General

Above-Knee Amputation (Transfemoral)

Surgical technique guide for Above-Knee (Transfemoral) Amputation - FRCS/FRACS exam preparation

Core Procedure
intermediate
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

High-yield overview

Equal anterior-posterior fish-mouth flaps with adductor magnus myodesis | intermediate

Surgical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Left above-knee amputation stump with sutured flap closure after blunt knee trauma
Immediate post-operative appearance of a left transfemoral (above-knee) amputation: rounded sutured stump showing the fish-mouth flap closure, performed for popliteal artery injury from blunt knee trauma.Credit: Imerci A et al. via Open-i NIH (PMC3966444) (CC BY PMC Open Access)
Transfemoral amputation stump in standing patient wearing compression dressing
Clinical appearance of a healed transfemoral (above-knee) amputation stump: patient standing with compression dressing applied, illustrating the characteristic short femoral segment and stump contour in preparation for prosthetic fitting.Credit: Boussakri H et al. via Open-i NIH (PMC4337260) (CC BY PMC Open Access)

Critical Danger Structures

Danger 1: Sciatic Nerve

Sciatic nerve. Location: Lies deep within the posterior compartment, posterior to the adductor magnus and femur. Protection: Isolate, apply gentle distal traction, divide sharply high and allow it to retract proximally away from the weight-bearing surface. Ligate the accompanying nerve vessel (arteria comitans nervi ischiadici) before division to prevent troublesome bleeding. Crude pulling or burying under tension causes painful neuroma.

Danger 2: Femoral Vessels

Superficial femoral artery and vein. Location: Within the adductor (Hunter's) canal medially between the quadriceps and adductors. Protection: Identify in the canal, dissect free, doubly ligate the artery and vein separately with non-absorbable ties (transfixion plus simple ligature for the artery). Inadequate ligation causes reactionary haemorrhage and stump haematoma compromising healing in dysvascular tissue.

Danger 3: Flap Tension / Wound Breakdown

Soft-tissue envelope in the dysvascular limb. Location: Skin and myofascial flaps over the distal femur. Protection: Cut flaps long enough for tension-free closure, handle skin atraumatically, avoid crushing forceps, achieve meticulous haemostasis. In the diabetic/dysvascular patient, tension or haematoma leads to flap necrosis and conversion to a higher level.

Danger 4: Abduction-Flexion Contracture

Hip abductor and flexor imbalance. Location: Functional - the unopposed gluteus medius/minimus and iliopsoas pull the residual femur into abduction and flexion when the adductors and hamstrings are detached. Protection: Perform adductor magnus myodesis to restore adduction, position the hip neutral, encourage prone lying. Established contracture makes prosthetic alignment and gait impossible.

Danger 5: Phantom Pain / Symptomatic Neuroma

Sciatic and cutaneous nerve endings. Location: Cut nerve ends within the stump and at the skin edge. Protection: Sharp division under traction so the nerve retracts into healthy muscle away from the scar and bone end; minimise traction on cutaneous nerves. Neuromas adherent to scar or bone cause focal weight-bearing pain; pre-operative analgesic optimisation reduces persistent phantom pain.

Mnemonic

FLAPSFLAPS - Key Technical Goals

Mnemonic

STUMPSTUMP - Contracture & Stump Care

Primary Indications

Absolute / Common Indications

  • Dysvascular / diabetic limb with critical ischaemia or extensive tissue loss not amenable to below-knee amputation (inadequate distal perfusion or unsalvageable posterior flap)
  • Severe trauma with non-reconstructable limb, or failed limb salvage where the knee cannot be preserved
  • Life-threatening infection / necrotising soft-tissue infection or wet gangrene extending proximal to a viable transtibial level
  • Tumour requiring proximal margins where limb-sparing surgery is not feasible
  • Non-functional limb (fixed deformity, paralysis, intractable pain) where a transfemoral residual limb is more useful than the diseased limb

Relative Indications

  • Failed transtibial amputation requiring revision to a higher level
  • Severe knee flexion contracture making a transtibial prosthesis unworkable
  • Multiply revised, chronically infected transtibial stump

Contraindications / Cautions

  • A viable transtibial level achievable - preserve the knee whenever possible for the metabolic and rehabilitation advantage
  • Patient who is a candidate for successful revascularisation should have vascular assessment first
  • Proximal disease that will not heal at the transfemoral level may require hip disarticulation

Level Selection and the Energy / Mobility Trade-off

The single most important strategic decision is how proximal to amputate. Each level preserved below the knee dramatically improves function.

Energy Expenditure

  • Walking after amputation costs more oxygen and is slower with each more proximal level. Waters' classic gait-laboratory work demonstrated a stepwise rise in energy cost from transtibial to transfemoral amputation, with the dysvascular transfemoral amputee having the highest oxygen cost per metre and the slowest comfortable walking speed.
  • The knee joint and the lever arm of a longer residual limb are biomechanically efficient; losing the knee removes a key shock-absorbing and energy-storing joint.

Prosthetic Rehabilitation / Mobility

  • A substantial proportion of dysvascular transfemoral amputees never achieve independent prosthetic ambulation, in contrast with the higher community-ambulation rates after transtibial amputation.
  • Predictors of successful prosthetic mobility include younger age, better cognition, absence of contralateral limb disease, and good cardiovascular reserve. Tools such as the AMPREDICT model help quantify the probability of prosthetic mobility and inform realistic counselling.

Practical Rule

  • Save the knee if the tissue allows it. Choose transfemoral amputation only when a healed, functional transtibial stump is not achievable - the trade-off is fewer wound complications/healing at the higher level versus a major loss of walking economy and independence.

Evidence Base

Myodesis vs Myoplasty

  • Myodesis (suturing muscle directly to bone through drill holes) produces a stable, dynamic stump with maintained muscle tension - particularly adductor magnus myodesis to restore femoral adduction. Gottschalk's biomechanical work showed that failure to reattach the adductor magnus allows the femur to drift into abduction and flexion, shortening the adductor lever and impairing prosthetic gait.
  • Myoplasty (suturing opposing muscle groups to each other over the bone end) is technically simpler and may be preferred when bone fixation is unsafe, but the muscle envelope is less securely anchored and may retract, giving weaker adduction control.

Healing and Outcomes

  • Transfemoral amputation has a higher primary healing rate than transtibial in poorly perfused limbs, which is precisely why it is chosen when a BKA would fail - but this gain is offset by inferior functional outcome.
  • Mortality after major dysvascular lower-limb amputation is high, reflecting the comorbid (diabetic, cardiovascular) population rather than the operation itself - this must frame pre-operative counselling.

Key Evidence

Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation

Level III
Waters RL, Perry J, Antonelli D, Hislop H • J Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical Implication: When preservation of function is the priority, amputate at the lowest level that will heal - the knee is biomechanically valuable and its loss markedly raises the metabolic cost of prosthetic walking. This is the central argument for fighting for a transtibial level whenever tissue allows.

Transfemoral amputation. Biomechanics and surgery

Level V
Gottschalk F • Clin Orthop Relat Res
Clinical Implication: Adductor magnus myodesis is the technique-defining step of a modern transfemoral amputation: it preserves the adduction moment, maintains femoral alignment, and is the surgical antidote to the abduction-flexion contracture that wrecks prosthetic fitting.

The biomechanics of trans-femoral amputation

Level V
Gottschalk FA, Stills M • Prosthet Orthot Int
Clinical Implication: Provides the mechanistic basis for myodesis: a muscle-preserving amputation that keeps adductor magnus intact and re-anchored prevents abduction of the residual femur and eases prosthetic ambulation.

AMPREDICT PROsthetics - Predicting Prosthesis Mobility to Aid in Prosthetic Prescription and Rehabilitation Planning

Level II
Norvell DC, Thompson ML, Baraff A, et al • Arch Phys Med Rehabil
Clinical Implication: Objective tools such as AMPREDICT support realistic, individualised counselling about probable prosthetic mobility and guide appropriate device prescription - particularly important given the lower independent-ambulation rates after transfemoral amputation.

Phantom limb pain

Level V
Nikolajsen L, Jensen TS • Br J Anaesth
Clinical Implication: Plan multimodal perioperative analgesia (regional techniques, gabapentinoids) to reduce central sensitisation, and distinguish phantom pain from stump pain and a focal neuroma, because each is managed differently.

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Use these scenarios to practise clinical reasoning and management decisions

CLINICAL SCENARIOStandard

CLINICAL PROMPT

"A 68-year-old man with type 2 diabetes and peripheral vascular disease has wet gangrene of the forefoot extending into the leg. The vascular team report unreconstructable distal disease and a non-viable posterior calf. You are deciding between a below-knee and an above-knee amputation. How do you choose the level, and what do you tell the patient about the consequences of an above-knee amputation?"

PRACTICAL APPROACH
The guiding principle is to amputate at the lowest level that will reliably heal while preserving as much function as possible - and the knee is the most valuable joint to keep. I would assess perfusion and tissue viability clinically and with the vascular team's input. A transtibial amputation requires a healthy, well-perfused posterior flap; if, as here, the posterior calf is non-viable or perfusion is inadequate, a below-knee amputation will not heal and a transfemoral amputation is the correct choice. I would not chase a doomed BKA at the cost of repeated revisions and sepsis in a comorbid diabetic. I would explain the central trade-off honestly. Losing the knee roughly doubles the metabolic cost of walking and slows comfortable walking speed - Waters' gait-laboratory work showed the dysvascular transfemoral amputee has the highest oxygen cost and slowest speed of all amputation levels. A significant proportion of older dysvascular above-knee amputees never achieve independent prosthetic community walking, whereas transtibial amputees do much better. So while the higher level heals more reliably, it costs him substantial walking economy and independence. I would also counsel on the realities of this population: perioperative mortality after major dysvascular amputation is high because of the underlying cardiac and diabetic disease, and the contralateral limb is also at risk. I would set realistic goals - he may become a household rather than a community ambulator, or may choose a wheelchair-based lifestyle - and involve the rehabilitation team early. Pre-operative analgesic optimisation is started to reduce phantom limb pain.
CLINICAL SCENARIOStandard

CLINICAL PROMPT

"Describe the key technical steps of a transfemoral amputation. In particular, how do you manage the femur, the major vessels, and the sciatic nerve, and what is a myodesis?"

PRACTICAL APPROACH
I position the patient supine with a bump under the ipsilateral hip and mark equal anterior-posterior or fish-mouth flaps whose combined length matches the thigh diameter at the bone-section level so I can close without tension. I plan the femoral cut at approximately 12 cm above the knee joint line - long enough to give a good lever arm, but short enough to leave room for a prosthetic knee unit. I raise fasciocutaneous-myocutaneous flaps and handle the dysvascular skin atraumatically. For the vessels, I identify the superficial femoral artery and vein in the adductor canal medially and doubly ligate each separately with non-absorbable ties - a transfixion plus a simple ligature for the artery - and control profunda perforators as I divide the muscle. For the sciatic nerve in the posterior compartment, I first ligate its accompanying vessel, the arteria comitans, then apply gentle distal traction and divide the nerve sharply with a fresh blade so the cut end retracts proximally into muscle, away from the bone end and the scar - this reduces troublesome neuroma. I then transect the femur with an oscillating saw, bevel the anterior cortex, and rasp all edges smooth. A myodesis is the secure reattachment of muscle directly to bone through drill holes. The critical one here is adductor magnus myodesis: I drill the lateral femoral cortex and suture the adductor magnus across the bone end under physiological tension with the hip in adduction. This restores the adduction moment and prevents the abduction-flexion contracture that occurs when the adductors are left detached and the abductors and flexors pull unopposed. This contrasts with a myoplasty, where opposing muscle groups are sutured to each other over the bone end - simpler, but the envelope is less securely anchored. I then cover the bevelled femur with bevelled quadriceps, obtain meticulous haemostasis, place a suction drain, close without tension, and apply a rigid or compressive dressing with the hip held neutral.
CLINICAL SCENARIOStandard

CLINICAL PROMPT

"A patient is six weeks post transfemoral amputation. The stump has healed but the physiotherapist reports the hip is held flexed and abducted and prosthetic casting is being delayed. Separately, the patient describes severe burning pain in the foot that is no longer there. How do you explain and manage these two problems?"

PRACTICAL APPROACH
The fixed posture is an early abduction-flexion contracture of the hip. When the adductors and hamstrings are detached at amputation, the abductors (gluteus medius and minimus) and hip flexors (iliopsoas, rectus femoris) act relatively unopposed and pull the residual femur into abduction and flexion. If a myodesis was not performed, or if the limb has been nursed in a poor position - particularly with a pillow under the stump or prolonged sitting - the deformity develops quickly and makes prosthetic alignment and a normal gait impossible. Management at six weeks, while it is still likely correctable, is aggressive physiotherapy: passive and active stretching into extension and adduction, a daily prone-lying programme to stretch the hip flexors, strengthening of the hip extensors and remaining adductors, and strict avoidance of any pillow under the stump or prolonged hip flexion. If the contracture were already fixed and refractory, surgical soft-tissue release would be considered, but I would exhaust therapy first. Preventing this is exactly why adductor magnus myodesis and neutral positioning matter from day one. The burning pain in the absent foot is phantom limb pain - neuropathic pain perceived in the missing limb, distinct from stump (residual-limb) pain. It arises from peripheral and central sensitisation after nerve division. Management is multimodal: neuropathic agents such as gabapentin or pregabalin, or a tricyclic like amitriptyline, combined with non-pharmacological measures including mirror therapy, desensitisation, TENS, and early functional prosthetic use. Good perioperative and acute pain control reduces the risk of persistent phantom pain, and refractory cases warrant referral to a specialist pain team. I would also examine for a focal, tender, Tinel-positive neuroma, which is a treatable and distinct cause of stump pain.

Above-Knee (Transfemoral) Amputation - Exam Summary

Clinical summary

References

  1. Waters RL, Perry J, Antonelli D, Hislop H. Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(1):42-46. Classic gait-laboratory study establishing the stepwise rise in walking energy cost with more proximal amputation, highest in dysvascular transfemoral amputees.

  2. Gottschalk F. Transfemoral amputation. Biomechanics and surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;(361):15-22. Cornerstone description of transfemoral surgical technique emphasising adductor magnus myodesis to maintain femoral adduction.

  3. Gottschalk FA, Stills M. The biomechanics of trans-femoral amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1994;18(1):12-17. Biomechanical analysis showing that failure to reattach the adductor magnus permits abduction-flexion drift of the residual femur.

  4. Pinzur MS, Gottschalk F, Smith D, et al. Multidisciplinary preoperative assessment and late function in dysvascular amputees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;(281):239-243. Demonstrates the value of preoperative assessment and the functional limitations of dysvascular amputees.

  5. Pinzur MS, Gottschalk FA, Pinto MA, Smith DG. Controversies in lower-extremity amputation. Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:663-672. Instructional review of level selection, technique, and rehabilitation controversies in lower-limb amputation.

  6. Norvell DC, Thompson ML, Baraff A, et al. AMPREDICT PROsthetics - Predicting Prosthesis Mobility to Aid in Prosthetic Prescription and Rehabilitation Planning. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023;104(4):523-532. Validated multivariable model (357 dysvascular amputees) predicting prosthetic mobility to guide prescription and counselling.

  7. Penn-Barwell JG, Bennett PM, Kay A, Sargeant ID; Severe Lower Extremity Combat Trauma Study Group. Medium-term outcomes following limb salvage for severe open tibia fracture are similar to trans-tibial amputation. Injury. 2015;46(2):288-291. Comparative trauma outcome data informing the salvage-versus-amputation decision.

  8. Reichmann JP, Stevens PM, Rheinstein J, Kreulen CD. Removable Rigid Dressings for Postoperative Management of Transtibial Amputations: A Review of Published Evidence. PM R. 2018;10(5):516-523. Review supporting rigid dressings for oedema control, stump shaping, and faster prosthetic readiness (principles applicable to transfemoral care).

  9. Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ. Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology and recent trends in the United States. South Med J. 2002;95(8):875-883. Population-level epidemiology confirming dysvascular disease as the dominant cause of major lower-limb amputation.

  10. Nikolajsen L, Jensen TS. Phantom limb pain. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87(1):107-116. Authoritative review of the mechanisms and management of phantom limb pain relevant to perioperative analgesic planning.