Medial Approach to the Arm and Distal Humerus

TraumaAdvancedCore Procedure

Medial Approach to the Arm and Distal Humerus

Comprehensive operative guide to the medial approach to the arm (brachium) and distal humerus along the medial intermuscular septum - supine positioning, the true brachialis-triceps internervous plane, protection of the brachial artery, median nerve, ulnar nerve, basilic vein and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, vascular and nerve exploration, and limited fracture fixation for Orthopaedic exams

High-yield overview

Supine, arm abducted and externally rotated | true internervous plane | brachial neurovascular bundle access

Brachialis / TricepsTrue internervous plane along the medial intermuscular septum
Ulnar n.Pierces the medial intermuscular septum in the distal third
Brachial a.Explored in the medial sheath with the median nerve
LimitedRole for humeral shaft fracture fixation versus anterolateral
Critical Must-Knows
  • Supine position with the arm abducted approximately 90 degrees on an arm board and externally rotated swings the medial intermuscular septum into an accessible anterior position.
  • True internervous plane between brachialis (musculocutaneous nerve) anteriorly and triceps (radial nerve) posteriorly, along the medial intermuscular septum, so no muscle is denervated.
  • Brachial artery, median nerve and ulnar nerve form the neurovascular bundle and must each be identified and protected.
  • Basilic vein and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve are the key superficial structures in the medial groove.
  • Limited role for fracture fixation - the anterolateral or posterior approach is the workhorse for humeral shaft fractures.

When & Why

What it exposes. Henry's medial approach to the brachium exposes the medial humeral shaft and the brachial neurovascular bundle (brachial artery, median nerve and ulnar nerve) by developing the interval along the medial intermuscular septum between the biceps and brachialis anteriorly and the triceps posteriorly. It is the principal extensile route to the brachial artery in the arm and gives simultaneous access to the ulnar and median nerves. Why this approach is chosen. The medial aspect of the arm carries the brachial neurovascular bundle deep to the medial intermuscular septum. When pathology involves these structures - vascular injury, nerve compression, or medial cortical bone disease - the medial approach delivers direct and extensile access along a true internervous plane. For isolated humeral shaft fracture fixation it is a secondary option, because the anterolateral and posterior approaches provide better working room and radial nerve visualisation. Position & landmarks. Position the patient supine with the arm abducted approximately 90 degrees on a padded arm board or hand table and externally rotated, so the medial intermuscular septum faces the surgeon; apply a high-arm tourniquet and inflate after exsanguination. For distal ulnar nerve work, the arm across the chest with the elbow flexed is a practical alternative. Palpate the groove between biceps and triceps (overlying the medial intermuscular septum), the medial supracondylar ridge and medial epicondyle distally, and the deltopectoral groove proximally; mark the planned longitudinal incision along the medial border of the arm and the anticipated course of the basilic vein and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve. Confirm C-arm access from the opposite side when imaging is required.

Arm position determines access

Abduction and external rotation of the arm swings the medial intermuscular septum anteriorly so the surgeon works in a comfortable plane. If the procedure is primarily about the ulnar nerve at the elbow, supinating and flexing the elbow with the arm across the chest may be more practical. State your position and your reasoning in the viva.

Primary indications:

  • Exploration and repair of the brachial artery (penetrating vascular trauma, iatrogenic injury, or vascular compromise after supracondylar humerus fracture)
  • Ulnar nerve decompression or anterior transposition in cubital tunnel syndrome when extensile proximal release is required
  • Median nerve exploration in the arm (entrapment, traumatic injury, tumour)
  • Exposure of the medial humeral cortex for tumour resection or biopsy, chronic osteomyelitis, sequestrectomy, or medial-based delayed union and nonunion
  • Limited medial-column distal humerus fracture fixation where direct medial access is required
  • Concurrent vascular and skeletal procedures needing medial humeral and brachial vessel access through one incision Contraindications:
  • Most humeral shaft fractures (anterolateral or posterior approaches are preferred)
  • Compromised or heavily scarred medial-arm soft tissue from previous surgery or trauma
  • When broad posterior or lateral cortical visualisation is the primary goal
  • Poor soft-tissue envelope over the planned medial incision
Approach variants
VariantDescriptionBest use
Standard medial (Henry)Along the medial intermuscular septum between biceps-brachialis and tricepsMedial cortex, vascular and nerve access
Distal cubital extensionContinues to the medial epicondyle and cubital tunnelUlnar nerve decompression or transposition
Combined vascular exposureProximal extension toward the axilla with vascular surgeryBrachial artery repair

Alternative approaches:

  • Anterolateral approach (Henry) - workhorse for humeral shaft fracture fixation; exposes the radial nerve in the distal arm
  • Posterior approach - best for visualising the radial nerve in the spiral groove and for the posterior humeral shaft
  • Minimally invasive anterior plating - for select diaphyseal fractures
  • Functional (Sarmiento) bracing - non-operative management for the majority of closed humeral shaft fractures
Know when NOT to use the medial approach

The single most common error in the viva is over-using the medial approach for humeral shaft fractures. Most shaft fractures are managed non-operatively with a functional brace, and those needing fixation are better served by an anterolateral or posterior approach. Reserve the medial approach for vascular exploration, ulnar or median nerve work, and medial cortex pathology - and say so explicitly.

The Exposure

Work down through the layers along the medial border of the arm, protecting the basilic vein and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve superficially, then develop the true brachialis-triceps internervous plane on the medial intermuscular septum to reach the neurovascular sheath and the medial humeral cortex.

🦴
Image Needed: AnatomyHigh Priority

Cross-sectional or intra-operative illustration of the medial arm approach showing the longitudinal incision along the medial intermuscular septum, the basilic vein and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve protected in the subcutaneous layer, the brachialis-triceps internervous plane developed down to the medial humeral cortex, and the brachial artery, median nerve and ulnar nerve mobilised within the medial neurovascular sheath.

Context: A verified image is being sourced.

Pending image generation or sourcing

Dissection sequence

Step 1Incision along the medial intermuscular septum
  • Make a longitudinal incision along the medial border of the arm over the medial intermuscular septum, centred on the target level.
  • Extend as far proximally toward the axillary fold (or just distal to pectoralis major) or distally toward the medial epicondyle as the pathology dictates.
Step 2Identify and protect the basilic vein and MABC nerve
  • Incise skin and subcutaneous fat and identify the basilic vein and the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, which run together in the subcutaneous tissue of the medial groove.
  • Protect them where possible and ligate venous branches only as needed; injury to the cutaneous nerve causes a painful neuroma and medial forearm numbness.
Step 3Open the deep fascia
  • Incise the deep fascia in line with the skin incision over the groove between the biceps and brachialis anteriorly and the triceps posteriorly.
  • This exposes the underlying anterior and posterior muscle masses and the neurovascular fat stripe.
Step 4Define the muscle interval — enter the internervous plane
  • Define the interval between the biceps and brachialis anteriorly and the triceps posteriorly - the entry into the true internervous plane along the medial intermuscular septum.
  • Develop this interval bluntly; each side has a different nerve supply (musculocutaneous versus radial), so no muscle is denervated.
Step 5Identify the brachial artery and median nerve
  • In the fat stripe deep to the interval, identify the brachial artery and the median nerve running together.
  • The artery lies medial to the humerus with the median nerve, which crosses from lateral to medial along its course and gives no branches in the arm; gently mobilise and protect them with vessel loops.
Step 6Identify and protect the ulnar nerve
  • Identify the ulnar nerve. Proximally it runs with the neurovascular bundle.
  • Trace it distally as it pierces the medial intermuscular septum at the junction of the middle and distal thirds to enter the posterior compartment and pass behind the medial epicondyle; protect it throughout with a vessel loop.
Step 7Expose the medial humeral cortex
  • Divide the medial intermuscular septum as needed, only after the ulnar nerve is protected.
  • Expose the medial humeral cortex by subperiosteal elevation of the brachialis anteriorly and the triceps posteriorly; subperiosteal dissection keeps the radial nerve safe in the spiral groove posteriorly.
The ulnar nerve is the structure most often injured

The ulnar nerve is the most important structure at risk in this approach. It runs with the neurovascular bundle proximally, then pierces the medial intermuscular septum in the distal third to pass posteriorly behind the medial epicondyle. Injury causes intrinsic weakness, clawing and medial hand sensory loss. Identify it proximally, trace it distally through the septum, protect it with a vessel loop before dividing the septum or mobilising the triceps, and avoid traction throughout.

The medial intermuscular septum is the structural key

The approach exploits the interval between the musculocutaneous-innervated anterior compartment (brachialis and biceps) and the radial-innervated posterior compartment (triceps). Because each side has a different nerve supply, blunt development of the plane between them does not denervate either muscle mass. The medial intermuscular septum is the structural guide and is divided only where needed to reach the medial cortex - and only after the ulnar nerve is protected, because the nerve pierces this septum in the distal third.

Keep the radial nerve safe with subperiosteal dissection

The radial nerve with the profunda brachii artery lies in the spiral groove on the posterior humerus and is not normally exposed. Staying strictly subperiosteal on the humerus and avoiding aggressive posterior retraction of the triceps keeps it safe.

Dangers & Extensions

Structures at risk, by layer

Danger structures and how to protect them
LayerStructure at riskProtection
SubcutaneousBasilic vein and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerveIdentify early; protect where possible; ligate venous branches selectively; bury any divided nerve stump
Deep sheathBrachial artery and median nerveOpen the sheath carefully; mobilise gently; protect with sloops; obtain proximal and distal control before repair
SeptalUlnar nerve as it pierces the medial intermuscular septumIdentify proximally; trace distally through the septum; protect with a vessel loop before dividing the septum
PosteriorRadial nerve and profunda brachii in the spiral grooveStay strictly subperiosteal; avoid posterior over-retraction of the triceps
Ulnar nerve

The most important structure at risk. Runs with the neurovascular bundle proximally, then pierces the medial intermuscular septum in the distal third to pass posteriorly behind the medial epicondyle. Injury causes intrinsic weakness, clawing and medial hand sensory loss. Prevention: identify proximally, trace distally through the septum, protect with a vessel loop, avoid traction.

Brachial artery and median nerve

The brachial artery and median nerve travel together in the medial neurovascular sheath. They are the target of vascular exploration but are also at risk during deep dissection. Prevention: open the sheath carefully, mobilise gently, protect with sloops, achieve meticulous haemostasis, and obtain proximal and distal control before any repair.

Basilic vein and MABC nerve

The basilic vein and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve lie subcutaneously in the medial groove; the MABC nerve is often the first structure encountered after skin incision. Injury to it produces a painful neuroma and medial forearm numbness. Prevention: identify early, protect where possible, ligate venous branches selectively, and bury any divided nerve stump in muscle.

Radial nerve

The radial nerve with the profunda brachii artery lies in the spiral groove on the posterior humerus. It is not normally encountered but can be injured by aggressive posterior retraction. Prevention: stay strictly subperiosteal on the humerus and avoid posterior over-retraction of the triceps.

Extensile options. Extend proximally toward the axilla and the deltopectoral groove, developing the plane between deltoid and pectoralis major, to reach the proximal humerus, the axillary vessels and the cords of the brachial plexus - the basis for combined shoulder-arm and vascular exposure. Extend distally to the medial epicondyle and into the cubital tunnel, tracing the ulnar nerve behind the medial epicondyle; the exposure then merges with the medial (Hotchkiss) approach to the elbow for coronoid, medial collateral ligament and ulnar nerve transposition work. For complex injuries requiring circumferential humeral access, pair the medial approach with an anterolateral or posterior approach through separate incisions, and for concurrent vascular injury plan the incision jointly with the vascular surgeon so a single extensile corridor exposes both the brachial artery and the humerus. Closure. Achieve meticulous haemostasis, particularly around the venous and arterial branches. Re-approximate the deep fascia loosely over the intermuscular septum only if it does not compress the neurovascular bundle. Close subcutaneous tissue and skin in layers and consider a drain for large dead space. Document the position and status of the brachial artery, median nerve and ulnar nerve in the operative note, and apply a splint appropriate to the procedure performed. Nerve injury management:

  • If a nerve is found transected intra-operatively: primary repair or grafting by an appropriate specialist
  • If a neurapraxia is suspected post-operatively: document the deficit, remove constricting dressings, obtain EMG and nerve conduction studies at three to four weeks
  • Consider exploration if there is no clinical or electrical recovery by three months
  • For permanent ulnar or median deficits, consider nerve grafting or appropriate tendon transfers
Post-operative complications
ComplicationIncidencePreventionTreatment
Neuropraxia (ulnar or median)VariableGentle handling, no prolonged retractionObserve, EMG, explore if no recovery by three months
HaematomaLess than 5 percentMeticulous haemostasis, drain for dead spaceEvacuation if compressive or tense
Infection1 to 3 percentProphylactic antibiotics, careful soft-tissue handlingIrrigation and debridement, culture-directed antibiotics
Stiffness (if elbow involved)VariableEarly protected range of motionPhysiotherapy, manipulation under anaesthesia if persistent
Painful MABC neuromaLess than 5 percentProtect the nerve, bury a divided stumpNeuroma excision, nerve repair or relocation

Post-operative care. Document distal neurovascular status, comparing with the pre-operative baseline, and specifically test ulnar and median nerve function and distal pulses; splint or sling appropriate to the procedure and elevate the limb. For nerve work, begin early protected range of motion to prevent adhesions; for vascular repair, monitor perfusion closely and use antiplatelet or anticoagulation per the vascular protocol; for bone work, immobilise then progress loading guided by healing. Functional outcome depends on the underlying pathology and the integrity of the neurovascular structures.

Procedures Through This Approach

Procedures performed through the medial arm approach
ProcedureTargetKey technical pointStructure at risk
Brachial artery repairBrachial arteryVascular control proximal and distal before repairMedian nerve, collateral vessels
Ulnar nerve transpositionUlnar nerveDecompress from arcade of Struthers to FCU headsUlnar nerve, MABC nerve
Median nerve explorationMedian nerveStay with the brachial artery in the sheathBrachial artery
Medial cortex exposureHumerusSubperiosteal elevation of brachialis and tricepsRadial nerve posteriorly
Limited fracture fixationMedial distal humerusSmall-fragment medial column platingUlnar nerve
The medial approach is principally an access approach for vascular and nerve work, with a defined but limited role for bone. It is the route of choice for brachial artery exploration and repair in the arm, gives simultaneous access to the ulnar and median nerves, and exposes the medial humeral cortex for tumour, infection and nonunion. Concurrent vascular and skeletal reconstruction can be performed through one incision when the corridor is planned jointly with the vascular surgeon.

Viva & Exam Focus

Mnemonic

MEDIALMEDIAL arm approach — the surgical steps

M
Mark the incision
Longitudinal along the medial intermuscular septum; supine with the arm abducted and externally rotated
E
Expose the basilic vein and MABC nerve
Identify and protect the superficial structures of the medial groove
D
Develop the brachialis–triceps interval
True internervous plane along the medial intermuscular septum
I
Identify the brachial artery and median nerve
Open the medial neurovascular sheath and protect them with sloops
A
Anticipate the ulnar nerve
Trace it as it pierces the septum in the distal third to the posterior compartment
L
Lay back the muscles subperiosteally
Elevate brachialis and triceps off the medial cortex; keeps the radial nerve safe
Mnemonic

BMU BMRNeurovascular structures of the medial groove

B
Brachial artery
Runs in the sheath with the median nerve
M
Median nerve
Crosses lateral to medial; no branches in the arm
U
Ulnar nerve
Pierces the septum in the distal third to the posterior compartment
B
Basilic vein
Subcutaneous; pierces the deep fascia in the mid-arm
M
MABC nerve
Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, with the basilic vein
R
Radial nerve
Protected posteriorly in the spiral groove with the profunda brachii
Internervous plane question

Q: What is the internervous plane of the medial approach to the humerus? A: Between brachialis (musculocutaneous nerve) anteriorly and triceps (radial nerve) posteriorly, along the medial intermuscular septum. This is a true internervous plane, so developing it does not denervate either muscle mass.

Ulnar nerve course question

Q: What is the key relationship of the ulnar nerve in the arm? A: It runs with the brachial neurovascular bundle proximally, then pierces the medial intermuscular septum at the junction of the middle and distal thirds to enter the posterior compartment, passing behind the medial epicondyle. It must be identified and protected throughout.

Vascular access question

Q: How do you gain access to the brachial artery in the arm? A: Through the medial approach. Open the medial neurovascular sheath in the fat stripe between the biceps-brachialis and triceps. The brachial artery runs with the median nerve; obtain proximal and distal control before repair.

Fracture role question

Q: Why is the medial approach not the standard approach for humeral shaft fractures? A: Most shaft fractures are treated non-operatively with a functional brace. Those needing fixation are better served by the anterolateral (Henry) or posterior approach, which offer superior working room and radial nerve visualisation. The medial approach is reserved for vascular and nerve indications and medial cortex pathology.

Exam viva scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

A 9-year-old presents with a Gartland type III supracondylar humerus fracture and an absent radial pulse with signs of distal ischaemia after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. How would you use the medial approach to explore the brachial artery?

Practical approach
First confirm the fracture is stable and reassess the hand for signs of ischaemia including pain on passive finger extension, pallor and pulselessness. Position the patient supine with the arm abducted and externally rotated. Make a medial incision along the intermuscular septum centred on the elbow. Protect the basilic vein and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve in the subcutaneous layer. Deepen between biceps and brachialis anteriorly and triceps posteriorly to enter the true internervous plane. Identify the brachial artery and median nerve in the medial sheath, obtaining proximal and distal control. Inspect the artery - most pulseless hands after supracondylar fracture have an intact artery with kinking, spasm or entrapment rather than transection. Release entrapment, apply warm saline and papaverine for spasm, and perform formal repair or vein graft reconstruction with vascular surgery if the artery is transected. Re-perfuse and confirm distal pulses before closure. Consider prophylactic forearm fasciotomies if reperfusion is delayed; reconstruction options include primary repair, vein graft or interposition graft.
Key clinical points
Confirm fracture stability and document ischaemia before exploration
Supine, arm abducted and externally rotated
Protect basilic vein and MABC nerve superficially
Brachial artery and median nerve identified together in the sheath
Obtain proximal and distal control before any repair
Most pulseless hands have a kinked or spasming intact artery rather than transection
Consider prophylactic fasciotomies after delayed reperfusion
Common pitfalls
Exploring the artery without first confirming the fracture is stabilised
Assuming absence of pulse always means transection
Failing to obtain proximal and distal vascular control
Not considering compartment syndrome and fasciotomies after reperfusion
Further questions
What is the pink pulseless hand, and how does its management differ from a white pulseless hand?
Viva scenarioChallenging
Clinical prompt

A 45-year-old with severe, progressive cubital tunnel syndrome has failed conservative management. Describe how the medial approach is used for ulnar nerve decompression and anterior subcutaneous transposition.

Practical approach
Position supine with the arm abducted and externally rotated, or arm across the chest with the elbow flexed. Plan a medial incision along the intermuscular septum extending across the medial epicondyle onto the proximal forearm. Protect the basilic vein and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve superficially, because MABC injury is a leading cause of patient dissatisfaction. Identify the ulnar nerve proximally in the medial groove before it pierces the intermuscular septum, then release the cubital tunnel roof (Osborne's ligament) from proximal to distal. Decompress the nerve fully from the arcade of Struthers proximally to between the two heads of flexor carpi ulnaris distally, dividing any bands of the medial intermuscular septum that kink it. For anterior subcutaneous transposition, mobilise the nerve with its accompanying vessels, create a subcutaneous pocket over the flexor-pronator mass, and confirm the nerve glides freely without kinking through elbow flexion and extension; submuscular transposition and medial epicondylectomy are alternative techniques when indicated. Close in layers and document the final nerve position. Counsel the patient that temporary increased numbness is expected after transposition.
Key clinical points
Identify the ulnar nerve proximally before it pierces the septum
Protect the basilic vein and MABC nerve in the subcutaneous layer
Full decompression from arcade of Struthers to flexor carpi ulnaris heads
Divide medial intermuscular septum bands that kink the nerve
Confirm free gliding of the transposed nerve through a full elbow arc
Document the final nerve position meticulously
Common pitfalls
Injuring the MABC nerve, causing a painful neuroma
Incomplete proximal or distal decompression
Kinking the nerve at the transposition site
Failing to document the final position of the nerve
Further questions
What are the indications for anterior transposition over simple in-situ decompression?
Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

A 30-year-old sustains a transverse mid-shaft humerus fracture. A colleague suggests fixation through the medial approach. How do you respond, and how does the medial approach compare with the alternatives?

Practical approach
Most closed humeral shaft fractures are managed non-operatively with a functional (Sarmiento) brace, with union rates above 90 percent. When fixation is indicated - unacceptable alignment, open fracture, polytrauma, bilateral fractures, or a pathological fracture - the medial approach is generally NOT the first choice. The anterolateral (Henry) approach is the workhorse for plating the humeral shaft because it offers excellent working room and reliable radial nerve visualisation in the distal arm, protecting the nerve by keeping brachialis over it. The posterior approach is preferred when direct radial nerve visualisation in the spiral groove is needed, particularly for proximal or middle-third fractures. The medial approach is reserved for specific indications: brachial artery exploration and repair, ulnar or median nerve work, and exposure of the medial humeral cortex for tumour, infection or nonunion. It exploits a true internervous plane between brachialis and triceps but provides limited access to the radial nerve and narrower cortical exposure than the alternatives. I would therefore choose an anterolateral or posterior approach for routine shaft fixation and reserve the medial approach for its vascular and nerve indications.
Key clinical points
Most humeral shaft fractures are managed non-operatively with a brace
When fixation is needed, anterolateral or posterior is preferred
Medial approach has a true brachialis-triceps internervous plane
Medial approach is reserved for vascular and nerve indications and medial cortex pathology
It gives limited radial nerve and cortical access compared with alternatives
Know when NOT to use the medial approach - this demonstrates judgment
Common pitfalls
Over-using the medial approach for routine shaft fractures
Not recognising the radial nerve is poorly visualised medially
Forgetting that most shaft fractures are treated non-operatively
Failing to articulate the specific indications that justify the medial approach
Further questions
What are the indications for operative fixation of a humeral shaft fracture?
Exam day cheat sheet
Medial approach to the arm — exam-day essentials

Patient position

  • Supine with the arm abducted approximately 90 degrees on an arm board
  • Arm externally rotated to bring the medial septum anteriorly
  • High-arm tourniquet inflated after exsanguination
  • Arm across the chest with elbow flexed for distal ulnar nerve work
  • Radiolucent table with C-arm from the opposite side

Internervous plane

  • True plane between brachialis (musculocutaneous) and triceps (radial)
  • Developed along the medial intermuscular septum
  • No muscle denervated when the interval is correct
  • Divide the septum only after the ulnar nerve is protected
  • Subperiosteal elevation exposes the medial humeral cortex

Danger structures by layer

  • Subcutaneous: basilic vein and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve
  • Deep sheath: brachial artery and median nerve
  • Septal: ulnar nerve as it pierces the medial intermuscular septum
  • Posterior: radial nerve and profunda brachii in the spiral groove
  • Bony: medial humeral cortex and periosteum

Ulnar nerve key facts

  • Runs with the neurovascular bundle proximally
  • Pierces the medial intermuscular septum in the distal third
  • Enters the posterior compartment then passes behind the medial epicondyle
  • Identify proximally and protect with a vessel loop throughout
  • Injury causes intrinsic weakness, clawing and medial hand sensory loss

Procedures through this approach

  • Brachial artery exploration and repair
  • Ulnar nerve decompression or anterior transposition
  • Median nerve exploration in the arm
  • Medial humeral cortex exposure for tumour, infection and nonunion
  • Limited medial-column distal humerus fracture fixation

Extensions and limitations

  • Proximal extension toward axilla exposes axillary vessels and plexus cords
  • Distal extension reaches the cubital tunnel and medial elbow approach
  • Limited role for humeral shaft fracture fixation
  • Anterolateral or posterior preferred for routine shaft plating
  • Poor radial nerve visualisation compared with alternatives

References

Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice The medial approach to the arm and distal humerus is a classical Henry exposure taught and examined worldwide across advanced orthopaedic practice, DNB/MS, MRCS and SICOT systems. Its principles - supine positioning, a true brachialis-triceps internervous plane along the medial intermuscular septum, and systematic protection of the brachial artery, median nerve, ulnar nerve, basilic vein and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve - are consistent internationally.

Convergent guidance on humeral approaches and neurovascular access
BodyPosition
AO FoundationMost humeral shaft fractures are non-operative; when plating is required, anterolateral or posterior approaches are standard; vascular compromise mandates urgent brachial artery exploration
BOA / BOAST (vascular)Limb-threatening vascular injury is a surgical emergency; document hard and soft signs of vascular injury; joint orthopaedic-vascular management with prompt revascularisation and consideration of fasciotomies
AAOS / ASSHUlnar neuropathy at the elbow managed by in-situ decompression or transposition depending on severity and local anatomy; protect the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve during medial elbow surgery

Population and clinical evidence:

  • Humeral shaft fractures have an incidence of roughly 12 to 15 per 100,000 per year, and the majority unite with functional bracing.
  • Pulseless supracondylar fractures are most often associated with a kinked or in-spasm intact artery rather than transection; formal vascular repair is required in a minority.
  • Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow is the second most common upper-limb compressive neuropathy, and surgical technique selection remains individualised. Global practice variation. In high-resource centres, dedicated vascular repair and microsurgical nerve reconstruction are immediately available, and small-fragment pre-contoured medial plates support limited fixation. In resource-limited settings, the same anatomical principles apply with standard small-fragment implants; non-operative bracing has a correspondingly larger role for shaft fractures, and brachial artery repair may rely on vein graft and limited instrumentation. Consent (globally applicable): discuss injury to the ulnar or median nerve (variable incidence, mostly transient), injury to the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve with possible painful neuroma, bleeding from the basilic vein or brachial artery, infection (1 to 3 percent), haematoma, and stiffness if the elbow is incorporated.
Orthopaedic relevance

For the Operative Surgery station you must describe the medial approach to the arm systematically: supine positioning with the arm abducted and externally rotated, the true brachialis-triceps internervous plane along the medial intermuscular septum, identification and protection of the brachial artery, median nerve and ulnar nerve (which pierces the septum distally), and the limited role of this approach for humeral shaft fracture fixation. Know its principal indications - vascular exploration and repair, ulnar and median nerve work, and medial cortex exposure.

Evidence

Alternative operative exposures of the humeral shaft with regard to the radial nerve

Gerwin M, Hotchkiss RN, Weiland AJJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (1996)
Key Findings:
  • Mapped the three-dimensional course of the radial nerve across the humeral shaft relative to bony landmarks such as the acromion and lateral epicondyle
  • Showed that anterior and medial exposures of the humeral shaft allow bone access while keeping the radial nerve protected within the posterior compartment
  • Established safe zones that guide selection among anterior, medial and posterior humeral shaft exposures
Evidence

Extensile Exposure (the original description of the medial approach to the humeral shaft)

Henry AKChurchill Livingstone (1957)
Key Findings:
  • The original description of the medial approach to the humeral shaft along the medial intermuscular septum
  • Emphasised developing the plane between the biceps and brachialis anteriorly and the triceps posteriorly to reach the medial cortex
  • Detailed systematic identification and protection of the brachial vessels and the median and ulnar nerves
Evidence

Surgical Exposures in Orthopaedics: The Anatomic Approach (standard reference for the medial humeral approach)

Hoppenfeld S, deBoer P, Buckley RWolters Kluwer (2017)
Key Findings:
  • The standard anatomic reference describing the medial approach to the humerus step by step
  • Defines the true internervous plane between brachialis (musculocutaneous nerve) and triceps (radial nerve)
  • Identifies the basilic vein and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve as the key superficial structures to protect in the medial groove
Evidence

Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (Cochrane systematic review)

Caliandro P, La Torre G, Padua R, Giannini F, Padua LCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2016)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of conservative and surgical treatments for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow
  • Found low-quality evidence that no single surgical technique - simple decompression, anterior transposition or medial epicondylectomy - is clearly superior
  • Supports individualising ulnar nerve management based on severity and intra-operative nerve findings
Evidence

Simple decompression or anterior subcutaneous transposition for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a prospective randomised study

Bartels RHMA, Verhagen WIM, van der Wilt GJ, et al.Neurosurgery (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective randomised trial (the CUBIST study) comparing simple decompression with anterior subcutaneous transposition for idiopathic ulnar neuropathy at the elbow
  • Found no significant difference in primary outcome between simple decompression and subcutaneous transposition
  • Informs the choice between in-situ decompression and transposition when the ulnar nerve is exposed through the medial arm approach
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.