Bilateral absent radii | Thumbs present | Neonatal thrombocytopenia | RBM8A | Knee disease
- TAR is bilateral absent radii WITH thumbs present plus thrombocytopenia from birth; the present thumb is the examination clue.
- The thrombocytopenia is the early danger: bleeding risk, including intracranial haemorrhage, dominates infancy and must be controlled before any procedure.
- Platelet counts usually rise after the first year or two, so elective limb reconstruction is generally safer once the bleeding tendency has settled.
- Cow's milk intolerance can trigger thrombocytopenic crises, so feeding history is part of the haematology assessment.
- TAR is more than the forearm: lower-limb anomalies, especially knee dysplasia and genu varum, are common and can dominate adult function.
- TAR is autosomal recessive, usually a 1q21.1 microdeletion on one allele plus a low-expression RBM8A variant on the other, which matters for genetic counselling.
- “Thumbs present + absent radii + low platelets = TAR until proven otherwise.
- “Check the platelet count before you touch the patient; never plan surgery around the X-ray alone.
- “Fanconi anaemia and Holt-Oram usually affect the thumb; TAR characteristically spares it.
- “The bleeding settles with age; the knees often do not.
- “Ask about cow's milk: it can precipitate a platelet crisis.
- “TAR is recessive (RBM8A), unlike autosomal dominant Holt-Oram (TBX5).
The dramatic absent-radii deformity is not the immediate threat in a TAR infant. The threat is bleeding, including intracranial haemorrhage. Surgery, regional blocks, vigorous physiotherapy and even some splinting decisions must wait until the haematology is understood and controlled. Treating TAR as a pure hand problem is the classic mistake.
- High-yield answer
- A congenital syndrome of bilateral absent radii plus thrombocytopenia from birth, with the thumbs preserved.
- Why it matters
- The combination of absent radii and present thumbs is the recognisable pattern.
- High-yield answer
- Bleeding from thrombocytopenia, including intracranial haemorrhage.
- Why it matters
- It can be fatal and it controls the timing of every intervention.
- High-yield answer
- The thumbs are present despite absent radii.
- Why it matters
- Most other radial-ray conditions involve or lose the thumb.
- High-yield answer
- They are usually lowest in infancy and tend to improve through childhood.
- Why it matters
- Elective limb reconstruction becomes safer once counts have recovered.
- High-yield answer
- Lower-limb disease, especially knee dysplasia and genu varum, plus the upper-limb deformity.
- Why it matters
- Adult function and surgery often centre on the knees, not just the hands.
- High-yield answer
- Autosomal recessive; usually a 1q21.1 microdeletion plus a low-expression RBM8A variant.
- Why it matters
- It changes counselling and recurrence risk for the family.
Overview/Epidemiology
Thrombocytopenia-Absent Radius (TAR) syndrome is a rare congenital malformation syndrome. Its two defining features are bilateral absence of the radii and a low platelet count present from birth. The combination is unusual and, once seen, is hard to forget.
The feature that makes TAR an examination favourite is the thumb. In most conditions that destroy the radius, the thumb is also deficient or absent, because the radius and thumb share the same radial (preaxial) developmental column. TAR breaks that rule: the radii are gone but the thumbs remain. A child with bilateral absent radii and two present thumbs has TAR until proven otherwise.
TAR is rare. One case report quotes an approximate frequency of about 0.42 per 100,000 live births, which is a useful order-of-magnitude figure rather than a precise population rate (DOI). The condition was first described by Shaw and Oliver in 1959, with the first major patient series reported by Hall and colleagues in 1969; most later reports have been single cases or small series (DOI).
The natural history has two phases that the orthopaedic surgeon must hold in mind at once:
- Infancy is dominated by the blood. The platelet count is typically at its lowest, and bleeding, including intracranial haemorrhage, is the main cause of early death.
- Later childhood and adulthood are dominated by the skeleton. The platelet count usually improves, but the limb deformities, particularly of the knees, persist and can become the main determinant of quality of life (DOI).
Pathophysiology and Genetics
TAR is a disorder of both the megakaryocyte lineage and limb patterning, and the genetics explains why the two travel together.
The genetic basis is unusual. Affected individuals typically carry a microdeletion of chromosome 1q21.1 on one allele and a low-expression (hypomorphic) noncoding variant of the RBM8A gene on the other allele. The microdeletion alone is not sufficient to cause TAR, which is why both hits are needed and why the inheritance behaves in a recessive, compound-heterozygous way (DOI).
RBM8A encodes Y14, a core protein of the exon junction complex, which is involved in messenger RNA maturation. Reduced functional Y14 is thought to disturb the development of megakaryocytes (producing the thrombocytopenia) and of the radial limb structures, although the precise mechanism that spares the thumb is not fully understood (DOI).
- Typical lesion
- Microdeletion of chromosome 1q21.1 spanning RBM8A (a null allele).
- Consequence
- Loss of one functional copy; not sufficient alone to cause TAR.
- Typical lesion
- Low-expression noncoding RBM8A variant (commonly in the 5'UTR or intron 1).
- Consequence
- Reduces expression of the remaining copy below a critical threshold.
- Typical lesion
- Both hits together lower functional Y14 protein.
- Consequence
- Megakaryocyte and radial-limb development are impaired, producing the TAR phenotype.
The haematology is a hypomegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia: the bone marrow has reduced or immature megakaryocytes, so platelet production is low. Clinically, the count is usually lowest in infancy and tends to recover during childhood. Episodes of worsening thrombocytopenia ("platelet crises") can be precipitated by stress, infection and notably by cow's milk intolerance, which is why a feeding history is part of the haematological assessment (DOI).
The defining contradiction of TAR is that the radius is absent but the thumb is present. In a viva, state this explicitly: it is the feature that separates TAR from Fanconi anaemia and Holt-Oram syndrome, where the thumb is typically involved.
Classification and Differential Diagnosis
There is no single grading scale for TAR itself. In practice, classification means two things: placing TAR correctly within the radial-ray differential, and describing the severity of each affected region.
The exam-relevant task is to separate the radial-ray syndromes, because each carries a different systemic risk. The thumb is the most useful discriminator.
- Radius / thumb pattern
- Bilateral absent radii WITH thumbs present.
- Inheritance / gene
- Autosomal recessive; RBM8A (1q21.1).
- Key systemic clue
- Neonatal thrombocytopenia that improves with age; cow's milk intolerance.
- Radius / thumb pattern
- Radial ray and thumb hypoplasia or aplasia; short stature.
- Inheritance / gene
- Mostly autosomal recessive; FANC genes.
- Key systemic clue
- Progressive marrow failure (may be normal at birth); cancer risk.
- Radius / thumb pattern
- Radial ray with thumb anomaly (triphalangeal or absent thumb).
- Inheritance / gene
- Autosomal dominant; TBX5.
- Key systemic clue
- Congenital heart disease and conduction defects.
- Radius / thumb pattern
- Radial defect as one component; thumb may be involved.
- Inheritance / gene
- Sporadic; non-Mendelian.
- Key systemic clue
- Vertebral, anal, cardiac, tracheo-oesophageal, renal anomalies.
A common trap is to lump TAR with Holt-Oram. They are opposites in two ways: TAR keeps the thumb and is autosomal recessive; Holt-Oram involves the thumb, has heart and conduction disease, and is autosomal dominant.
Clinical Presentation
- Typical findings
- Bilateral short forearms with radially deviated hands and present thumbs; low platelets on first blood count.
- Clinical meaning
- Recognise the TAR pattern and treat the bleeding risk as the priority.
- Typical findings
- Bruising, petechiae, gastrointestinal bleeding or intracranial haemorrhage.
- Clinical meaning
- Thrombocytopenia is the main early cause of morbidity and death.
- Typical findings
- Worsening thrombocytopenia or bleeding after cow's milk exposure.
- Clinical meaning
- Cow's milk intolerance is a recognised trigger; adjust feeds and watch counts.
- Typical findings
- Bilateral radial club hands, short forearms, variable thumb function, emerging knee deformity.
- Clinical meaning
- Platelets are usually improving; functional and skeletal issues come to the front.
- Typical findings
- Established upper-limb deformity plus genu varum, knee instability or knee osteoarthritis.
- Clinical meaning
- Lower-limb disease can dominate adult function and surgical need.
Both upper limbs are involved symmetrically, so an affected child often uses adaptive grasp and compensatory shoulder and trunk movement. Because the thumbs are present, pinch potential is frequently better than in thumb-losing radial-ray conditions, which influences how aggressively the wrist needs to be repositioned.
History and Examination
The history and examination must cover the blood, the whole child and the limbs, in that order of safety.
- Ask about
- Bruising, petechiae, gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding, previous platelet transfusions.
- Why it matters
- Defines the immediate risk and the safety of any procedure.
- Ask about
- Cow's milk exposure and any relationship to bleeding or platelet drops.
- Why it matters
- Cow's milk intolerance can precipitate thrombocytopenic crises.
- Ask about
- Prenatal ultrasound findings, neonatal course, other anomalies detected.
- Why it matters
- May reveal cardiac, renal or gastrointestinal involvement.
- Ask about
- Reach, pinch, grasp, dressing, feeding, mobility and any knee symptoms.
- Why it matters
- Defines the real reconstructive goals for upper and lower limb.
- Ask about
- Consanguinity, affected relatives, prior genetic testing.
- Why it matters
- TAR is recessive, so counselling and recurrence risk differ from dominant syndromes.
- What to examine
- Bruising, petechiae, pallor, cardiac signs, abdominal findings, growth and dysmorphism.
- Decision it informs
- Identifies bleeding risk and systemic involvement.
- What to examine
- Symmetric short forearms, radial deviation, elbow motion, ulnar length and especially thumb presence and function.
- Decision it informs
- Confirms the TAR pattern and the pinch potential.
- What to examine
- Thumb size, opposition, web space and stability.
- Decision it informs
- Present thumbs change the reconstructive plan compared with thumb-absent disease.
- What to examine
- Alignment (genu varum), stability, range, patellar tracking and effusions.
- Decision it informs
- Knee dysplasia is common and may need long-term management.
- What to examine
- Hips, feet and spine.
- Decision it informs
- Hip, foot and spinal anomalies are described and affect overall function.
It is easy to spend the whole examination on the forearms. In TAR the knees often determine adult mobility, so deliberately assess alignment, stability and patellar tracking.
Investigations
Haematology
The single most important investigation is the platelet count, with a full blood count and a clear bleeding history. The thrombocytopenia is hypomegakaryocytic, and counts are typically lowest in infancy. Serial counts matter because the trend (usually improving with age) guides the safe timing of surgery.
Radiographs
Obtain radiographs of both forearms, wrists and hands, and of the knees and any symptomatic joints.
- Forearm: confirm bilateral absent radii, assess ulnar length and bowing, and document carpal and metacarpal anatomy.
- Thumb: confirm the present thumb and assess its bony anatomy and stability.
- Knee: look for the dysplastic features described in TAR, including genu varum, a concave distal femur, a convex medial tibial plateau, patellar abnormalities and signs of ligamentous (including cruciate) deficiency (DOI).
Genetic testing
Molecular confirmation requires detecting both the 1q21.1 deletion and the low-expression RBM8A variant, which historically needed several techniques. Next-generation sequencing can now detect both the copy-number change and the point variant in a single workflow, making confirmation more efficient (DOI). Genetic confirmation supports accurate counselling about recessive inheritance and recurrence risk (DOI).
The two-hit model is usually taught as "1q21.1 deletion plus one of two known low-expression RBM8A variants" — the 5'UTR rs139428292 and the intronic rs201779890. In the largest characterised cohort, only half of 26 molecularly confirmed patients carried one of those two variants. The other half carried four novel noncoding variants in the 5'UTR, the 3'UTR and introns, each shown in vitro to reduce expression or alter splicing (DOI).
So the assay matters, not just the request. A panel that genotypes the two familiar positions will miss roughly half of cases; one that sequences the whole RBM8A regulatory region will not. If the clinical picture is bilateral absent radii with present thumbs and neonatal thrombocytopenia, a negative targeted result should prompt a question about what the laboratory actually looked for, not a change of diagnosis.
This is also the honest framing for counselling: a confirmed deletion on one allele with no identified second hit is an incomplete result, not a refutation.
- What it looks for
- Severity and trend of thrombocytopenia.
- Decision it affects
- Bleeding management and the timing of any procedure.
- What it looks for
- Bilateral absent radii, ulnar length, present thumbs.
- Decision it affects
- Confirms the pattern and plans hand/wrist care.
- What it looks for
- Knee dysplasia, genu varum, patellar and ligament abnormalities.
- Decision it affects
- Plans lower-limb surveillance and surgery.
- What it looks for
- Cardiac and renal anomalies.
- Decision it affects
- Anaesthetic safety and overall medical care.
- What it looks for
- Confirms the diagnosis at molecular level.
- Decision it affects
- Genetic counselling and recurrence-risk advice.

Antenatal Diagnosis and Delivery Planning
TAR is frequently a prenatal diagnosis. The topic's presentation table opens with an "antenatal / newborn" line, the fetal specimen in the clinical image comes from a prenatal molecular-cytogenetics study, and the genetics section rests on family counselling - yet the antenatal pathway itself deserves spelling out, because getting the delivery right is part of protecting the thrombocytopenic newborn.
On second-trimester ultrasound the recognisable pattern is bilateral shortening of the forearms with the hands radially deviated but still present, and importantly the hands (and therefore the thumbs) are not absent - which raises TAR alongside the other radial-ray syndromes. The scan cannot confirm the platelet count or the genetics, so ultrasound findings prompt referral for definitive testing rather than a firm label on imaging alone.
Molecular confirmation before birth uses the same two-hit detection as postnatal diagnosis: a chromosomal microarray or copy-number assay for the 1q21.1 deletion on one allele, plus targeted testing for a low-expression RBM8A variant on the other. Next-generation sequencing can capture both the copy-number change and the noncoding variant in one workflow, which is as useful antenatally as it is postnatally (DOI). Where a previous child is affected and both parental alleles are known, testing can be directed and recurrence risk quoted precisely, because the inheritance is biallelic and recessive (DOI).
The practical payoff is delivery planning. A fetus suspected of having TAR should be delivered where paediatric haematology and neonatal care are available, with platelets on standby, because the newborn may be profoundly thrombocytopenic from the first hours of life and intracranial haemorrhage is the leading early cause of death (DOI). Traumatic instrumental delivery (and, by the same logic, any early invasive procedure) is best avoided until the platelet count and bleeding risk are known.
- What happens
- Bilateral short forearms, radially deviated hands, hands and thumbs present.
- Why it matters
- Flags a radial-ray syndrome and raises TAR; imaging alone cannot confirm it.
- What happens
- Microarray for the 1q21.1 deletion plus targeted RBM8A variant testing (single NGS workflow possible).
- Why it matters
- Confirms the two-hit diagnosis and enables precise recurrence-risk counselling.
- What happens
- Deliver where paediatric haematology and neonatal support exist, with platelets available.
- Why it matters
- The newborn may be severely thrombocytopenic from birth.
- What happens
- Avoid traumatic instrumental delivery and early invasive procedures until counts are known.
- Why it matters
- Intracranial haemorrhage is the leading early cause of death.
If asked about antenatal TAR, say that the ultrasound picture (short forearms with radially deviated but present hands) prompts molecular confirmation of the 1q21.1 deletion plus the RBM8A variant, and that the real management decision is where and how the baby is delivered so that a thrombocytopenic newborn is not left without platelet support.
Management
Management is multidisciplinary and staged. The unifying principle is that the bleeding disorder governs the timing of everything skeletal, and that both the upper and lower limbs need a plan.
- Priority
- Control thrombocytopenia and bleeding risk.
- Action
- Haematology-led platelet support, avoid trauma, manage cow's milk intolerance, treat crises.
- Priority
- Identify cardiac, renal and other anomalies.
- Action
- Echocardiogram, renal ultrasound, paediatric and genetics review.
- Priority
- Protect skin and positioning, build adaptive use.
- Action
- Splinting, stretching and hand therapy; family education.
- Priority
- Improve hand position and function once safe.
- Action
- Wrist and hand procedures planned after the bleeding tendency settles.
- Priority
- Address knee deformity over the long term.
- Action
- Surveillance, bracing, osteotomy or arthroplasty in selected cases.
The first job is to make the child safe. Severe thrombocytopenia is managed by a haematology team with platelet support as required, careful avoidance of trauma and unnecessary procedures, and attention to triggers such as infection and cow's milk intolerance. Because counts usually improve with age, the team also advises when the bleeding tendency has settled enough for elective surgery. Patient and family support networks are increasingly recognised as part of long-term care (DOI).
In a TAR viva, the safest framework for any surgical question is: control the platelets and bleeding first, screen the whole child, then operate electively once the haematology has improved. Saying this up front signals safe practice.
Perioperative Haematological Management
The viva scenarios in this topic explicitly ask "what perioperative haematological precautions would you take?", and the management framework repeatedly says to "control the platelets" and provide "platelet support as required" - but the practical answer to how you make a TAR patient safe for surgery deserves to be set out, because it is the difference between a safe and an unsafe plan.
The first principle is timing against the natural history. The thrombocytopenia is hypomegakaryocytic and is at its most dangerous in the first year of life, when severe counts and intracranial haemorrhage account for most of the early mortality; it then tends to improve through childhood so that many older children and adults have a much less severe bleeding tendency (DOI). This is exactly why elective reconstruction is pushed beyond infancy: you are not only waiting for the child to grow, you are waiting for the safest haematological window (DOI).
The second principle is that the bleeding risk must be quantified and corrected around any procedure rather than assumed to have resolved. Even in an adult, the platelet status is confirmed and haematology is involved before major elective surgery; in the reported adult knee arthroplasty this perioperative bleeding assessment was part of a safe outcome (DOI). Platelets are transfused to cover surgery and to treat active bleeding, corrected to a level judged safe for the specific procedure, and antiplatelet drugs (including NSAIDs) are avoided. Triggers that can drop the count acutely - infection and cow's milk intolerance - are looked for and treated, because operating into an unrecognised platelet crisis is unsafe.
- What to do
- Defer elective reconstruction past the high-risk infant year, into the phase where counts have recovered.
- Rationale
- Bleeding risk and mortality are concentrated in the first year of life.
- What to do
- Confirm a current platelet count and bleeding history; do not assume the thrombocytopenia has resolved.
- Rationale
- The count guides transfusion cover and the safety of the procedure.
- What to do
- Transfuse platelets to cover surgery and to treat active bleeding, to a level judged safe for the procedure.
- Rationale
- Provides intra-operative and post-operative haemostatic cover.
- What to do
- Avoid antiplatelet drugs and NSAIDs; treat infection; watch for cow's milk-related crises.
- Rationale
- These can precipitate or worsen a platelet crisis around surgery.
- What to do
- Combined haematology and anaesthetic assessment before any elective procedure.
- Rationale
- Anaesthetic and bleeding risks must be managed together.
When a viva asks for perioperative precautions in TAR, do not stop at "correct the platelets": time the surgery to the safer post-infant window, confirm a current count and bleeding history, transfuse platelets to cover the procedure, avoid antiplatelet drugs, treat triggers such as infection and cow's milk intolerance, and plan jointly with haematology and anaesthesia.
Complications
- Problems
- Bleeding, including intracranial haemorrhage; platelet crises triggered by infection or cow's milk.
- Clinical lesson
- Bleeding is the leading early cause of death; control it before anything else.
- Problems
- Congenital heart disease (including reported associations such as Tetralogy of Fallot).
- Clinical lesson
- Screen the heart; it affects anaesthetic safety and survival.
- Problems
- Persistent radial deviation, limited reach, recurrence after wrist reconstruction.
- Clinical lesson
- Counsel families that absent radii and growth make recurrence likely.
- Problems
- Progressive knee dysplasia, genu varum, instability and later osteoarthritis.
- Clinical lesson
- Knee disease can dominate adult function and may need arthroplasty.
- Problems
- Renal anomalies, gastrointestinal problems, scoliosis and described hearing loss.
- Clinical lesson
- TAR is a whole-body syndrome requiring multidisciplinary follow-up.
Intracranial haemorrhage and cardiac disorders are described as common and important causes of death in TAR, which is why early management is dominated by the blood and the heart rather than the limbs (DOI).
In infancy, the two threats that kill are intracranial haemorrhage from thrombocytopenia and associated cardiac disease. The orthopaedic deformity is rarely the acute problem.
Why It Matters
TAR is high-yield because it forces correct sequencing. The visible deformity invites you to talk about wrist reconstruction, but the safe answer always starts with the platelet count. It also tests a clean differential: the thumb tells you whether you are dealing with TAR, Fanconi anaemia, Holt-Oram syndrome or a VACTERL pattern, each of which carries a very different systemic risk.
Establish the platelet count and bleeding history. In an infant with bleeding risk, nothing elective should happen until haematology is controlled.
The present thumb. It is the key that unlocks the diagnosis and separates TAR from the thumb-losing radial-ray syndromes.
The lower limbs. Knee dysplasia and genu varum are common and may need more surgery over a lifetime than the forearms.
TAR is autosomal recessive (RBM8A), unlike autosomal dominant Holt-Oram (TBX5). The inheritance changes family counselling.
Clinical Relevance and Counselling
Counselling families should be honest about the two-phase natural history. In infancy, the message is about bleeding precautions, feeding, and avoiding unnecessary procedures. As the child grows, the message shifts to function: the thumbs are present so pinch is often possible, the hands can be helped with therapy and selected surgery, and the knees will need watching for years.
- Useful answer
- Usually the count is worst in infancy and improves as the child grows, but the early bleeding risk is real and serious.
- Why this is honest
- Reflects the typical natural history without minimising the danger.
- Useful answer
- We first make the blood safe and screen the heart and kidneys; elective hand surgery is safer once the bleeding tendency settles.
- Why this is honest
- Explains why timing is led by haematology.
- Useful answer
- Because the thumbs are present, useful pinch is often possible, and therapy plus selected surgery can improve hand position and grasp.
- Why this is honest
- Sets realistic, function-based expectations.
- Useful answer
- TAR is autosomal recessive, so recurrence risk is different from dominant syndromes; genetic counselling can give specific figures.
- Why this is honest
- Directs families to accurate, gene-based advice.
The best counselling answer recognises both phases: bleeding safety first, then a lifelong musculoskeletal plan dominated by hands in childhood and knees into adulthood.
Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice
TAR is rare, so there is no large registry or single international guideline; practice is built from case series, cohort studies and specialist genetic reviews, and is consistent worldwide because the biology is the same everywhere.
- Consensus position
- Bilateral absent radii with present thumbs plus neonatal thrombocytopenia; confirm with RBM8A / 1q21.1 testing.
- Evidence basis
- Specialist reviews and molecular cohorts.
- Consensus position
- Haematology-led bleeding control takes priority over elective limb surgery in infancy.
- Evidence basis
- Phenotype series and case reports emphasising haemorrhagic and cardiac risk.
- Consensus position
- Elective reconstruction is generally undertaken once thrombocytopenia improves with age.
- Evidence basis
- Natural-history descriptions across series.
- Consensus position
- Lifelong knee surveillance; arthroplasty is an option for adult end-stage disease.
- Evidence basis
- Phenotype cohort and an adult arthroplasty case report.
- Consensus position
- Counsel as an autosomal recessive, multisystem, lifelong condition.
- Evidence basis
- Genetic studies confirming biallelic RBM8A inheritance.
The most useful global lesson is sequencing: wherever a child with TAR is treated, safe care means controlling the blood and screening the whole child before elective skeletal surgery, then planning lifelong upper- and lower-limb follow-up.
Related pages: Radial Longitudinal Deficiency is the parent classification for the absent radius and carries the Bayne grading, centralisation and radialisation decisions in full - the crucial point being that TAR sits apart from every other radial ray anomaly because the thumbs are present, which is the single fastest bedside discriminator; Thumb Hypoplasia for the spectrum that is absent here and present in Holt-Oram, Fanconi anaemia and VACTERL, and for the Blauth grading a preserved TAR thumb should be measured against; Congenital Hand Overview for where radial deficiency sits among the limb-formation failures; Ulnar Club Hand for the mirror deformity on the postaxial border; Congenital Knee Dislocation and Congenital Lower Limb Deficiency Overview for the lower-limb involvement present in 47 percent of the Greenhalgh cohort, which is the reason this is an orthopaedic rather than purely a hand topic; Haemophilia for the parallel problem of operating on a child with a bleeding diathesis, including the principle that the haematological plan precedes the surgical one; Skeletal Dysplasias for the wider differential of a short, deformed limb with systemic features; and Syndactyly for the other congenital hand difference most often coexisting with a syndromic diagnosis.
Memory Aids
TARWhat Defines the Syndrome
Hook:TAR spells the diagnosis: low platelets, no radii, but the thumbs stay.
BLOODHaematology First
Hook:BLOOD before bone in TAR.
LIMBSLook Beyond the Forearm
Hook:LIMBS reminds you TAR is a whole-body syndrome, not a wrist.
Viva Scenarios
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A newborn has bilateral short forearms with radially deviated hands, but both thumbs are present. What is your immediate priority and your leading diagnosis?”
“The parents of a child with confirmed TAR ask when the hands can be operated on. How do you decide on timing?”
“An adult with known TAR presents with painful knee osteoarthritis and genu varum. How do you approach this?”
Define it in one line
- Bilateral absent radii + thrombocytopenia from birth + thumbs PRESENT.
- Autosomal recessive; RBM8A on chromosome 1q21.1 (two-hit model).
- Approximate frequency around 0.4 per 100,000 live births.
The discriminator
- Thumbs present = TAR (vs Fanconi and Holt-Oram, which involve the thumb).
- Holt-Oram: dominant, TBX5, heart and conduction disease.
- Fanconi: marrow failure (may be normal at birth), cancer risk, breakage testing.
Timing and safety
- Platelet count first; bleeding (intracranial haemorrhage) is the early killer.
- Cow's milk intolerance can trigger platelet crises.
- Counts usually improve with age; do elective surgery once safe.
Beyond the forearm
- Knee dysplasia and genu varum are common and progress.
- Cardiac (e.g. associations such as Tetralogy of Fallot) and renal anomalies.
- Total knee arthroplasty reported as effective in adult TAR knees.
One-line viva opener
- "Absent radii with present thumbs is TAR until proven otherwise; I would check the platelet count and bleeding risk before anything else."
Evidence Base
TAR is a multisystem syndrome, not just absent radii
- In 34 patients, all had documented thrombocytopenia and bilateral radial aplasia.
- Lower-limb anomalies were present in 47%, cow's milk intolerance in 47%, renal anomalies in 23% and cardiac anomalies in 15%.
- Additional features included scoliosis and sensorineural hearing loss, broadening the recognised phenotype beyond the forearm.