Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • For Training Programs
  • Authors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Methodology
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Lower Limb
Core
High Yield

Hip Osteoarthritis Assessment

Focused examination for hip osteoarthritis including functional assessment, severity grading, and differentiation from other causes of hip pain.

Hip Osteoarthritis Assessment

Examiner Favorite

Hip OA examination combines functional assessment with joint-specific testing. Examiners expect you to assess gait (Trendelenburg), measure ROM accurately, recognize the pattern of restriction (capsular pattern: IR > extension > abduction > flexion), and correlate findings with severity and functional impact.

Quick Reference One-Pager

Hip OA Assessment Summary

High-Yield Exam Summary

Cardinal Features

  • •Groin pain (mechanical)
  • •Stiffness (especially morning, under 30 min)
  • •Reduced ROM (capsular pattern)
  • •Trendelenburg gait
  • •Fixed flexion deformity (FFD)

ROM Pattern

  • •Capsular pattern: IR most limited first
  • •Then extension (FFD develops)
  • •Then abduction
  • •Flexion least affected initially
  • •Compare with opposite side

Functional Assessment

  • •Gait and walking distance
  • •Stairs, sitting, standing
  • •Putting on shoes/socks
  • •Getting in/out of car
  • •Night pain, rest pain

Examination Sequence

  • •Observe gait (antalgic, Trendelenburg)
  • •Assess leg length
  • •Measure ROM systematically
  • •Thomas test for FFD
  • •Neurovascular check

Clinical Presentation

History Features

Pain Pattern:

  • Groin pain (commonest site)
  • May radiate to anterior thigh, knee (referred)
  • Lateral hip (if associated trochanteric bursitis)
  • Mechanical: worse with activity, better with rest
  • Start-up pain (stiffness on rising)
  • Night pain indicates severe disease

Stiffness:

  • Morning stiffness less than 30 minutes (OA pattern)
  • Greater than 30 minutes suggests inflammatory arthritis
  • Improving with movement

Functional Impact:

  • Walking distance reducing
  • Stairs difficult (especially descending)
  • Difficulty with socks/shoes
  • Getting in/out of car
  • Sexual function may be affected

Gait Assessment

Gait Patterns in Hip OA

Antalgic Gait:

  • Short stance phase on affected side
  • Patient "gets off" the painful hip quickly
  • Indicates pain as primary driver

Trendelenburg Gait:

  • Pelvis drops on swing (unaffected) side
  • Indicates abductor weakness (gluteus medius)
  • May be due to pain inhibition or muscle wasting

Compensated Trendelenburg:

  • Trunk shifts OVER affected hip
  • Moves center of mass over hip
  • Reduces force required from abductors

Combined Pattern:

  • Most hip OA patients have both antalgic and Trendelenburg components
  • The combined pattern is diagnostic of hip pathology

Trendelenburg Test

Hip abductor function

Technique

  1. 1Patient stands facing examiner
  2. 2Ask patient to stand on one leg (affected side)
  3. 3Observe pelvis from behind for 30 seconds
  4. 4Repeat on opposite side for comparison
Positive Sign

Pelvis drops on the unsupported (swing) side

Indicates

Hip abductor weakness (gluteus medius dysfunction) - OA, post-THR, L5 weakness, DDH

Diagnostic Accuracy

Sensitivity73%

Ability to detect true positives

Specificity77%

Ability to exclude false positives

Range of Motion Assessment

Systematic ROM Testing

Capsular Pattern (OA): Internal rotation > Extension > Abduction > Flexion

This means IR is lost first and most severely, while flexion is preserved longest.

Normal Values:

  • Flexion: 120-130°
  • Extension: 10-15° (beyond neutral)
  • Abduction: 45-50°
  • Adduction: 20-30°
  • Internal rotation: 35-45°
  • External rotation: 45-50°

Testing Position:

  • Flexion: Supine, stabilize pelvis
  • Extension: Thomas test (supine) or prone
  • Abduction: Supine, stabilize pelvis
  • Rotation: Supine with hip flexed 90° or with hip extended

Thomas Test

Fixed flexion deformity assessment

Technique

  1. 1Patient supine
  2. 2Flex opposite hip fully to flatten lumbar lordosis
  3. 3Pelvis stabilized by full flexion of unaffected hip
  4. 4Observe affected leg
Positive Sign

Affected hip cannot rest flat on bed (flexion deformity)

Indicates

Fixed flexion deformity - measure angle between thigh and bed. FFD indicates hip OA, capsular contracture

Diagnostic Accuracy

Sensitivity89%

Ability to detect true positives

Specificity92%

Ability to exclude false positives

Key Concept

Fixed Flexion Deformity (FFD):

  • Develops as OA progresses
  • Compensated by lumbar hyperlordosis when standing
  • Causes increased energy expenditure in gait
  • Contributes to apparent leg length discrepancy
  • Target for surgical correction in THR

Leg Length Assessment

Leg Length Discrepancy

True vs Apparent:

  • True LLD: Measure ASIS to medial malleolus (bony length)
  • Apparent LLD: Measure umbilicus/xiphisternum to medial malleolus (functional)
  • Apparent greater than true = adduction deformity or pelvic obliquity

Causes of LLD in Hip OA:

  • True shortening: Superior migration of femoral head, femoral head collapse (AVN, OA)
  • Apparent shortening: Fixed adduction deformity
  • Apparent lengthening: Fixed abduction deformity

Galeazzi Test (Bryant Test):

  • Patient supine, hips and knees flexed, feet flat on bed
  • Observe knee heights
  • Unequal knee height indicates tibia or femur discrepancy

Functional Tests

Sit-to-Stand Test

Functional hip assessment

Technique

  1. 1Patient sits in standard chair (45cm height)
  2. 2Ask patient to stand up without using arms
  3. 3Observe ability and any compensation
Positive Sign

Difficulty rising, using arms to push up, trunk lean

Indicates

Hip weakness, pain, or stiffness

Diagnostic Accuracy

Sensitivity85%

Ability to detect true positives

Specificity60%

Ability to exclude false positives

Six-Meter Walk Test

Functional mobility

Technique

  1. 1Mark 6-meter distance
  2. 2Time patient walking at comfortable pace
  3. 3Note gait abnormalities, aid use
Positive Sign

Slow walking speed (under 1 m/s suggests significant impairment)

Indicates

Functional limitation - correlates with surgical outcomes

Diagnostic Accuracy

Sensitivity75%

Ability to detect true positives

Specificity65%

Ability to exclude false positives

Shoe Test

Functional hip ROM assessment

Technique

  1. 1Ask patient to put on shoes and socks (or demonstrate)
  2. 2Observe method used
Positive Sign

Unable to reach foot, needs assistance or devices

Indicates

Significant hip stiffness affecting daily function

Diagnostic Accuracy

Sensitivity91%

Ability to detect true positives

Specificity70%

Ability to exclude false positives

Severity Assessment

severitypainromfunctionxray
MildActivity-related, walking unlimitedMild restriction (IR mainly)Minor limitationJoint space greater than 2mm
ModerateAfter shorter walks, some rest painModerate restriction, developing FFDSignificant limitationJoint space 1-2mm
SevereNight pain, rest pain, very limited walkingSevere restriction, FFD greater than 15°Major ADL impairmentBone on bone

Differential Diagnosis

conditionpainLocationromspecialFeatures
Hip OAGroin, anterior thighCapsular patternMechanical pain, morning stiffness under 30 min
Lumbar SpineBack to buttock, below kneeHip ROM normalNeurological signs, SLR positive
Trochanteric BursitisLateral hipNormal (may resist abduction)Point tenderness over GT
AVNGroin (severe)May be normal earlyRisk factors, night pain early
Inflammatory ArthritisGroinPolyarticular oftenMorning stiffness greater than 30 min, systemic features
FAIGroinIR limited, others preservedYoung patient, FADIR positive

Imaging Correlation

Kellgren-Lawrence Grading (X-ray)

GradeFindings
0Normal
1Doubtful: possible osteophytic lipping
2Minimal: definite osteophytes, possible JSN
3Moderate: Moderate JSN, some sclerosis, cyst formation
4Severe: Large osteophytes, marked JSN, severe sclerosis, bone deformity

Note: Clinical severity may not correlate with radiographic severity

Preoperative Assessment for THR

What Examiners Want

Document for THR planning:

  • Walking distance (how far before stopping)
  • Night pain, rest pain
  • Analgesic use (type, frequency)
  • Failed conservative treatments
  • ROM restrictions (especially FFD)
  • Leg length discrepancy
  • Trendelenburg status
  • Medical fitness (ASA grade)
  • Patient expectations

Summary Presentation

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Presenting Your Findings

EXAMINER

"68-year-old woman with 3-year history of progressively worsening right hip pain. Now using a walking stick and can only walk 100 meters."

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Capsular pattern: IR > Extension > Abduction > Flexion
Thomas test quantifies fixed flexion deformity
Document walking distance and functional limitation
Trendelenburg indicates abductor dysfunction
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not checking lumbar spine as cause of groin/thigh pain
✗Forgetting to measure true vs apparent leg length
✗Missing FFD by not doing Thomas test properly
✗Not documenting functional impact (walking distance, ADLs)

Outcome Measures

Patient-Reported Outcomes

Harris Hip Score (HHS):

  • Maximum 100 points
  • Pain (44), Function (47), ROM (5), Deformity (4)
  • Under 70 poor, 70-79 fair, 80-89 good, 90-100 excellent

Oxford Hip Score (OHS):

  • 12 questions, patient-completed
  • Scores 0-48 (higher = better)
  • Widely used in registries (AOANJRR)

WOMAC:

  • 24 questions: Pain (5), Stiffness (2), Function (17)
  • Validated for hip and knee OA

Examiner Tips

Scoring High in Hip OA Assessment

High-Yield Exam Summary

Do

  • •Observe gait first (antalgic, Trendelenburg)
  • •Measure ROM systematically (document degrees)
  • •Perform Thomas test for FFD
  • •Assess true and apparent leg length
  • •Document functional impact (walking distance)

Don't

  • •Forget to compare with opposite side
  • •Miss the capsular pattern of restriction
  • •Skip Thomas test
  • •Ignore lumbar spine as differential
  • •Forget neurovascular assessment
Quick Reference
Time Allocation5 min
Joint/RegionHip
Typefocused
Updated2025-12-26
Examination Framework
  • Look - Inspection
  • Feel - Palpation
  • Move - ROM & Power
  • Special Tests
  • Neurovascular
Tags
hip
osteoarthritis
arthroplasty
THR
ROM
Related Examinations
  • hip comprehensive
  • hip fai
  • gait analysis