Isolated patellofemoral joint replacement for end-stage PFJ osteoarthritis | advanced
Surgical Imaging
The trap: Assuming that radiographic tibiofemoral joint space narrowing is the only contraindication — early chondral softening or focal grade 3 lesions missed on plain films will progress rapidly after PFA and cause early revision.
The fix: Require weight-bearing AP, lateral, Rosenberg, and skyline views plus diagnostic arthroscopy or MRI to confirm Outerbridge grade less than or equal to 2 in both tibiofemoral compartments before offering PFA. Any grade 3 or 4 lesion in the medial or lateral compartment is an absolute contraindication.
Location: The trochlear component must sit perpendicular to Whiteside's line or parallel to the surgical transepicondylar axis; internal rotation greater than 3 degrees shifts the groove medially and causes lateral patellar subluxation.
Risk: Internal rotation is the most common technical error leading to patellar maltracking, clunk, and early revision. Always verify rotation with the stylus or extramedullary guide before final fixation.
Location: Patellar resection must leave a residual bone thickness of 12-14 mm in most patients; composite thickness (bone plus button) must equal native patellar thickness plus 1 mm.
Risk: Overstuffing greater than 2 mm increases patellofemoral joint reaction force by up to 30 percent, causing anterior knee pain, accelerated polyethylene wear, and component loosening. Always measure native thickness with callipers before resection.
Deformity: Inflammatory arthropathy (rheumatoid, psoriatic) or prior septic arthritis produces synovial proliferation and ligament attenuation that PFA cannot address.
Risk: High failure rate from recurrent synovitis, instability, and rapid tibiofemoral progression. PFA is contraindicated in any inflammatory or post-infectious arthritis — proceed directly to TKA.
Why different: Pre-existing lateral patellar subluxation from trochlear dysplasia or TT-TG greater than 20 mm must be corrected (medial tibial tubercle transfer or lateral release) at the time of PFA or the patella will continue to track laterally on the new component.
Implications: Failure to address maltracking produces edge loading, accelerated wear, and early revision. Measure TT-TG on CT and plan concomitant realignment when indicated.
Why different: BMI greater than 35 and age less than 50 years are relative contraindications because of accelerated polyethylene wear and higher mechanical demands that shorten implant survival.
Risk: Revision rates double in patients under 50 and with BMI greater than 35. Counsel carefully and consider TKA or osteotomy in these groups unless strong patient preference after informed consent.
P.F.A.P.F.A. — Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Principles
I.N.D.I.C.A.T.I.O.N.S.I.N.D.I.C.A.T.I.O.N.S. — When to Choose PFA
R.O.T.A.T.E.R.O.T.A.T.E. — Trochlear Component Alignment
Surgical Indications
Absolute Indications
- Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis with intact tibiofemoral compartments (Outerbridge grade less than or equal to 2 on arthroscopy or MRI)
- Post-traumatic patellofemoral arthritis after patellar fracture or trochlear injury with preserved tibiofemoral cartilage
- Severe trochlear dysplasia (Dejour type B, C or D) with recurrent instability and end-stage cartilage loss
- Failed extensor mechanism realignment procedures with isolated PFJ degeneration
Relative Indications
- Patient age greater than 50 years with low demand and isolated PFJ disease who wishes to avoid TKA
- Post-traumatic PFJ arthritis in a patient with otherwise normal tibiofemoral joint who is too young for TKA
- Trochlear dysplasia with end-stage PFJ OA where onlay PFA restores a congruent groove more anatomically than TKA
Contraindications
Absolute:
- Any tibiofemoral chondral loss Outerbridge grade 3 or 4 on weight-bearing radiographs, Rosenberg view, or arthroscopy
- Inflammatory arthropathy (rheumatoid, psoriatic, ankylosing spondylitis) or prior septic arthritis
- Uncorrected patellar maltracking (TT-TG greater than 20 mm without planned tubercle osteotomy)
- Fixed flexion deformity greater than 10 degrees or valgus/varus greater than 10 degrees
Relative:
- Age less than 50 years or BMI greater than 35 (accelerated wear and higher revision risk)
- Previous high tibial osteotomy or distal femoral osteotomy altering joint line
- Patellar bone stock insufficient for resurfacing (residual thickness less than 10 mm after resection)
Evidence for Patellofemoral Arthroplasty
Evolution from Inlay to Onlay Designs
Older inlay trochlear components recessed into the trochlear groove had high rates of catching at the proximal transition zone and difficulty controlling rotation. Modern onlay designs sit proud of the native bone, allow independent rotation control, and create a smooth proximal transition that reduces patellar clunk. Contemporary series using onlay components report 10-year survivorship greater than 85 percent when strict patient selection is applied.
Outcomes versus Isolated Patellofemoral Disease
When performed for truly isolated PFJ OA, PFA provides reliable pain relief and functional improvement comparable to TKA in the first 5-7 years, with the advantage of preserving bone stock and allowing easier conversion. However, the leading cause of revision remains progression of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (approximately 20-30 percent at 10 years). Patients with trochlear dysplasia have the best long-term outcomes because the onlay component corrects the shallow groove that caused their original pathology.
Conversion to Total Knee Arthroplasty
Conversion of a failed PFA to TKA is technically straightforward when the original approach was medial parapatellar. The trochlear component is removed, the distal femur recut in measured-resection fashion, and a primary TKA system is used in the majority of cases. Stemmed components or augments are required in less than 15 percent of conversions. Outcomes after conversion are equivalent to primary TKA when performed for progression rather than component malposition.
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A 62-year-old woman with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis secondary to trochlear dysplasia presents for consideration of patellofemoral arthroplasty. She has no tibiofemoral symptoms and weight-bearing radiographs show preserved joint space. How do you confirm she is a suitable candidate and what specific technical points will you address during surgery?”
“You are planning patellofemoral arthroplasty in a 55-year-old man with post-traumatic PFJ arthritis after a patellar fracture. During exposure you notice a focal grade 3 chondral lesion on the medial femoral condyle that was not visible on preoperative MRI. How do you proceed?”
“A 68-year-old woman who underwent patellofemoral arthroplasty 7 years ago presents with increasing medial knee pain. Weight-bearing radiographs show medial joint-space narrowing. How do you evaluate her and plan revision surgery?”