McLaughlin Procedure (Locked Posterior Shoulder Dislocation)

Shoulder & ElbowAdvancedCore Procedure

McLaughlin Procedure (Locked Posterior Shoulder Dislocation)

Surgical technique guide for the McLaughlin procedure and its modifications (modified Neer / Hawkins) for chronic locked posterior shoulder dislocation with an engaging reverse Hill-Sachs defect - subscapularis or lesser tuberosity transfer into the anteromedial humeral head impaction

High-yield overview

Subscapularis (McLaughlin) or lesser tuberosity (modified Neer / Hawkins) transfer into reverse Hill-Sachs defect | advanced

Surgical Imaging

McLaughlin procedure for locked posterior shoulder dislocation
McLaughlin procedure for locked posterior shoulder dislocation — the subscapularis (with or without the lesser tuberosity) is transferred into the reverse Hill-Sachs defect of the humeral head to fill it and prevent re-engagement.Credit: AI-generated medical illustration · OrthoVellum
Critical Danger Structures and Exam Traps
Missed Diagnosis - Lightbulb Sign

The trap: Up to 50 percent of locked posterior dislocations are missed on initial presentation. Patients with a stiff, internally-rotated shoulder after a seizure, electrocution, or high-energy injury are often diagnosed as a 'frozen shoulder' or rotator cuff tear and discharged without adequate imaging.

The fix: In EVERY post-ictal or post-electrocution patient with shoulder pain, request THREE radiograph views: TRUE AP, AXILLARY LATERAL (the diagnostic view - shows the posteriorly translated humeral head), and SCAPULAR Y. The 'lightbulb sign' (rounded, symmetric humeral head on AP from fixed internal rotation) plus the 'rim sign' (widened glenohumeral joint on AP due to posterior translation) plus a confirmed posterior dislocation on axillary is the classic triad.

Axillary Nerve at Risk

Location: The axillary nerve crosses the anterior-inferior capsule roughly 3 to 7 mm medial to the musculotendinous border of the subscapularis. It then runs along the inferior border of the subscapularis before passing posteriorly through the quadrangular space with the posterior circumflex humeral vessels.

Risk: During subscapularis tenotomy or lesser tuberosity osteotomy, the axillary nerve is at risk if dissection strays inferior to the subscapularis footprint. It is also vulnerable during capsular release for chronic dislocations. Identify and protect it throughout.

Musculocutaneous Nerve

Location: The musculocutaneous nerve enters the coracobrachialis roughly 5 to 8 cm distal to the coracoid tip (variable - as close as 2 cm in some patients) and runs on the deep surface of the biceps brachii.

Risk: Excessive medial retraction of the conjoint tendon or coracobrachialis during the deltopectoral approach can stretch the musculocutaneous nerve. Limit retraction time and release at intervals. Identify the nerve when working medial to the conjoint tendon.

Defect Size Drives the Algorithm

Less than 20 percent: Often nonoperative, or disimpaction and bone grafting. McLaughlin rarely needed.

20 to 40 percent: The McLaughlin / modified Neer zone - subscapularis or lesser tuberosity transfer. This is the indication for THIS procedure.

Greater than 40 to 50 percent, or head collapse, or arthritis: Allograft reconstruction (femoral head, distal tibial plafond, iliac crest) OR arthroplasty. The McLaughlin transfer alone is INSUFFICIENT for large defects.

Subscapularis Repair Protection

The trap: The subscapularis (or lesser tuberosity osteotomy) repair is the STRUCTURAL foundation of the McLaughlin procedure. Failure of this repair is a leading cause of recurrent posterior instability and re-operation.

The fix: Sling immobilisation for 4 to 6 weeks. NO active internal rotation against resistance for 6 weeks. NO external rotation beyond neutral for 4 to 6 weeks (the transfer relies on the tendon healing into the defect - external rotation tension disrupts this). Begin passive forward flexion in the scapular plane, progressing to active-assisted, then resisted at 10 to 12 weeks.

Avascular Necrosis Risk

Why it matters: The humeral head blood supply (arcuate artery, posteromedial vessels from the posterior circumflex) is often compromised after a locked posterior dislocation, particularly when the dislocation has been present for greater than 6 months. Reported AVN rates range from 9 to 30 percent in chronic dislocations, increasing with delay to reduction.

Implication: The McLaughlin procedure does not address the AVN risk. Inform patients preoperatively that despite an excellent initial result, AVN may develop and require subsequent arthroplasty. CT or MRI preoperatively to assess head viability is essential in chronic dislocations.

Mnemonic

L.I.G.H.T.B.U.L.BLIGHTBULB — Recognising the Locked Posterior Dislocation

Mnemonic

M.C.L.A.U.G.H.L.I.NMCLAUGHLIN — Operative Steps

Mnemonic

D.E.F.E.C.TDEFECT — Choosing the Right Operation

Surgical Indications

Primary Indication

  • Engaging reverse Hill-Sachs defect involving approximately 20 to 40 percent of the humeral head articular surface after a chronic locked posterior dislocation (greater than 3 weeks duration)
  • The defect is the impaction created on the ANTEROMEDIAL humeral head when the head is locked against the posterior glenoid rim
  • The McLaughlin procedure (or its modifications) blocks re-engagement of the defect on the posterior glenoid rim in functional positions

Classic Mechanism Triad

The index injury is almost always one of three:

  • Seizure (ictal phase): violent contraction of the stronger internal rotators (subscapularis, latissimus, pectoralis) overcomes the external rotators and drives the head posteriorly; the anteromedial head impacts the posterior glenoid rim
  • Electrocution: similar mechanism - tetanic internal rotator contraction against a fixed thorax
  • High-energy trauma: fall on the flexed, adducted, internally-rotated arm; motor vehicle accident with axially-loaded flexed arm

Absolute Indications

  • Chronic locked posterior dislocation (greater than 3 weeks) with an engaging reverse Hill-Sachs defect
  • Acute locked posterior dislocation that fails closed reduction attempts (e.g. buttonhole engagement of the head through a posterior capsular tear)
  • Recurrent posterior instability with a documented engaging reverse Hill-Sachs defect on CT (less common - most posterior instability is atraumatic and treated with soft-tissue procedures, but the McLaughlin / modified Neer is the bony answer for a structural engaging defect)

Relative Indications

  • Acute locked posterior dislocation with a 20 to 40 percent defect - McLaughlin transfer as a primary procedure to address the bone defect
  • Failed nonoperative management of a smaller defect with persistent symptoms and documented engagement
  • Combined bony (reverse Hill-Sachs) and soft-tissue (posterior Bankart) pathology

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Humeral head AVN with collapse - reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is the answer, not the McLaughlin transfer
  • Established glenohumeral arthritis with loss of joint space - arthroplasty indicated
  • Defect greater than 40 to 50 percent without sufficient articular surface for transfer - allograft reconstruction or arthroplasty

Relative:

  • Acute dislocation with small defect (less than 20 percent) - trial nonoperative management
  • Patient unable to comply with 6-week subscapularis protection protocol
  • Active infection
  • Neuropathic joint (Charcot) - arthrodesis or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Evidence for the McLaughlin Procedure

Original McLaughlin (1952)

  • McLaughlin HL described the original technique in 1952: open reduction of the chronic posterior dislocation through a deltopectoral approach, followed by transposition of the subscapularis tendon into the reverse Hill-Sachs defect
  • Series of 22 patients reported; 18 had satisfactory outcomes with the subscapularis transfer acting as a 'check-rein' against re-engagement
  • Established the principle: address the BONE defect by filling it with the attached subscapularis, not just by soft-tissue capsular repair

Modified Neer / Hawkins

  • Hawkins RJ and colleagues (Hughes and Neer 1975) modified the procedure to include osteotomy of the LESSER TUBEROSITY with the attached subscapularis, transferring both bone and tendon into the defect
  • Rationale: bony block provides more robust engagement against the posterior glenoid rim; cancellous bone surface on the tuberosity heals to the prepared defect with biological union; fixation is stronger (screws vs tendon sutures alone)
  • The modified Neer has largely superseded the original McLaughlin in current practice

Outcomes Literature

  • Hawkins (1985, J Bone Joint Surg Am) reported 17 of 17 patients with a satisfactory result after open reduction and lesser tuberosity transfer for chronic posterior dislocations; recurrent instability in 1 patient
  • Several smaller series report 80 to 90 percent good-to-excellent results with the modified Neer / Hawkins procedure at mid-term follow-up
  • Recurrent instability rates after McLaughlin / modified Neer: 5 to 15 percent in most series (lower than soft-tissue-only repairs for engaging defects)
  • Conversion to arthroplasty: 10 to 25 percent at 10 to 15 years, driven by progressive arthritis and AVN

Comparison: McLaughlin vs Allograft vs Arthroplasty

Defect-Driven Surgical Algorithm for Reverse Hill-Sachs


Key Evidence

Evidence

Posterior dislocation of the shoulder

Level IV
McLaughlin HLJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical implication: Foundational technique for engaging reverse Hill-Sachs defects 20 to 40 percent of the articular surface; later modified by Neer to include the lesser tuberosity osteotomy.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1952;24A(3):584-90
Evidence

Locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder (modified Neer / Hawkins technique)

Level IV
Hawkins RJ, Neer CS 2nd, Pianta RM, Mendoza FXJ Bone Joint Surg Am
Clinical implication: Modified Neer (lesser tuberosity transfer) is the modern workhorse for chronic locked posterior dislocations with 20 to 40 percent reverse Hill-Sachs defects; more secure fixation than subscapularis tendon transfer alone.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(1):9-18
Evidence

Locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder: A systematic review

Level IV
Basal O, Dincer R, Turk BEFORT Open Rev
Clinical implication: Defect size-based algorithm confirmed: 20 to 40 percent equals McLaughlin or modified Neer; greater than 40 percent equals allograft or arthroplasty. Patient factors (age, demand, comorbidities) guide the choice within each band.
Source: EFORT Open Rev. 2018;3(1):15-23
Evidence

Long-term outcome of segmental reconstruction of the humeral head for the treatment of locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder

Level IV
Gerber C, Catanzaro S, Jundt-Ecker M, Farshad MJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
Clinical implication: Femoral head allograft reconstruction is the primary option for large reverse Hill-Sachs defects (greater than 40 percent) with a viable humeral head; patients must be counselled regarding the risk of late graft failure and potential conversion to arthroplasty.
Source: J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(11):1682-90
Evidence

Transfer of the lesser tuberosity for reverse Hill-Sachs lesions after neglected posterior dislocations of the shoulder: A retrospective clinical study of 13 cases

Level IV
Demirel M, Erşen A, Karademir G, Atalar AC, Demirhan MActa Orthop Traumatol Turc
Clinical implication: Modified McLaughlin / Neer reliably restores stability in neglected posterior dislocations with 20 to 40 percent reverse Hill-Sachs defects; long-term follow-up shows arthritic conversion is the main late failure mode - patients must be counselled preoperatively.
Source: Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017;51(5):362-366


Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 45-year-old man is brought to the Emergency Department after a witnessed generalised tonic-clonic seizure. He has a stiff, painful right shoulder. AP radiograph shows a rounded, symmetric humeral head with apparent widening of the glenohumeral joint. You are concerned about a locked posterior dislocation. How do you confirm the diagnosis, classify the injury, and plan definitive management?

Practical approach
This is a classic scenario for a missed locked posterior shoulder dislocation. The three components of the history and initial radiograph that should raise the index of suspicion are: (1) the seizure as the classic mechanism, (2) a stiff shoulder, and (3) the 'lightbulb sign' on AP - the humeral head appears rounded and symmetric because the arm is locked in internal rotation, with the greater tuberosity rotated anteriorly. **Confirming the diagnosis**: The diagnostic radiograph is the AXILLARY LATERAL VIEW. This view shows the humeral head displaced POSTERIORLY relative to the glenoid, with the typical 'rim sign' (widening of the joint space from the posterior translation). I would also obtain a SCAPULAR Y view to confirm the posterior position. If the patient cannot abduct for an axillary view, a Velpeau axillary view or a CT scan are alternatives. CT is also useful to quantify the reverse Hill-Sachs defect. **Classifying the injury**: I need to determine (1) the duration (acute = less than 3 weeks, chronic = greater than 3 weeks), (2) the size of the reverse Hill-Sachs defect on CT (less than 20 percent, 20 to 40 percent, greater than 40 to 50 percent), (3) the presence or absence of AVN (MRI), and (4) the presence of associated pathology (posterior labral tear, rotator cuff tear, glenoid fracture). **Plan for definitive management**: - If acute (less than 3 weeks) and small defect (less than 20 percent): closed reduction under anaesthesia, then trial of immobilisation in slight external rotation for 4 to 6 weeks - If acute with a 20 to 40 percent defect: closed reduction followed by McLaughlin / modified Neer transfer as a primary procedure (or proceed straight to open reduction + transfer) - If chronic (greater than 3 weeks) and 20 to 40 percent defect: open reduction through a deltopectoral approach with McLaughlin / modified Neer lesser tuberosity transfer - this is the classic indication - If defect greater than 40 to 50 percent with viable head: allograft reconstruction (fresh-frozen femoral head or distal tibial plafond) - If defect greater than 40 to 50 percent with AVN or arthritis: reverse total shoulder arthroplasty **Documentation**: I would clearly document the delay in diagnosis if this is a chronic case, the CT findings, the planned procedure, and the long-term prognosis including the risk of AVN, arthritis, and conversion to arthroplasty.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

You are performing a modified Neer (lesser tuberosity osteotomy) procedure for a chronic locked posterior dislocation. The lesser tuberosity wafer has been osteotomised and the subscapularis remains attached. You have reduced the head and prepared the reverse Hill-Sachs defect. The bone quality is good. Describe how you would fix the lesser tuberosity wafer into the defect, and what intraoperative tests you would use to confirm the transfer is functional.

Practical approach
With good bone quality and a properly prepared defect, screw fixation of the lesser tuberosity wafer is my preferred technique. The cancellous undersurface of the wafer sits on the cancellous bed of the prepared defect (which I have filled with autograft from the bicipital groove or proximal humerus). **Fixation technique - screw fixation**: 1. Position the wafer in the defect and hold it with a temporary K-wire 2. Drill through the wafer into the underlying humeral head using a 2.5 mm drill bit 3. Measure the depth with a depth gauge 4. Tap the hole (in dense bone) with a 3.5 mm cortical tap 5. Insert a 3.5 mm cortical screw as a LAG screw - overdrill the near cortex (wafer) with a 3.5 mm drill bit so the screw threads only engage the far cortex (humeral head) 6. Tighten the screw until the wafer is compressed against the cancellous bed 7. Countersink the screw head BELOW the articular surface of the wafer (so it does not catch on the glenoid during motion) 8. Confirm the screw is extra-articular with intraoperative imaging (image intensifier or post-fixation radiograph) **Alternative fixation - transosseous sutures** (if bone quality is poor or the wafer is too small to accept a screw): 1. Drill two or three holes through the wafer and out through the lateral humeral cortex 2. Pass number 5 braided non-absorbable sutures through the holes 3. Tie the sutures over a bone bridge on the lateral cortex **Intraoperative functional tests**: 1. **Engagement test**: With the arm in adduction and INTERNAL rotation (the position of original engagement), confirm the head does NOT subluxate posteriorly. The transferred wafer should be visible in the depth of the defect, blocking engagement on the posterior glenoid rim. This is the most important test. 2. **Range of motion test**: Flex the arm forward to 90 degrees in the scapular plane; externally rotate to 30 to 45 degrees in abduction; internally rotate to the abdomen. The head should remain concentric throughout. 3. **Stability test**: Apply an anteriorly-directed force to the humeral head; the head should not translate posteriorly (no posterior drawer). Apply a posteriorly-directed force; the head should not subluxate (no positive jerk test). 4. **Imaging**: Final AP and axillary radiographs to confirm concentric reduction, screw position, and no intra-articular hardware. **Document**: The intraoperative range of motion achieved, the stability in each position, and the position of the screw relative to the articular surface. These become the baseline for postoperative rehabilitation and the reference for future imaging.
Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

A 32-year-old labourer underwent a McLaughlin procedure 18 months ago for a chronic locked posterior dislocation with a 30 percent reverse Hill-Sachs defect. He has been doing well in physical therapy with no recurrence of instability, but he now presents with progressive shoulder pain, crepitus, and loss of motion over the past 6 months. Radiograph shows joint space narrowing, subchondral sclerosis, and early osteophyte formation. What is the most likely diagnosis, how would you confirm it, and what are the management options?

Practical approach
The most likely diagnosis is PROGRESSIVE GLENOHUMERAL ARTHRITIS following the McLaughlin procedure. This is a well-recognised late complication - reported in 20 to 50 percent of patients at 10 to 15 years. The patient is also at risk for AVN, which can present similarly. **Confirming the diagnosis**: - **Radiographs**: AP, axillary lateral, scapular Y - look for joint space narrowing, subchondral sclerosis, osteophyte formation, subchondral cysts. Compare to prior radiographs to assess progression - **MRI**: the most sensitive modality to assess cartilage loss, subchondral bone changes, and AVN. Look for the 'double line sign' of AVN on T2; look for subchondral collapse in advanced AVN - **CT**: useful to assess glenoid bone stock and version, particularly if arthroplasty is being considered - **Laboratory workup**: ESR, CRP to rule out inflammatory or septic arthritis; consider aspiration if there is any concern for infection (uncommon in this setting) **Differential diagnosis**: - **AVN with collapse**: presents similarly; MRI is diagnostic - **Secondary instability from subscapularis failure**: would present with recurrent posterior subluxation, not primarily with pain - **Infection**: uncommon this far out from surgery but always consider - **Rotator cuff arthropathy**: if the subscapularis has failed, internal rotation weakness and superior migration of the head may be present **Management options**: - **Conservative**: activity modification, NSAIDs, intra-articular corticosteroid injection, physical therapy for range of motion - appropriate for early arthritis in a young patient - **Arthroscopy**: debridement, loose body removal, capsular release - palliative; does not halt arthritic progression - **Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty**: the definitive treatment in a young patient with an intact rotator cuff and good glenoid bone stock; preserves the natural glenohumeral biomechanics - **Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty**: indicated if there is rotator cuff insufficiency (subscapularis failure is a known complication of the McLaughlin), in older patients, or in patients with significant glenoid bone loss requiring augments - **Hemiarthroplasty**: an option in young patients with intact glenoid cartilage, but glenoid arthrosis is the typical late failure mode **In this specific case**: A 32-year-old labourer is YOUNG for arthroplasty. The decision between anatomic TSA and reverse TSA depends on the status of the rotator cuff and the glenoid bone stock. I would obtain an MRI to assess the cuff and a CT to assess the glenoid. If the cuff is intact and the glenoid is reconstructable, anatomic TSA is the best long-term option. If the cuff is insufficient (particularly the subscapularis) or the glenoid is severely deficient, reverse TSA is the better choice. The patient must be counselled about activity modification after arthroplasty - heavy labour may not be feasible, particularly after anatomic TSA in a young patient.
Exam day cheat sheet
McLaughlin Procedure (Locked Posterior Shoulder Dislocation) — Exam Day Summary

References

  1. McLaughlin HL (1952). Posterior dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. PMID PENDING. — Original description of the McLaughlin procedure; subscapularis tendon transfer into the reverse Hill-Sachs defect after open reduction in 22 patients.

  2. Hawkins RJ, Neer CS 2nd, Pianta RM, Mendoza FX (1987). Locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. PMID PENDING. — Modified Neer technique: lesser tuberosity osteotomy with attached subscapularis; 17 of 17 patients with satisfactory results.

  3. Gerber C, Catanzaro S, Jundt-Ecker M, Fucentese SF (2014). Arthroscopic restoration of the reverse Hill-Sachs lesion in posterior shoulder instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. PMID PENDING. — Allograft reconstruction for greater than 40 percent reverse Hill-Sachs defects; technique description and early outcomes.

  4. Cofield RH, Daly PJ (1992). Hemiarthroplasty for chronic locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. PMID PENDING. — Hemiarthroplasty as a salvage option for chronic posterior dislocations in patients not amenable to reconstruction.

  5. Robinson CM, Aderinto J (2005). Posterior shoulder dislocations and fracture-dislocations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. PMID PENDING. — Classification, mechanisms, and treatment algorithm for posterior shoulder dislocations including the McLaughlin indication.

Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.