Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Physeal Injuries (Salter-Harris Classification)

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Physeal Injuries (Salter-Harris Classification)

A comprehensive guide to Physeal Injuries using the Salter-Harris Classification, covering anatomy, prognosis, and management principles.

complete
Updated: 2026-01-21
High Yield Overview

Physeal Injuries

The Salter-Harris Classification

15-30%Incidence of pediatric fractures
11-12yPeak Age (Boys)
Type IIMost Common
IV & VHighest Growth Arrest Risk

Salter-Harris Classification

Type I
PatternSlip through physis only.
TreatmentCasting
Type II
PatternThrough physis + Metaphysis.
TreatmentReduction + Casting
Type III
PatternThrough physis + Epiphysis (Intra-articular).
TreatmentORIF
Type IV
PatternThrough Metaphysis, Physis, Epiphysis.
TreatmentORIF
Type V
PatternCrush injury to physis.
TreatmentRetrospective diagnosis

Critical Must-Knows

  • SALTR Mnemonic: Slip, Above, Lower (Through), Ram, Ruin (Crush).
  • Type II is Most Common: Fracture through physis with metaphyseal fragment (Thurston-Holland).
  • Type III/IV are Intra-Articular: Require anatomical reduction.
  • Type V is a Crush Injury: Often diagnosed retrospectively by growth arrest.
  • Distal Femur is High Risk: Accounts for 60-70% of leg length discrepancy from growth arrest.

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Know the Salter-Harris classification perfectly
  • "
    Understand which types require ORIF
  • "
    Know the high-risk physes (Distal Femur, Proximal Tibia)
  • "
    Recognize growth arrest patterns (Bar, Complete)

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

AP pelvis X-ray showing displaced transphyseal femoral neck fracture in 20-month-old child
Click to expand
AP pelvis X-ray showing displaced transphyseal femoral neck fracture in 20-month-old childCredit: Brown MJ et al. via Open Orthop J via Open-i (NIH) - PMC4897027 (CC-BY)
AP and lateral X-rays showing Peterson Type I physeal injury of distal forearm
Click to expand
AP and lateral X-rays showing Peterson Type I physeal injury of distal forearmCredit: J AS et al. via J Orthop Case Rep via Open-i (NIH) - PMC4719264 (CC-BY)

The Distal Femoral Physis

The Distal Femoral Physis is HIGH RISK.

  • It contributes 70% of femoral length and 35% of total leg length.
  • Even minor physeal damage can cause significant leg length discrepancy.
  • Angular deformity (varus/valgus) is also common.
  • Any Salter-Harris injury to the distal femur should be treated with respect and followed long-term for growth disturbance.

Salter-Harris Types at a Glance

TypeFracture LinePrognosisTreatment
Physis onlyGoodCasting
Physis + MetaphysisGoodReduction + Casting
Physis + EpiphysisFair (intra-articular)ORIF
All three layersPoor (high arrest risk)ORIF
Crush injuryVery Poor (often missed)Monitor for arrest
Mnemonic

SALTR Mnemonic

S
Slip
Type I - Slip through physis
A
Above
Type II - Above (Metaphysis) involved
L
Lower
Type III - Lower (Epiphysis) involved
T
Through
Type IV - Through all layers
R
Ruin/Ram
Type V - Crush (Ruin the physis)

Memory Hook:SALTR - The classic mnemonic.

Mnemonic

High-Risk Physes

D
Distal Femur
70% of femoral growth
P
Proximal Tibia
High arrest risk
D
Distal Tibia
Tillaux/Triplane common
D
Distal Radius
Very common, usually benign

Memory Hook:DPD - Distal Femur is Priority, but Distal Tibia is tricky.

Mnemonic

Factors Affecting Prognosis

A
Age
Younger = more growth remaining = more consequence
S
Site
Distal Femur is worst
T
Type
Type IV/V are worst
R
Reduction
Quality of reduction matters

Memory Hook:ASTR - Assess these factors for prognosis.

Overview/Epidemiology

Physeal Injuries are fractures involving the growth plate (physis).

  • Epidemiology:
    • Account for 15-30% of all pediatric fractures.
    • Boys are more commonly affected (2:1).
    • Peak incidence during the adolescent growth spurt ("closing physes are vulnerable physes").
  • Anatomical Weakness:
    • The physis is weaker than bone, ligaments, and tendons in children.
    • In adults, the same mechanism would cause a ligament sprain or dislocation.
    • In children, it causes a physeal fracture.

Anatomy and Pathomechanics

Physeal Anatomy The physis has distinct zones (from epiphysis to metaphysis):

  1. Reserve Zone (Resting Zone): Storage of nutrients. Germinal cells.
  2. Proliferative Zone: Chondrocyte replication (columns of cells).
  3. Hypertrophic Zone: Chondrocyte enlargement. Weakest zone - fractures propagate here.
  4. Zone of Provisional Calcification: Chondrocytes undergo apoptosis, matrix calcifies.
  5. Primary Spongiosa: New woven bone formation.

Fracture Propagation

  • Fractures typically propagate through the hypertrophic zone (Type I, II).
  • This zone is weak because the chondrocytes are dying, and the matrix is transitioning.
  • The germinal cells (Reserve and Proliferative zones) are typically preserved, allowing continued growth.
  • In Type III, IV, and V injuries, the germinal layers are disrupted, leading to growth arrest.

Ring of LaCroix and Perichondral Ring

  • These structures provide peripheral stability to the physis.
  • Injury to these (e.g., in severe Type I) can contribute to instability and arrest.

Classification Systems

Salter-Harris Classification (1963)

The gold standard.

Type I: Fracture through the physis only. No metaphyseal or epiphyseal fragment. Often occult on X-ray (diagnosed by point tenderness over the physis).

Type II: Fracture through the physis with extension into the metaphysis. The metaphyseal fragment is called the Thurston-Holland fragment. Most common (75%).

Type III: Fracture through the physis with extension into the epiphysis. Intra-articular. Requires anatomical reduction.

Type IV: Fracture crosses all three layers (metaphysis, physis, epiphysis). Highest risk of growth arrest. Requires ORIF.

Type V: Crush injury to the physis. Often missed on initial X-rays. Diagnosed retrospectively when growth arrest is identified.

Peterson Classification (Additions)

  • Type VI: Injury to the peripheral perichondral ring (e.g., lawnmower injury). High risk of peripheral physeal bar.

Ogden Classification

  • Expands on Salter-Harris with subtypes (A, B, C) based on location and comminution.
  • Less commonly used clinically.

Clinical Assessment

History:

  • Mechanism: Fall? Twisting? Direct blow?
  • Location of Pain: Point tenderness over the physis is the key finding.
  • Swelling: May be minimal in Type I.

Physical Exam:

  1. Inspection: Swelling, deformity, ecchymosis.
  2. Palpation: Point tenderness over the physis = physeal injury until proven otherwise (even if X-ray is negative).
  3. ROM: May be limited by pain.
  4. Neurovascular: Document status (especially for displaced fractures).

Investigations

Imaging:

  • X-ray (AP and Lateral): Standard. May be normal in Type I or V.
  • Comparison Views: Of the contralateral (uninjured) side can be helpful for subtle widening.
  • MRI: If X-ray is negative but clinical suspicion is high. Shows physeal edema.
Transphyseal femoral neck fracture in a pediatric patient demonstrating Salter-Harris Type I pattern
Click to expand
AP pelvis X-ray showing displaced transphyseal femoral neck fracture (red arrow) in a 20-month-old child - a Type I equivalent injury where the fracture line passes directly through the physis without metaphyseal or epiphyseal extension.Credit: Brown MJ et al. via Open Orthop J (CC BY)
Peterson Type I physeal injury of the distal forearm
Click to expand
AP and lateral X-rays of a pediatric distal forearm showing Peterson Type I injury pattern - a physeal fracture with longitudinal extension into the metaphysis. The injury pattern demonstrates how physeal fractures can present with metaphyseal involvement.Credit: J AS et al. via J Orthop Case Rep (CC BY)

CT Scan:

  • Useful for complex intra-articular fractures (Type III, IV) to map the fracture and plan surgery.
  • 3D reconstruction is helpful.

Management Algorithm

Type I and II (Extra-Articular)

  • Closed Reduction and Casting is the mainstay.
  • Gentle manipulation. Avoid repeated reduction attempts (damages physis).
  • If stable: Cast immobilization.
  • If unstable after reduction: Consider percutaneous pinning (smooth K-wires that do not cross the physis).
  • Do NOT cross the physis with threaded hardware (exception: very localized Type IV with screw well away from the rest of the physis).

Type III and IV (Intra-Articular)

  • Anatomical Reduction is CRITICAL.
  • Greater than 2mm of articular step-off is unacceptable.
  • ORIF with smooth pins or screws placed parallel to (not across) the physis, or through the epiphysis only.
  • Avoid multiple passes through the physis.

Type V (Crush)

  • Often diagnosed retrospectively.
  • If suspected acutely: Immobilize and follow closely.
  • Long-term surveillance for growth arrest.
Clinical Algorithm
Loading flowchart...

Surgical Techniques

Percutaneous K-Wire Fixation

Indications: Unstable Type I/II after reduction, or Type III/IV after open reduction.

Technique: Closed or open reduction under fluoroscopic guidance. Pass smooth K-wires, avoiding crossing the physis if possible. For Type III/IV, place pins through the epiphysis, parallel to the physis. Bury or leave percutaneous. Immobilize in cast and remove pins at 3-4 weeks.

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF)

Indications: Type III/IV with greater than 2mm displacement.

Technique: Approach based on location (e.g., anterolateral for distal tibia). Visualize the articular surface. Reduce the epiphyseal fragment anatomically. Fix with cannulated screws (placed within the epiphysis, parallel to joint) or smooth K-wires. Avoid crossing the central physis with threaded screws.

Key Technical Points When performing ORIF for physeal injuries, the surgeon must balance the need for rigid fixation against the risk of iatrogenic physeal damage. The following principles guide technique selection:

  • Use the smallest effective implants.
  • Place hardware parallel to the physis when possible.
  • If screws must cross the physis, use small diameter (less than 4.0mm) and remove early.
  • Minimize soft tissue stripping to preserve blood supply.

Reduction Maneuvers by Type

  • Type I: Gentle traction and reduction. Avoid aggressive manipulation.
  • Type II: Reverse the mechanism (e.g., apex posterior = flex and apply posterior force). Use the Thurston-Holland fragment as a guide.
  • Type III/IV: Open reduction to visualize the articular surface. The physis cannot be adequately assessed closed.

Postoperative Immobilization

  • Long leg cast for lower limb physeal injuries.
  • Above elbow cast for upper limb physeal injuries.
  • Duration: 4-6 weeks for most injuries, longer for distal femur.

Deep Dive: Hardware and the Physis

Can you cross the physis with hardware?

  • Smooth K-wires: Yes. They cause minimal localized damage. Remove early (3-4 weeks).
  • Threaded screws: Avoid if possible. They create a "tether" that can cause asymmetric growth (angular deformity).
  • Exception: In Type IV fractures, a single 4.0mm screw placed perpendicular to the fracture line (crossing the physis) may be acceptable if placed centrally and only one or two small holes are made. The risk is lower than leaving a malreduced fracture.

Key Principle The bigger the physis (younger the child, more growth remaining), the more cautious you must be about crossing it.

Complications

ComplicationRatePrevention/Management
Growth ArrestVariable (1-10% Type II, up to 50% Type IV)Anatomical reduction. Avoid physis damage.
Angular DeformityCommon with partial arrestBar excision if less than 50% physis affected, osteotomy if complete.
Leg Length DiscrepancyDepends on site and ageEpiphysiodesis or lengthening depending on discrepancy.
Avascular NecrosisRare (except specific sites like femoral head)Gentle reduction. Minimize soft tissue stripping.
NonunionVery RareGood blood supply in children.

Postoperative Care

  • Immobilization: Cast or splint for 3-6 weeks depending on location.
  • Weight Bearing: Usually non-weight bearing initially for lower limb injuries.
  • Follow-up: X-rays at 1-2 weeks to confirm alignment, then at 6-12 months to screen for growth disturbance.
  • Long-Term Surveillance: Any patient with a SH III, IV, or high-risk location (distal femur) should be followed for at least 1 year for growth arrest.

Outcomes/Prognosis

  • Type I/II: Generally excellent. Growth arrest is rare (less than 2% for Type II).
  • Type III/IV: Fair to poor if malreduced. Good if anatomically reduced. Arrest rate 10-50%.
  • Type V: Poor. Often missed initially. Growth arrest is common.
  • Site Matters: Distal femur has the worst outcomes regardless of type.

Evidence Base

Classic
📚 Salter and Harris
Key Findings:
  • Original description of the classification
  • Based on mechanism and prognosis
  • Type I/II have better prognosis than III/IV/V
Clinical Implication: The foundation of physeal injury management.
Source: JBJS Am 1963

Level IV
📚 Peterson
Key Findings:
  • Added Type VI (injury to perichondral ring)
  • Peripheral injuries have high arrest risk
  • Lawnmower injuries are classic
Clinical Implication: Consider peripheral ring damage.
Source: J Pediatr Orthop 1994

Level IV
📚 Barmada et al
Key Findings:
  • Risk factors for growth arrest after distal tibial physeal fractures
  • Greater displacement = greater arrest risk
  • Type III/IV are higher risk
Clinical Implication: Anatomical reduction reduces arrest risk.
Source: J Pediatr Orthop 2003

Level IV
📚 Ecklund and Jaramillo
Key Findings:
  • MRI can detect physeal injuries when X-ray is negative
  • MRI shows physeal bar formation early
  • Useful for Type I and V fractures
Clinical Implication: MRI is valuable for occult injuries.
Source: RadioGraphics 2002

Classic
📚 Langenskiold
Key Findings:
  • Described physeal bar excision and interposition
  • Effective if bar is less than 50% of physis
  • Requires at least 2 years of growth remaining
Clinical Implication: Bar excision can restore growth.
Source: Clin Orthop 1981

Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

The Limping Child with a Normal X-ray

EXAMINER

"9-year-old with ankle pain after a twisting injury. X-ray is normal. Point tenderness over the distal fibular physis."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This is a **Salter-Harris Type I fracture** of the distal fibula (analogous to a lateral ankle sprain in adults). Even though the X-ray is normal, point tenderness over the physis is diagnostic. Management: **Below-knee cast or walking boot** for 3-4 weeks. Prognosis is excellent. No specific follow-up for growth arrest is needed for this location.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Type I can be X-ray negative
Point tenderness is the key
Treat with immobilization
COMMON TRAPS
✗Discharging without immobilization
✗Ordering unnecessary MRI for a simple Type I fibula
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Would you manage the distal femur the same way?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

The Displaced Type IV Distal Tibia

EXAMINER

"12-year-old with a Salter-Harris Type IV fracture of the distal tibia. 3mm of articular step-off on CT."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This is **unacceptable**. Type IV fractures are intra-articular, and greater than 2mm of step-off leads to both joint incongruity (arthritis) and high risk of growth arrest. This requires **ORIF**. I would perform anatomical reduction via an appropriate approach (anterolateral or anteromedial), visualize the articular surface, reduce, and fix with screws placed within the epiphysis (parallel to the physis). This patient needs long-term follow-up for growth disturbance.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Anatomical reduction is mandatory
Greater than 2mm step-off is unacceptable
ORIF with epiphyseal screws
COMMON TRAPS
✗Accepting non-anatomical reduction
✗Crossing the physis with a large screw unnecessarily
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you fix this fracture?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Growth Arrest After a Distal Femur Fracture

EXAMINER

"8-year-old presents 1 year after a Salter-Harris II distal femur fracture. Now has 2cm of LLD and progressive valgus."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This is a **growth arrest** with a **physeal bar** causing both shortening and angular deformity. MRI will confirm the bar location and size. If the bar is less than 50% of the physis AND the child has greater than 2 years of growth remaining, **bar excision with fat or PMMA interposition** is an option. If the bar is greater than 50% or growth is nearly complete, bar excision will fail. In that case, I would perform **contralateral epiphysiodesis** (to equalize leg length) and correct the angular deformity with an **osteotomy** or **guided growth** (hemi-epiphysiodesis).

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Bar excision if less than 50%
Contralateral epiphysiodesis if bar is large
Osteotomy for angular deformity
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting bar excision on a greater than 50% bar
✗Ignoring the angular deformity
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you perform bar excision?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

The Lawnmower Injury

EXAMINER

"5-year-old with a lawnmower injury to the foot. Significant soft tissue loss over the lateral malleolus and visible physis."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This is a **Peterson Type VI** physeal injury - injury to the **perichondral ring**. This is a high-risk injury for peripheral physeal bar formation and subsequent angular deformity. Management: **I&D**, **Stabilization** (of any associated fractures), **Soft tissue coverage** (may need flap). Long-term surveillance for growth arrest is mandatory.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Type VI = Perichondral ring injury
High arrest risk
Soft tissue is the priority acutely
COMMON TRAPS
✗Ignoring the long-term growth implications
✗Underestimating soft tissue loss
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What angular deformity would you expect from a lateral fibular bar?"

MCQ Practice Points

Classification MCQ

Q: Which Salter-Harris type is most common? A: Type II (75% of physeal fractures). Fracture through physis with a metaphyseal (Thurston-Holland) fragment.

Prognosis MCQ

Q: Which Salter-Harris type has the worst prognosis for growth arrest? A: Type IV and V. Type IV crosses all layers. Type V is a crush injury.

Anatomy MCQ

Q: Which zone of the physis is the weakest? A: Hypertrophic zone. This is where Type I and II fractures propagate.

Management MCQ

Q: What is the maximum acceptable step-off for a Salter-Harris Type III or IV fracture? A: 2mm. Greater than 2mm requires ORIF.

Hardware MCQ

Q: Can threaded screws be placed across the physis? A: Avoid if possible. Threaded hardware creates a tether causing asymmetric growth. Use smooth K-wires and remove early (3-4 weeks).

Distal Femur Risk

Q: What is the significance of the distal femoral physis? A: High risk location. Contributes 70% of femoral growth and 35% of leg length. Even Type II injuries have 30-50% arrest risk.

Australian Context

  • Imaging: Low-dose EOS imaging is increasingly available for follow-up.
  • Bar Excision: Performed at major pediatric centres with fluoroscopic or navigation guidance.
  • Guided Growth: Tension band plating for angular deformity is widely used.
  • Surveillance: Children with high-risk physeal injuries should be followed for at least 1-2 years.

PHYSEAL INJURIES (SALTER-HARRIS)

High-Yield Exam Summary

CLASSIFICATION

  • •I: Physis only
  • •II: + Metaphysis (Most Common)
  • •III: + Epiphysis (Intra-art)
  • •IV: All Three (Worst)

ANATOMY

  • •Hypertrophic Zone (Weakest)
  • •Reserve Zone (Germinal)
  • •Perichondral Ring (Stability)
  • •Thurston-Holland (Type II)

HIGH RISK SITES

  • •Distal Femur (70% growth)
  • •Proximal Tibia
  • •Distal Tibia (Tillaux)
  • •Type IV Anywhere

TREATMENT

  • •I/II: Cast
  • •III/IV: ORIF (greater than 2mm)
  • •V: Monitor
  • •Avoid crossing physis

Deep Dive: Physeal Bar Excision

What is a Physeal Bar?

  • A bridge of bone that forms across the injured physis, tethering growth.
  • Can be central (causes shortening only) or peripheral (causes angular deformity).

Indications for Bar Excision

  • Bar less than 50% of physis width.
  • At least 2 years (or 2cm) of growth remaining.
  • Angular deformity that is progressive.

Technique

  1. Preoperative MRI to map the bar.
  2. Approach based on bar location.
  3. Excise the bar under fluoroscopy and direct vision.
  4. Interpose fat graft or PMMA (to prevent bar reformation).
  5. Consider concurrent osteotomy if significant angular deformity.

Outcomes

  • Restoration of growth in 50-80% of cases.
  • Better results with smaller bars and more growth remaining.

Self-Assessment Quiz

Parent's Guide: Understanding Physeal Injuries

What is a Growth Plate? A growth plate is a layer of cartilage near the end of a bone where growth occurs. Children's bones grow from these areas until they reach skeletal maturity (around age 14-16 for girls, 16-18 for boys).

What happens if the growth plate is injured? Most growth plate injuries heal completely without any problems. However, in some cases, the injury can damage the cells responsible for growth, leading to:

  • Shorter limb: If growth slows or stops.
  • Crooked limb: If one part of the growth plate is damaged but the rest keeps growing.

How is it treated?

  • Most injuries are treated with a cast.
  • Some injuries (especially those that go into the joint) may require surgery to realign the bones.

What are the warning signs? Your doctor will want to see your child for follow-up X-rays. Call them if you notice:

  • One leg looking shorter than the other.
  • A limb that seems to be growing crooked.

Long-term outlook Most children do very well. Your doctor may want to monitor your child with X-rays over the next 1-2 years to ensure the growth plate is healing normally.

Additional Evidence

Level IV
📚 Carey et al
Key Findings:
  • Risk of growth arrest with transphyseal screws
  • Small diameter screws (less than 7% of physis) are safe
  • Central placement is safer than peripheral
Clinical Implication: If you must cross, use small screws and place centrally.
Source: J Orthop Trauma 2009

Level IV
📚 Leary et al
Key Findings:
  • Complications of distal femoral physeal fractures
  • Overall complication rate 52%
  • LLD and angular deformity are common
Clinical Implication: Distal femur injuries need close follow-up.
Source: J Pediatr Orthop 2009

Rehabilitation Protocol

Phase 1: Immobilization (0-4 weeks)

  • Cast or splint immobilization.
  • Non-weight bearing for lower limb injuries.
  • Gentle ROM of uninvolved joints.

Phase 2: Early Mobilization (4-6 weeks)

  • Cast removal if healed.
  • Progressive weight bearing.
  • Gentle ROM exercises.

Phase 3: Strengthening (6-12 weeks)

  • Progressive strengthening.
  • Proprioception and balance.
  • Return to activities.

Long-Term

  • Follow-up X-rays at 6-12 months to screen for growth disturbance.

Differential Diagnosis

In a Child with Periarticular Pain and Normal X-ray:

  • Salter-Harris Type I: Point tenderness over the physis. Treat as a fracture.
  • Ligament Sprain: Rare in children (ligaments are stronger than physis).
  • Stress Fracture: Overuse history. May need MRI/bone scan.
  • Infection (Osteomyelitis/Septic Arthritis): Fever, elevated CRP.
  • Tumour: Night pain, constitutional symptoms (rare).

Additional Self-Assessment Questions

Specific Physeal Injuries by Location

Distal Radius

  • Most common pediatric physeal injury.
  • Usually Type I or II. Excellent prognosis.
  • Growth arrest is rare (less than 5%).
  • Treatment: Closed reduction and casting.

Distal Femur

  • High-risk injury. 70% of femoral growth from this physis.
  • Growth disturbance in 30-50% of cases.
  • Even Type II can lead to significant LLD or angular deformity.
  • Requires close long-term follow-up.

Proximal Tibia

  • Also high-risk. Contributes 55% of tibial growth.
  • Risk of popliteal artery injury (tethered by genicular branches).
  • Always perform thorough vascular examination.

Distal Tibia

  • Transitional fractures (Tillaux, Triplane) occur as physis is closing.
  • Type III (Tillaux) and Type IV (Triplane) are common patterns.
  • Require anatomical reduction if displaced.
Quick Stats
Reading Time66 min
Related Topics

Accessory Navicular

Achondroplasia

Arthrogryposis

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease