Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Chordoma

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Chordoma

Comprehensive guide to chordoma diagnosis, management, and surgical treatment for FRCS exam preparation

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25
High Yield Overview

CHORDOMA

Notochord Remnant | Sacrum and Skull Base

NotochordEmbryonic origin
50%Sacral location
BrachyuryDiagnostic marker
WideMargin needed for cure

Histological Subtypes

Conventional
PatternMost common (80%)
TreatmentPhysaliferous cells
Chondroid
PatternBetter prognosis
TreatmentCartilaginous differentiation
Dedifferentiated
PatternWorst prognosis (5%)
TreatmentHigh-grade sarcomatous

Critical Must-Knows

  • Notochordal origin - remnants of embryonic notochord
  • Sacrum (50%), skull base (35%), mobile spine (15%)
  • Brachyury = pathognomonic nuclear marker (T-box transcription factor)
  • Wide resection is treatment of choice (intralesional = local recurrence)
  • Slow-growing but locally aggressive with high recurrence

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Physaliferous cells (bubbly cytoplasm) on histology
  • "
    S100 and cytokeratin positive
  • "
    Proton beam radiotherapy for unresectable
  • "
    10-year survival approximately 40-60%

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

4-panel histopathology: H&E showing physaliferous cells + IHC staining patterns
Click to expand
4-panel histopathology: H&E showing physaliferous cells + IHC staining patternsCredit: Unknown via Open-i (NIH) - PMC4829844 (CC BY 4.0)

Clinical Imaging

Sacral Chordoma Imaging and Pathology

Critical Chordoma Exam Points

Origin

Notochord remnant tumor. The notochord normally regresses during development leaving only the nucleus pulposus. Chordoma arises from residual notochordal cells, explaining axial skeleton location.

Location

Sacrum (50%): Most common. Skull base/clivus (35%): Second most common. Mobile spine (15%): Cervical most common mobile. Always midline/paracentral.

Histology

Physaliferous cells = pathognomonic (vacuolated, bubbly cytoplasm). Brachyury = nuclear marker specific for chordoma. Also S100+, cytokeratin+. Lobulated myxoid matrix.

Treatment

Wide surgical resection is only chance for cure. Intralesional margins lead to local recurrence. Proton beam radiotherapy for unresectable or adjuvant. Chemotherapy limited role.

At a Glance

Chordoma is a malignant tumor arising from embryonic notochord remnants, accounting for 50% at the sacrum, 35% at the skull base/clivus, and 15% in the mobile spine (cervical most common). Histologically, physaliferous cells (vacuolated, bubbly cytoplasm) are pathognomonic, and brachyury is a specific nuclear immunohistochemical marker (T-box transcription factor); tumors are also S100+ and cytokeratin+. Chordoma is slow-growing but locally aggressive with high recurrence rates—wide surgical resection with clear margins is the only chance for cure, as intralesional margins result in 50-90% local recurrence. Proton beam radiotherapy is used for unresectable tumors or as adjuvant therapy. Conventional chemotherapy has limited efficacy. Ten-year survival is approximately 40-60%.

Mnemonic

50-35-15Chordoma Location Distribution

50%
Sacrum
Most common location - coccyx and sacrum
35%
Skull base/clivus
Second most common - intracranial
15%
Mobile spine
Cervical most common in mobile spine

Memory Hook:Remember 50-35-15: Sacrum, Skull, Spine percentages decrease!

Mnemonic

PBSChordoma Histology Features

P
Physaliferous cells
Pathognomonic bubbly cytoplasm cells
B
Brachyury positive
Nuclear T-box transcription factor
S
S100 and cytokeratin
Also positive on immunostains

Memory Hook:PBS staining = Physaliferous, Brachyury, S100 for chordoma diagnosis!

Mnemonic

WIDEChordoma Treatment Principles

W
Wide margins
En bloc resection essential for cure
I
Intralesional = recurrence
Inadequate margins lead to 50-90% recurrence
D
Difficult locations
Sacrum and skull base challenging surgical sites
E
Excellent radiation option
Proton beam therapy for unresectable tumors

Memory Hook:Go WIDE with margins to cure chordoma - intralesional surgery fails!

Overview and Epidemiology

Chordoma is a rare, slow-growing but locally aggressive malignant bone tumor arising from remnants of the embryonic notochord. It represents approximately 1-4% of all primary malignant bone tumors and accounts for approximately 20% of primary spine tumors.

Definition

Chordoma is a primary malignant bone tumor originating from notochordal remnants. Despite being classified as a low-grade malignancy based on histologic appearance, chordomas demonstrate locally aggressive behavior with high rates of local recurrence and potential for distant metastasis.

Epidemiology

Incidence: Rare tumor with annual incidence of approximately 0.08 per 100,000 population. Approximately 300 new cases diagnosed annually in the United States.

Age distribution: Typically presents in adults with peak incidence in the 5th to 7th decades (50-70 years). Can occur in children (approximately 5% of cases), where skull base location is more common.

Sex predilection: Male predominance with male-to-female ratio of approximately 2:1.

Location distribution:

  • Sacrum: 50% (most common site)
  • Skull base (clivus): 35% (second most common)
  • Mobile spine: 15% (cervical greater than thoracic greater than lumbar)

The exclusive location in the axial skeleton reflects the embryologic distribution of notochord remnants.

Pathogenesis

The notochord is a transient embryonic structure that appears during the third week of gestation and serves as the primitive axial skeleton. It induces formation of the vertebral column and skull base, then normally undergoes complete regression by 8 weeks of gestation. The only normal remnant is the nucleus pulposus of intervertebral discs.

Chordoma arises from ectopic notochordal cell rests that persist after embryogenesis. These remnants are found in the axial skeleton, explaining why chordoma occurs exclusively in midline structures (sacrum, clivus, vertebrae). The tumor demonstrates notochordal differentiation with expression of brachyury, a T-box transcription factor essential for notochord development.

Genetics: Familial chordoma is rare but described. Duplications of the brachyury gene (TBXT) on chromosome 6q27 are associated with familial chordoma. Most cases are sporadic without identified hereditary pattern.

Pathophysiology

Molecular Biology

Brachyury expression: The defining molecular feature of chordoma is expression of brachyury (encoded by TBXT gene), a T-box transcription factor critical for notochord development. Brachyury is expressed in over 95% of chordomas and is considered pathognomonic. It is not expressed in morphologic mimics such as chondrosarcoma.

Genetic alterations: Chordomas demonstrate relatively simple karyotypes compared to other sarcomas. Common alterations include:

  • Loss of chromosome 1p (associated with worse prognosis)
  • Loss of 9p (CDKN2A/p16 locus)
  • Amplification or mutation of EGFR and PDGFR pathways
  • TP53 mutations in some cases

Growth characteristics: Despite low mitotic rate and bland cytologic features, chordomas are locally aggressive. They demonstrate:

  • Slow but persistent growth
  • Local invasion of bone and soft tissue
  • Entrapment of neurovascular structures
  • High local recurrence rates (30-50% even with adequate resection)
  • Late distant metastasis potential (10-40%, usually to lungs, bone, liver)

Histological Subtypes

Conventional (classic) chordoma: 80% of cases. Lobulated architecture with cords and sheets of tumor cells in abundant myxoid matrix. Characteristic physaliferous cells (physaliphorous = bubble-bearing) are large cells with vacuolated, bubbly cytoplasm containing glycogen and mucin. Nuclei are typically small, round, and bland. Mitotic figures are rare.

Chondroid chordoma: 5-15% of cases. Contains areas of hyaline cartilage in addition to typical chordoma features. More common in skull base. Historically considered to have better prognosis, though recent studies suggest similar outcomes to conventional type when adequately treated. Must distinguish from chondrosarcoma using brachyury immunostaining.

Dedifferentiated chordoma: Less than 5% of cases. Contains areas of high-grade sarcomatous transformation with increased cellularity, atypia, and mitotic activity. Worst prognosis with more aggressive behavior and higher metastatic potential. Can occur de novo or in recurrent tumors. Median survival approximately 1 year.

Poorly differentiated chordoma: Rare variant seen primarily in children and young adults. Lacks typical physaliferous cells. More aggressive clinical course.

Clinical Presentation

Sacral Chordoma

Presents with nonspecific symptoms leading to delayed diagnosis. Average symptom duration before diagnosis is 6-12 months.

Pain: Most common presenting symptom (70-80% of patients). Initially mild, intermittent sacral or coccygeal pain. Progressively worsens and becomes constant. May radiate to buttocks, hips, or lower extremities.

Neurological symptoms: Occur in approximately 50% at presentation. Include:

  • Radicular pain (L5, S1 dermatomes most common)
  • Motor weakness (foot drop from L5 involvement)
  • Sensory changes in saddle distribution
  • Bowel dysfunction (constipation most common)
  • Bladder dysfunction (urinary retention or incontinence)
  • Sexual dysfunction

Pelvic mass: Large tumors may cause palpable presacral mass on rectal examination. Anterior extension can cause:

  • Constipation or change in bowel habits
  • Urinary symptoms from bladder compression
  • Dyspareunia in women
  • Rectal bleeding (rare, suggests mucosal invasion)

Skull Base Chordoma

Presents earlier due to critical location.

Cranial nerve palsies: Most common presentation (60-70%). Abducens nerve (CN VI) most commonly affected, causing diplopia. Other cranial nerves can be involved depending on extension.

Headache: Present in 40-50% of patients. Typically retro-orbital or vertex headache.

Visual symptoms: Diplopia, visual field defects, decreased visual acuity.

Endocrine dysfunction: Large tumors can affect pituitary function causing hypopituitarism.

Nasal/pharyngeal symptoms: Nasal obstruction, epistaxis, dysphagia with anterior extension.

Mobile Spine Chordoma

Neck or back pain: Localized pain at tumor site. Initially mechanical, progressively worsens.

Radiculopathy: Nerve root compression causes dermatomal pain and neurological deficits.

Myelopathy: Spinal cord compression causes:

  • Upper motor neuron signs below level of lesion
  • Gait disturbance
  • Bladder and bowel dysfunction
  • Sensory level

Physical Examination

Inspection: May reveal visible/palpable mass in advanced cases.

Neurological examination:

  • Comprehensive motor examination (look for lower motor neuron signs from nerve root involvement)
  • Sensory testing (dermatomes, saddle anesthesia)
  • Reflexes (may be diminished with nerve root compression)
  • Rectal tone assessment
  • Perianal sensation

Rectal examination: Essential for sacral lesions. May palpate presacral mass - typically firm, fixed, smooth or lobulated.

Investigations

Laboratory Studies

Routine labs: Generally normal. CBC, basic metabolic panel to assess baseline function.

Tumor markers: No specific serum markers for chordoma. Alkaline phosphatase may be elevated but is nonspecific.

Imaging

MRI is the gold standard for chordoma assessment. Provides superior soft tissue detail, neural structure visualization, and extent of marrow involvement.

Typical MRI characteristics:

  • T1-weighted: Hypointense to isointense relative to muscle (due to high water content in myxoid matrix)
  • T2-weighted: Very hyperintense (bright signal from abundant mucoid/myxoid matrix)
  • T1 post-contrast: Heterogeneous enhancement with irregular pattern
  • Location: Midline or paracentral destructive lesion
  • Margins: Lobulated contour with internal septations
  • Soft tissue component: Usually large, often exceeds bony component

Sequences to obtain:

  • Sagittal T1 and T2 of entire spine (assess skip lesions)
  • Axial T1 and T2 through lesion
  • Coronal STIR or fat-suppressed T2
  • T1 post-gadolinium with fat saturation

MRI is essential for:

  • Defining extent of tumor
  • Assessing involvement of adjacent structures (dura, nerve roots, vessels)
  • Surgical planning (relationship to critical structures)
  • Post-treatment surveillance for recurrence

MRI provides the most comprehensive assessment for chordoma diagnosis and management planning.

CT imaging role:

Bone detail: Superior for assessing bone destruction pattern and matrix mineralization. Shows:

  • Midline lytic bone destruction
  • Cortical disruption
  • Soft tissue mass with bone fragments
  • Calcification (present in 30-70% of cases - flocculent or irregular pattern)
  • Trabecular bone destruction

Surgical planning: Helps define bony margins for resection planning. Assess sacral neural foramina involvement.

Chest CT: Mandatory for staging. Lungs are most common site of distant metastasis (30% of patients who develop metastases have pulmonary involvement).

CT features:

  • Expansile lytic lesion centered in bone
  • Soft tissue mass often larger than bone destruction suggests
  • Anterior soft tissue extension common (presacral space in sacral tumors)
  • Posterior extension through sacral foramina

CT is complementary to MRI and essential for assessing bone involvement and staging.

Limited utility but may show:

  • Sacral bone destruction with soft tissue shadow
  • Loss of normal sacral anatomy
  • Pathologic fracture (uncommon)
  • Calcification within mass

Often underestimates tumor extent. Should always proceed to cross-sectional imaging for suspected chordoma.

FDG-PET/CT:

  • Limited role in primary diagnosis (chordomas are typically low metabolic activity)
  • May help identify dedifferentiated areas (higher SUV)
  • Can detect distant metastases in follow-up
  • Useful for assessing recurrence versus post-treatment changes

Whole-body MRI: Emerging role for detecting skip lesions and distant bone metastases.

Angiography: Rarely needed. May be considered for preoperative embolization of hypervascular tumors or to assess vascular involvement/anatomy for complex resections.

Tissue Diagnosis

Biopsy indications: Tissue diagnosis mandatory before definitive treatment. Clinical and imaging features alone cannot definitively diagnose chordoma.

Biopsy technique: Image-guided core needle biopsy preferred (CT or fluoroscopy guidance). Considerations:

  • Plan biopsy tract to allow en bloc excision with definitive surgery
  • Avoid contaminating uninvolved tissue planes
  • Obtain adequate tissue for histology and immunohistochemistry
  • Posterior approach typically used for sacral lesions
  • Send fresh tissue if molecular studies planned

Open biopsy: Reserved for cases where core biopsy nondiagnostic or inadequate. Risks tumor contamination of surgical field.

Staging Investigations

Chest imaging: Chest CT required to exclude pulmonary metastases.

Whole spine imaging: MRI of entire spine to assess for skip metastases (rare but described).

Skeletal survey or bone scan: Consider if symptoms suggest other skeletal involvement.

Laboratory: Baseline renal and hepatic function for treatment planning.

Histopathology and Diagnosis

Gross Pathology

Lobulated, gelatinous gray-white to tan mass. Cut surface demonstrates mucoid, glistening appearance. Hemorrhage and necrosis uncommon except in dedifferentiated variants. Soft tissue component often extensive.

Microscopic Features

Chordoma histopathology showing physaliferous cells and immunohistochemistry
Click to expand
Chordoma histopathology (4-panel): (A) H&E showing pathognomonic physaliferous (vacuolated) cells with 'soap bubble' cytoplasm arranged in cords within myxoid matrix, (B-D) Immunohistochemistry demonstrating characteristic staining patterns - brown positive nuclear/cytoplasmic staining patterns used for diagnosis confirmation.Credit: Gellner V et al., Sci Rep - CC BY

Architecture: Lobular growth pattern separated by fibrous septae. Cords, nests, and sheets of tumor cells in abundant extracellular myxoid matrix.

Cytology:

  • Physaliferous cells: Pathognomonic feature. Large cells with abundant, vacuolated, bubbly cytoplasm (vacuoles contain mucin and glycogen). Cytoplasmic vacuoles push nucleus to periphery creating signet-ring appearance in some cells.
  • Nuclei: Small, round to oval, centrally or eccentrically placed. Minimal pleomorphism in conventional type.
  • Mitotic activity: Rare mitotic figures (fewer than 1 per 10 high-power fields in conventional type).

Matrix: Abundant extracellular myxoid/mucoid matrix rich in proteoglycans. Matrix stains with Alcian blue (blue) and mucicarmine (pink).

Immunohistochemistry

Brachyury (T-brachyury): DIAGNOSTIC MARKER. Nuclear expression in over 95% of chordomas. Highly specific - positive only in chordoma and normal notochord. Negative in chondrosarcoma and other mimics. This is the single most important immunostain to confirm diagnosis.

S100 protein: Positive in 80-100% of cases. Strong, diffuse nuclear and cytoplasmic staining. Also positive in chondrosarcoma (thus not specific).

Cytokeratin: Positive in 80-100%. Includes low molecular weight keratins (CAM 5.2, AE1/AE3). Dot-like paranuclear pattern characteristic.

EMA (epithelial membrane antigen): Positive in most cases (70-90%).

Vimentin: Variably positive.

NEGATIVE stains: Desmin, smooth muscle actin, chromogranin, synaptophysin (helps exclude other tumor types).

Differential Diagnosis

Chondrosarcoma: Most important differential, especially for chondroid chordoma. Both can have cartilaginous matrix and S100 positivity. Brachyury distinguishes: positive in chordoma, negative in chondrosarcoma. Cytokeratin also typically negative in chondrosarcoma.

Metastatic carcinoma: Axial skeleton location and cytokeratin positivity can mimic metastatic adenocarcinoma. Brachyury negative in carcinomas. Clinical history and additional immunostains help.

Myxopapillary ependymoma: Occurs in sacrococcygeal region, can have myxoid matrix. Lacks physaliferous cells and brachyury positivity. GFAP positive (negative in chordoma).

Ecchordosis physaliphora: Benign notochordal remnant typically found incidentally at clivus. Small (less than 2 cm), no bone destruction, identical histology to chordoma. Clinical and imaging features distinguish.

Management Algorithm

Core Principles

Wide surgical resection is the only curative treatment. The margin achieved is the single most important prognostic factor for local control and survival. Intralesional surgery (tumor violation during resection) results in 50-90% local recurrence.

Goals of surgery:

  • En bloc resection with wide margins (negative margins on all surfaces)
  • Preservation of neurologic function when possible
  • Maintain structural stability
  • Minimize morbidity

Radiation therapy role: Used when wide resection not feasible or for positive margins. Proton beam or carbon ion therapy preferred over conventional photon radiation.

Chemotherapy: No proven role for conventional chemotherapy. Chordomas are not chemosensitive.

These principles apply to all chordoma treatment decisions.

Treatment Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
chordoma management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for chordomaCredit: OrthoVellum
Clinical Algorithm— Chordoma Management Algorithm
Loading flowchart...

En bloc resection with negative margins achieves best outcomes but remains technically challenging due to anatomic location. Targeted therapies are under investigation for recurrent cases.

Surgical Management

Sacral Chordoma Surgery

Preoperative planning:

  • Define tumor extent with MRI (relationship to S2-S3 junction critical)
  • Assess vascular anatomy (iliac vessels, presacral plexus)
  • Counsel patient on functional outcomes (bowel, bladder, sexual function)
  • Optimize medical status
  • Consider preoperative embolization for large hypervascular tumors

Functional considerations:

  • S1 nerve roots: Bilateral preservation essential for walking. Unilateral sacrifice causes foot drop.
  • S2 nerve roots: Bilateral preservation maintains bladder and bowel function. Bilateral sacrifice requires permanent catheterization and often colostomy.
  • S3 and below: Sacrifice causes varying degrees of dysfunction but generally better tolerated than S2.

High sacrectomy (above S2-S3): Requires sacrifice of S2-S3 roots with significant functional impact. Reserved for high tumors where necessary for margins.

Low sacrectomy (S3 and below): Preserves S1-S2 roots with better functional outcomes. May still have bowel/bladder/sexual dysfunction but less severe.

Surgical approach:

Combined anterior-posterior approach: Most common for large sacral chordomas.

  • Anterior phase: Abdominal/pelvic approach. Mobilize rectum, ligate vessels, dissect presacral component.
  • Posterior phase: Patient repositioned prone. Complete osteotomy and remove specimen en bloc.
  • Staged procedures (anterior first, posterior days later) or single-stage both described.

Posterior-only approach: Feasible for smaller tumors without large anterior extension.

Technique pearls:

  • Use frozen sections to confirm negative margins
  • Preserve as many nerve roots as feasible while achieving negative margins
  • Lumbopelvic reconstruction needed for high sacrectomy (spinopelvic fixation)
  • Soft tissue coverage critical (may need flap reconstruction)
  • Plan biopsy tract excision en bloc with specimen

Outcomes:

  • 5-year local recurrence-free survival: 60-80% with wide margins
  • 5-year local recurrence-free survival: 20-40% with intralesional margins
  • Overall survival: 60-80% at 5 years, 40-60% at 10 years

There is good evidence that margin status predicts outcomes, with adequate surgical resection being the cornerstone of treatment.

Skull Base Chordoma Surgery

Managed primarily by neurosurgical teams. Challenging location adjacent to critical neurovascular structures.

Surgical approaches (depend on tumor location and extension):

  • Transnasal endoscopic (for midline clival tumors)
  • Extended transoral (lower clivus)
  • Lateral skull base approaches (for lateral extension)
  • Combined approaches for large tumors

Goals: Maximal safe resection. Complete resection often not possible due to critical structure involvement.

Adjuvant treatment: High-dose radiation (proton beam or carbon ion) typically used postoperatively given difficulty achieving wide margins.

Outcomes:

  • 5-year progression-free survival: 50-70% with surgery plus radiation
  • 10-year overall survival: 40-60%

These outcomes emphasize the importance of multimodal treatment for skull base chordoma.

Mobile Spine Chordoma Surgery

En bloc spondylectomy: Goal is complete vertebral body removal with tumor en bloc within margin of normal tissue.

Technique: Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) pioneered by Tomita and Boriani. Involves:

  • Posterior approach with exposure of levels above and below
  • Temporary stabilization
  • Circumferential dissection separating tumor from surrounding structures
  • Vertebral body osteotomies
  • En bloc specimen removal
  • Reconstruction with expandable cage or structural graft
  • Definitive instrumented fusion

Challenges:

  • Maintaining spinal cord perfusion
  • Achieving negative margins
  • Structural reconstruction
  • High complication rates

Outcomes:

  • En bloc resection: Better local control than intralesional
  • 5-year local recurrence: 10-30% with wide margins
  • 5-year local recurrence: 50-70% with intralesional margins

Mobile spine chordoma surgery demonstrates the technical complexity and need for specialized expertise in achieving adequate margins while preserving neurologic function.

Radiation Therapy

Conventional Photon Radiation

Chordomas are relatively radioresistant to conventional photon radiation. Doses required for control (greater than 70 Gy) exceed tolerance of surrounding normal tissues (brainstem, spinal cord, bowel, bladder). Therefore, conventional radiation has limited efficacy as primary treatment but may be used in palliative settings.

Proton Beam Therapy

Mechanism: Protons deposit maximum energy at a specific depth (Bragg peak) with minimal exit dose. This allows delivery of high radiation doses to tumor while sparing adjacent normal tissues.

Indications:

  • Unresectable chordomas (skull base, sacral with major vascular involvement)
  • Positive margins after surgery (adjuvant)
  • Recurrent tumors not amenable to further surgery
  • Patient choice when surgery declined

Dosing: Typical doses 70-80 Gy (RBE) in 35-40 fractions.

Outcomes:

  • 5-year local control: 60-80% for skull base chordomas
  • 5-year local control: 50-70% for sacral chordomas
  • Best results when combined with maximal safe surgery

Availability: Limited to specialized centers with proton beam facilities.

Carbon Ion Therapy

Similar concept to proton therapy but with theoretical radiobiologic advantages. Available at even fewer centers worldwide. Emerging evidence suggests similar or slightly better local control compared to proton therapy.

Conventional Radiation Role

Palliative treatment: Pain control, symptom management in metastatic disease or patients not candidates for surgery/proton therapy.

Adjuvant after intralesional surgery: May reduce recurrence risk but inferior to proton therapy.

Systemic Therapy

Chemotherapy

Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy has no established role in chordoma management. Chordomas are not chemosensitive. Multiple agents tested in clinical trials (ifosfamide, doxorubicin, cisplatin, temozolomide) with minimal response rates.

Targeted Therapies

Based on molecular profiling showing activation of receptor tyrosine kinase pathways, several targeted agents have been investigated:

Imatinib: PDGFR inhibitor. Small series showed disease stabilization in some patients but no objective responses. May have role in metastatic/unresectable disease.

EGFR inhibitors (erlotinib, cetuximab): Occasional responses reported in case reports. No large trials.

mTOR inhibitors: Under investigation based on pathway activation in some chordomas.

Immunotherapy: Checkpoint inhibitors being explored. Response rates appear low given low mutational burden of chordomas. Brachyury-targeted vaccine in clinical trials.

Current Approach to Systemic Therapy

No standard systemic therapy exists. For patients with metastatic or unresectable progressive disease, consider:

  • Clinical trial enrollment (preferred)
  • Targeted therapy (imatinib or EGFR inhibitor) with understanding of limited evidence
  • Palliative care focus

Complications

Surgical Complications

Intraoperative:

  • Hemorrhage: Sacral resections can involve significant blood loss (presacral venous plexus, iliac vessels). Blood transfusion commonly required.
  • Dural tear: High risk in spine cases. CSF leak risk.
  • Vascular injury: Iliac vessels at risk in sacral surgery. Requires vascular surgery availability.
  • Nerve injury: Intentional sacrifice versus inadvertent injury to roots intended to preserve.

Early postoperative:

  • Wound complications: Infection, dehiscence, seroma. High rate (20-40%) given large dead space and possible contamination.
  • Deep infection: Potential for infection of hardware/reconstruction. May require removal and prolonged antibiotics.
  • Neurologic deficits: Lower extremity weakness, bladder/bowel dysfunction if nerve roots sacrificed or injured.
  • Venous thromboembolism: High risk due to pelvic surgery and immobility.

Late complications:

  • Chronic pain: Neuropathic pain common, especially with nerve root sacrifice.
  • Bladder dysfunction: Requires intermittent catheterization or indwelling catheter if bilateral S2 sacrifice.
  • Bowel dysfunction: Constipation most common. May require bowel regimen or colostomy if severe.
  • Sexual dysfunction: Erectile dysfunction in men, dyspareunia in women.
  • Implant failure: Spinopelvic fixation failure can occur (5-10% of cases).
  • Sacral insufficiency: Stress fractures of remaining sacrum.

Radiation Complications

Acute: Skin erythema, mucositis (skull base), diarrhea (sacral).

Late:

  • Radiation necrosis: Brain/brainstem necrosis (skull base tumors), bowel injury (sacral tumors)
  • Secondary malignancy: Long-term risk of radiation-induced sarcoma
  • Endocrine dysfunction: Hypopituitarism after skull base radiation
  • Neurologic deficits: Cranial neuropathies, myelopathy risk

Proton/carbon ion therapy reduces risk of late complications compared to conventional radiation due to normal tissue sparing.

Disease-Related Complications

Local progression: Pain, neurologic deterioration, mass effect on pelvic organs.

Metastatic disease: Occurs in 10-40% of patients, usually late in disease course. Lungs most common site, followed by bone and liver. Median time to metastasis is 5-7 years after diagnosis.

Prognosis and Follow-Up

Prognostic Factors

Margin status: Single most important factor. Wide negative margins associated with significantly better local control and survival.

  • Wide margins: 5-year local recurrence 10-30%
  • Marginal/intralesional: 5-year local recurrence 50-90%

Tumor location:

  • Sacral: Generally better prognosis (more amenable to wide resection)
  • Skull base: More challenging to achieve margins, often require adjuvant radiation
  • Mobile spine: Intermediate prognosis

Histologic subtype:

  • Conventional: Standard prognosis
  • Chondroid: Similar to conventional when adequately treated
  • Dedifferentiated: Worst prognosis (median survival approximately 1 year)

Tumor size: Larger tumors associated with worse outcomes (harder to achieve margins, more likely to involve critical structures).

Age: Younger age generally associated with better survival.

Recurrence status: Recurrent tumors have worse prognosis than primary tumors.

Survival Data

5-year overall survival: 65-80% 10-year overall survival: 40-60% 5-year progression-free survival: 50-70% with optimal treatment

Cause of death: Most patients who die of chordoma do so from local progression rather than distant metastases. Uncontrolled local disease in sacrum or skull base causes significant morbidity.

Surveillance Protocol

Imaging schedule:

  • Years 1-2: MRI of primary site every 3-4 months
  • Years 3-5: MRI every 6 months
  • After 5 years: Annual MRI
  • Chest CT: Annually to monitor for pulmonary metastases
  • Whole body imaging: Consider if symptoms suggest new disease sites

Clinical follow-up: Assess for symptoms of local recurrence, neurologic function, pain control, functional status (bowel/bladder).

Long-term surveillance: Lifelong follow-up recommended as late recurrences occur (can recur 10-20 years after initial treatment).

Evidence Base

Systematic Review
📚 Stacchiotti and Sommer
Key Findings:
  • Comprehensive review of chordoma biology and treatment
  • En bloc resection with wide margins recommended as gold standard
  • Proton beam therapy for unresectable or adjuvant settings
  • Multidisciplinary approach essential for optimal outcomes
  • Limited role for conventional chemotherapy
Clinical Implication: Foundation for modern chordoma management strategy emphasizing surgery and radiation.
Source: Lancet Oncol 2015

Level III Diagnostic
📚 Vujovic et al (Brachyury Discovery)
Key Findings:
  • Brachyury identified as highly specific diagnostic marker for chordoma
  • Nuclear T-box transcription factor essential for notochord development
  • Positive in 95% of chordomas, negative in chondrosarcoma
  • Pathognomonic immunohistochemical stain
Clinical Implication: Brachyury is the key diagnostic marker that definitively distinguishes chordoma from mimics.
Source: J Pathol 2006

Level IV Therapeutic
📚 Fourney et al - Sacral Chordoma Outcomes
Key Findings:
  • Surgical outcomes for 52 sacral chordoma patients
  • Wide resection margins improve local control and survival
  • Intralesional surgery associated with 64% recurrence versus 27% with wide margins
  • Preservation of S1-S2 roots critical for function
Clinical Implication: Surgical margins are the most important prognostic factor - supports en bloc resection.
Source: Spine 2005

Level III Therapeutic
📚 DeLaney et al - Proton Therapy
Key Findings:
  • Long-term outcomes of proton therapy for skull base chordomas
  • 5-year local control rate 73%, overall survival 81%
  • High-dose radiation (median 77 Gy RBE) safely delivered
  • Best outcomes with maximal safe surgery followed by proton therapy
Clinical Implication: Proton beam therapy provides excellent local control for unresectable or incompletely resected chordomas.
Source: J Neurosurg 2014

Level III Prognostic
📚 Bergh et al - Swedish Chordoma Registry
Key Findings:
  • Population-based study of 39 sacral chordomas over 40 years
  • 10-year overall survival 50%
  • Local recurrence in 60% of patients
  • Wide resection associated with better survival
Clinical Implication: Long-term population data confirms high local recurrence rates and importance of adequate surgery.
Source: Cancer 2000

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOAdvanced

Scenario 1: Sacral Chordoma Diagnosis and Management

EXAMINER

"A 55-year-old man presents with 12 months of progressive sacral pain and recent onset constipation. MRI shows a large midline sacral mass destroying S3-S5 with extensive anterior soft tissue extension. Biopsy shows physaliferous cells and is brachyury positive. How do you manage him?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a sacral chordoma based on the clinical presentation, imaging appearance, and histology demonstrating physaliferous cells with positive brachyury staining. Chordoma is a rare malignant bone tumor arising from notochordal remnants, which explains its exclusive location in the axial skeleton. Sacral chordoma represents approximately 50% of all chordomas. My approach would be multidisciplinary. First, I would complete staging with chest CT to exclude pulmonary metastases, which can occur in 10-40% of patients during their disease course. For local staging, MRI is the gold standard showing the characteristic T2 hyperintense appearance from the myxoid matrix. I would review the imaging carefully to assess the relationship of the tumor to the S2-S3 junction, which is critical for functional outcomes. The tumor extends from S3 to S5, which means S1 and S2 nerve roots may be preservable. The key treatment principle is that en bloc wide resection with negative margins is the only chance for cure. Intralesional surgery leads to 50-90% local recurrence. For this patient, I would plan a combined anterior-posterior approach given the large anterior soft tissue extension. The anterior phase would mobilize the rectum and ligate vessels to the tumor. The posterior phase would complete the sacrectomy en bloc. Because the tumor involves S3-S5, bilateral S3 nerve roots would need to be sacrificed, which will cause some bladder and bowel dysfunction, though less severe than S2 sacrifice. I would counsel the patient extensively about functional outcomes including bowel, bladder, and sexual function. Reconstruction would include soft tissue coverage and potentially myocutaneous flap. If clear margins cannot be achieved surgically, adjuvant proton beam radiotherapy should be considered as chordoma is relatively resistant to conventional photon radiation. Prognosis is guarded with 10-year survival approximately 40-60%, but margin status is the single most important prognostic factor for local control and survival.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Chordoma arises from notochord remnants - explains sacral midline location
Brachyury is pathognomonic immunohistochemical marker
En bloc wide resection essential - intralesional surgery has 50-90% recurrence
S2 nerve root preservation critical for bladder/bowel function
Proton beam therapy for unresectable or positive margins
Multidisciplinary approach with oncology and specialized surgeons
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not knowing brachyury as the diagnostic marker for chordoma
✗Not recognizing the critical importance of wide surgical margins
✗Not discussing functional outcomes and nerve root preservation
✗Not mentioning proton beam therapy as adjuvant or for unresectable disease
✗Suggesting conventional chemotherapy (no proven role)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are physaliferous cells? (Large cells with vacuolated, bubbly cytoplasm containing mucin/glycogen - pathognomonic for chordoma)"
"Why is conventional radiation less effective? (Chordoma is radioresistant; doses needed for control exceed normal tissue tolerance. Proton beam allows high dose delivery with tissue sparing)"
"What immunostains confirm chordoma diagnosis? (Brachyury positive - pathognomonic. Also S100, cytokeratin positive. Distinguishes from chondrosarcoma which is brachyury negative)"
"What are the functional consequences of bilateral S2 root sacrifice? (Permanent bladder dysfunction requiring catheterization, bowel dysfunction often requiring colostomy, sexual dysfunction)"
VIVA SCENARIOAdvanced

Scenario 2: Chordoma Recurrence Management

EXAMINER

"A 48-year-old woman had sacral chordoma treated 3 years ago with intralesional surgery and conventional radiation. She now presents with recurrent pain. MRI shows tumor recurrence involving S2-S4. What is your approach?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has local recurrence of sacral chordoma, which unfortunately occurs in 50-90% of cases after intralesional surgery. Recurrent chordoma presents a challenging situation with worse prognosis than primary disease. My approach would start with restaging to assess extent of recurrent disease and exclude distant metastases with chest CT and consideration of PET-CT, which can help distinguish recurrence from post-treatment changes. For the local recurrence, I would obtain updated MRI to assess the exact extent and relationship to critical structures, particularly the S2 nerve roots. I would review the previous operative report and radiation records to understand what was done and cumulative radiation dose received. Management options depend on resectability and patient factors. If the recurrent tumor is resectable with en bloc technique and acceptable functional outcomes, I would discuss re-operation with the goal of wide margins this time. However, this is more challenging than primary surgery due to scarring and previous radiation changes. The recurrence now involves S2, so bilateral S2 sacrifice would cause permanent bladder and bowel dysfunction requiring catheterization and likely colostomy - this must be discussed extensively with the patient. Given she has already had conventional radiation, options for additional radiation are limited by prior dose. If she received less than 50 Gy previously, proton beam therapy could be considered for the recurrence if available, as it allows high-dose delivery with better normal tissue sparing. If the tumor is unresectable or the patient declines surgery given the morbidity, proton beam therapy would be the primary treatment modality if feasible. The prognosis for recurrent chordoma is worse than primary disease with 5-year survival typically less than 50%. I would ensure multidisciplinary input including medical oncology, though conventional chemotherapy has no proven role. Clinical trial enrollment should be discussed if available. Palliative care involvement would be appropriate given the challenging prognosis and potential for significant symptoms.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recurrent chordoma has worse prognosis than primary disease
Intralesional surgery has 50-90% recurrence risk
Re-operation is challenging but may be considered if resectable with margins
Prior radiation limits options - proton beam may allow additional dose
Functional consequences of S2 sacrifice are severe
No role for conventional chemotherapy; clinical trials preferred
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not recognizing that intralesional surgery predisposes to recurrence
✗Offering surgery without discussing severe functional impact of S2 sacrifice
✗Not accounting for prior radiation dose limits
✗Suggesting conventional chemotherapy as treatment option
✗Not involving palliative care for challenging prognosis
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the recurrence rate after intralesional versus wide resection? (Intralesional: 50-90%, Wide margins: 10-30% at 5 years)"
"Can additional conventional radiation be given? (Limited by prior dose and normal tissue tolerance - proton beam allows higher cumulative dose)"
"What is the role of chemotherapy? (No established role - chordoma is not chemosensitive to conventional agents)"
"What targeted therapies are being investigated? (Imatinib for PDGFR inhibition, EGFR inhibitors, immunotherapy with brachyury vaccine)"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 3: Differential Diagnosis and Pathology

EXAMINER

"A 60-year-old presents with a destructive midline sacral lesion on MRI that is very bright on T2 sequences. The differential diagnosis includes chordoma versus chondrosarcoma. How do you differentiate these pathologically?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is an important differential diagnosis as both chordoma and chondrosarcoma can occur in the sacrum and have overlapping imaging features, particularly the T2 hyperintensity from cartilaginous or myxoid matrix. The distinction is critical because treatment approaches and prognosis differ. Both tumors can be S100 positive, so this immunostain is not discriminatory. The key distinguishing feature is immunohistochemical staining for brachyury. Brachyury is a nuclear T-box transcription factor that is pathognomonic for chordoma. It is positive in over 95% of chordomas and is negative in chondrosarcoma. This makes it the single most important immunostain to confirm the diagnosis. In addition to brachyury, chordoma typically shows positive cytokeratin staining, particularly low molecular weight keratins with a characteristic paranuclear dot pattern, whereas chondrosarcoma is cytokeratin negative. On histology, chordoma demonstrates characteristic physaliferous cells, which are large cells with abundant vacuolated, bubbly cytoplasm containing glycogen and mucin. These cells are pathognomonic for chordoma when present. The tumor grows in lobules within a myxoid matrix. Chondrosarcoma, in contrast, shows malignant chondrocytes within cartilaginous matrix with varying degrees of atypia and cellularity depending on grade. The chondroid variant of chordoma can be particularly challenging as it contains both chordomatous areas with physaliferous cells and areas with hyaline cartilage formation. In these cases, brachyury staining is essential to make the diagnosis. Chondroid chordoma is brachyury positive, distinguishing it from chondrosarcoma. Historically, chondroid chordoma was thought to have better prognosis, but recent studies suggest outcomes are similar to conventional chordoma when adequately treated. The distinction matters because chordoma requires wide en bloc resection for cure, whereas some chondrosarcomas may be amenable to curettage and adjuvant treatment depending on grade and location.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Brachyury is pathognomonic for chordoma (positive in 95%, negative in chondrosarcoma)
Physaliferous cells are characteristic histologic feature of chordoma
Both can be S100 positive, so this does not distinguish them
Cytokeratin positive in chordoma, negative in chondrosarcoma
Chondroid chordoma variant contains cartilage but is brachyury positive
COMMON TRAPS
✗Relying on S100 staining alone (both are positive)
✗Not knowing brachyury as the key distinguishing marker
✗Not describing physaliferous cells when asked about histology
✗Not recognizing the chondroid variant of chordoma
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is brachyury? (A nuclear T-box transcription factor essential for notochord development - pathognomonic for chordoma)"
"Describe physaliferous cells. (Large cells with abundant vacuolated, bubbly cytoplasm containing mucin and glycogen, often with eccentric nuclei)"
"What other tumors can occur in the sacrum? (Metastases, multiple myeloma, giant cell tumor, osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, myxopapillary ependymoma)"
"Why is the distinction clinically important? (Treatment differs - chordoma requires wide en bloc resection; prognosis and behavior differ)"

MCQ Practice Points

Embryologic Origin

Q: What is the embryologic origin of chordoma?

A: Notochordal remnants. The notochord is an embryonic structure that forms the primitive axial skeleton and normally regresses completely by 8 weeks of gestation, leaving only the nucleus pulposus. Chordoma arises from ectopic notochordal cell rests that persist after embryogenesis. This explains the exclusive location of chordoma in midline axial skeleton structures.

Diagnostic Marker

Q: What is the pathognomonic immunohistochemical marker for chordoma?

A: Brachyury - a nuclear T-box transcription factor encoded by the TBXT gene. Brachyury is positive in over 95% of chordomas and is the single most specific marker. It is negative in chondrosarcoma and other differential diagnoses. Also positive: S100 (80-100%), cytokeratin (80-100%). The combination of brachyury, S100, and cytokeratin positivity confirms chordoma.

Characteristic Histology

Q: What is the characteristic cell type in chordoma histology?

A: Physaliferous cells - large cells with abundant vacuolated, bubbly cytoplasm containing glycogen and mucin. The cytoplasmic vacuoles push the nucleus to the periphery, sometimes creating a signet-ring appearance. These cells are pathognomonic for chordoma when present. The tumor grows in lobules within abundant myxoid matrix.

Treatment Priority

Q: What is the most important prognostic factor for chordoma?

A: Surgical margin status. Wide negative margins are associated with significantly better local control and overall survival. Intralesional surgery (tumor violation) results in 50-90% local recurrence at 5 years, compared to 10-30% recurrence with wide en bloc resection. En bloc resection with negative margins is the only curative treatment.

Radiation Therapy

Q: Why is proton beam therapy preferred over conventional photon radiation for chordoma?

A: Chordomas are relatively radioresistant and require high radiation doses (greater than 70 Gy) for local control. These doses exceed the tolerance of surrounding normal tissues (brainstem, spinal cord, bowel) with conventional photon radiation. Proton beam therapy allows delivery of high doses to the tumor with minimal exit dose due to the Bragg peak phenomenon, thereby sparing adjacent critical structures. This achieves better tumor control with fewer complications than conventional radiation.

Australian Context

Chordoma is extremely rare in Australia with an estimated 20-30 new cases annually. Management is centralized at specialized sarcoma referral centers including Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (Melbourne), Chris O'Brien Lifehouse (Sydney), and Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital. All cases require multidisciplinary tumor board discussion including orthopedic oncology, neurosurgery, medical oncology, radiation oncology, radiology, and pathology.

Proton beam therapy is not currently available in Australia, requiring overseas referral to centers in the USA, Japan, or Europe when indicated. This represents a significant barrier to optimal care and requires state health department approval or private funding on a case-by-case basis. Targeted therapies for chordoma may require PBS special access scheme applications.

Patient support is available through Chordoma Foundation Australia and Sarcoma Australia, which provide education, advocacy, and connection to support services for patients and families dealing with this challenging diagnosis.

CHORDOMA - EXAM ESSENTIALS

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Facts (Must Know)

  • •**Notochord remnant** origin (embryonic structure, normally regresses)
  • •Location: **Sacrum 50%**, Skull base 35%, Mobile spine 15%
  • •Incidence: 1-4% of bone tumors, 0.08 per 100,000 population
  • •Peak age: 50-70 years, male-to-female ratio 2:1
  • •Slow-growing but **locally aggressive** malignancy

Histology (PBS Mnemonic)

  • •**P**hysaliferous cells - bubbly vacuolated cytoplasm (pathognomonic)
  • •**B**rachyury positive - nuclear T-box transcription factor (diagnostic)
  • •**S**100 and cytokeratin positive - also EMA positive
  • •Lobulated architecture in abundant myxoid matrix
  • •Brachyury distinguishes from chondrosarcoma (negative in CS)

Imaging Features

  • •MRI: T1 hypointense, **T2 very hyperintense** (myxoid matrix)
  • •CT: Midline lytic destruction with soft tissue mass
  • •Calcification in 30-70% (flocculent pattern)
  • •Heterogeneous enhancement post-contrast
  • •Chest CT mandatory for staging (lungs common metastatic site)

Treatment (WIDE Mnemonic)

  • •**W**ide margins - en bloc resection only cure
  • •**I**ntralesional = recurrence (50-90% recurrence rate)
  • •**D**ifficult locations - sacrum/skull base complex surgery
  • •**E**xcellent radiation - proton beam for unresectable/positive margins
  • •No role for conventional chemotherapy (not chemosensitive)

Sacral Surgery Pearls

  • •**S1 roots**: Bilateral preservation essential for walking
  • •**S2 roots**: Bilateral preservation for bladder/bowel function
  • •S3 sacrifice: Some dysfunction but better tolerated than S2
  • •Combined anterior-posterior approach for large tumors
  • •Margin status most important prognostic factor

Prognosis

  • •5-year survival: 65-80%, 10-year survival: 40-60%
  • •Wide margins: 10-30% recurrence at 5 years
  • •Intralesional: 50-90% recurrence at 5 years
  • •Metastases occur in 10-40% (lungs, bone, liver)
  • •Dedifferentiated variant: Median survival 1 year

Differential Diagnosis

  • •**Chondrosarcoma** - brachyury negative, cytokeratin negative
  • •Metastatic adenocarcinoma - clinical history, brachyury negative
  • •Myxopapillary ependymoma - GFAP positive, no physaliferous cells
  • •Ecchordosis physaliphora - benign notochord remnant, small, no destruction

High-Yield Exam Points

  • •Brachyury is THE diagnostic marker (know this)
  • •En bloc wide resection is only cure (emphasize margins)
  • •Proton beam preferred over conventional radiation (radioresistance)
  • •S2 root preservation critical for bladder/bowel function
  • •No role for chemotherapy (but mention targeted trials)
Quick Stats
Reading Time114 min
Related Topics

Bone Island (Enostosis)

Expandable Prostheses in Pediatric Oncology

Fibrosarcoma of Bone

Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath (GCTTS)