Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Distal Femoral Physeal Injuries

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Distal Femoral Physeal Injuries

A comprehensive guide to Distal Femoral Physeal Injuries, covering the unique risks of this growth plate, management principles, and long-term surveillance.

complete
Updated: 2026-01-02
High Yield Overview

Distal Femoral Physeal Injuries

Protecting the Critical Physis

70%Femoral Growth
35%Leg Length
30-50%Arrest Risk
2%Vascular Injury

Salter-Harris Classification

Type I
PatternThrough physis only.
TreatmentReduction + Cast/Pins
Type II
PatternThrough physis + Metaphysis (Most Common).
TreatmentReduction + Pins
Type III
PatternThrough physis + Epiphysis (Intra-articular).
TreatmentORIF
Type IV
PatternThrough all layers.
TreatmentORIF

Critical Must-Knows

  • High Risk: Even Type II injuries have 30-50% growth disturbance rate.
  • Anatomical Reduction: Essential for all types.
  • Long-Term Follow-Up: Mandatory for at least 1-2 years.
  • Vascular Risk: Popliteal artery is close to the physis.
  • Growth Arrest Management: Bar excision or epiphysiodesis depending on bar size.

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    This is NOT a benign fracture
  • "
    Reduction must be anatomical
  • "
    Follow for growth disturbance annually
  • "
    Know bar excision indications

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Salter-Harris type 1 distal femoral physeal fracture X-rays
Click to expand
AP (left) and lateral (right) knee radiographs demonstrating a Salter-Harris type 1 fracture of the distal femur. The epiphysis is displaced from the metaphysis through the physis with no metaphyseal fragment - a pure physeal separation. SH-1 injuries account for approximately 6-8% of distal femoral physeal fractures.Credit: Shetty CM, Naik DR via PMC (CC-BY-3.0)
Salter-Harris type 2 distal femoral physeal fracture X-rays
Click to expand
Lateral (left) and AP (right) knee radiographs of the right leg demonstrating a Salter-Harris type 2 fracture of the distal femur. Asterisks mark areas of interest showing physeal separation with a triangular metaphyseal fragment (Thurston-Holland fragment). Note the significant anterior displacement of the epiphysis on the lateral view. SH-2 is the most common pattern (40-50% of distal femoral physeal injuries).Credit: Shetty CM, Naik DR via PMC (CC-BY-3.0)

The Most Dangerous Growth Plate

Critical Growth Plate

70% of femoral length comes from this physis. Growth disturbance occurs in 30-50% of injuries (even Type II).

Mandatory Counseling

ALWAYS warn families about growth arrest, angular deformity (1°/year), and LLD (1cm/year). 2-year minimum follow-up is mandatory.

Distal Femoral Physis Key Facts

FeatureImportanceClinical Relevance
70% of femur, 35% of legHighest of any physis
30-50%Even for Type II
Popliteal artery tetheredHyperextension injury
Minimum 2 yearsAnnual scanograms
Mnemonic

Distal Femur Dangers

G
Growth (70%)
Largest growth contribution
R
Risk (30-50%)
High arrest rate
O
Obligate Follow-Up
2+ years minimum
W
Warn the Family
Always counsel about risks

Memory Hook:GROW - Distal femur must grow, protect it.

Mnemonic

Complications to Watch

L
Leg Length Discrepancy
Shortening from arrest
A
Angular Deformity
Varus or valgus from partial arrest
V
Vascular Injury
Popliteal artery

Memory Hook:LAV - Watch for these.

Mnemonic

Treatment Principles

A
Anatomical Reduction
Priority
P
Pinning (Smooth)
Avoid crossing physis
S
Surveillance
Long-term

Memory Hook:APS - The treatment triad.

Overview/Epidemiology

Distal Femoral Physeal Injuries are relatively uncommon but HIGH STAKES injuries.

  • Epidemiology:
    • Account for 1-5% of all physeal injuries.
    • Mean age 11-13 years (adolescent growth spurt).
    • Boys greater than Girls (higher energy mechanisms).
  • Mechanism:
    • Hyperextension (popliteal artery at risk).
    • Varus/Valgus Stress (sports injuries, MVA).
    • Direct Trauma.

Anatomy and Pathomechanics

Physeal Anatomy

  • The distal femoral physis is the largest physis in the body.
  • It is undulating (mamillary processes interdigitate with metaphysis), providing some inherent stability but also predisposing to irregular arrest patterns.
  • The physis is completely intracapsular (no perichondral ring protection medially and laterally near the collaterals).

Growth Contribution

  • 70% of femoral length (approximately 1cm/year near peak growth).
  • 35% of total lower limb length.
  • Loss of even 1-2 years of growth equates to 1-2cm LLD.

Vascular Anatomy

  • The popliteal artery is tethered by the genicular branches as it passes through the popliteal fossa.
  • In hyperextension injuries, the artery can be stretched over the posterior metaphysis.
  • Vascular injury rate: approximately 2% for displaced fractures.

Classification Systems

Salter-Harris Classification

Applied to the Distal Femur:

Type I: Rare in isolation. Usually seen in infants (birth injuries) or pathological bone.

Type II: Most common (approximately 60%). Metaphyseal (Thurston-Holland) fragment is usually posterolateral.

Type III: Intra-articular. Usually medial condyle. Requires anatomical ORIF.

Type IV: Crosses all layers. High arrest risk. Requires ORIF.

Displacement Pattern

  • Hyperextension: Distal fragment displaces posteriorly. Vascular injury risk.
  • Varus Stress: Lateral displacement of distal fragment.
  • Valgus Stress: Medial displacement of distal fragment.

Clinical Assessment

History:

  • Mechanism: Twisting? Hyperextension? Direct blow?
  • Neurovascular Symptoms: Numbness, cold foot?

Physical Exam:

  1. Inspection: Swelling, deformity, skin tenting (posterior spike).
  2. Palpation: Tenderness around the distal femur.
  3. Neurovascular (CRITICAL): Popliteal pulse (may need Doppler), DP/PT pulses, capillary refill, foot warmth. Peroneal nerve function (foot drop).
  4. Compartments: Assess for compartment syndrome (especially with vascular injury).

Investigations

Imaging:

  • X-ray (AP and Lateral): Standard. Include the knee and proximal tibia.
  • Stress Views: May help identify occult Type I (with anesthesia if needed), but MRI is safer.
  • CT Scan: For Type III/IV to map the intra-articular fracture.
  • MRI: Useful for occult injuries or to assess physeal damage after reduction.

Vascular Assessment:

  • Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI): If pulses are diminished.
  • CT Angiography: If vascular injury is suspected (hard or soft signs).

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Distal Femoral Physeal Injury Management Algorithm
Click to expand
Visual Sketchnote Management Algorithm: Key focus on anatomical reduction and monitoring for growth arrest.Credit: OrthoVellum

Non-Displaced / Minimally Displaced Fractures

  • Long Leg Cast: Knee in 20-30 degrees flexion. 6 weeks immobilization.
  • Close follow-up with weekly X-rays for 2-3 weeks to monitor for displacement.
  • Consider prophylactic pinning even for non-displaced fractures due to the high stakes.

Displaced Type I and II

  • Closed Reduction: Gentle. Single attempt preferred.
  • Percutaneous Pinning: Smooth K-wires or cannulated screws (placed in metaphysis or epiphysis, NOT crossing intact physis).
  • Avoid Crossing the Physis: If you must, use small diameter, remove early.
  • Long Leg Cast: Post-reduction.

Type III and IV (Intra-Articular)

  • Anatomical Reduction is MANDATORY.
  • Open Reduction: Via medial or lateral approach depending on fragment location.
  • Fixation: Epiphyseal screws parallel to the joint (avoid crossing physis). Smooth K-wires are an alternative.
  • Long Leg Cast: Post-operatively.

Surgical Techniques

Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning

Indications: Displaced Type I/II with acceptable closed reduction.

Technique: Reduction under fluoroscopy. Traction and reversal of the deforming force. For hyperextension injuries, flex the knee and apply posterior force to the distal fragment. Once reduced, pass 2-3 smooth K-wires (2.0-2.4mm) from the metaphysis into the epiphysis, crossing the fracture. Place pins divergently for stability. Avoid the intercondylar notch (ACL). Cut flush or bury.

Post-op: Long leg cast for 6 weeks. Pin removal at 4-6 weeks.

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

Indications: Type III/IV, or Type II with intra-articular extension.

Technique: Medial parapatellar or lateral approach depending on fragment. Visualize the articular surface. Reduce and provisionally fix with K-wires. Definitive fixation with cannulated screws (4.0mm or 4.5mm) placed within the epiphysis, parallel to the joint surface. Avoid crossing intact physis with threaded hardware. Bone graft if significant comminution or physeal damage.

Post-op: Long leg cast for 6 weeks. Protected weight bearing.

Key Surgical Points

  • Single reduction attempt preferred to minimize additional physeal damage.
  • Avoid excessive periosteal stripping to preserve blood supply.
  • If crossing the physis is unavoidable, use smooth wires and remove early.
  • Document neurovascular status before and after reduction.

Complications

ComplicationRatePrevention/Management
Growth Arrest30-50%Anatomical reduction. Avoid iatrogenic damage.
Angular DeformityCommon (Varus/Valgus)Bar excision if less than 50%, Osteotomy if more.
Leg Length DiscrepancyCommonMonitor. Epiphysiodesis or limb lengthening.
Vascular Injury1-2%Vascular assessment. Urgent repair if injured.
Peroneal Nerve PalsyRareDocument pre-op. Avoid traction.
StiffnessVariableEarly ROM after healing.

Postoperative Care

  • Immobilization: Long leg cast for 6 weeks minimum.
  • Weight Bearing: Non-weight bearing initially, then protected WB.
  • Pin Removal: 4-6 weeks (smooth wires). Screws can be left in situ.
  • Follow-Up Schedule:
    • Weekly X-rays for first 2-3 weeks.
    • 6-week X-ray (assess healing).
    • 6-month and 12-month X-rays (scanograms to assess growth).
    • Annual follow-up until skeletal maturity.

Outcomes/Prognosis

  • Growth Arrest: Occurs in 30-50% of cases, regardless of type.
  • Type I/II: Still have significant arrest risk (25-35%).
  • Type III/IV: Higher arrest risk (40-60%).
  • Prognosis depends on: Quality of reduction, amount of growth remaining, and size of any physeal bar.
  • Functional Outcomes: Generally good if LLD and angular deformity are managed.

Evidence Base

Level IV
📚 Arkader et al
Key Findings:
  • Review of distal femoral physeal fractures
  • Overall growth disturbance rate 52%
  • No difference between SH types for arrest rate
Clinical Implication: ALL types are high risk. Warn families accordingly.
Source: J Pediatr Orthop 2007

Level IV
📚 Eid and Hafez
Key Findings:
  • Anatomical reduction reduces arrest rate
  • Non-anatomical reduction associated with higher LLD
  • Recommend aggressive reduction
Clinical Implication: Anatomical reduction is critical.
Source: J Pediatr Orthop B 2002

Level IV
📚 Leary et al
Key Findings:
  • Complications in distal femoral physeal fractures
  • 52% overall complication rate
  • 24% required secondary procedures
Clinical Implication: Expect complications. Counsel appropriately.
Source: J Pediatr Orthop 2009

Level IV
📚 Thomson et al
Key Findings:
  • Vascular injury in distal femoral fractures
  • Hyperextension mechanism is highest risk
  • Document vascular status diligently
Clinical Implication: Always check vascularity.
Source: Injury 1995

Level IV
📚 Riseborough et al
Key Findings:
  • Long-term follow-up of distal femoral physeal injuries
  • LLD and angular deformity are common
  • Bar excision successful if less than 50%
Clinical Implication: Plan for long-term surveillance.
Source: JBJS Am 1983

Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

The Displaced SH II Distal Femur

EXAMINER

"12-year-old with a Salter-Harris Type II distal femur fracture with posterior displacement of the distal fragment. Pulses palpable."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This is a **high-risk injury**. Even though pulses are palpable, I would document the vascular status carefully (ABI if any concern). This likely occurred via a **hyperextension mechanism**. I would perform **gentle closed reduction** under general anesthesia - flexing the knee and applying posterior force. Once reduced, I would **percutaneously pin** with smooth K-wires (2-3 wires, divergent). Post-op in a long leg cast. I would counsel the family about the **30-50% risk of growth disturbance** and arrange long-term follow-up with scanograms.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
High-risk injury
Closed reduction and pinning
Warn about growth arrest
COMMON TRAPS
✗Casting without pinning (high failure rate)
✗Not warning the family about growth problems
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you manage this if the pulses were absent?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Absent Pulses After Distal Femur Injury

EXAMINER

"Same patient as above. After closed reduction, the foot is cold and the DP pulse is not palpable."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This is a **vascular emergency**. The popliteal artery may be injured (stretched, intimal tear, thrombosis). I would immediately obtain an **ABI**. If less than 0.9, or if the foot remains cold, I would request an **urgent CT angiography** and involve the **vascular surgery team**. If there is clear arterial injury, **surgical exploration and repair** is needed urgently (within 6 hours to prevent irreversible ischemia). The fracture should be stabilized (external fixation if needed) to facilitate vascular repair. Fasciotomy may be required for reperfusion injury.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Vascular emergency
ABI and CTA
Urgent vascular surgery involvement
COMMON TRAPS
✗Waiting and observing
✗Delaying surgery for further imaging
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How long can the limb tolerate ischemia?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Growth Arrest After Treated Distal Femur Fracture

EXAMINER

"10-year-old, 1 year post Type II distal femur fracture. Now has 2.5cm LLD and 10 degrees of valgus."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This is a **growth arrest** with a **physeal bar** causing both shortening and angular deformity. I would get an **MRI** to map the bar. The child has significant growth remaining. If the bar is **less than 50%** of the physis width, I would consider **bar excision** with fat interposition, combined with an **osteotomy** to correct the existing angular deformity. If the bar is **greater than 50%**, bar excision will fail. I would then perform **contralateral epiphysiodesis** (to equalize limb lengths) and a corrective **osteotomy** for the angular deformity.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Bar excision if less than 50%
Osteotomy for angular deformity
Contralateral epiphysiodesis if bar is large
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting bar excision on a large bar
✗Only addressing LLD but not the angular deformity
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you perform physeal bar excision?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Consent for Distal Femoral Physeal Fracture Surgery

EXAMINER

"You are consenting a family for CRPP of a displaced SH II distal femur. What specific risks do you discuss?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

I would explain that this is a **high-risk growth plate injury**. Specific risks I would discuss include: **Growth disturbance (30-50% chance)** leading to leg length discrepancy or a crooked leg, even with perfect surgery. **Vascular injury** (the artery is close). **Nerve injury** (peroneal nerve). **Stiffness** of the knee. **Infection** (low risk). **Need for further surgery** (bar excision, osteotomy, epiphysiodesis). I would emphasize that **long-term follow-up with X-rays for at least 2 years** is essential.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
High growth disturbance risk
Long-term follow-up mandatory
May need further surgery
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not mentioning the growth disturbance risk
✗Promising a perfect outcome
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you monitor for growth disturbance?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

The Birth Injury

EXAMINER

"A neonate is noted to have decreased movement of the right leg after a difficult delivery. X-ray shows physeal widening at the distal femur."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This is a **birth-related distal femoral physeal injury** - typically a Type I fracture. The mechanism is usually hyperextension during breech delivery. The epiphysis may appear displaced on ultrasound due to lack of ossification. Management: **Splinting in comfortable flexion** for 2-3 weeks. Prognosis is generally excellent with rapid healing and minimal growth disturbance risk, though follow-up is still advisable.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Birth trauma Type I
Splinting for comfort
Good prognosis
COMMON TRAPS
✗Aggressive reduction attempts in a neonate
✗Missing the diagnosis due to lack of ossification
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you diagnose this if the X-ray is inconclusive?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

The Adolescent Athlete

EXAMINER

"16-year-old footballer with a valgus stress injury to the knee. Tender over the medial femoral condyle physis. X-ray shows a Salter-Harris III pattern."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This is a **Type III physeal injury** of the distal femur (medial condyle). It is intra-articular. I would obtain a **CT scan** to map the fracture. Management: **Anatomical ORIF** is mandatory. I would perform open reduction via a medial approach and fix with cannulated screws placed within the epiphysis, parallel to the joint. Post-op in a long leg cast for 6 weeks. This patient has minimal growth remaining (age 16), but I would still arrange follow-up scanograms.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Type III = intra-articular = ORIF
CT for planning
Epiphyseal screw fixation
COMMON TRAPS
✗Closed treatment for an intra-articular fracture
✗Crossing the physis with large screws
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the growth arrest risk given his age?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

The Polytrauma Patient

EXAMINER

"8-year-old polytrauma after MVA. Bilateral distal femoral physeal fractures (Type II). Hemodynamically stable after resuscitation."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This is a **bilateral high-risk physeal injury** in the setting of polytrauma. Once the patient is hemodynamically stable and ATLS resuscitation is complete, I would prioritize **fracture stabilization** to facilitate nursing care and reduce pain. I would perform **closed reduction and percutaneous pinning** of both sides in a single surgery. Post-op in bilateral long leg casts. Given the bilateral nature and young age, I would counsel the family extensively about the high risk of growth disturbance and arrange meticulous long-term follow-up.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
ATLS first
Bilateral fixation in one session
High growth arrest risk
COMMON TRAPS
✗Rushing to surgery before stabilization
✗Underestimating the growth implications
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you monitor for growth arrest bilaterally?"

MCQ Practice Points

Anatomy MCQ

Q: What percentage of femoral length does the distal femoral physis contribute? A: 70%. This is the highest of any physis in the body.

Prognosis MCQ

Q: What is the approximate growth arrest rate for distal femoral physeal fractures? A: 30-50%, regardless of Salter-Harris type.

Vascular MCQ

Q: What vascular structure is at risk in distal femoral physeal injuries? A: Popliteal Artery. It is tethered by genicular branches and can be injured in hyperextension.

Treatment MCQ

Q: What fixation method is preferred for Type II distal femoral physeal fractures? A: Smooth K-wire percutaneous pinning (avoids crossing intact physis with threaded hardware).

Bar Excision MCQ

Q: What is the maximum physeal bar size amenable to bar excision? A: Less than 50% of the physis width, with at least 2 years of growth remaining.

Follow-up MCQ

Q: How long should patients with distal femoral physeal injuries be followed? A: At least 2 years with annual scanograms to skeletal maturity to detect growth disturbance.

Australian Context

  • Tertiary Care: Complex distal femoral physeal injuries should be managed at tertiary pediatric centers.
  • Vascular Surgery: Immediate vascular surgery availability is essential for displaced injuries.
  • Imaging: EOS for scanograms is increasingly available for growth monitoring.
  • Medicolegal: Failure to warn about growth disturbance is a common source of complaints.

DISTAL FEMORAL PHYSEAL INJURIES

High-Yield Exam Summary

KEY FACTS

  • •70% Femoral Growth
  • •35% Leg Length
  • •30-50% Arrest Rate
  • •Popliteal Artery Risk

TREATMENT

  • •Anatomical Reduction
  • •Smooth Pin Fixation
  • •Avoid Crossing Physis
  • •6+ Week Immobilization

COMPLICATIONS

  • •Growth Arrest
  • •LLD
  • •Angular Deformity
  • •Vascular Injury

FOLLOW-UP

  • •Weekly X-rays (2-3 wks)
  • •6-Month Scanogram
  • •Annual to Maturity
  • •Warn Family

Deep Dive: Managing Growth Arrest

Types of Arrest

  • Complete Arrest: Entire physis stops growing. Results in shortening only (no angular deformity).
  • Partial (Central) Arrest: Bar in the center. Causes shortening and may cause "tenting" of the physis.
  • Partial (Peripheral) Arrest: Bar on one side. Causes angular deformity as the unaffected side keeps growing.

Evaluation

  • Scanogram: Leg length measurement.
  • MRI: Maps the physeal bar (location, size).
  • Bone Age: Estimate remaining growth.

Management Options

  • Bar less than 50%, Greater than 2 years growth remaining: Bar excision + fat/PMMA interposition.
  • Bar greater than 50%, or Less than 2 years growth remaining: Bar excision will fail. Consider:
    • Contralateral epiphysiodesis (for LLD).
    • Limb lengthening (for significant LLD).
    • Corrective osteotomy (for angular deformity).
    • Guided growth (hemi-epiphysiodesis for angular correction if some growth remains).

Self-Assessment Quiz

Parent's Guide: Understanding Distal Femoral Injuries

What is the distal femoral growth plate? The distal femur (thighbone near the knee) has a growth plate that is responsible for 70% of the thighbone's growth. Injury to this growth plate is serious because it can affect how your child's leg grows.

Why is this injury different? Unlike most other growth plate injuries, the distal femoral growth plate has a HIGH chance (30-50%) of developing problems with growth, even if the treatment is perfect. This may lead to:

  • One leg being shorter than the other.
  • One leg growing crooked.

What are the treatment options if growth problems occur? If growth problems develop, your doctor may recommend:

  • Surgery to remove the damaged area and allow growth to resume.
  • Surgery on the opposite leg to slow its growth (so the legs end up the same length).
  • Surgery to straighten a crooked leg.

What follow-up is needed? Your child will need regular X-rays for at least 2 years to monitor the growth plate. Please do not miss these appointments, as early detection of problems allows for better treatment.

Rehabilitation Protocol

Phase 1: Immobilization (0-6 weeks)

  • Long leg cast. Knee in 20-30 degrees of flexion.
  • Non-weight bearing on affected limb.
  • Encourage toe wiggling and calf pumps to prevent DVT.
  • Hip and ankle ROM exercises (within cast constraints).

Phase 2: Early Mobilization (6-10 weeks)

  • Cast removal at 6 weeks if healing confirmed.
  • Hinged knee brace initially.
  • Partial weight bearing progressing to full weight bearing.
  • Active and passive ROM for the knee.
  • Quadriceps and hamstring isometrics.

Phase 3: Strengthening (10-16 weeks)

  • Progressive resistance exercises.
  • Closed kinetic chain exercises (squats, leg press).
  • Proprioception and balance training.
  • Gait normalization.

Phase 4: Return to Activity (4-6 months)

  • Sport-specific training.
  • Full ROM and greater than 90% strength.
  • Clearance by surgeon (confirm no growth disturbance).

Differential Diagnosis

Knee Pain After Trauma in Adolescents:

  • Distal Femoral Physeal Fracture: Point tenderness over the distal femoral physis.
  • Patellar Dislocation: Apprehension sign positive. Patella may be back in place.
  • ACL Tear: Hemarthrosis. Lachman positive. Usually post-skeletal maturity.
  • Tibial Eminence Fracture: Extension block. X-ray shows avulsed tibial spine.
  • Meniscal Injury: Locking, clicking. Usually after twisting.
  • Proximal Tibial Physeal Fracture: Tenderness over the proximal tibial physis.
  • Pathological Fracture: Through tumor. Night pain, constitutional symptoms.

Key Differentiators:

  • Point tenderness over the physis indicates physeal injury.
  • Hemarthrosis is common in ligament tears and intra-articular fractures.
  • Always get a good lateral X-ray to assess the physis.

Surgical Pearls

Reduction Technique

  • Apply longitudinal traction with the knee slightly flexed.
  • For hyperextension injuries (posterior displacement of the distal fragment), flex the knee and push the distal fragment anteriorly.
  • Avoid excessive force. One smooth reduction attempt is better than multiple aggressive attempts.

Pinning Technique

  • Enter from the lateral and medial metaphysis, above the physis.
  • Direct the wires across the fracture into the epiphysis.
  • Diverge the wires for three-point fixation stability.
  • Avoid the intercondylar notch (risk of ACL damage).
  • Image in two planes (AP and lateral) to confirm position.

Avoiding Iatrogenic Damage

  • Use smooth wires (not threaded).
  • If threaded screws are used (for epiphyseal fixation), ensure they are parallel to the physis and do not cross it.
  • Limit drill passes through the physis.
  • Use small diameter implants.

Post-Reduction Checks

  • Confirm neurovascular status immediately.
  • Document pulses both before and after reduction.
  • Obtain X-rays to confirm anatomical reduction.

Comparison: Distal Femur vs Other Physes

Distal Femur vs Other High-Risk Physes

FeatureDistal FemurProximal TibiaDistal Radius
70% femur55% tibia75% radius
30-50%20-30%Less than 5%
Popliteal arteryPopliteal arteryRare
HighHighLow
Quick Stats
Reading Time72 min
Related Topics

Accessory Navicular

Achondroplasia

Arthrogryposis

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease