Nail Bed & Fingertip Injury Repair
Surgical technique guide for Nail Bed and Fingertip Injury Repair - FRCS exam preparation
Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team
Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow β’ Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team
Nail bed anatomy is critical: germinal matrix produces 90% of the nail plate, sterile matrix anchors it. A subungual haematoma with an intact nail and nail margin can be trephined regardless of size; plate removal and nail bed repair are reserved for a disrupted nail fold, displaced plate or visible laceration. All germinal matrix injuries must be anatomically repaired β even small defects cause permanent nail deformity. Seymour fracture in children is an open physeal fracture masquerading as a mallet finger. Allen zones guide fingertip reconstruction. | intermediate
Surgical Imaging



Critical Exam Pitfalls β Nail Bed Repair
Germinal vs Sterile Matrix
Germinal matrix: Located under the proximal nail fold (lunula). Produces 90% of the nail plate. Injury here = permanent nail deformity if not repaired anatomically. Not visible without removing the nail plate.
Sterile matrix: Underlies the visible nail plate distally. Produces 10% of nail plate. Anchors the nail to the nail bed. Injury here causes nail nonadherence (onycholysis) if not repaired.
Rule: Every nail bed injury must be inspected directly β always remove the nail plate.
Subungual Haematoma β Modern Threshold
Trephination sufficient: Nail plate AND nail margin intact β regardless of haematoma size. Evidence (Roser & Gellman, Level III) shows equivalent outcomes to nail removal even for large haematomas with an intact nail, so the old 50% rule is no longer an indication for surgery on its own.
Nail plate removal required: Disruption of the nail fold, OR avulsion/displacement of the nail plate edge, OR clinical or radiographic suspicion of a nail-bed laceration. (Quote the classic 50% threshold in vivas, but state that you would explore based on nail-fold integrity rather than haematoma size alone.)
Trephination technique: Heated paper clip, electrocautery or drill bit (18G) over the haematoma β do not force through, let it decompress spontaneously.
Seymour Fracture (Paediatric)
Definition: Physeal fracture (Salter-Harris I or II) of the distal phalanx in a child with the nail plate avulsed from the nail fold β an open fracture.
Why critical: The nail fold is torn, the nail matrix is disrupted, and the fracture communicates with the exterior through the nail bed. It is NOT a simple mallet finger.
Treatment: Irrigation, debridement under anaesthesia, nail bed repair, fracture reduction, nail plate replacement as biological dressing. Antibiotics. Missed cases develop osteomyelitis.
Nail Replacement as Stent
Why replace the nail plate: After nail bed repair, the nail plate serves three functions β biological dressing protecting the repair, a splint maintaining the nail fold open, and a template guiding nail regrowth.
Technique: After nail bed repair, clean and fenestrate the nail plate (two holes to allow drainage). Replace under the proximal nail fold and suture to the nail folds with 4-0 nylon through the fenestrations.
Alternative: If nail plate is destroyed β use sterile non-adherent material (aluminium foil from suture pack, silicone sheet, or petroleum gauze) trimmed to size.
Allen Zones and Management
Zone I: Distal to bone β pulp and skin loss only. Conservative dressing (excellent result in children). Composite graft (tip replantation) in cooperative patient within 6 hours.
Zone II: Includes bone loss β distal phalanx exposed. V-Y advancement flap (Atasoy or Kutler), homodigital island flap.
Zone III: Loss to DIP joint level. Cross-finger flap (2-stage), thenar flap. Complex reconstruction.
Zone IV: Loss proximal to DIP joint. Significant reconstruction or replantation if available.
Nail Deformity Complications
Split nail: Longitudinal scar of germinal matrix β nail grows in two halves. Prevent by anatomical repair of germinal matrix at primary surgery.
Hook nail (beaking): Loss of bone support for nail β nail curves over fingertip. Prevent by preserving bone length or using advancement flap to support nail.
Non-adherent nail (onycholysis): Sterile matrix scar β nail grows but does not adhere. Repair sterile matrix at primary surgery.
No nail growth: Complete germinal matrix destruction β irreversible. Consider nail ablation for patient comfort.
NAILNAIL β Nail Bed Repair Principles
ALLENALLEN β Fingertip Amputation Zone Management
Indications and Evidence Base
When to Operate β Nail Bed Injuries
Indications for Nail Plate Removal and Repair:
- Any disruption of the proximal nail fold (nail plate avulsed or displaced from the fold)
- Visible nail bed laceration or avulsion
- Seymour fracture (child with physeal fracture and nail fold disruption)
- Nail plate avulsed from its bed entirely
- (Classic teaching adds "subungual haematoma greater than 50%" β but with an intact nail and nail margin the evidence supports trephination alone irrespective of haematoma size; explore on nail-fold integrity, not haematoma size)
Trephination Only (Conservative):
- Nail plate and nail margin structurally intact (haematoma size is NOT a contraindication to trephination if the nail is intact)
- No displaced or open distal phalanx fracture
- Performed within 48 hours (haematoma liquefied); later, clot may be too organised to drain
Fingertip Reconstruction Indications:
- Allen Zone II or greater: exposed bone requires flap coverage
- Zone I may be conservative (particularly in children β remarkable healing)
- Composite graft (replaced amputated tip) if available within 6 hours, patient cooperative
Key Evidence
Allen 1980 (Hand journal): Original description of the Allen classification of fingertip amputations (Zones I-IV) with treatment recommendations by zone. Landmark paper establishing conservative treatment for Zone I injuries and the principle of matching reconstruction complexity to zone of injury. (This historical paper predates routine PubMed indexing and is cited for completeness without a verified PMID.)
Evidence nuance candidates must know: the most-quoted comparative data actually challenge the dogma of routine nail removal. Roser & Gellman found NO outcome advantage of formal nail bed repair over simple decompression when the nail and nail margin are intact, and the Cochrane review found no proven infection benefit from prophylactic antibiotics after simple repair. The teaching position is therefore: an intact nail plate with an intact nail fold can be decompressed; nail removal is reserved for a disrupted nail fold, an avulsed/displaced plate, or a frank nail-bed laceration where direct repair (suture or tissue adhesive) is needed.
Comparison of nail bed repair versus nail trephination for subungual hematomas in children
A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of 2-octylcyanoacrylate versus suture repair for nail bed injuries
Juxta-epiphysial fracture of the terminal phalanx of the finger
Seymour fractures: retrospective analysis and therapeutic considerations
Interventions for treating fingertip entrapment injuries in children (Cochrane systematic review)
Decision Algorithm
Fingertip Injury β Management by Mechanism and Zone
Viva Scenarios β Nail Bed Repair
Use these scenarios to practise clinical reasoning and management decisions
"A 9-year-old child presents to the emergency department after catching their finger in a door. On examination there is a mallet deformity of the ring finger DIP joint and the nail plate appears displaced proximally from the nail fold. What is your diagnosis and management?"
"A 28-year-old chef sustains a fingertip amputation of the dominant index finger at the level of the distal third of the distal phalanx (Allen Zone II). There is 8mm of pulp loss and the bone is exposed. The amputated tip is not available. What are your reconstructive options?"
"You review a patient at 4 months after nail bed repair for a crush injury. She has a split nail deformity β her nail grows in two halves with a longitudinal ridge. How do you explain what has happened and what can be done?"
Nail Bed & Fingertip Repair β Exam Cheat Sheet
Clinical summary
References
-
Allen MJ. Conservative management of finger tip injuries in adults. Hand. 1980;12(3):257-265. (Historical paper, not PubMed-indexed.)
-
Seymour N. Juxta-epiphysial fracture of the terminal phalanx of the finger. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1966;48(2):347-349. PMID: 5939484
-
Roser SE, Gellman H. Comparison of nail bed repair versus nail trephination for subungual hematomas in children. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24(6):1166-1170. PMID: 10584937. doi:10.1053/jhsu.1999.1166
-
Strauss EJ, Weil WM, Jordan C, Paksima N. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of 2-octylcyanoacrylate versus suture repair for nail bed injuries. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(2):250-253. PMID: 18294549. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.10.008
-
Krusche-Mandl I, KΓΆttstorfer J, Thalhammer G, et al. Seymour fractures: retrospective analysis and therapeutic considerations. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(2):258-264. PMID: 23351909. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.11.015
-
Capstick R, Giele H. Interventions for treating fingertip entrapment injuries in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(4):CD009808. PMID: 24788568. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009808.pub2
-
Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH, Cohen MS, eds. Green's Operative Hand Surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2017.
-
Ignatiadis IA, Yiannakopoulos CK, Barbitsioti AD. Nail bed and fingertip injuries. Injury. 2010;41(Suppl 2):S23-S27.