Galeazzi Fracture ORIF

Hand & WristIntermediateCore Procedure

Galeazzi Fracture ORIF

Open reduction and internal fixation of Galeazzi fracture-dislocation — distal-third radial shaft fracture with disruption of the distal radioulnar joint: recognition of DRUJ instability, volar Henry approach, anatomic plate fixation, DRUJ assessment, and staged management of residual instability

High-yield overview

Open reduction and internal fixation of the Galeazzi fracture-dislocation — distal-third radial shaft fracture with DRUJ disruption | intermediate

Surgical Imaging

Galeazzi fracture ORIF
Galeazzi injury: the distal radial shaft fracture is plated to anatomical length and rotation, then the distal radioulnar joint is assessed and stabilised.Credit: AI-generated medical illustration · OrthoVellum
Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
Radial Artery — Henry Approach Wrist

Location: The radial artery runs between brachioradialis and FCR in the distal forearm. At the level of the distal radial metaphysis it lies directly on the volar radius, just radial to the flexor carpi radialis tendon.

Risk: In the distal third of the Henry approach, the artery is closely applied to the bone. Aggressive subperiosteal dissection radially can lacerate the artery before the surgeon is aware of it. Retract the artery radially with brachioradialis after identifying it; keep the blade on bone throughout the exposure.

Posterior Interosseous Nerve — Proximal Henry

Location: The PIN (deep branch of the radial nerve) pierces the supinator muscle from anterior to posterior, winding around the radial neck. It lies approximately 6-8 cm proximal to the radiocapitellar joint line.

Risk: When extending the Henry approach proximally beyond the radial tuberosity, the PIN is at risk between the two heads of the supinator. The nerve is protected by keeping dissection on bone, supinating the forearm (which moves the PIN posteriorly), and NOT dissecting within the supinator muscle belly itself.

Superficial Radial Nerve

Location: The superficial radial nerve (SRN) emerges from beneath brachioradialis about 8-10 cm proximal to the radial styloid, piercing the deep fascia to lie in the subcutaneous plane on the dorsoradial forearm.

Risk: The SRN is vulnerable during subcutaneous dissection on the radial side of the forearm. It is not seen in the standard Henry interval, but retraction of brachioradialis radially can stretch it. Prolonged or vigorous retraction causes a neurapraxia presenting as numbness on the dorsoradial hand. Use intermittent, careful retraction and avoid retractors placed deep to brachioradialis distally.

DRUJ Assessment — The Critical Step

What to do: After plate fixation of the radius, the DRUJ must be assessed before wound closure. Examine stability in pronation, neutral, and supination with the elbow flexed 90 degrees. Apply volar and dorsal stress to the ulnar head.

Interpretation: (1) Stable in full ROM → cast in neutral. (2) Reducible but unstable (subluxates with stress) → K-wire transfixion in supination. (3) Irreducible (cannot seat the ulnar head) → open reduction of DRUJ — most commonly ECU tendon or capsule incarcerated in the joint.

Galeazzi vs Monteggia — Classic Exam Trap

Galeazzi (the memory aid: 'G' = radius 'goes' away from ulna): radial shaft fracture (usually distal third) with DRUJ disruption. The radial fracture is the obvious injury; the DRUJ disruption is the hidden one.

Monteggia ('M' = ulnar fracture 'meets' the radial head): proximal ulnar fracture with radial head dislocation. Different injury, different approach, different fixation — do not confuse them. The treatments are opposite (Galeazzi: radius fixation + DRUJ management; Monteggia: ulna fixation + radial head reduction).

Compartment Syndrome — Forearm

Risk: Forearm compartment syndrome can develop after high-energy Galeazzi fractures, particularly those with significant soft tissue swelling, crush mechanisms, or delayed presentation.

Recognition: Pain on passive stretch of the digits (particularly with wrist/finger extension), tense swollen compartments, paresthesiae. The radial artery pulse may still be present early. Compartment pressures greater than 30 mmHg (or within 30 mmHg of diastolic pressure) indicate the need for urgent fasciotomy. Do not rely on pulse status — it is a late finding.

Mnemonic

G.A.L.E.A.Z.Z.IGALEAZZI — Management Sequence

Mnemonic

D.R.U.J. S.T.A.B.L.EDRUJ STABLE — Intraoperative Assessment

Surgical Indications

Absolute Indications

  • Acute Galeazzi fracture-dislocation in an adult patient
  • Irreducible DRUJ dislocation (ECU or other soft tissue interposition)
  • Open fracture requiring debridement and stabilisation
  • Floating forearm (ipsilateral radius and ulnar shaft fracture)

Relative Indications

  • Displaced distal radial shaft fracture with radiographic evidence of DRUJ disruption (ulnar styloid base fracture, positive ulnar variance greater than 2 mm, ulnar head dislocation on lateral view)
  • Failed closed treatment in a paediatric patient approaching skeletal maturity

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Active infection over the surgical site
  • Unstable medical comorbidity precluding anaesthesia

Relative:

  • Non-displaced or minimally displaced distal radial shaft fracture with a clearly stable DRUJ on examination under anaesthesia (rare — only in lower-demand patients)
  • Severe osteopenia precluding plate fixation (consider alternative fixation, external fixation, or non-operative management with informed consent)

The 'Fracture of Necessity' — Why Non-Operative Treatment Fails

Non-operative management of Galeazzi fractures in adults has been abandoned because of an unacceptably high rate of treatment failure:

  • Closed reduction and cast immobilisation fails to maintain radial length in the vast majority
  • The brachioradialis and pronator quadratus produce deforming forces that shorten and malrotate the distal fragment
  • Persistent radial shortening greater than 2 mm leads to ulnar impaction, DRUJ incongruity, and pain
  • The classic study by Mikic (1975) showed 92% poor results with non-operative treatment versus 92% good-to-excellent with ORIF in his series

Evidence for Treatment

Surgical versus Non-Operative Management

Union rate
Non-Operative
60-70% (with late displacement)
ORIF
greater than 95%
DRUJ instability at follow-up
Non-Operative
Up to 50%
ORIF
5-10%
Malunion rate
Non-Operative
30-50%
ORIF
less than 5%
Return to work
Non-Operative
Delayed (prolonged casting)
ORIF
Mean 10-14 weeks
Grip strength recovery
Non-Operative
60-80% of contralateral
ORIF
85-95% of contralateral
Patient-reported satisfaction
Non-Operative
40-60% good-excellent
ORIF
85-95% good-excellent

Plate Fixation

  • 3.5 mm LC-DCP (limited contact dynamic compression plate) is the historical gold standard; requires precise contouring to the volar radial bow
  • 3.5 mm LCP (locking compression plate) offers angular stability in osteoporotic bone and less need for precise contouring; preferred in comminuted fractures
  • Dual plating (volar + radial or dorsal) is rarely needed but can be used for very distal fractures where a single plate has insufficient distal fixation
  • Bridge plating for comminuted segmental fractures where absolute stability is not achievable; aims for relative stability and indirect reduction

Timing of Surgery

Primary ORIF is recommended within 24-48 hours for closed injuries. Open fractures require emergency debridement and stabilisation at the first available theatre slot. Delayed reconstruction (greater than 3 weeks) is associated with more difficult reduction, higher complication rates, and less predictable DRUJ outcomes.

Galeazzi Fracture — Management Options Compared


Key Evidence

Evidence

Galeazzi fracture-dislocations

Level IV
Mikic ZD
Clinical implication: Established ORIF as the standard for Galeazzi fractures in adults; non-operative treatment should not be used in the adult population.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57(8):1071-80
Evidence

Results of compression-plating of closed Galeazzi fractures

Level IV
Moore TM, Klein JP, Patzakis MJ, Harvey JP Jr
Clinical implication: Reinforced the two essential tenets: anatomic radial fixation plus mandatory DRUJ assessment; poor outcomes almost always trace back to one of these being compromised.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(7):1015-21
Evidence

Galeazzi fracture-dislocation: a new treatment-oriented classification

Level IV
Rettig ME, Raskin KB
Clinical implication: The distance of the radial fracture from the joint is a reliable predictor of DRUJ disruption; fractures within 7.5 cm of the midcarpal joint require ORIF with mandatory DRUJ assessment.
Source: J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26(2):228-35
Evidence

The interosseous membrane of the forearm: structure and its role in Galeazzi fractures

Level IV
Schneiderman G, Meldrum RD, Bloebaum RD, Tarr R, Sarmiento A
Clinical implication: Explains the biomechanical rationale for anatomic radial fixation: restoring length tensions the IOM, which in turn stabilises the DRUJ. The IOM is the mechanical link between the radial fracture and the DRUJ.
Source: J Trauma. 1993;35(6):879-85

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

A 32-year-old man sustains a closed Galeazzi fracture of the right forearm after a fall from scaffolding. You have performed open reduction and internal fixation of the radial shaft through a volar Henry approach. The radius is plated with a 3.5 mm LC-DCP and the reduction looks anatomic on fluoroscopy. Talk me through your assessment of the DRUJ and the management options depending on what you find.

Practical approach
After radius fixation in a Galeazzi fracture, the DRUJ must be assessed before wound closure — this is the most critical step in the operation and the most commonly skipped one. I perform a systematic assessment in three steps:\n\n**Step 1: Clinical examination.** With the radius stabilised by the plate, I grasp the ulnar head between my thumb and index finger. I translate it volarly and dorsally and compare the translation to the contralateral uninjured wrist. I then examine the DRUJ through full passive pronation and supination. The DRUJ is normally most stable in supination and most unstable in pronation.\n\n**Step 2: Fluoroscopic assessment.** I take an AP of the wrist to check ulnar variance — it should be symmetric to the contralateral side, which provides a reference. A lateral view confirms whether the ulnar head is centred in the sigmoid notch. I stress the DRUJ in pronation under live fluoroscopy.\n\n**Step 3: Decision making.** There are three possible outcomes:\n\n**A — DRUJ reduced and stable through full ROM.** This occurs in approximately 40-50% of cases after anatomic radial fixation. The restored radial length tensions the interosseous membrane, which stabilises the DRUJ indirectly. No further surgical action is required. I apply a below-elbow cast or removable splint in neutral rotation for 6 weeks.\n\n**B — DRUJ reducible but unstable.** The ulnar head seats properly with supination but subluxates with stress. This patient needs DRUJ stabilisation. I percutaneously insert two 1.6 mm K-wires from the ulnar side, across the DRUJ into the radius, with the forearm held in full supination (the position of maximum DRUJ congruency). I confirm anatomic reduction on AP and lateral. I then apply an above-elbow cast in supination for 6-8 weeks. The K-wires are removed at 6-8 weeks in clinic.\n\n**C — DRUJ irreducible.** The ulnar head cannot be seated. This indicates interposed soft tissue — most commonly the ECU tendon, the DRUJ capsule, or a torn TFCC fragment. I explore the DRUJ through a separate dorsal incision (or extend the approach), relieve the interposition, reduce the DRUJ, and pin it as above. I consider TFCC repair if there is a large peripheral tear.\n\n**Key teaching point**: The most common error is to fix the radius and forget the DRUJ. The second most common error is to see the DRUJ reduced fluoroscopically but not stress it clinically — a reduced DRUJ is not necessarily a stable one.
Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

Describe the volar Henry approach to the radius. What are the key danger zones at each level, and how do you protect the posterior interosseous nerve during proximal exposure?

Practical approach
The volar Henry approach is the standard surgical approach for the radial shaft. It uses the interval between brachioradialis (radially) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR, ulnarly). I divide the approach into three zones based on the level of dissection.\n\n**Surface landmarks**: I palpate the radial styloid distally and the lateral epicondyle proximally. I mark the course of the radial artery at the wrist (palpable pulse before tourniquet inflation) and the FCR tendon, which lies just radial to the palmaris longus at the wrist crease. The skin incision is centred over FCR distally and curves along the radial border proximally.\n\n**Distal third (wrist to pronator quadratus)** — The key danger here is the RADIAL ARTERY. It runs between brachioradialis and FCR directly on the volar radius. After incising the deep fascia over FCR, I develop the interval by retracting FCR ulnarly and look for the radial artery — it is the defining structure of the interval. The artery is retracted radially WITH brachioradialis throughout the case. The SUPERFICIAL RADIAL NERVE emerges from beneath brachioradialis about 8-10 cm proximal to the radial styloid — I identify it in the subcutaneous plane and protect it from retraction injury. I elevate the pronator quadratus and FPL subperiosteally from radial to ulnar as a single layer.\n\n**Middle third (pronator quadratus to pronator teres)** — The radial artery moves away from the bone here, lying more volar between the muscle bellies. The FPL origin from the volar radius and the pronator teres insertion on the lateral radius at its junction with the middle third are encountered. The median nerve and its branches lie ulnar to this plane and are protected by staying on bone.\n\n**Proximal third (pronator teres to bicipital tuberosity)** — This is the zone of greatest risk for the POSTERIOR INTEROSSEOUS NERVE. The PIN is the deep branch of the radial nerve. It pierces the supinator muscle, winding from anterior to posterior around the radial neck, lying within the supinator substance approximately 6-8 cm proximal to the radiocapitellar joint. I take three specific precautions:\n\n1. **Supinate the forearm** — supination moves the PIN posterior and lateral, away from the volar radius and the surgical field\n2. **Stay subperiosteal** — I elevate the supinator from the radius using a periosteal elevator, keeping the instrument on bone. I do NOT dissect into the supinator muscle belly, where the nerve lies\n3. **No dorsal retractors** — I never place a retractor around the dorsal aspect of the proximal radius, as this would put pressure on the PIN where it emerges from the supinator dorsally\n\nAn additional structure in the proximal third is the RECURRENT RADIAL ARTERY (leash of Henry), which crosses the interval and may require ligation with 3-0 ties or bipolar electrocautery.\n\nIn summary: distal third — protect the radial artery; middle third — stay on bone; proximal third — supinate and stay subperiosteal to protect the PIN.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 28-year-old woman presents 10 weeks after ORIF of a Galeazzi fracture performed at another hospital. The radius was plated through a volar Henry approach and the operative report notes 'DRUJ was reduced and stable.' She now complains of persistent ulnar-sided wrist pain, a clunk with forearm rotation, and grip weakness. Her ulnar variance is +4 mm on the injured side versus +1 mm on the contralateral. The DRUJ is subluxated dorsally on stress views. How do you manage this patient?

Practical approach
This patient has symptomatic chronic DRUJ instability due to radial malunion — her ulnar variance of +4 mm indicates the radius healed in a shortened position, the interosseous membrane is lax, and the DRUJ is incongruent. At 10 weeks, the radius is likely united, and the window for acute DRUJ management has passed.\n\n**Initial assessment**: I would obtain:\n- Bilateral CT of both forearms in pronation and supination to quantify DRUJ subluxation, assess the sigmoid notch morphology, and confirm radial malunion (which is already indicated by the +4 mm variance)\n- The CT will also show whether there is any DRUJ arthritis developing (the most important prognostic factor)\n\n**Treatment plan (three-tiered approach)**:\n\n**First — address the radial malunion**: The +4 mm ulnar positive variance is the root cause. I plan a radial corrective osteotomy: I expose the radius through the previous Henry approach, osteotomise at the original fracture site (or at the level of the malunion), distract to restore correct ulnar variance (matched to the contralateral side), and re-fix with a 3.5 mm LCP (locking plate provides better angular stability in a revision setting). I consider iliac crest bone graft autograft or allograft tricalcium phosphate wedges if there is a gap after distraction.\n\n**Second — reassess the DRUJ after osteotomy**: Once the radius is restored to correct length and rotation, I stress the DRUJ intraoperatively. In many cases of secondary DRUJ instability from malunion, restoring radial length alone re-tensions the interosseous membrane and improves stability. If the DRUJ is now stable through full ROM, I proceed with below-elbow cast in neutral for 6 weeks. If still unstable, I proceed to DRUJ reconstruction.\n\n**Third — DRUJ reconstruction if still unstable**: Options depend on the state of the TFCC and the DRUJ articular surfaces:\n- If the TFCC is repairable and the DRUJ is congruent without arthritis: open TFCC repair with capsular plication\n- If the TFCC is irreparable but the DRUJ is not arthritic: DRUJ ligament reconstruction using a palmaris longus or gracilis tendon graft (Adams-Berger technique — reconstructs the volar and dorsal radioulnar ligaments through bone tunnels in the radius and ulna)\n- If there is ulnar abutment syndrome (positive ulnar variance causing ulnar impaction on the lunate): combine ulnar shortening osteotomy with the above\n- If DRUJ arthritis has already developed: salvage procedures — Sauve-Kapandji (radioulnar arthrodesis with ulnar pseudarthrosis) or Darrach resection (distal ulnar excision) in lower-demand patients\n\n**Prognosis**: Chronic DRUJ instability after malunion is a complex revision problem. The outcome is less predictable than primary treatment. Patients should be counselled that some loss of forearm rotation and grip strength is likely even with optimal reconstruction. The key to avoiding this situation is primary prevention — careful intraoperative assessment of DRUJ stability and accepting nothing less than anatomic radial reduction with correct ulnar variance at the index procedure.
Exam day cheat sheet
Galeazzi Fracture ORIF — Exam Day Summary

References

Evidence

Galeazzi fracture-dislocations

Level IV
Mikic ZD
Clinical implication: ORIF became the standard of care for Galeazzi fractures in adults based on this landmark series.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57(8):1071-80
Evidence

Results of compression-plating of closed Galeazzi fractures

Level IV
Moore TM, Klein JP, Patzakis MJ, Harvey JP Jr
Clinical implication: Poor outcomes are almost always traceable to inadequate DRUJ treatment or radial malreduction.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(7):1015-21
Evidence

Galeazzi fracture-dislocation: a new treatment-oriented classification

Level IV
Rettig ME, Raskin KB
Clinical implication: The distance of the fracture from the joint is a reliable predictor of DRUJ disruption and guides treatment planning.
Source: J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26(2):228-35
Evidence

The interosseous membrane of the forearm: structure and its role in Galeazzi fractures

Level IV
Schneiderman G, Meldrum RD, Bloebaum RD, Tarr R, Sarmiento A
Clinical implication: Explains the biomechanical rationale for anatomic radial fixation: length restoration re-tensions the IOM, stabilising the DRUJ.
Source: J Trauma. 1993;35(6):879-85
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.