Guided Growth / Hemiepiphysiodesis (Tension-Band Plating)
Surgical technique guide for temporary hemiepiphysiodesis with tension-band plating (eight-Plate) for paediatric coronal and sagittal angular deformity - growth-plate principles, CORA planning, overcorrection avoidance, reversibility and rebound
Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team
Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow โข Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team
Temporary tethering of one side of an open physis to gradually correct angular deformity | intermediate
Surgical Imaging



Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
Insufficient Growth Remaining
The trap: Offering guided growth to a child near skeletal maturity. With little growth left there is no biological engine to drive correction โ the deformity persists and the family is misled.
The fix: Confirm meaningful growth remains โ bone age, Tanner staging, menarchal status, and physeal appearance. As a rule, allow at least 12-18 months of growth. If insufficient, plan a corrective osteotomy instead.
Overcorrection / Set-and-Forget
The trap: Inserting the plate and not following the child closely. The physis continues to be tethered after neutral alignment is reached and the limb deforms in the OPPOSITE direction.
The fix: Review every 3-4 months with standing long-leg alignment radiographs. Remove the plate PROMPTLY once the mechanical axis is neutral. Younger, fast-growing children overshoot quickly โ review them more frequently.
Screw Across the Physis
Location: Both screws must straddle the physis โ one purely in the epiphysis, one purely in the metaphysis. A screw that crosses the physeal cartilage acts like a transphyseal bar.
Risk: Crossing the physis causes a focal arrest and permanent deformity โ the opposite of the intended effect. Use intra-operative fluoroscopy in two planes to confirm both screws are clear of the physis.
Wrong Level โ Plan at the CORA
The trap: Plating the proximal tibia for a deformity whose apex (CORA) is at the distal femur, or vice versa, leaves the true deformity uncorrected and creates a secondary translational deformity.
The fix: Obtain standing long-leg radiographs, measure mLDFA and MPTA, identify the CORA, and place the plate over the physis responsible for the deformity (femoral, tibial, or both for combined deformity).
Rebound After Removal
Why it happens: Younger children with substantial growth remaining can rebound (partial recurrence) after hardware removal, especially in pathological physes (Blount, rickets, dysplasia).
Implications: Counsel families that a second episode of guided growth may be needed. Consider deliberate mild overcorrection in conditions with a high rebound tendency, and continue follow-up after removal until maturity.
Pathological vs Idiopathic Physis
Idiopathic genu valgum/varum: Healthy physis responds predictably and relatively quickly to tethering.
Blount, rickets, skeletal dysplasia: Abnormal/stiff physes respond slowly and unpredictably, with higher failure, slower correction and higher rebound. Optimise metabolic disease (rickets) before and during treatment.
G.R.O.W.T.HGROWTH โ Prerequisites and Principles of Guided Growth
T.E.T.H.E.RTETHER โ Assessing the Angular Deformity
Surgical Indications
Absolute / Strong Indications
- Progressive pathological angular deformity (genu valgum or varum) with significant growth remaining
- Mechanical axis deviation beyond physiological limits for age, causing symptoms or progression
- Blount disease (infantile and adolescent tibia vara) with an open, viable physis
- Metabolic/rachitic deformity (e.g. hypophosphataemic rickets) once medical control is optimised
- Sagittal-plane deformity โ fixed knee flexion (anterior distal femoral plating) in cerebral palsy / dysplasia
Relative Indications
- Post-traumatic partial physeal injury producing progressive angulation (with sufficient remaining physis)
- Skeletal dysplasia (e.g. achondroplasia, multiple epiphyseal dysplasia) with symptomatic malalignment
- Asymmetric deformity at multiple levels (combined femoral and tibial plating)
- Mild leg-length asymmetry combined with angular deformity (deformity-led correction)
Contraindications
Absolute:
- Closed or near-closed physis / skeletal maturity โ no growth engine; perform an osteotomy instead
- Active infection at the operative site
Relative:
- Physiological genu valgum/varum (normal developmental variant โ observe; valgum peaks ~3-4 years)
- Uncontrolled metabolic bone disease (correct rickets first โ physis will not respond reliably)
- Very stiff/abnormal physis (severe Blount, bar) where response is unpredictable โ counsel on slower correction and rebound
Key Principle โ Growth Modulation, Not Correction at Surgery
Guided growth does not acutely correct deformity. It tethers one side of an open physis (the convex/longer side over the deformity apex) so that the untethered side continues to grow, gradually swinging the limb back towards a neutral mechanical axis. The correction is therefore biological and time-dependent, proportional to the growth rate of the involved physis and the remaining growth.
Evidence Base
Tension-Band Plating (Stevens)
- Stevens PM (2007): Original prospective description of the non-locking extraperiosteal two-hole tension-band plate ("eight-Plate") for guided growth โ a flexible construct that relies on the tension-band principle rather than physeal compression, hinging open as growth proceeds. 32 of 34 patients corrected to neutral, correction roughly 30% faster than stapling, with no permanent growth arrests.
- The flexible construct avoids the compression across the whole physis seen with staples, theoretically reducing the risk of permanent physeal arrest and allowing the physis to recover after removal.
Tension-Band Plate vs Blount Staple
- Blount & Clarke (1949): Original description of physeal stapling for growth control โ historically the standard, but associated with implant extrusion, breakage, migration and unintended permanent arrest.
- Comparative series report lower implant failure and extrusion and a more reversible effect with tension-band plates than with rigid staples; Stevens & Klatt directly documented 45% staple migration and 41% rebound, contrasted with no migration in the plate cohort. This is why plating has largely superseded stapling for temporary hemiepiphysiodesis.
Idiopathic vs Pathological Physes
- Idiopathic genu valgum/varum corrects predictably and relatively quickly (Ballal et al. reported correction faster in children under 10 years).
- Blount, rickets and skeletal dysplasia correct more slowly, less completely, and rebound more often โ patients require closer surveillance and counselling about repeat procedures. In early-onset Blount disease, tension-band plating nonetheless improved Langenskiold stage and mechanical-axis alignment in most limbs and is now advocated as first-line surgical treatment.
Guided growth for angular correction: a preliminary series using a tension band plate
Correcting genu varum and genu valgum in children by guided growth: temporary hemiepiphysiodesis using tension band plates
Guided growth for pathological physes: radiographic improvement during realignment
The effect of guided growth surgery on Langenskiold stage and mechanical axis in early-onset Blount disease
Temporary Hemiepiphysiodesis โ Tension-Band Plate vs Staple vs Permanent vs Osteotomy
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Use these scenarios to practise clinical reasoning and management decisions
"An 8-year-old girl is referred with progressive, symptomatic genu valgum of the right knee. Standing long-leg radiographs show the mechanical axis lateral to the knee with an abnormal mLDFA and a normal MPTA. There is no metabolic disease. How would you manage her?"
"What is the difference between temporary hemiepiphysiodesis with a tension-band plate and a permanent epiphysiodesis, and why does the choice of implant (plate versus the older Blount staple) matter?"
"A 6-year-old boy with hypophosphataemic rickets had bilateral medial distal femoral tension-band plates inserted 18 months ago and was lost to follow-up. He now returns with the knees deformed in the OPPOSITE direction (varus) and one screw appears broken. What has happened and how do you manage him?"
Guided Growth / Hemiepiphysiodesis (Tension-Band Plating) โ Exam Day Summary
Clinical summary
References
-
Stevens PM (2007). Guided growth for angular correction: a preliminary series using a tension band plate. J Pediatr Orthop 27(3):253-9. PMID 17414005. DOI 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31803433a1. โ Original description of the tension-band ("eight-Plate") technique; flexible extraperiosteal construct with reliable correction (32/34 to neutral, ~30% faster than staples) and no permanent growth arrests.
-
Blount WP, Clarke GR (1949). Control of bone growth by epiphyseal stapling: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 31A(3):464-78. โ Original description of physeal stapling for growth control; the historical comparator superseded by tension-band plating.
-
Stevens PM, Klatt JB (2008). Guided growth for pathological physes: radiographic improvement during realignment. J Pediatr Orthop 28(6):632-9. PMID 18724199. DOI 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181841fda. โ Evidence that pathological (rachitic) physes correct but rebound substantially (41% with staples); flexible plates show lower migration than staples.
-
Ballal MS, Bruce CE, Nayagam S (2010). Correcting genu varum and genu valgum in children by guided growth: temporary hemiepiphysiodesis using tension band plates. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(2):273-6. PMID 20130322. DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.92B2.22937. โ Clinical series confirming effectiveness for coronal deformity, faster correction under 10 years, and reversibility (no permanent tethers).
-
Hanstein R, Schneble CA, Schulz JF, et al. (2023). The effect of guided growth surgery on Langenskiold stage and mechanical axis in early-onset Blount disease. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 32(5):e240-e250. PMID 37852243. DOI 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00515. โ Tension-band plating improved Langenskiold stage in 84% and is advocated as first-line surgical treatment for early-onset Blount disease.
-
Paley D (2002). Principles of Deformity Correction. Springer. โ Reference text on CORA-based deformity analysis (mechanical axis, mLDFA, MPTA) underpinning level selection for guided growth.