Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Neurofibromatosis

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Neurofibromatosis

Comprehensive guide to orthopaedic manifestations of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 including scoliosis, tibial dysplasia, and congenital pseudarthrosis.

complete
Updated: 2025-12-23
High Yield Overview

Neurofibromatosis Type 1

NF1 Orthopaedic Challenges

NF1 Gene MutationGenetics
Autosomal DominantInheritance
1 in 3,000Incidence
10-30%Scoliosis

Orthopaedic Issues

Dystrophic Scoliosis
PatternSharp, angular, poor prognosis.
TreatmentEarly fusion
Non-Dystrophic Scoliosis
PatternSimilar to idiopathic.
TreatmentStandard management
Tibial Dysplasia
PatternAnterolateral bowing, pseudarthrosis.
TreatmentBracing, Ilizarov

Critical Must-Knows

  • Dystrophic Scoliosis: Sharp, angular curve with poor prognosis.
  • Tibial Dysplasia: Anterolateral bowing → pseudarthrosis risk.
  • Cafe-au-lait Spots: greater than 6 spots greater than 5mm (prepubertal).
  • NF1 Gene: Tumor suppressor (neurofibromin).
  • Surgery is challenging: High failure rates.

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Dystrophic vs non-dystrophic scoliosis
  • "
    Anterolateral tibial bowing
  • "
    6 cafe-au-lait spots diagnostic
  • "
    NF1 is a tumor suppressor

Dystrophic Scoliosis

Dystrophic scoliosis in NF1 has a POOR prognosis.

  • Features: Short segment, sharp angular curve, vertebral scalloping, rib penciling, dural ectasia.
  • Progresses rapidly, even after fusion.
  • Early combined (anterior + posterior) fusion may be needed.
  • Monitor closely.

Dystrophic vs Non-Dystrophic Scoliosis

FeatureDystrophicNon-Dystrophic
Short, sharp, angularSimilar to idiopathic
Scalloping, wedging, rotationMinimal
Poor - rapid progressionBetter - like idiopathic
Early combined fusionStandard scoliosis Rx
Mnemonic

NF1 Diagnostic Criteria

C
Cafe-au-lait
≥6 spots ≥5mm
F
Freckling
Axillary or inguinal
N
Neurofibromas
≥2 or 1 plexiform
O
Optic Glioma
Tumor
L
Lisch Nodules
Iris hamartomas
B
Bony
Dysplasia (sphenoid, tibia)
R
Relative
First-degree with NF1

Memory Hook:CFNOLBR - 2 or more criteria.

Mnemonic

Dystrophic Scoliosis Features

S
Sharp Curve
Short segment, angular
S
Scalloping
Vertebral body
R
Rib Penciling
Thin ribs
D
Dural Ectasia
Expanded dural sac

Memory Hook:SSRD - Sharp, Scalloping, Rib, Dural.

Mnemonic

Tibial Dysplasia Management

B
Brace
Protect tibia from fracture
I
Ilizarov
For pseudarthrosis
V
Vascularized Fibula
Graft option
A
Amputation
Last resort

Memory Hook:BIVA - Brace, Ilizarov, Vascularized graft, Amputation.

Mnemonic

HARDNF1 Surgery Challenges

H
High failure rate
Pseudarthrosis recurs, fusions fail
A
Abnormal healing
Impaired bone consolidation
R
Rapid progression
Dystrophic curves progress post-fusion
D
Difficult revision
Multiple procedures often required

Memory Hook:NF1 surgery is HARD - plan for complications and counsel families accordingly!

Overview/Epidemiology

Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) is a common genetic disorder.

  • Genetics: Autosomal dominant. NF1 gene on chromosome 17 (encodes neurofibromin, a tumor suppressor).
  • Incidence: 1 in 3,000.
  • 50% new mutations: Often no family history.
  • Key Features: Cafe-au-lait spots, neurofibromas, Lisch nodules.
  • Malignancy Risk: 8-13% lifetime risk of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST).

Anatomy and Pathomechanics

NF1 Gene Function

  • Neurofibromin is a tumor suppressor (Ras-GAP).
  • Loss leads to uncontrolled cell proliferation (neurofibromas).
  • Affects Schwann cells, melanocytes, bone.

Why Scoliosis in NF1?

  • Dystrophic features suggest mesodermal dysplasia.
  • Vertebral scalloping from dural ectasia and abnormal bone.
  • Non-dystrophic curves likely from neurofibromas affecting paraspinal muscles.

Why Tibial Pseudarthrosis?

  • Local mesodermal defect in tibial periosteum/bone.
  • Reduced blood supply and poor bone healing.
  • Anterolateral bowing progresses to fracture and non-union.

Classification Systems

Crawford Classification (Tibial Dysplasia)

  • Type I: Anterolateral bowing with increased cortical density.
  • Type II: Anterolateral bowing with sclerotic medullary canal.
  • Type III: Anterolateral bowing with cystic lesion.
  • Type IV: Anterolateral bowing with frank fracture/pseudarthrosis.

Prognosis: Types III and IV have worst outcomes.

NF1 Scoliosis Classification

Dystrophic (worse prognosis):

  • Short segment, sharp curve.
  • Vertebral scalloping.
  • Rib penciling (thin ribs).
  • Spindling of transverse processes.
  • Dural ectasia.

Non-Dystrophic (better prognosis):

  • Similar to idiopathic scoliosis.
  • No vertebral abnormalities.

Clinical Assessment

NIH Diagnostic Criteria (≥2):

  1. ≥6 cafe-au-lait spots (≥5mm prepubertal, ≥15mm postpubertal).
  2. ≥2 neurofibromas or 1 plexiform neurofibroma.
  3. Freckling in axillary or inguinal region.
  4. Optic glioma.
  5. ≥2 Lisch nodules.
  6. Bony lesion (sphenoid dysplasia, tibial dysplasia).
  7. First-degree relative with NF1.

Physical Exam:

  1. Skin: Cafe-au-lait spots, neurofibromas, freckling.
  2. Spine: Scoliosis assessment.
  3. Lower Limbs: Tibial bowing.
  4. Eyes: Slit lamp for Lisch nodules.

Investigations

Genetic Testing:

  • NF1 mutation testing (available but not always needed for clinical diagnosis).

Imaging:

  • Spine X-ray: Scoliosis, vertebral changes.
  • MRI Spine: Pre-op for scoliosis (dural ectasia, intraspinal neurofibromas).
  • Lower Limb X-ray: Tibial bowing.
  • MRI Brain: Optic pathway glioma screening.

Ophthalmology:

  • Slit lamp for Lisch nodules.

Management Algorithm

Dystrophic Scoliosis

  • Bracing: Limited effect.
  • Surgery: Early combined (anterior + posterior) fusion for curves greater than 20-25 degrees because of rapid progression.
  • Pre-op MRI: Exclude intraspinal pathology (dural ectasia, neurofibromas).

Non-Dystrophic Scoliosis

  • Manage like idiopathic scoliosis.
  • Bracing for curves 25-40 degrees.
  • Surgery for curves greater than 40-50 degrees.
  • Better prognosis.

Tibial Dysplasia (Congenital Pseudarthrosis)

  • Anterolateral bowing in infancy → high risk of fracture and pseudarthrosis.
  • Bracing: To prevent fracture.
  • Surgery if fractures/pseudarthrosis: Ilizarov, vascularized fibula graft, bone morphogenetic protein.
  • Amputation: May be needed if multiple failures.
📊 Management Algorithm
Management Algorithm
Click to expand
Treatment decision pathway for NF1 orthopaedic management.

Surgical Techniques

Combined Anterior-Posterior Fusion

Indications: Dystrophic scoliosis with curves greater than 20-25 degrees.

Technique:

  • Anterior release and fusion.
  • Posterior instrumented fusion.
  • Address dural ectasia intra-op.

Challenges: High pseudarthrosis rate, dural ectasia, thin pedicles.

Pseudarthrosis Treatment

Ilizarov Technique:

  • External fixation.
  • Compression at pseudarthrosis site.
  • May include bone transport.

Vascularized Fibula Graft:

  • From contralateral leg.
  • Good blood supply for healing.

Adjuncts: BMP, bone grafting.

Complications

ComplicationContextManagement
Pseudarthrosis (Spine)Post-scoliosis surgeryCombined fusion, revision
Pseudarthrosis (Tibia)Multiple surgeriesIlizarov, amputation if fails
Curve ProgressionDespite fusionRevision, extend fusion
MPNSTPlexiform neurofibromaOncology, wide excision
Dural TearScoliosis surgeryPrimary repair

Postoperative Care

  • Scoliosis: Bracing post-op, close follow-up for pseudarthrosis.
  • Tibial Surgery: Protected weight-bearing, external fixator care.
  • All Patients: Long-term surveillance for malignancy.

Outcomes/Prognosis

  • Dystrophic Scoliosis: Challenging. High failure rate even with combined fusion.
  • Tibial Pseudarthrosis: Healing is difficult. Multiple surgeries often needed.
  • Life Expectancy: Reduced due to malignant transformation (MPNST), other complications.

Evidence Base

Level IV
📚 Crawford and Bagamery
Key Findings:
  • Classification of tibial dysplasia
  • Anterolateral bowing types
  • Prognosis by type
Clinical Implication: Classification guides prognosis.
Source: J Pediatr Orthop 1986

Level IV
📚 Durrani et al
Key Findings:
  • Modulation of dystrophic scoliosis
  • Combined fusion recommended
  • High pseudarthrosis rate
Clinical Implication: Combined fusion for dystrophic curves.
Source: Spine 2000

Level IV
📚 Parada et al
Key Findings:
  • Tibial pseudarthrosis outcomes
  • Ilizarov success 65-80%
  • Multiple surgeries common
Clinical Implication: Counsel about multiple surgeries.
Source: J Pediatr Orthop 2019

Guideline
📚 Ferner et al
Key Findings:
  • NF1 diagnostic guidelines
  • NIH criteria
  • Surveillance recommendations
Clinical Implication: Follow NIH diagnostic criteria.
Source: J Med Genet 2007

Level IV
📚 Akbarnia et al
Key Findings:
  • Growing rod techniques in NF1
  • Early surgery for dystrophic curves
  • Growth preservation attempts
Clinical Implication: Consider growth-preserving options in young children.
Source: Spine 2005

Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Dystrophic Scoliosis

EXAMINER

"12-year-old with NF1 has a 30-degree thoracic curve with vertebral scalloping and rib penciling on X-ray."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This is **dystrophic scoliosis** (short, sharp curve with vertebral changes). It has a **poor prognosis** and progresses rapidly. I would obtain an **MRI** to exclude intraspinal pathology. Given the dystrophic features, I would recommend **early combined anterior-posterior fusion** rather than waiting. Bracing is unlikely to prevent progression. Counsel the family about high pseudarthrosis rate.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Dystrophic features = poor prognosis
Early combined fusion
MRI pre-op
COMMON TRAPS
✗Treating like idiopathic scoliosis
✗Delaying surgery
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are dystrophic features?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Tibial Bowing

EXAMINER

"6-month-old with NF1. X-ray shows anterolateral bowing of the tibia."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This is **tibial dysplasia** associated with NF1. Anterolateral bowing carries a high risk of **fracture and pseudarthrosis**. Management: **Bracing** (clamshell KAFO) to protect the tibia from fracture. If fracture occurs, healing is very difficult. Surgical options include **Ilizarov fixation, vascularized fibula graft**, with/without bone morphogenetic protein. Amputation may be needed for refractory cases.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Anterolateral bowing = high fracture risk
Brace to protect
Pseudarthrosis is difficult to treat
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not protecting the tibia
✗Underestimating pseudarthrosis difficulty
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the Crawford classification?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

MPNST Concern

EXAMINER

"25-year-old with NF1 presents with rapid growth and pain in a previously stable plexiform neurofibroma on the thigh."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This is concerning for **malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST)**. NF1 patients have an 8-13% lifetime risk. Red flags include rapid growth and new pain. I would obtain **MRI** (heterogeneous enhancement, necrosis) and consider **PET-CT** (increased uptake). **Biopsy** if suspicious. Treatment is **wide surgical excision** with oncology involvement. MPNST is aggressive with poor prognosis - 5-year survival is approximately 40%.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Rapid growth + pain = concerning
MRI and PET-CT
Wide excision if MPNST
COMMON TRAPS
✗Ignoring warning signs
✗Marginal excision
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the lifetime MPNST risk in NF1?"

MCQ Practice Points

Genetics MCQ

Q: What gene is mutated in NF1? A: NF1 gene on chromosome 17 (neurofibromin).

Scoliosis MCQ

Q: What type of scoliosis has a poor prognosis in NF1? A: Dystrophic scoliosis (short, sharp, angular).

Tibial MCQ

Q: What tibial deformity is associated with NF1? A: Anterolateral bowing with risk of pseudarthrosis.

Malignancy Pearl

Q: What malignancy are NF1 patients at risk for? A: MPNST (malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor) - 8-13% lifetime risk. Arises from plexiform neurofibromas.

Crawford Pearl

Q: What is the Crawford classification for? A: Tibial dysplasia in NF1. Types I-IV based on bowing characteristics and presence of fracture/pseudarthrosis.

Diagnostic Pearl

Q: What eye finding is seen in NF1? A: Lisch nodules (iris hamartomas) - seen on slit lamp exam.

Australian Context

  • Genetic Testing: NF1 mutation testing available through clinical genetics.
  • NF Australia: Patient support organization.
  • Multidisciplinary Care: Neurology, orthopaedics, ophthalmology, dermatology, oncology.
  • Surveillance: Annual clinical review, MRI for optic glioma, scoliosis screening.
  • MPNST: Refer to sarcoma MDT if suspected.

NEUROFIBROMATOSIS

High-Yield Exam Summary

GENETICS

  • •NF1 Gene
  • •Chromosome 17
  • •Autosomal Dominant
  • •Tumor suppressor

DIAGNOSIS

  • •≥6 cafe-au-lait spots
  • •Neurofibromas
  • •Lisch nodules
  • •Tibial dysplasia

SCOLIOSIS

  • •Dystrophic = poor prognosis
  • •Sharp angular curve
  • •Combined fusion
  • •Non-dystrophic = better

TIBIA

  • •Anterolateral bowing
  • •Pseudarthrosis risk
  • •Brace to protect
  • •Ilizarov if fractured

DYSTROPHIC FEATURES

  • •Vertebral scalloping
  • •Rib penciling
  • •Dural ectasia
  • •Spindling TP

MALIGNANCY

  • •MPNST 8-13% risk
  • •Arises from plexiform
  • •Rapid growth = concern
  • •Wide excision

Self-Assessment Quiz

Differential Diagnosis

Cafe-au-lait Spots and Related Conditions:

ConditionKey FeaturesDifferentiator
NF1Multiple CAL spots, neurofibromasNIH criteria, Lisch nodules
NF2Bilateral acoustic neuromasDifferent gene (NF2), no CAL spots
McCune-AlbrightCAL spots, polyostotic FDCoast-of-Maine borders, precocious puberty
Legius SyndromeCAL spots, frecklingNo neurofibromas, SPRED1 mutation
Noonan SyndromeCAL spotsShort stature, cardiac defects

Key Distinguishing Points:

  • NF1 vs NF2: NF1 has CAL spots and peripheral neurofibromas; NF2 has acoustic neuromas
  • NF1 vs McCune-Albright: NF1 has smooth-bordered CAL spots; McCune-Albright has "coast of Maine" irregular borders
  • NF1 vs Legius: Very similar but Legius lacks neurofibromas (SPRED1 mutation)

Additional Quiz Questions

Quick Stats
Reading Time42 min
Related Topics

Accessory Navicular

Achondroplasia

Arthrogryposis

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease