Adult Reconstruction

Total Hip Replacement - Posterior Approach (Moore/Southern)

Comprehensive surgical technique guide for total hip replacement via the posterior approach with evidence-based protocols and safety-critical points for FRCS exam preparation

Core Procedure
advanced
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

High Yield Overview

TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT - POSTERIOR APPROACH (MOORE/SOUTHERN)

Posterior (Southern/Moore) - most common approach in Australia (60% AOANJRR data). Internervous plane: Gluteus maximus split (dual innervation). | advanced

Critical Danger Structures - 5 Key Zones

Danger Zone 1: Sciatic Nerve

Location: 15-30mm posterior to piriformis tendon insertion at greater trochanter, courses between piriformis and superior gemellus, lies on posterior capsule

Protection: Maintain hip flexion to relax nerve, palpate digitally posterior to short external rotators before division, stay on bone during rotator release, avoid posterior retractor placement beyond capsule, limit hip extension during exposure

Danger Zone 2: Superior Gluteal Neurovascular Bundle

Location: 30-50mm proximal to greater trochanter tip, exits pelvis through greater sciatic notch above piriformis, runs between gluteus medius and minimus

Protection: Limit proximal dissection above 5cm from GT, split gluteus maximus in line with fibers only, avoid superior retractor placement in gluteal muscles, stay in surgical safe zone defined by GT boundaries

Danger Zone 3: Femoral Neurovascular Bundle

Location: 30-50mm medial to anterior acetabular rim, separated by anterior capsule and iliopsoas muscle, vulnerable with anterior retractor placement

Protection: Place anterior Hohmann retractor directly on bone over anterior acetabular wall, avoid medial retractor angulation, use blunt retractors with rounded tips, visualize retractor position during acetabular exposure

Danger Zone 4: Obturator Neurovascular Bundle

Location: Runs along medial wall of acetabulum 10-20mm from acetabular fossa, exits pelvis through obturator foramen, vulnerable during inferior retractor placement and medial reaming

Protection: Place inferior Hohmann in obturator foramen gently without excessive depth, avoid medial wall perforation during reaming, stop reaming when subchondral bleeding appears, avoid anteroinferior acetabular screw placement

Danger Zone 5: Medial Femoral Circumflex Artery

Location: 10-15mm medial to quadratus femoris and deep to short external rotators, provides dominant blood supply to femoral head, branches anteriorly along femoral neck

Protection: Release short external rotators directly from bone to minimize bleeding, use cautery on bone during rotator detachment, identify and cauterize ascending cervical branches during capsulotomy, maintain hemostasis before proceeding

Mnemonic

POSTERIORPOSTERIOR Approach Sequence

Mnemonic

PSOIQShort External Rotators - Superior to Inferior

Internervous Plane

Gluteus maximus split: True internervous plane due to dual innervation:

  • Superior portion: Inferior gluteal nerve (L5, S1, S2)
  • Inferior portion: Variable innervation from inferior gluteal nerve branches
  • Splitting muscle in fiber direction (superolateral to inferomedial) avoids nerve injury
  • Fibers run 45 degrees from vertical when patient in lateral position

Key Anatomical Relationships

Short External Rotators (Superior to Inferior)

Critical Yield Data
Piriformis
Superior Gemellus
Obturator Internus
Inferior Gemellus
Quadratus Femoris

Neurovascular Structures

Sciatic nerve: Exits pelvis through greater sciatic notch below piriformis (90% of population), lies on posterior hip capsule, 15-30mm posterior to piriformis insertion depending on patient anatomy and hip position. Hip flexion relaxes nerve and increases safe distance.

Superior gluteal neurovascular bundle: Exits above piriformis through greater sciatic notch, courses between gluteus medius and minimus. Safe surgical zone is within 5cm of greater trochanter tip. Injury causes Trendelenburg gait from gluteal denervation.

Medial femoral circumflex artery: Provides 70-80% of femoral head blood supply via lateral epiphyseal vessels. Runs deep to short external rotators, 10-15mm medial to quadratus femoris. Ascending cervical branches on femoral neck are encountered during capsulotomy.

Inferior gluteal artery: Accompanies sciatic nerve, supplies gluteus maximus. Branches encountered during deep dissection of gluteal muscle split.

Acetabular Landmarks

Transverse acetabular ligament (TAL): Bridges inferior acetabular notch, represents anatomic equator and floor of acetabulum. Critical reference for reaming depth - do not breach TAL or ream inferior to it. Also used as anteversion reference (perpendicular to TAL equals approximately 20 degrees anteversion).

Teardrop: Radiographic landmark representing medial acetabular wall. Visible on AP pelvis X-rays. Medializing cup to teardrop level restores anatomic hip center.

Fovea: Central depression in acetabular floor, ligamentum teres insertion. Identifies true center of acetabulum.

Acetabular notch: Inferior deficiency between anterior and posterior columns, bridged by TAL.

Capsular Anatomy

Posterior capsule is thickest portion of hip joint capsule, reinforced by zona orbicularis and ischiofemoral ligament. Primary posterior stabilizer when hip is flexed. Capsule attaches to acetabular rim peripherally and femoral neck distally (intertrochanteric line anteriorly, above intertrochanteric crest posteriorly).

Exam Pearl

Anatomical Correlation: "The posterior approach is termed 'internervous' due to gluteus maximus dual innervation, but it is NOT intermuscular - we split the muscle itself. The subsequent plane between short external rotators and capsule is neither internervous nor intermuscular - it's simply a surgical plane. The key is understanding this approach sacrifices posterior soft tissue stabilizers temporarily, requiring meticulous repair for stability."

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 72-year-old woman with severe primary hip OA is scheduled for THR. She asks about the posterior approach you plan to use and why you chose this approach over others. How do you explain the rationale, and what do you tell her about dislocation risk?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
I explain the posterior approach is the most common technique in Australia, used in 60% of hip replacements according to our national registry. The key advantages are: First, it provides excellent visualization of the hip socket (acetabulum), which helps me position the cup component accurately. Second, it preserves the hip abductor muscles (gluteus medius and minimus) which are critical for normal walking - unlike some other approaches that cut these muscles. Third, it's extensile, meaning if unexpected complexity arises during surgery, I can extend the exposure safely. Fourth, if revision surgery is ever needed in the future, the same approach facilitates re-operation. Regarding dislocation, I acknowledge the posterior approach historically had a 4-5% dislocation rate, but modern evidence shows that meticulous repair of the posterior soft tissues (capsule and rotator muscles) reduces this to approximately 1-2%. I will perform this repair with strong sutures at the end of the procedure. Additionally, optimal positioning of the implant components in the 'safe zone' (40-45 degrees inclination, 15-20 degrees anteversion), using a larger femoral head size (36mm rather than 28mm), and patient compliance with hip precautions for 6 weeks all further minimize dislocation risk to below 1%. I emphasize that with these evidence-based techniques, the posterior approach offers an excellent balance of surgical exposure, muscle preservation, and safety.
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"You are performing a posterior approach THR and during acetabular exposure you notice brisk bleeding from the inferior aspect of the acetabulum after placing the inferior Hohmann retractor. The bleeding is pulsatile. What is your most likely diagnosis and immediate management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This scenario describes injury to the obturator artery, which runs along the medial wall of the acetabulum and exits through the obturator foramen where the inferior Hohmann retractor is placed. The obturator artery arises from the internal iliac artery and can be a substantial vessel, particularly if it has an aberrant course (present in 20-30% of patients as corona mortis connecting to external iliac/inferior epigastric). My immediate management sequence is: First, do NOT remove the retractor immediately as this may increase bleeding - the retractor may be providing some tamponade. Second, communicate clearly with anesthesia that we have vascular injury requiring resuscitation (start fluid replacement, type and cross-match 4 units, inform blood bank of potential major hemorrhage protocol). Third, I place direct pressure with a pack around the retractor while maintaining visualization. Fourth, I carefully remove the retractor while prepared to control bleeding with a combination of packing, bipolar cautery to the bleeding source at the foramen, thrombin-soaked gelfoam, or bone wax if bleeding from bone. If bleeding is not controlled with local measures, I consider options including: placing a larger pack for tamponade and proceeding with rapid cup insertion (the cup itself may provide definitive tamponade against the bleeding vessel), requesting vascular surgery assistance for potential internal iliac ligation or vessel repair, or rarely, abandoning the procedure with packing and returning for staged completion once bleeding controlled. Prevention is always preferable: I place the inferior retractor gently without excessive depth, recognize higher risk in revision cases with distorted anatomy, and avoid anteroinferior acetabular screw placement in this danger zone.
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"During trial reduction in a posterior approach THR, you perform stability testing. The hip is stable with extension and external rotation, but when you test posterior stability with 90-degree flexion, internal rotation and adduction, the hip dislocates easily with minimal force and there is no firm endpoint. What are your differential diagnoses for this instability and how do you address it systematically?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This scenario describes isolated posterior instability (unstable posteriorly but stable anteriorly), indicating the problem is specifically with posterior soft tissue constraint and/or component positioning affecting posterior impingement. My systematic differential diagnosis approach considers: (1) Component malposition - excessive cup anteversion (greater than 30 degrees) allows posterior subluxation, vertical cup (greater than 55 degrees inclination) reduces coverage, combined anteversion issues (cup plus stem greater than 45 degrees total). (2) Inadequate posterior soft tissue - capsule torn and not available for repair, short external rotators avulsed from bone without adequate tissue for reattachment, quadratus femoris released unnecessarily. (3) Femoral factors - inadequate offset (hip feels 'loose'), insufficient head size (32mm less stable than 36mm), stem malposition in excessive anteversion. (4) Impingement - posterior neck-on-cup impingement levering head out anteriorly, osseous impingement from retained osteophytes. My systematic intraoperative correction sequence: First, I reassess cup position - if excessive anteversion or vertical inclination is evident, I revise the cup (this is the definitive solution for malposition and must not be compromised). Second, I increase femoral head size from 32mm to 36mm (+4mm 'jumbo head') which increases jump distance by approximately 30% and improves stability significantly. Third, I ensure adequate offset restoration using longer neck options or offset stem if available. Fourth, I verify no impingement by manually ranging the hip through full flexion/IR/adduction arc and feeling for hard stops or levering. Fifth, I assess posterior soft tissue quality - if capsule is deficient, I consider enhanced repair with transosseous tunnels, double-row technique, or incorporating fascia lata as augmentation. Sixth, if despite all measures instability persists, I consider dual mobility bearing (outer PE head reduces dislocation to less than 1%). The critical principle is that I do NOT accept instability and proceed to closure. Instability on the table invariably leads to postoperative dislocation. I must identify and correct the cause before final implantation.

Total Hip Replacement - Posterior Approach - Exam Day Essential Summary

High-Yield Exam Summary

References

  1. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2023 Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA, 2023. Available at: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2023

  2. Kwon MS, Kuskowski M, Mulhall KJ, Macaulay W, Brown TE, Saleh KJ. Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:34-38. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000218746.84494.df

  3. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(2):217-220.

  4. Ranawat CS, Maynard MJ. Modern techniques of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Tech Orthop. 1991;6:17-25.

  5. Dorr LD, Malik A, Dastane M, Wan Z. Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(1):119-127. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0598-4

  6. Masonis JL, Bourne RB. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;(405):46-53. doi:10.1097/00003086-200212000-00006

  7. Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(3):282-288. doi:10.1054/arth.2002.30286

  8. Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(11):2456-2463. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02860

  9. Patel PD, Potts A, Froimson MI. The dislocating hip arthroplasty: prevention and treatment. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(4 Suppl 1):86-90. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.031

  10. Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (ANZHFR). Annual Report 2022. Adelaide: Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry Steering Group, 2022. Available at: https://anzhfr.org/annual-reports/