence of healing, no pain with weight bearing

Rehabilitation Phases

Phase 1 (Weeks 0-6): Protection

  • NWB with crutches/walker
  • Passive ROM 0-90 degrees as tolerated
  • Quadriceps isometrics, ankle pumps
  • No active hamstring exercises (protect repair)

Phase 2 (Weeks 6-12): Early Motion

  • Progressive weight bearing per radiographs
  • Active ROM exercises
  • Stationary bike when 90 degrees flexion achieved
  • Proprioceptive training begins

Phase 3 (Weeks 12+): Strengthening

  • Full weight bearing
  • Closed-chain strengthening (squats, leg press)
  • Return to activities based on function
  • Full return to sport/work 6-12 months

DVT Prophylaxis

  • LMWH or aspirin per institutional protocol
  • Duration: Until mobile (minimum 2 weeks, often 4-6 weeks)
  • Consider mechanical prophylaxis (IPC) while inpatient

Outcomes

Functional Outcomes

Good Prognostic Factors:

  • Anatomic articular reduction (less than 2mm step-off)
  • Young age and low energy mechanism
  • Isolated PL fragment (not bicondylar)
  • No associated ligament injury
  • Early ROM and rehabilitation

Poor Prognostic Factors:

  • Articular step-off greater than 2mm
  • Bicondylar fractures (Schatzker V/VI)
  • Associated ligament/meniscal injury
  • High-energy mechanism
  • Delayed surgery due to soft tissue compromise

Long-Term Outcomes by Fracture Type

Outcome Comparison

Fracture PatternGood/Excellent ResultOA Rate at 10 yearsTKA Conversion
Isolated PL split85-90%15-20%5-10%
PL split-depression75-85%25-30%10-15%
Bicondylar (V/VI)60-75%40-50%15-25%

Complications Impact on Outcomes

  • CPN injury: 60% full recovery, 30% partial recovery, 10% permanent
  • Infection: Deep infection significantly worsens outcome
  • Malreduction: Each mm of step-off increases OA risk
  • Stiffness: Rarely limits function if greater than 90 degrees flexion achieved

Key Outcome Message

The single most important factor for good outcome is anatomic articular reduction - less than 2mm step-off. This is why CT scanning and appropriate approach selection (including posterolateral when indicated) are critical.

Evidence Base

Posterolateral Approach Without Fibular Osteotomy

4
Frosch et al • Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery (2010)
Key Findings:
  • Direct posterolateral approach provides adequate exposure for most PL tibial plateau fragments
  • Fibular osteotomy not required in majority of cases
  • Lower CPN injury risk without osteotomy
  • Buttress plating achievable through standard approach
Clinical Implication: Supports the non-osteotomy approach as primary technique for most posterolateral tibial plateau fractures

Articular Reduction Quality and Outcomes

3
Rademakers et al • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (2007)
Key Findings:
  • Articular step-off greater than 2mm associated with worse functional outcomes
  • Earlier onset of post-traumatic osteoarthritis with malreduction
  • Anatomic reduction improves long-term knee function
  • CT assessment of reduction recommended
Clinical Implication: Emphasizes importance of anatomic reduction - less than 2mm step-off is the goal for optimal outcomes

Three-Column Classification

4
Luo et al • Bone and Joint Journal (2010)
Key Findings:
  • Three-column concept divides tibial plateau into lateral, medial, and posterior columns
  • Posterior column further divided into posteromedial and posterolateral
  • Classification guides surgical planning and approach selection
  • CT-based assessment essential for accurate classification
Clinical Implication: Foundation for understanding which approach or approaches are needed for each fracture pattern

CT Detection of Posterolateral Fragments

4
Bhattacharyya et al • Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (2006)
Key Findings:
  • Posterolateral fragments commonly missed on plain radiographs
  • CT scanning essential for all tibial plateau fractures
  • Up to 20% of tibial plateau fractures have posterolateral fragments
  • Adequate reduction of PL fragments correlates with better outcomes
Clinical Implication: CT scanning mandatory for preoperative planning of all tibial plateau fractures to avoid missed fragments

CPN Injury in Tibial Plateau Surgery

3
Elsoe et al • Injury (2015)
Key Findings:
  • CPN injury occurred in 5.5% of operatively treated tibial plateau fractures
  • Most injuries recovered within 12 months
  • Permanent injury occurred in 1.5% of cases
  • Posterolateral approaches associated with higher risk than anterolateral
Clinical Implication: Consent must include discussion of CPN injury risk - examiners will ask about this complication

MCQ Practice Points

Position Question

Q: What position is required for the posterolateral approach to the tibia? A: Prone position is required. The posterolateral tibial plateau cannot be adequately exposed in the supine position. Lateral decubitus (affected side up) is an alternative that allows combination with other approaches.

Nerve at Risk Question

Q: What is the most important structure at risk during the posterolateral approach? A: The common peroneal nerve (CPN) is the most critical structure. It wraps around the fibular neck 1-2cm distal to the fibular head and is at risk during retraction. Injury causes foot drop.

Internervous Plane Question

Q: What is the deep internervous plane in the posterolateral approach? A: Between peroneus longus (superficial peroneal nerve) and soleus (tibial nerve). This inter-compartmental plane allows access to the posterolateral tibia without denervating muscle.

Buttress Plate Question

Q: Why is a buttress plate required for posterolateral tibial plateau fractures? A: The posterolateral fragment displaces posteriorly under axial load. A buttress plate on the posterior tibial surface prevents this displacement. An anterolateral plate cannot provide this buttress function.

CT Importance Question

Q: Why is CT scanning essential for tibial plateau fractures? A: Posterolateral fragments are commonly missed on plain radiographs. CT defines the fracture morphology, identifies all fragments, and allows preoperative planning of approach selection. Up to 20% of tibial plateau fractures have posterolateral fragments requiring direct fixation.

Combined Approach Question

Q: When would you use combined approaches for tibial plateau fractures? A: Bicondylar fractures (Schatzker V/VI) often require combined approaches. Use posterolateral approach for PL fragments plus anteromedial or anterolateral for other columns. May require staged positioning.

Australian Context

Tibial plateau fractures are commonly managed at major trauma centers throughout Australia. The three-column concept is widely adopted, and CT scanning is now standard for operative planning. Australian trauma surgeons increasingly utilize posterior approaches when posterolateral or posteromedial fragments are identified.

The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) trauma committees emphasize the importance of preoperative planning and approach selection based on CT findings. Early soft tissue assessment is critical given the high-energy mechanism in many Australian cases (motor vehicle accidents, agricultural injuries).

Consent in Australia should include discussion of CPN injury risk (3-5%), infection risk (2-5%), post-traumatic arthritis (20-40%), and the possibility of requiring total knee replacement in the future if significant articular cartilage damage has occurred.

Orthopaedic Relevance

For the Orthopaedic Operative Surgery station, you must be able to describe the posterolateral approach systematically: prone positioning, CPN identification and protection, the internervous plane, and buttress plate placement. Know the evidence for CT scanning of all tibial plateau fractures and when combined approaches are needed.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Posterolateral Tibial Plateau Fracture

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old presents after a motorcycle accident with a tibial plateau fracture. CT shows a posterolateral split-depression fragment. How would you approach this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Assessment: Full trauma assessment following ATLS principles. Detailed history of mechanism. Clinical examination for knee stability, neurovascular status (especially ankle dorsiflexion), and soft tissue condition. Imaging with plain radiographs (AP, lateral, oblique) followed by CT with 3D reconstruction.

Surgical Planning: CT confirms posterolateral fragment - requires posterolateral approach as cannot buttress from anterolateral. Patient must be suitable for prone positioning. Assess soft tissue - wait for wrinkle test if blistering present.

Surgical Approach: Prone position on radiolucent table. Longitudinal incision posterior to fibula. Identify and protect CPN early - vessel loop. Develop plane between peroneus longus (anteriorly) and soleus (posteriorly). Expose posterolateral tibial plateau.

Reduction and Fixation: Elevate depressed fragments with bone tamp. Reduce split component with clamps. Bone graft metaphyseal void. Apply buttress plate to posterior tibial surface with screws directed anteriorly. Confirm reduction on fluoroscopy - accept less than 2mm step-off.

Post-operative: Document CPN function. NWB for 6-12 weeks. Early ROM. DVT prophylaxis.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Confirm fracture morphology on CT - posterolateral fragment identified
Posterolateral approach required - cannot fix from anterior
Prone positioning essential for true PL access
CPN identification and protection is paramount
Develop plane between peroneus longus and soleus
Elevate depressed fragments, bone graft void
Buttress plate on posterior tibial surface
Aim for less than 2mm articular step-off
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting to fix from anterolateral approach (cannot buttress PL fragment)
✗Not ordering CT preoperatively (misses PL fragments)
✗Forgetting CPN protection (most important structure at risk)
✗Not mentioning buttress plate principle
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the patient also has a posteromedial fragment?"
"How would you manage a CPN palsy post-operatively?"
"What is the long-term prognosis for this fracture?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Post-operative CPN Palsy

EXAMINER

"During a posterolateral approach, you notice the patient develops weak ankle dorsiflexion post-operatively. What is your assessment and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Immediate Assessment: Full motor examination - test ankle dorsiflexion (deep peroneal nerve), toe extension (deep peroneal), and foot eversion (superficial peroneal). Sensory examination - first web space (deep peroneal) and lateral leg/dorsum of foot (superficial peroneal). Document findings accurately.

Exclude Other Causes: Remove dressings - check for constriction. Assess for compartment syndrome (pain with passive stretch, tense compartments). Review intra-operative events - was nerve visualized, any inadvertent injury noted?

Most Likely Diagnosis: Common peroneal nerve neurapraxia from traction or compression during retraction. CPN is particularly vulnerable as it wraps around the fibular neck with limited mobility.

Initial Management: Provide ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) to maintain ankle in neutral and prevent equinus contracture. Counsel patient about prognosis - most neurapraxias recover within 3-6 months. Document thoroughly including discussion with patient.

Follow-up Plan: EMG/NCS at 3 weeks post-injury (allows time for Wallerian degeneration if axonal injury). If no clinical or EMG recovery by 3 months, consider nerve exploration. Tendon transfers (tibialis posterior to dorsum) are an option for permanent foot drop.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Diagnosis: likely common peroneal nerve injury
Mechanism: traction, compression from retractors, or direct injury
Immediate assessment: full motor and sensory exam of the foot
Check for correctable causes (tight dressing, compartment syndrome)
Most CPN injuries are neurapraxia - will recover
AFO to prevent equinus contracture
EMG/NCS at 3 weeks to assess severity
Consider exploration if no recovery by 3 months
COMMON TRAPS
✗Assuming it will resolve without investigation
✗Promising full recovery (60% recover, not 100%)
✗Not providing AFO for function during recovery
✗Not documenting the injury and discussing prognosis with patient
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What would you see on EMG if this were neurapraxia versus axonotmesis?"
"When would you consider nerve exploration?"
"What are the long-term options if permanent foot drop?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 3: Bicondylar Tibial Plateau Fracture Planning

EXAMINER

"You are planning surgery for a Schatzker VI tibial plateau fracture with significant posteromedial and posterolateral fragments. How would you approach this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

CT Analysis: Use three-column concept to analyze fracture. Identify: lateral column involvement, medial column involvement, and posterior column (subdivided into posteromedial and posterolateral). This Schatzker VI with PM and PL fragments requires at least two approaches.

Approach Selection: Posterolateral approach for PL fragment (prone, lateral to fibula, buttress plate posteriorly). Posteromedial approach for PM fragment (prone or supine with leg externally rotated, medial to gastrocnemius, buttress plate posteromedially). If significant anterior column involvement, add anterolateral approach.

Positioning Strategy - Option 1: Start prone - allows access to both PL and PM fragments through separate incisions. Can address both posterior columns in one position. May need to flip to supine if anterolateral approach required.

Positioning Strategy - Option 2: Lateral decubitus with affected side up - allows access to PM and PL without repositioning, and can also access anterolateral. Some surgeons prefer this for combined approaches.

Sequence: Generally fix posterior columns first as they are more difficult to access. Then flip to supine for anterior work if needed. Bone graft all metaphyseal voids. Aim for less than 2mm articular step-off on all columns.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
CT-based planning essential - define all columns involved
Three-column concept guides approach selection
Posterolateral approach for PL fragment
Posteromedial approach for PM fragment
Consider anterolateral for lateral column if needed
Positioning strategy: prone first (PL and PM), then supine (anterior) OR lateral decubitus for all
Usually fix posterior columns first, then anterior
Bone graft metaphyseal voids
COMMON TRAPS
✗Trying to fix everything from one approach
✗Not considering positioning logistics for combined approaches
✗Forgetting to bone graft the metaphyseal void
✗Not achieving anatomic reduction (less than 2mm step-off)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you decide the order of approaches?"
"What are the soft tissue considerations for timing of surgery?"
"When would you use a fibular osteotomy?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 4: Posterolateral vs Posteromedial Approach

EXAMINER

"What are the key differences between the posterolateral and posteromedial approaches to the tibia?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Posterolateral Approach: Targets the posterolateral tibial plateau. Positioning: prone or lateral decubitus with affected side up. Incision: posterior to fibula. Internervous plane: between peroneus longus (superficial peroneal nerve) and soleus (tibial nerve). Key structure at risk: COMMON PERONEAL NERVE - injury causes foot drop (motor loss).

Posteromedial Approach: Targets the posteromedial tibial plateau. Positioning: prone, lateral, or supine with leg externally rotated (knee flexed). Incision: posteromedial leg, along medial border of gastrocnemius. Internervous plane: between medial gastrocnemius (tibial nerve) and semimembranosus/pes anserinus (tibial nerve branches). Key structure at risk: SAPHENOUS NERVE - sensory only.

Safety Comparison: The posteromedial approach is generally considered safer because the nerve at risk (saphenous) is sensory only, whereas the posterolateral approach risks the CPN which causes significant motor deficit (foot drop) if injured.

Common Principle: Both approaches require buttress plate placement on the posterior tibial surface to prevent posterior fragment displacement under axial loading.

When to Use Both: Bicondylar fractures (Schatzker V/VI) often have both PM and PL fragments requiring both approaches for complete fixation.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
PL approach: prone or lateral, targets posterolateral plateau
PM approach: prone, lateral, or supine with leg externally rotated
PL approach: CPN at risk (motor - foot drop)
PM approach: saphenous nerve at risk (sensory only)
PL interval: peroneus longus / soleus
PM interval: medial gastrocnemius / soleus
PM approach generally considered safer (sensory nerve only)
Both require buttress plating principle
COMMON TRAPS
✗Confusing which nerve is at risk in each approach
✗Not knowing the internervous planes
✗Saying one approach can access both fragments
✗Forgetting positioning requirements
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"When would you use both approaches together?"
"How do you protect the CPN in the posterolateral approach?"
"What is the prognosis of saphenous nerve injury?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 5: Soft Tissue Compromise

EXAMINER

"A patient has a posterolateral tibial plateau fragment but significant anterior soft tissue swelling and blistering. How does this affect your surgical planning?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Significance of Soft Tissue Injury: Blistering and significant swelling indicate high-energy injury mechanism. The anteromedial tibial skin is at highest risk (subcutaneous bone, poor vascularity). Operating through compromised skin dramatically increases infection risk (up to 20-30% with poor soft tissue timing).

Soft Tissue Assessment: Examine the entire circumference of the knee and proximal tibia. Differentiate serous blisters (intact epidermis) from hemorrhagic blisters (deeper injury). The posterolateral skin over the fibula may be spared even with significant anteromedial swelling.

Timing Decision: Apply the wrinkle test - gently compress skin to assess for wrinkling which indicates adequate dermal blood flow for healing. Typically need to wait 7-14 days for soft tissue recovery. Wait until swelling resolved, blisters re-epithelialized, and wrinkle test positive.

Interim Management: If fracture unstable, apply spanning external fixator (temporary knee-spanning construct). Elevate limb above heart level. Splint for comfort. Serial neurovascular checks. Counsel patient about delayed definitive surgery and reasons.

Staged Surgery Option: If posterolateral skin is healthy but anterior skin compromised, may proceed with posterolateral approach first to address PL fragment, then delay anterolateral approach until anterior soft tissue recovery. This allows partial stabilization while awaiting optimal conditions for complete fixation.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Blisters and swelling indicate high-energy injury
Anteromedial skin most at risk (subcutaneous bone)
Posterolateral skin usually less compromised
Delay surgery until wrinkle test positive (7-14 days)
Interim management: spanning external fixator if unstable
Elevation, ice, splinting while waiting
May be able to proceed with PL approach if posterior skin OK
Could stage surgery: PL first, AL/AM later when anterior skin recovered
COMMON TRAPS
✗Operating through compromised skin (high infection risk)
✗Not using external fixator for interim stability
✗Ignoring the wrinkle test
✗Not counseling patient about delayed surgery and reasons
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the wrinkle test?"
"How long would you typically wait for soft tissue recovery?"
"What are the signs of compartment syndrome to watch for?"

TIBIA POSTEROLATERAL APPROACH

High-Yield Exam Summary

Patient Position

  • •PRONE position essential for posterolateral tibia access
  • •Alternative: lateral decubitus with affected side up
  • •CANNOT access PL tibial plateau from supine position
  • •Pad all pressure points (face, chest, pelvis, knees)
  • •Radiolucent table for fluoroscopy access

CPN Protection

  • •CPN wraps around fibular neck 1-2cm distal to head
  • •IDENTIFY EARLY - before any retraction
  • •Vessel loop or tape sling for protection
  • •NO metal retractors directly on nerve
  • •Knee flexion relaxes nerve tension

Internervous Plane

  • •Between peroneus longus (superficial peroneal n.) and soleus (tibial n.)
  • •Inter-compartmental plane between lateral and posterior compartments
  • •Retract peroneus longus anteriorly with CPN
  • •Retract soleus and gastrocnemius posteriorly
  • •Subperiosteal dissection exposes PL tibial plateau

Buttress Plate Principle

  • •PL fragment displaces posteriorly under axial load
  • •Buttress plate on POSTERIOR surface prevents displacement
  • •Anterolateral plate CANNOT buttress PL fragment
  • •3.5mm T-plate, L-plate, or anatomic PL plate
  • •Screws directed anteriorly and medially

CT Planning

  • •CT ESSENTIAL for all tibial plateau fractures
  • •PL fragments missed in 15-20% on plain films
  • •Three-column concept guides approach selection
  • •Less than 2mm articular step-off is the goal
  • •CT post-op if any concern about reduction

Complications

  • •CPN injury 3-5% (most recover within 12 months)
  • •Post-traumatic OA 20-40% long-term
  • •Infection 2-5% (higher with soft tissue compromise)
  • •Fibular nonunion if osteotomy performed (5%)
  • •DVT prophylaxis until mobile (minimum 2-6 weeks)
Quick Stats
Complexityadvanced
Reading Time25 min
Updated2024-12-24
Related

Browse all procedures

View full catalog