Paediatrics

Epiphysiodesis for Leg-Length Discrepancy

Surgical technique guide for permanent growth-plate arrest to equalise leg-length discrepancy - timing, growth prediction, percutaneous drill/curette, Phemister, and percutaneous transphyseal screw (PETS) techniques

Core Procedure
intermediate
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow β€’ Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

High-yield overview

Permanent growth-plate arrest of the longer limb to equalise leg length | intermediate

Surgical Imaging

Percutaneous epiphysiodesis technique
Percutaneous epiphysiodesis: a drill and curette ablate the growth plate through small metaphyseal portals under fluoroscopy, permanently arresting growth to equalise a leg-length discrepancy.Credit: AI-generated medical image Β· OrthoVellum
Percutaneous transphyseal screws (PETS)
Percutaneous transphyseal screws (PETS) bridge the distal femoral and proximal tibial physes to arrest growth β€” a technically simple alternative when timed correctly.Credit: AI-generated medical image Β· OrthoVellum
Long-leg scanogram for leg-length discrepancy
A standing full-length scanogram quantifies the leg-length discrepancy and, with bone age, lets the timing of epiphysiodesis be planned (Green-Anderson, Moseley or Paley methods).Credit: AI-generated medical image Β· OrthoVellum

Critical Concepts and Exam Traps

Timing Is Irreversible

The trap: Treating epiphysiodesis like a reversible adjustment. Once the physis is destroyed it does not recover β€” there is no second chance to fine-tune length.

The fix: Confirm bone age (Greulich-Pyle), recalculate predicted discrepancy at maturity using at least one validated method, and choose the operative date so that the remaining growth of the long limb exactly equals the discrepancy to be corrected.

Bone Age vs Chronological Age

Location of error: Using the child's birthday rather than skeletal maturity. A delayed or advanced bone age of one to two years completely changes how much growth remains.

Risk: Mistiming by even a year alters the final correction by roughly 1 cm at the distal femur. Always obtain a current left-hand and wrist radiograph (Greulich-Pyle) or use the Sauvegrain elbow method around the pubertal growth spurt.

Asymmetric Arrest = Angular Deformity

Location: Incomplete obliteration of part of the physis β€” a peripheral medial or lateral bridge keeps growing while the rest is arrested.

Risk: A residual medial bar produces valgus, a lateral bar produces varus. For a length-equalisation epiphysiodesis the arrest must be COMPLETE and symmetric across the entire physis, ablating the peripheral perichondrial ring.

Epiphysiodesis vs Lengthening

Epiphysiodesis: Best for predicted LLD of roughly 2 to 5 cm in a skeletally immature child with growth to spare β€” low morbidity but sacrifices height.

Lengthening: For discrepancies greater than 5 cm, or when shortening the long limb is unacceptable β€” distraction osteogenesis (frame or magnetic nail), longer, higher complication burden.

Permanent vs Temporary (Hemi)

Permanent epiphysiodesis: Destroys the whole physis to STOP LENGTH β€” drill/curette, Phemister, or PETS used to bridge the entire plate.

Hemiepiphysiodesis: Tethers ONE SIDE of the physis (tension-band plate / staples) to correct ANGULAR deformity β€” guided growth, typically reversible by removing the implant.

Height and Contralateral Knee Level

Counselling point: The family must understand the child loses centimetres of final height and the knee on the operated side ends up at a slightly lower level than genetic potential would predict.

Implication: Document predicted final height, discuss cosmesis of overall stature versus a lengthening alternative, and obtain informed consent specifically covering the height trade-off and the small risk of mistiming.

Mnemonic

A.R.R.E.S.TARREST β€” Principles of Permanent Epiphysiodesis

Mnemonic

A.S.S.E.S.SASSESS β€” Work-up of Leg-Length Discrepancy

Surgical Indications

Ideal Candidate

  • Predicted leg-length discrepancy at maturity of roughly 2 to 5 cm β€” the sweet spot for epiphysiodesis
  • Sufficient growth remaining in the long limb to make up the discrepancy before physeal closure
  • Skeletally immature β€” bone age before the end of growth (broadly girls up to ~14 years, boys up to ~16 years bone age, but timing is calculated individually)
  • A family who understands and accepts the loss of final height in exchange for avoiding lengthening

Relative Indications

  • Discrepancy of less than 2 cm rarely needs surgery β€” shoe raise or observation is usually sufficient
  • Discrepancy of 2 to 2.5 cm may be managed non-operatively in some patients; epiphysiodesis offered if symptomatic or progressive
  • Mild discrepancy in the context of an underlying syndrome where lengthening morbidity is undesirable

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Skeletal maturity reached (physis closed β€” no growth left to arrest)
  • Predicted discrepancy greater than 5 cm where shortening the long limb would leave the patient unacceptably short β€” favour lengthening
  • Active infection at the operative site

Relative:

  • Very large discrepancies better served by lengthening (or combined lengthening plus contralateral epiphysiodesis)
  • Significant short stature where any height loss is poorly tolerated
  • Uncertain or unreliable growth prediction (insufficient serial data, ambiguous bone age)

Why Timing Is Everything

The entire success of the operation depends on doing it at the moment when the growth that the long limb has left to give exactly equals the discrepancy you wish to correct. Arrest is permanent and immediate β€” the physis stops growing from the day of surgery.

  • Too early β€” the long limb stops growing while too much growth remains; the short limb overtakes it β†’ overcorrection (now the previously short leg is longer)
  • Too late β€” insufficient growth remains in the long limb to make up the difference β†’ undercorrection (residual discrepancy)

Growth Prediction Drives the Operative Date

Three validated methods are used (covered in detail in the next tab):

  • Green-Anderson growth-remaining charts (built on Menschik data)
  • Moseley straight-line graph
  • Paley multiplier method

All require bone age, not chronological age. A delayed or advanced skeletal age of one to two years substantially changes the remaining-growth estimate.

Epiphysiodesis vs Limb Lengthening β€” Choosing the Strategy


Clinical Decision Scenarios

Use these scenarios to practise clinical reasoning and management decisions

CLINICAL SCENARIOStandard

CLINICAL PROMPT

"An 11-year-old girl is referred with a leg-length discrepancy following a previous distal femoral physeal injury. Clinically her right leg is 2 cm shorter. How would you assess her and decide whether epiphysiodesis is appropriate?"

PRACTICAL APPROACH
My goal is to determine the PREDICTED discrepancy at skeletal maturity, not just the current discrepancy, because the decision and timing of any epiphysiodesis depend on growth remaining. **History and examination**: I would confirm the aetiology β€” here a post-traumatic distal femoral physeal arrest β€” and assess for any associated angular deformity. Clinically I would measure the discrepancy with a block test (raising the short side until the pelvis is level) and by tape measurement from ASIS to medial malleolus, and assess gait and joint contractures. **Imaging**: I would obtain a standing long-leg radiograph or scanogram (or EOS) to measure true bone lengths and localise the discrepancy to the femur, tibia, or both. I would obtain a left hand and wrist radiograph to determine bone age by the Greulich-Pyle atlas β€” around puberty I might also use the Sauvegrain elbow method, as bone age, not her chronological age, drives every prediction. **Growth prediction**: I would use at least one validated method β€” the Green-Anderson growth-remaining charts, the Moseley straight-line graph (ideally with two or three serial measurements), or the Paley multiplier method β€” to project the discrepancy at maturity. **Decision**: A predicted discrepancy in the 2 to 5 cm range in a skeletally immature child with growth remaining is the ideal indication for epiphysiodesis. If predicted at maturity to be around 2 cm or more and she still has adequate growth left in the LONG (left) limb, I would offer epiphysiodesis of the long-side distal femur, timed so that the remaining growth equals the discrepancy. I would counsel the family that this shortens the long limb and reduces final height, and contrast it with lengthening of the short limb for larger discrepancies.
CLINICAL SCENARIOStandard

CLINICAL PROMPT

"Talk me through the timing calculation for an epiphysiodesis. A boy has a predicted discrepancy of 3 cm at maturity and you plan to arrest the distal femur of the long limb. How do you decide the moment to operate?"

PRACTICAL APPROACH
The principle is that the growth I REMOVE by arresting the physis must equal the discrepancy I want to correct. So I must arrest the physis when the growth it has left to give equals 3 cm. **Step 1 β€” bone age**: I obtain a current bone age (Greulich-Pyle). His chronological age is not reliable enough; a delayed or advanced skeletal age of a year or two materially changes the answer. **Step 2 β€” growth remaining at that physis**: Using the Green-Anderson growth-remaining charts (or the Moseley straight-line graph with serial data, or a Paley multiplier calculation), I read off how much growth the distal femoral physis has remaining at successive bone ages. As a sense-check, the distal femur grows roughly 9 to 10 mm per year (three-eighths inch) and the proximal tibia roughly 6 mm per year (one-quarter inch). **Step 3 β€” choose the moment**: I select the bone age at which the distal femoral physis still has about 3 cm of growth left. Arresting at that point removes exactly the 3 cm I need, so that the short limb catches up by maturity. Roughly, since the distal femur contributes about 1 cm per year, I would arrest when there are about three years of distal femoral growth remaining β€” but I would confirm this against the chart rather than relying on the rule of thumb. **Step 4 β€” which physis**: I match the level to where growth needs limiting. For a 3 cm correction I could arrest the distal femur alone (about 1 cm/year). If I wanted a larger or more rapid correction I could combine distal femur and proximal tibia of the long limb (adding the proximal fibula), which together give roughly 1.5 to 1.6 cm/year. **Caveat**: Because arrest is irreversible, I recalculate at each visit and confirm bone age close to the planned operative date, and I monitor with serial long-leg films afterwards to confirm convergence.
CLINICAL SCENARIOStandard

CLINICAL PROMPT

"You performed a percutaneous distal femoral epiphysiodesis 18 months ago. At follow-up the child has developed a progressive valgus deformity of that knee. What has happened and how do you manage it?"

PRACTICAL APPROACH
A progressive valgus deformity after a distal femoral epiphysiodesis is the classic sign of an INCOMPLETE or ASYMMETRIC arrest β€” specifically, residual growth on the MEDIAL side of the physis while the lateral side has been arrested. The medial physis continues to grow and tilts the joint into valgus. (Residual lateral physis would instead produce varus.) **Confirm the problem**: I would obtain standing long-leg (mechanical-axis) radiographs to quantify the deformity and the mechanical-axis deviation, and AP and lateral views of the distal femur to assess how much physis remains open medially. I would re-confirm bone age to know how much growth potential is left. **Why it happened**: The percutaneous curettage did not completely ablate the physis across its whole extent β€” most often the periphery (here medially) was left with viable growth plate. The distal femoral physis is undulating, so the anterior, posterior and peripheral portions can be missed if the cavity is not extended fully. **Management depends on remaining growth**: - **If significant growth remains**: I can complete the arrest of the residual (medial) physis so the deformity stops progressing, OR harness the residual growth itself to correct the valgus with guided growth β€” a temporary tension-band plate (hemiepiphysiodesis) on the LATERAL side of the same distal femoral physis, which tethers the lateral side and lets the still-open medial physis swing the limb back into alignment β€” provided enough growth is left for the tether to work. - **If little growth remains or the deformity is large**: a corrective distal femoral osteotomy is required to realign the mechanical axis. **Lesson**: complete, symmetric ablation is the single most important technical principle of epiphysiodesis for length, precisely to avoid this complication. I would also ensure ongoing surveillance until maturity to detect any further progression.

Epiphysiodesis for Leg-Length Discrepancy β€” Exam Day Summary

Clinical summary

Key Evidence

Growth and predictions of growth in the lower extremities (Green-Anderson data)

Level IV
Anderson M, Green WT, Messner MB β€’ J Bone Joint Surg Am (1963)
Clinical Implication: The original evidence base for the growth-remaining method of timing an epiphysiodesis; still quoted in every viva on leg-length discrepancy.

A straight-line graph for leg-length discrepancies

Level IV
Moseley CF β€’ J Bone Joint Surg Am (1977)
Clinical Implication: A graphical tool that integrates serial data and lets the surgeon simulate the timing and level of epiphysiodesis before committing to the irreversible procedure.

Multiplier method for predicting limb-length discrepancy

Level IV
Paley D, Bhave A, Herzenberg JE, Bowen JR β€’ J Bone Joint Surg Am (2000)
Clinical Implication: A quick single-time-point calculation, ideal for congenital proportionate discrepancies; for developmental discrepancies the growth-inhibition formula is used instead.

Percutaneous epiphysiodesis: experimental study and preliminary clinical results

Level IV
Canale ST, Russell TA, Holcomb RL β€’ J Pediatr Orthop (1986)
Clinical Implication: Provides the experimental and early clinical basis for the percutaneous drill/curette technique that is now the most widely used method worldwide.

Efficacy and late complications of percutaneous epiphysiodesis with transphyseal screws (PETS)

Level IV
Ilharreborde B, Gaumetou E, Souchet P, et al. β€’ J Bone Joint Surg Br (2012)
Clinical Implication: PETS arrest is gradual and often under-corrects β€” over-predict the planned correction; the high valgus and revision rate in the tibia is a key safety caveat versus the femur.

Additional References

  • MΓ©taizeau JP, Wong-Chung J, Bertrand H, Pasquier P (1998). Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws (PETS). J Pediatr Orthop 18:363-9. PMID 9600565. β€” Original description of PETS; mean bone-length inequality fell from 2.47 cm to 0.51 cm at maturity across 32 cases.
  • Bowen JR, Johnson WJ (1984). Percutaneous epiphysiodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 190:170-3. PMID 6488627. β€” Original clinical description of percutaneous drill/curette epiphysiodesis under image intensification.
  • Phemister DB (1933). Operative arrestment of longitudinal growth of bones in the treatment of deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am 15:1-15. β€” Original description of the open bone-block (Phemister) epiphysiodesis technique (predates PubMed indexing).
  • Aguilar JA, Paley D, Paley J, et al. (2005). Clinical validation of the multiplier method... part II. J Pediatr Orthop 25:192-6. PMID 15718900. DOI 10.1097/01.bpo.0000150808.90052.7c. β€” Validation cohort: multiplier method mean error for residual discrepancy ~0.9-1.0 cm, more accurate than Moseley for residual LLD after epiphysiodesis.