Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Radioulnar Synostosis

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Radioulnar Synostosis

Comprehensive guide to Congenital and Post-Traumatic Radioulnar Synostosis - Classification (Cleary & Omer), Management, and Complications

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25
High Yield Overview

RADIOULNAR SYNOSTOSIS

Fixed Pronation Deformity | Congenital vs Post-Traumatic | Cleary and Omer Classification

60%Bilateral cases
2-5yrsPresentation age
Cleary OmerClassification
Over 60°Pronation requiring surgery

CLEARY & OMER CLASSIFICATION

Type I
PatternFibrous synostosis (head reduced)
TreatmentObservation
Type II
PatternBony synostosis (head reduced)
TreatmentOsteotomy if severe
Type III
PatternBony synostosis + Posterior dislocation
TreatmentDerotation Osteotomy
Type IV
PatternBony synostosis + Anterior dislocation
TreatmentDerotation Osteotomy

Critical Must-Knows

  • Congenital failure of segmentation (longitudinal)
  • Fixed pronation deformity is classic presentation
  • Functional deficit determines treatment (eating, hygiene)
  • Derotation osteotomy is treatment of choice
  • Mobilization (excision) has high recurrence rate and is contraindicated in congenital

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Bilateral in 60% of cases
  • "
    Associated with Apert, Carpenter, Klinefelter syndromes
  • "
    Shoulder abduction compensates for pronation loss
  • "
    Look for posterior radial head dislocation (Type III)

Critical Exam Points

Functional Compensation

Patients compensate for fixed pronation with shoulder abduction and wrist hypermobility. Assess function (hand-to-mouth, keyboard use) rather than just angles.

Do Not Excise

Excision of synostosis in congenital cases has excessively high recurrence rates and poor outcomes. Do NOT offer this in the viva.

Compartment Syndrome

Derotation osteotomy carries risk of compartment syndrome and neurovascular compromise if correction is extreme (over 80°). Prophylactic fasciotomy may be indicated.

Bilateral Differences

In bilateral cases, fix dominant arm in less pronation (10-20°) for writing/eating, and non-dominant in neutral/slight supination for hygiene.

At a Glance: Quick Decision Guide

ConditionKey FeatureManagement
Mild Deformity (under 60° pronation)Functional adaptationObservation
Severe Deformity (over 60° pronation)Difficulty eating/typingDerotation Osteotomy
Post-Traumatic SynostosisAcquired stiffnessExcision (once 'cold')
Type III SynostosisPosterior head dislocationOsteotomy (Avoid head reduction)
Mnemonic

HEAD P-ACleary and Omer Classification

I
Intact (reduced)
fibrous union
II
Intact (reduced)
bony union
III
Posterior
head dislocation
IV
Anterior
head dislocation

Memory Hook:Think of the Radial Head Position: Reduced to Reduced to Posterior to Anterior

Mnemonic

NO CUTContraindications to Excision

N
Nerve
Risk of PIN injury
O
Outcome poor
High recurrence
C
Congenital
Soft tissues foreshortened
U
Unstable
Joint instability if excised
T
Tight
Interosseous membrane contracted

Memory Hook:NO CUT - Do not excise congenital synostosis!

Mnemonic

BADIndications for Surgery

B
Bilateral
Severe limitation if both arms fixed
A
Angle
Pronation over 60 degrees
D
Deficit
Functional deficit (eating/hygiene)

Memory Hook:Surgery is BAD - Bilateral, Angle, Deficit!

Overview and Epidemiology

Pathophysiology

  • Failure of Segmentation: Radius and ulna share a continued cartilaginous anlage (perichondrium).
  • Longitudinal Separation: Normally occurs from distal to proximal during weeks 5-8 of gestation.
  • Arrest: Failure of proximal separation results in synostosis.
  • Genetic: Associated with FGFR2 mutations (Apert), HOXD13 (Polysyndactyly).

Syndromic Associations

  • Apert Syndrome (Acrocephalosyndactyly)
  • Carpenter Syndrome
  • Klinefelter Syndrome (XXY)
  • Fetal Alcohol Syndrome
  • Arthrogryposis
  • Holt-Oram Syndrome

Always examine the whole patient (hips, heart, kidneys).

Anatomy

Anatomical Defects

  • Radius: Often larger, bowed, and longer than normal.
  • Radial Head: May be absent, hypoplastic, or dislocated (Posterior > Anterior).
  • Muscles: Supinators may be absent or fibrotic. Pronator teres often shortened/fibrotic.
  • Neurovascular: PIN position may be aberrant.

Functional Impact

  • Normal Rotation: 100° Supination, 80° Pronation.
  • Compensation:
    • Shoulder abduction compensates for lack of pronation.
    • Shoulder adduction increases reach.
  • Functional Arc: Most ADLs require 50° supination to 50° pronation.
  • The "Back of Hand" Sign: Patients attempting to eat bring the dorsum of hand to mouth due to fixed pronation. This is a classic exam finding.
  • Hygiene: Wiping requires supination. Fixed pronation (over 60 degrees) makes this impossible with the affected hand.

Pathophysiology

Embryological Development

Radioulnar synostosis occurs due to failure of longitudinal segmentation of the cartilaginous anlage:

Normal Development:

  • Week 5-7 gestation: Common cartilaginous mass differentiates into radius and ulna
  • Segmentation begins proximally and proceeds distally
  • Interzone apoptosis separates the two bones
  • Complete separation by week 8

Pathological Process:

  • Congenital: Failure of interzone formation → bones remain fused
  • Post-traumatic: Bone bridging across the interosseous space after fracture healing

Molecular Mechanisms

Congenital Synostosis

HOX gene abnormalitiesDefective apoptotic signalingFailure of cartilage anlage separationOften associated with other anomalies

Post-Traumatic Synostosis

Heterotopic ossification in interosseous membranePeriosteal stripping at surgeryHematoma in interosseous spaceDelayed mobilization after fracture

Risk Factors for Post-Traumatic Synostosis

  • Monteggia fractures - Highest risk
  • Both-bone forearm fractures - Especially same-level fractures
  • High-energy trauma - Extensive soft tissue injury
  • Delayed surgery - More periosteal reaction
  • Open approach to both bones through same incision
  • Bone grafting - Graft material in interosseous space
  • Head injury patients - Increased heterotopic ossification risk

Classification

Cleary & Omer Classification

Based on radiographic appearance and radial head position.

Cleary and Omer Classification

TypeDescriptionHead Position
Type IFibrous synostosis (no bone bridge)Reduced
Type IIBony synostosisReduced
Type IIIBony synostosisPosterior Dislocation
Type IVBony synostosisAnterior Dislocation

Type III is the most common pattern.

History

Clinical Presentation

  • Age: Usually noted at 2-5 years when complex hand tasks accumulate.
  • Complaint: "Difficulty holding soup bowl" (supination deficit) or "awkward running style".
  • Pain: Unusual. Pain suggests radial head instability or post-traumatic etiology.
  • Function: Difficulty typing, using cutlery, hygiene (wiping requires supination).

Examination

Physical Exam

  • Forearm Position: Usually fixed in 15-60° of pronation.
  • ROM: Block to rotation. Assess elbow flexion/extension (often normal).
  • Compensatory Motion: Assess shoulder ROM. High demand on shoulder rotation.
  • Radial Head: Palpate for dislocation (posterior prominence).
  • Neurology: Rule out associated neurological conditions.

Investigations

  • X-ray: PA and Lateral extended forearm.

    • Proximal radius/ulna fusion.
    • Radial head position (Types III/IV).
    • Radial bowing.
  • CT: Rarely needed for diagnosis but useful for surgical planning (osteotomy site).

  • MRI: Identifying fibrous band in Type I (rarely indicated).

Management

Treatment Approach

  • Mild (under 30-60° pronation): Observation. OT for adaptive strategies.
  • Severe (over 60° pronation): Surgical correction.
  • Functional deficit: Indication for surgery regardless of angle.
📊 Management Algorithm
Radioulnar synostosis treatment algorithm
Click to expand
Treatment decision pathway for radioulnar synostosis based on severity of fixed pronation and functional deficit.Credit: OrthoVellum

Target Position for Fixation

The ideal position depends on unliaterality vs bilaterality:

Target Correction Angles

ScenarioTarget PositionRationale
Unilateral10-20° SupinationMaximal function
Bilateral (Dominant)10-20° PronationWriting, Eating, Keyboard
Bilateral (Non-Dominant)Neutral to 10-20° SupinationPerineal hygiene, Hair

Surgical Technique

Derotation Osteotomy

The Gold Standard for congenital synostosis.

Surgical Steps

Step 1Approach

Distal or mid-shaft approach. Proximal approach (at synostosis) is dangerous due to neurovascular structures. Osteotomy is performed distal to the synostosis.

Step 2Osteotomy

Transverse or Z-osteotomy through radius and ulna (if fused distally) or just radius/ulna individually if synostosis is proximal. Subperiosteal dissection is critical to protect soft tissues.

Step 3Correction

Rotate forearm to desired position (e.g., 10° supination). Watch pulse/perfusion. The soft tissues (IM membrane) will be tight. Ensure no tension on the skin closure.

Step 4Fixation

Types:

  1. K-wires: Percutaneous, easier removal. Crossed K-wires are standard.
  2. Plate/Screw: More stable, requires removal in kids. 2.7mm or 3.5mm LC-DCP.
  3. Cast: Long arm cast required. Meticulous molding is essential to hold rotation.
Step 5Closure

Check compartment pressure. If tight, consider leaving deep fascia open or performing fasciotomy. Skin should be closed without tension.

Compartment Syndrome Risk

Correction of severe deformity (over 80°) tightens the interosseous membrane and vessels. High risk of compartment syndrome/Volkmann's ischemia. Consider staged correction or prophylactic fasciotomy for severe angles.

Excision (Mobilization)

  • Congenital: Generally CONTRAINDICATED. Recurrence rate greater than 90% even with interposition (fat/muscle/synthetic).
  • Post-Traumatic: May be considered if synostosis is discrete and mature ("cold" on bone scan).

Complications

  • Recurrence (Loss of Correction):

    • Excision: Recurrence rates are greater than 90% and osteotomy is preferred.
    • Derotation Osteotomy: Re-ankylosis in the new position is the goal, but loss of rotational correction can occur if fixation is inadequate or removed early.
    • Non-union: Rare at osteotomy site due to robust periosteum in children.
  • Compartment Syndrome (Volkmann's Ischemia):

    • Mechanism: Severe derotation (over 60-80°) wrings out the interosseous membrane and vessels.
    • Prevention: Prophylactic fasciotomy or staged correction.
    • Monitoring: Vigilant post-operative checks. Low threshold for splitting casts.
  • Neurovascular Injury:

    • Posterior Interosseous Nerve (PIN): Anatomy is distorted. The nerve may run adjacent to or through the synostosis mass. Distal osteotomy avoids this zone.
    • Radial Artery: Kinking can occur. Radial pulse must be documented pre- and post-correction.
    • Median Nerve: Can be compressed under the pronator teres during pronation-to-supination correction.
  • Cosmetic:

    • "Back of Hand": Fixed pronation leads to unsightly eating mechanics.
    • Scars: Forearm scars can hypertrophy.

Postoperative Care

  • Immobilization: Long arm cast for 6-8 weeks until bony union.
  • Monitoring: Overnight admission for compartment checks mandatory.
  • Follow-up: Check union. Hardware removal often required.

Outcomes

  • Functional: Excellent improvement in ADLs (eating, hygiene). Most parents report high satisfaction with the functional gains.
  • Cosmetic: Improved. The "awkward" arm position while running or at rest is resolved.
  • ROM: Rotation is NOT restored (it is a fusion in a better position). Patients adapt well using shoulder motion.
  • Satisfaction: Generally high if target angles are met. Bilateral severe cases derive the most benefit.
  • Long-term: No long-term data suggests increased risk of elbow or wrist arthritis, as the articular surfaces are generally spared (unless Type IV/anterior dislocation).

Evidence

Cleary and Omer Classification

Level IV
Cleary JE, Omer GE • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1985)
Key Findings:
  • Original description of 4 types.
  • Type III (Posterior dislocation) most common.
  • Derotation osteotomy recommended for functional deficit.
Clinical Implication: Foundation of modern classification and treatment.

Outcomes of Osteotomy

Level IV
Ramachandran et al • J Pediatr Orthop (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Review of osteotomy outcomes.
  • High satisfaction rates.
  • Warning on compartment syndrome risk with acute correction over 60 degrees.
Clinical Implication: Careful monitoring required for large corrections.

Bilateral Synostosis Management

Level IV
Simmons BP et al • J Hand Surg Am (1983)
Key Findings:
  • Established the functional positions for fixation.
  • Dominant arm in 10-20° pronation for writing/eating.
  • Non-dominant arm in neutral/supination for hygiene.
Clinical Implication: Guiding principle for position of arthrodesis in bilateral cases.

Free Fat Interposition to Prevent Recurrence

Level IV
Jupiter JB, Ring D • J Shoulder Elbow Surg (1998)
Key Findings:
  • Synostosis resection without interposition has high recurrence rate (30-50%)
  • Free fat interposition reduces recurrence to under 15%
  • Muscle pedicle flaps (anconeus) provide vascularized interposition
  • Silastic spacers have fallen out of favor due to complications
Clinical Implication: Always use interposition material (fat or muscle) when attempting excision

Classification-Based Treatment Approach

Level IV
Failla JM et al • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1989)
Key Findings:
  • Type I (minimal synostosis) can be excised with good results
  • Type III and IV (extensive involvement) should have rotational osteotomy
  • Functional position more important than achieving rotation
  • Children adapt well to fixed position if appropriately placed
Clinical Implication: Match treatment to synostosis type - resection for mild, osteotomy for severe

Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 4-year-old presents with bilateral fixed pronation of 90 degrees. Parents are concerned about his eating."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Assessment: Confirm diagnosis (X-ray, rule out syndromes). Assess functional limitations (eating, hygiene).

Principles: Bilateral severe deformity requires surgical correction.

Plan: Staged derotation osteotomies.

Position: Dominant arm to 10-20° pronation (eating/writing). Non-dominant to neutral/supination (hygiene). Staged to allow adaptation.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Bilateral severe deformity is a clear surgical indication
Dominant arm fixed in 10-20° pronation (eating/writing)
Non-dominant arm fixed in neutral/supination (hygiene)
Derotation osteotomy is the procedure of choice
Stage surgeries to allow adaptation between sides
COMMON TRAPS
✗Offering excision of synostosis (contraindicated in congenital)
✗Not assessing for syndromic associations
✗Operating on both sides simultaneously
✗Correcting to same position on both sides
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the Cleary-Omer classification?"
"Why is excision contraindicated?"
"What are the syndromic associations?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"Why do you not simply excise the bridge to restore motion?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Recurrence: Extremely high recurrence rate in congenital cases (over 90%) due to global failure of segmentation.

Soft Tissue: Muscles are fibrotic/absent, so restoration of active motion is unlikely even if bone is removed.

Instability: Excision can lead to gross instability of the proximal forearm.

Exception: Discrete post-traumatic synostosis in adults may be excised.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recurrence rate approaches 100% in congenital cases
Soft tissues (muscles) are foreshortened/absent
Active rotation cannot be restored even if bone removed
Instability results from excision
Post-traumatic synostosis may be excised (different pathology)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Suggesting excision as a primary option
✗Not differentiating congenital from post-traumatic
✗Thinking interposition materials prevent recurrence
✗Not knowing that muscles are absent/fibrotic
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"When might excision be appropriate?"
"What interposition materials have been tried?"
"Why are the muscles abnormal in congenital cases?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

EXAMINER

"What are the risks of performing a one-stage correction of 90 degrees?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Compartment Syndrome: The interosseous membrane is chronically shortened. Acute lengthening/twisting significantly increases compartment pressure.

Neurovascular Injury: The median nerve and radial artery are at risk of traction injury or compression.

Management: Prophylactic forearm fasciotomy is often performed for corrections exceeding 60-80 degrees, or a staged correction with an external fixator.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Compartment syndrome is the major risk
Interosseous membrane is chronically shortened
Acute correction wrings out vessels and soft tissues
Prophylactic fasciotomy for corrections over 60-80°
Consider staged correction with external fixator
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not warning about compartment syndrome risk
✗Performing large correction in single stage
✗Not monitoring compartments post-operatively
✗Forgetting that median nerve and radial artery at risk
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the safe limit for single-stage correction?"
"How would you perform staged correction?"
"What are the signs of compartment syndrome?"

MCQ Practice Points

Syndromic Associations

Q: What are the most common syndromic associations with radioulnar synostosis?

A: Apert Syndrome (Acrocephalosyndactyly) and Klinefelter Syndrome (XXY). Also Carpenter, Fetal Alcohol, and Arthrogryposis. However, most cases are isolated with no syndromic features.

Fixation Position

Q: In bilateral radioulnar synostosis, what is the ideal position for the dominant arm?

A: 10-20° pronation for the dominant arm (facilitates writing and eating). The non-dominant arm should be fixed in neutral to slight supination for perineal hygiene.

Contraindication to Excision

Q: Why is excision contraindicated in congenital radioulnar synostosis?

A: Recurrence rate approaches 100% even with interposition materials. Soft tissues are foreshortened, muscles absent/fibrotic, and active rotation cannot be restored. Derotation osteotomy is the only option.

Embryology

Q: At what gestational stage does radioulnar synostosis occur?

A: Weeks 5-8 when longitudinal segmentation of the forearm anlage occurs. Segmentation proceeds distal to proximal, so failure at the proximal end causes proximal radioulnar synostosis.

Compartment Syndrome Risk

Q: A child undergoes 80° derotation osteotomy and develops increasing pain with passive finger stretch. What is the diagnosis?

A: Compartment syndrome. Acute correction over 60-80° tightens the interosseous membrane and vessels. Prophylactic fasciotomy is recommended for large corrections.

Australian Context

  • Referral Pathways:

    • Primary Care: GP referral to Paediatric Orthopaedics usually occurs at age 3-5 when functional deficits become apparent.
    • Tertiary Centers: Cases are centralized to major children's hospitals (e.g., Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Sydney Children's Hospital Network, Queensland Children's Hospital).
    • Specialist Surgeons: Complex osteotomies (especially staged) require surgeons with specific fellowship training in paediatric upper limb reconstruction.
  • Support Services:

    • National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS): Access for children with significant functional impairment. Funding covers occupational therapy, adaptive cutlery, and writing aids.
    • School Support: Education integration support for scribing or laptop use during exams if writing speed is impaired.
  • Genetic Counseling:

    • Referral to clinical genetics (e.g., VCGS) is recommended for all cases, even if apparently isolated, to screen for X-linked conditions (Klinefelter) or subtle syndromic features (Apert, Carpenter).
    • Family screening may be indicated for autosomal dominant variants.
  • Guidelines:

    • Management follows principles from the Australian Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (APOS).
    • Alignment with POSNA (Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America) clinical practice guidelines.

Radioulnar Synostosis Cheat Sheet

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Classification (Cleary Omer)

  • •Type I: Fibrous
  • •Type II: Bony
  • •Type III: Posterior Head
  • •Type IV: Anterior Head

Treatment Angles

  • •Unilateral: 10-20 Sup
  • •Bi-Dom: 10-20 Pro
  • •Bi-NonDom: Neutral
  • •Max correction: 60-80 degrees

Buzzwords

  • •Failure of Segmentation
  • •Fixed Pronation
  • •Shoulder Abduction Compensation
  • •Compartment Syndrome

Additional Quiz Questions

Quick Stats
Reading Time65 min
Related Topics

Accessory Navicular

Achondroplasia

Arthrogryposis

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease