Balloon Kyphoplasty

SpineIntermediateCore Procedure

Balloon Kyphoplasty

Surgical technique guide for balloon kyphoplasty in painful vertebral compression fractures — bilateral transpedicular approach, cavity creation with inflatable bone tamp, low-pressure PMMA cement delivery, height restoration and kyphosis correction

High-yield overview

Bilateral transpedicular vertebral augmentation with inflatable bone tamp and PMMA cement for painful osteoporotic or pathological compression fractures | intermediate

Surgical Imaging

Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
Pedicle Breach — Medial

The trap: A medial pedicle breach during cannula placement allows the trocar to enter the spinal canal and injure the thecal sac or cord.

The fix: Use true AP and lateral fluoroscopy throughout. On AP view the medial pedicle wall must remain lateral to the medial border of the pedicle shadow until the cannula has passed the posterior wall. Any medial deviation requires immediate redirection.

Cement Leakage — Posterior Wall

Location: The posterior vertebral wall is the critical barrier; breach allows cement to enter the canal and compress neural elements.

Risk: Posterior wall fracture lines or tumour erosion are common in pathological fractures. Continuous lateral fluoroscopy during cement injection is mandatory; any posterior extravasation requires immediate stoppage.

Cement Leakage — Venous

Location: Basivertebral veins and segmental veins communicate directly with the vertebral body; cement can travel to the vena cava and cause pulmonary embolism.

Risk: High-pressure injection or low-viscosity cement increases venous filling. Use higher-viscosity PMMA after cavity creation and inject slowly under real-time imaging; stop if any venous opacification appears.

Endplate Fracture During Tamp Inflation

Deformity pattern: Over-aggressive balloon inflation in severely osteoporotic bone can fracture the superior or inferior endplate rather than elevate it.

Implication: This creates a direct pathway for cement leakage into the disc space and may worsen kyphosis. Inflate the tamp gradually in 0.5 mL increments while monitoring endplate position on lateral fluoroscopy.

Adjacent-Level Fracture

Why different: Kyphoplasty alters load transfer through the stiffened augmented vertebra; the adjacent levels experience increased stress.

Implications: New fractures occur in 10-20 percent of patients within 1 year. Optimise osteoporosis pharmacotherapy (bisphosphonates, denosumab or anabolic agents) and consider prophylactic augmentation only in highly selected cases with multiple levels at risk.

Pulmonary Cement Embolism

Kanavel equivalent signs: Sudden desaturation, hypotension or chest pain during or immediately after cement injection.

Management: Immediate cessation of injection, supportive ventilation, urgent CT pulmonary angiogram. Most small emboli are asymptomatic but larger fragments require endovascular retrieval or anticoagulation decisions in consultation with interventional radiology and respiratory teams.

Mnemonic

K.Y.P.H.OKYPHOPLASTY — Patient Selection and Safety

Mnemonic

T.A.M.PTAMP — Operative Sequence

Surgical Indications

Absolute Indications

  • Painful vertebral compression fracture with mechanical axial pain correlating to the fractured level
  • Subacute fracture (typically less than 3 months) demonstrating bone marrow oedema on MRI STIR or T2 fat-suppressed sequences
  • Failure of conservative management including analgesia, bracing and physiotherapy for at least 4-6 weeks
  • Pathological fractures due to myeloma, lymphoma or metastatic disease with mechanical pain and limited life expectancy where stabilisation improves quality of life

Relative Indications

  • Progressive kyphosis with sagittal imbalance and secondary pain
  • Multiple contiguous fractures where staged augmentation may prevent further collapse
  • Patients with severe osteoporosis in whom prolonged bracing is poorly tolerated

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Active spinal infection or osteomyelitis at the target level
  • Neurological deficit attributable to the fracture (cord or cauda equina compression requiring decompression)
  • Burst fracture with significant retropulsion and canal compromise
  • Coagulopathy that cannot be corrected

Relative:

  • Chronic fracture without oedema on MRI (pain relief rates drop below 50 percent)
  • Greater than 50 percent vertebral height loss with severe endplate fragmentation (technical difficulty)
  • Allergy to PMMA cement components

Evidence Base

Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty both provide rapid pain relief in appropriately selected patients. The key distinction is that kyphoplasty creates a cavity with the inflatable bone tamp before cement injection. This permits use of higher-viscosity cement at lower pressure and aims for partial height restoration and kyphosis correction.

Landmark trials (FREE, VERTOS II, KAST) demonstrated significant pain and function improvement versus conservative care at 1 month, with benefits persisting to 12-24 months in many patients. Direct comparisons with vertebroplasty show similar pain scores but modestly greater height restoration and kyphosis correction with kyphoplasty, at the cost of slightly longer operative time. Cement leakage rates are lower with kyphoplasty (approximately 5-10 percent versus 20-30 percent in vertebroplasty) but are not eliminated. Adjacent-level fracture rates are comparable between the two techniques.

Kyphoplasty versus Vertebroplasty — Evidence Summary


Key Evidence

Evidence

Balloon kyphoplasty versus non-surgical fracture management for treatment of painful vertebral body compression fractures

Level I
Wardlaw D, Cummings SR, Van Meirhaeghe J, Bastian L, Tillman JB, Ranstam J, Eastell R, Shabe P, Talmadge K, Boonen SLancet
Clinical implication: Kyphoplasty provides clinically meaningful early pain and function gains over conservative care in selected patients with acute painful fractures.
Source: Lancet 2009;373(9668):1016-24
Evidence

Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VERTOS II)

Level I
Klazen CA, Lohle PN, de Vries J, Jansen FH, Tielbeek AV, Blonk MC, Venmans A, van Rooij WJ, Schoemaker MC, Juttmann JR, Lo TH, Verhaar HJ, van Dijk L, van Vliet M, de Beus J, Mali WPLancet
Clinical implication: Vertebral augmentation (both techniques) accelerates pain relief compared with conservative management alone.
Evidence

Kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

Level I
Liu JT, Liao WJ, Tan WC, Lee JK, Liu CH, Chen YH, Lin TBJ Clin Neurosci
Clinical implication: When height restoration is a goal (subacute fractures with correctable deformity), kyphoplasty offers a modest mechanical advantage over vertebroplasty.
Evidence

Safety and efficacy of balloon kyphoplasty at 2 years: a meta-analysis

Level II
Taylor RS, Taylor RJ, Fritzell PSpine
Clinical implication: Long-term pain relief is durable; major neurological complications are rare when performed under imaging guidance.

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

A 72-year-old woman with known osteoporosis presents with 8 weeks of severe mechanical mid-thoracic pain after a minor fall. MRI shows a T8 compression fracture with bone marrow oedema. She has failed bracing and analgesia. How do you decide whether balloon kyphoplasty is appropriate and what are the key technical points?

Practical approach
This patient meets standard criteria for balloon kyphoplasty: subacute osteoporotic compression fracture with mechanical pain correlating to the level and clear MRI oedema. I would proceed after confirming no contraindications (no infection, no neurological deficit, no burst component). **Pre-operative assessment**: Standing radiographs to quantify kyphosis and height loss. MRI already confirms oedema. DEXA and osteoporosis treatment review. Consent specifically covering cement leakage, adjacent fracture risk and the need for ongoing medical management of osteoporosis. **Operative plan**: Prone positioning with slight extension. True AP and lateral fluoroscopy. Bilateral transpedicular Jamshidi needle placement with continuous imaging to avoid medial breach. Advance to posterior third of body, then insert inflatable bone tamps. Inflate gradually under lateral view to elevate endplates (typical 2-4 mL per side). Create cavity, then inject high-viscosity PMMA under continuous lateral fluoroscopy until the anterior two-thirds to three-quarters of the body is filled. Stop at any sign of posterior or venous extravasation. **Post-operative**: Mobilise same day. Optimise osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. Standing radiographs at 6 weeks to assess alignment and screen for adjacent fractures.
Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

During balloon inflation at L1 you notice on lateral fluoroscopy that the superior endplate is fracturing rather than elevating. What do you do?

Practical approach
I would immediately stop inflation. Aggressive balloon inflation in severely osteoporotic bone can fracture the endplate rather than reduce the fracture, creating a direct pathway for cement leakage into the disc space. **Immediate actions**: Deflate the tamp. Reassess the situation on AP and lateral views. Accept that height restoration will be modest. Proceed to cement injection with extra caution, using even higher-viscosity cement and lower final fill volume. Watch carefully for disc-space extravasation. **Rationale**: The primary goal is pain relief and stabilisation, not perfect radiographic correction. Creating an endplate defect increases leakage risk and may accelerate adjacent degeneration. In very osteoporotic bone it is safer to achieve modest correction than to push for maximal height.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

You are performing kyphoplasty at T12 in a patient with myeloma. During cement injection on the right side you see immediate posterior extravasation on lateral fluoroscopy. The patient is under general anaesthesia. What is your response?

Practical approach
I would stop injection immediately. Posterior wall breach in a pathological fracture is a recognised risk when tumour has eroded the cortex. **Immediate management**: Leave the cannula in place to tamponade further leakage. Perform urgent neurological examination as the patient emerges from anaesthesia. Obtain immediate CT to assess the volume and location of cement in the canal. If there is no neurological deficit and the cement is a thin layer without mass effect, close observation with serial examinations is reasonable. If there is a deficit or clear cord compression, urgent surgical decompression (laminectomy and cement removal) is required in consultation with the spinal surgery team. **Prevention learning point**: In pathological fractures with known posterior wall erosion, consider pre-procedure CT to map the defect, use smaller cement volumes, and have a lower threshold to stop injection. Some surgeons prefer vertebroplasty with even higher viscosity in these cases, or combined stabilisation.
Exam day cheat sheet
Balloon Kyphoplasty — Exam Day Summary

References

Evidence

Balloon kyphoplasty versus non-surgical fracture management for treatment of painful vertebral body compression fractures

Level I
Wardlaw D, Cummings SR, Van Meirhaeghe J, Bastian L, Tillman JB, Ranstam J, Eastell R, Shabe P, Talmadge K, Boonen SLancet
Evidence

Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VERTOS II)

Level I
Klazen CA, Lohle PN, de Vries J, Jansen FH, Tielbeek AV, Blonk MC, Venmans A, van Rooij WJ, Schoemaker MC, Juttmann JR, Lo TH, Verhaar HJ, van Dijk L, van Vliet M, de Beus J, Mali WPLancet
Evidence

Kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

Level I
Liu JT, Liao WJ, Tan WC, Lee JK, Liu CH, Chen YH, Lin TBJ Clin Neurosci
Evidence

Safety and efficacy of balloon kyphoplasty at 2 years: a meta-analysis

Level II
Taylor RS, Taylor RJ, Fritzell PSpine
Evidence

Adjacent vertebral fracture after balloon kyphoplasty: a biomechanical and clinical analysis

Level III
Berlemann U, Ferguson SJ, Nolte LP, Heini PFSpine
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.