Above-Knee Amputation (Transfemoral)
Surgical technique guide for Above-Knee (Transfemoral) Amputation - FRCS/FRACS exam preparation
Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team
Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team
Equal anterior-posterior fish-mouth flaps with adductor magnus myodesis | intermediate
Surgical Imaging
Imaging Gallery


Critical Danger Structures
Danger 1: Sciatic Nerve
Sciatic nerve. Location: Lies deep within the posterior compartment, posterior to the adductor magnus and femur. Protection: Isolate, apply gentle distal traction, divide sharply high and allow it to retract proximally away from the weight-bearing surface. Ligate the accompanying nerve vessel (arteria comitans nervi ischiadici) before division to prevent troublesome bleeding. Crude pulling or burying under tension causes painful neuroma.
Danger 2: Femoral Vessels
Superficial femoral artery and vein. Location: Within the adductor (Hunter's) canal medially between the quadriceps and adductors. Protection: Identify in the canal, dissect free, doubly ligate the artery and vein separately with non-absorbable ties (transfixion plus simple ligature for the artery). Inadequate ligation causes reactionary haemorrhage and stump haematoma compromising healing in dysvascular tissue.
Danger 3: Flap Tension / Wound Breakdown
Soft-tissue envelope in the dysvascular limb. Location: Skin and myofascial flaps over the distal femur. Protection: Cut flaps long enough for tension-free closure, handle skin atraumatically, avoid crushing forceps, achieve meticulous haemostasis. In the diabetic/dysvascular patient, tension or haematoma leads to flap necrosis and conversion to a higher level.
Danger 4: Abduction-Flexion Contracture
Hip abductor and flexor imbalance. Location: Functional - the unopposed gluteus medius/minimus and iliopsoas pull the residual femur into abduction and flexion when the adductors and hamstrings are detached. Protection: Perform adductor magnus myodesis to restore adduction, position the hip neutral, encourage prone lying. Established contracture makes prosthetic alignment and gait impossible.
Danger 5: Phantom Pain / Symptomatic Neuroma
Sciatic and cutaneous nerve endings. Location: Cut nerve ends within the stump and at the skin edge. Protection: Sharp division under traction so the nerve retracts into healthy muscle away from the scar and bone end; minimise traction on cutaneous nerves. Neuromas adherent to scar or bone cause focal weight-bearing pain; pre-operative analgesic optimisation reduces persistent phantom pain.
FLAPSFLAPS - Key Technical Goals
STUMPSTUMP - Contracture & Stump Care
Primary Indications
Absolute / Common Indications
- Dysvascular / diabetic limb with critical ischaemia or extensive tissue loss not amenable to below-knee amputation (inadequate distal perfusion or unsalvageable posterior flap)
- Severe trauma with non-reconstructable limb, or failed limb salvage where the knee cannot be preserved
- Life-threatening infection / necrotising soft-tissue infection or wet gangrene extending proximal to a viable transtibial level
- Tumour requiring proximal margins where limb-sparing surgery is not feasible
- Non-functional limb (fixed deformity, paralysis, intractable pain) where a transfemoral residual limb is more useful than the diseased limb
Relative Indications
- Failed transtibial amputation requiring revision to a higher level
- Severe knee flexion contracture making a transtibial prosthesis unworkable
- Multiply revised, chronically infected transtibial stump
Contraindications / Cautions
- A viable transtibial level achievable - preserve the knee whenever possible for the metabolic and rehabilitation advantage
- Patient who is a candidate for successful revascularisation should have vascular assessment first
- Proximal disease that will not heal at the transfemoral level may require hip disarticulation
Level Selection and the Energy / Mobility Trade-off
The single most important strategic decision is how proximal to amputate. Each level preserved below the knee dramatically improves function.
Energy Expenditure
- Walking after amputation costs more oxygen and is slower with each more proximal level. Waters' classic gait-laboratory work demonstrated a stepwise rise in energy cost from transtibial to transfemoral amputation, with the dysvascular transfemoral amputee having the highest oxygen cost per metre and the slowest comfortable walking speed.
- The knee joint and the lever arm of a longer residual limb are biomechanically efficient; losing the knee removes a key shock-absorbing and energy-storing joint.
Prosthetic Rehabilitation / Mobility
- A substantial proportion of dysvascular transfemoral amputees never achieve independent prosthetic ambulation, in contrast with the higher community-ambulation rates after transtibial amputation.
- Predictors of successful prosthetic mobility include younger age, better cognition, absence of contralateral limb disease, and good cardiovascular reserve. Tools such as the AMPREDICT model help quantify the probability of prosthetic mobility and inform realistic counselling.
Practical Rule
- Save the knee if the tissue allows it. Choose transfemoral amputation only when a healed, functional transtibial stump is not achievable - the trade-off is fewer wound complications/healing at the higher level versus a major loss of walking economy and independence.
Evidence Base
Myodesis vs Myoplasty
- Myodesis (suturing muscle directly to bone through drill holes) produces a stable, dynamic stump with maintained muscle tension - particularly adductor magnus myodesis to restore femoral adduction. Gottschalk's biomechanical work showed that failure to reattach the adductor magnus allows the femur to drift into abduction and flexion, shortening the adductor lever and impairing prosthetic gait.
- Myoplasty (suturing opposing muscle groups to each other over the bone end) is technically simpler and may be preferred when bone fixation is unsafe, but the muscle envelope is less securely anchored and may retract, giving weaker adduction control.
Healing and Outcomes
- Transfemoral amputation has a higher primary healing rate than transtibial in poorly perfused limbs, which is precisely why it is chosen when a BKA would fail - but this gain is offset by inferior functional outcome.
- Mortality after major dysvascular lower-limb amputation is high, reflecting the comorbid (diabetic, cardiovascular) population rather than the operation itself - this must frame pre-operative counselling.
Key Evidence
Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation
Transfemoral amputation. Biomechanics and surgery
The biomechanics of trans-femoral amputation
AMPREDICT PROsthetics - Predicting Prosthesis Mobility to Aid in Prosthetic Prescription and Rehabilitation Planning
Phantom limb pain
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Use these scenarios to practise clinical reasoning and management decisions
"A 68-year-old man with type 2 diabetes and peripheral vascular disease has wet gangrene of the forefoot extending into the leg. The vascular team report unreconstructable distal disease and a non-viable posterior calf. You are deciding between a below-knee and an above-knee amputation. How do you choose the level, and what do you tell the patient about the consequences of an above-knee amputation?"
"Describe the key technical steps of a transfemoral amputation. In particular, how do you manage the femur, the major vessels, and the sciatic nerve, and what is a myodesis?"
"A patient is six weeks post transfemoral amputation. The stump has healed but the physiotherapist reports the hip is held flexed and abducted and prosthetic casting is being delayed. Separately, the patient describes severe burning pain in the foot that is no longer there. How do you explain and manage these two problems?"
Above-Knee (Transfemoral) Amputation - Exam Summary
Clinical summary
References
-
Waters RL, Perry J, Antonelli D, Hislop H. Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(1):42-46. Classic gait-laboratory study establishing the stepwise rise in walking energy cost with more proximal amputation, highest in dysvascular transfemoral amputees.
-
Gottschalk F. Transfemoral amputation. Biomechanics and surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;(361):15-22. Cornerstone description of transfemoral surgical technique emphasising adductor magnus myodesis to maintain femoral adduction.
-
Gottschalk FA, Stills M. The biomechanics of trans-femoral amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1994;18(1):12-17. Biomechanical analysis showing that failure to reattach the adductor magnus permits abduction-flexion drift of the residual femur.
-
Pinzur MS, Gottschalk F, Smith D, et al. Multidisciplinary preoperative assessment and late function in dysvascular amputees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;(281):239-243. Demonstrates the value of preoperative assessment and the functional limitations of dysvascular amputees.
-
Pinzur MS, Gottschalk FA, Pinto MA, Smith DG. Controversies in lower-extremity amputation. Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:663-672. Instructional review of level selection, technique, and rehabilitation controversies in lower-limb amputation.
-
Norvell DC, Thompson ML, Baraff A, et al. AMPREDICT PROsthetics - Predicting Prosthesis Mobility to Aid in Prosthetic Prescription and Rehabilitation Planning. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023;104(4):523-532. Validated multivariable model (357 dysvascular amputees) predicting prosthetic mobility to guide prescription and counselling.
-
Penn-Barwell JG, Bennett PM, Kay A, Sargeant ID; Severe Lower Extremity Combat Trauma Study Group. Medium-term outcomes following limb salvage for severe open tibia fracture are similar to trans-tibial amputation. Injury. 2015;46(2):288-291. Comparative trauma outcome data informing the salvage-versus-amputation decision.
-
Reichmann JP, Stevens PM, Rheinstein J, Kreulen CD. Removable Rigid Dressings for Postoperative Management of Transtibial Amputations: A Review of Published Evidence. PM R. 2018;10(5):516-523. Review supporting rigid dressings for oedema control, stump shaping, and faster prosthetic readiness (principles applicable to transfemoral care).
-
Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ. Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology and recent trends in the United States. South Med J. 2002;95(8):875-883. Population-level epidemiology confirming dysvascular disease as the dominant cause of major lower-limb amputation.
-
Nikolajsen L, Jensen TS. Phantom limb pain. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87(1):107-116. Authoritative review of the mechanisms and management of phantom limb pain relevant to perioperative analgesic planning.