Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Congenital Pseudarthrosis of Tibia

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Congenital Pseudarthrosis of Tibia

Comprehensive guide to congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia (CPT) - Crawford classification, neurofibromatosis association, treatment from bracing to vascularized fibula transfer, and outcomes

complete
Updated: 2025-12-19
High Yield Overview

CONGENITAL PSEUDARTHROSIS OF TIBIA

NF1 Association | Crawford Classification | Vascularized Fibula Gold Standard | High Failure Rate

50-90%Associated with NF1
Crawford I-IVClassification
Vascularized fibulaGold standard treatment
50-70%Union rate

CRAWFORD CLASSIFICATION

Type I
PatternAnterior bowing, medullary canal intact
TreatmentBracing, prophylactic rod
Type II
PatternAnterior bowing, medullary canal narrowed
TreatmentBracing, consider prophylactic rod
Type III
PatternCystic lesion, fracture imminent
TreatmentProphylactic rod, bone graft
Type IV
PatternEstablished pseudarthrosis
TreatmentVascularized fibula, IM rod, Ilizarov

Critical Must-Knows

  • 50-90% associated with NF1 - always assess for café-au-lait spots, neurofibromas, family history
  • Crawford classification guides treatment: Type I/II = bracing/prophylaxis, Type III/IV = surgical reconstruction
  • Vascularized fibula transfer is gold standard for established pseudarthrosis (Type IV)
  • Pre-fracture bracing (PTB orthosis) may delay fracture but does not prevent it
  • High failure rate - multiple surgeries often needed, amputation may be required after multiple failures

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Crawford classification is high-yield - know all 4 types and treatment implications
  • "
    Vascularized fibula transfer is gold standard - preserves blood supply, better union rates
  • "
    Williams telescoping rod allows growth while maintaining stability
  • "
    Always assess for NF1 - café-au-lait spots, Lisch nodules, family history

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Radiograph series showing Ilizarov treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia
Click to expand
'4-in-1 osteosynthesis' for atrophic-type congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT). (A) Preoperative radiograph at age 6 years showing the pseudarthrosis. (B) Ilizarov external fixator in place during treatment. (C) Post-treatment radiograph showing healed tibia with improved alignment.Credit: Choi IH et al. via Clin Orthop Surg (CC BY)
Clinical photograph of child with external fixator for CPT treatment
Click to expand
Pediatric patient undergoing distraction osteogenesis with external fixator for congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. (a) Anteroposterior view showing the monolateral fixator extending from knee to ankle. (b) Lateral view demonstrating the frame configuration.Credit: Zhu GH et al. via BMC Musculoskelet Disord (CC BY)

Critical CPT Exam Points

NF1 Association is Critical

50-90% of CPT associated with NF1 - always assess for café-au-lait spots (over 6 spots over 1.5cm), neurofibromas, Lisch nodules, family history. NF1 diagnosis affects prognosis and treatment approach.

Crawford Classification Guides Treatment

Type I/II (pre-fracture): Bracing, prophylactic rod. Type III (cystic): Prophylactic rod + bone graft. Type IV (established): Vascularized fibula transfer (gold standard), IM rod, Ilizarov. Classification determines urgency and approach.

Vascularized Fibula is Gold Standard

Vascularized fibula transfer preserves blood supply, achieves 50-70% union rate (best of all options). Requires microsurgery expertise. Combined with IM rod for stability. BMP may augment healing.

High Failure Rate Expected

Multiple surgeries often needed - union rate 50-70% even with best treatment. Amputation may be required after 3-4 failed reconstructions. Realistic expectations essential for families.

CPT Treatment by Crawford Type - Quick Reference

Crawford TypeDescriptionTreatmentUnion Rate
Type IAnterior bowing, intact canalPTB brace, prophylactic rodPrevention
Type IIAnterior bowing, narrowed canalPTB brace, prophylactic rodPrevention
Type IIICystic lesion, fracture imminentProphylactic rod + bone graft60-70%
Type IVEstablished pseudarthrosisVascularized fibula + IM rod50-70%
Mnemonic

VIBECPT Treatment Options

V
Vascularized fibula
Gold standard for Type IV - preserves blood supply
I
IM rod
Williams telescoping rod allows growth, maintains stability
B
Bracing
PTB orthosis for pre-fracture (Type I/II) - delays but doesn't prevent
E
Excision
Remove hamartomatous tissue and pseudarthrosis site

Memory Hook:VIBE with treatment: Vascularized fibula (gold standard), IM rod (stability), Bracing (prevention), and Excision (remove pathology)!

Mnemonic

CALMNF1 Diagnostic Criteria

C
Café-au-lait spots
Over 6 spots over 1.5cm (diagnostic)
A
Axillary/inguinal freckling
Crowe's sign - pathognomonic
L
Lisch nodules
Iris hamartomas (over 2 diagnostic)
M
Multiple neurofibromas
Or one plexiform neurofibroma

Memory Hook:CALM diagnosis: Café-au-lait spots, Axillary freckling, Lisch nodules, and Multiple neurofibromas confirm NF1!

Mnemonic

REBUILDCPT Surgical Principles

R
Remove pathology
Excise hamartomatous tissue and pseudarthrosis
E
Establish stability
IM rod (Williams telescoping) for mechanical support
B
Bone graft
Vascularized fibula (best) or autograft iliac crest
U
Union goal
50-70% success rate - realistic expectations
I
Ilizarov option
Bone transport for large defects
L
Long-term bracing
PTB orthosis post-union to prevent refracture
D
Don't give up
Multiple attempts may be needed, amputation last resort

Memory Hook:REBUILD the tibia: Remove pathology, Establish stability, Bone graft, Union goal, Ilizarov option, Long-term bracing, and Don't give up!

Overview and Epidemiology

Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT) is a rare condition characterized by failure of the tibia to heal after fracture, resulting in a persistent nonunion. It is strongly associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and represents one of the most challenging conditions in pediatric orthopedics.

Epidemiology:

  • Incidence: 1 in 140,000 to 250,000 live births
  • Male to female ratio: 1.5:1
  • Bilateral involvement: 10-15% of cases
  • Left side slightly more common
  • Strong association with NF1 (50-90% of cases)

Pathophysiology: CPT results from abnormal bone formation and healing. The exact mechanism is unknown but involves:

  • Hamartomatous tissue at pseudarthrosis site (fibrous, non-ossifying)
  • Abnormal periosteum (thickened, constrictive)
  • Poor vascularity at pseudarthrosis site
  • Abnormal bone biology (osteoclasts, osteoblasts dysfunction)
  • NF1 gene mutation (when associated)

The condition represents a spectrum from anterior bowing (pre-fracture) to established nonunion (pseudarthrosis).

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Normal Tibial Anatomy: The tibia is the primary weight-bearing bone of the lower leg. It has a triangular cross-section with anterior, medial, and lateral surfaces. The medullary canal contains bone marrow and provides a pathway for intramedullary fixation.

CPT Pathology: In CPT, there is:

  • Anterior bowing: Characteristic deformity (anterolateral)
  • Hamartomatous tissue: Fibrous, non-ossifying tissue at pseudarthrosis site
  • Abnormal periosteum: Thickened, constrictive, prevents healing
  • Narrowed medullary canal: In Type II, canal becomes sclerotic and narrowed
  • Cystic lesions: In Type III, cystic changes precede fracture
  • Established nonunion: In Type IV, complete pseudarthrosis with no healing potential

Pathophysiology: The hamartomatous tissue at the pseudarthrosis site prevents normal bone healing. The tissue is:

  • Fibrous and avascular
  • Contains abnormal cells (not true bone-forming cells)
  • Creates a barrier to healing
  • May be related to NF1 gene mutation (when associated)

NF1 Association: When CPT is associated with NF1:

  • NF1 gene mutation affects bone biology
  • Abnormal periosteal function
  • Poor vascularity
  • Worse prognosis than isolated CPT

Understanding the pathology helps guide treatment - excision of hamartomatous tissue is essential.

Classification Systems

Crawford Classification (1986)

The most widely used classification, based on radiographic appearance:

Crawford Classification Summary

TypeRadiographic AppearanceMedullary CanalTreatment
Type IAnterior bowingIntactPTB brace, prophylactic rod
Type IIAnterior bowingNarrowed/scleroticPTB brace, prophylactic rod
Type IIICystic lesionCystic changesProphylactic rod + bone graft
Type IVEstablished pseudarthrosisNonunionVascularized fibula + IM rod

Type I: Anterior bowing present, medullary canal intact. No fracture yet. Treatment: Total contact PTB brace, consider prophylactic IM rod if progressive deformity.

Type II: Anterior bowing with narrowed or sclerotic medullary canal. Fracture risk higher. Treatment: PTB brace, prophylactic IM rod often indicated.

Type III: Cystic lesion in tibia, fracture imminent. Medullary canal shows cystic changes. Treatment: Prophylactic IM rod with bone grafting to prevent fracture.

Type IV: Established pseudarthrosis - complete nonunion. No healing potential without surgery. Treatment: Vascularized fibula transfer (gold standard) combined with IM rod.

The classification guides treatment urgency and approach.

Boyd Classification (Historical)

Less commonly used now, but still referenced:

  • Type I: Anterior bowing and defect at birth
  • Type II: Hourglass constriction (most common)
  • Type III: Cystic lesion
  • Type IV: Sclerotic segment with medullary canal obliteration
  • Type V: Dislocation of distal fragment
  • Type VI: Intraosseous neurofibroma

Crawford classification is preferred for treatment planning.

Clinical Assessment

History:

  • Anterior bowing noted at birth or early infancy
  • May have history of minor trauma leading to fracture
  • Family history of NF1 (if associated)
  • Difficulty with weight-bearing or walking
  • Previous treatment attempts (if established pseudarthrosis)

Physical Examination:

Inspection:

  • Anterior (anterolateral) bowing of tibia
  • May have visible pseudarthrosis site (if Type IV)
  • Limb length discrepancy (if established)
  • Ankle deformity (valgus, equinus)
  • Assess for NF1 features:
    • Café-au-lait spots (over 6 spots over 1.5cm)
    • Axillary/inguinal freckling (Crowe's sign)
    • Neurofibromas
    • Lisch nodules (iris examination)

Palpation:

  • Pseudarthrosis site may be palpable (Type IV)
  • Anterior bowing may be felt
  • Assess for mobility at pseudarthrosis (if present)

Range of Motion:

  • Ankle: May have limited dorsiflexion (equinus)
  • Knee: Usually normal
  • Assess for contractures

Neurovascular:

  • Usually normal
  • Assess for NF1-related neuropathies (rare)

Associated Findings:

  • Fibular involvement (common - may also have pseudarthrosis)
  • Ankle deformity (valgus, equinus)
  • Limb length discrepancy

Investigations

Radiographs:

AP and Lateral Tibia:

  • Assess anterior bowing (characteristic)
  • Evaluate medullary canal (intact, narrowed, cystic, or nonunion)
  • Measure bowing angle
  • Assess for pseudarthrosis (Type IV)
  • Evaluate fibula (may also be affected)

Full-Length Lower Limb:

  • Measure limb length discrepancy
  • Assess alignment
  • Evaluate ankle deformity

CT Scan:

  • May help assess medullary canal status
  • Evaluate cystic lesions (Type III)
  • Plan surgical approach

MRI:

  • Assess soft tissue (hamartomatous tissue)
  • Evaluate vascularity
  • Plan vascularized fibula transfer

NF1 Workup (if suspected):

  • Genetic testing (NF1 gene mutation)
  • Ophthalmology examination (Lisch nodules)
  • Family history assessment
  • Dermatology assessment (café-au-lait spots, neurofibromas)

Bone Scan:

  • May assess vascularity at pseudarthrosis site
  • Less commonly used now

Treatment Approach

Treatment Philosophy

Treatment goals:

  1. Prevent fracture (Type I/II)
  2. Achieve union (Type III/IV)
  3. Maintain limb length
  4. Preserve function

Treatment options:

  • Pre-fracture (Type I/II): PTB brace, prophylactic IM rod
  • Pre-fracture (Type III): Prophylactic rod + bone graft
  • Established (Type IV): Vascularized fibula transfer (gold standard), IM rod, Ilizarov

Key principles:

  • Early intervention (before fracture if possible)
  • Excision of hamartomatous tissue
  • Stable fixation (IM rod)
  • Vascularized bone graft (best healing)
  • Long-term bracing post-union

Success rate: 50-70% even with best treatment.

Type I/II: Pre-Fracture Management

Indications:

  • Anterior bowing without fracture
  • Intact (Type I) or narrowed (Type II) medullary canal

Treatment:

  1. PTB brace (total contact)
    • Full-time wear
    • Protects from fracture
    • Does not prevent eventual fracture
    • Activity modification
  2. Prophylactic IM rod
    • Consider if progressive deformity
    • Williams telescoping rod (allows growth)
    • May delay or prevent fracture
    • Controversial - some prefer to wait

Outcomes: Bracing delays fracture but does not prevent it. Prophylactic rod may prevent fracture in some cases.

Type III: Cystic Lesion Management

Indications:

  • Cystic lesion present
  • Fracture imminent

Treatment:

  1. Prophylactic IM rod
    • Williams telescoping rod
    • Provides stability
  2. Bone grafting
    • Autogenous iliac crest
    • Fill cystic lesion
    • May prevent fracture

Outcomes: 60-70% success in preventing fracture or achieving union if fracture occurs.

Type IV: Established Pseudarthrosis

Indications:

  • Complete nonunion
  • No healing potential without surgery

Treatment (Gold Standard):

  1. Excision of hamartomatous tissue
    • Remove all abnormal tissue
    • Debride pseudarthrosis site
  2. Vascularized fibula transfer
    • Microsurgical technique
    • Preserves blood supply
    • Best union rates (50-70%)
  3. IM rod (Williams telescoping)
    • Provides mechanical stability
    • Allows growth
    • Combined with vascularized fibula
  4. BMP augmentation
    • May enhance healing
    • Used as adjunct

Alternative options:

  • Ilizarov bone transport (for large defects)
  • Autogenous iliac crest graft (if vascularized fibula not available)
  • Amputation (after multiple failures)

Outcomes: 50-70% union rate with vascularized fibula transfer.

Surgical Techniques

Vascularized Fibula Transfer (Gold Standard)

Indication: Type IV established pseudarthrosis.

Technique:

  1. Excision:
    • Remove all hamartomatous tissue
    • Debride pseudarthrosis site
    • Remove abnormal periosteum
  2. Fibula harvest:
    • Contralateral fibula (usually)
    • Preserve peroneal vessels
    • Length: match defect size
  3. Microsurgical transfer:
    • Anastomose peroneal vessels to recipient vessels
    • Position fibula in tibial defect
    • Fixation with IM rod
  4. Stabilization:
    • Williams telescoping rod
    • Allows growth
    • Maintains stability

Postoperative: Cast 3-6 months, then protected weight-bearing. Long-term PTB brace.

Advantages: Preserves blood supply, best union rates (50-70%).

Williams Telescoping Intramedullary Rod

Indication: All types (prophylaxis or with bone graft).

Technique:

  1. Rod insertion:
    • Through calcaneus, talus, across ankle
    • Into tibial medullary canal
    • Telescoping design allows growth
  2. Positioning:
    • Extends from calcaneus to proximal tibia
    • Maintains alignment
    • Allows growth
  3. Stability:
    • Provides mechanical support
    • Prevents deformity
    • Allows weight-bearing

Advantages: Allows growth while maintaining stability. Can be used with bone graft.

Disadvantages: May need revision as child grows. Ankle stiffness possible.

Ilizarov External Fixation with Bone Transport

Indication: Large defects, failed previous attempts.

Technique:

  1. Osteotomy:
    • Proximal or distal to defect
    • Create transport segment
  2. Transport:
    • Move segment gradually (1mm/day)
    • Fill defect
  3. Consolidation:
    • Wait for union
    • Remove fixator

Advantages: Can address large defects. No donor site morbidity.

Disadvantages: Long treatment time. Pin site infections. Stiffness.

11-panel radiograph series showing CPT treatment progression
Click to expand
Comprehensive CPT treatment case (2-year-old boy). (a-b) Initial anterior bowing and pseudarthrosis. (c) Intramedullary rod placement. (d-g) Ilizarov external fixator with bone transport during treatment phases. (h-k) Progressive healing and final outcome showing united tibia with IM rod.Credit: Zhu GH et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015 (CC BY)
10-panel treatment case showing CPT with NF1 association
Click to expand
CPT with NF1 association (14-year-old boy). (a-d) Pre-operative radiographs showing pseudarthrosis and proximal tibial dysplasia. (e) Intraoperative circular fixator. (f) Clinical photo with external fixator in situ. (g-j) Treatment progression and final outcome with healed tibia.Credit: Zhu GH et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015 (CC BY)

Complications

Early Complications:

Surgical:

  • Infection (5-10%)
  • Wound healing problems
  • Neurovascular injury (microsurgery)
  • Graft failure (vascularized fibula)
  • Hardware problems

Late Complications:

Nonunion:

  • Persistent pseudarthrosis (30-50% failure rate)
  • May require multiple surgeries
  • Amputation after 3-4 failures

Deformity:

  • Recurrent anterior bowing
  • Ankle deformity (valgus, equinus)
  • Limb length discrepancy

Growth Disturbance:

  • Shortening of affected limb
  • May require lengthening procedures

Ankle Problems:

  • Stiffness (IM rod through ankle)
  • Deformity (valgus, equinus)
  • May require ankle fusion

Donor Site (Vascularized Fibula):

  • Fibular nonunion (rare)
  • Ankle instability (if too much fibula removed)
  • Peroneal nerve injury

Prevention:

  • Careful patient selection
  • Meticulous surgical technique
  • Adequate excision of hamartomatous tissue
  • Stable fixation
  • Long-term bracing
  • Realistic expectations

Postoperative Care

Immediate Postoperative:

  • Pain management
  • Neurovascular monitoring (especially microsurgery)
  • Wound care
  • Immobilization (cast, external fixator)

Casting Phase:

  • Long leg cast 3-6 months
  • Non-weight bearing initially
  • Serial radiographs to assess healing
  • Cast changes if needed

After Union:

  • Protected weight-bearing
  • Gradual return to activities
  • Long-term PTB brace (full-time initially, then part-time)
  • Activity modification (avoid high-impact sports)

Long-term Follow-up:

  • Annual assessment until skeletal maturity
  • Monitor for refracture
  • Assess limb length discrepancy
  • Evaluate ankle function
  • Address complications as they arise

Bracing:

  • PTB orthosis long-term
  • May need until skeletal maturity
  • Prevents refracture
  • Activity modification

Outcomes and Prognosis

Functional Outcomes:

Union Rates:

  • Vascularized fibula transfer: 50-70%
  • Autogenous iliac crest: 30-50%
  • Ilizarov: 40-60%
  • Overall: 50-70% with best treatment

Predictors of Success:

  • Early treatment (before multiple fractures)
  • Adequate excision of hamartomatous tissue
  • Vascularized bone graft
  • Stable fixation
  • NF1-negative (better than NF1-positive)

Predictors of Failure:

  • NF1 association (worse prognosis)
  • Multiple previous surgeries
  • Large defect
  • Poor vascularity
  • Inadequate excision

Quality of Life:

  • Most patients function well after union
  • May have activity limitations
  • Ankle problems common
  • Limb length discrepancy may require lengthening
  • Psychosocial support important

Long-term:

  • Refracture risk: 20-30% even after union
  • Long-term bracing often needed
  • Ankle problems may require fusion
  • Limb length discrepancy may worsen
  • Regular follow-up essential

Evidence Base

Crawford Classification and Treatment

4
Crawford AH, Schorry EK • J Pediatr Orthop (1999)
Key Findings:
  • Crawford classification guides treatment approach
  • Type I/II: bracing and prophylactic rod
  • Type III: prophylactic rod + bone graft
  • Type IV: vascularized fibula transfer (gold standard)
Clinical Implication: Crawford classification is essential for treatment planning - Type I/II can be managed with bracing and prophylaxis, while Type IV requires vascularized fibula transfer for best outcomes.

Vascularized Fibula Transfer for CPT

4
Weiland AJ, Daniel RK • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1979)
Key Findings:
  • Vascularized fibula transfer achieves 50-70% union rate
  • Superior to non-vascularized grafts
  • Preserves blood supply enhances healing
  • Combined with IM rod for stability
Clinical Implication: Vascularized fibula transfer is the gold standard treatment for established CPT (Type IV), achieving the best union rates (50-70%) when combined with IM rod stabilization.

NF1 Association with CPT

4
Stevenson DA, Viskochil DH • Am J Med Genet (1999)
Key Findings:
  • 50-90% of CPT associated with NF1
  • NF1-positive cases have worse prognosis
  • Lower union rates in NF1-positive
  • Requires comprehensive NF1 assessment
Clinical Implication: NF1 association is present in 50-90% of CPT cases and significantly affects prognosis - always assess for NF1 features and counsel families about worse outcomes in NF1-positive cases.

Williams Telescoping Rod in CPT

4
Johnston CE • J Pediatr Orthop (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Telescoping rod allows growth while maintaining stability
  • Can be used prophylactically or with bone graft
  • Ankle stiffness is common complication
  • May require revision as child grows
Clinical Implication: Williams telescoping rod provides mechanical stability while allowing growth, making it ideal for pediatric CPT treatment, though ankle stiffness is a common long-term complication.

Long-term Outcomes of CPT Treatment

4
Richards BS, Oetgen ME • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2010)
Key Findings:
  • Overall union rate 50-70% with best treatment
  • Refracture risk 20-30% even after union
  • Multiple surgeries often needed
  • Amputation rate 10-20% after multiple failures
Clinical Implication: CPT has challenging outcomes with 50-70% union rate even with best treatment, 20-30% refracture risk, and 10-20% ultimately requiring amputation after multiple failed reconstructions - realistic expectations essential.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Initial Assessment

EXAMINER

"A 2-year-old child presents with anterior bowing of the left tibia noted since birth. The child has multiple café-au-lait spots and a family history of neurofibromatosis. Radiographs show anterior bowing with intact medullary canal. How would you assess and manage this child?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a case of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia, Crawford Type I, associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 based on the café-au-lait spots and family history. I would take a systematic approach: First, complete assessment including evaluation for NF1 features (café-au-lait spots count and size, axillary freckling, Lisch nodules, neurofibromas), genetic testing if indicated, and assessment of the tibial deformity. Second, obtain full-length radiographs to measure the bowing angle, assess medullary canal status, and evaluate for any cystic changes. Third, initiate pre-fracture management with a total contact PTB (patellar-tendon-bearing) orthosis to protect from fracture, activity modification, and close follow-up with serial radiographs. I would counsel the parents that bracing delays but does not prevent eventual fracture, that prophylactic IM rod may be considered if deformity progresses, and that if fracture occurs, treatment becomes much more complex with lower success rates. I would also discuss the NF1 association and its implications for prognosis.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize Crawford Type I (anterior bowing, intact canal)
Identify NF1 association (café-au-lait spots, family history)
Pre-fracture management: PTB brace, activity modification
Counsel about eventual fracture risk and treatment complexity
Discuss NF1 implications for prognosis
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing NF1 association - affects prognosis significantly
✗Not initiating bracing early - may delay fracture
✗Promising that bracing will prevent fracture - it delays but doesn't prevent
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the deformity progresses despite bracing?"
"When would you consider prophylactic IM rod?"
"What are the treatment options if fracture occurs?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Established Pseudarthrosis

EXAMINER

"A 5-year-old child with known CPT and NF1 presents with an established pseudarthrosis (Crawford Type IV) after a fracture 6 months ago. Previous treatment with casting failed. The pseudarthrosis site is mobile. What is your treatment approach?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is Crawford Type IV - established pseudarthrosis requiring surgical reconstruction. The gold standard treatment is vascularized fibula transfer combined with Williams telescoping IM rod. I would plan a comprehensive procedure: First, complete excision of all hamartomatous tissue and the pseudarthrosis site, removing abnormal periosteum. Second, harvest contralateral vascularized fibula with preservation of peroneal vessels. Third, microsurgical transfer with anastomosis of peroneal vessels to recipient vessels (anterior tibial or posterior tibial), positioning the fibula in the tibial defect. Fourth, insert Williams telescoping IM rod through calcaneus and talus into tibia for mechanical stability. Fifth, may augment with BMP to enhance healing. Postoperatively, I would use long leg cast for 3-6 months with non-weight bearing, then protected weight-bearing and long-term PTB brace. I would counsel the parents that union rate is 50-70% even with this gold standard treatment, that multiple surgeries may be needed, that refracture risk is 20-30% even after union, and that amputation may be required if multiple reconstructions fail.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize Type IV (established pseudarthrosis)
Gold standard: vascularized fibula transfer + IM rod
Excision of hamartomatous tissue is essential
Microsurgical technique required
Realistic expectations: 50-70% union rate
COMMON TRAPS
✗Suggesting non-vascularized graft - much lower success rate
✗Not excising hamartomatous tissue - will fail
✗Unrealistic expectations - must discuss high failure rate
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if vascularized fibula transfer is not available?"
"How do you manage if union fails?"
"When would you consider amputation?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Failed Reconstruction

EXAMINER

"A 10-year-old child with CPT and NF1 has undergone 3 previous attempts at reconstruction (2 vascularized fibula transfers, 1 Ilizarov) all of which failed. The pseudarthrosis persists, there is significant limb length discrepancy (8cm), and the ankle is stiff and deformed. The family is asking about further treatment options. How would you counsel them?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a critical situation - multiple failed reconstructions with persistent pseudarthrosis. I would take a compassionate but realistic approach: First, acknowledge the difficulty of the situation and the family's frustration. Second, assess the current status including the pseudarthrosis site, limb length discrepancy, ankle function, and overall limb function. Third, discuss treatment options: One option is another attempt at reconstruction, possibly with a different approach (e.g., if vascularized fibula failed, consider Ilizarov bone transport, or vice versa), but I would emphasize that success rate decreases with each failure and is now likely under 30%. Another option is amputation (below-knee or through-knee) with prosthetic fitting - this provides definitive treatment, allows return to activities, and may actually improve function compared to a non-functional limb. I would recommend amputation in this situation given the multiple failures, significant LLD, and poor ankle function. I would counsel that amputation is not a failure but a reasonable treatment option that can restore function and quality of life. I would involve prosthetist in discussion and provide support for the family's decision.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize critical situation - multiple failures
Realistic assessment: success rate now very low (under 30%)
Amputation is reasonable option, not failure
May improve function compared to non-functional limb
Compassionate counseling essential
COMMON TRAPS
✗Continuing with more reconstructions despite multiple failures
✗Presenting amputation as failure rather than treatment option
✗Not providing realistic expectations about success rates
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the functional outcomes of amputation vs continued reconstruction?"
"How do you support the family through this decision?"
"What are the long-term implications of amputation in a child?"

MCQ Practice Points

NF1 Association Question

Q: What percentage of congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia cases are associated with neurofibromatosis type 1? A: 50-90% - CPT has a strong association with NF1. Always assess for café-au-lait spots (over 6 spots over 1.5cm), axillary freckling, Lisch nodules, and family history. NF1-positive cases have worse prognosis.

Crawford Classification Question

Q: What is the gold standard treatment for Crawford Type IV (established pseudarthrosis) congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia? A: Vascularized fibula transfer combined with Williams telescoping IM rod - this achieves the best union rates (50-70%). The vascularized fibula preserves blood supply, enhancing healing compared to non-vascularized grafts.

Treatment Success Rate Question

Q: What is the union rate for congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia with the gold standard treatment (vascularized fibula transfer)? A: 50-70% - even with the best treatment (vascularized fibula transfer + IM rod), union rate is only 50-70%. This reflects the challenging nature of the condition. Multiple surgeries are often needed, and amputation may be required after 3-4 failures.

Pre-Fracture Management Question

Q: What is the treatment for Crawford Type I/II (pre-fracture) congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia? A: Total contact PTB (patellar-tendon-bearing) orthosis with activity modification - bracing delays but does not prevent eventual fracture. Prophylactic IM rod may be considered if deformity progresses. Early intervention is key.

Williams Rod Question

Q: What is the advantage of the Williams telescoping intramedullary rod in congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia? A: Allows growth while maintaining stability - the telescoping design allows the rod to lengthen as the child grows, maintaining mechanical stability throughout growth. It is inserted through the calcaneus and talus into the tibia, though ankle stiffness is a common complication.

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

Healthcare System:

  • CPT management requires specialized pediatric orthopedic centers
  • Vascularized fibula transfer requires microsurgery expertise
  • Public hospital system provides comprehensive care
  • Multidisciplinary teams available (orthopedics, genetics, plastic surgery)

Multidisciplinary Care:

  • Pediatric orthopedic surgeon (primary)
  • Plastic surgeon (microsurgery for vascularized fibula)
  • Geneticist (NF1 diagnosis and counseling)
  • Physiotherapist (rehabilitation, bracing)
  • Prosthetist (if amputation required)
  • Psychologist (support for child and family)
  • Social worker (financial and social support)

Medicolegal Considerations:

  • Informed consent critical - high failure rate, multiple surgeries likely
  • Realistic expectations essential - 50-70% union rate, 20-30% refracture risk
  • Documentation of NF1 assessment and implications
  • Family counseling about amputation as treatment option (not failure)
  • Long-term follow-up until skeletal maturity

Research and Outcomes:

  • Australian centers contribute to international research
  • Registry data helps track long-term outcomes
  • Quality of life studies important for treatment decisions

CONGENITAL PSEUDARTHROSIS OF TIBIA

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Facts

  • •50-90% associated with NF1 - always assess
  • •Crawford classification: Type I-IV guides treatment
  • •Vascularized fibula transfer is gold standard (50-70% union)
  • •High failure rate - multiple surgeries often needed

Crawford Classification

  • •Type I: Anterior bowing, intact canal = PTB brace, prophylactic rod
  • •Type II: Anterior bowing, narrowed canal = PTB brace, prophylactic rod
  • •Type III: Cystic lesion = Prophylactic rod + bone graft
  • •Type IV: Established pseudarthrosis = Vascularized fibula + IM rod

Treatment by Type

  • •Type I/II: PTB brace (delays but doesn't prevent fracture)
  • •Type III: Prophylactic rod + bone graft
  • •Type IV: Vascularized fibula transfer (gold standard) + Williams rod
  • •Key: Excision of hamartomatous tissue essential

Surgical Pearls

  • •Vascularized fibula preserves blood supply - best union rates
  • •Williams telescoping rod allows growth while maintaining stability
  • •Excision of hamartomatous tissue is critical - will fail without it
  • •BMP may augment healing as adjunct

Complications

  • •Nonunion: 30-50% failure rate even with best treatment
  • •Refracture: 20-30% risk even after union
  • •Ankle stiffness: Common with IM rod through ankle
  • •Amputation: 10-20% after multiple failures
Quick Stats
Reading Time81 min
Related Topics

Accessory Navicular

Achondroplasia

Arthrogryposis

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease