Skip to main content
OrthoVellumOrthopaedic Exam Prep
Pricing
About OrthoVellum
OrthoVellum
A living orthopaedic atlas

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.


Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Exam Frequency Index
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertising Policy

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Patellofemoral Arthroplasty

Operative SurgeryArthroplasty
ArthroplastyAdvancedCore Procedure

Patellofemoral Arthroplasty

Surgical technique guide for patellofemoral arthroplasty in isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis — indications, medial parapatellar approach, onlay trochlear design, component rotation, patellar resurfacing, outcomes and conversion to total knee arthroplasty

Procedure console
25 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
High-yield overview

Isolated patellofemoral joint replacement for end-stage patellofemoral osteoarthritis · advanced

Isolated PFJ OAThe indication
Onlay trochleaModern design
TF OA progressionTop revision cause
60–90 minTypical duration
Critical Must-Knows
  • Indication requires truly isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis — tibiofemoral compartments must be intact on weight-bearing radiographs and arthroscopy; any tibiofemoral chondral loss greater than Outerbridge grade 2 contraindicates PFA.
  • Onlay trochlear designs have largely replaced older inlay components because they allow better control of rotational alignment and reduce the risk of catching or maltracking at the proximal trochlear transition zone.
  • Trochlear component rotation is set perpendicular to Whiteside's line or parallel to the surgical transepicondylar axis; internal rotation greater than 3 degrees is a major cause of patellar maltracking and early failure.
  • Patellar bone resection must restore native thickness plus 1 mm — overstuffing greater than 2 mm increases patellofemoral contact forces and risks pain or loosening; under-resection risks patellar fracture.

When & Why


Indication. End-stage, symptomatic isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis (or post-traumatic / dysplastic PFJ arthritis) with the tibiofemoral compartments demonstrably intact, that has failed conservative care. "Isolated" is a strict diagnosis: the patient must have Outerbridge grade 2 or less in both tibiofemoral compartments confirmed on weight-bearing radiographs, a Rosenberg view, and either MRI or diagnostic arthroscopy before surgery is offered. Absolute indications

  • Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis with intact tibiofemoral compartments (Outerbridge grade 2 or less on arthroscopy or MRI)
  • Post-traumatic patellofemoral arthritis after patellar fracture or trochlear injury with preserved tibiofemoral cartilage
  • Severe trochlear dysplasia (Dejour type B, C or D) with recurrent instability and end-stage cartilage loss
  • Failed extensor mechanism realignment procedures with isolated PFJ degeneration Relative indications
  • Patient age greater than 50 years with low demand and isolated PFJ disease who wishes to avoid TKA
  • Post-traumatic PFJ arthritis in a patient with an otherwise normal tibiofemoral joint who is too young for TKA
  • Trochlear dysplasia with end-stage PFJ OA where an onlay PFA restores a congruent groove more anatomically than TKA The decision — who is a candidate, who is not. Every PFA begins with the same operation, and the outcome is decided before the incision by patient selection:
Ideal for PFA

Isolated PFJ OA with intact tibiofemoral compartments, especially trochlear dysplasia (Dejour B–D) with end-stage cartilage loss — the onlay component restores a deep, congruent groove that the dysplastic native trochlea never had. Best results when age is greater than 50 years and BMI is less than 35.

Proceed with caution

Relative contraindications: age less than 50 years or BMI greater than 35 (accelerated polyethylene wear and higher revision risk — revision rates roughly double); a previous high tibial or distal femoral osteotomy altering the joint line; or patellar bone stock insufficient to leave a residual thickness greater than 10 mm after resection.

Offer TKA instead

Any tibiofemoral chondral loss Outerbridge grade 3 or 4; inflammatory arthropathy (rheumatoid, psoriatic, ankylosing spondylitis) or prior septic arthritis; uncorrected patellar maltracking with TT-TG greater than 20 mm without a planned tubercle osteotomy; or a fixed flexion deformity greater than 10 degrees or coronal deformity greater than 10 degrees.

Consent specifically for the lifetime risk of conversion to TKA (tibiofemoral OA progression is the leading cause of revision, approximately 20–30 percent at 10 years), patellar maltracking or clunk, anterior knee pain from overstuffing, patellar fracture, infection and the usual arthroplasty risks (DVT/PE). Patients should leave understanding that conversion to TKA is likely within their lifetime. Setup. Supine on a radiolucent table with a bump under the ipsilateral buttock to neutralise hip external rotation; a sandbag or foot-rest holds the knee in 90 degrees of flexion for most of the procedure. A tourniquet sits on the proximal thigh but is inflated only if bleeding obscures visualisation. Anaesthesia is spinal or general with an adductor canal block for postoperative analgesia, plus local infiltration analgesia (ropivacaine, ketorolac and epinephrine) into the capsule and periosteum before arthrotomy. An image intensifier is available but not routinely required; a sterile marking pen, ruler and callipers are essential for measuring patellar thickness and confirming rotation.

The Operation


The goal is to resurface the patellofemoral joint through a medial parapatellar approach, restore a deep congruent trochlear groove with an onlay component, resurface the patella to native thickness plus 1 mm, and confirm central tracking through a full range of motion — while preserving the tibiofemoral compartments and the option of straightforward later conversion to TKA (see the medial parapatellar approach to the knee page). Anatomy that governs the operation. The trochlear groove runs approximately 7 degrees valgus to the femoral shaft and deepens from proximal to distal. In trochlear dysplasia the proximal groove is shallow or convex, so the patella escapes laterally in early flexion; the onlay component restores a deep, congruent groove that engages the patella from 10–15 degrees of flexion onward. The extensor restraints and the landmarks you will reference are: - Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) — primary restraint to lateral translation in the first 30 degrees of flexion; often attenuated in chronic instability.

  • Vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) — dynamic medial stabiliser inserting at the superomedial patella; protect it during the approach.
  • Lateral retinaculum — may require release if tight lateral structures contribute to maltracking.
  • TT-TG distance — measured on CT; greater than 20 mm indicates a need for tubercle medialisation.
  • Whiteside's line — the anteroposterior axis of the femur, perpendicular to the surgical transepicondylar axis; sets trochlear rotation.
  • Surgical transepicondylar axis — from the lateral epicondyle prominence to the medial epicondylar sulcus; the gold-standard reference for femoral component rotation in both PFA and TKA. Structures at risk: the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve crosses the medial joint line during medial parapatellar arthrotomy (postoperative numbness or neuroma), and the superior lateral geniculate artery is encountered during lateral retinacular release and should be coagulated to prevent haemarthrosis.
Patellofemoral arthroplasty
Patellofemoral arthroplasty: a trochlear component and patellar button resurface the patellofemoral joint.Credit: OrthoVellum surgical illustration

Operative sequence

Step 1Position, setup & landmarks
  • Supine on a radiolucent table, bump under the ipsilateral buttock, sandbag or foot-rest to hold 90 degrees of flexion. Tourniquet on the proximal thigh, inflated only if needed.
  • Spinal or general anaesthesia with an adductor canal block; infiltrate local analgesia into the capsule and periosteum before arthrotomy.
  • With the knee flexed, mark the anterior femoral cortex proximal to the trochlear groove (proximal extent), Whiteside's line, and the surgical transepicondylar axis — these set component rotation. Callipers and a marking pen ready.
Step 2Medial parapatellar incision & arthrotomy (the exposure)
  • A midline or slightly medial longitudinal incision from 5 cm above the patella to the tibial tubercle.
  • The medial parapatellar arthrotomy begins about 2 cm medial to the patellar border, curves around the patella leaving a 5 mm cuff of quadriceps tendon and capsule medially, and extends distally along the medial border of the patellar tendon to the tibial tubercle.
  • This exposes the entire trochlea and patella while preserving the lateral retinaculum for a later tracking assessment. Protect the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve crossing the medial joint line.
Step 3Inspect & confirm isolated disease
  • Evert the patella laterally and inspect the entire trochlear groove, the patellar articular surface, and both tibiofemoral compartments under direct vision.
  • Confirm tibiofemoral cartilage is Outerbridge grade 2 or less. If any grade 3 or 4 lesion is found in a tibiofemoral compartment, abort PFA and proceed to TKA — the medial parapatellar approach is already appropriate for it.
  • Measure native patellar thickness with callipers in the midline before any resection.
Step 4Patellar resurfacing preparation
  • Resect the patellar articular surface with a patellar clamp or oscillating saw, aiming for a residual bone thickness of 12–14 mm. The resection plane is parallel to the anterior patellar cortex.
  • Drill peg holes or prepare the surface according to the implant system.
  • Protect the resected patella in saline-soaked gauze while preparing the trochlea.
Step 5Trochlear sizing & rotation
  • Select the trochlear component that covers the entire native trochlea from proximal to distal without overhang.
  • Set rotation with an extramedullary guide perpendicular to Whiteside's line or parallel to the surgical transepicondylar axis. In valgus knees, lateralise the component 2–3 mm relative to the native sulcus.
  • Mark the position with electrocautery before any bone preparation.
Step 6Trochlear bone preparation
  • Prepare the trochlear bed according to the system (milling, burring or saw cuts).
  • The proximal transition zone must be flush or slightly proud of the anterior cortex to prevent patellar catching as it enters the groove in early flexion.
  • Remove all osteophytes and confirm the component seats fully without rocking.
Step 7Trial reduction & tracking assessment
  • Insert trial components, reduce the patella, and assess tracking through a full range of motion.
  • The patella should engage the trochlear groove by 15 degrees of flexion and remain centred without lateral tilt or subluxation throughout. The "no-thumb" test — the patella tracks without manual pressure — must be satisfied.
  • If tracking is poor, perform a lateral retinacular release or revise the trochlear rotation before proceeding.
Step 8Cement final components
  • Cement the trochlear and patellar components with standard PMMA technique.
  • Remove excess cement carefully, especially from the proximal trochlear transition zone.
  • Reassess tracking after cement polymerisation with the final implants.
Step 9Closure & brace
  • Close the arthrotomy with interrupted absorbable sutures. If a lateral release was performed, close the lateral retinaculum loosely, or leave it open if tracking remains perfect.
  • Close subcutaneous tissue and skin, apply a compressive dressing, and a hinged knee brace locked in extension for the first 24–48 hours.
Dangers at trochlear preparation
  • Internal rotation of the trochlear component greater than 3 degrees — shifts the groove medially and causes lateral patellar subluxation. This is the most common technical error leading to maltracking and early revision; verify rotation before final fixation.
  • Oversizing the trochlear component proximally — produces overstuffing and impingement in full extension.
  • Failing to lateralise the groove 2–3 mm in valgus knees — the patella tracks laterally on a centrally placed component.
Set rotation before any bone cut

Set trochlear rotation before making any bone cuts. Place the guide perpendicular to Whiteside's line and confirm it is parallel to the transepicondylar axis. Internal rotation greater than 3 degrees is unacceptable — recut, or accept a slightly externally rotated position, rather than accept internal rotation. The proximal edge of the onlay component must sit proud of the anterior cortex to create a smooth transition zone.

Abort if a tibiofemoral lesion is found intra-operatively

A focal grade 3 chondral lesion on a femoral condyle that was not visible on preoperative imaging is an absolute contraindication — abort the PFA and convert to TKA through the same medial parapatellar approach. Proceeding with PFA over known tibiofemoral disease makes early revision for progression almost certain. Document the finding, and always consent the patient preoperatively for possible conversion.

Implant choices

Use a modern onlay trochlear component (sits proud proximally, allows independent rotation, smooth proximal transition, less clunk) rather than an obsolete inlay design. For the patella, a three-pegged or single central-peg all-polyethylene button restores native thickness plus 1 mm; avoid metal-backed patellar components (higher loosening rates). Cement both components with PMMA — cementless trochlear fixation has been described but is not widely adopted because of concerns about early micromotion.

Bicompartmental Arthroplasty (PFA plus UKA)


The problem it solves. When a patient has isolated patellofemoral arthritis plus one tibiofemoral compartment worn — usually the medial — while the other tibiofemoral compartment and both cruciates are pristine, a TKA sacrifices two healthy structures. Bicompartmental arthroplasty resurfaces only the two diseased compartments and keeps the lateral compartment and the cruciates.

Two ways to do it. Modular ("mix-and-match") — a separate PFA and a separate medial UKA implanted together, so each component is sized and positioned independently; the more forgiving option. Monolithic — a single implant spanning both compartments, technically demanding because one implant must fit two joints and leaves little room to adjust.

Evidence and role. Selected series report function approaching TKA with more natural kinematics and cruciate preservation, but monolithic designs had high early revision from fit and overstuffing problems, and the modular approach lacks long-term comparative data. It remains a niche option for younger patients at high-volume centres, not a mainstream alternative to TKA.

The caveat. It roughly doubles the technical difficulty — two articulations to balance — and, like PFA alone, does nothing to stop osteoarthritis progressing in the untouched lateral compartment.

Aftercare & Complications


Rehabilitation | Phase | Timing | Weight-bearing & bracing | Therapy & goals | |-------|--------|--------------------------|-----------------| | 1 | 0–2 weeks | Weight-bearing as tolerated with crutches or walker; hinged brace locked in extension for first 48 h, then unlocked | Passive and active-assisted ROM from day 1; goal 90 degrees flexion by 2 weeks; quadriceps sets and straight-leg raises | | 2 | 2–6 weeks | Full weight-bearing without aids once quadriceps control is adequate | Progressive active ROM; goal full extension and 120 degrees flexion by 6 weeks; stationary cycling, swimming, patellar mobilisation | | 3 | 6–12 weeks | Return to work and light recreation | Closed-chain strengthening, proprioceptive training; full activities as tolerated by 3 months | | Long term | 3 months onward | No high-impact sports (running, jumping, pivoting) to prolong implant survival | Annual radiographic surveillance for tibiofemoral progression | Complications

Progression of tibiofemoral OA
Incidence
20–30% at 10 years (leading revision cause)
Recognition
Gradual return of medial or lateral knee pain; joint-space narrowing on weight-bearing radiographs
Prevention & management
Prevention: strict preoperative confirmation of isolated PFJ disease. Management: conversion to TKA — straightforward when the original approach was medial parapatellar; primary components usually sufficient
Patellar maltracking or clunk
Incidence
5–10%
Recognition
Lateral patellar subluxation on skyline views; audible or palpable clunk between 10–30 degrees flexion
Prevention & management
Prevention: correct trochlear rotation, lateralise the component in valgus knees, lateral release if needed. Management: revision of trochlear rotation or proximal trochlear extension; rarely needs TKA
Patellar overstuffing
Incidence
3–5%
Recognition
Persistent anterior knee pain; patella feels thick; limited flexion
Prevention & management
Prevention: measure native thickness before resection; restore native plus 1 mm maximum. Management: patellar revision with a thinner button or bone grafting if severe
Component loosening
Incidence
less than 5% at 10 years
Recognition
Progressive pain; radiolucent lines greater than 2 mm; migration on serial imaging
Prevention & management
Prevention: adequate cement mantle, good bone quality. Management: revision to TKA with stem and augments if bone loss present
Patellar fracture
Incidence
1–2%
Recognition
Sudden pain and swelling after a fall or forceful quadriceps contraction; displaced or non-displaced fracture on radiographs
Prevention & management
Prevention: avoid over-resection (residual bone less than 10 mm); protect during cementation. Management: non-displaced — extension bracing; displaced — ORIF or patellectomy if unreconstructible
Infection
Incidence
less than 1%
Recognition
Erythema, warmth, effusion, elevated CRP/ESR; sinus tract in chronic cases
Prevention & management
Prevention: standard perioperative antibiotics, sterile technique. Management: DAIR for acute; two-stage revision for chronic
Complications — recognition, prevention, management
ComplicationIncidenceRecognitionPrevention & management
Progression of tibiofemoral OA20–30% at 10 years (leading revision cause)Gradual return of medial or lateral knee pain; joint-space narrowing on weight-bearing radiographsPrevention: strict preoperative confirmation of isolated PFJ disease. Management: conversion to TKA — straightforward when the original approach was medial parapatellar; primary components usually sufficient
Patellar maltracking or clunk5–10%Lateral patellar subluxation on skyline views; audible or palpable clunk between 10–30 degrees flexionPrevention: correct trochlear rotation, lateralise the component in valgus knees, lateral release if needed. Management: revision of trochlear rotation or proximal trochlear extension; rarely needs TKA
Patellar overstuffing3–5%Persistent anterior knee pain; patella feels thick; limited flexionPrevention: measure native thickness before resection; restore native plus 1 mm maximum. Management: patellar revision with a thinner button or bone grafting if severe
Component looseningless than 5% at 10 yearsProgressive pain; radiolucent lines greater than 2 mm; migration on serial imagingPrevention: adequate cement mantle, good bone quality. Management: revision to TKA with stem and augments if bone loss present
Patellar fracture1–2%Sudden pain and swelling after a fall or forceful quadriceps contraction; displaced or non-displaced fracture on radiographsPrevention: avoid over-resection (residual bone less than 10 mm); protect during cementation. Management: non-displaced — extension bracing; displaced — ORIF or patellectomy if unreconstructible
Infectionless than 1%Erythema, warmth, effusion, elevated CRP/ESR; sinus tract in chronic casesPrevention: standard perioperative antibiotics, sterile technique. Management: DAIR for acute; two-stage revision for chronic

Conversion of PFA to TKA Indications for conversion are progression of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis causing pain and functional limitation, component loosening or malposition causing persistent symptoms, and patellar maltracking not correctable by revision of the PFA components. Technically, the medial parapatellar approach is reopened, the trochlear component is removed with osteotomes and a saw, and the distal femur is recut in measured-resection fashion using the existing intramedullary canal or extramedullary alignment. The patellar component is revised to a primary TKA button. In the majority of cases a primary TKA system without stems or augments is sufficient (stems or augments are required in less than 15 percent of conversions, and only when significant bone loss occurred at the index procedure). Outcomes after conversion are equivalent to primary TKA when it is performed for progression rather than for component malposition.

Viva & Exam Focus


Mnemonic

P.F.A.P.F.A. — patellofemoral arthroplasty principles

P
Patient selection
Isolated PFJ OA only; any tibiofemoral Outerbridge grade 3 or greater, or inflammatory disease, means TKA instead
F
Femoral (trochlear) rotation
Perpendicular to Whiteside's line or parallel to the transepicondylar axis — internal rotation greater than 3 degrees causes maltracking
A
Avoid overstuffing
Restore native patellar thickness plus 1 mm maximum; measure before and after resection with callipers
Mnemonic

INDICATIONSI.N.D.I.C.A.T.I.O.N.S. — a selection checklist before offering PFA

I
Isolated PFJ disease
Confirmed on weight-bearing radiographs, Rosenberg view, and arthroscopy or MRI
N
No tibiofemoral loss
Outerbridge grade 2 or less in both compartments
D
Deformity correctable
TT-TG less than 20 mm, or a planned tubercle osteotomy if greater
I
Inflammatory arthritis excluded
Rheumatoid, psoriatic or post-septic disease requires TKA
C
Correct trochlear version
Onlay component restores the groove in dysplasia (Dejour B–D)
A
Age & activity appropriate
Best results with age greater than 50 and BMI less than 35
T
Tracking optimised
Lateral release or tubercle transfer at the index procedure if needed
I
Informed consent
Conversion to TKA is likely within 10–15 years
O
Onlay trochlear design
Preferred over older inlay components for better proximal transition and rotation control
N
Normal patellar stock
Residual thickness after resection must allow a 12–14 mm button composite
S
Surgeon experience
With patellar tracking and the revision-conversion pathway

Clinical Decision Scenarios

Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“A 62-year-old woman with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis secondary to trochlear dysplasia presents for consideration of patellofemoral arthroplasty. She has no tibiofemoral symptoms and weight-bearing radiographs show preserved joint space. How do you confirm she is a suitable candidate and what specific technical points will you address during surgery?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“You are planning patellofemoral arthroplasty in a 55-year-old man with post-traumatic PFJ arthritis after a patellar fracture. During exposure you notice a focal grade 3 chondral lesion on the medial femoral condyle that was not visible on preoperative MRI. How do you proceed?”

Viva scenarioAdvanced
Clinical prompt

“A 68-year-old woman who underwent patellofemoral arthroplasty 7 years ago presents with increasing medial knee pain. Weight-bearing radiographs show medial joint-space narrowing. How do you evaluate her and plan revision surgery?”

Exam day cheat sheet
Patellofemoral arthroplasty — exam-day essentials

Indications

  • Isolated patellofemoral OA with intact tibiofemoral compartments (Outerbridge grade 2 or less)
  • Trochlear dysplasia (Dejour B–D) with end-stage PFJ cartilage loss — an excellent indication
  • Post-traumatic PFJ arthritis with a preserved tibiofemoral joint
  • Age greater than 50 and BMI less than 35 preferred; younger or obese patients have higher revision risk

Absolute contraindications

  • Any tibiofemoral chondral loss Outerbridge grade 3 or 4 on imaging or arthroscopy
  • Inflammatory or post-septic arthritis
  • Uncorrected patellar maltracking (TT-TG greater than 20 mm without planned realignment)
  • Fixed flexion deformity greater than 10 degrees or coronal deformity greater than 10 degrees

Surgical anatomy landmarks

  • Whiteside's line: AP axis of the femur — trochlear rotation is set perpendicular to it
  • Surgical transepicondylar axis: the gold-standard reference for femoral component rotation
  • TT-TG distance: on CT; greater than 20 mm requires a tubercle osteotomy
  • Native patellar thickness: measure before resection; restore plus 1 mm maximum

Trochlear component principles

  • Onlay designs preferred over older inlay components — better proximal transition and rotation control
  • Rotation perpendicular to Whiteside's line or parallel to the transepicondylar axis — internal rotation greater than 3 degrees causes maltracking
  • Lateralise the groove 2–3 mm in valgus knees
  • Proximal transition zone must be slightly proud to prevent patellar catching

Patellar resurfacing rules

  • Residual bone thickness after resection: 12–14 mm in most patients
  • Composite thickness (bone plus button) equals native thickness plus 1 mm
  • Overstuffing greater than 2 mm raises the patellofemoral joint reaction force by up to 30 percent
  • Under-resection risks patellar fracture; over-resection risks button loosening

Complications & leading revision cause

  • Progression of tibiofemoral OA: 20–30 percent at 10 years — the leading cause of revision
  • Patellar maltracking or clunk: 5–10 percent — usually from internal rotation or proximal edge prominence
  • Patellar overstuffing: 3–5 percent — measure thickness before and after resection
  • Component loosening: less than 5 percent at 10 years with modern onlay designs

Conversion to TKA

  • The medial parapatellar approach is re-used — technically straightforward
  • Primary TKA components are sufficient in greater than 85 percent of conversions
  • Stemmed components or augments are required in less than 15 percent
  • Outcomes equivalent to primary TKA when performed for progression rather than component malposition

Post-operative protocol

  • Active ROM from day 1 — goal 90 degrees flexion by 2 weeks
  • Weight-bearing as tolerated with the brace locked in extension for the first 48 hours
  • No high-impact sports recommended to prolong implant survival
  • Annual radiographic surveillance for tibiofemoral progression

Background & Evidence


Epidemiology. Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis — disease confined to the patellofemoral joint with preserved tibiofemoral compartments — accounts for a minority of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. It is seen in three broad groups: trochlear dysplasia (often younger women, bilateral), post-traumatic arthritis after patellar or trochlear injury, and idiopathic disease in older patients. It is more common in women and is frequently bilateral. Patellofemoral arthritis of some degree is far more common than truly isolated disease, which is why rigorous confirmation of intact tibiofemoral compartments is the whole basis of selecting a patient for PFA. Pathoanatomy and why the onlay component works. In a native knee the trochlear groove deepens from proximal to distal and engages the patella from early flexion. In trochlear dysplasia (Dejour types B–D) the proximal groove is shallow or convex, so the patella escapes laterally; abnormal contact stresses then destroy the articular cartilage. PFA is uniquely effective in this group because the onlay trochlear component restores a deep, congruent groove that the dysplastic native trochlea never had — correcting the primary pathology rather than merely replacing a worn surface. This is why patients with dysplasia have the best long-term results. Evolution of the design — inlay to onlay. Older inlay trochlear components, recessed into the trochlear groove, had high rates of catching at the proximal transition zone and difficulty controlling rotation. Modern onlay designs sit proud of the native bone proximally, allow independent rotation control, and create a smooth proximal transition that reduces patellar clunk. Contemporary onlay series report 10-year survivorship greater than 85 percent when strict patient selection is applied. When performed for truly isolated PFJ OA, PFA gives reliable pain relief and functional improvement comparable to TKA in the first 5–7 years, with the advantages of preserving bone stock and allowing easier later conversion. The dominant failure mode and conversion data. The leading cause of revision after PFA is progression of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (approximately 20–30 percent at 10 years) — not failure of the patellofemoral components themselves. This is why counselling every patient about the lifetime risk of conversion is mandatory. Reassuringly, conversion of a failed PFA to TKA is technically straightforward through the same medial parapatellar approach: primary TKA components are sufficient in the great majority, stems or augments are needed in less than 15 percent, and outcomes are equivalent to a primary TKA when conversion is for progression rather than component malposition.

References


Evidence

Patellofemoral Arthroplasty: An Evolving Science

Level IV
Lonner JH • Instr Course Lect (2017)
Key Findings:
  • Reviews the evolution of PFA techniques and stresses the importance of strict patient selection for isolated PFJ disease
Clinical implication: Modern onlay PFA designs with accurate component positioning provide reliable outcomes when the tibiofemoral compartments are preserved.
Source: Instr Course Lect 2017;66:211-221
Verify on PubMed (PMID 28594500)
Evidence

Significant Functional Improvement at 2 Years After Isolated Patellofemoral Arthroplasty With an Onlay Trochlear Implant, But Low Mental Health Scores Predispose to Dissatisfaction

Level III
Kazarian GS, Tarity TD, Hansen EN, Cai J, Lonner JH • J Arthroplasty (2016)
Key Findings:
  • Demonstrated significant functional improvement at 2 years after isolated PFA using onlay trochlear implants
Clinical implication: Onlay PFA yields good early functional results; preoperative mental health status influences patient satisfaction.
Source: J Arthroplasty 2016;31(2):389-94
Verify on PubMed (PMID 26483259)
Evidence

Return to Sport After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Patello-Femoral Arthroplasty

Level III
Cozzarelli NF, Khan IA, Arshi A, Sherman MB, Lonner JH, Fillingham YA • J Arthroplasty (2024)
Key Findings:
  • High rates of return to sport after PFA comparable to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in selected patients
Clinical implication: PFA allows active patients to return to recreational sports when performed for truly isolated disease.
Source: J Arthroplasty 2024;39(8):1988-1995.e5
Verify on PubMed (PMID 38367903)
Evidence

Femoral component rotation in patellofemoral joint replacement

Level III
van Jonbergen HW, Westerbeek RE • Knee (2018)
Key Findings:
  • Proper femoral component rotation is critical for optimal patellar tracking and clinical outcomes in PFA
Clinical implication: Internal rotation of the trochlear component should be avoided; alignment should reference the surgical transepicondylar axis.
Source: Knee 2018;25(3):485-490
Verify on PubMed (PMID 29551276)
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policy
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Procedure console
25 min
Read
0
Sections
advanced
Level
Peer-reviewed · 2026-06-20
Procedure info
Level
advanced
Read time
25 min
Updated
2026-06-20
SURGICAL APPROACHES USED
Medial Parapatellar Approach to Knee
Browse all procedures