Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

DDH Treatment Options

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

DDH Treatment Options

Comprehensive guide to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) treatment - age-based management from Pavlik harness to open reduction and osteotomies, AVN prevention, and outcomes

complete
Updated: 2025-12-19
High Yield Overview

DDH TREATMENT OPTIONS

Age-Dependent Management | AVN Prevention Critical | Early Diagnosis Essential | 95% Success with Pavlik

1:1000Incidence of DDH
95%Pavlik harness success (0-6mo)
7:1Female to male ratio
20%AVN risk with closed reduction

AGE-BASED TREATMENT

0-6 months
PatternPavlik harness
Treatment95% success, first-line treatment
6-18 months
PatternClosed reduction + spica
TreatmentEUA with arthrogram, safe zone critical
18 months-3 years
PatternOpen reduction
TreatmentMedial or anterior approach
Over 3 years
PatternOpen reduction + osteotomy
TreatmentFemoral and/or pelvic osteotomy

Critical Must-Knows

  • Age determines treatment: 0-6mo = Pavlik, 6-18mo = closed reduction, 18mo-3yr = open reduction, over 3yr = open reduction + osteotomy
  • AVN is most devastating complication - always results from treatment, not disease. Prevention: avoid forced abduction over 55°, human position in spica
  • Pavlik harness positioning: Flexion 100-110°, abduction 50-70°, wear 23 hours/day, monitor with ultrasound every 3-4 weeks
  • Safe zone concept: Range between redislocation and AVN risk positions. Must be at least 25° for closed reduction to succeed
  • Graf ultrasound classification: Type I (normal), II (immature/dysplastic), III (subluxed), IV (dislocated)

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Know age-based treatment algorithm - examiners frequently test this
  • "
    AVN prevention is key - describe human position (100° flexion, 40-50° abduction, neutral rotation)
  • "
    Pavlik harness failure: discontinue if not reduced by 3-4 weeks to prevent AVN
  • "
    Obstacles to reduction: psoas, ligamentum teres, pulvinar, limbus, transverse acetabular ligament, capsule, adductors

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

AP pelvis radiograph showing left developmental dysplasia of the hip
Click to expand
AP pelvis radiograph of an 8-month-old female with left developmental dysplasia of the hip following failed Pavlik harness treatment. The left femoral head is dislocated superolaterally with a shallow acetabulum. The right hip is normally located for comparison. Note the unossified femoral head epiphyses typical of this age. This case required progression to closed reduction under anesthesia with arthrogram assessment.Credit: Takeuchi R et al. via Clin Pract (CC BY)
Abduction brace applied to infant demonstrating proper positioning
Click to expand
Abduction brace applied to an infant model demonstrating correct positioning for DDH treatment. The brace maintains the hips in flexion (approximately 100 degrees) and abduction (50-70 degrees) - the 'human position' that minimizes AVN risk while maintaining hip reduction. This type of device is used as an alternative or adjunct to the Pavlik harness in children up to 6 months old.Credit: Wahlen R et al. via Adv Orthop (CC BY)

Critical DDH Treatment Exam Points

Age Determines Treatment

Treatment is age-dependent. 0-6 months: Pavlik harness (95% success). 6-18 months: Closed reduction + spica. 18 months-3 years: Open reduction. Over 3 years: Open reduction + osteotomy. Never use Pavlik over 6-7 months.

AVN Prevention is Critical

AVN always results from treatment, not disease. Prevention: avoid abduction over 55°, use human position in spica (100° flexion, 40-50° abduction, neutral rotation), discontinue Pavlik if not reduced by 3-4 weeks. AVN rates: Pavlik 5-10%, closed reduction 20%, open reduction 10-20%.

Pavlik Harness Principles

Positioning: Flexion 100-110° (anterior strap), abduction 50-70° (posterior strap). Wear 23 hours/day initially. Monitor with ultrasound every 3-4 weeks. Discontinue if not reduced by 3-4 weeks (AVN risk increases).

Safe Zone Concept

Safe zone: Range between redislocation and AVN risk positions. Must be at least 25° for closed reduction to succeed. Assessed with arthrogram during EUA. Adductor tenotomy widens safe zone if narrow.

DDH Treatment by Age - Quick Reference

Age GroupTreatmentKey PrinciplesSuccess Rate
0-6 monthsPavlik harnessFlexion 100-110°, abduction 50-70°, monitor with USS95% success
6-18 monthsClosed reduction + spicaEUA with arthrogram, safe zone over 25 degrees, human position80-90% success
18 months-3 yearsOpen reductionMedial (under 12mo) or anterior (over 12mo) approach85-90% success
Over 3 yearsOpen reduction + osteotomyFemoral shortening/varus + pelvic osteotomy70-80% success
Mnemonic

BREECHDDH Risk Factors

B
Breech presentation
20% of DDH were breech vs 2% population
R
Relaxin sensitivity
Females more sensitive (7:1 ratio)
E
Ethnicity
Caucasian, Lapland, Native American (high risk)
E
Extended family history
12% if parents had DDH
C
Calcaneovalgus
5% risk of associated DDH
H
Hip packaging disorders
Torticollis, CTEV, metatarsus adductus

Memory Hook:BREECH babies and females are at highest risk for DDH!

Mnemonic

PLACTSObstacles to Reduction

P
Psoas tendon
Tight psoas prevents reduction - release required
L
Ligamentum teres
Elongated, hypertrophied - excise
A
Adductors
Tight adductors - tenotomy widens safe zone
C
Capsule
Inverted, hourglass constriction - incise
T
Transverse acetabular ligament
Tight inferiorly - release
S
Pulvinar (soft tissue)
Fibrofatty tissue in acetabulum - excise

Memory Hook:PLACTS - all obstacles must be addressed for successful reduction!

Mnemonic

FLEX ABDPavlik Harness Positioning

F
Flexion 100-110°
Anterior strap controls flexion
L
Limited abduction initially
Start 50-70°, adjust based on USS
E
Every 3-4 weeks USS
Monitor reduction progress
X
eXclude if not reduced by 3-4 weeks
Discontinue to prevent AVN
A
Abduction 50-70°
Posterior strap controls abduction
B
Brace 23 hours/day
Wear continuously initially
D
Discontinue if failure
Switch to closed reduction if not reduced

Memory Hook:FLEX ABD - proper positioning prevents AVN and ensures success!

Overview and Epidemiology

Why This Topic Matters

Developmental dysplasia of the hip is the most common hip disorder in infants. Early diagnosis and age-appropriate treatment are essential to prevent long-term disability, AVN, and early osteoarthritis. Understanding the age-based treatment algorithm and AVN prevention strategies is critical for exam success.

Epidemiology

  • Incidence: 1 in 1000 live births
  • Gender: Female predominance 7:1 (relaxin sensitivity)
  • Laterality: Left hip 60% (fetal position), bilateral 20%
  • Risk factors: Breech (20% vs 2% population), family history (12%), firstborn, packaging disorders
  • Ethnicity: Higher in Caucasian, Lapland, Native American populations

Natural History

  • 1 in 60 abnormal at birth but 60% stabilize by 1 week, 88% by 2 months
  • Untreated DDH: Leads to abnormal gait, limb shortening, early osteoarthritis
  • Early treatment: Excellent outcomes with 95% success in Pavlik harness
  • Late treatment: Worse outcomes, higher AVN risk, may require multiple surgeries

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Pathoanatomy of DDH

DDH represents a spectrum from mild acetabular dysplasia to complete dislocation. Pathoanatomy includes: shallow acetabulum, labral hypertrophy and inversion, capsular laxity, ligamentum teres elongation, pulvinar (fibrofatty tissue) development in acetabulum, and secondary femoral head changes. Understanding these changes guides treatment approach.

StructureNormalDDH ChangesClinical Significance
AcetabulumDeep, covers 50%+ of headShallow, covers less than 50%Reduced coverage, instability
LabrumNormal size, evertedHypertrophied, invertedBlocks reduction, requires release
CapsuleNormal tensionLax, hourglass constrictionPrevents reduction, requires release
Ligamentum teresNormal sizeElongated, hypertrophiedObstacle to reduction, excise
PulvinarMinimalFibrofatty tissue in acetabulumObstacle to reduction, excise
Femoral headSpherical, centeredMay be flattened, displacedSecondary changes from dislocation

Acetabular Development

  • Normal: Acetabular index 30° at birth, decreases to 20° by 24 months
  • DDH: Elevated acetabular index, shallow acetabulum
  • Remodeling potential: Up to 5 years of age
  • After 5 years: Limited remodeling, may need osteotomy

Femoral Head Changes

  • Early: May be normal if recently dislocated
  • Chronic: Flattening, loss of sphericity
  • Ossification: Delayed in dislocated hip
  • After reduction: May remodel if reduced early

Classification Systems

2-panel imaging showing DDH assessment with CT and X-ray
Click to expand
Two-panel imaging assessment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Left panel: Axial CT through the pelvis demonstrating acetabular index measurement of 62° on the left hip (normal less than 30° at 1 year), indicating significant acetabular dysplasia. Right panel: AP pelvis radiograph of the same infant showing the right hip with superolateral subluxation, delayed ossification of the femoral head, and shallow acetabulum - classic radiographic DDH findings.Credit: Schur MD et al. via J Child Orthop (CC BY)

Graf Classification (Ultrasound)

Graf TypeAlpha AngleBeta AngleDescriptionTreatment
Type IOver 60°Under 60°Normal hipObservation
Type II43-60°55-77°Immature or dysplasticMonitor or Pavlik
Type IIIUnder 43°Over 77°SubluxedPavlik harness
Type IVUnder 43°Over 77°DislocatedPavlik harness

Graf Classification Key Points

Alpha angle (bony acetabular coverage): Normal over 60°. Beta angle (cartilaginous coverage): Normal under 60°. Type III and IV require treatment with Pavlik harness. Ultrasound is imaging modality of choice under 4-6 months (cartilaginous head not visible on X-ray).

Radiographic Measurements (Over 4-6 Months)

MeasurementNormalDDHClinical Significance
Acetabular Index30° at birth, 20° at 24moElevated, over 30°Indicates dysplasia
Shenton's LineContinuous arcBrokenIndicates subluxation/dislocation
Center-Edge AngleOver 20° (after age 5)Under 20°Indicates dysplasia
Reimer IndexUnder 25%Over 25%Head not covered by acetabulum

Radiographic Timing

X-rays used after 4-6 months when femoral head ossifies. Before this, ultrasound is required. Key lines: Shenton's (broken = subluxed), Hilgenreiner's (horizontal through triradiate), Perkin's (vertical through lateral acetabulum edge).

Clinical Assessment

Neonatal Examination

  • Ortolani test: Abduction and gentle pressure over GT - clunk indicates reduction
  • Barlow test: Adduction and posterior pressure - clunk indicates subluxation
  • Reliability: Unreliable after 2-3 months as soft tissues tighten
  • Other signs: Asymmetric creases, limited abduction (under 60°), Galeazzi sign (unilateral only)

Older Infant/Child

  • Limited abduction: Primary sign after 3 months
  • Limb length discrepancy: Unilateral cases
  • Gait abnormality: Waddling gait in bilateral, Trendelenburg in unilateral
  • Asymmetric skin creases: May be present but not diagnostic

Clinical Examination Findings

AgeKey FindingsTestsReliability
0-3 monthsOrtolani/Barlow positiveOrtolani, Barlow testsReliable
3-12 monthsLimited abductionAbduction ROM, Galeazzi signModerately reliable
Over 12 monthsLimp, LLD, limited ROMGait assessment, ROMLess reliable - imaging key

Investigations

Ultrasound (Under 4-6 Months):

  • Timing: Most useful from 4-6 weeks until femoral head ossifies
  • Graf classification: Alpha angle (bony coverage, normal over 60°), beta angle (cartilaginous, normal under 60°)
  • Dynamic assessment: Evaluates stability during movement
  • Monitoring: Repeat every 3-4 weeks during Pavlik treatment

Radiographs (Over 4-6 Months):

  • AP pelvis: Assess acetabular index, Shenton's line, head position
  • Frog-leg lateral: Assess femoral head coverage, version
  • Measurements: Acetabular index (normal under 30° at 1 year), center-edge angle (after age 5)

Arthrogram (During EUA for Closed Reduction):

  • Normal findings: Sharp labrum (rose thorn sign), minimal medial pooling
  • Abnormal findings: Widened medial joint space (pooling over 5mm), blunted labrum, hourglass constriction
  • Safe zone assessment: Determines abduction range maintaining reduction without AVN risk

Management Algorithm

Treatment Algorithm by Age

0-6 Months: Pavlik Harness

  • First-line treatment for dislocatable/dislocated hips
  • Positioning: Flexion 100-110°, abduction 50-70°
  • Wear 23 hours/day initially, wean over 2-4 months
  • Monitor with ultrasound every 3-4 weeks
  • Success rate: 95% for Graf III/IV detected early
  • Discontinue if not reduced by 3-4 weeks (AVN risk)

6-18 Months: Closed Reduction

  • Examination under anaesthesia with arthrogram
  • Assess reduction quality and safe zone
  • Adductor tenotomy if safe zone narrow (under 25°)
  • Spica cast: 100° flexion, 40-50° abduction, neutral rotation
  • Cast for 3 months, change at 6 weeks
  • Success rate: 80-90% if adequate safe zone

18 Months-3 Years: Open Reduction

  • Indicated when closed reduction fails
  • Medial approach (Ludloff, Ferguson) under 12 months
  • Anterior approach (Smith-Petersen) over 12 months
  • Address obstacles to reduction
  • May need femoral shortening if tight

Over 3 Years: Open Reduction + Osteotomy

  • Open reduction always required
  • Femoral varus and shortening osteotomy
  • Pelvic osteotomy for residual dysplasia
  • More complex, higher complication risk

This age-based approach ensures optimal outcomes while minimizing complications.

Detailed Treatment Options

TreatmentAgeTechniqueSuccess RateAVN Risk
Pavlik harness0-6 monthsFlexion 100-110°, abduction 50-70°95%5-10%
Closed reduction6-18 monthsEUA + arthrogram + spica80-90%20%
Open reduction (medial)9-12 monthsLudloff/Ferguson approach85-90%10%
Open reduction (anterior)Over 12 monthsSmith-Petersen approach85-90%10-20%
Open reduction + osteotomyOver 3 yearsFemoral + pelvic osteotomy70-80%15-25%

Surgical Technique

Hip abduction brace (Tübingen-type splint) for DDH treatment
Click to expand
Hip abduction brace (Tübingen-type splint) used for DDH treatment in infants. The device consists of a rigid central pelvic portion with padded thigh cuffs and adjustable straps to maintain the hips in the 'human position' - flexion of 100-110° and abduction of 50-70°. This allows active hip motion within the safe zone while maintaining reduction. Similar in principle to the Pavlik harness but provides more rigid positioning control.Credit: Wahlen R et al. via Adv Orthop (CC BY)

Pavlik Harness Application

Indications:

  • Graf Type III or IV (subluxed or dislocated)
  • Age 0-6 months (maximum 6-7 months)
  • Dislocatable hip on examination

Application:

  • Chest strap: Around nipple line, snug but not tight
  • Anterior strap: Controls flexion 100-110°
  • Posterior strap: Controls abduction 50-70°
  • Positioning: Hip flexed and abducted, allows active motion

Monitoring:

  • Ultrasound every 3-4 weeks
  • Check for reduction, assess Graf type improvement
  • Adjust straps as needed

Discontinuation:

  • If reduced: Gradually wean over 2-4 months
  • If not reduced by 3-4 weeks: Discontinue to prevent AVN
  • Switch to closed reduction if Pavlik fails

Complications:

  • AVN (5-10%): From forced abduction, discontinue if not reduced
  • Pavlik disease: Posterolateral acetabular wear from treatment in unreduced position
  • Recurrence: ~10% after successful treatment

Proper application and monitoring are essential for success and AVN prevention.

Closed Reduction Technique

Indications:

  • Failed Pavlik harness (not reduced by 3-4 weeks)
  • Age 6-18 months
  • Graf Type III/IV on ultrasound

Technique:

  • Examination under anaesthesia
  • Arthrogram to assess reduction quality
  • Evaluate safe zone (abduction range maintaining reduction)
  • Adductor tenotomy if safe zone narrow (under 25°)
  • Apply spica cast in human position

Human Position:

  • 100° flexion
  • 40-50° abduction (NOT over 55° to prevent AVN)
  • Neutral rotation
  • This position minimizes AVN risk

Spica Cast:

  • Duration: 3 months
  • Change cast at 6 weeks
  • Immediate MRI in spica to confirm reduction

Success Factors:

  • Adequate safe zone (over 25°)
  • Medial pooling reduces to under 5mm on arthrogram
  • Proper positioning in human position

Understanding these principles ensures successful closed reduction while minimizing AVN risk.

Open Reduction Approaches

Indications:

  • Failed closed reduction
  • Age 18 months-3 years (up to 8 years unilateral, 6 years bilateral)
  • Irreducible on arthrogram (medial pooling over 7mm)

Medial Approach (Ludloff/Ferguson):

  • Age: 9-12 months
  • Advantages: Bilateral surgery easy, adductor release part of approach, no abductor damage
  • Disadvantages: AVN risk (10%), can't reduce high dislocations, can't do pelvic osteotomy
  • Releases: Adductors, psoas, inferior capsule, pulvinar, ligamentum teres

Anterior Approach (Smith-Petersen):

  • Age: Over 12 months
  • Advantages: Better visualization, can do pelvic osteotomy, can address high dislocations
  • Disadvantages: More soft tissue dissection, abductor risk
  • Releases: All obstacles to reduction, capsular plication possible

Obstacles to Reduction:

  • Psoas tendon (tight - release)
  • Ligamentum teres (elongated - excise)
  • Pulvinar (fibrofatty tissue - excise)
  • Inverted limbus (labrum - may need release)
  • Transverse acetabular ligament (tight - release)
  • Capsule (hourglass constriction - incise)
  • Adductors (tight - tenotomy)

Systematic addressing of all obstacles ensures successful reduction.

Pelvic and Femoral Osteotomies

Pelvic Osteotomies:

Salter Innominate Osteotomy:

  • Redirectional osteotomy
  • Hinges at pubic symphysis
  • Provides anterosuperior/anterolateral coverage
  • Age: Young children (under 8 years)
  • NEVER in cerebral palsy

Pemberton Osteotomy:

  • Reshaping osteotomy
  • Hinges at triradiate cartilage (must be open)
  • Reduces acetabular volume
  • Age: Under 8 years
  • Best for young DDH

Dega Osteotomy:

  • Similar to Pemberton but extends to posterior
  • Used in neuromuscular conditions
  • Closes down posterior volume

Triple Osteotomy (Steele):

  • Redirectional osteotomy
  • Three cuts: ischium, pubis, ilium
  • Age: Older children/adolescents

PAO (Ganz/Bernese):

  • Periacetabular osteotomy
  • Redirectional
  • Age: Once triradiate closed (adolescent/adult)

Femoral Osteotomy:

  • Varus derotation osteotomy (VDRO)
  • Addresses femoral neck version and valgus
  • May include shortening if tight
  • Indicated: Over 3 years, residual dysplasia, version issues

Understanding osteotomy indications and techniques is essential for managing older DDH.

Complications

Avascular Necrosis (Most Devastating)

Incidence:

  • Pavlik harness: 5-10%
  • Closed reduction: ~20% (Salter type 1)
  • Open reduction: 10-20% (medial approach 10%, anterior approach 10-20%)

Causes:

  • Always results from treatment, not disease
  • Forced abduction over 55°
  • Extreme abduction with internal rotation and extension
  • Multiple reduction attempts
  • Early rigid casting

Kalamchi-MacEwen Classification:

  • Class I: Nucleus only - will be normal
  • Class II: Lateral physis - coxa valga from lateral physeal fusion
  • Class III: Central - moderate deformity
  • Class IV: Whole physis - severe deformity, poor outcomes

Prevention:

  • Avoid abduction over 55°
  • Use human position in spica (100° flexion, 40-50° abduction, neutral rotation)
  • Discontinue Pavlik if not reduced by 3-4 weeks
  • Gentle reduction technique
  • Avoid multiple reduction attempts

Management:

  • Established AVN: Containment procedures, may need later salvage
  • Monitor for growth disturbance, coxa magna, coxa breva, coxa vara

AVN prevention is the most important principle in DDH treatment.

Additional Complications

Residual Dysplasia:

  • May occur despite successful reduction
  • Requires monitoring with serial radiographs
  • May need later osteotomy if acetabular index remains elevated
  • Acetabular index over 30° or center-edge angle under 20° indicates dysplasia

Redislocation:

  • Occurs in 5-10% of closed reductions
  • Risk factors: Inadequate safe zone, poor positioning, cast problems
  • Management: Repeat closed reduction or open reduction

Stiffness:

  • May occur after open reduction
  • Usually improves with time and physiotherapy
  • May require manipulation or arthrolysis if severe

Limb Length Discrepancy:

  • May occur with unilateral DDH
  • Usually mild (under 2cm)
  • May require later equalization if significant

Early Osteoarthritis:

  • Even successfully treated DDH has increased OA risk
  • Late diagnosis correlates with worse outcomes
  • May require THA in adulthood

Understanding and preventing these complications is essential for optimal outcomes.

Postoperative Care

Pavlik Harness:

  • Wear 23 hours/day initially
  • Gradually wean over 2-4 months as hip stabilizes
  • Monitor with ultrasound every 3-4 weeks
  • Discontinue if not reduced by 3-4 weeks
  • Parent education on application and care

Spica Cast (Closed Reduction):

  • Duration: 3 months
  • Change cast at 6 weeks
  • Immediate MRI in spica to confirm reduction
  • Cast care: Keep dry, check for pressure areas
  • Monitor for cast problems, skin issues

Open Reduction:

  • Spica cast for 3 months postoperatively
  • Change cast at 6 weeks
  • Monitor for AVN with serial radiographs
  • Physiotherapy after cast removal
  • Long-term follow-up for residual dysplasia

Long-term Follow-up:

  • Serial radiographs: 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, then annually until skeletal maturity
  • Monitor for AVN, residual dysplasia, redislocation
  • Acetabular index should normalize by age 2-3 years
  • Center-edge angle assessment after age 5

Follow-up Key Points

Long-term follow-up is essential to monitor for AVN (may present late), residual dysplasia (may need later osteotomy), and redislocation. Serial radiographs monitor acetabular development and femoral head shape.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Early Treatment Outcomes

  • Pavlik harness: 95% success if detected early (under 6 weeks)
  • Closed reduction: 80-90% success if adequate safe zone
  • Open reduction: 85-90% success
  • Key factor: Early diagnosis and treatment

Late Treatment Outcomes

  • Over 3 years: 70-80% success, higher complication rates
  • Over 5 years: Limited remodeling potential
  • Bilateral painless dislocations: May leave alone (controversial)
  • Late diagnosis: Correlates with worse outcomes

Outcomes by Treatment Modality

TreatmentSuccess RateAVN RiskKey Factors
Pavlik (0-6mo)95%5-10%Early detection, proper positioning
Closed reduction (6-18mo)80-90%20%Adequate safe zone, human position
Open reduction (18mo-3yr)85-90%10-20%Address all obstacles, gentle technique
Open reduction + osteotomy (over 3yr)70-80%15-25%Complex, higher risk

Evidence Base

Pavlik Harness Effectiveness

Mubarak et al • J Pediatr Orthop 2003
Key Findings:
  • 95% success rate for early treatment (under 6 weeks)
  • Success drops to 80% if started after 7 weeks
  • AVN rate 5-10% with proper positioning
  • Discontinue if not reduced by 3-4 weeks to prevent AVN
Clinical Implication: Supports early diagnosis and treatment with Pavlik harness as first-line management.

AVN Prevention in DDH

Salter et al • JBJS Am 1969
Key Findings:
  • Human position reduces AVN risk
  • Abduction over 55° significantly increases AVN risk
  • Neutral rotation important for AVN prevention
  • Gentle reduction technique essential
Clinical Implication: Establishes human position as standard for spica casting to minimize AVN.

Open Reduction Outcomes

Weinstein et al • JBJS Am 1999
Key Findings:
  • 85-90% success rate before age 3 years
  • Success decreases with increasing age
  • AVN risk 10-20% depending on approach
  • Addressing all obstacles to reduction improves outcomes
Clinical Implication: Supports age-based treatment algorithm with open reduction for older children.

Long-term Outcomes of Treated DDH

Cooperman et al • JBJS Am 1983
Key Findings:
  • Early treatment produces excellent long-term outcomes
  • Low osteoarthritis risk with early treatment
  • Late diagnosis increases OA risk even after treatment
  • Emphasizes importance of early diagnosis
Clinical Implication: Highlights importance of early diagnosis and treatment for long-term outcomes.

Acetabular Remodeling Potential

Harris et al • JBJS Am 1986
Key Findings:
  • Remodeling potential up to 5 years of age
  • Limited remodeling after age 5
  • Osteotomy may be required for residual dysplasia
  • Serial monitoring essential to assess remodeling
Clinical Implication: Guides timing of osteotomy procedures for residual dysplasia.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Pavlik Harness Management

EXAMINER

"A 3-month-old infant presents with Graf Type IV DDH (dislocated hip). You decide to use Pavlik harness. Describe your management approach including positioning, monitoring, and when you would discontinue treatment."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
I would apply Pavlik harness with careful attention to positioning. Anterior strap controls flexion to 100-110°, posterior strap controls abduction to 50-70°. The harness allows active motion within safe zone while maintaining reduction. I would have the family apply it 23 hours/day initially. Monitoring: I would repeat ultrasound every 3-4 weeks to assess reduction progress and Graf type improvement. Key decision point: If hip is not reduced by 3-4 weeks, I would discontinue Pavlik harness to prevent AVN risk, which increases with forced reduction. I would then proceed to closed reduction under anaesthesia. Success rate is 95% if detected early and properly managed. AVN prevention is critical - I would ensure abduction does not exceed 55° and monitor closely for any signs of forced reduction.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Pavlik harness positioning: flexion 100-110°, abduction 50-70°, 23 hours/day
Monitor with ultrasound every 3-4 weeks to assess reduction progress
Critical decision: discontinue if not reduced by 3-4 weeks to prevent AVN
Success rate 95% if detected early (under 6 weeks)
AVN prevention: abduction must not exceed 55°, monitor for forced reduction
COMMON TRAPS
✗Continuing Pavlik beyond 3-4 weeks if not reduced - increases AVN risk
✗Exceeding 55° abduction - significantly increases AVN risk
✗Not monitoring with serial ultrasounds - may miss failed reduction
✗Not discontinuing promptly if reduction fails - forced reduction causes AVN
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the hip reduces but then redislocates?"
"How do you manage if Pavlik harness causes skin breakdown?"
"What are the signs of forced reduction on ultrasound?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Closed Reduction Decision

EXAMINER

"An 8-month-old infant with DDH failed Pavlik harness treatment. You perform examination under anaesthesia with arthrogram. The arthrogram shows medial pooling of 8mm and a safe zone of only 15°. Discuss your management."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has concerning findings: medial pooling of 8mm (over 7mm threshold indicates poor outcome and AVN risk) and safe zone of only 15° (under 25° required for closed reduction success). Given these findings, I would NOT proceed with closed reduction as it has high failure and AVN risk. Instead, I would perform adductor tenotomy to widen the safe zone. If safe zone remains inadequate after tenotomy, I would consider open reduction via medial approach (Ludloff or Ferguson) given the patient's age (8 months). The medial approach is appropriate for this age, preserves blood supply better than anterior approach, and allows addressing obstacles to reduction including adductors, psoas, pulvinar, and ligamentum teres. I would explain to parents that open reduction has higher success rate in this situation and lower AVN risk than forced closed reduction.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Medial pooling over 7mm and safe zone under 25° = contraindication to closed reduction
Adductor tenotomy may widen safe zone - attempt this first
If safe zone remains inadequate, proceed to open reduction
Medial approach (Ludloff/Ferguson) preferred under 12 months - lower AVN risk (10%)
Must address all obstacles: adductors, psoas, pulvinar, ligamentum teres
COMMON TRAPS
✗Proceeding with closed reduction despite inadequate safe zone - high failure and AVN risk
✗Not attempting adductor tenotomy first - may avoid need for open reduction
✗Using anterior approach in infant under 12 months - higher AVN risk than medial
✗Forcing reduction in inadequate safe zone - causes AVN
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if adductor tenotomy increases safe zone to 30°?"
"How do you assess obstacles to reduction during open reduction?"
"What is the difference between Ludloff and Ferguson approaches?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Older Child DDH

EXAMINER

"A 2.5-year-old child presents with untreated unilateral DDH. The hip is dislocated and irreducible. Discuss your management approach including surgical technique and expected outcomes."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a late-presenting DDH requiring open reduction. At 2.5 years, I would use anterior approach (Smith-Petersen) as it provides better visualization and allows pelvic osteotomy if needed. The approach allows addressing all obstacles to reduction: psoas tendon (release), ligamentum teres (excise), pulvinar (excise), inverted limbus (may need release), transverse acetabular ligament (release), capsule (incise hourglass constriction), and adductors (tenotomy). Given the age (2.5 years) and likely tightness, I would consider femoral shortening and varus derotation osteotomy to reduce pressure on reduction and improve joint mechanics. I would also assess acetabular dysplasia - if acetabular index remains elevated (over 30°) or center-edge angle is low (under 20°), I would consider concurrent or staged pelvic osteotomy (Pemberton or Salter). Expected outcomes: 85-90% success rate, but AVN risk 10-20%, and higher complication rates than early treatment. I would counsel parents about the increased complexity and risks compared to early treatment.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Anterior approach (Smith-Petersen) preferred over 12 months - better visualization and allows osteotomy
Must address all obstacles: psoas, ligamentum teres, pulvinar, limbus, transverse acetabular ligament, capsule, adductors
Consider femoral shortening and varus derotation osteotomy to reduce pressure and improve mechanics
Assess acetabular dysplasia - may need concurrent or staged pelvic osteotomy (Pemberton or Salter)
Expected outcomes: 85-90% success, but AVN risk 10-20%, higher complications than early treatment
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing obstacles to reduction - incomplete release causes redislocation
✗Not considering femoral shortening - excessive pressure on reduction causes AVN
✗Not assessing acetabular dysplasia - residual dysplasia requires later osteotomy
✗Underestimating complexity - late presentation has higher complication rates
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if acetabular index is 35° after reduction?"
"When would you do concurrent vs staged pelvic osteotomy?"
"How do you manage if AVN develops post-operatively?"

MCQ Practice Points

Pavlik Harness Success Rate

Q: What is the success rate of Pavlik harness for Graf Type III/IV DDH when initiated early (under 6 weeks)? A: 95% - Pavlik harness achieves 95% success rate when initiated early. Success drops to 80% if started after 7 weeks.

Most Devastating Complication

Q: The most devastating complication of DDH treatment is: A: Avascular necrosis (AVN) - AVN is the most devastating complication, causing femoral head deformity and growth disturbance. It always results from treatment, not disease.

Maximum Abduction Angle

Q: What is the maximum abduction angle in spica cast to minimize AVN risk? A: 55° - Abduction over 55° significantly increases AVN risk. Human position uses 40-50° abduction to minimize risk.

Acetabular Remodeling Potential

Q: At what age does acetabular remodeling potential significantly decrease? A: 5 years - Acetabular remodeling potential exists up to 5 years. After this, limited remodeling occurs and osteotomy may be required.

Open Reduction Approach

Q: Which approach is preferred for open reduction of DDH in a 10-month-old child? A: Medial approach (Ludloff/Ferguson) - Preferred under 12 months as it preserves blood supply and has lower AVN risk (10% vs 10-20% for anterior).

Safe Zone for Closed Reduction

Q: What is the minimum safe zone required for successful closed reduction? A: 25° - Safe zone under 25° is associated with high failure and AVN risk. Adductor tenotomy may widen safe zone.

Australian Context

Australian Screening Practices

  • Universal clinical screening: Standard in Australia
  • Selective ultrasound: For at-risk infants (breech, family history, abnormal exam)
  • Universal ultrasound: Controversial - high false-positive rate, overtreatment concerns
  • Screening effectiveness: Has not significantly reduced late diagnosis rates

Healthcare System

  • Public system: DDH treatment available, may have wait times
  • Private system: Faster access, specialized pediatric orthopaedic surgeons
  • Follow-up: Requires long-term surveillance in both systems
  • Cost: Early treatment (Pavlik) much less expensive than late treatment (surgery)

Australian Exam Context

Australian examiners may ask about screening programs, cost-effectiveness of early vs late treatment, and resource allocation. Know that selective ultrasound screening is common practice, and emphasize cost-effectiveness of early treatment (Pavlik) compared to late treatment (surgery).

DDH TREATMENT OPTIONS

High-Yield Exam Summary

Age-Based Treatment Algorithm

  • •0-6 months: Pavlik harness (95% success if early)
  • •6-18 months: Closed reduction + spica (80-90% success)
  • •18 months-3 years: Open reduction (85-90% success)
  • •Over 3 years: Open reduction + osteotomy (70-80% success)

Pavlik Harness Management

  • •Positioning: Flexion 100-110°, abduction 50-70°
  • •Wear: 23 hours/day initially
  • •Monitoring: Ultrasound every 3-4 weeks
  • •Discontinue if not reduced by 3-4 weeks (prevents AVN)
  • •Success rate: 95% if detected early (under 6 weeks)

AVN Prevention - Critical Principles

  • •Human position: 100° flexion, 40-50° abduction, neutral rotation
  • •Never exceed 55° abduction (significantly increases AVN risk)
  • •Gentle reduction - forced reduction causes AVN
  • •Discontinue Pavlik promptly if reduction fails
  • •AVN always results from treatment, not disease

Safe Zone and Closed Reduction

  • •Safe zone: Range between redislocation and AVN risk
  • •Minimum 25° required for closed reduction success
  • •Medial pooling over 7mm = poor outcome predictor
  • •Adductor tenotomy may widen safe zone
  • •If safe zone inadequate after tenotomy → open reduction

Obstacles to Reduction

  • •Psoas tendon (release)
  • •Ligamentum teres (excise)
  • •Pulvinar (excise)
  • •Inverted limbus (may need release)
  • •Transverse acetabular ligament (release)
  • •Capsule hourglass constriction (incise)
  • •Adductors (tenotomy)

Graf Classification

  • •Type I: Normal (alpha over 60°, beta under 60°)
  • •Type II: Immature (may resolve)
  • •Type III: Subluxed (needs treatment)
  • •Type IV: Dislocated (needs treatment)
  • •Ultrasound under 4-6 months (cartilaginous head)

Open Reduction Approaches

  • •Medial approach (Ludloff/Ferguson): Under 12 months, 10% AVN risk
  • •Anterior approach (Smith-Petersen): Over 12 months, 10-20% AVN risk
  • •Medial preserves blood supply better in infants
  • •Anterior allows pelvic osteotomy if needed

Pelvic Osteotomies

  • •Salter: Redirectional, young children
  • •Pemberton: Reshaping, under 8 years
  • •PAO (Periacetabular Osteotomy): Adolescent/adult
  • •Indicated if acetabular index over 30° or center-edge angle under 20°

AVN Rates by Treatment

  • •Pavlik harness: 5-10%
  • •Closed reduction: 20%
  • •Open reduction: 10-20%
  • •Late presentation: Higher complication rates
  • •AVN is most devastating complication

Key Principles

  • •Early diagnosis and treatment essential
  • •95% success with Pavlik if detected early
  • •Age-based treatment algorithm critical
  • •AVN prevention is paramount
  • •Address all obstacles to reduction
Quick Stats
Reading Time96 min
Related Topics

Accessory Navicular

Achondroplasia

Arthrogryposis

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease