Paediatrics

Pelvic Osteotomies β€” A Comparative Overview

Comparative overview of pelvic osteotomies for hip dysplasia - redirectional (Salter, triple, periacetabular/PAO), reshaping (Pemberton, Dega) and salvage (Chiari, shelf/Staheli) procedures, with selection by triradiate status, congruity and age

Core Procedure
advanced
By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Editorial maintenance, source checking, and correction workflow β€’ Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

High-yield overview

Redirectional, reshaping and salvage osteotomies for hip dysplasia | advanced

Surgical Imaging

Redirectional pelvic osteotomies compared
Redirectional osteotomies reorient a congruent acetabulum: Salter single innominate, triple innominate, and the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), which preserves the posterior column.Credit: AI-generated medical image Β· OrthoVellum
Salvage pelvic osteotomies (Chiari and shelf)
Salvage osteotomies for an incongruent hip create fibrocartilaginous cover: the Chiari medial-displacement osteotomy and the shelf / Staheli slotted acetabular augmentation.Credit: AI-generated medical image Β· OrthoVellum
Bernese periacetabular osteotomy technique
The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: juxta-acetabular cuts free a single acetabular fragment that is reoriented over the femoral head and fixed with screws, leaving the posterior column intact.Credit: AI-generated medical image Β· OrthoVellum

Critical Decision Points and Exam Traps

Triradiate Cartilage β€” Open vs Closed

The trap: Choosing a reshaping osteotomy in a skeletally mature hip, or a PAO in a child.

The rule: Pemberton and Dega REQUIRE an open triradiate as their hinge. The PAO REQUIRES a closed triradiate β€” performing it through an open triradiate risks devascularising and growth-arresting the acetabulum. Triradiate fusion occurs around 12-16 years.

Congruent vs Incongruent Joint

The trap: Performing a redirectional osteotomy on an incongruent joint and worsening contact mechanics.

The rule: Redirectional and reshaping procedures need a CONGRUENT, reducible, near-spherical joint. If the joint cannot be made congruent (aspherical head, advanced subluxation), choose a SALVAGE procedure (Chiari or shelf) which accepts incongruity and creates fibrocartilage cover.

Posterior Column Integrity (PAO)

Why it matters: The defining advantage of the PAO is that the posterior column remains INTACT, allowing early protected weight-bearing and giving a stable fragment for fixation.

The risk: An errant ischial or retroacetabular cut can breach the posterior column or enter the joint β€” both are serious technical complications. Intra-articular penetration must be excluded with imaging.

Sciatic Nerve

Location: Exits beneath piriformis posterior to the hip; at risk during the posterior/ischial cuts of triple and periacetabular osteotomies and from posterior retraction.

Protection: Stay anterior to the posterior column, control the ischial cut, avoid over-medial retraction, and beware overcorrection that tents the nerve. Highest reported neurological risk is the sciatic nerve in posterior-based osteotomies.

Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN)

Location: Crosses near the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) β€” directly in the path of the ilioinguinal/Smith-Petersen approaches used for most pelvic osteotomies.

Implication: LFCN dysfunction (meralgia paraesthetica) is the COMMONEST neurological complication of the PAO. Counsel every patient; protect the nerve during the anterior approach and ASIS osteotomy.

Salvage vs Reconstructive Intent

Reconstructive (redirectional/reshaping): Restores hyaline-cartilage weight-bearing surface over the head β€” the goal in a congruent dysplastic hip.

Salvage (Chiari/shelf): Increases the weight-bearing AREA with fibrocartilage metaplasia (NOT hyaline) when reconstruction is impossible β€” accept this trade-off only when the joint cannot be made congruent.

Mnemonic

R.E.D.I.R.E.C.TREDIRECT β€” Choosing a Redirectional Osteotomy

Mnemonic

S.A.L.V.A.G.ESALVAGE β€” When to Abandon Reconstruction

Why Operate on the Pelvis in Dysplasia

In developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and residual acetabular dysplasia, the acetabulum provides deficient anterolateral cover of the femoral head. This concentrates load over a small contact area, produces high cartilage contact stress, and drives premature osteoarthritis. Pelvic osteotomies aim to either reorient or reshape the native socket (reconstructive intent) or, where this is not possible, increase the weight-bearing area with a buttress (salvage intent).

The Three Families of Pelvic Osteotomy

1. Redirectional Osteotomies

The acetabulum is of essentially NORMAL shape but malpositioned. The osteotomy reorients the entire intact socket over the head to improve cover. They require a congruent, reducible, near-spherical joint.

  • Salter (single innominate) β€” one supra-acetabular iliac cut, hinging on the symphysis pubis
  • Triple innominate (Steel / TΓΆnnis) β€” ilium, pubis and ischium divided, freeing the fragment
  • Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO; Ganz / Bernese) β€” multiple juxta-articular cuts freeing the acetabulum while preserving the posterior column

2. Reshaping / Volume-Reducing Osteotomies

These bend the acetabulum around the triradiate cartilage, which acts as the hinge β€” so an OPEN triradiate is mandatory. They reduce acetabular volume and increase cover by changing socket shape.

  • Pemberton (pericapsular) β€” cut curves down to the triradiate; hinges on the triradiate, rotating the acetabular roof
  • Dega (transiliac/incomplete) β€” incomplete iliac osteotomy with a posterior cortical hinge; flexible direction of correction

3. Salvage Osteotomies

Used when the joint is incongruent and cannot be made congruent. They do NOT reorient hyaline cartilage; instead they increase the load-bearing surface, which undergoes fibrocartilage metaplasia.

  • Chiari β€” medial displacement osteotomy just above the acetabulum; the iliac wing becomes a buttress and the hip centre is medialised
  • Shelf / Staheli (slotted acetabular augmentation) β€” extra-articular bony shelf laid over the capsule to extend lateral cover

Key Decision Drivers (memorise these)

DriverFavours redirectionalFavours reshapingFavours salvage
Triradiate cartilageOpen (Salter/triple) or closed (PAO)OPEN (essential hinge)Either
Joint congruityCongruent / reducibleCongruentINCONGRUENT
Head sphericitySphericalSphericalAspherical acceptable
AgeSalter ~1.5-6 y; triple older child; PAO adolescent/adultInfant–young child (open triradiate)Older child / adult
Severity / correction neededMild-moderate (Salter) to large (PAO)ModerateCoverage when reconstruction impossible

Combination with Femoral Osteotomy

Pelvic osteotomies are frequently combined with a proximal femoral osteotomy (varus derotation osteotomy, VDRO) when there is coexisting femoral deformity β€” excessive anteversion, coxa valga, or to improve concentric reduction and head-neck offset. The pelvic side corrects acetabular deficiency; the femoral side corrects proximal femoral morphology. In high dislocations a femoral shortening osteotomy may be added to reduce the head safely and lower the risk of avascular necrosis.


Clinical Decision Scenarios

Use these scenarios to practise clinical reasoning and management decisions

CLINICAL SCENARIOAdvanced

CLINICAL PROMPT

"A 3-year-old child with residual acetabular dysplasia after treated DDH has a concentrically reduced, congruent hip with an open triradiate cartilage and persistent anterolateral deficiency. What surgical options would you consider and how do you choose between them?"

PRACTICAL APPROACH
In a 3-year-old with a CONGRUENT, concentrically reduced hip and an OPEN triradiate, I am in the reconstructive territory β€” the question is whether to REORIENT the socket (redirectional) or RESHAPE it (volume-reducing), and a salvage procedure is not appropriate because the joint is congruent. **Redirectional option β€” Salter single innominate osteotomy**: A single iliac cut hinging on the mobile symphysis pubis, rotating the acetabular fragment anterolaterally to improve cover. It suits this age (mobile symphysis), it does not change acetabular volume, and the correction is limited (roughly 15-25 degrees). It is my choice for a moderate anterolateral deficiency with a normally-shaped but maloriented socket. **Reshaping options β€” Pemberton or Dega**: If the acetabulum is capacious or dysplastic in SHAPE relative to the head, I would reshape it. The Pemberton hinges on the triradiate cartilage (which mandates it being open, as it is here) and reduces acetabular volume by levering the roof down. The Dega is an incomplete transiliac osteotomy leaving a posterior/medial cortical hinge, with the direction of correction adjustable by graft placement β€” versatile if there is posterior or global deficiency. **How I choose**: Normal acetabular shape, malorientation, moderate correction β†’ Salter. Capacious/abnormally shaped acetabulum needing volume reduction β†’ Pemberton. Need for adjustable, often posterior, correction or a more global deficiency β†’ Dega. In all of these I confirm the joint is concentrically reduced and congruent first. **Femoral side**: If there is excessive anteversion or coxa valga, I would add a proximal femoral varus derotation osteotomy. **After-care**: A hip spica is typically needed in this age group; the joint must remain congruent throughout.
CLINICAL SCENARIOAdvanced

CLINICAL PROMPT

"A 19-year-old woman has symptomatic acetabular dysplasia with groin pain, a closed triradiate, a congruent and well-preserved joint, and a deficient lateral centre-edge angle. Why is the periacetabular osteotomy the operation of choice, and what are its specific advantages and risks?"

PRACTICAL APPROACH
This is the classic indication for a periacetabular (Bernese/Ganz) osteotomy: a skeletally mature patient (closed triradiate) with a CONGRUENT, spherical, well-preserved joint and symptomatic dysplasia. **Why PAO over the alternatives**: A single Salter cut gives insufficient correction and needs a mobile symphysis (not present at this age). A triple innominate divides the posterior column, giving a less stable construct and distorting the pelvic ring. The PAO achieves powerful multiplanar reorientation through juxta-articular cuts while preserving the posterior column. **Specific advantages of the PAO**: - **Multiplanar correction** β€” restores anterior and lateral cover and corrects version through a single anterior approach. - **Posterior column preserved** β€” the pelvic ring stays continuous, so the construct is stable and the patient can begin early protected weight-bearing. - **Acetabular blood supply preserved** β€” the reoriented fragment remains vascular. - **True pelvis undistorted** β€” important in a woman of childbearing age as the birth canal is preserved. **Targets**: I reorient to restore a normal lateral and anterior centre-edge angle and a horizontal sourcil, WITHOUT creating retroversion or overcoverage, and I check head-neck offset, treating any impingement. **Specific risks I counsel about**: - **LFCN dysfunction** (meralgia paraesthetica) β€” the commonest neurological complication. - **Sciatic / femoral / obturator nerve injury** β€” less common, related to the ischial and pubic cuts. - **Intra-articular penetration** of the retroacetabular cut and **posterior column breach**. - **Overcorrection causing iatrogenic FAI**, nonunion (especially the pubic ramus), and heterotopic ossification. The PAO is contraindicated if the joint is incongruent or already significantly arthritic β€” those patients are better served by salvage or, eventually, arthroplasty.
CLINICAL SCENARIOAdvanced

CLINICAL PROMPT

"A 14-year-old with neuromuscular hip subluxation has a painful, INCONGRUENT hip with an aspherical, partly uncovered femoral head that cannot be reduced to a congruent position. Reconstruction is not feasible. What are your salvage options and how do they differ?"

PRACTICAL APPROACH
When the joint is INCONGRUENT and cannot be made congruent, redirectional and reshaping osteotomies are inappropriate because they rely on reorienting or reshaping a congruent socket. The aim shifts to a SALVAGE procedure that increases the weight-bearing area with fibrocartilage cover, relieves pain and delays arthroplasty. **Chiari medial displacement osteotomy**: A curved iliac osteotomy just above the acetabular margin; the distal fragment carrying the acetabulum is displaced MEDIALLY, so the iliac wing overhangs the head as a bony buttress and the interposed capsule undergoes fibrocartilage metaplasia. Its distinguishing feature is that it MEDIALISES the hip centre, reducing the joint reaction force lever arm β€” useful in a subluxated, laterally-positioned hip. Risks include over-medialisation, sciatic nerve injury and joint penetration. **Shelf / Staheli slotted acetabular augmentation**: An EXTRA-articular bony shelf is slotted into the ilium just above the acetabular rim to extend the lateral roof over the capsule; again the cover that forms is fibrocartilage. It does not medialise the hip and is technically a soft-tissue-over-bone augmentation that relies on a good capsule; the main concern is graft resorption or fracture. **How they differ**: Chiari changes the bony architecture and MEDIALISES the hip centre (load-altering), whereas the shelf simply ADDS lateral cover without changing the hip centre. Both produce fibrocartilage, not hyaline, cartilage. **Key counselling point**: Salvage is a compromise β€” it improves containment and pain and buys time, but it does not restore a normal hyaline-cartilage joint. In a neuromuscular hip I would also consider the femoral side (varus derotation Β± shortening) and address adductor/soft-tissue contractures.

Pelvic Osteotomies β€” Exam Day Summary

Clinical summary

Evidence Base

A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias β€” technique and preliminary results

Level IV
Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh TS, Mast JW β€’ Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Clinical Implication: Establishes the defining principle of the PAO β€” powerful multiplanar reorientation with a preserved, vascularised posterior column that permits stable two-screw fixation and early weight-bearing without distorting the true pelvis.

Mean 20-year followup of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy

Level III
Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Ganz R, Siebenrock KA β€’ Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Clinical Implication: Confirms the PAO durably preserves the native hip in correctly selected patients, and that pre-existing arthritis, incongruity and impingement are the chief predictors of failure β€” the basis for restricting the operation to congruent, low-arthritis joints.

Complications associated with the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia in adolescents

Level IV
Thawrani D, Sucato DJ, Podeszwa DA, DeLaRocha A β€’ The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume)
Clinical Implication: Quantifies the real-world complication profile β€” nerve injury (notably LFCN), pubic ramus nonunion and fragment/head osteonecrosis β€” and identifies combined femoral osteotomy and non-DDH pathology as risk amplifiers to counsel and plan for.

Comparison of acetabular anterior coverage after Salter osteotomy and Pemberton acetabuloplasty β€” a long-term followup

Level III
Wang CW, Wu KW, Wang TM, Huang SC, Kuo KN β€’ Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Clinical Implication: Validates the mechanistic distinction central to selection β€” Pemberton reshapes the socket through the triradiate hinge and adds anterior cover (with a measurable impingement risk), whereas Salter reorients a normal-shaped socket β€” while both give durable function when correctly indicated.

Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: indications, technique and results 30 years after the first description

Level V
Lerch TD, Steppacher SD, Liechti EF, Siebenrock KA, Tannast M β€’ Der Orthopade
Clinical Implication: Provides the long-horizon survivorship benchmarks (80-90 percent at 10 years declining with time) and confirms accurate reorientation plus a spherical head as the determinants of durability β€” the figures to quote in the viva.

References

  1. Salter RB (1961). Innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. β€” Original description of the single innominate osteotomy hinging on the symphysis pubis.

  2. Steel HH (1973). Triple osteotomy of the innominate bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. β€” Description of the triple innominate osteotomy for greater acetabular redirection.

  3. Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh TS, Mast JW (1988). A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias: technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (232):26-36. PMID 3383491. β€” Original description of the Bernese (Ganz) periacetabular osteotomy, including preservation of the posterior column.

  4. Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Ganz R, Siebenrock KA (2008). Mean 20-year followup of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 466(7):1633-44. PMID 18449617. β€” 60% hip preservation at 20 years; predictors of poor outcome.

  5. Thawrani D, Sucato DJ, Podeszwa DA, DeLaRocha A (2010). Complications associated with the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia in adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 92(8):1707-14. PMID 20660233. β€” Major/minor complication profile in adolescents.

  6. Wang CW, Wu KW, Wang TM, Huang SC, Kuo KN (2013). Comparison of acetabular anterior coverage after Salter osteotomy and Pemberton acetabuloplasty: a long-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 472(3):1001-9. PMID 24096458. β€” Pemberton (reshaping) adds more anterior cover than Salter (redirectional).

  7. Lerch TD, Steppacher SD, Liechti EF, Siebenrock KA, Tannast M (2016). Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: indications, technique and results 30 years after the first description. Orthopade. 45(8):687-94. PMID 27250618. β€” 30-year survivorship synthesis.

  8. Pemberton PA (1965). Pericapsular osteotomy of the ilium for treatment of congenital subluxation and dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. β€” Original description of the pericapsular (Pemberton) osteotomy hinging on the triradiate cartilage.

  9. Chiari K (1974). Medial displacement osteotomy of the pelvis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. β€” Description of the Chiari medial displacement salvage osteotomy.

  10. Staheli LT (1981). Slotted acetabular augmentation. J Pediatr Orthop. β€” Description of the slotted (Staheli) shelf acetabular augmentation salvage technique.

  11. TΓΆnnis D, Behrens K, Tscharani F (1981). A modified technique of the triple pelvic osteotomy: early results. J Pediatr Orthop. β€” Juxta-articular modification of the triple osteotomy allowing greater correction.