Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • For Training Programs
  • Authors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Methodology
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Back to Operative Surgery
Adult Reconstruction

Total Hip Arthroplasty - Primary (Uncemented)

Comprehensive surgical technique guide for primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty via the posterior approach with AOANJRR context for FRCS exam preparation

Core Procedure
advanced
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Orthopaedic clinicians and medical editors • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Editorial boardMethodologyReview policyReport a correction
High Yield Overview

TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY - PRIMARY (UNCEMENTED)

Posterior approach (Moore/Southern) most common in Australia - curved incision centered over greater trochanter, extended posteriorly. Split gluteus maximus. Expose short external rotators. Alternatively: Anterolateral (Watson-Jones/Hardinge), Direct Anterior (muscle-sparing), or Lateral (Hardinge) approaches. | advanced

arthroplastySubspecialty
15Key Steps
5Danger Zones
60-90minDuration

Critical Must-Knows

  • End-stage hip arthritis (osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, AVN) causing pain and functional limitation unresponsive to conservative management - also indicated for displaced femoral neck fractures in active elderly (age over 70-75 years) or selected younger patients with poor bone quality
  • Lewinnek safe zone for acetabular cup positioning: 30-50° inclination, 10-30° anteversion - cups outside this zone have higher dislocation rates (15% vs 4%)
  • Combined anteversion concept: femoral stem anteversion plus cup anteversion equals combined 25-50° per Ranawat safe zone - prevents impingement and instability
  • AOANJRR data: uncemented THA has 95% survivorship at 15 years - highly cross-linked polyethylene reduces revision rate by 30% compared to standard polyethylene at 10 years

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Know Lewinnek safe zone numbers precisely (30-50° inclination, 10-30° anteversion) - examiners expect exact values, not ranges like 'around 40 degrees'
  • "
    Understand AOANJRR data: uncemented cups outperform cemented cups, HXLPE superior to standard PE, 32-36mm heads have similar low revision rates, dislocation is leading cause of early revision
  • "
    Be able to describe posterior approach advantages (familiar anatomy, extensile, spares abductors) and disadvantages (dislocation risk 10-15% without repair, requires robust soft tissue repair)
  • "
    Know combined anteversion concept and Ranawat safe zone (25-50° total) - prevents impingement and instability by balancing femoral and acetabular version

Critical Danger Structures

Danger 1

Sciatic nerve. Location: Posterior to hip joint, courses 15-30mm posterior to posterior capsule. Protection: Avoid excessive posterior retraction, gentle tissue handling, identify nerve in revision cases, avoid prolonged abnormal positioning during dislocation, limit leg lengthening to less than 15mm

Danger 2

Superior gluteal nerve and vessels. Location: Exit pelvis through greater sciatic notch above piriformis, run between gluteus medius and minimus. Protection: Limit dissection to less than 5cm proximal to greater trochanter tip, avoid superior retractor migration, identify before extending incision proximally

Danger 3

Femoral neurovascular bundle. Location: Anterior to hip joint, medial to anterior hip capsule and femoral neck. Protection: Careful placement of anterior acetabular retractor (stay on bone, not into pelvis), avoid anterior perforation during acetabular reaming, gentle medial capsular release

Danger 4

Obturator neurovascular bundle. Location: Passes through obturator foramen inferior-medial to acetabulum. Protection: Avoid inferior acetabular retractor migration medially, careful inferior reaming, avoid screws in inferior quadrant

Danger 5

External iliac vessels. Location: Anterior to hip joint along pelvic brim, at risk with anterior acetabular screws. Protection: Safe screw zones are anterosuperior (10-2 o'clock) and posterosuperior - avoid anterior horizontal screws, limit screw penetration to 20mm beyond cortex, use fluoroscopy for anterior screws

Mnemonic

LEWINNEKLEWINNEK Safe Zone for Cup Positioning

L
Lateral opening 40-45° (inclination/abduction)
Lateral opening 40-45° (inclination/abduction)
E
Expect anteversion 15-20° (middle of range)
Expect anteversion 15-20° (middle of range)
W
Wide inclination range 30-50° acceptable
Wide inclination range 30-50° acceptable
I
Inclination over 50° causes edge loading
Inclination over 50° causes edge loading
N
Need version 10-30° (anteversion range)
Need version 10-30° (anteversion range)
N
Never exceed combined version 50° (with stem)
Never exceed combined version 50° (with stem)
E
Ensure no retroversion (less than 10°)
Ensure no retroversion (less than 10°)
K
Keep dislocation risk low (4% vs 15% outside zone)
Keep dislocation risk low (4% vs 15% outside zone)
Mnemonic

ACETABULARACETABULAR Reaming Principles

A
Anatomic landmarks guide version (transverse acetabular ligament)
Anatomic landmarks guide version (transverse acetabular ligament)
C
Center of rotation - restore native or slightly medialize
Center of rotation - restore native or slightly medialize
E
Expose entire acetabulum (anterior, posterior, inferior walls)
Expose entire acetabulum (anterior, posterior, inferior walls)
T
Two millimeters under-ream for press-fit stability
Two millimeters under-ream for press-fit stability
A
Anteversion 10-30° (middle range 15-20° safest)
Anteversion 10-30° (middle range 15-20° safest)
B
Bleeding bone over 70% hemisphere for ingrowth
Bleeding bone over 70% hemisphere for ingrowth
U
Under 50° inclination to prevent edge loading
Under 50° inclination to prevent edge loading
L
Lateral wall preserve - stay lateral to teardrop
Lateral wall preserve - stay lateral to teardrop
A
Avoid medialization through floor into pelvis
Avoid medialization through floor into pelvis
R
Ream incrementally 2mm at a time for control
Ream incrementally 2mm at a time for control

Positioning and Preparation

Patient Position: Lateral decubitus position with affected side up. Pelvis stabilized with anterior support against pubis and posterior support against sacrum - must be perpendicular to floor (verify with level). All bony prominences well-padded including axillary roll caudal to axilla (not in axilla to avoid brachial plexus injury), pillows between knees, fibular head padding. Arms positioned on arm boards or chest support. Contralateral leg slightly flexed at hip and knee.

Surgical Approach: Posterior approach (Moore/Southern) most common in Australia (approximately 60% per AOANJRR). Alternatively: Direct Anterior (20%), Hardinge lateral (15%), Watson-Jones anterolateral (5%). Posterior approach advantages: familiar anatomy, extensile, spares abductors. Disadvantages: higher dislocation risk without repair (10-15% vs 2-5% anterior), requires robust soft tissue repair.

Incision: Curved incision centered over greater trochanter, extending 8-10cm proximally-posteriorly along gluteus maximus fibers, then 3-5cm distally along femoral shaft. Mark incision with skin marker before draping.

Acetabular Exposure and Reaming Technique

Exposure Principles

Complete acetabular exposure requires three retractors in standard positions:

Anterior retractor (12 o'clock): Hohmann over anterior wall - stay on bone to avoid femoral vessels

Inferior retractor (3 o'clock left hip, 9 o'clock right hip): Broad retractor over inferior wall - protect obturator neurovascular bundle

Posterior retractor (6 o'clock): Hohmann around posterior wall - avoid excessive retraction (sciatic nerve 15-30mm posterior)

Sequential Reaming Steps

  1. Remove all soft tissue: Labrum circumferentially, osteophytes (especially posterior-inferior), ligamentum teres remnant, transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) can be preserved as version guide

  2. Start small: Initial reamer 38-40mm typically, engage all quadrants

  3. Incremental progression: Ream 2mm at a time until bleeding subchondral bone visible over greater than 70% of hemisphere

  4. Orientation: 40-45° inclination (from horizontal), 15-20° anteversion (middle of safe zone is safest)

  5. Final size: Under-ream by 1-2mm for press-fit (e.g., if final reamer is 56mm, use 54-55mm cup)

Anatomic Landmarks for Version

Transverse acetabular ligament (TAL): Connects anterior and posterior horns of acetabulum, typically oriented 15-25° anteverted - useful intraoperative reference

Patient position: If pelvis perpendicular to floor, cup aimed 15-20° anterior to coronal plane

Lateral decubitus reference: Some surgeons use 45° from vertical as target (combines inclination and version)

Exam Pearl

Technical Tip: EXAM KEY - Acetabular reaming goals are threefold: 1) Create hemisphere of bleeding subchondral bone for biological fixation (bony ingrowth), 2) Achieve accurate orientation within Lewinnek safe zone (30-50° inclination, 10-30° anteversion), 3) Maximize bone preservation (stay lateral to medial wall, avoid over-reaming). Common errors: medialization through floor (alters biomechanics, risks pelvic structures), excessive inclination over 50° (edge loading, accelerated wear), inadequate exposure (malposition).

Press-Fit Principles

Modern uncemented cups rely on initial press-fit stability (micromotion less than 50 microns allows ingrowth). Under-reaming by 1-2mm creates interference fit. Porous coating or hydroxyapatite promotes ingrowth. Supplemental screws provide initial stability but do not improve long-term fixation per AOANJRR data - use 2-3 screws in safe zones if concerned about initial stability.

Acetabular Reaming Dangers

  • Medialization through medial wall into pelvis (vascular injury, protrusio) - especially thin bone in inflammatory arthritis, protrusio, osteoporosis
  • Anterior retractor migration into pelvis (external iliac vessels, obturator vessels)
  • Excessive inclination over 50° (edge loading, increased wear, squeaking with ceramic)
  • Inadequate inclination under 30° (posterior instability, reduced cup coverage)
  • Excessive anteversion combined with anteverted stem (anterior instability)
  • Inadequate anteversion with retroverted stem (posterior instability)

Femoral Canal Preparation and Stem Insertion

Exposure of Proximal Femur

After hip dislocation and femoral neck osteotomy, expose proximal femur:

Remove remaining neck: Rongeur or osteotome to remove remaining neck back to base

Clear soft tissue: Remove soft tissue from greater trochanter, calcar, and canal opening

Protect anteriorly: Hohmann retractor over anterior femoral neck protects femoral vessels

Retract posteriorly: Hohmann around posterior calcar improves visualization

Canal Preparation Technique

  1. Open canal: Box chisel or curved curette to open proximal canal - aim down femoral shaft axis (slight valgus, 10-15° anteversion)

  2. Canal finder: Insert to confirm trajectory and version - should aim down canal without cortical impingement

  3. Sequential broaching: Start small (size 1-3 depending on canal size), progressively increase until:

    • Tight metaphyseal fit (no toggle)
    • Broach shoulder/collar sits flush on calcar cut
    • Appropriate fill of metaphyseal flare
  4. Version assessment: Most modern stems have built-in 10-15° anteversion - broach handle orientation indicates final stem version

  5. Stability test: Final broach should not toggle with rotation or axial force

Stem Design Considerations

Metaphyseal-filling stems (e.g., Corail, Taperloc): Fill proximal metaphysis, load calcar, immediate press-fit stability, suit normal anatomy

Tapered wedge stems (e.g., Accolade II): Progressive taper, rely on 3-point fixation, versatile for varied anatomy

Anatomic stems: Replicate native femoral anatomy with offset, anteversion, version options

Exam Pearl

Technical Tip: EXAM KEY - Femoral preparation goals: achieve stable metaphyseal press-fit (uncemented), correct version (combine with cup for total 25-50°), restore offset and leg length. Modern uncemented stems are metaphyseal-fitting (proximal fill, proximal load transfer) versus older diaphyseal-fitting stems. Combined anteversion concept: femoral stem anteversion plus acetabular cup anteversion should equal 25-50° (Ranawat safe zone) - if cup has 20° anteversion, stem should have 10-15° anteversion. Under-prepare canal (stem too proud) risks periprosthetic fracture. Over-prepare (stem too small) loses press-fit stability.

Uncemented Stem Insertion

Final stem selection: Typically same size as final broach or one size smaller (manufacturer-specific)

Coating types:

  • Grit-blasted titanium (promotes friction and ingrowth)
  • Hydroxyapatite coating (enhances early bone apposition)
  • Porous coating (allows bony ingrowth into pores 100-400 microns)

Insertion technique: Gentle impaction with mallet, avoid excessive force, assess seating with each blow, final position should match broach position exactly

Intraoperative fracture risk: Higher in osteoporotic bone, varus femur, tight fit - consider cemented stem if very osteoporotic

Femoral Preparation Dangers

  • Femoral perforation during broaching (especially anterior cortex in flexed femur, varus anatomy)
  • Periprosthetic fracture during stem insertion (osteoporotic bone, excessive force)
  • Excessive femoral anteversion combined with cup anteversion (anterior instability)
  • Inadequate anteversion with retroverted cup (posterior instability)
  • Stem not fully seated (proud stem, high shoulder increases fracture risk)
  • Over-reaming canal (loss of press-fit, subsidence, thigh pain)

Implant Selection and Bearing Surfaces

Acetabular Component Selection

Cup sizing: Final reamed size minus 1-2mm for press-fit (e.g., 56mm reamer uses 54-55mm cup depending on manufacturer)

Porous coating: Titanium plasma spray, trabecular metal, or porous titanium for ingrowth

Screw holes: Multiple screw holes allow supplemental fixation - use 2-3 screws in safe zones if needed

Cup geometry: Hemispherical cups most common, some designs have peripheral self-locking features

Femoral Head Selection

Head size options:

  • 28mm: Historical standard, lowest volumetric wear, highest dislocation risk (rarely used now)
  • 32mm: Standard for most primary THA, good stability-wear balance
  • 36mm: Increasingly popular, better stability (greater jump distance), minimal wear increase with HXLPE
  • 40mm: Very stable, consider for recurrent dislocation, some concern for volumetric wear

AOANJRR data: 32mm and 36mm heads have similar low revision rates - both acceptable choices

Head offset: Varies by manufacturer (short, standard, long, extra-long neck) - restore native offset for abductor tension and stability

Bearing Surface Combinations

Critical Yield Data
Metal-on-HXLPE
Ceramic-on-HXLPE
Ceramic-on-Ceramic
Metal-on-Metal

Exam Pearl

Technical Tip: EXAM KEY - Bearing surface selection based on patient factors. Young active patients (under 50): consider ceramic-on-HXLPE or ceramic-on-ceramic for lowest wear. Standard patients (50-75): metal head on HXLPE is evidence-based choice with best AOANJRR data. Elderly low-demand (over 75): standard polyethylene acceptable (cost savings, minimal wear concern in limited lifespan). Metal-on-metal is obsolete - do not use. HXLPE has revolutionized THA longevity - AOANJRR shows 30% reduction in revision versus standard PE at 10 years.

Trialing and Stability Assessment

Component Assembly for Trial

  1. Femoral component: Final broach left in situ OR trial stem inserted (manufacturer-dependent)

  2. Trial head selection: Select head size (32mm or 36mm typically) and offset (short/standard/long) based on preoperative templating

  3. Acetabular liner: Already inserted in acetabular shell (HXLPE liner impacted and locked)

  4. Trial reduction: Assemble components and reduce hip carefully

Systematic Stability Testing

Posterior stability test (most critical for posterior approach):

  • Hip in extension and neutral rotation
  • Apply posterior translation force on femur
  • Should have 40-50mm of excursion (translation) before head dislocates posteriorly
  • If dislocates easily: insufficient offset, cup malposition, or inadequate head size

Anterior stability test:

  • Hip in extension and maximum external rotation
  • Apply anterior translation
  • Should not dislocate anteriorly (less common than posterior dislocation)

Impingement testing:

  • Flex hip 90°, adduct 15°, internally rotate 70° (should not dislocate or impinge posteriorly)
  • Extend hip, externally rotate 40° (should not impinge anteriorly)
  • Full range screening: flexion 110°, extension 10°, abduction 45°, adduction 30°, IR/ER 40° in extension

Leg Length Assessment

Clinical measurement:

  • Compare knee heights with legs parallel and pelvis level
  • Palpate ASISs and compare distances to medial malleoli bilaterally
  • Can use ruler from ASIS to medial malleolus

Radiographic measurement: Some surgeons use intraoperative fluoroscopy to measure from ischial tuberosity to lesser trochanter

Target: Equal length or up to 5mm lengthening (overlengthening better tolerated than shortening for stability)

Nerve palsy risk: Lengthening greater than 15mm significantly increases sciatic nerve palsy risk - revise if over-lengthened

Offset Assessment

Clinical signs of appropriate offset:

  • Good abductor tension (firm resistance when pulling leg inferiorly)
  • Hip feels stable with normal excursion
  • Normal soft tissue envelope tension

Insufficient offset: Hip feels unstable, reduced excursion, soft tissue laxity, postoperative limp and instability

Excessive offset (overstuffing): Limited ROM, tight reduction, increased soft tissue tension, postoperative pain

Exam Pearl

Technical Tip: EXAM KEY - Trialing determines final implant success - DO NOT RUSH. Systematic assessment: 1) Stability testing (shuck test, ROM testing), 2) Leg length measurement (clinical and/or radiographic), 3) Offset assessment (abductor tension). If unstable posteriorly: increase offset with longer neck, increase cup anteversion (if not already excessive), larger head size, or consider constrained liner. If unstable anteriorly: decrease cup anteversion, larger head. If leg length discrepancy: adjust head size/length or stem size. Warn patient preoperatively that perfect leg length equality may not be possible if needed for stability.

Wound Closure and Postoperative Protocol

Soft Tissue Repair - Critical for Posterior Approach

External rotator repair:

  • Using previously placed stay sutures in piriformis, obturator internus, gemelli
  • Repair to anatomic insertion on posterior greater trochanter
  • Use strong non-absorbable suture (Number 2 Ethibond or equivalent)
  • Place sutures through drill holes in greater trochanter if bone quality good
  • If osteoporotic bone: repair to soft tissue around vastus lateralis ridge

Posterior capsule repair:

  • Repair capsule to rotator cuff remnant or greater trochanter
  • Some surgeons perform capsular plication (tighten capsule) for enhanced stability
  • Tie repairs with hip in neutral position (NOT flexed/internally rotated)

Evidence for repair: Studies show dislocation rate 10-15% without posterior repair versus 2-4% with robust repair - repair is ESSENTIAL

Layered Closure

  1. Gluteus maximus fascia: Close with 0-Vicryl running or interrupted sutures

  2. Fascia lata and ITB: Close with 0-Vicryl, ensure good fascial closure to prevent hernia

  3. Subcutaneous layer: Close with 2-0 Vicryl to obliterate dead space

  4. Skin: Staples (easier removal, good for obese patients) OR subcuticular absorbable suture (better cosmesis) - similar infection rates per evidence

Drain Placement (Controversial)

Arguments against drains (majority current practice):

  • No reduction in hematoma formation per meta-analyses
  • Increased transfusion requirements
  • Possible increased infection risk
  • AOANJRR data shows no benefit

Arguments for drains (minority practice):

  • Significant bleeding concern
  • Oozing after closure
  • Anticoagulated patient

Current recommendation: Do NOT routinely use drains in uncomplicated primary THA

Postoperative Management

Immediate (Day 0-1):

  • Abduction pillow between legs in bed
  • VTE prophylaxis: Enoxaparin 40mg SC daily starting 6-12h postop OR rivaroxaban 10mg daily starting 6-12h postop
  • Multimodal analgesia: paracetamol 1g QID, celecoxib 200mg BD if no contraindication, oxycodone 5-10mg Q4h PRN, local infiltration analgesia
  • Mobilize with physiotherapy day 1 (walker or crutches)
  • Weight-bearing as tolerated (modern uncemented stems support immediate full weight-bearing)

Hip precautions (controversial):

  • Traditional teaching: avoid flexion greater than 90°, avoid adduction past midline, avoid internal rotation - for 6-12 weeks
  • Modern approach with robust posterior repair: NO hip precautions - evidence supports safety
  • Discuss approach with patient preoperatively

Discharge (Day 2-4):

  • When safe mobilization achieved
  • Pain controlled on oral medications
  • Home assessment completed if needed

Follow-up schedule:

  • 2 weeks: wound check, remove staples
  • 6 weeks: X-ray (AP pelvis and lateral hip), clinical assessment
  • 1 year: X-ray and clinical
  • Then per AOANJRR protocol: 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 years minimum

Exam Pearl

Technical Tip: EXAM KEY - Posterior soft tissue repair is CRITICAL for reducing dislocation risk from 10-15% to 2-4%. Repair must be robust: strong suture, bone tunnels in greater trochanter, tied with hip in neutral (not flexed). VTE prophylaxis is mandatory per Australian guidelines: 35 days of pharmacological prophylaxis (enoxaparin 40mg SC daily OR rivaroxaban 10mg daily) based on ACCP evidence that extended prophylaxis reduces late VTE events. Modern accelerated recovery protocols allow discharge day 2-4, return to driving 6 weeks, return to low-impact sports 3 months.

Complications - Recognition and Management

Major THA Complications

ComplicationRecognitionPreventionManagement
Dislocation (2-10% primary THA)Acute pain, deformity, leg shortening and rotation (posterior dislocation: flexed adducted internally rotated, anterior dislocation: extended abducted externally rotated), inability to bear weight, confirm with AP and lateral X-raysAccurate cup positioning (Lewinnek safe zone 30-50° inclination, 10-30° anteversion), restore offset and leg length, larger head size (32-36mm better than 28mm), robust posterior soft tissue repair if posterior approach, patient education on hip precautions if used, avoid combined version abnormalitiesFirst dislocation: closed reduction under sedation in emergency department, post-reduction X-ray and CT to assess component position, strict hip precautions 6-12 weeks, abduction brace. Recurrent dislocation (2 or more): CT scan to measure component version and identify impingement, if malpositioned - revision to correct position, if well-positioned - larger head, constrained liner, dual-mobility cup, or revision to different approach. AOANJRR: dislocation is leading cause of early revision
Deep infection/PJI (0.5-1.5% primary THA)Early (less than 3 weeks): wound drainage, erythema, fever, pain. Late chronic (greater than 3 weeks): pain with weight-bearing, elevated CRP/ESR, loosening on X-ray. Diagnosis: joint aspiration with culture, WBC count, CRP/ESR. MSIS criteria for PJI diagnosisAntibiotic prophylaxis (cefazolin 2g pre-incision, redose every 4h), strict sterile technique, laminar flow theater, minimize operating time under 90 minutes, meticulous hemostasis, copious irrigation (3L minimum), optimize patient factors (HbA1c under 7% in diabetics, smoking cessation, treat remote infections), consider dilute betadine irrigation (controversial)Early infection (less than 3 weeks): DAIR (debridement antibiotics implant retention) if components stable and organism favorable - remove liner/head, thorough debridement, exchange modular components, IV antibiotics 6-12 weeks, success rate 50-70%. Late chronic infection: usually requires two-stage revision - remove all implants, place antibiotic spacer, IV antibiotics 6 weeks, reimplant after infection cleared (success 85-90%). Single-stage revision for selected low-virulence organisms in Europe. AOANJRR: infection accounts for 15-20% of all THA revisions
Periprosthetic fracture (1-3% intraoperative, 1-2% postoperative over 10 years)Intraoperative: sudden loss of resistance during impaction, audible crack, visible fracture line, stem instability. Postoperative: acute pain after fall, inability to bear weight, X-ray shows fracture (AP and lateral plus obliques). Vancouver classification for femoral fractures guides treatmentCareful surgical technique, adequate femoral exposure, appropriate templating and sizing, recognize tight fits and adjust (do not force impaction), consider cemented stem in very osteoporotic bone (T-score less than -2.5), bisphosphonate therapy for bone health, fall prevention strategiesIntraoperative acetabular: if non-displaced and stable cup - supplemental screws in safe zones, protected weight-bearing 6 weeks. If displaced - plate fixation plus-minus revision to cup with augment. Intraoperative femoral: if non-displaced and stem stable - cerclage cables/wires, protected WBAT. If displaced or unstable - revision to long stem bypassing fracture plus-minus plate. Postoperative femoral per Vancouver: AG (greater trochanter) - ORIF if displaced. B1 (stable stem, good bone) - ORIF with plate. B2 (loose stem) - revision long stem plus-minus plate. B3 (loose stem, poor bone) - revision long stem plus allograft plus-minus plate. C (distal to stem) - ORIF with plate. AOANJRR: uncemented stems have higher periprosthetic fracture risk than cemented, especially in elderly osteoporotic patients
Leg length discrepancy (50% have greater than 5mm, 5-10% have greater than 15mm - leading cause of litigation)Postoperative: patient reports leg feels longer or shorter, asymmetric gait, back pain. Clinical: measure ASIS to medial malleolus bilaterally, compare knee heights supine, assess pelvic obliquity standing. Radiographic: measure vertical distance from ischial tuberosity to lesser trochanter on AP pelvis X-ray, compare to contralateral sidePreoperative templating (digital templating preferred over analog), intraoperative measurement (compare knee heights with legs parallel and pelvis level, measure ASIS to medial malleolus), use of leg length measuring devices or fluoroscopy, careful trialing before final implants. Aim for equal length or up to 5mm lengthening (better for stability than shortening). Discuss with patient preoperatively that perfect equality may not be possible if needed for stability/offsetIf detected intraoperatively during trialing: adjust head size/length, adjust stem size, or accept small difference if necessary for stability. Postoperative less than 10mm: most patients adapt, reassure. 10-15mm symptomatic: shoe lift (external in shoe or heel raise). Greater than 15mm symptomatic: consider shoe lift first, revision only for severe symptoms (greater than 20mm) and patient demand - revision is challenging surgery with risk of complications. Important: document discussion preop about possibility of LLD and need to balance with stability
Sciatic nerve palsy (0.1-1%, higher in posterior approach, revision, DDH)Foot drop (inability to dorsiflex ankle/toes), weakness of ankle plantarflexion, numbness in lateral leg and dorsum of foot. May be complete (all motor and sensory) or incomplete (partial function). Assess immediately postop and document (medicolegal). EMG/nerve conduction studies at 3 weeks if no recoveryAvoid excessive retraction posteriorly, protect nerve during exposure (identify in revision cases), avoid prolonged abnormal positioning during dislocation, limit leg lengthening to less than 15mm (lengthening greater than 15mm increases nerve palsy risk 10-fold), gentle tissue handling, ensure pelvis stable (pelvic motion during leg lengthening increases traction injury risk)Most are neurapraxias (stretch injury) that recover over 3-12 months. Immediate postop if nerve palsy detected: 1) Check leg length (if over-lengthened greater than 15mm, strongly consider revision to shorter construct within 24-48h), 2) Document deficit completely, 3) Ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) for foot drop, 4) Physiotherapy for ROM and strengthening. Monitor recovery with serial exams. EMG/NCS at 3 weeks (baseline) and 3 months (assess recovery). Neurology referral if no recovery by 3-6 months. If complete transection suspected (rare): exploration and nerve repair/grafting (rarely indicated, poor outcomes). Prognosis: 60-80% recover fully, 20-40% have permanent deficit (usually partial)
Venous thromboembolism - DVT and PE (without prophylaxis: DVT 40-60%, with prophylaxis: DVT 2-5%)DVT: leg pain, swelling, warmth, Homan sign (unreliable). Wells score for clinical probability. Duplex ultrasound for diagnosis (sensitivity 95% for proximal DVT). D-dimer if low probability (high sensitivity, low specificity). PE: dyspnea, chest pain, tachycardia, hypoxia. CTPA for diagnosisAll THA patients require pharmacological prophylaxis per Australian guidelines: LMWH (enoxaparin 40mg SC daily x 35 days starting 6-12h postop) OR DOAC (rivaroxaban 10mg daily x 35 days, apixaban 2.5mg BD x 35 days). Mechanical prophylaxis (TED stockings, pneumatic compression devices intraoperatively and postop). Early mobilization day 1. Adequate hydration. Extended prophylaxis 35 days proven to reduce late VTE events (ACCP guidelines)DVT: anticoagulation for 3-6 months (LMWH bridge to warfarin INR 2-3, OR direct oral anticoagulant). If contraindication to anticoagulation and proximal DVT: consider IVC filter. PE: anticoagulation 3-6 months, supportive care (oxygen, IV fluids). Massive PE with hemodynamic instability: thrombolysis (alteplase) or surgical embolectomy. EXAM KEY: VTE prophylaxis is MANDATORY for all THA patients. Australian guidelines specifically recommend 35 days pharmacological prophylaxis based on level 1 evidence
Aseptic loosening (cemented cups 10-20% at 15 years, uncemented cups less than 5% at 15 years)Progressive groin pain with weight-bearing (start pain indicates loosening), progressive radiolucent lines around component (greater than 2mm continuous), component migration (subsidence, change in position on serial X-rays), osteolysis (focal bone loss from particle disease). Infection must be ruled out (CRP, ESR, aspiration)Accurate surgical technique (press-fit for uncemented - 1-2mm under-ream, good cement technique for cemented - third generation), highly cross-linked polyethylene to reduce wear and osteolysis (AOANJRR shows 30% reduction in revision versus standard PE), appropriate patient selection (uncemented requires good bone stock), avoid excessive activity in young patients (counsel on activity modification)Asymptomatic radiographic loosening (radiolucent lines but no pain or progression): observe with serial X-rays 6-12 monthly, optimize bone health, activity modification. Symptomatic loosening (progressive pain, component migration): revision arthroplasty indicated. Preoperative workup essential: rule out infection (CRP, ESR, joint aspiration for culture, WBC, alpha-defensin), assess bone loss (CT scan), plan reconstruction (may need augments, bone graft, trabecular metal). EXAM KEY: Modern uncemented cups and stems have excellent survivorship greater than 95% at 15 years per AOANJRR. HXLPE has dramatically reduced osteolysis and late aseptic loosening
Heterotopic ossification/HO (radiographic 15-50%, clinically significant limiting ROM 5-10%)Progressive stiffness and reduced ROM weeks to months postoperatively, pain with ROM especially terminal range, AP pelvis X-ray shows ectopic bone formation around hip (Brooker classification I-IV, grade III-IV functionally significant). May present as failure to progress in physiotherapyRisk factors: male sex, prior HO, ankylosing spondylitis, DISH, post-traumatic arthritis, hypertrophic OA. Prophylaxis for high-risk patients: single-dose radiation (7-8 Gy within 24h pre or postop, avoid if young due to malignancy risk) OR indomethacin 75mg daily x 6 weeks (contraindicated if renal impairment, GI ulcer, may impair bone ingrowth - controversial). Routine prophylaxis NOT recommended for standard primary THA per AOANJRRBrooker I-II (minor HO, full ROM): no treatment required, observe. Brooker III-IV (severe HO limiting ROM and function): initially conservative with aggressive physiotherapy, NSAIDs for pain. If persistent severe limitation after 12-18 months: surgical excision once HO mature (bone scan cold, alkaline phosphatase normal, 12+ months from surgery) PLUS prophylaxis (radiation within 24h or indomethacin x 6 weeks) to prevent recurrence. Success rate 70-80% for improved ROM. EXAM KEY: Brooker classification - I (bone islands), II (greater than 1cm gap between ectopic bone and joint), III (less than 1cm gap), IV (ankylosis)

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 68-year-old woman with severe hip osteoarthritis asks about total hip replacement. Describe the Lewinnek safe zone and explain its clinical significance in preventing dislocation."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
The Lewinnek safe zone describes optimal acetabular cup positioning to minimize dislocation risk in total hip arthroplasty. It was defined by Lewinnek in 1978 based on radiographic analysis of 300 THAs. The safe zone parameters are: 40 degrees inclination (with acceptable range 30-50 degrees from horizontal) and 20 degrees anteversion (with acceptable range 10-30 degrees). Lewinnek's original study showed dislocation rate of 4% when cups positioned within the safe zone versus 15% when outside the zone - nearly 4-fold increase in dislocation risk. However, I would explain that modern understanding recognizes the safe zone as necessary but not sufficient - other factors also critical for stability including combined anteversion concept (femoral plus acetabular version should total 25-50 degrees per Ranawat), soft tissue repair quality especially in posterior approach, restoration of femoral offset and leg length, head size (larger heads 32-36mm more stable than 28mm), and patient-specific spinopelvic mobility. Current AOANJRR data confirms cup malposition remains leading cause of early dislocation requiring revision, emphasizing importance of accurate cup placement within safe zone.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Lewinnek safe zone defined as 40° inclination (range 30-50°) and 20° anteversion (range 10-30°) based on 1978 study of 300 hips
Original study showed 4% dislocation rate inside safe zone versus 15% outside zone - nearly 4-fold increase in dislocation with malpositioned cups
Safe zone necessary but not sufficient - also need combined anteversion 25-50° (Ranawat concept combining femoral and acetabular version)
Other stability factors: robust soft tissue repair (reduces posterior dislocation from 10-15% to 2-4%), restored offset/leg length, larger head size (32-36mm standard)
AOANJRR data confirms cup malposition leading cause of early revision for dislocation - accurate intraoperative positioning critical using anatomic landmarks or technology (navigation/robotics)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Stating vague ranges like 'around 40 degrees' instead of precise values (30-50° inclination, 10-30° anteversion) - examiners expect exact numbers
✗Not mentioning combined anteversion concept - cup version alone is insufficient, must balance with femoral stem anteversion for total 25-50°
✗Failing to acknowledge safe zone limitations - modern data shows up to 30% of dislocations occur with cups in safe zone due to other factors (spinopelvic, soft tissue, impingement)
✗Not discussing AOANJRR Australian registry data - examiners expect knowledge of local evidence showing dislocation as leading cause of early revision
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What would be your systematic approach to a patient with recurrent dislocation after THA, and how would you investigate the cause?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"You are planning primary THA for a 55-year-old active male with osteoarthritis. What does the AOANJRR data show regarding implant selection, specifically comparing cemented versus uncemented fixation and polyethylene options?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry is the world's leading registry tracking all joint replacements in Australia since 1999. For primary THA in a 55-year-old active male, AOANJRR data provides strong evidence for implant selection. For acetabular fixation, uncemented cups significantly outperform cemented cups - at 15 years, uncemented cups have cumulative revision rate approximately 5% versus cemented cups 10-15%, with hazard ratio of 2.5 favoring uncemented. For femoral fixation in patients under 65, both cemented and modern uncemented stems perform excellently with survivorship over 95% at 15 years, though uncemented stems have slightly higher early periprosthetic fracture risk (1-3%) especially in osteoporotic bone. For bearing surface, highly cross-linked polyethylene has revolutionized outcomes - AOANJRR shows 30% reduction in revision rate compared to standard polyethylene at 10 years, with annual wear less than 0.05mm versus 0.1-0.2mm for standard PE. For head size, 32mm and 36mm heads show similar low revision rates and both are acceptable - 36mm provides better stability but minimal wear difference with HXLPE. For this 55-year-old active patient, I would recommend: uncemented acetabular cup, uncemented femoral stem (if good bone stock), 32 or 36mm head, highly cross-linked polyethylene liner - this combination has best evidence for longevity per AOANJRR.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
AOANJRR is world-leading registry tracking all Australian joint replacements since 1999 - provides level 1 evidence for implant performance at population level
Uncemented acetabular cups outperform cemented cups - 5% versus 10-15% revision at 15 years (hazard ratio 2.5 favoring uncemented)
Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) shows 30% reduction in revision versus standard PE at 10 years - current evidence-based standard for most patients
Head size: 32mm and 36mm have similar low revision rates per AOANJRR - both acceptable, 36mm slightly better stability with negligible wear increase using HXLPE
For 55-year-old active patient: uncemented cup and stem, HXLPE liner, 32-36mm head provides best long-term survivorship based on registry data
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not knowing AOANJRR data specifically - examiners expect Australian candidates to know local registry evidence showing superior performance of uncemented cups and HXLPE
✗Recommending ceramic-on-ceramic for all young patients - while ultra-low wear, has risks (squeaking 5-10%, fracture less than 0.01%) and metal-on-HXLPE has excellent outcomes
✗Not mentioning metal-on-metal is obsolete - historical implants now known to cause ARMD (adverse reaction to metal debris) and pseudotumors, no longer used per AOANJRR recommendations
✗Failing to discuss patient-specific factors - age 55 with high activity demands versus elderly low-demand affects bearing choice (HXLPE standard but could consider ceramic head)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would your implant selection differ for an 80-year-old female with osteoporosis and limited mobility, and what is the evidence basis?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"Describe your systematic approach to trialing and stability assessment during primary THA via posterior approach. What would you do if the hip feels unstable posteriorly during trialing?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Trialing is the most critical intraoperative step for ensuring successful THA outcome - this is when I determine final implant sizes, confirm stability, and verify restoration of anatomy before committing to final components. My systematic approach includes three key assessments. First, stability testing - with hip in extension and neutral rotation, I perform the shuck test by applying posterior translation force on the femur, assessing excursion before dislocation. Normal hip should have 40-50mm of translation before dislocating posteriorly. I then test impingement: flex hip 90 degrees, adduct 15 degrees, internally rotate to 70 degrees - should not dislocate or impinge posteriorly. For anterior stability, extend hip and externally rotate 40 degrees - should not dislocate anteriorly. Second, leg length measurement - I compare knee heights with legs parallel and pelvis level, and measure ASIS to medial malleolus bilaterally, targeting equal length or up to 5mm lengthening. Third, offset assessment - I assess abductor tension by pulling leg inferiorly feeling for firm resistance, indicating appropriate soft tissue envelope. If the hip feels unstable posteriorly during trialing, I have systematic algorithm: increase offset using longer neck trial (improves soft tissue tension and jump distance), check cup position is not excessively retroverted (should be 15-20 degrees anteversion), consider larger head size (36mm instead of 32mm increases jump distance), verify femoral version is not excessive (combined anteversion should be 25-50 degrees), and if still unstable consider constrained liner or dual-mobility cup. I do NOT accept instability and close - this will result in postoperative dislocation.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Systematic trialing includes three assessments: 1) Stability testing (shuck test with 40-50mm excursion, impingement testing in multiple positions), 2) Leg length measurement (clinical comparison of knee heights and ASIS-malleolus), 3) Offset assessment (abductor tension with inferior leg pull)
Shuck test: hip extended neutral rotation, posterior translation should achieve 40-50mm excursion before dislocation - less than 30mm indicates instability risk
If unstable posteriorly: systematic algorithm - increase offset (longer neck), increase cup anteversion if retroverted, larger head (36-40mm), check combined version 25-50 degrees, consider constrained liner/dual-mobility
Leg length target: equal or up to 5mm lengthening (overlengthening better tolerated than shortening for stability). Lengthening over 15mm increases nerve palsy risk 10-fold - must avoid
NEVER accept unstable hip and close - will result in postoperative dislocation (2-10% incidence, leading cause of early revision per AOANJRR). Must address during trialing
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not having systematic approach to trialing - listing random checks instead of organized sequence (stability then leg length then offset)
✗Accepting marginal stability thinking it will improve after soft tissue repair - this leads to postoperative dislocation, must ensure robust stability during trialing
✗Not understanding combined anteversion concept - excessive cup anteversion alone does not fix posterior instability if stem is also anteverted (total over 50 degrees causes anterior instability)
✗Not knowing numeric targets: 40-50mm excursion, leg length within 5mm, combined version 25-50 degrees - examiners expect specific values not vague descriptions
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"If you detect the leg is 20mm longer than contralateral side during trialing, what are your options and what are the risks of accepting this length discrepancy?"

Total Hip Arthroplasty - Primary (Uncemented) - Exam Day Summary

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Indications

  • •End-stage hip arthritis (OA, inflammatory arthritis, AVN) with pain and functional limitation unresponsive to conservative management (NSAIDs, physiotherapy, activity modification, injections)
  • •Displaced femoral neck fractures in active elderly (over 70-75 years) or younger patients with poor bone quality precluding fixation
  • •Failed previous hip preservation surgery (osteotomy, arthroscopy)
  • •Rapidly destructive osteoarthritis or acute chondrolysis

Lewinnek Safe Zone (Memorize Numbers)

  • •Inclination: 40° (range 30-50°) from horizontal - over 50° causes edge loading, under 30° causes instability
  • •Anteversion: 20° (range 10-30°) - excessive causes anterior instability, inadequate causes posterior instability
  • •Original study: 4% dislocation inside safe zone versus 15% outside zone
  • •Safe zone necessary but not sufficient - also need combined anteversion 25-50°, soft tissue repair, restored offset

Combined Anteversion Concept

  • •Femoral stem anteversion PLUS acetabular cup anteversion should equal 25-50° (Ranawat safe zone)
  • •Example: cup 20° anteversion + stem 15° anteversion = 35° combined (safe)
  • •Excessive combined version (over 50°): anterior instability, excessive (over 50°): posterior instability
  • •Most modern stems have built-in 10-15° anteversion - combine with cup 15-20° anteversion for safe total

AOANJRR Key Data (Australian Evidence)

  • •Uncemented THA: 95% survivorship at 15 years (modern implants)
  • •Uncemented cups outperform cemented cups: 5% versus 10-15% revision at 15 years
  • •HXLPE reduces revision by 30% versus standard PE at 10 years - current evidence-based standard
  • •32mm and 36mm heads have similar low revision rates - both acceptable choices
  • •Dislocation is leading cause of early revision - emphasizes importance of accurate cup positioning and soft tissue repair
  • •Metal-on-metal bearings obsolete due to ARMD - no longer used

Danger Zones and Protection

  • •Sciatic nerve: 15-30mm posterior to capsule. Protect: avoid excessive posterior retraction, limit leg lengthening under 15mm, gentle tissue handling
  • •Superior gluteal nerve: exits greater sciatic notch above piriformis. Protect: limit proximal dissection to under 5cm from GT tip
  • •External iliac vessels: anterior along pelvic brim. Protect: safe screw zones anterosuperior (10-2 o'clock) and posterosuperior, avoid anterior horizontal screws
  • •Femoral neurovascular bundle: anterior to hip. Protect: careful anterior acetabular retractor placement on bone
  • •Obturator neurovascular bundle: inferior-medial through obturator foramen. Protect: avoid inferior retractor migration, no inferior screws

Critical Surgical Steps

  • •Pelvis positioning: MUST be perpendicular to floor - unstable pelvis causes cup malposition. Check with level
  • •Acetabular reaming: 2mm increments until bleeding bone over 70% hemisphere, under-ream by 1-2mm for press-fit, target 40-45° inclination and 15-20° anteversion
  • •Femoral preparation: progressive broaching until tight metaphyseal fit, no toggle, collar/shoulder flush on calcar
  • •Trialing: systematic assessment - stability (shuck test 40-50mm excursion), leg length (target equal or up to 5mm long), offset (abductor tension)
  • •Posterior repair: ESSENTIAL for reducing dislocation from 10-15% to 2-4%. Strong suture through bone tunnels, tie in neutral position

Top 3 Complications and Prevention

  • •Dislocation (2-10%): prevent with accurate cup position (safe zone), restore offset/leg length, larger head 32-36mm, robust posterior repair, patient education
  • •Infection (0.5-1.5%): prevent with antibiotic prophylaxis (cefazolin 2g pre-incision), sterile technique, minimize operative time, copious irrigation 3L, optimize patient factors (HbA1c under 7%, smoking cessation)
  • •Periprosthetic fracture (1-3% intraop): prevent with careful technique, adequate exposure, appropriate sizing, avoid excessive impaction force, consider cemented stem if very osteoporotic (T-score under -2.5)
  • •Nerve palsy (0.1-1%): prevent by limiting leg lengthening under 15mm, avoiding excessive retraction, gentle tissue handling, protecting nerves during exposure

Postoperative Protocol

  • •VTE prophylaxis MANDATORY: enoxaparin 40mg SC daily x 35 days OR rivaroxaban 10mg daily x 35 days per Australian guidelines (ACCP evidence for extended prophylaxis)
  • •Weight-bearing: as tolerated immediately with modern uncemented stems (press-fit supports full weight-bearing)
  • •Hip precautions: traditional teaching avoid flexion over 90°, adduction past midline, internal rotation for 6 weeks. Modern approach with robust posterior repair: NO precautions
  • •Follow-up: 2 weeks (wound), 6 weeks (X-ray + clinical), 1 year (X-ray + clinical), then per AOANJRR protocol (1, 3, 5, 7, 10 years)
  • •Return to activity: driving 6 weeks, low-impact sports 3 months, avoid high-impact sports (running, jumping)

Evidence-Based References

References

  1. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(2):217-220. doi:10.2106/00004623-197860020-00014

    • Original definition of acetabular safe zone (30-50° inclination, 10-30° anteversion) showing 4% dislocation rate inside versus 15% outside zone
  2. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2023 Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA; 2023.

    • Comprehensive Australian registry data: uncemented THA 95% survivorship at 15 years, HXLPE reduces revision by 30% versus standard PE, dislocation leading cause of early revision
  3. Ranawat CS, Maynard MJ. Modern techniques of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Tech Orthop. 1991;6(3):17-25.

    • Combined anteversion concept: femoral stem anteversion plus acetabular cup anteversion should total 25-50° (Ranawat safe zone) to prevent impingement and instability
  4. Abdel MP, von Roth P, Jennings MT, Hanssen AD, Pagnano MW. What safe zone? The vast majority of dislocated THAs are within the Lewinnek safe zone for acetabular component position. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(2):386-391. doi:10.1007/s11999-015-4432-5

    • Modern study showing 58% of dislocations occur with cups in Lewinnek safe zone - emphasizes multifactorial nature of stability including spinopelvic mobility, soft tissue repair, impingement
  5. Khatod M, Barber T, Paxton E, Namba R, Fithian D. An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:19-23. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000218752.22613.78

    • Large registry study: 32mm heads reduce dislocation versus 28mm heads (1.8% versus 2.9%), larger heads provide better stability through increased jump distance
  6. Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, et al. The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(2):319-329. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1487-1

    • Identifies risk factors for cup malposition including obesity, female sex, developmental dysplasia - emphasizes importance of accurate intraoperative positioning techniques
  7. Kurtz SM, Gawel HA, Patel JD. History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(8):2262-2277. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-1872-4

    • Systematic review: HXLPE reduces wear rate from 0.1-0.2mm/year (standard PE) to less than 0.05mm/year, dramatically reduces osteolysis and aseptic loosening
  8. White RE Jr, Forness TJ, Allman JK, Junick DW. Effect of posterior capsular repair on early dislocation in primary total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(393):163-167. doi:10.1097/00003086-200112000-00019

    • Prospective study: posterior capsule and external rotator repair reduces dislocation from 10% to 0% in posterior approach THA - emphasizes importance of robust soft tissue repair
  9. Falck-Ytter Y, Francis CW, Johanson NA, et al. Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):e278S-e325S. doi:10.1378/chest.11-2404

    • ACCP guidelines: extended pharmacological VTE prophylaxis for 35 days after THA reduces late VTE events - basis for Australian guideline recommendations
  10. Grammatopolous G, Pandit HG, da Assunção R, et al. Pelvic position and movement during hip replacement. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(7):876-883. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.32107

    • Spinopelvic mobility affects functional cup position - patients with stiff spines have altered pelvic tilt affecting cup version during sitting/standing, contributing to instability even with cups in radiographic safe zone
Quick Stats
Complexityadvanced
Reading Time25
Updated2025-12-26
Related

Browse all procedures

View full catalog