Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Osteochondral Allograft (OCA)

Operative SurgerySports Medicine
Sports MedicineIntermediateCore Procedure

Osteochondral Allograft (OCA)

Comprehensive guide to fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation - indications, storage, surgical technique, and outcomes for orthopaedic examination

Procedure console
25 min
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Fresh cadaveric transplant · Large lesions over 4cm² · Mature hyaline cartilage in a single stage

Over 4cm²Typical lesion size
28 daysOptimal use from harvest
75-85%Survivorship at 10 years
Type IIHyaline collagen preserved
Critical Must-Knows
  • OCA is the only cartilage restoration option that transfers mature hyaline cartilage with its subchondral bone in a single stage, making it first-line for large defects, failed prior cartilage surgery and lesions with bone loss.
  • Fresh (not frozen) graft is essential — fresh allograft stored at 4°C keeps living chondrocytes; freezing destroys the cells (less than 1% viability).
  • Optimal implantation is within 28 days of harvest, and the graft must be size-matched to the recipient through a tissue bank.
  • No donor-site morbidity, and unlike OATS or ACI it restores subchondral bone stock.
  • Survival depends on correcting the mechanical environment — malalignment, ligament and meniscal deficiency must be addressed or the graft will fail.

When & Why


OCA is the only cartilage restoration option that transfers large volumes of mature hyaline cartilage together with its subchondral bone in a single operation. It fills a critical niche for defects that are too large for autograft, have failed previous cartilage surgery, or involve bone loss — and it does so without donor-site morbidity.

Why this topic matters

OCA uniquely restores both hyaline cartilage and subchondral bone in one stage. Understanding fresh versus frozen tissue and the narrow storage window is what examiners test.

Indications and contraindications

Indications
  • Large lesions over 4cm² that exceed OATS donor capacity - Failed prior cartilage surgery (OATS, microfracture, ACI) - Osteonecrosis with cartilage damage - Post-traumatic defects with bone loss - Bipolar (kissing) lesions (selected cases) - Young patients unsuitable for arthroplasty
Contraindications
  • Diffuse osteoarthritis - Inflammatory arthropathy - Active infection - Uncorrected malalignment - Non-compliant patient - Unrealistic expectations

Clinical assessment

History
  • Prior cartilage surgery (failed OATS, microfracture, ACI) - Large traumatic defect - Osteonecrosis symptoms (night pain, rest pain) - Mechanical symptoms (catching, locking, swelling) - Activity level and expectations
Examination
  • Joint effusion — often present - Crepitus — may indicate cartilage damage - Tenderness — localized to the affected compartment - Alignment — assess for malalignment - Stability — rule out ligamentous insufficiency
Correct the mechanical environment first

Before OCA, assess and address every contributing factor: malalignment (osteotomy), ligament insufficiency (reconstruction) and meniscal deficiency (meniscal allograft or preservation). An OCA placed into a malaligned, unstable or meniscal-deficient knee will fail.

Investigations and sizing

Investigation protocol

First lineWeight-bearing X-rays

Weight-bearing AP, lateral, Rosenberg and skyline views. Assess joint space, alignment, osteoarthritic change and subchondral bone. Sizing films are sent to the tissue bank for donor matching.

EssentialMRI

Defines lesion size and location, subchondral bone status (oedema, cysts, avascular necrosis), bone-marrow lesion extent and any associated meniscal or ligament pathology.

For sizingCT

Precise donor-recipient size matching; 3D reconstruction helps with complex defects and confirms available bone stock.

Size matching

Tissue banks use CT or X-ray measurements to match donor to recipient. The graft should be matched to within 2-3mm. An oversized graft can be trimmed; an undersized graft cannot fill the defect adequately.

Choosing OCA over other cartilage procedures

Ideal lesion size
OCA
Over 4cm²
OATS
1-4cm²
ACI/MACI
Over 2cm²
Cartilage type
OCA
Hyaline (Type II)
OATS
Hyaline (Type II)
ACI/MACI
Hyaline-like
Stages
OCA
Single
OATS
Single
ACI/MACI
Two
Donor morbidity
OCA
None (allograft)
OATS
10-15%
ACI/MACI
None (biopsy only)
Bone stock
OCA
Restores bone
OATS
Transfers with plug
ACI/MACI
Requires intact bone
Availability
OCA
Limited (tissue bank)
OATS
Immediate (patient)
ACI/MACI
Requires cell culture
OCA versus OATS and ACI/MACI
FeatureOCAOATSACI/MACI
Ideal lesion sizeOver 4cm²1-4cm²Over 2cm²
Cartilage typeHyaline (Type II)Hyaline (Type II)Hyaline-like
StagesSingleSingleTwo
Donor morbidityNone (allograft)10-15%None (biopsy only)
Bone stockRestores boneTransfers with plugRequires intact bone
AvailabilityLimited (tissue bank)Immediate (patient)Requires cell culture

Choose OCA when the lesion is over 4cm² (exceeding OATS capacity), prior cartilage surgery has failed, there is bone loss or avascular necrosis, the lesion is bipolar, or the patient is young and unsuitable for arthroplasty. Choose OATS for a single 1-4cm² lesion without bone loss where timing is critical. Choose ACI/MACI for a large lesion without bone loss when OCA is unavailable or the patient prefers autologous tissue. Concomitant procedures

Malalignment
Procedure
HTO or DFO
Timing
Staged or concurrent
ACL deficiency
Procedure
ACL reconstruction
Timing
Concurrent or staged
Meniscal deficiency
Procedure
Meniscal allograft
Timing
Concurrent preferred
PCL deficiency
Procedure
PCL reconstruction
Timing
Usually staged
Address associated pathology at the same time
PathologyProcedureTiming
MalalignmentHTO or DFOStaged or concurrent
ACL deficiencyACL reconstructionConcurrent or staged
Meniscal deficiencyMeniscal allograftConcurrent preferred
PCL deficiencyPCL reconstructionUsually staged

Pre-operative coordination with the tissue bank

Pre-operative steps

Weeks priorTissue bank coordination

Contact the tissue bank, provide sizing imaging (CT/X-ray) and request a size-matched graft. Confirm availability and timing.

Days priorGraft arrival

Confirm graft arrival and harvest date. Verify it is within the storage window (under 28 days from harvest) and review the donor screening documentation.

Day of surgeryOperating room

Prepare the graft bench, have a back-up plan if the graft proves unsuitable intra-operatively, and confirm standard arthroscopy and open equipment.

The 28-day window

Fresh OCA should be implanted within 28 days of harvest for optimal chondrocyte viability; beyond this, viability falls significantly. The window is rigid — the patient and operating room must be available when the graft arrives.

The Operation


The goal is to expose the defect through a mini-open (usually medial or lateral parapatellar) approach, prepare a perpendicular recipient socket that matches the graft geometry, harvest and contour a size-matched fresh allograft dowel, and seat it flush so that living hyaline cartilage and subchondral bone are transferred in one stage. The exposure and the dowel/plug technique form the backbone; shell and hemicondylar variants are adaptations for larger or more complex defects.

Intra-operative osteochondral allograft of the femoral condyle
Intra-operative photograph of an osteochondral allograft, a cylindrical plug seated flush within a defect on the femoral condyle.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration
Fresh, not frozen — the graft is living tissue

Fresh OCA stored at 4°C maintains chondrocyte viability for the storage window; frozen graft stored at -80°C has less than 1% viability because freezing destroys the cells. Only fresh allograft is used for cartilage restoration — frozen allograft is structural bone only.

Operative sequence (dowel / plug technique)

Step 1Positioning and set-up
  • Supine with a thigh-side support and a lateral post as needed; upper-thigh tourniquet.
  • Standard knee arthroscopy set-up plus the allograft instrumentation and graft on the back table; confirm the graft is within the storage window before draping.
Step 2Diagnostic arthroscopy and defect assessment
  • Examine the whole joint — confirm lesion size and location, assess the menisci, ligaments and opposing articular surface, and exclude diffuse degeneration that would contraindicate the graft.
  • Measure the defect and plan the graft geometry (dowel for a contained circular or oval lesion, shell for a larger or irregular defect).
Step 3Exposure — mini-open medial or lateral parapatellar
  • A mini-open approach is typical: a medial parapatellar arthrotomy for medial femoral condyle lesions, lateral for lateral condyle — whichever gives perpendicular access to the defect (see the medial parapatellar approach to the knee).
  • The exposure must be adequate for the sizing corer and graft instrumentation; a modest arthrotomy with the knee flexed to deliver the condyle usually suffices.
Step 4Recipient site preparation
  • Mark the lesion boundaries.
  • Use a recipient sizing corer to create a cylindrical socket perpendicular to the articular surface, matching depth to the available graft depth and aiming for a stable, intact rim of surrounding cartilage.
Step 5Graft preparation and sizing
  • Harvest the dowel from the size-matched allograft condyle using a matching corer, matching articular curvature and orientation to the recipient.
  • Trim the cancellous bone depth to match the recipient socket so the graft will seat flush.
Step 6Implantation and fixation
  • Insert the graft into the recipient site; press-fit is usually sufficient. The graft should be flush or 1mm proud — never recessed below the surrounding cartilage.
  • If the graft is unstable, add bioabsorbable pins; avoid metal hardware where possible.
Step 7Closure
  • Confirm graft stability and congruity through a full range of motion.
  • Layered closure over a drain if needed; release the tourniquet and obtain haemostasis. Apply a bulky dressing and a brace locked for transfer.
Protect the cartilage surface at all times

Handle the articular surface gently and keep it moist with saline throughout. Minimise tourniquet time and do not compress or traumatise the cartilage during insertion — the living chondrocytes are the whole point of the procedure.

Flush or 1mm proud — never recessed

The graft must sit flush with the surrounding articular surface or at most 1mm proud. A recessed graft leaves a step-off that concentrates load and fails; an excessively proud graft catches and delaminates. Press-fit is usually enough; add bioabsorbable pins only if the graft is unstable.

Larger or irregular defects. The same principles — perpendicular fit, flush seating, secure fixation — extend to a shell graft (a thin cartilage-bone slice over a shallow 5-10mm bed, fixed with bioabsorbable pins or headless screws, which preserves recipient bone stock and allows custom shaping) and to hemicondylar grafts for massive defects (rigid plate-and-screw fixation, longer rehabilitation, higher failure rate). The full graft-geometry classification is detailed under Background & Evidence.

Aftercare & Complications


Weight-bearing and rehabilitation Rehabilitation is longer than after OATS because the deeper bone graft needs more time to integrate. Hemicondylar grafts may need 3-4 months of protection before full weight-bearing.

Weight-bearing progression

Weeks 0-6Non-weight-bearing

Strict non-weight-bearing or toe-touch only. Longer protection than OATS because of the deeper bone integration required.

Weeks 6-12Partial weight-bearing

Progressive weight-bearing from 25% to 75%; crutches continued.

Weeks 12-16Full weight-bearing

Wean from crutches; full weight-bearing by 16 weeks, continuing to avoid impact.

Longer protection for deep grafts

OCA rehabilitation is longer than OATS because deeper bone grafts need more time to integrate. Hemicondylar grafts may need 3-4 months of protection before full weight-bearing.

Return to activity

Activity progression

4-6 monthsLow impact

Swimming, cycling, elliptical. No running or jumping.

9-12 monthsRunning

Jogging progression; sport-specific drills begin.

12-18 monthsFull sport

Return to sport if criteria are met — longer than after OATS or microfracture. Consider permanent activity modification for large grafts.

Outcomes and prognosis

5 years
Survivorship
85-90%
Considerations
Good early results expected
10 years
Survivorship
75-85%
Considerations
Progressive decline begins
15 years
Survivorship
65-75%
Considerations
Can act as a bridge to arthroplasty
Long-term survivorship
Time pointSurvivorshipConsiderations
5 years85-90%Good early results expected
10 years75-85%Progressive decline begins
15 years65-75%Can act as a bridge to arthroplasty
OCA as a bridge to arthroplasty

In young patients unsuitable for arthroplasty, OCA can delay TKA by 10-15 years on average. Even if the graft eventually fails it preserves bone stock and still allows eventual arthroplasty — a valuable strategy in patients too young for definitive replacement.

Complications

Graft failure or collapse
Incidence
10-15% at 10 years
Risk factors
Large or deep grafts, poor integration
Prevention / management
Protect weight-bearing, optimise biology
Disease transmission
Incidence
Very rare
Risk factors
Inadequate donor screening
Prevention / management
Rigorous donor screening protocols
Non-union of bone
Incidence
5-10%
Risk factors
Deep grafts, poor vascularity
Prevention / management
Protected loading, avoid smoking
Subchondral collapse
Incidence
5-10%
Risk factors
Early loading, poor bone quality
Prevention / management
Extended non-weight-bearing for deep grafts
Immune response
Incidence
Rare for cartilage
Risk factors
Deep bone grafts
Prevention / management
Cartilage is immune-privileged
Complications — recognition, risk factors, prevention
ComplicationIncidenceRisk factorsPrevention / management
Graft failure or collapse10-15% at 10 yearsLarge or deep grafts, poor integrationProtect weight-bearing, optimise biology
Disease transmissionVery rareInadequate donor screeningRigorous donor screening protocols
Non-union of bone5-10%Deep grafts, poor vascularityProtected loading, avoid smoking
Subchondral collapse5-10%Early loading, poor bone qualityExtended non-weight-bearing for deep grafts
Immune responseRare for cartilageDeep bone graftsCartilage is immune-privileged
Disease transmission risk

Disease transmission is possible with any allograft, though very rare. All donors undergo rigorous screening — serology, nucleic-acid testing, culture and medical-history review. HIV and hepatitis C transmission have been reported historically but are extremely rare with modern protocols.

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

FRESHFRESH — why fresh matters

F
Frozen kills cells
Less than 1% viability after freezing
R
Refrigerated at 4°C
Optimal storage temperature
E
Early use — within 28 days
Implant within the storage window; superficial-zone viability falls after about 2 weeks
S
Surviving chondrocytes
Living cells maintain the matrix — the whole point of using fresh tissue
H
Hyaline preserved
Type II collagen matrix intact
Mnemonic

LARGELARGE — when to use OCA

L
Large lesions (over 4cm²)
Exceeds autograft capacity
A
AVN or bone loss
Restores bone stock
R
Revision cartilage surgery
After failed OATS or microfracture
G
Geometric matching
Size-matched from the tissue bank
E
Extensive defects
Hemicondylar or bipolar lesions

Exam viva scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioStandard
Clinical prompt

“A 28-year-old man has a 5cm² full-thickness cartilage defect on the medial femoral condyle after failed microfracture two years ago. What are your treatment options?”

Viva scenarioChallenging
Clinical prompt

“Why do we use fresh osteochondral allograft rather than frozen, and what are the storage considerations?”

Viva scenarioCritical
Clinical prompt

“A 35-year-old has bipolar (kissing) lesions on the medial femoral condyle and tibial plateau after a failed HTO. What are your options?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Osteochondral allograft — exam-day essentials

Definition

  • Fresh cadaveric osteochondral graft
  • Bone plus hyaline cartilage transplant
  • Living chondrocytes preserved
  • Single-stage procedure

Fresh versus frozen

  • Fresh at 4°C = over 70% viability
  • Frozen at -80°C = under 1% viability
  • Fresh essential for cartilage restoration
  • 28 days optimal storage window

Indications (LARGE)

  • Large lesions over 4cm²
  • AVN or bone loss present
  • Revision after failed cartilage surgery
  • Geometric matching from tissue bank
  • Extensive defects (bipolar, hemicondylar)

Key numbers

  • Over 4cm² = typical size indication
  • 28 days = quoted fresh storage window at 4°C
  • Over 70% = commonly-taught fresh chondrocyte viability
  • 82% = femoral-condyle survivorship at 10 years (Levy 2013)
  • Bipolar grafts = clearly worse than unipolar

Advantages

  • Mature hyaline cartilage (Type II)
  • Single-stage surgery
  • No donor-site morbidity
  • Restores bone stock
  • Large-lesion capability

Disadvantages

  • Limited availability
  • Narrow storage window
  • Disease-transmission risk (rare)
  • Logistical coordination required
  • Higher cost than autograft
High-yield recall questions
  • Storage temperature? 4°C (refrigerated, in nutrient medium) — never frozen for cartilage restoration.
  • Viability of fresh OCA at 28 days? Over 70% (commonly taught); note superficial-zone viability already declines beyond about 2 weeks at 4°C.
  • Viability of frozen OCA? Less than 1% — freezing destroys chondrocytes.
  • Typical lesion size? Over 4cm², where OATS donor capacity is exceeded.
  • 10-year survivorship? 75-85% overall; 82% for femoral-condyle grafts (Levy 2013).
  • Bipolar versus unipolar? Substantially worse — bipolar grafting is a recognised predictor of failure.

Background & Evidence


Why fresh matters — chondrocyte viability Cartilage restoration depends on living chondrocytes maintaining the matrix, which is why only fresh allograft is used.

Chondrocyte viability
Fresh (4°C)
Over 70% at 28 days
Frozen (-80°C)
Less than 1%
Matrix integrity
Fresh (4°C)
Preserved
Frozen (-80°C)
Preserved
Storage window
Fresh (4°C)
14-28 days optimal
Frozen (-80°C)
Years
Availability
Fresh (4°C)
Limited, requires coordination
Frozen (-80°C)
Readily available
Use for cartilage
Fresh (4°C)
Yes — living cartilage
Frozen (-80°C)
No — structural only
Fresh versus frozen allograft
PropertyFresh (4°C)Frozen (-80°C)
Chondrocyte viabilityOver 70% at 28 daysLess than 1%
Matrix integrityPreservedPreserved
Storage window14-28 days optimalYears
AvailabilityLimited, requires coordinationReadily available
Use for cartilageYes — living cartilageNo — structural only
Note the nuance examiners like: the commonly-taught "over 70% at 28 days" is generous. Controlled laboratory work (Pallante 2009) shows that at 4°C the vulnerable superficial zone falls to around 20% viability by 28 days while the en-face figure holds near 45% — which is why earlier implantation is preferred and physiologic 37°C storage is being investigated. Why cartilage is immune-privileged and how the graft integrates

Why cartilage is immune-privileged
  • Avascular — no access for immune cells - Chondrocytes encased in matrix - Low immunogenicity of cartilage matrix - Bone is immunogenic — deeper grafts may generate a response
How the graft integrates
  • Bone-to-bone healing: 8-12 weeks - Cartilage: minimal integration (fibrocartilaginous junction) - Subchondral bone remodels over 1-2 years - Deeper grafts integrate more slowly

Graft-geometry classification and common locations

Dowel / plug
Description
Cylindrical grafts (like a large OATS)
Best for
Contained circular or oval lesions
Shell graft
Description
Thin cartilage-bone slice over a shallow bed (5-10mm)
Best for
Large surface lesions, good bone stock
Hemicondylar
Description
Entire condylar surface
Best for
Massive defects, failed TKA salvage
Bipolar
Description
Both articulating surfaces
Best for
Tibial plus femoral kissing lesions
Graft geometry classification — when to use each
TypeDescriptionBest for
Dowel / plugCylindrical grafts (like a large OATS)Contained circular or oval lesions
Shell graftThin cartilage-bone slice over a shallow bed (5-10mm)Large surface lesions, good bone stock
HemicondylarEntire condylar surfaceMassive defects, failed TKA salvage
BipolarBoth articulating surfacesTibial plus femoral kissing lesions
Medial femoral condyle
Considerations
Most common, good access
Technique
Dowel or shell
Lateral femoral condyle
Considerations
Match curvature carefully
Technique
Dowel or shell
Trochlea
Considerations
Requires precise contouring
Technique
Shell often better
Patella
Considerations
Technically challenging
Technique
Shell graft
Tibial plateau
Considerations
Uncommon, difficult access
Technique
Dowel or shell
Common OCA locations and technical considerations
LocationConsiderationsTechnique
Medial femoral condyleMost common, good accessDowel or shell
Lateral femoral condyleMatch curvature carefullyDowel or shell
TrochleaRequires precise contouringShell often better
PatellaTechnically challengingShell graft
Tibial plateauUncommon, difficult accessDowel or shell

Global availability and regulation

Access and regulation
  • Fresh OCA availability is limited everywhere because of the narrow storage window - Tissue must come from an accredited bank: AATB (US), and national tissue authorities or EU Tissue Directive standards elsewhere - Some regions import grafts from US tissue banks where domestic supply is scarce - Cost and logistics are universal barriers - When fresh OCA is unavailable: OATS (smaller lesions) or ACI/MACI (no bone loss)
Documentation standards
  • Document graft harvest date and storage duration - Record donor screening documentation - Document surgical technique and fixation - Consent must include disease-transmission risk - Record the size-matching process
Medicolegal considerations

Consent must cover disease-transmission risk (very low but real), the potential for failure and conversion to TKA, and realistic sport expectations. Document the graft arrival and harvest date (confirm within window), record that donor screening was reviewed, and note the storage and surgical technique — if the graft fails early, this documentation is protective.

References


Evidence

OCA long-term survivorship of the femoral condyle

LoE 4
Levy YD, Gortz S, Pulido PA, McCauley JC, Bugbee WD • Clin Orthop Relat Res (2013)
Key Findings:
  • 129 knees, median 13.5-year follow-up: graft survivorship 82% at 10 years, 74% at 15 years, 66% at 20 years
  • Graft failure (revision OCA or arthroplasty) in 24%; reoperation in 47%
  • Age over 30 at surgery and two or more prior surgeries on the knee predicted failure
  • Modified Merle d'Aubigne-Postel and IKDC pain and function scores improved durably
Clinical implication: OCA gives durable femoral-condyle results into the second decade; younger patients with fewer prior operations do best. Reoperation is common even when the graft survives — counsel accordingly.
Limitation: Retrospective single-center series from a high-volume centre; results may not generalise.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 22961315)
Evidence

Storage temperature and chondrocyte viability

LoE 5
Pallante AL, Bae WC, Chen AC, Gortz S, Bugbee WD, Sah RL • Am J Sports Med (2009)
Key Findings:
  • At 4°C, chondrocyte viability fell to about 45% en face and only about 20% in the vulnerable superficial zone by 28 days
  • Storage at 37°C maintained much higher viability at 28 days (about 80% surface, about 65% superficial zone)
  • Cartilage thickness, glycosaminoglycan and collagen content were preserved at both temperatures
  • Cell viability deteriorates faster than matrix — the matrix outlasts the living cells
Clinical implication: The classic 28-day 4°C window is generous: superficial-zone viability is already compromised beyond about 2 weeks, which is why earlier implantation is preferred and physiologic (37°C) storage is being investigated.
Limitation: Controlled laboratory study in caprine osteochondral samples; not a clinical outcome study.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 19861697)
Evidence

OCA for steroid-associated femoral condyle osteonecrosis

LoE 4
Gortz S, De Young AJ, Bugbee WD • Clin Orthop Relat Res (2010)
Key Findings:
  • 28 knees (mean age 24 years, mean graft area 10.8 cm²), mean follow-up 67 months
  • Graft survival 89% (25 of 28); 76% scored over 15 on the modified d'Aubigne-Postel scale
  • IKDC pain and function and Knee Society scores improved markedly
  • Arthroplasty was avoided in 27 of 28 knees at last follow-up
Clinical implication: OCA is a reasonable joint-preserving salvage for high-grade osteonecrosis in young patients, restoring both bone stock and cartilage and deferring arthroplasty.
Limitation: Small retrospective case series from a high-volume centre; steroid-associated osteonecrosis specifically.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 20143191)
Evidence

Return to sport after OCA

LoE 4
Krych AJ, Robertson CM, Williams RJ III • Am J Sports Med (2012)
Key Findings:
  • 43 athletes (mean age 33), mean 2.5-year follow-up
  • Limited return to sport in 88% (38 of 43); full return to pre-injury level in 79% (34 of 43)
  • Mean time to return to sport 9.6 months
  • Age 25 years or older and symptom duration over 12 months reduced the chance of return
Clinical implication: A high rate of return to sport is achievable, but counsel that early surgery (shorter symptom duration) and younger age favour full return; high-level return is not guaranteed.
Limitation: Single-centre case series; heterogeneous sports and follow-up only 2.5 years.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 22316548)
Evidence

Fresh OCA for post-traumatic knee defects

LoE 4
Gross AE, Shasha N, Aubin P • Clin Orthop Relat Res (2005)
Key Findings:
  • 60 femoral-condyle grafts: 95% survival at 5 years, 85% at 10 years
  • 65 tibial-plateau grafts: 95% at 5 years, 80% at 10 years, 65% at 15 years
  • Failures were salvaged by graft removal or conversion to total knee arthroplasty
  • Durable joint preservation in young, active post-traumatic patients
Clinical implication: Fresh OCA gives durable reconstruction of post-traumatic femoral and tibial defects; tibial-plateau survivorship declines faster in the second decade. The same group's data indicate bipolar grafts, older age and uncorrected malalignment predict poorer outcomes.
Limitation: Prospective single-centre cohort; results from a highly experienced unit.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 15930924)
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
25 min
Read
0
Sections
intermediate
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
intermediate
Read time
25 min
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Medial Parapatellar Approach to KneeKnee Arthroscopy Approach
Browse all procedures